Upload
meagan-foot
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.1
W e e k
77MANAGEMENT OF MANAGEMENT OF
INFORMATION SYSTEM INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT AND PROJECT AND
IMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATION
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.2
CAPITAL BUDGET:
• PAYBACK METHOD: How long will it take to pay back the investment?
• RETURN ON INVESTMENT: Does return during useful life of an item exceed the cost to borrow money?
• COST-BENEFIT RATIO: Does the ratio of benefit versus cost exceed 1?
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.3
CAPITAL BUDGET:
• PROFITABILITY INDEX: What is the ratio of present value of cash inflow to initial investment?
• NET PRESENT VALUE: Accounting for cost, earnings & time value of money what is the investment worth?
• INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN: Accounting for the time value of money, what is the return rate of an investment?
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.4
COSTS:
• HARDWARE
• SOFTWARE
• SERVICES
• PERSONNEL
*
COSTS & BENEFITS:
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.5
TANGIBLE BENEFIT:
• INCREASED PRODUCTIVITY
• LOW OPERATING COSTS
• REDUCED WORK FORCE
• LOWER COMPUTER EXPENSES
• LOWER VENDOR COSTS
• LOWER CLERICAL/PROFESSIONAL COSTS
• REDUCED GROWTH OF EXPENSES
• REDUCED FACILITY COSTS
*
COSTS & BENEFITS:
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.6
INTANGIBLE BENEFIT:• IMPROVED ASSET USE; RESOURCE CONTROL; PLANNING• INCREASED FLEXIBILITY• MORE TIMELY INFORMATION• INCREASED LEARNING• ATTAIN LEGAL REQUIREMENTS• ENHANCED EMPLOYEE GOODWILL, JOB SATISFACTION,
DECISION MAKING, OPERATIONS• HIGHER CLIENT SATISFACTION• BETTER CORPORATE IMAGE
*
COSTS & BENEFITS:
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.7
LIMITATIONS:
• Assume all relevant alternatives have been examined; cost & benefits can be expressed as $$
• Ignore intangible benefits
*
CAPITAL BUDGETING MODELS
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.8
PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS:
ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS TO DETERMINE RISKS & BENEFITS
• DETERMINE DESIRABLE FEATURES, ACCEPTABLE RISKS OF REQUIRED SYSTEM
• GENERATE PORTFOLIO OF CHARACTERISTICS, RISKS FOR EACH ALTERNATIVE
• SCORING MODEL
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.9
• IDENTIFY DESIRABLE FEATURES• PROVIDE WEIGHTS FOR EACH (ADD TO
1.00)• LOOK AT EACH ALTERNATIVE:
– WHICH FEATURES ARE PRESENT?– TO WHAT EXTENT (as an amount)?– SCORE THE ALTERNATIVE
• RANK-ORDER THE ALTERNATIVES• SELECT HIGHEST RANKED OPTION
*
SCORING MODEL:
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.10
REAL OPTIONS PRICING MODELS
• USEFUL UNDER UNCERTAIN CONDITIONS
• INCLUDE ESTIMATES FOR MANAGEMENT LEARNING, VALUE OF DELAYING DECISION, VOLATILITY OF COSTS & REVENUES
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.11
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
WHAT PROCESSES ARE BEST TO CHANGE:
• DESIGN
• DATA
• COST
• OPERATIONS
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.12
CHANGE AGENT
DURING IMPLEMENTATION, INDIVIDUAL ACTS AS CATALYST DURING CHANGE PROCESS TO ENSURE SUCCESS
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.13
APPROACHES ADOPTION MANAGEMENT ROUTINIZATION
ACTORS' ROLE XXXX XXXX
STRATEGY XXXX
ORGANIZATIONAL XXXX XXXXFACTORS
IMPLEMENTATION STAGESIMPLEMENTATION STAGES
ALL ACTIVITIES LEADING TO ADOPTION, MANAGEMENT, ROUTINIZATION OF INNOVATION
IMPLEMENTATION
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.14
INNOVATION PROCESSACTOR CHARACTERISTICS & DEMOGRAPHICS
SOCIAL STATUS
EDUCATION
SOPHISTICATION
ACTOR ROLES
PRODUCT CHAMPION
BUREAUCRATIC ENTREPRENEUR
GATEKEEPER
INNOVATIVE
BEHAVIOR
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.15
ACTIONS & INDICATORS FOR SUCCESSFUL SYSTEM
IMPLEMENTATION• SUPPORT BY LOCAL FUNDS• NEW ORGANIZATIONAL ARRANGEMENTS• STABLE SUPPLY & MAINTENANCE• NEW PERSONNEL CLASSIFICATIONS• CHANGES IN ORGANIZATIONAL AUTHORITY
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.16
ACTIONS & INDICATORS FOR SUCCESSFUL SYSTEM
IMPLEMENTATION• INTERNALIZATION OF TRAINING PROGRAM• CONTINUAL UPDATING OF THE SYSTEM• PROMOTION OF KEY PERSONNEL• SURVIVAL OF SYSTEM AFTER TURNOVER• ATTAINMENT OF WIDESPREAD USE
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.17
FACTORS IN IMPLEMENTATION OUTCOME
CAUSES OF SUCCESS OR FAILURE:
• USER INVOLVEMENT & INFLUENCE
• MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
• LEVEL OF COMPLEXITY / RISK
• MANAGEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.18
USER-DESIGNER COMMUNICATIONS GAP
DIFFERENCES IN BACKGROUNDS, INTERESTS, PRIORITIES
IMPEDE COMMUNICATION AND PROBLEM SOLVING
AMONG END USERS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SPECIALISTS
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.19
USER CONCERNS:
WILL SYSTEM DELIVER INFORMATION I NEED?
HOW QUICKLY CAN I ACCESS DATA?
HOW EASILY CAN I RECEIVE DATA?
HOW MUCH CLERICAL SUPPORT WILL I NEED FOR DATA ENTRY?
HOW WILL SYSTEM OPERATION FIT INTO MY DAILY BUSINESS SCHEDULE?
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.20
DESIGNER CONCERNS:
HOW MUCH DISK SPACE WILL MASTER FILE CONSUME?
HOW MANY LINES OF PROGRAM CODE WILL THIS FUNCTION TAKE?
HOW CAN WE REDUCE CPU TIME?
WHAT IS THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY OF STORING THIS DATA?
WHAT DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SHOULD WE USE?
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.21
LEVEL OF COMPLEXITY & RISK
• PROJECT SIZE
• PROJECT STRUCTURE
• EXPERTISE WITH TECHNOLOGY
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.22
CONTROLLING PROJECT RISK
LOW HIGH SMALL HIGH LOW HIGH LARGE VERY HIGH LOW LOW SMALL VERY LOW LOW LOW LARGE LOW HIGH HIGH SMALL MEDIUM-LOW HIGH HIGH LARGE MEDIUM HIGH LOW SMALL VERY LOW
STRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY LEVEL SIZE RISK HIGH LOW LARGE LOW
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.23
CONSEQUENCES OF POOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT
• COST OVERRUNS
• TIME SLIPPAGE
• TECHNICAL SHORTFALLS
• FAILURE TO OBTAIN BENEFITS
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.24
CAUSES OF POOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT
• IGNORANCE & OPTIMISM
• MYTHICAL MAN-MONTH: Many tasks sequentially linked, require training
• FALLING BEHIND: Bad news travels slowly upward
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.25
CHANGE MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES
• ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS: High risk of failure, replacing legacy systems, myriad interconnections
• BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING: 70% failure rate, deeply rooted in old processes, employees often unprepared
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.26
CHANGE MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES
• MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS: Decline in shareholder value, difficult to integrate company systems, organizational change, worker morale
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.27
MANAGING IMPLEMENTATION:
CONTROL RISK FACTORS: Gear tools, methodologies to level of risk
INTERNAL INTEGRATION TOOLS:
• FORMAL PLANNING TOOLS
• FORMAL CONTROL TOOLS
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.28
FORMAL PLANNING TOOLSEXAMPLES:
• PROGRAM EVALUATION & REVIEW TECHNIQUE: Diagram of project activities, sequential and concurrent, shows interactions of activities
• GANTT CHART: Shows activities as bars along a time line, with beginning, end of each task
THESE PROVIDE SCHEDULES
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.29
FORMAL CONTROL TOOLS:
BUDGET: Time, money, resources
• MONITOR PROGRESS: Completion of tasks, fulfillment of goals
• CONTROL RISK FACTORS: Cost/benefits
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.30
EXTERNAL INTEGRATION TOOLS
• LINK ALL USERS THROUGHOUT ORGANIZATION
• USE END USERS AS TEAM MEMBERS
• SHARE INFORMATION & PROGRESS
• INCLUDE TRAINING
• AVOID COUNTERIMPLEMENTATION
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.31
ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS
• JOB DESIGN
• STANDARDS & PERFORMANCE MONITORING
• ERGONOMICS: Interaction of people & machines; jobs, health, interface
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.32
ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS
• EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES
• HEALTH & SAFETY
• GOVERNMENT REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.33
ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS
MONITOR PROGRESS: Completion of tasks, fulfillment of goals
CONTROL RISK FACTORS: Cost / benefits
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.34
ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACT ANALYSIS: How will system impact structure, attitudes, decision-making, operations
SOCIOTECHNICAL DESIGN: Explore group structures, task allocation, job design for human factor
*
ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.35
“FOURTH-GENERATION” PROJECT MANAGEMENT
• EMERGING TECHNIQUES TO DEAL WITH COMPLEXITY
• ENTERPRISE-WIDE FOCUS
• DRIVEN BY STRATEGIC VISION & TECHNOLOGY
• MAY REQUIRE SEPARATE PROGRAM OFFICE
*
Muhamad Abduh Institut Teknologi Bandung 7.36
W e e k
77MANAGEMENT OF MANAGEMENT OF
INFORMATION SYSTEM INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT AND PROJECT AND
IMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATION