View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MM SSSSII NNIIOOIMPOSSIBL
EGrade 3 Proficient Reader
Your Mission, Reading First Leaders,
As You Decided to Choose It…Was/Is to ensure that all
children in Oregon learn to read well by the end of third
grade.
Not an easy mission…
But you were up for the challenge.
FAILURE WAS NOT
AN OPTION
Celebrating Our Successes
Oregon Reading First Schools
April 2008
Do not go where the path may lead; go instead where there is no path and leave a trail
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Thank your for being “trailblazers” in this important journey of helping students learn to read!
There have been increases in the percent of students at
low risk across all grade levels and all measures …
Oregon Reading First Success Stories
Cohort A has Increased the Percent of Students at Low Risk!
Winter Year 1 Winter Year 5
Kindergarten - PSF 44% 74% (+30)
Kindergarten - NWF 38% 66% (+28)
First Grade - NWF 32% 65% (+33)
First Grade - ORF 32% 51% (+19)
Second Grade - ORF 39% 57% (+18)
Third Grade - ORF 34% 49% (+15)
Cohort B has Increased the Percent of Students at Low Risk!
Winter Year 1 Winter Year 5
Kindergarten - PSF 47% 70% (+23)
Kindergarten - NWF 38% 60% (+22)
First Grade - NWF 34% 52% (+18)
First Grade - ORF 31% 41% (+10)
Second Grade - ORF 42% 53% (+9)
Third Grade - ORF 30% 47% (+17)
Oregon Reading First Success Stories
There have been decreases in the percent of students at risk across all grade levels
and all measures …
Cohort A Has Decreased the Percent of Students At Risk!
Winter Year 1 Winter Year 5
Kindergarten - PSF 30% 11% (-19)
Kindergarten - NWF 38% 14% (-24)
First Grade - NWF 27% 10% (-17)
First Grade - ORF 33% 16% (-17)
Second Grade - ORF 48% 31% (-17)
Third Grade - ORF 42% 27% (-15)
Cohort B Has Decreased the Percent of Students At Risk!
Winter Year 1 Winter Year 5
Kindergarten - PSF 27% 11% (-16)
Kindergarten - NWF 39% 16% (-13)
First Grade - NWF 27% 15% (-12)
First Grade - ORF 34% 23% (-11)
Second Grade - ORF 45% 30% (-15)
Third Grade - ORF 45% 28% (-17)
Reading is a basic tool in the giving of a good life.
- Mortimer J. Adler
Thanks for your contribution in giving students this lifetime tool.
School Success Stories
Cohort A
Cohort B
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
Woodlawn Elementary increased the percent of students at Low Risk in Kindergarten on NWF
from 30% to 97% !
Schools with a 40% or greater increase in the percent of students at
Low Risk on NWF in Kindergarten
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
50% or greater increase!
School Percent Change
Mooberry +57%
West Powellhurst +54%
Lent +50%
40% or greater increase!
School Percent Change
David Hill +49%
Scott +45%
Lot Whitcomb +44%
Cherry Park +43%
Sunrise +43%
Alameda +42%
Lincoln +40%
May Roberts +40%
Cohort A
Schools with 80% or more of their students at Low Risk on NWF in Kindergarten
SchoolPercent of Students
at Low Risk
Oak Grove 84%
Boise-Eliot 82%
Howard 81%
Cohort A(Spring 2004)
W.L. Henry decreased the percent of students At Risk in Kindergarten on NWF from
51% to just 5%!
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
Great leaders are never satisfied with current levels of performance. They are restlessly driven by possibilities and with potential achievements.
- Donna Harrison
Thank you for your perseverance and determination to achieve those potential
achievements.
School Percent Change
School Percent Change
West Powellhurst -38% Cherry Park -32%
Lot Whitcomb -35% Lent -32%
Sunrise -33% May Roberts -32%
Woodlawn -33% Lincoln Park -31%
Alameda -32% David Hill -30%
Schools with a 30% or greater decrease in the percent of students At Risk on NWF in Kindergarten
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
Schools with 10% or less of their students At Risk on NWF in Kindergarten
SchoolPercent of Students
At Risk
Howard 2%
Jackson 4%
Jefferson 4%
Oak Grove 6%
Boise Eliot 7%
Humboldt 7%
Whitman 9%
Myrtle Creek 9%
Cohort A(Spring 2004)
David Hill increased the percent of students at Low Risk in First Grade
on ORF from 30% to 86% AND decreased the percent of students
At Risk from 44% to just 4%!
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
School Percent Change
Washington +40%
Jefferson +38%
Grove/Freewater +37%
Cherry Park +33%
Jackson +32%
Lincoln Park +32%
Ventura Park +30%
Schools with a 30% or greater increase in the percent of students at Low Risk on ORF in First Grade
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
Schools with a 30% or greater decrease in the percent of students At Risk on ORF in First Grade
School Percent Change
Washington -34%
Humboldt -32%
Tri City -30%
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
Humboldt Elementary increased the percent of
students at Low Risk on ORF in Second Grade from 31% to
76%!
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
Schools with a 30% or greater increase in the percent of students at Low Risk on ORF in Second Grade
School Percent Change
Grove/Freewater +36%
David Hill +33%
Lincoln Park +33%
Whitman +32%
Ventura Park +30%
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
Both Humboldt and Woodlawn Elementary schools had a 38%
decrease in the percent of students At Risk on ORF in the
Second Grade!
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
Schools with a 30% or greater decrease in the percent of students At Risk on ORF in Second Grade
School Percent Change
Jefferson -35%
Lincoln Park -31%
Sunrise -31%
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
The whole world opened to me when I learned to read.
- Mary McLeod Bethune
Thank you opening this world to the students in Oregon
Scott Elementary increased the percent of students at Low Risk on ORF in Third Grade
from 26% to 74%!
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
Schools with a 30% or greater increase in the percent of students at Low Risk on ORF in Third Grade
School Percent Change
Lincoln Park +43%
Lent +41%
Cherry Park +39%
Whitman +34%
Humboldt +32%
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
May Roberts decreased the percent of students At Risk on ORF in Third Grade from 64%
to 23%!
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
Schools with a 30% or greater decrease in the percent of students At Risk on ORF in Third Grade
School Percent Change
Lent -34%
Humboldt -32%
Cohort A(Spring 2004-Spring 2007)
Good reading instruction…
“It’s almost like an army attacking on different fronts at the same time. Training is one front. People and materials are another front. Time is another. Part of the school’s success is coordinating all of those issues.”
- Greg Fancher, director of Elementary Education, Kennewick, WA
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
Jason Lee Elementary increased the percent of students at Low Risk in
Kindergarten on NWF from 49% to 86%!
Schools with a 25% or greater increase in the percent of students at Low Risk on NWF in Kindergarten
School Percent Change
King +35%
Green +29%
Marysville +29%
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
Marysville Elementary decreased the percent of
students At Risk in Kindergarten on NWF from
50% to 17%!
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
Schools with a 10% or greater increase in the percent of students at Low Risk on NWF in Kindergarten
School Percent Change
Jason Lee -22%
King -19%
Earl Boyles -14%
Green -11%
Margaret Scott -11%
McNary Heights -11%
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
Martin Luther King, Jr. Elementary increased the percent of students at Low Risk in First Grade on ORF from 35% to 69% AND decreased
the percent of students At Risk from 32% to just 4%!
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
Schools with a 20% or greater increase in the percent of students at Low Risk on ORF in First Grade
School Percent Change
Toledo +31%
Fern Hill +23%
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
Schools with a 20% or greater decrease in the percent of students At Risk on ORF in First Grade
School Percent Change
Jason Lee -22%
Margaret Scott -21%
Toledo -20%
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
“Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.”
- John Adams (1765)
Thank you for engaging in this audacious effort with us!
Liberty Elementary increased the percent of students at Low Risk in Second Grade on ORF from 46%
to 70% AND decreased the percent of students At Risk from 46% to
21%!
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
Schools with a 15% or greater increase in the percent of students at Low Risk on ORF in Second Grade
School Percent Change
Rigler +21%
Marysville +18%
King +17%
Earl Boyles +16%
McNary Heights +16%
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
Schools with a 15% or greater decrease in the percent of students At Risk on ORF in Second Grade
School Percent Change
McNary Heights -21%
King -18%
Faulconer-Chapman -17%
Margaret Scott -17%
Marysville -15%
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
Liberty Elementary increased the percent of students at Low Risk in Third Grade on ORF
from 24% to 50%!
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
Schools with a 15% or greater increase in the percent of students at Low Risk on ORF in Third Grade
School Percent Change
Madras +18%
Hallman +17%
McNary Heights +17%
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
Margaret Scott Elementary decreased the percent of
students At Risk in Third Grade on ORF from 48% to 27%!
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
Schools with a 15% or greater decrease in the percent of students At Risk on ORF in Third Grade
School Percent Change
Hallman -20%
King -18%
Liberty -18%
Toledo -16%
Cohort BSpring 2006-Spring 2007
“An ounce of performance is worth pounds of promises.”
- Mae West
Cohort B
Greatest Increase in Percent at Low Riskfrom Winter 2005 to Winter 2008
Kindergarten
Measure School Winter 2005 Winter 2008 Percent Change
Kindergarten (PSF) Jason Lee 38% 82% +44%
Kindergarten (NWF) Jason Lee 16% 78% +62%
Amazing Winter Data!
Cohort B
Greatest Decrease in Percent At Riskfrom Winter 2005 to Winter 2008
Kindergarten
Measure School Winter 2005 Winter 2008 Percent Change
Kindergarten (PSF) Hallman 47% 17% -30%
Kindergarten (NWF) Hallman 79% 22% -57%
Amazing Winter Data!
Cohort B
Greatest Increase in Percent at Low Risk AND Greatest Decrease in Percent At Risk on NWF in First Grade
from Winter 2005 to Winter 2008
Winter 2005 Winter 2008 Percent Change
Percent of Students at Low Risk 15% 66% +51%
Percent of Students at Some Risk 46% 26% -20%
Percent of Students At Risk 39% 8% -31%
Toledo Elementary
Amazing Winter Data!
Cohort B
Greatest Increase in Percent at Low Risk AND Greatest Decrease in Percent At Risk on ORF in First Grade
from Winter 2005 to Winter 2008
Winter 2005 Winter 2008 Percent Change
Percent of Students at Low Risk 0% 36% +36%
Percent of Students at Some Risk 41% 41% 0%
Percent of Students At Risk 59% 23% -36%
Jason Lee Elementary
Amazing Winter Data!
Cohort B
Greatest Increase in Percent at Low Riskon ORF in Second Grade
from Winter 2005 to Winter 2008
Winter 2005 Winter 2008 Percent Change
Percent of Students at Low Risk 51% 73% +22%
Percent of Students at Some Risk 17% 7% -10%
Percent of Students At Risk 32% 20% -12%
Witch Hazel Elementary
Amazing Winter Data!
Cohort B
Greatest Decrease in Percent At Riskon ORF in Second Grade
from Winter 2005 to Winter 2008
Winter 2005 Winter 2008 Percent Change
Percent of Students At Risk 51% 23% -28%
Faulconer-Chapman
Marysville
Winter 2005 Winter 2008 Percent Change
Percent of Students At Risk 53% 25% -28%
Amazing Winter Data!
Cohort B
Greatest Increase in Percent at Low Riskon ORF in Third Grade
from Winter 2005 to Winter 2008
Winter 2005 Winter 2008 Percent Change
Percent of Students at Low Risk 20% 62% +42%
Percent of Students at Some Risk 38% 16% -22%
Percent of Students At Risk 42% 22% -20%
Liberty Elementary
Amazing Winter Data!
Cohort B
Greatest Increase in Percent At Riskon ORF in Third Grade
from Winter 2005 to Winter 2008
Winter 2005 Winter 2008 Percent Change
Percent of Students at Low Risk 26% 45% +19%
Percent of Students at Some Risk 7% 22% +15%
Percent of Students At Risk 67% 33% -34%
Hallman Elementary
Amazing Winter Data!
“The ultimate purpose of reading instruction is to help children acquire the skills that enable learning from, understanding, and enjoyment of written language.”
- Joe Torgesen (1998)
At the State Level
Across Oregon, we are increasing the percentage of students reaching proficiency on important formative and summative goals and decreasing the percentage of students significantly below proficiency levels!
At the district-level
We have a solid foundation and a replicable model to support positive achievement for children.
At the school-level
We have many shining examples across and within each of our districts!
At the student level
Each year more students are reaching the highest levels of proficiency.
Each year dramatically less students are at the highest levels of risk that would typically forecast chronically negative outcomes.