Upload
khairy-elsayed
View
9
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Multi -- objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb
Citation preview
MultiMulti--objective Optimization objective Optimization of an Americaof an Americas Cup Class Yacht Bulbs Cup Class Yacht Bulb
Matteo Ledri, Mauro Poian, Giorgio Contento
Multi-objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb2
IntroductionIntroduction
The present work is focused on the optimization of the bulb shape of an IACC (International Americas Cup Class)
There are no restrictions for the bulb shape according to the class rules (v 5.0)The weight has been fixed to maintain the same displacement of the boat
Multi-objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb3
Problem definitionProblem definition
The bulb of an IACC yacht represents the 80% of the boat total weight.
The main features of an optimal design are:
Minimum drag to decrease the total resistance of the boat
Low centre of gravity to increase the righting moment(maximum draft according to the AC rule v 5.0 : 4.1m)
Multi-objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb4
Problem definitionProblem definition
The optimization process consists of three phases:
Parametric modeling of the geometry (CATIA v5)
Automatic meshing (ICEMCFD)
CFD analysis (CFX5)
Multi-objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb5
Parameterization strategyParameterization strategy
An initial ellipsoid is modified with Bezier curves to obtain a fair shape: Three input variables define the ellipsoid semi-axes Three Bezier curves are defined by a set of control points The coordinates of the Bezier curves are summed to the ellipsoid coordinates to
obtain the final shape of the profiles A set of sections is created using the profiles in x, y, z directions A lofted surface of the bulb is created using the sections
20 input variables: A,B,C: ellipsoid semi-axes X_top1, Z_top1, X_top2, Z_top2: coordinates of the control points to modify
the top profile of the bulb X_bottom1, Z_bottom1, X_bottom2, Z_bottom2: coordinates of the control
points to modify the bottom profile of the bulb X_side1, Y_side1, X_side2, Y_side2, X_side3, Y_side3 : coordinates of the
control points to modify the side view of the bulb m, n: parameters of the top and bottom section curves tail: dimension of the bulb tail relative to the bulb breadth
Multi-objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb6
Parameterization strategyParameterization strategy
X_top1,Y_top1
X_top2,Y_top2
Ellipsoid top profile modification using bezier curve
Multi-objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb7
Parameterization strategyParameterization strategy
Effect of parameters m and n on the section shape
Effect of parameter C on the section shape
Multi-objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb8
MeshMesh generationgeneration
The computational domain has been meshed using ICEMCFD Reference lines to build the blocking imported from CATIA v5 Mesh Size: 2M Hexa Cells
Multi-objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb9
CFD AnalysisCFD Analysis
The flow analysis has been performed using CFX 5.7.1
Automatic preprocessing using recorded script Parallel execution Automatic postprocessing
Simulation data:
Inlet Normal Speed: 5 m/s Turbulence Model: SST Convergence Criteria: Residual RMS < 1.0E-05
Multi-objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb10
Workflow setupWorkflow setupInput variables
Input, Output, Transfer files
Output variables
Objectives and Constraints
Logic flow
Multi-objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb11
Parallel processingParallel processing
Two degrees of parallelization have been implemented:
Parallel CFD analysis Domain partitioning Parallel optimization Submission of concurrent designs
Job performed on a Linux Cluster with 12 CPUs
4 concurrent designs 3 partitions for each design
Multi-objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb12
ResultsResults
Multi-objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb13
ResultsResults
Minimum Drag
Lowest VCG
Best Trade-off
Multi-objective Optimization of an America's Cup Class Yacht Bulb14
Conclusion and further developmentsConclusion and further developments
A procedure for the development of an optimized bulb shape has been investigated solving practical problems related to:
Parameterization of geometry Automatic meshing CFD analysis
Results could be further improved by means of:
Use of the CFX transitional model in the CFD analysis Validation of the CFD model with experimental tests Integration of the results into a custom VPP (Velocity Prediction Program) to
evaluate the difference of boat speed due to drag and stability variations Comparison between different optimization algorithms applied to this problem
Multi-objective Optimization of an Americas Cup Class Yacht BulbIntroductionProblem definitionProblem definitionParameterization strategyParameterization strategyParameterization strategyMesh generationCFD AnalysisWorkflow setupParallel processingResultsResultsConclusion and further developments