Upload
others
View
13
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
107
CHAPTER-IV
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTES MANAGEMENT
4.1 Introduction
Today, solid waste has emerged as a major environmental concern from local
level to global level. At the household level, people discard off their waste in an improper
manner. The method of collection, segregation and transportation of wastes are not up to
the mark and has resulted in creating unhygienic conditions in surrounding environment.
Management of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) is of immediate importance in urban
areas, especially in the rapidly urbanizing cities of the developing world. Most
governments have acknowledged the importance of municipal solid waste management.
However, rapid population growth overwhelms the capacity of most municipal
authorities to provide even the most basic services.
According to United Nations Development Programme survey of 151 mayors
of cities from around the world, the second most serious problem that a city faces
(after unemployment) is insufficient solid waste disposal1. Generally two-thirds of the
solid waste generated is not collected. The uncollected waste is dumped indiscriminately
in the streets and drains, contributing to flooding, breeding of insects, rodent vectors and
thus spreading of diseases. Often waste collected is disposed off in uncontrolled
dumpsites or burned, polluting water resources and the air.
A number of Indian cities adopt the practice of dumping of wastes in open landfill
sites. The land for this purpose is becoming difficult to obtain and most of the existing
sites have reached the limits. The legal and illegal dumps are chocking the land mass and
rising the heights of landfill sites. Since the last fifty years, dumping sites in Indian cities
have occupied as much space as 20,000 hectares2. In New Delhi 16 landfills sites have
filled up already and existing sites (Bhalswa, Gazipur and Okhla) have reached saturation
1 Da Zhu, P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, Improving MunicipalSolid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 1 (The InternationalBank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008).
2 Gupta, Rakhi, “Decentralized Model of Domestic Solid Waste Management: A Case Study of KarkeshNagar, New Delhi”, Spatio Economic Development Record, Vol.5, No.3 (May-June 1998).
108
point and are over flowing. About 95 per cent of the waste is being disposed off at the
landfills sites, remaining five per cent only go to the process.
There are potential risks for human health and environment from inefficient
collection and unscientific disposal of municipal solid waste. Direct health risk expose
mainly to the sanitary workers and rag pickers. By working in the most unhygienic,
unsafe and vulnerable environment, rag pickers are really providing a great unthankful
service to the society at the cost of their life. For the general public, the main risks to the
health are indirect and arise from the breeding of disease vectors causing the transfer of
pollution to water, air and land resources.
There are three main components (collection, transportation and disposal) of
waste management and these three lacked in terms of infrastructure, maintenance and
upgradation. The weakest link in the whole chain of management is the collection of
waste. Infrastructure related to garbage collection and disposal is not as per their
requirements, which further aggravate the problem. Urban local bodies, which are
entrusted with the responsibility of garbage disposal, are not in position to perform their
duties because of weak institutional and financial constraints. Lack of appropriate space,
funds and adequate technical knowhow are other bottle necks.
The problems of solid waste disposal are compounding every day as amount of
waste generation is increasing and area available for dumping is shrinking. Neither, the
waste generation can be stopped completely nor the given space can be enhanced.
Landfill sites are overflowing, insanity conditions are prevailing near open sites, stray
animals and rag pickers roaming around the waste receptacles. Non collection of garbage
becomes breeding ground for vectors, rodents, mosquitoes, flies and pathogenic micro
organisms posing severe health hazards3.
Today the composition of municipal solid waste has changed in such a manner
that a major proposition of the waste is composed of non-biodegradable materials.
The present system of recycling of plastic, glass, metal, paper etc., is largely informal.
This category of waste can be recycled or disposed off through special processes. Due to
these reasons, the task of handling solid waste becomes a highly specialized managerial task.
3 Subhash Anand, Solid Waste Management, 6-7 (Mittal Publications: New Delhi, 1st Edn., 2010).
109
Environmental degradation of urban ecosystem and the growing awareness of the
people will put more and more pressure on municipal authorities to find out sustainable
solution to the acute problem. Sustainable solid waste management requires not only
efficient collection, proper disposal but also waste reduction, reuse, recycle and resource
recovery. The important aspects which require priority are to improve the management
and organizational capability and enhance people’s participation and the handling of
waste in appropriate manners. The overall goal of the waste management program must
be for waste minimization, maximization of resource recovery and protection of
environmental quality. Today, there is a need to adopt proper waste management
techniques which would be cost-effective, scientifically better, technically sound,
financially viable, aesthetically beautiful, environmental friendly and socially acceptable
to people.
4.2 Concept of Solid Waste
Waste arises during all human activities such as production, distribution,
consumption and even leisure. A society receives energy and raw materials as inputs
from the environment and generates solid waste as output to the environment.
4.2.1 Waste
The term waste connotes a material of negligible value together with a desire to
discard it from its original environment. The material items which are generated at the
houses and discarded from different other places that no longer need or do not have any
further use and tend to throw them away may be termed as waste.
According to Basel Convention of the United Nations Environment Programme,
wastes are “Substances or objects which are disposed of or are intended to be disposed of
or are required to be disposed of by the provisions of national law”4.
United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) of the United Nations Environment
Programme defines wastes as, “Waste are materials that are not prime products (that is
products produced for markets) for which the generator has no further use in terms of
4 Baker, Elaine et al., Vital Waste Graphics, 6 (United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi,Kenya, 2004).
110
his/her own purposes of production, transformation or consumption and of which he/she
wants to dispose. Wastes may be generated during the extraction of raw materials, the
processing of raw materials into intermediate and final products, the consumption of final
products and other human activities. Residual recycled are reused at the place of
generation are excluded”5.
Environmental Encyclopaedia defines waste as “When any material exhausted off
its utility capacity and causes a problem due to its aesthetic and environmental reason is
considered as waste”.
Waste is defined as “Any material that is not useful and does not represent any
economic value to its owner, the owner being the waste generator”6.
4.2.2 Solid Waste
Solid waste can be defined as “non-liquid material that no longer has any value to
the person who is responsible for it. The words rubbish, garbage, trash or refuse are often
used as synonyms when talking about solid waste”7.
Florida Public Law defines solid waste as “Sludge unregulated under the Federal
Clean Water Act or Clean Air Act; Sludge from a waste treatment works, water supply
treatment plant, or air pollution control facility or garbage, rubbish, refuse, special waste or
other discarded material, including solid, liquid, semi-solid or contained gaseous material
resulting from domestic, industrial, commercial, agricultural or governmental operations”8.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of US defines “Solid waste means any
garbage or refuse; sludge from a wastewater treatment plant, water supply treatment
plant, or air pollution control facility; and other discarded material, including solid,
5 M.S Bhatt and Asheref Illiyan, Solid Waste Management - An Indian Perspective, 150 (Synergy BooksIndia: New Delhi, 1st Edn., 2012).
6 Available at: http://www.seas.columbia.edu/earth/wtert/sofos/velasco_thesis.pdf, (visited on 10.09.2014).7 Da Zhu,P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, Improving Municipal
Solid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 3 (TheInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008).
8 Available at, https://www.flrules.org/gateway/RuleNo.asp?title=SOLID%20WASTE%20MANAGEMENT%20 FACILITIES &ID=62-701.200, (visited on 10.09.2014).
111
liquid, semisolid, or contained gaseous material resulting from industrial, commercial,
mining and agricultural operations and from community activities9.
Cointreau (1982) defined, “solid waste as organic and inorganic waste materials
produced by households, commercial, institutional and industrial activities, which have
lost their value in the eyes of the first owner”10.
4.3 Classification of Solid Waste
Solid waste is usually categorized as per their sources, composition, processing
potential and environmental consideration. A general classification is:
“Household wastes” derived from residential neighbourhoods is the largest
component of urban solid waste. It consists of a large number of various elements
difficult to separate such as food and garden waste, paper, plastic cardboard, glass,
leather, old clothes, furniture, vegetable peach, egg shells, newspaper and magazines.
“Commercial wastes” consists of shops, restaurants, hotels, business establishment,
market wastes varied in totally but each specific sources may have only one type of waste
material.
“Institutional wastes” generate from government offices, religious centres’,
schools, colleges, universities. Generally it contains a large amount of paper and other
light material.
“Hospital wastes” is produced during diagnosis, treatment or immunization of
human beings and in research activities and testing of biological. It includes sharps,
disposables, anatomical waste, discarded medicine, chemicals. These are in the form of
disposable syringe, bandages, fluids, human excreta etc. This type of waste is highly
infectious and can be a serious threat to human health if it is not managed in proper and
scientific manner.
“Industrial wastes” derived from enterprises such as packing materials, leather
products, wool and textile factories and assembly enterprises for imported goods. This
9 Available at, http://www.epa.gov/agriculture/lrca.html, (visited on 10.09.2014).10 Available at, http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/4180/7/07_chapter%201.pdf, (visited
on 10.09.2014).
112
waste tends to be specific to the city concerned and linked to local natural resources
forming the basis for local industry.
“Non-Biodegradable wastes” are those materials which cannot be degraded,
which require artificial means of processing to reduce its amount and are not perishable.
It includes papers, cardboard, packing, pouches cassettes, computers disc, printer
cartridges, discarded clothes, furniture and equipments, light bulbs, tube lights, paints etc.
“Bio-degradable wastes” includes those wastes which reduce biologically, such as
food waste, flowers, fruit waste, garden waste, kitchen waste etc.
“Compostable wastes” are those wastes on which the micro-organisms can feed
and reduce the quantity with the help of biological processes. Such wastes can act as
good nutrient fertilizers for vegetative cover without disturbing the eco-system.
“Combustible wastes” includes those materials which can be burned downed or
inflamed in order to properly dispose them off although the residue remains of very small
percentage is left behind and can be mixed with the soil.
“Inert wastes” includes the wastes, which does not react with any chemical
composition and hence retain their present nature of composition, even, if they all
dumped in to the soil or set ablaze11.
4.4 Municipal Solid Waste
The term “municipal solid waste” refers to solid waste from houses, streets and
public places, shops, offices and hospitals. Management of these types of waste is most
often the responsibility of municipal or other governmental authorities. Although solid
waste from industrial processes is generally not considered municipal waste, it nevertheless
needs to be taken into account when dealing with solid waste because it often ends up in
the municipal solid waste stream12.
The term “municipal solid waste” includes the waste stream for the areas of
residential, commercial, institutional, industrial and construction. However, the definition
11 Subhash Anand, Solid Waste Management, 90-91 (Mittal Publications: New Delhi, 1st Edn., 2010).12 Da Zhu,P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, Improving Municipal
Solid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 3 (TheInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008).
113
varies greatly among waste studies and some sources are commonly excluded such as
industrial and hazardous waste often, only residential refuse is considered as municipal
waste. Generally, municipal solid waste is a heterogeneous mixture of paper, plastic,
cloth, metal, glass and organic matter etc., generated from various sources.
According to Section 3 (xv) of the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and
Handling) Rules 2000 “Municipal solid waste” includes commercial and residential
wastes generated in municipal or notified areas in either solid or semi-solid form
excluding industrial hazardous wastes but including treated bio-medical wastes13.
According to the World Bank 1994, municipal solid waste includes refuse from
the institution, market waste, yard waste and street sweepings. The street waste is also
included in the municipal solid waste.
According to Municipal Corporation Delhi, municipal solid waste consists of
household waste, construction and demolition debris, sanitation residue and waste from
streets; this garbage is generated mainly from residential and commercial complexes.
Municipal solid waste is defined as any waste generated by household, commercial and
institutional activities and is not hazardous14.
The volume of municipal solid waste generated per person is generally much
higher in wealthy industrially developed urban areas, than the poorer rural areas.
High income countries generate 300 to 1000 kg’s waste per person each year while low
income nations generate between 100 to 200 kg’s per person per year. Municipal solid
waste comprises two types of materials, refuse and thrash. Refuse includes garbage and
rubbish. Garbage contains highly decomposable food waste. Rubbish contains mostly
dry, non-putrescible items such as glass, rubber, metals and slowly decomposable or
combustible materials such as paper, textiles or wood objects. Trash includes bulky waste
materials that generally require special handling15. Table 4.1 shows the “classification of
materials comprising municipal solid waste”.
13 Available at: http://www.moef.nic.in/legis/hsm/mswmhr.html, (visited on 11.09.2014).14 Available at, http://www.seas.columbia.edu/earth/wtert/sofos/velasco_thesis.pdf, (visited on 10.09.2014).15 Subhash Anand, Solid Waste Management, 92-93 (Mittal Publications: New Delhi, 1st Edn., 2010).
114
TABLE 4.1
Materials Comprising Municipal Solid Waste16
Component Description
Food Wastes
The animal, fruit or vegetable residues (also called garbage) resultingfrom the handling, preparation, cooking and eating of foods. Becausefood wastes are putrescible, they will decompose rapidly, especiallyin warm weather.
Rubbish
Combustible and non-combustible solid wastes excluding food wastesare other putrescible materials; typically, combustible rubbish consistsof materials such as paper, cardboard, plastics, textiles, rubber,leather, wood, furniture and garden trimmings. Non-combustiblerubbish consists of items such as glass, crockery, tin cans, ferrous,non-ferrous metals, dirt and construction wastes.
Ashes andResidues
Materials remaining from the burning of wood, coal, coke and othercombustible waste. Residues from power plants are normally notincluded in this category. Ashes and residues are normally composedof powdery materials, cinders, clinkers and small amounts of burnedand partially burned materials.
Demolition andConstructionWastes
Wastes from razed buildings and other structures are classified asdemolition wastes. Wastes from the construction, remodelling andrepairing of residential, commercial and industrial buildings areclassified as construction wastes. Theses wastes may include dirt,stones, concrete, bricks, plaster and plumping heating and electricalparts.
Special WastesWastes such as street sweeping, road side litter, catch-basin debris,dead animals and abandoned vehicles are classified as special wastes.
Treatment PlantsWastes
The solid and semi-solid waste from water, waste water and industrialwaste treatment facilities are included in the classification.
4.5. Waste Characterization
Solid waste stream should be characterized by their source, by types of waste
produced as well as by generation rates and composition. Correct information in these
areas is necessary in order to monitor and review of existing waste management system.
16 Moitra. M, “Management of Solid Waste; Key to Sustainable Development”, SPA Newsletter onHuman Settlement, Vol.3, No.3-4 (Jan-Jun, 1996).
115
Hence, it is important to explain the composition of municipal solid waste in a clear
and consistent manner. Overall municipal solid waste generated in urban areas varies
45-75 percent organic materials. The contribution of non-degradable waste is higher in
cities of highly developed world as compared to developing world, but the organic waste
is higher in developing countries. The type of waste generated is also influenced by
geographical locations, land use pattern, functional activities, economic conditions and
policy of government. With the rising urbanization per-capita income and change in the
lifestyle and food habits, the amount of municipal solid waste has been increasing rapidly
and its composition also changing. Over the last few years, the consumer style has grown
rapidly leading to products being packed in cans, aluminium foils, plastics and other such
non-biodegradable items that cause incalculable harm to the environment.
The organic content of Indian city refuse is much higher due to practice of eating
fresh vegetables and fruits as compared to consumption of tinned and prepared food in
developed countries17. In municipal solid waste, after bio-degradable materials the second
larger component is the inert material usually consisting of silt, construction, debris and
other inert rubbish.
4.5.1 Physical composition of waste
Municipal solid waste is a heterogeneous mixture of paper, plastic, cloth, metal,
glass and organic matter etc., generated from households, street, commercial establishment
and market. The composition of waste plays a very significant role in the formulation of the
waste management plans.
Composition of refuse from some of the Indian cities like Kolkata, Delhi, Chennai
and Hyderabad show that the urban waste is heterogeneous in character. In this waste,
combustible waste was highest (48%) in Chennai and lowest in Delhi with only 35%.
Ash was found maximum in Delhi and Hyderabad. Chennai waste had rich quantity of
carbon contents, while it was lacking in Delhi and Hyderabad. Among these four cities,
waste of Delhi had no value of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium.
17 Holmes, R. (ed.) Managing Solid Waste in Developing Countries, (John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1984).
116
4.5.2 Chemical composition of Waste
Generally all middle and low income countries have a high percentage of
combustible organic matter in the urban waste stream, ranging from 40-85% of total.
China and India diverge from this trend as they traditionally use coal as a household fuel
source. The ash that is subsequently produced is very dense and tends to dominate the
waste stream in terms of weight18.
In Indian society, waste is dominated by organic materials due to their general
vegetarian habits. Women do not throw the old clothes; they rather exchange it for
stainless steel utensils and crockery. The chemical contents in the waste stream place
crucial role in the decomposition process.
4.6 Impact of Improper Municipal Solid Waste Management
A guidance note titled “Municipal Solid Waste Management on a Regional
Basis”, by the Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD), Government of India observes
that “Compliance with the Municipal Solid Waste Management Rules 2000 requires that
appropriate systems and infrastructure facilities be put in place to undertake scientific
collection, management, processing and disposal of municipal solid waste. However,
authorities are unable to implement and sustain separate and independent projects to
enable scientific collection, management, processing and disposal of municipal solid
waste. This is mainly due to lack of financial and technical expertise and scarcity of
resources, such as land and manpower”19.
Improper solid waste management deteriorates public health, degrades quality of
life and pollutes air, water and land resources. It also causes global warming, climate
change and impacts the entire planet. Improper waste management is also identified as a
cause of 22 human diseases20 and results in numerous premature deaths every year.
18 Subhash Anand, Solid Waste Management, 116 (Mittal Publications: New Delhi, 1st Edn., 2010).19 Ranjith Kharvel Annepu, Sustainable Solid Waste Management in India, 53 (Columbia university:
New York, 2012).20 Available at: http://web.mit.edu/urbanupgrading/urbanenvironment/resources/references/pdfs/WhatAWaste
Asia .pdf, (visited on 11.09.2014).
117
4.6.1 Unsanitary Land filling (Dumping)
Majority of the municipal solid waste collected in India is disposed off on open
land or in unsanitary landfills. This is in addition to the irregular and incomplete waste
collection and transportation in many cities, which leaves municipal solid waste on the
streets. Many municipalities in India have not yet identified landfill sites in accordance
with Municipal Solid Waste Rules 2000. In several municipalities, existing landfill sites
have been exhausted and the respective local bodies do not have resources to acquire new
land. Such lack of landfill sites decreases municipal solid waste collection efficiency21.
Unsanitary land filling pollutes ground and surface waters, emits green house gases and other
organic aerosols and pollutes the air. Pests and other vectors sitting on improperly disposed
solid wastes is a nuisance and above that a breeding ground for disease causing organisms.
4.6.2 Open Burning, Landfill Fires and Air Quality Deterioration
Open burning is the burning of any matter in such a manner that products of
combustion resulting from the burning are emitted directly into the ambient air without
passing through an adequate stack, duct or chimney. Open burning of wastes is practiced
all over India due to reasons like, open burning by waste-pickers for recovery of metals
from mixed wastes; open burning in bins by municipal workers or residents to empty
municipal solid waste collection bins; open burning of plastic wastes by street dwellers
for warmth at night.
In addition to open burning of wastes, landfill fires are also common at every
landfill in India. They are caused due to the build-up of heat inside waste beds due to
decomposing (aerobic or un-aerobic) organic matter. Sometimes, these fires continue for
weeks at a stretch, even after long showers.
Air Emissions from Open Burning and Landfill Fires
A study by National Environmental Engineering Research Institute in 2010, “Air
Quality Assessment, Emissions Inventory and Source Apportionment Studies: Mumbai”22
found that open burning and landfill fires are a major source of air pollution in Mumbai.
21 Available at: http://www.pppinindia.com/pdf/dea_ppp_criticality_legal.pdf, (visited on 11.09.2014).22 Available at: http://www.moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/Rpt-air-monitoring-17-01-2011.
pdf, (visited on 11.09.2014).
118
The study found that about two per cent of the total municipal solid waste generated in
Mumbai is openly burnt on the streets and 10 per cent of the total municipal solid waste
generated is burnt in landfills by humans or due to landfill fires.
In Mumbai, open burning of municipal solid waste is the largest emitter of carbon
monoxide(CO), particulate matter (PM), carcinogenic hydrocarbons (HC) and nitrous
oxides (NOX), among activities that do not add to the economy of the city; the second
largest emitter of hydrocarbons (HC); the second largest emitter of particulate matter
(PM); the fourth largest emitter of carbon monoxide compared to all emissions sources in
Mumbai; and the third largest emitter of CO, PM and HC combined together in
comparison to all emission sources in the city.
Dioxins/Furans Emissions
Dioxins and Furans are known carcinogenic agents; they can cause cancer in case
of long term exposure. The risk of exposure to dioxins/furans is considerably increased
due to the fact that municipal solid waste is burnt on the streets and landfills which are at
ground level, releasing them directly into ambient surroundings. Also, open burning is a
frequent occurrence in some communities and landfill fires, once started, go on for weeks
at a stretch, increasing human exposure further. During health studies conducted in
Kolkata23, waste pickers who are regularly exposed to landfill fire emissions for longer
periods were found to have a “Chromosome Break” incidence which was 12 times higher
than the control population. Chromosome Break often leads to cancer. Municipality
workers were also found to have higher incidence of Chromosome Break compared to
control population, but less than that of waste pickers.
4.6.3 Water Pollution
Unsanitary landfills can contaminate ground and surface water resources when the
leachate produced percolates through the soil strata into the groundwater underneath or is
washed as runoff during rains. Leachate is generally a strong reducing liquid formed
23 Arun Kanti Biswas, Sunil Kumar, S. Satheesh Babu, Jayanta Kumar Bhattacharyya and TapanChakrabarti, “Studies on environmental quality in and around municipal solid waste dumpsite”,Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 55, Issue 2 (2010) P. 129-134.
119
under methanogenic (anaerobic) conditions. The characteristics of leachate depend on the
content of various constituents in the dumped waste.
“Studies on Environmental Quality in and around Municipal Solid Waste
Dumpsite” in Kolkata, by Biswas A.K., et al.24 found moderately high concentrations of
heavy metal in groundwater surround the dumpsite. The study found out that the
groundwater quality has been significantly affected by leachate percolation. Leachate
generally contains organic chemicals formed by anaerobic digestion of organic wastes
and heavy metals leached from inorganic wastes. The heavy metals generally observed in
leachate are Lead (Pb), Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr) and Nickel (Ni). All these heavy
metals are characterized as toxic for drinking water. Due to the reducing property of
leachate, during percolation through soil strata, it reacts with Iron (Fe) and Manganese
(Mn) species underground and reduces them into more soluble species, thus increasing
their concentrations in groundwater. Such reactions when they occur, pose a serious
drinking water toxic risk.
4.6.4 Land Degradation and Scarcity
Land filling of municipal solid waste is a common waste management practice
and one of the cheapest methods for organized waste management in many parts of the
world. This practice of unsanitary land filling not only occupies precious land resources
near urban areas; it also degrades the quality of land and soil in the site. Presence of
plastics and heavy metals in the soils make it unfit for agriculture and emissions of
methane and structural instability of the land make it unfit for construction activities.
Land filling occupies vast amount of lands near urban areas. A 1998 study by The Energy
Resources Institute, earlier Tata Energy Research Institute (TERI), titled ‘Solid Waste
Management in India: options and opportunities’25 calculated the amount of land that was
occupied by all the waste that was generated in India, post-independence, until 1997.
Based on a Business As Usual (BAU) scenario of 91 percent land filling, the study
24 Arun Kanti Biswas, Sunil Kumar, S. Satheesh Babu, Jayanta Kumar Bhattacharyya and TapanChakrabarti, “Studies on environmental quality in and around municipal solid waste dumpsite”,Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 55, Issue 2 (2010) P. 129-134.
25 Shuchi Gupta, Krishna Mohan, Rajkumar Prasad, Sujata Gupta and Arun Kansal, “Solid wastemanagement in India: options and opportunities”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 24,Issue 2, (November 1998) P. 137-154.
120
estimates that the waste generated in 2001 has occupied 237.4 sq.km or an area half the
size of Mumbai; by 2011 would have occupied 379.6 sq.km or more than 218,000
football fields or 90 per cent of Chennai; by 2021 would need 590.1 sq.km which is
greater than the area of Hyderabad (583 sq.km)26.
The Position Paper on The Solid Waste Management Sector in India, published
by Ministry of Finance in 2009, estimates a requirement of more than 1400 sq.km of land
for solid waste disposal by the end of 2047 if municipal solid waste is not properly
handled. This area is equal to the area of Hyderabad, Mumbai and Chennai together27.
4.6.5 Public Health Crisis
The present level of solid waste management service in urban areas is a potential
threat to public health and environment. Inhalation of bio-aerosols and of smoke and
fumes produced by open burning of waste can cause health problems. Toxic materials
present in solid waste are determinants for respiratory and dermatological problems, eye
infections and low life expectancy28. The carbonaceous fractions and toxic elements like
Chromium (Cr), Lead (Pb), Zinc (Zn), etc. dominate the fine particle range. As most of
the fine particles can possibly enter the human respiratory systems, their potency for
health damage is high. Also, these fine particles from open burning which constitute
higher fractions of toxics are mostly released at ground level29. On comparing emissions
from open burning to the concentrations and composition of emissions causing indoor air
pollution due to bio-fuel burning inside homes, it can be concluded that emissions from
open burning also cause numerous premature deaths.
A less observed side effect of improper solid waste management in India is the
introduction of heavy metals into the food chain. Compost from mixed waste composting
plants is highly contaminated with heavy metals. Using this compost on agricultural
26 Available at: http://www.citymayors.com/statistics/largest-cities-density-125.html, (visited on 11.09.2014).27 Ranjith Kharvel Annepu, Sustainable Solid Waste Management in India, 64 (Columbia university:
New York, 2012).28 Bob Jan Schoot Uiterkamp, Hossein Azadi, Peter Ho, “Sustainable Recycling Model: A Comparative
Analysis Between India and Tanzania”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 55, Issue 3(2011) P. 344-355.
29 Available at: http://www.moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/Rpt-air-monitoring-17-01-2011.pdf, (visited on 11.09.2014).
121
fields will result in contamination of the agricultural soil with heavy metals. Food crops
grown on contaminated agricultural soils when consumed will introduce the heavy metals
into the food chain and lead to a phenomenon called "biomagnifications". Biomagnifications
is defined by United States Geological Survey (USGS) as the process whereby the tissue
concentrations of a contaminant (heavy metals) increase as it passes up the food chain
through two or more tropic levels (plants and humans or plants, cattle and humans).
Heavy metals generally found in mixed waste composts are Zinc (Zn), Copper (Cu),
Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Nickel (Ni) and Chromium (Cr).
Long-term exposure to these heavy metals through food can cause severe health
damage. Heavy metals in human body are known to cause damage to the central nervous
system and circulatory system, liver and kidney dysfunction, anaemia, stomach and
intestinal irritation and psychological and developmental changes in young children.
However additional research is required to properly understand the transport pathways of
heavy metals into human bodies through different agricultural crops and meat products.
Heavy metal contamination of groundwater due to leachate percolation below unsanitary
landfills can also cause biomagnifications of heavy metals in humans who drink water
from those sources. Further, long term exposure of populations surrounding dumpsites to
open waste disposal can lead to health problems. Ill health of municipal workers and
waste pickers means a threat to public health. Also, contagious diseases can spread
rapidly in densely populated Indian cities posing a bigger threat to public health.
Diseases caused due to stray animals, pests and insects attracted to wastes is a threat
to public health too. Sewers and drains clogged by solid waste are breeding grounds for
mosquitoes. Improper solid waste management in the city Surat caused a city-wide bubonic
plague epidemic in 1994, which later transformed Surat into one of the cleanliest cities in
India. Stray animals and insects carry other diseases like cholera and dengue fever30.
4.7 Management of Municipal Solid Wastes
In view of the serious environmental degradation resulting from the unscientific
disposal of municipal solid waste, the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF),
30 Available at: http://web.mit.edu/urbanupgrading/urbanenvironment/resources/references/pdfs/WhatAWasteAsia. pdf, (visited on 11.09.2014).
122
Government of India, has notified the ‘Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling)
Rules, 2000’ making it mandatory for urban local bodies to improve the systems of solid
waste management. These rules laid down procedures for waste collection, segregation,
storage, transportation, processing and disposal. Further, the rules mandate that all cities
should set up suitable waste treatment and disposal facilities by December 31, 2003 or earlier.
These rules also specify standards for compost quality, health control & management and
closure of land-fills.
4.7.1. Generation of Solid Waste
In the earlier times, population was small, needs were few and resources were
abundant, the generation of waste was such that it got naturally recycled, being mostly
bio-degradable. However, after the industrial revolution, the resources have been
recklessly used and there have been different types of wastes. In the management of
municipal solid waste, generation is basic fundamental aspects which change with
location, socio-economic and background of the people. The waste generation is increasing
day by day not only in big cities but also in smaller towns. Because of rapid population
growth and urbanization, there has been a significant increase in domestic, urban and
industrial waste in last few decades. In 1947, cities and towns in India generated as
estimated six million tonnes of solid waste which has been increased to forty eight
million tonnes after the 50 years in 199731. About 18percent is generated by six metro
cites of India. According to Central Pollution Control Board, 2006 the highest quantity of
municipal solid waste is being generated by Delhi among the ten metro cities of India,
followed by Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata. Hyderabad, Bangalore and Ahmadabad
occupy fifth, sixth and seventh position respectively.
It has been estimated that by 2030, India would generate 1, 25,000 million tonnes
of wastes. Domestic waste generation varies from 300 grams per capita per day to 2.5 kg’s
per capita per day throughout the world. From the year 1990 to 2000, quantity of waste
generation doubled from 160 million tonnes to 332 million tonnes in developing
countries. By 2025, cities would produce five times the waste, they produced today.
31 Subhash Anand, Solid Waste Management, 94 (Mittal Publications: New Delhi, 1st Edn., 2010).
123
4.7.2. Collection of Municipal Solid Waste
Collection includes temporary storage and containerization, transfer to a collection
vehicle and transports to a site where the waste undergoes processing and finally
disposes. Waste collection is the most expensive phase largely because it is labour
intensive. In addition, proper collection techniques are important to protect public health,
safety and environmental quality. Solid waste collection may be a local municipal
responsibility, whereby public employees and equipment are assigned to the task.
Different cities have various methods for the waste collection like community bin
collection, house to house collection on regular pre-informed timings and scheduling by
using bell ringing of musical vehicle etc., are few modes of them. Among the 25 cities
with a population of over one million, 17 have door-to-door collection systems in India.
Delhi is among the cities that have failed to introduce the door-to-door service32.
The waste is collected from residential, markets, institutions, open spaces, street
and other premises and taken to one of the storage facilities of various types. Urban local
bodies spend between Rupees 500 to 1500 per tonne on solid waste management of
which 60-70 percent on transportation and less than 5% on treatment and disposal.
Management of municipal solid waste aims at preventing litter on the streets.
Waste that is stored and segregated at households or other establishments needs to be
collected following a fixed schedule. Door-to-door collection also requires co-operation and
participation of citizens, who must bring their wastes to the door step when waste collectors
arrive. Collection vehicles must meet the requirements of local conditions. Therefore, an
assessment of the housing situation, street conditions and geographic and topographic
situation is always a pre requisite for efficient planning and decision making for primary
collection equipment. In general, primary waste collection can be done with slow and smaller
vehicles, which do not need to cover very long distances. Motorized vehicles are more
suitable in areas with less dense housing patterns, because the collectors will need to cover
long distances. Those vehicles are also suitable for hilly areas.
32 “Delhi Ranks Poorly in Solid Waste Management”, The Hindustan Times: Delhi, 21.02.2007).
124
Collection Frequency
In India, which has a hot and humid climate, organic bio-degradable waste degrades
easily, thereby producing odours and attracting vermin and disease vectors. Therefore,
bio-degradable waste needs to be collected every day. Dry waste (inorganic recyclables)
can be collected less frequently; however, collection at least once per week is advisable.
Daily collection service is very important in India. Women responsible for household
hygiene would not accept storage of waste in their home for more than 24 hours. When
collection is not provided on a daily basis, they discard waste on the streets. Shops and
establishment also do not accept storing waste for more than 24 hours33.
Options for Primary Collection
According to the Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules
2000, there are two options for the primary collection: door-to-door collection at preset
intervals or community bin collection (bring system)
Door-To-Door Collection
There are different options for door-to-door collection
Door-To-Door Collection carried out along with street sweeping
With this option, street sweepers are given containerized handcarts or
containerized tricycles. The vehicles have four to eight containers and a bell or a whistle.
Depending on the density of the streets, a road length of between 350 and 750 meters is
allotted to each sanitation worker for street sweeping. While sweeping the streets, sweepers
are also expected to do door-to-door collection of waste for the 150 to 250 houses situated on
the both sides of the streets they are allotted to sweep. They ring the bell or use the
whistle to announce their arrival and citizens are expected to bring out their waste.
33 Da Zhu,P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, Improving MunicipalSolid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 28 (TheInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008).
125
Door-to-Door collection by resident welfare associations and nongovernmental
organizations
Another option for door-to-door collection is to entrust the work to Resident
Welfare Associations (RWAs) or NGOs. Those organizations could be offered a
reasonable subsidy (such as Rs 10 per house per month) to assist them in appointing and
financing their own part-time sanitation workers for the door-to-door collection service.
RWAs or NGOs can be invited to submit applications and the agreement can be
established through a memorandum of understanding.
The RWA or NGO can appoint one part-time sanitation worker per 200
households for door-to-door collection. This individual will work for four hours in the
morning. Flexible hours can be fixed for shops and establishments. Sanitation workers
can be given a containerized tricycle with a bell or whistle to facilitate collection of waste
from the doorstep and should be paid at least minimum wage, as prescribed by the state
government for part-time workers. Ahmadabad, Hyderabad, Rajkot, Bangalore, Jaipur
and Chennai are cities where door-to-door collection services are carried out through
RWA, NGO and other private initiatives34.
Door-to-door collection by private waste collectors
A third option for providing door-to-door collection is to contract with the private
sector. Municipal authorities may prepare reasonably sized packages to make such
contracts viable. The contracts could be only for door-to-door collection or could also
include transport of waste.
Personalized door-to-door collection in high-income areas and compounds
High-income groups expect more personalized service and may not mind paying
higher fees for door-to-door collection. In such areas, sanitation workers will need to visit
and collect waste from each house in the area allotted to them. This system reduces the
productivity of labour, so more workers will be needed to cover the same number of
houses in a four-hour schedule. Hence, the cost of collection will be 30 to 40 percent
34 Da Zhu,P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, Improving MunicipalSolid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 28 (TheInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008).
126
higher. The higher cost justifies higher fees from such communities. The fees could be set
at rates that would help to subsidize collection in poor communities.
Community Bin Collection
In the past, community bins have not been well accepted by citizens. Bins have
not been emptied in time so they overflow, thereby causing an unhygienic situation. This
situation is made worse because citizens tend to throw waste at the bins from a distance
because they dislike coming too close. However, community bins are very effective for
collection and still can be used in selected situations. For instance, bins can be placed in
high-rise multi-story buildings, housing compounds, or slum areas. Essential for the
acceptance of community bins is their frequent emptying and cleaning to avoid nuisance
from litter, odour and animals. Community bins must be designed to allow easy access
for citizens, easy access for trucks, easy exchange or emptying and easy cleaning of the
area. Ideally, bins will not be emptied but exchanged by a clean and empty bin with a
truck. Optionally, those bins can be unloaded into a truck mechanically or manually,
depending on the mechanization adopted in the city35.
Primary Collection of Wastes from Societies/Complexes
In private societies, complexes and multi storied buildings, normally no sweepers
are provided by municipal corporation, hence private sweepers are generally engaged.
It may be therefore made compulsory for the management of the societies, complexes and
multi storied building to keep community bins or containers in which dry and wet waste
may be separately stored by the members. Such bins may be placed at an easily
approachable location to facilitate easy collection by the municipal staff or the
contractors engaged by the municipal corporation. The municipal corporation should
arrange to collect waste from these community bins/containers through handcarts, pick-
up vans, or other municipal waste collection vehicles as may be convenient. To facilitate
collection of waste from societies or commercial complexes, the municipal corporation
35 Da Zhu,P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, Improving MunicipalSolid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 30 (TheInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008).
127
should by a rule, make it obligatory for them to identify an appropriate site within their
premises for keeping such bin/container for the storage of waste36.
Collection of Waste from Slums
The municipal corporation should collect waste from slums through community
bins provided by the municipal corporation. Residents should bring their wastes from
their houses to community bins. They should bring their biodegradable waste to these
bins only an hour or two before the time of clearance. The municipal corporation may, if
so desired, engage a private contractor for collection of this waste.
Collection of Waste from Shops and Establishments
Shops and establishments normally open after 9 or 10 am. These timings do not
suitable with the usual work schedule of sweepers. Under this situation one of these three
alternatives shall be adopted.
1. Sweepers shall first carry out the work of street sweeping in the morning hours as
usual and soon thereafter take up the work of door-step collection of waste, after most
of the shops have opened. Waste collectors (rag pickers) shall be organized to collect
the recyclable waste from shops and establishments as soon as they opens, as most of
such waste is recyclable. The shops and establishments shall be asked to store waste
in two bins if they produce waste other than recyclable waste also.
2. The recyclable material received by the waste collectors directly from shops and
establishments would give them a better return. The waste would be dry and not
soiled and would fetch a good price in the market. This will work as an incentive for,
them to continue door- to door collection.
3. The associations of markets, shops and establishments shall be persuaded to organize
this service with the help of NGOs and rag pickers in their market37.
36 Project Report, “Strengthening Primary and Secondary Solid Waste Management in the city”, RajkotMunicipal Corporation, (Project period from 2005-06 to 2010-11), p-93.
37 Project Report, “Strengthening Primary and Secondary Solid Waste Management in the city”, RajkotMunicipal Corporation, (Project period from 2005-06 to 2010-11), p-94.
128
Collection of Waste from Hotel and Restaurant
The hotels and restaurants shall make their own arrangements for collection of
waste through their own association. The Municipal Corporation may extend help in
primary collection of such waste by deploying its own manpower and machinery for door
step collection of such waste on full cost-recovery basis. This doorstep service may be
contracted out by the municipal corporation if so desired. Charges for the collection of
hotel waste may depend upon the quantity of waste to be picked up from the hotels and
restaurants and frequency of collection required. The cost recovery may be planned
according to the classification of hotels/ restaurants made on the above basis and decided
in consultation with them.
Vegetable, Fruit, Meat Markets Waste
These wastes should be removed on a daily basis departmentally or through a
contractor on full or part-cost-recovery basis as may be deemed appropriate by the
municipal corporation. The large containers kept in the fruit and vegetable markets
should properly be emptied during non-peak hours and the waste from meat and fish
markets should be collected through a closed pick-up van service by engaging a
contractor as deemed expedient by the municipal corporation.
Collection of garden waste
The waste stored in public and private parks, gardens, lawn plots etc. should be
collected on a weekly basis by arranging a rotation for collecting such waste from
different areas, on different days to be notified to the people to enable them to trim the
trees and lawns accordingly and keep the waste ready. This waste shall be collected through a
contractor or department as deemed appropriate by the urban local authority. Cost recovery
shall be insisted upon, based on the volume of waste collected. The existing tractors may be
deployed for weekly collection of garden waste from different areas.
Collection of waste from marriage halls and community halls
A special pick up arrangement should be made for collection of waste from these
establishments daily on a full-cost-recovery basis. The cost of such collection could be
129
built into the charges for utilizing such halls. This service may be provided preferably
through a contractor or department, as the municipal corporation deems fit38.
Collection of construction and demolition waste
1. The municipal corporation should prescribe the rate per ton for the collection,
transportation and disposal of construction waste and debris and notify the same to
the people.
2. Every person who is likely to produce construction waste shall be required to deposit
with the municipal corporation an approximate amount in advance at the rates as may
be prescribed by the municipal corporation from time to time, for the removal and
disposal of construction waste from his premises by the municipal corporation.
3. Such amount shall be deposited at the- time when the building permission is being
sought and in cases where such permission is not required, at any time before such
waste is produced.
4. The charges for removal of construction waste to be doubled for those who fail to
deposit the amount in advance.
5. To facilitate the collection of small quantities of construction and demolition waste
generated in the city, suitable sites shall be identified in various parts of the city and
notified people to deposit small quantities of construction and demolition waste.
Containers could be provided at such locations and small collection charge levied for
receiving such waste at such sites and for its onward transportation. Rates shall be
prescribed for such collection by the municipal corporation. Contracts could be given
for managing such sites.
Dairy and cattle-shed waste
The dairies and cattle breeders having sheds within the city limits should be asked
to move the cattle sheds outside the city limits. Such waste producers should be directed
not to stack the cow dung or other stable wastes within their premises or on the roadside
for future use or for sale as it creates unsanitary conditions. They must, therefore, transfer
38 Project Report, “Strengthening Primary and Secondary Solid Waste Management in the city”, RajkotMunicipal Corporation, (Project period from 2005-06 to 2010-11), p-95.
130
the waste produced by them daily into the specified municipal storage containers nearby,
which should be provided by the corporation to avoid unhygienic conditions.
4.7.3 Storage of Municipal Solid Wastes
Solid waste collected from the doorstep through the primary collection system has to
be stored at a convenient place for its onward transport in a cost-effective manner. In general,
further waste handling should follow the principle of “Do not handle waste twice!”39
Storage Depots
Municipal authorities need to dispense with open waste storage depots and to
replace concrete cylindrical bins and missionary bins, which are inefficient and
unhygienic, with neat, mobile covered containers. They should identify suitable locations,
preferably from among the existing locations of waste storage depots in the city, where
large containers ranging from three cubic meters to seven cubic meters could be placed
for secondary storage of waste. The number of containers required will depend on the
area of the city and its population.
A waste collector with a handcart should not be expected to walk more than
250 meters. Therefore, containers should be available within a radius of 250 metres.
At least four containers per square kilometre need to be placed. In high-density areas, one
container should be placed for every 5,000 to 10,000 residents, depending on the size of
the container. A three cubic meter container will hold 1.25 to 1.50 metric tons of waste,
just enough for a population of 5,000 whereas, a container of seven cubic meter capacity
can easily handle the waste of a population of 10,000 to 12,000. In highly spread-out
areas, the municipalities may use their discretion in placing containers to facilitate an
appropriate secondary storage system in a cost-effective manner. The containers could
either be taken directly to the disposal site if the distance is shorter than 15 kilometres or
might be taken to a transfer station if the distance is longer40.
39 Da Zhu,P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, Improving MunicipalSolid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 33-34 (TheInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008).
40 Da Zhu,P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, Improving MunicipalSolid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 35 (TheInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008).
131
Transfer Stations
In cities where the treatment and disposal site is more than 15 kilometres away
from the city, transfer stations might be appropriate. Waste is transferred from small
vehicles into larger container trucks so that waste can be transported more efficiently
over long distances. It would be uneconomic to transport small quantities of waste to a
long-distance haul. The following might be considered:
1. The transfer station needs to be so designed that waste can directly be
transferred into a large vehicle or container.
2. Large vehicles or containers with a capacity of 20 to 30 cubic meters are typically
used for long-distance waste transport to a treatment and disposal site.
3. The design and capacity of transfer stations and storage equipment strongly
depends on the waste quantity and on vehicles used for primary and secondary
waste.
Municipal authorities should very carefully select the site of transfer station.
One or more transfer stations in each city can facilitate optimum use of the fleet of small
vehicles and can take optimum advantage of large hauling vehicles for bulk transport of
waste. Transfer stations should be decentralized within the city, allocated to an enclosed
area and situated in the general direction of the main landfill site. The timings of the
transfer station should match with the timings of waste transport from the city so that
direct transfer of waste from a small vehicle to a large vehicle is possible. This arrangement
can be facilitated by a split-level transfer station, where a small vehicle can go over a
ramp and directly tip into a large vehicle. However, if direct transfer of waste from a
small vehicle to a large vehicle is inconvenient, the municipal authority could also plan a
transfer station at which waste is initially deposited in a large bunker and later moved
using special equipment such as a grabbing machine. The contents could then be lifted
into a large vehicle at any time during the day. Such an arrangement necessitates multiple
handling but has the flexibility to allow the transfer of waste any time during the day41.
41 Da Zhu, P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, Improving MunicipalSolid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 35 36 (TheInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008).
132
4.7.4 Transportation of Municipal Solid Waste
Transportation of waste from collection centre to final disposal site is a crucial
step in solid waste management. In fact, transportation is a link between the collection
and disposal of garbage on the land fill sites and for this, proper vehicles and equipments
are required. A transfer station is a facility at which solid wastes from individual
collection trucks are consolidated into large vehicles, such as tractor-trailer units. Waste
transportation services are carried out by the municipalities employing vehicles like open
trucks, tractor-trailer, dumper etc. The most expensive aspect in solid waste management
is the cost incurred in transporting the garbage to disposal ground42.
The main types of modern vehicle used for transportation are Refuse Removal Trucks
(RRT), Loaders, Mini Dumpers, Tractor-Trailer and also Bullock Carts in rural areas43.
1. RRT: These are ordinary trucks tipped with hydraulic tipping facilities, have a
capacity of about 8 cu meters and can lift about 4 tonnes of solid wastes.]
2. Refuse Collector: These are modern special trucks with hydraulic compaction and
loading facility and have a capacity of 14 cu meters and carry 8 tonnes of load.
3. Mini Refuse Collectors: These are smaller versions of the refuse collector, have a
capacity of 6 cu meters and can carry 3-4 tonnes of load.
4. Dumper: These are trucks fitted with a crane like facility which can lift filled dumper
bin and replace them after emptying. The average weight lifted by dumper is around
2.5 tonnes.
5. Tractor: These usually operate for short hand and have a capacity of 3-4 tonnes.
6. Loaders: These are special machines with a mechanical device to clear the bins and
load the wastes on the trucks.
7. Animal Drawn Cart: These are used in rural areas. It is least polluting and very
economical. These usually engaged to collect waste from narrow lanes and transport
it to transfer stations from where it carried by a larger vehicle.
42 Subhash Anand, Solid Waste Management, 136-137 (Mittal Publications: New Delhi, 1st Edn., 2010).43 Ansari, J. H., “Solid Waste Management in Delhi- Need for Partnership Management”, 27th National
Congress Paper (19-22 September 1999).
133
4.7.5 Processing of Municipal Solid Wastes
Waste processing and treatment is the physical, chemical or biological conversion
of the waste for resource recovery, energy recovery and any other beneficial purposes.
These include composting, vermi-composting, incineration and gasification etc.44.
According to Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules 2000 the
municipal authority shall adopt suitable technology or combination of such technologies
to make use of wastes so as to minimize burden on landfill45.
The treatment practices to be adopted by urban local bodies in India are:
1. Composting-Aerobic
a. Vermi Composting
b. Windrow Composting
2. Bio Methanation–Anaerobic
3. Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF)–Pelletisation
4. Waste to Energy methods-Power generation through Incineration
The composting is the preferred method for disposal / treatment for the bio-
degradable waste. However, there is another disposal method in the form of using it for
energy production through different technologies available as on now. The pelletisation
route has the advantage of safe disposal of garbage and a source of renewable energy. But
the technical feasibility of undertaking such an activity depends on many factors
including the quantity of biodegradable waste available and the additives which can be
permitted to be used etc. While selecting the technology for composting, it should be kept
in mind that the final product is going to be used as manure and therefore it should adhere
to the requirement supporting its use in production of food items because the manure is
going to be used for production of food grains / vegetables etc46.
44 Subhash Anand, Solid Waste Management, 180 (Mittal Publications: New Delhi, 1st Edn., 2010).45 Schedule – II of the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules 2000, available at:
http://www. moef.nic.in/legis/hsm/mswmhr.html, (visited on 12.09.2014).46 Ready Reckoner, “Municipal Solid Waste Management for Urban Local Bodies”, Commissionerate of
Municipal Administration: Chennai, (November 2008), p. 28.
134
Composting
Composting is a natural biological process in which organic material is broken
down by the action of micro-organisms. Typical materials suitable for composting
include, green waste and putrescible wastes with pre sorting and screening to remove non
compostable, plus other enriched organic waste streams (sewage sludge, agricultural,
food processing wastes)47.
In the 2000 Municipal Solid Waste Management Rules, ‘Composting’ is defined
as a controlled process involving microbial decomposition of organic matter under
aerobic conditions. Biodegradable waste is converted to a soil-like substance (compost),
which is a valuable soil amendment and fertilizer. India has a well-established composting
community with a wealth of experience in composting. However, only a few municipalities
have adopted composting as a treatment option in their solid waste management strategy.
Many composting initiatives are not formally linked to the official system and, therefore,
struggle with organizational, financial and institutional problems48.
Vermi-Composting
Vermi-Composting is a bio oxidation and stabilization process of organic matter
that involves the joint action of earthworms and bio organisms and does not involve
thermophilic agent. In this process the organic waste gets breakdown and fragmented by
earthworms resulting in a stable non toxic material with good humus material that can be
used as a soil conditioner. The earthworms are in fact, used in this process as the agents
for turning fragmentation and aeration. In this process it is absolutely necessary to
segregate the solid waste. The earthworms require moist conditions and hence large
quantity of water is required in this process and no water logging is permitted.
This is the process by which decayed organic matter is eaten by a mix of bacteria,
fungi and bacteria inside the bodies of earth worms, to convert waste to a digested soil
47 Ready Reckoner, “Municipal Solid Waste Management for Urban Local Bodies”, Commissionerate ofMunicipal Administration: Chennai, (November 2008), p. 28.
48 Da Zhu, P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, ImprovingMunicipal Solid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 39(The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC,2008).
135
like excretion and Vermi-Castings full of microbes useful to farmers. Earthworms are not
pests like caterpillars and do not eat fresh food wastes. There are two stages in the
process of Vermi-Composting; Initial decomposition of the waste and later its conversion
by earthworms. Mixed waste cannot be used for Vermi-Composting as toxic substances
can kill the earthworms. Only segregated wastes or domestic food waste can be
composted through this process49.
Windrow Composting
Windrow composting is an established technology for dealing with green wastes,
where the material is piled in elongated rows and aerated through either turning of the
windrows or through air forced through the material. This may take place in buildings or
externally. In this process the waste is received and stacked in long windrows of 2to3m
wide and 1to 1.50m high. The dimensions would vary depending on the volume of waste
to be handled per day. The windrows can be treated with slurry substrate of bio enzymes
/effective microorganisms for de-odour and for achieving accelerated bioconversion of
organic matter in the waste. Due to exothermic reactions, the temperature of the windrow
reaches about 55 ºto 65º within 36 hours and kills the pathogens. It also accelerates the
fermentation. The moisture level of about 50% to 60% shall be maintained during the
process. After every 5 day’s interval, aeration is carried out by turning the windrows with
the help of any suitable mechanical equipment like front loader/by manually. As the
fermentation progresses, the organic biomass changes colour to dark humus like
substances and its volume is reduced to about 50%.The fermentation is completed within
five weeks. The well decomposed biomass is processed in separating, grading and sieving
machines. In the process, foul smell is eliminated at the initial stage and the pathogens
are killed by bio enzymes induced exothermic heat and the waste becomes free from
flies, mosquitoes and insect vectors50.
49 Ready Reckoner, “Municipal Solid Waste Management for Urban Local Bodies”, Commissionerate ofMunicipal Administration: Chennai, (November 2008), p. 29.
50 Ready Reckoner, “Municipal Solid Waste Management for Urban Local Bodies”, Commissionerate ofMunicipal Administration: Chennai, (November 2008), p. 30.
136
Bio Methanation
In this process, the organic fraction of wastes is segregated and fed into a closed
container (biogas digester) where, under anaerobic conditions, the organic wastes
undergo bio-degradation producing methane-rich biogas and effluent/ sludge. The biogas
can be utilized either for cooking/ heating applications, or through dual fuel or gas
engines or gas / steam turbines for generating motive power or electricity. The sludge
from anaerobic digestion, after stabilization, can be used as a soil conditioner, or even
sold as manure depending upon its composition, which is determined mainly by the
composition of the input waste51.
Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF)- Pelletisation
Pelletisation is a physical process which brings about resource recovery from
waste. It consists of various steps like mechanical lifting of waste, Removal of non-
combustible and Recyclables fractions, drying of the combustible fraction, Size
reduction, Ingredient mixing and Production of fuel pellets52. The process of conversion
of garbage into fuel pellets involves primarily drying, separation of combustibles from
garbage, size reduction and pelletisation after mixing with binder and/or additives as
required. The municipal solid waste collected for disposal is tested for its moisture
content and when the moisture content is more than 35- 40%, it requires drying to
produce fuel pellets with reasonable heating values. The reduction in moisture can be
done artificially or by natural sun drying. Sun drying is preferred when adequate land is
readily available. However, during periods of heavy rainfall, alternate arrangements for
drying will have to be made. The moisture level of waste is brought down to around
35-40% by uniformly spreading it on an open, paved area and allowing it to be dried by
the Sun. The duration of sun drying varies from 1 to 2 days depending upon the garbage
quality. In the process of spreading the garbage, manual inspection is carried out to
remove large debris, tree cuttings, tyres etc., which are harmful to the downstream
process equipment.
51 Ready Reckoner, “Municipal Solid Waste Management for Urban Local Bodies”, Commissionerate ofMunicipal Administration: Chennai, (November 2008), p. 34.
52 Subhash Anand, Solid Waste Management, 171 (Mittal Publications: New Delhi, 1st Edn., 2010).
137
The non-combustible items are removed, separating glass and metals for
recycling. The combustible waste is shredded into a smaller, more uniform particle size
for burning. The RDF thus produced may be burnt in boilers on-site, or it may be shipped
to off-site boilers for energy conversion. If the RDF is to be used offsite, it is usually
dense into pellets through the process of pelletisation. Pelletisation involves segregation
of the incoming waste into high and low calorific value materials and shredding them
separately, to nearly uniform size. The different heaps of the shredded waste are then
mixed together in suitable proportion and then solidified to produce RDF pellets.
Additional advantage is that the pellets can be conveniently stored and transported53.
Waste to Energy methods-Power generation through Incineration
It is the process of direct burning of wastes in the presence of excess air (oxygen)
at the temperature of about 8000°C and above, liberating heat energy, inert gases and ash.
Net energy yield depends upon the density and composition of the waste; relative percentage
of moisture and inert materials, which add to the heat loss; ignition temperature; size and
shape of the constituents; design of the combustion system (fixed bed/ fluidized bed), etc.
In practice, about 65 to 80 % of the energy content of the organic matter can be recovered
as heat energy, which can be utilized either for direct thermal applications, or for
producing power via steam turbine generators (with typical conversion efficiency of
about 30%). The combustion temperatures of conventional incinerators fuelled only by
wastes are about 760° C in the furnace and in excess of 870°C in the secondary
combustion chamber. These temperatures are needed to avoid odour from incomplete
combustion but are insufficient to burn or even melt glass. To avoid the deficiencies of
conventional incinerators, some modern incinerators utilize higher temperatures of up to
1650˚C using supplementary fuel. These reduce waste volume by 97% and convert metal
and glass to ash. While incineration is extensively used as an important method of waste
disposal, it is associated with some polluting discharges, which are of environmental
concern, although in varying degrees of severity. These can fortunately be effectively
53 Ready Reckoner, “Municipal Solid Waste Management for Urban Local Bodies”, Commissionerate ofMunicipal Administration: Chennai, (November 2008), p. 36.
138
controlled by installing suitable pollution control devices and by suitable furnace
construction and control of the combustion process54.
4.7.6. Disposal of Municipal Solid Wastes
Open dumping of waste can cause irreparable damage to the environment by
polluting land, water and air; adversely affecting human health; and lowering people’s
quality of life. The 2000 Municipal Solid Waste rules, therefore, prohibit open dumps and
require municipal authorities to safely dispose of solid waste in engineered landfills.
The rules further mandate treatment of the organic fraction of solid waste before final
disposal in the landfill sites. Thus, only rejected and degraded waste can be placed in
landfills. All cities and towns in India are, therefore, under an obligation to stop crude
dumping of waste at open dumping grounds and to instead identify suitable lands for the
construction of engineered landfills following the standard prescribed in Schedule III of
the rules. Schedule III provides guidelines for the basic landfill requirements for selection
and design. The following sections outline important guidelines55.
Specification for Landfill Sites and Guidelines
Site Selection
a) In areas falling under the jurisdiction of “development authorities,” it is the
responsibility of those authorities to identify the landfill sites and to hand over the
sites to the concerned municipal authority for development, operation and maintenance.
Elsewhere, this responsibility lies with the concerned municipal authority.
b) Selection of landfill sites must be based on examination of environmental issues.
The Department of Urban Development of the State or the Union territory must coordinate
with the concerned organizations to obtain the necessary approvals and clearances.
c) Landfill sites must be planned and designed with proper documentation of a phased
construction plan as well as a closure plan.
54 Ready Reckoner, “Municipal Solid Waste Management for Urban Local Bodies”, Commissionerate ofMunicipal Administration: Chennai, (November 2008), p. 37.
55 Da Zhu, P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, Improving MunicipalSolid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 40 (TheInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008).
139
d) Landfill sites must be selected to make use of a nearby waste processing facility.
Otherwise, a waste processing facility must be planned as an integral part of the
landfill site.
e) Existing landfill sites that will continue to be used for more than five years must be
improved in accordance with the specifications that are given in Schedule III.
f) Biomedical waste must be disposed of in accordance with the Bio-Medical Waste
(Management and Handling) Rules 1998 and hazardous waste must be managed in
accordance with the Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Transboundary
Movement) Rules 2008.
g) Landfill sites must be large enough to last for 20 to 25 years.
h) Landfill sites must be away from habitation clusters, forest areas, water bodies,
monuments, national parks and wetlands, as well as places of important cultural,
historical, or religious interest56.
i) A buffer zone of no development must be maintained around the landfill site and
must be incorporated in the town planning department’s land-use plans.
j) Landfill sites shall be away from airports, including airbases. Approval of airport or
airbase authorities must be obtained before setting up a landfill site if the site is to be
within 20 kilometres of an airport or airbase57.
In addition to those rules, the state pollution control boards are required to
prescribe the criteria for site selection in terms of distance to be maintained from
habitation, water bodies, highways, railways and so forth. Municipal authorities should
also adhere to those criteria.
Facilities at the Site
a) Landfill sites must be fenced or hedged and must be provided with a proper gate to
monitor incoming vehicles or other modes of transport.
56 Da Zhu, P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, Improving MunicipalSolid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 41 (TheInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008).
57 Schedule – III of the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules 2000, available at:http://www. moef.nic.in/legis/hsm/mswmhr.html, (visited on 12.09.2014).
140
b) Landfill sites must be well protected to prevent entry of unauthorized persons and
stray animals.
c) Approach and other internal roads for free movement of vehicles and other machinery
must exist at the landfill site.
d) Landfill sites must have a waste inspection facility to monitor waste brought to the
landfill, an office facility for recordkeeping and a shelter for equipment and
machinery, including pollution-monitoring equipment.
e) A weigh bridge to measure the quantity of waste brought to the landfill, fire
protection equipment and other facilities should be provided as required.
f) Utilities such as drinking water and lighting arrangements for easy landfill operations
when carried out in night hours must be provided. If possible, bathing facilities for
workers should be provided.
g) Safety provisions, such as health inspection for landfill workers, must be periodically
made58.
Specifications for Land filling
The rules lay down detailed specifications for land filling, which should be
strictly adhered to. Waste subjected to land filling is expected to be compacted in thin
layers and covered immediately or at the end of each workday with at least 10 centimetres of
soil. After completion of landfill, a final cover must be designed to minimize infiltration
and erosion. The final cover must have a barrier soil layer followed by a drainage layer.
On top of the drainage layer, a vegetative layer is needed to support natural plant growth
and to minimize erosion. Moreover, directions have been given for pollution prevention
and water-quality monitoring, landfill closure and later care. The municipal authorities
should follow the rules carefully when constructing an engineered landfill59.
58 Schedule – III of the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules 2000, available at:http://www. moef.nic.in/legis/hsm/mswmhr.html, (visited on 12.09.2014).
59 Da Zhu, P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, Improving MunicipalSolid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 41-42 (TheInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008).
141
4.8. Role of Rag Pickers in the Solid Waste Management
Rag pickers constitute a segment of the people involved in the waste trade make a
living by collecting and selling recyclable materials out of municipal Solid Waste.
Rag pickers are known by different names like “waste pickers, garbage combers,
scavengers etc”. In Delhi they also called as khattewala. On the basis of work place, they
can be categorized into “waste pickers at market, waste pickers at street, waste pickers at
dustbins and waste pickers at landsite”60.
Preliminarily there are three different kinds of waste pickers:
1. Those who carry a sack on their back and collect whatever has any resale value.
These waste pickers of street move in their respective localities and pick up waste
from streets, drains, waste bins, open waste collection points and land fill sites etc.
2. Those who use a tricycle and collect over 50 grams of waste per day.
3. Those who work for the waste dealers. These waste pickers are committed to sell
their daily collection to the waste dealers who employ them.
Rag pickers are quite often seen around the waste collection centers and dumping
sites, engaged in picking up recyclable items. The items which have been thrown by
generators, becomes the source of livelihood for waste pickers. In the absence of source
segregation, the waste pickers collect the recyclables from the garbage bins. They pick up
about 10-20% of waste generated. The most common waste item collected by them is
plastic. The quantity and kind of material collected depends upon the type of area in
which collection is done such as residential, commercial and industrial etc. On an average
an adult waste picker collect between 5-15 Kilograms of plastic and 10-15 kilograms of
paper and cardboard61.
Their activities reduce the transportation cost and land fill requirement. A survey
conducted by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) during 1996 in some of the cities
has revealed that rag pickers play a key role in the management of municipal solid waste.
60 Subhash Anand, Solid Waste Management, 231 (Mittal Publications: New Delhi, 1st Edn., 2010).61 Martin J. Brunch et al. (eds), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Environment and
Health, 451-464 (Department of Geography, University of Madras and Faculty of EnvironmentStudies, New York: Chennai 15-17 December 2003).
142
They work day and night on the garbage dump sites to collect the recyclable materials.
Some of the findings of the CPCB on rag pickers are following:
1. Rag pickers were quite often seen around waste receptacles engaged in picking up
waste materials of their use.
2. An excellent example of segregation of waste on dust bins is provided by rag pickers,
who make the living out of discarded materials.
3. Rag pickers amongst themselves have good understanding for area wise operation in
the city.
4. Rag picking by children is a matter of serious concern.
5. Each group of rag pickers takes specific item for segregation task.
6. After segregation of waste, rag pickers sell it to waste dealers62.
Waste picking has a negative influence on the health of waste pickers. They are
exposed to infections and come on contact with hazardous wastes and bacterially infected
wastes. Possible health hazards include hand and leg injuries, intestinal and respiratory
infections, lower back pain and skin disorder etc.
4.9 Judicial Activism on Municipal Solid Waste Management
In India, solid waste management is the primary responsibility and duty of the
municipal authorities. State legislations and the local Acts that govern municipal
authorities include special provisions for collection, transport and disposal of waste. Most
of the State legislation does not cover the necessary technical or organizational details of
solid waste management.
In the absence of appropriate legislation or of any monitoring mechanism on the
performance of municipal authorities, the system of waste management has remained
severally deficient and outdated. At the disposal sites, municipal authorities dump
municipal wastes, human excreta from slum settlements, industrial waste from small
62 “National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies”, Official News Letter: NewDelhi, Vol. 6, No. 1 (April 2004).
143
industrial establishments within the city and bio-medical waste without imposing any
restrictions, provoking serious problems of health and environmental degradation63.
In Rampal and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors64 the petitioners are residents of
Mundara Mohalla, situated in the town of Mandal in Bhilwara District, there is a blind
lane and a common chowk in the centre, which is surrounded by the houses of the
petitioners and others. The petitioner’s grievance is that water of domestic use, including
dirty water from the houses of the Mohalla, as also rain water has collected in the chowk
and because there is no drain for the discharge of the accumulated water, there is growth
of moss and insects and there is possibility of spread of epidemics.
The petitioners have relied upon a letter written in this connection by the medical
and health officer, government hospital, Bhilwara, on June 18, 1979, to the executive
officer of the Municipal Board. Mandal inviting his attention to the fact that stagnant
water, which has collected in the common chowk of the Mimdara Mohalla, has become
the breeding place of mosquitoes and insects and may cause spread of diseases.
The medical and health officer in his aforesaid letter expressed the view that immediate steps
should be taken for making a permanent arrangement for the disposal of such water as has
collected in the chowk and which has caused a nuisance, for the residents of the area.
As the Municipal Board has not cared to take any action in the matter, the
petitioners have filed a writ of mandamus praying for a direction to the Municipal Board
for removal and discharge of filthy and dirty water and the construction of proper
drainage or sewers for the discharge of such water. Section 98 of the Rajasthan
Municipalities Act 1959 deals with the primary and secondary functions of the Municipal
Boards. Amongst the primary duties enumerated in Section 98 of the Act, it has been
provided that the Municipal Board should make reasonable provisions for cleaning public
streets, places and sewers and all spaces not being private property and removing noxious
vegetation and removing of public nuisances; removing filth, rubbish or other noxious
and offensive matter and constructing drains, sewers, drainage works etc. under sections
63 Da Zhu, P. U. Asnani, Chris Zurbrügg, Sebastian Anapolsky and Shyamala Mani, Improving MunicipalSolid Waste Management in India- A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, 11 (TheInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank: Washington DC, 2008).
64 AIR 1981 Raj 121.
144
174 to 187, extensive powers have been given to the Municipal Boards for the purpose of
maintaining cleanliness within the municipal area by repairing the existing drains,
directing the construction of new drains and controlling the drainage system.
The Municipal Boards are thus primarily responsible for maintaining sanitation and for
taking proper steps for creating and maintaining healthy conditions within the municipal
area. The Municipal Board Mandal contended that it is not the duty of the Municipal
Board to remove or discharge the accumulated water and construct proper drainage
system for the discharge of water accumulated in the chowk in Mundara Mohalla. Hence
the Court directed the Municipal Board, Mandal to remove the water and fifth collected
in the chowk in Mundara Mohalla, Mandal by the construction of proper sewers and
drains, so as to remove the cause of possible nuisance in the locality, within a period of
three months.
In Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Vardhichand and Ors65 the residents of a locality
within the limits of Ratlam Municipality, tormented by stench and stink by open drains
and public excretions by nearby slum dwellers moved the sub-divisional magistrate under
Sec. 133 Cr.P.C to require the municipality to construct the drain pipe with the flow of
water to wash the filth and stop the stench towards the members of the public.
The municipality pleaded lack of funds as the chief cause of disability to carry out its duties.
The magistrate gave directions to the municipality to draft a plan within six
months for removing the nuisance. The High Court approved the order of the magistrate,
to which the municipality further appealed to the Supreme Court. The issue was whether
a court can compel a statutory body to carry out its duties to the community by
constructing sanitation facilities.
The Supreme Court through Justice Krishna Iyer upheld the order of High Court
and directed the municipality to take immediate action within its statutory powers to
construct sufficient number of public latrines, provide water supply and scavenging
services, to construct drains, cesspools and to provide basic amenities to the public.
The Court also accepted the use of Sec.133 Cr.P.C for removal of public nuisance.
A responsible municipal council constituted for the precise purpose of preserving public
65 AIR 1980 SC 1622.
145
health and providing better facility cannot run away from its principal duty by pleading
financial inability.
In L.K. Koolwal v. State of Rajasthan and Ors66 Mr. L. K. Koolwal has moved to
High Court in the matter of sanitation in Jaipur City. Numbers of affidavits have been
filed by the citizens of Jaipur relating to each of the locality referred to in the case to
show that the sanitation problem is acute in Jaipur which is hazardous to the life of the
citizens of Jaipur. Insanitation leads to a slow poisoning and adversely affects the life of
the citizen and invites the death at an earlier date than the natural death.
In this case the court held that it is the primary duty of the municipal council to
remove filth, rubbish, night-soil, odour or any other noxious or offensive matter.
The primary duties will have to be performed by the Municipal Board and there cannot
be any plea whether the funds are available or not; whether the staff is available or not.
It is for the municipality to see how to perform the primary duties and how to raise
resources for the performance of that duty. In the performance of primary duty no excuse
can be taken and can be directed also as it is primary, mandatory and obligatory duty to
perform the same.
In M.C. Mehta v. State of Orissa67 a writ of mandamus was filed to protect the
health of thousands of innocent people living in Cuttack and adjacent areas who were
suffering from pollution from sewage being caused by the municipal committee Cuttack
and the SCB Medical College Hospital, Cuttack. The main contention of the petitioner is
that the dumping of untreated waste water of the hospital and some other parts of the city
in the Taladanda Canal was creating health problems in the city. The State, on the other
hand contended that the central sewerage system had been installed in the hospital and
that there is no sewage flow into the Taladanda Canal as alleged. Further, it was asserted
that the State had not received any information relating to either pollution or of epidemic
of water borne diseases caused by contamination of the canal.
The Court reprimanded the authorities and directed the government to
immediately act on the matter. The court also recommended setting up of a committee to
66 AIR 1988 Raj 2.67 AIR 1992 Ori 225.
146
take steps to prevent and control water pollution and to maintain wholesomeness of water
meant for human consumption amongst other things. A responsible municipal council
constituted for the precise purpose of preserving public health. Provision of proper
drainage system in working conditions cannot be avoided by pleading financial inability.
In B. L. Wadera v. Union of India ( popularly known as Delhi Garbage Case) 68,
the Supreme Court of India given a judgment touched garbage affairs of Delhi and issued
several directions to the local municipal authorities to perform up to satisfaction of
public, which all their statutory obligations. In Delhi Garbage Case, B. L. Wadera sought
directions to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and the New Delhi Municipal
Council (NDMC) to perform their statutory duties in particular the collection, removal
and disposal of garbage and other waste. The court observed that river Yamuna – the
main source of drinking water supply is the free dumping place for untreated sewage and
industrial waste. The rapid industrial development, urbanization and regular flow of
persons from rural to urban areas have made major contribution towards environmental
degradation but at the same time the authorities entrusted with the work of pollution
control cannot be permitted to sit back with folded hands on the pretext that they have no
financial or other means to control pollution and protect the environment. In its earlier
order dated December 16, 1994 the court had directed the MCD and Delhi Development
Authority (DDA) to place on record the list of all garbage dumping places and city
garbage collection centres. They were also asked to state what steps were being taken by
them to keep those places clean and tidy. The court further pointed that the collection and
disposal of garbage in the city of Delhi was causing serious problems. It was not for the
court to keep on monitoring such problems. The officers who were manning institutions
like MCD and NDMC must realize their responsibilities and show the end result.
After examining the relevant provisions of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act,
1957 (the Delhi Act) and the New Delhi Municipal Council Act 1994 (the New Delhi Act),
the court opined that the NCD and the NDMC were under a statutory obligation to
scavenge and clean the city of Delhi and that they had been wholly remiss in the
performance of their statutory duties. Non availability of funds, inadequacy or
68 (1996) 2 SCC 594.
147
inefficiency of the staff, insufficiency of machinery, etc., cannot be pleaded as a ground
for non-performance of their statutory obligations. In the light of the fact of the case,
court issued the following directions:
1. The experimental schemes placed by MCD and NDMC to distribute polythene bags
and door to door collection of garbage and its disposal were approved by the court.
2. Directions were issued to construct and install incinerators in all the government
administered hospitals/nursing homes, with 50 beds and above, preferably within nine
months.
3. The All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi was directed separately to
install sufficient number of incinerators, or an equally effective alternate, to dispose
of the hospital waste.
4. The MCD and NDMC were asked to issue notices to all the private hospitals/nursing
homes in Delhi to make their own arrangements for the disposal of their garbage and
hospital waste.
5. The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the Delhi Pollution Control
Committee (DPCC) were assigned the job to inspect the different areas of Delhi to
ascertain that the collection, transportation and disposal of garbage/waste is carried
out satisfactorily.
6. The Government of the National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi was directed to
appoint Municipal Magistrates for the trial of offences under the DMC Act and the
NDMC Act.
7. Doordarshan was asked to undertake a programme of educating the residents of Delhi
regarding their civic duties under the DMC Act and the NDMC Act.
8. The Ministry of Defence Production and Government of India was directed to have
the already ordered Tippers supplied to the MCD as expeditiously as possible and
preferably within three months.
9. The Development Commissioner and Government of NCT Delhi was directed to
handover two sites, near Badarpur on Jaitpur Pits and Mandi village near Jaunpur
Quiry Pits, to be used as Secured Land Filling (SLF) sites within three months.
148
10. Direction was issued to review and put into operation the compost plant at Okhla.
MCD was also asked to examine the construction of four additional compost plants as
recommended by Jag Mohan Committee.
11. The MCD was instructed not to use the filled up SLF’s for any other purpose except
forestry. MCD was directed to develop forests and gardens on all 12 such sites.
12. The MCD and NDMC were directed to construct or install additional garbage
collection centres in the form of dhalaos, trolley and steel bins within four months.
13. The directions were issued to the Union of India and NCT, Delhi Administration to
consider the request from MCD and NDMC for financial assistance, in a just and fair
manner.
14. As disposal of garbage and solid-waste by 'SLF' method may not be possible after
some time due to non-availability of sites, the NCT Delhi Administration and also the
MCD and NDMC were directed by the court to join hands and engage an expert body
like NEERI to find out alternate methods of garbage and solid waste disposal.
The question of solid waste disposal once again came before the court in Almitra
H. Patel v. Union of India69 and the court in its order constituted a committee to look in
to all aspects of urban solid waste management and in particular to the following areas:
1. Examine the existing practices and to suggest hygienic processing and waste disposal
practices and proven technologies on the basis of economic feasibility and safety
which the corporations or government may directly or indirectly adopt or sponsor.
2. Examine and suggest ways to improve conditions in the formal and informal sector
for promoting eco-friendly, sorting, collection, transportation, disposal, recycling and
reuse.
3. To review municipal bye-laws and the power of local bodies and regional planning
authorities and suggest necessary modifications to ensure effective budgeting,
financing, administration, monitoring and compliance.
69 (2000) 2 SCC 679.
149
4. Examine and formulate standards and regulations for management of urban solid
waste and set time-frame within which the authorities shall be bound to implement
the same.
The committee submitted its report before the court. During the proceedings of
the case the court came to know that the fourteen directions issued by it in B. L. Wadhera’s
Case have not been complied till date. The court opined that keeping Delhi clean was not
an easy task but it was not an impossible one, what required were initiative, dedication
and professional pride. The court pointed that domestic garbage and sewage were large
contributor of solid waste and the problem became more complex because of a large
number of inhabitants living in unauthorized colonies and slums, having no proper means
of dealing with the domestic effluents.
The effect of failure of the direction issued in Delhi Garbage Case was clearly
reflected in the judgment when the court accepted its limitations and observed: “we
believe it is not for this court to direct as to how the municipal authorities should carry
out their functions and resolve difficulties in regard to the management of solid waste.
The court, in fact, is ill-equipped to do so. Without doubt the government agencies
including the local authorities have all the powers of the State to take action and ensure
that the city remains clean. They have only to wake up and act. The court should, however,
direct that the local authorities, government and all statutory authorities must discharge their
statutory duties and obligations in keeping the city at least reasonably clean”.
The court passed further directions which were in addition to and not in
derogation of the orders passed by it in Delhi Garbage Case:
1. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi, the Cantonment Board and all concerned
officials were directed to ensure that the relevant provision of the DMC Act, 1957,
New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 and the Cantonments Act, 1924 relating to
sanitation and public health prohibiting accumulation of any rubbish, filth, garbage or
other polluted obnoxious matters in any premises or prohibiting any person from
depositing the same in any street or public place shall be scrupulously complied.
2. The streets, public premises such as parks etc. shall be surface cleaned on daily basis,
including on Sundays and public holidays.
150
3. The MCD, NDMC and other statutory authorities were authorize to levy and recover
charges and costs from any person littering or violating provisions of the Acts, bye-
laws and regulations relating to sanitation and health, for violating the directions
being issued by the court.
4. The MCD and NDMC and other statutory authorities were directed to ensure proper
and scientific disposal of waste in a manner so as to sub serve the common good.
5. The court directed that sites for landfills be identified bearing in mind the
environmental considerations and the requirements of Delhi for the next twenty years
within a period of four weeks. The sites so identified shall be handed over to the
MCD or NDMC within two weeks of the identification, free from all encumbrances
and without MCD or the NDMC having to make any payment in respect thereof.
6. Union of India, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, MCD, NDMC
and other statutory authorities like DDA and Railways were directed to take appropriate
steps for preventing any fresh encroachment or unauthorized occupation of public
land for the purpose of dwelling resulting in creation of a slum. Further direction was
given to take appropriate steps to improve the sanitation in the existing slums.
7. The court further directed to identify and make available to the MCD and NDMC
within four weeks eight sites for setting up compost plants. Such sites shall be handed
over to the MCD/NDMC free of cost and free from all encumbrances within two
weeks of identification. MCD and NDMC were asked to take appropriate steps
thereafter to have the compost plants established or caused to be established and to be
in operation by 30th September, 2000.
8. Direction was issued by the court to regularly publish the names of concerned
Superintendents of Sanitation and such equivalent officers who are responsible for
cleaning Delhi, who can be approached for any complaint by the citizens of Delhi
together with their latest office and residential telephone numbers and addresses.
9. The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi was directed to appoint
Magistrates within a period of six week for each board/Circle/Ward for ensuring
151
compliance of the provisions of the MCD and NDMC Acts and to try the offences
specified, in relation to littering and causing nuisance, sanitation and public health.
10. The court asked all the concerned authorities to file compliance reports of these
directions within eight weeks. The Central Pollution Control Board was also directed
to file within the same time an affidavit indicating as to what extent the directions
issued have been complied with.
In Suo Motu v. Ahmedabad Municipal Corpn.70 at Ahmedabad due to rapid and
enormous growth of the city and the areas on its periphery are facing with many
problems, but the serious and alarming problems are pertaining to public health, hygiene
and sanitation. The civic bodies including the Ahmedabad municipal corporation are found
hopelessly lacking in solving these problems due to various reasons. Their weaknesses and
shortcoming get completely exposed during the monsoon and the aftermath of the
monsoon. Within first week of the monsoon, the roads start getting flooded with water,
the storm-water drainages start overflowing, the open plots get water logged, the
un-disposed garbage heaps found on the road side start stinking. In all areas within the
city and also outside it and also in the areas near railway tracks which are under the
jurisdiction of the western railway un-disposed garbage get soaked in the water causing
grave problem to the public health.
The legal provisions which relate to the public health and hygiene and the duties
cast upon the civic officials to safeguard and take adequate care of them are stated in,
The Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963, the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations
Act, 1949 and the Panchayats Act, 1993. Further, the Court appointed a committee for
submitting detailed report of the hygienic situation in the Ahmedabad city. Based upon
the above said legislations and the report of the committee, the Court found that though
the civic authorities have been entrusted with certain important duties and they are
adequately equipped with the power and the means for the efficient discharge of these
duties, they have miserably failed, mainly on account of lethargy and lack of effort on the
part of the work force. It also reveals that for one reason or the other person in-charge of
70 (2006) 2 GLR 1129.
152
administration of these civic authorities have totally ignored such attitude of the
subordinates. Hence, the Court issued the following directions to the civic bodies:
i. Regular scavenging, collection of garbage to be done and maintained clean and
garbage free environment.
ii. Install litter boxes/containers at different points in adequate number.
iii. Prompt and efficient drainage to be maintained to prevent accumulation of water
during monsoon and to discharge domestic effluent.
iv. The civic bodies shall construct proper drainage net-work and to regularly carry
out its cleansing and de-silting operation, especially immediately prior to
commencement of the monsoon season to avoid its choking and the resultant
accumulation of water.
v. To provide public latrines, urinals and similar conveniences with modern facility
and to maintain them clean and in proper conditions.
vi. To evolve a proper cell for regularly scavenging the streets, removal and disposal
of garbage and solid waste and other obnoxious and polluted matters.
vii. To erect adequate number of garbage collection centres and to have adequate
number of pick up vans with adequate number of garbage collectors.
viii. To see that the solid waste and garbage are not thrown or littered outside the
collection centres.
The authorities also should educate the people well in time even by door-to-door
campaign during pre-monsoon period and also during the monsoon to prevent any
indifferent attitude of the people towards maintenance of cleanliness and unnecessary
water accumulation on private properties, which could provide ideal breeding places for
the mosquitoes generating diseases like dengue, malaria, etc. They should also give
adequate publicity on every means of media. The public authorities have to carry out all
these duties which have been prescribed in the Act, the Rules and the Bye-laws with all
earnestness and sincerity and in right spirit. They cannot avoid discharge of such duties
on the pretext that there are no adequate means available with them.
153
In Shelter Trust v. Union of India71 the petitioner prays for a Writ of Mandamus
directing the Kodaikanal municipality to stop the dumping of garbage in the
Seeradumkanal Village in Kodaikanal Taluk. According to the petitioner, the
Commissioner of the Kodaikanal municipality has been dumping mixed untreated
garbage consisting of wet market waste, house work glass, tins, plastics, papers and
carcasses etc., at a site in Seeradumkanal Village directly above the drinking water source
for Perumalmalai and Palani Town and the said site is also very close to the Tiger Shola
Reserve Forest.
He also contended that the presence of untreated mixed garbage including plastics
endanger the flora and fauna to the nearby forest areas and on account of plastics get
scattered all over the forest area, a number of wild and endangered animals have died in
the forest due to consumption of such plastics and on account of the dumping of
untreated wet garbage, lot of grey and silver biting flies get attracted to the site and these
flies then feed on wild animals causing their death. Therefore, according to the petitioner,
in public interest, safety and health, Commissioner of the Kodaikanal municipality has to
be stopped from dumping the garbage in Seeradumkanal Village in Kodaikanal.
The petitioner further contended that the site in question is unsuitable for disposal
of garbage and is a threat to the environment, if the Commissioner is permitted to dispose
of the garbage in the present location. According to him, there is clear violation of the
Municipal Solid Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 2000 in all aspects.
On the other hand the Commissioner contended that the proposed site is
16 kilometres away from Kodaikanal town and 6 kilometres away from the old compost
yard and after reclamation and forming of roads, bridges, etc., the garbage of Kodaikanal
Municipality collected from Kodaikanal town are being dumped in the site. The mixed
garbage with plastic, glass, tins, etc., are being segregated first at the collection point itself
and carried to the dumping yard in lorries in separate compartments. It is the further
contention of the Commissioner that there is a ban for using plastics in Kodaikanal town with
effect from 16.06.2000 and anybody using plastics will be fined in accordance with the
Resolution No.2219 dated 04.06.2000 as approved by the municipal council of Kodaikanal.
71 Available at: http://indiankanoon.org/doc/165032/, (visited on 05.04.2014).
154
The Commissioner submitted that the site in question was selected by following
the due procedure and in fact, to the public notice issued by the District Collector calling
for objections against the assignment of site to him for the purpose of locating the
garbage disposal yard, there was no objection from the public and all the entire
expenditure was incurred by the municipality only with a view to dispose of the garbage
without causing any sort of problem to the general public. Moreover the Commissioner
stated that the necessary clearance was granted by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control
Board.
The Court found from the report filed by the Commissioner as well as the
Pollution Control Board, that the municipality is in the process of implementing the
various measures as suggested by the Pollution Control Board and the municipality itself
appears to have fixed an outer time limit for completion of various measures and
earmarked funds for the same. The success or failure of the scheme initiated by the
municipality could be decided only after the completion of the measures taken in
compliance with the direction of the Pollution Control Board and as such, it is too
premature to comment on the possible effect on the environment in case the garbage is
disposed in the present premises. Hence the Court dismissed the Writ petition.
In Sat Priya Mehamia Memorial Education Trust (Regd.) v. State of Haryana and
others72the facts of the case were, an area measuring 20 Bighas 19 Biswas was acquired
on the Jind Rohtak Road as early as in the year 1975 for dumping of municipal waste
from the municipal limits of Rohtak. The said site has ever since then been used as a
dumping site of municipal solid waste. The site which was at the time of its acquisition
outside the municipal limits of Rohtak was brought within the said limits in the year
1990. Nearly 20 years after the acquisition of the dumping site, the petitioner trust
purchased a large area measuring 25 acres at a short distance away from the dumping site
for construction of a school. The school came up in due course to which nearly 1000
students are said to have been admitted over the years. The dumping of municipal solid
waste at the site mentioned above is causing air pollution and is contrary to the Municipal
Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000 framed under the Environment
72 Available at: http://indiankanoon.org/doc/838088/, (visited on 05.04.2014).
155
(Protection) Act, 1986. Since the dumping site is merely 200 meters away from the
school, the petitioner trust has filed the writ of prohibition restraining municipal council,
Rohtak from dumping the municipal solid waste at the said site. A mandamus directing
the municipal council to take immediate steps in the matter including steps by way of
shifting the municipal solid waste to a far flung, remote and uninhabited place, has also
been prayed for.
The petitioner contended that no facility for disposal of municipal solid waste
could be set up without the prior approval of the authorities in terms of Rule 6(2) of the
Municipal Solid Wastes (Management & Handling) Rules, 2000. It was contended that
although the disposal of the solid waste by landfill method was pre-existing as on the date
of promulgation of the said Rules, the same did not permit making of any improvement in
the method already in use by way of setting up of solid waste treatment plant.
On the other hand the respondents contended that the landfill method was one of
the modes of disposal of solid waste and the said facility having been set up 25 years
before the framing of the Rules could not be shut down just because someone had with
his eyes open purchased land in the vicinity of the facility and was finding the same to be
a source of nuisance to him or to his establishment. It was urged that paragraph No.5 of
Schedule III of the Rules, 2000, permitted improvement of an existing facility to bring
the same in accord with the specifications given in the said Schedule. Setting up of a
Solid Waste Treatment Plant at considerable expense of Rs. 19 Crores was nothing but an
improvement of the existing facility which was clearly permissible and against which the
petitioners could make no grievance.
The Court observed that Rule 6 of the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management &
Handling) Rules, 2000 fixes the responsibility of the Central and State Pollution Control
Boards and the Committees to monitor compliance with the standards regarding ground
water, ambient air etc., as specified in Schedules (II) (III) and (IV) of the said Rules.
It also provides for making of applications by the municipal authorities or the operator of
a facility for grant of authorization for setting up waste processing and disposal facility
including landfills, which applications have than to be examined after taking into
consideration the views of other agencies like the State Urban Development Department,
156
the Town and Council Planning Department, Air Port or Air Base Authority, or the
Ground Water Board as the case may be. A conjoint reading of Rule 6 and Para No.5 of
Schedule III results, that for continued use of landfill sites, it is unnecessary for the
municipal authorities to apply to the Board or the Committee nor is it necessary for the
Board or the Committee to take views of other authorities or agencies mentioned in Rule
6 (2) of Rules, 2000. The landfill sites existing as on the date of framing of the Rules
have only to be improved in accordance with the specifications given in the Schedules.
There is consequently no prohibition for use of an existing landfill site by the municipal
authorities. Hence, the court dismissed the writ petition with costs.
In S. Nandakumar v. The Secretary to Government73 The petitioner is the
President of Kuthambakkam Panchayat, which is stated to be a model village and
nominated for the UN Habitat award and the recipient of commendation from the United
Nations. The Panchayat by name Kuthambakkam Panchayat, situated at Poonamallee
Taluk, Thiruvallur District consists of seven hamlets and agriculture is the main source of
livelihood for the villagers. There are about 1,195 families and more than 55% of them
are Dalits and landless labourers. Nearly 1000 cattle of the villagers are dependent on 100
acres of common grazing land in the village. These livestock also provide a substantial
source of livelihood for the villagers at Kuthambakkam. For many of these families the
cattle they possess is a major source of livelihood and being landless, they are entirely
dependent on the common grazing lands. In the absence of these grazing lands, cattle
cannot survive and the villagers would be left with no other economic sustenance.
The revenue records of Kuthambakkam Village shows that an extent of 99.61 acres of
land in Survey No.820/1C had been classified as grazing ground and the said land is vested
with the petitioner Panchayat as provided under Sections 132 and 134 of the Tamil Nadu
Panchayats Act. The said land which is the communal property of the villagers of
Kuthambakkam village is being administered by the petitioner for common benefit.
The village is situated less than 50 metres from Chembarabakkam Lake, which is a fresh
water lake and is one of the main sources for supply of drinking water to Chennai City
and its suburban areas. The entire Kuthambakkam and neighbouring area which consists
of vast tracts of agricultural land, is the main catchment area for the Chembarambakkam
73 Available at: http://indiankanoon.org/doc/788976/, (visited on 05.04.2014).
157
Lake. While the matters stood thus, the Municipalities of Ambattur, Maduravayal,
Tiruverkadu, Valasaravakkam, Poonamallee and Porur Town Panchayat appears to have
approached the Government with a proposal for establishing a Municipal Solid Waste
Generation Station. The local bodies were in need of adequate lands for establishing
common Integrated Solid Waste Management and sanitary land fill facility. The Collector
of Thiruvallur District identified the grazing land in Kuthambakkam village as the
suitable site for setting up the proposed project and it was intended for all these local
bodies. However before taking a decision by the Collector and the Government, no notice
was issued to the Village Panchayat. There is a prescribed procedure as contained under
Section 134 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act and Rules 3 and 4 of the Tamil Nadu
Panchayats (Restriction and Control to Regulate the use of Porombokes in Ryotwari
Tracts) Rules, 2000, in the matter of taking over the land for any other specific purpose.
However, the said procedure was not followed by the District Collector. In fact, when the
petitioner and the other villagers came to know of the proposal through other sources,
they have promptly approached the authorities. The Panchayat also passed a resolution
against the proposal. In the meantime, the petitioner came to know that the Government
has passed an order as per G.O.Ms.No.78 dated 23 February, 2009 conveying the land in
favour of the local bodies.
On the other hand the learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of the
Government justified the action taken in public interest. According to him, before issuing
the order in G.O.Ms.No.78 dated 23 February, 2009, the objections submitted by the
village panchayat as well as the villagers were considered and a reference to that effect is
contained even in the impugned Government Order. According to the learned Advocate
General, everything depends upon the clearance to be given by the Environmental
Assessment Authority and the no objection certificate issued by the Pollution Control
Board is only tentative in nature. The learned Advocate General made a statement before
us that in case the Environmental Assessment Authority comes to a conclusion that the
subject site is not fit for establishing the Solid Waste Management Plant, the land would
be returned to the Kuthambakkam Panchayat.
158
Based on the contentions the Court issued the following directions:
i. The concerned panchayat and the municipalities are directed to approach the
Environmental Impact Assessment Authority with full particulars of the proposed
common Solid Waste Management Plant.
ii. The Environmental Impact Assessment Authority is directed to give a copy of the
application submitted by the municipalities and panchayat for granting prior
environmental clearance in the matter of establishing the solid waste management
Plant to the panchayat so as to enable the petitioner to submit their views or
objections in the matter.
iii. The Kuthambakkam Panchayat and the local affected persons should be given an
opportunity to offer their comments during the public hearing.
iv. The environmental and ecological aspect of the project should be evaluated by the
statutory authority before granting clearance.
v. In case the Environmental Impact Assessment Authority rejects the application for
prior environmental clearance, liberty is given to the Kuthambakkam Panchayat to
approach the Government for cancellation of the allotment to respondents 7 to 12, in
view of the statement made by the learned Advocate General.
In Gram Panchayat Totu (Majthai) & ors v. State of Himachal Pradesh & ors74 in
the year 1999, a Solid Bio-Waste Management Plant (hereinafter called as MSW, Plant)
was installed by Shimla Municipality (hereinafter called M.C. Shimla) at a place
commonly known as Darni-Ka-Bagicha, Lalpass, Shimla. By afflux of time, the
Township of Shimla grew all around the place consequently the MSW Plant became
virtually situated in the middle of the town. The plant, unfortunately did not work
satisfactorily, as a result of which, stench and foul smell emanated from the site and
Polluted the surroundings, consequently the residents of the area were affected adversely
due to the foul smell. The municipality, it appears had entrusted the management of the
plant to a private company which did not possess the necessary technical know how to
74 National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, dated 11.10.2011 (visited on 06.04.2014),available at: http://www.greentribunal.gov.in/judgment/2-2011(RA)_11Oct_final_order.pdf.
159
run the plant, consequently the entire area was polluted and it caused nuisance to general
public at large.
In the year 2003, a Committee was constituted to shift the site of Solid Bio Waste
Management Plant from Darni-Ka-Bagicha to some other suitable place. The commissioner
of M.C., Shimla and other officers visited several places around Shimla and selected two
sites suitable for locating the MSW plant. After much deliberations, the Committee
selected the site near village Bharyal situated at Tara Devi - Totu Bye Pass for the said
purpose, and a proceeding was drawn up on 2nd September, 2003. In consonance of the
said decision, necessary steps were taken for obtaining allotment of lands and
permissions from different authorities concerned, as per the Municipal Solid Waste
(Management and Handling) Rules, 2000.
While matters stood thus, in the year 2009 unfortunately the MSW Plant which
was situated at Darni-Ka-Bagicha caught fire and the M.C. Shimla could not control the
same. The fire continued for more than 72 hours and created an alarming situation all
around. The obnoxious smell and smoke emanating from the dump site engulfed not only
the surrounding areas but also the entire town, posing immense health risks, like
respiratory ailments amongst the residents of the locality. It appears that the fumes and
smoke arising from the fire threatened the residential houses situated in the surrounding
areas and entered into the High Court premises, thereby causing disruptions in the day to
day work. The incident was reported in a number of newspapers including The Indian
Express and Dainik Bhaskar. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh on the basis
of newspaper reporting took suo-moto cognizance and registered CW PIL No.56 of 2009
and issued notices to M.C. Shimla, State Government and others.
After hearing the parties and taking note of the situation, the Hon’ble High Court
by order dated 22nd December, 2009, constituted a one man High Power Committee
consisting of the Principal Secretary (Power), Government of HP and directed to submit a
report. On 23rd December, 2009, the High Court observed as follows “We are conscious
of the fact that the present place of dumping of garbage is not suitable. It is on the by-
pass road and it has already played havoc with the environment and ecology of the area.
Consequently, we direct the Forest Department through Additional Chief Secretary
160
(Forest), Divisional Commissioner, Shimla and District Magistrate, Shimla to provide
landfill site near the site where the new Bio-conversion plant has to be set up within a
period of four weeks from today positively. This peremptory direction has been issued to
protect the health of the entire town, which has been put to peril by the inept handing of
the garbage by the functionaries of the Municipal Corporation, Shimla. The functionaries
of the Himachal Pradesh Pollution Control Board shall render all assistance to the
municipal corporation, Shimla in getting the new site by allowing all the permissions
expeditiously. It shall be open to the municipal corporation, Shimla to dump garbage as
per the provisions of the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules,
2000 at the new landfill site after a period of one week of the handing over of the site by
the district authorities. It is made clear that no person shall cause any hindrance in
selecting and handing over the site of landfill and dumping of the garbage at the new site.
Any hindrance / impediment / obstruction caused to the works of the municipal
corporation, Shimla while dumping the garbage at the new landfill site shall amount to
contempt of the Court and the persons shall be dealt with sternly”.
The applicant made a submission before the NGT that there is fragrant violation
of the citing criteria prescribed in Schedule-III more particularly under Clause 8 and 10
of the said schedule. According to Respondents way back in the year 2003, it was felt that
the area i.e Darni-Ka–Bagichal, Lalpani, Shimla, where the solid waste management
plant was situated had become thickly populated, several residential colonies having been
set up in the vicinity by afflux of time. The M.C. Shimla, therefore, proposed to shift the
plant to a distance place. The committee set up for the purpose after visiting several sites
finally selected the village Bharyal as a suitable place and accordingly steps were taken
for allotment of Government land. Necessary applications were filed before competent
authorities for allotment of land and granting permission to convert the said land for non-
forestry purpose. After considering the suggestions, the Ministry of Environment and
Forests, Government of India granted necessary permission to divert the forest land for
the purpose of setting up of the Solid Waste Management Plant at the site in question.
The M.C. Shimla had also obtained NOC from the Himachal Pradesh State Pollution
Control Board (HPSPCB) as well as Airport Authority of India for the Bio-composting
161
plant only. However, necessary authorization for landfill site has not yet been given by
HPSPCB or others.
Therefore, the NGT disposed this original application upholding the decision to
set up the MSW Plant and Landfill site at Village Bharyal In Tara-Devi Totu Bye Pass
and direct the Project Proponent, municipal corporation Shimla to set up the said plant
only after following the mandatory requirement stipulated in Municipal Solid Waste
(Management and Handling) Rules, 2000 as well as after obtaining EC under the
provisions of EIA Notification, 2006 as amended in 2009 before commissioning of the
MSW facilities. The tribunal also directs the M.C. Shimla to plant at least two times of
the trees i.e. 219 x 2 and double the saplings i.e. 1055 x 2 of the same species which have
been felled by the project proponent to maintain ecological balance.
In Satpal Singh & ors. v. Municipal Council Gardhiwala & Ors75 The applicants
are inhabitants of Gardhiwala town. Admittedly, an open space used as “Hada Rori”
(place for disposal of the carcasses, hide, remains, etc. of dead animals) is situated
adjacent to the local grain market. There is no dispute about the fact that inhabitants of
Gardhiwala town used and are using, the said place for dumping of carcasses, hide and
remains of dead animals. The case put-forth by the applicants is that the carcasses of dead
animals spread over at the place and emit foul smell in the nearby area. The stray dogs
and scavenging birds loiter/hover around the remains of the dead animals, eat up some
parts of the bodies and also scatter bones of the dead animals around the place. The stray
dogs become furious, if passer-by goes near the place. There are some instances of dog
biting the passersby, including children. Thus, it causes nuisance to environment in the
locality. The municipal council failed to perform its obligation to clean the public place
by removing the remains of the dead animals. The Council totally failed to implement
MSW Rules.
With the result the pollution around the place of “Hada Rori” is enhanced and has
reached to the extent of intolerable level. Though, provisions under Section 154 and
Section 168 of the Punjab Municipality Act, 1911 cast duty on the municipal council to
75 National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, dated 25.04.2013, (visited on 06.04.2014), available at:http://www.greentribunal.gov.in/judgment/15-2013(THC)(App)_25April2013_final_order.pdf.
162
remove and dump the remains of dead animals to a proper place and ensure cleanliness in
the township, yet Municipal Council has failed to perform such a duty. The Respondents
also have failed to discharge their obligation. The Punjab Pollution Control Board is
required to monitor implementation of the MSW Rules. However, the Punjab Pollution
Control Board also committed dereliction in discharging such legal obligation. Though,
representations were made by the applicants to the Deputy Commissioner, yet the
Respondents did not pay heed to the requests for appropriate implementation of the MSW
Rules. The dumping ground (Hada Rori) ought to have been shifted to a proper place outside
the limits of the municipal council. The Applicants, therefore, filed the application before the
NGT seeking direction to the Respondents as indicated herein before.
The respondents argued that the MSW Rules are not applicable to the present
case. The disposal of dead animals will be governed by the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911.
They argued that the site of “Hada Rori” does not fall within the limits of municipal
council. They contended that due to non-availability of funds as well as non-availability
of alternative site, it is difficult to relocate the “Hada Rori”. Hence they sought dismissal
of the application.
The NGT found that the respondents are under legal obligation to ensure that
pollution free air is available to the residents of the locality near the site of dumping place
“Hada Rori”. The respondents cannot abdicate their legal responsibility on flimsy
grounds, like absence of fund or absence of land for relocation of “Hada Rori”. The
respondents have failed to implement Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and
Handling) Rules, 2000 and discharge their duties under the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911.
In the result, the NGT allows the application and direct the respondents as follows:
i. The respondents shall take immediate action to shift the dumping ground “Hada
Rori” to a suitable place outside the limits of Municipal Council and if necessary
by acquiring a suitable land, after negotiating with owner of such land and to
complete the shifting process within a period of six months.
ii. The Municipal Council shall construct a parapet wall around the place so selected
for “Hada Rori” with wire mesh affixed at least two (2) feet above on such
163
parapet wall, which shall be of five feet height, in order to avoid entry of stray
dogs in the “Hada Rori” after shifting of the dumping ground.
iii. The Municipal Council shall consult experts as well as the Punjab Pollution
Control Board in order to examine whether the dumping can be made by creating
ditch of appropriate depth. The dead animals, being biodegradable waste, could be
processed to convert them into manure by composting under the provisions of
MSW Rules (Schedule II)if it is found that the same will not cause any adverse
impact on the ground water level and will not cause contamination/pollution of
the ground water. The respondents shall make arrangements for processing of
wastes within a period of one year.
iv. The Punjab pollution control board shall closely monitor the progress on alternate
site selection and construction in “Hada Rori” and shall file affidavit on the
progress once in six months, in the Registry of National Green Tribunal.
In Invertis University & ors. v. Union of India & ors.76 the applicant is a
registered society under the Society Registration Act, 1860. This society is formed to
encourage safeguarding of the environment and other human values in the younger
generation and has been carrying on various activities at the school as well as other levels
in furtherance of plantation, water conservation, water harvesting, etc. As the applicant is
more particularly associated with the students and young generation, it has closely been
following the developments pertaining to the setting up of the MSWM at Village Razau
Paraspur, in Bareilly. They made various representations to the higher authorities, and
even raised a protest in March, 2012. Several village Pradhans signed a memorandum
against locating the project in the vicinity of Village Razau-Paraspur. The MSWM
project is very close to Invertis University, Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management,
SG Hospital, a water body, other villages and even NH 24. All through, the Society has
opposed the establishment of the project at the site in question for various reasons and
having failed to get redressal of its grievances at various administrative or executive
levels, hence they approach the tribunal.
76 National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, dated 18.07.2013 (visited on 06.04.2014),available at: http://www.greentribunal.gov.in/judgment/992013(App)_18July2013_final_order.pdf.
164
After hearing both parties the court makes an order and direct:
a) immediate closure of the municipal solid waste management plant at Razau Paraspur,
Bareilly;
b) by a permanent prohibitory injunction, restraining Municipal Corporation Bareilly
from dumping any municipal waste at the site in question;
c) by a mandatory injunction, Municipal Corporation Bareilly to remove all the
municipal waste dumped at the site within four weeks;
d) the MSWM plant at Razau Paraspur, Bareilly, to be positively shifted to any
appropriate site within the territorial area of the municipality earmarked in the Master
Plan-2021 of Bareilly, for that purpose in consonance with MSW Rules, 2000.
e) Till the above is carried out, municipal corporation Bareilly may continue to dump
Municipal Solid Waste at the existing Solid Waste dumping grounds other than the
site in question for which Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board should provide clear
guidelines for site preparation, dumping, compaction, soil layering, disinfectant spray
etc. forthwith.
f) The site in question should be restored and developed as per master plan 2021.
4.10. Conclusion
India currently is facing a municipal solid waste dilemma, for which all elements
of the society are responsible. The community sensitization and public awareness is low.
There is no system of segregation of organic, inorganic and recyclable waste at household
level. There is an inadequate legal framework existing in the country to address
Municipal Solid Waste Management. What more is lacking is its implementation. In spite
of a stringent legislation in place, open dumping is the most wide spread form of waste
disposal. The possible reasons for poor implementation could be a combination of social,
technical, institutional and financial issues. Public awareness, political will and public
participation are essential for the successful implementation of the legal provisions
The informal policy of encouraging the public to separate MSW and market it
directly to the informal network appears to be a better option. The involvement of people
and private sector through NGOs could improve the efficiency of MSWM. Public
165
awareness should be created among masses to inculcate the health hazards of the wastes.
Littering of MSW should be prohibited in cities, towns and urban areas notified by the
state government.
Moreover, house-to-house collection of MSW should be organized through
methods like collection on regular pre-informed timing and scheduling. The collection
bins must be appropriately designed with features like metallic containers with lids and to
have a large enough capacity to accommodate 20% more than the expected waste
generation in the area, with a design for mechanical loading and un-loading, placement at
appropriate locations, etc. Municipal authorities should maintain the storage facilities in
such a manner that they do not create unhygienic and unsanitary conditions. Proper
maintenance of the MSW transportation vehicles must be conducted and the Dumper
Placer should replace the old transportation vehicles in a phased manner.