Upload
ella
View
34
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
MSJC Stats Headcount Demographics Diversity Repeaters College Going Rates Assessment Success Rates On-Line LRC Transfers Programs. MSJC – R&P Dept. – XCHASX 6.5.9. Headcounts have increased significantly over the past decade. estimate. MSJC Unduplicated Headcount* in 1,000. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
MSJC Stats•Headcount•Demographics•Diversity•Repeaters•College Going Rates•Assessment•Success Rates•On-Line•LRC•Transfers•Programs
MSJC – R&P Dept. – XCHASX 6.5.9
12.311.1
8.1 8.3
11.6
13.914.9
16.418.3
19.2 19.918.1 18.6 18.7
20.8
22.9
25.7
92-'93
93-'94
94-'95
95-'96
96-'97
97-'98
98-'99
99-'00
00-'01
01-'02
02-'03
03-'04
04-'05
05-'06
06-'07
07-'08
08-'09E
Headcounts have increased significantly over the past decade
MSJC Unduplicat
ed Headcount*
in 1,000
* Include credit and non-credit Source: California Community Chancellor’s Office Data Mart –MSJC R&PD – XCJH 6.5.9
By Academic Year
estimate
65% vs.18% CAGR 5% vs. 2%
% chg vs. yr ago11%
10%9%
6%5%
4% 4%2%
-2%
Mt.SAC
MSJC RCC S. Bern Palo Chaf COD State MiraC
5%
4%4%
2%2%
1% 1% 1% 1%
MSJC Mt.SAC
RCC Chaf Palo State S.Bern
COD MiraC
CAGR for past 10 yrs
65%55%
25% 24%18% 14% 12% 10% 6%
MSJC Mt. SAC Chaf RCC Palo State MiraC COD S. Bern
% chg vs. 10 yrs ago Local CCC’s
Headcount AY2007-’08
Source: California Community College Chancellor’s Office Data Mart R&P Dept. XCJH 8.15.08
Headcount MSJC vs. CCC Statewide
% Growth
-10%
-6%
-27%
-2%
3% 2%
39%
6%
20%
5%8%
4%
10%
5%
12%
4%
5%6% 4%1%
-9% -10%
3%
-1%
0%1%
12%
3%
10%
2%
10%5%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
93-'94
94-'95
95-'96
96-'97
97-'98
98-'99
99-'00
00-'01
01-'02
02-'03
03-'04
04-'05
05-'06
06-'07
07-'08
08-'09E
MSJC has experienced higher highs & lower lows than CCC statewide
*Unduplicated and includes credit and Office Data Mart –MSJC R&PD – XCJH 1.30.9
estimate
AY 01-'02 02-'03 03-'04 04-'05 05-'06 06-'07 07-'08 08-'09
4,268 4,6603,437 3,883
4,1005,141
6,5167,477
12,128
12,735 12,595 12,832 12,80713,781
15,629
17,260
12,68513,239
12,235 12,781 12,595
14,244 14,749
18,000ESummer Fall Spring
MSJC FA’08 enrollment broke the 17,000 headcount mark
Source: California Community Chancellor’s Office Data Mart –MSJC R&PD – XCJH 1.30.9
The “% of cap” is increasing
72%
85%77%
81%
38%
70%
87%
SP08 SP08 FA07 FA08 FA09 SU08 SU09
Source: MSJC D.S.S. as of Sunday 6.7.9 , * based on 6 & 8 wk classes – MSJC R&P Dept.
Sections 1,749 1,825 1,651 1,826 1,751 463 192% chg. 4% 11% -4% -59%Seats 52,518 54,657 49,631 54,223 55,088 14,448 6,070% chg. 4% 9% 1% -58%FTES 4,555 5,484 4,624 5,301 1,133 673
20% 15% -40%
lllllll
SJC & MVC continues to set new highs…enrollment grew by double digit in SP’09
11,346
10,707
9,7139,259
8,8418,132
7,6527,3017,703
7,1266,392
7,087
5,8615,4395,2185,065
4,500
8,500
12,500
FA'05 SP'06 FA'06 SP'07 FA'07 SP'08 FA'08 SP'09
MVCSJCHeadcount*
*Headcount at 1st Census, headcount maybe multi-campus/ DataTel (MSJC) & Data-Mart (CCCCO) numbers vary. DataTel is a snapshot of enrollment on a given date & does not include non-credit & includes 1st census only. Data Mart is the official CCCCO headcount. I-15 Corridor includes TEC (Temecula Education Complex) & Lake Elsinore (LEUSD) activity. Chaparral H.S. (TVUSD) activity is currently included in the MVC service area but will be included in the I-15 Corridor service area starting FA09 Source: MSJC DataTel/ MSJC R&P Dept. XCHASX.3.89
+17% vs. SP’08
+21% vs. SP’08
I-15 Corridor & The Pass in SP’09 grew by over 45% in both service areas.
1,0901,187
1,3661,498 1,428
1,9642,095
1,242
0
19419389 68 60
147 132
0
700
1,400
2,100
FA'05 SP'06 FA'06 SP'07 FA'07 SP'08 FA'08 SP'09
I-15 CorridorThe Pass
Headcount*
*Headcount at 1st Census, headcount maybe multi-campus/ DataTel (MSJC) & Data-Mart (CCCCO) numbers vary. DataTel is a snapshot of enrollment on a given date & does not include non-credit & includes 1st census only. Data Mart is the official CCCCO headcount. I-15 Corridor includes TEC (Temecula Education Complex) & Lake Elsinore (LEUSD) activity. Chaparral H.S. (TVUSD) activity is currently included in the MVC service area but will be included in the I-15 Corridor service area starting FA09 Source: MSJC DataTel/ MSJC R&P Dept. XCHASX.3.8.9
+47% vs. SP’08
+47% vs. SP’08
MSJC district total FTE-student & headcount growth is expected to continue … AY2008-’09 is projected to increase in FTES by 13% & 12% in headcount
9,672
8,7128,558
7,199
7,788
6,726
7,970
10,205
11,552
20,843
18,685
18,62418,094
19,207
19,947
18,345
25,700
22,895
6,500
9,500
12,500
'00- '01 '01- '02 '02- '03 '03- '04 '04- '05 '05- '06 '06- '07 '07- '08 '08- '09proj.
FTES
*
18,000
20,000
22,000
24,000
26,000
Headcount*
FTES Headcount
*Include credit & non-credit, projections for headcount based on actual SU08 /FA08 (CCCCO-Data Mart) & SP09 estimate (XENR –DataTel), projection for FTES based on P2 Source: CCCCO.edu headcount, Fiscal Data Abstract FTES excludes non-resident . MSJC R&P Dept. XCHASX.4.15.9
Projections
+12%
+13%
Estimated # of Students that live in MSJCD & Attend Neighboring CCC
… students that live in our district attend other CCC...approximately 5% (725-850) of our students
live outside the MSJC District.
Source: Data is based on zip code or city location headcounts for FA’07 or FA’06 supplied by the respective CCC. The estimates should be used for directional and comparative purposes only. MSJC R&PD – C. Hawkins 8/10/08
MSJC - Age of StudentsBy Academic Year
Under 25 25 to 29 30 to 49 50 +
49%
10%
30%
10%
53%
11%
28%
8%
57%
12%
24%
7%
AY 2001-'02 AY 2004-'05 AY 2007-'08
MSJC… getting younger… 57% of all students are under 25 yrs. of age.
Source: CCCCO Data Mart 6.8.9
MSJC - Age of StudentsRelative to Statewide
AY 2007-’08
Under 25 25 to 29 30 to 49 50 +
51%
13%
24%
12%
57%
12%
24%
7%
CCC Statewide MSJ C
A larger % of MSJC students are < 25 relative to the statewide (51%).
Source: CCCCO-Data Mart 6.8.9
Gender of StudentsAY 2007-’08
MSJ C CCC Statewide
61% 54%
38% 45%
1% 1%Unknown
Male
Female
Females account for 6 out of 10 MSJC students& 54% of CCC students
Source: CCCCO-Data Mart 1.30.9
47%
1st Generation
Source: DataTel 3/10/08, based on SP07- 13,339 credit headcount
Approximately ½ of MSJC students are 1st generation college
*Estimated using Federal TRIO Program 2008 Annual Low income Levels
MSJC HH Income Index (Calif. = 100)
100
128 125
90 8875
68 64 63 57
Calif . Murr. Tem. Riv.C. Lak. Perr. Ban. S.J . Beau. Hem.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 – QuickFacts.Census.Gov
Person below poverty 14% 4% 7% 14% 17% 20% 20% 20% 20% 16%
100
122103
96 93
56
Calif . O.C. SD. Co. Riv.Co. S.Bern. I mper.
(1999)$47,493
$59,928(2007)
MSJC - Student Ethnicity By Academic Year
24.0%
54.5%
5.2%
2.0%2.4%
1.6%9.0%
28.9%
45.1%
7.2%3.8%3.1%
1.4%8.4%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
2002 - '03 2007 - '08
Unkn./Decline
Pacific Is.
Other
Native Amer.
Asian
Filipino
Black/A.A.
White
Hispanic
MSJC Hispanic population increased 6 pts. in the past 5 yrs to 28.9%.The Asian/Filipino population up approximately 3 pts. to 6.9%
Black population up 2 pts. to 7.2%
Source: CCCCO-Data Mart 3/21/08
MSJC - Student Ethnicity 2007-08Relative to Riverside County & CCC Statewide – AY2006-’07
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
MSJ C Riverside Co.* CCC Statewide California*
28.9%42.2%
29.4% 35.9%
45.1%
44.1%
34.3%43.1%
6.9%
5.4%
15.6%
12.4%7.2%
6.6%
7.5%
6.7%
1.4%
1.4%
0.8%
1.2%1.4%2.2%0.8%
0.3%
0.7%
0.4%
8.4% 9.5%
Unkn./Decline
Pacific Islander
Other
Native Amer.
Black/A.A.
Asian
White
Hispanic
Source: CCCCO-Data Mart 8/8/8 MSJC & CCC Statewide AY2006-’07 / *U.S. Census Bureau - Riverside Co. and CA. 2006 est.; MSJC R&P Dept. XCJH 1.30.9
MSJC Hispanic population is slightly below CCC statewide average & underrepresented relative to Riverside Co.
MSJC Diversity Trend… since 2000 student diversity has increased by 15 pts to 47% as employee diversity increased by 10 pts. to 31%
30% 31%
23%
31%28%25%22%21%
27%
FA00 FA01 FA02 FA03 FA04 FA05 FA06 FA07 FA08
Source: CCCCO MIS Database –excludes White (57.7%-45.1%) & unknown(10.0%-8.4%) - MSJC R&P Dept. 6.10.9
34% 37%40%
45% 47%
32% 35%38%
43%
1999-'00
2000-'01
2001-'02
2002-'03
2003-'04
2004-'05
2005-'06
2006-'07
2007-'08
Students
Employees341
out of 1,097
10,652 out of 22,895
College
% Diversity
Employees
Student Body
Mt. SAC 44% 81%San Bernardino
43% 71%
Long Beach 38% 69%Chaffey 37% 66%COD 28% 67%RCC 35% 59%Statewide 33% 56%
MSJC 31% 47%
Palomar 24% 42%MiraCosta 24% 41%
Selected CCC - Diversity*
Employee (FA’07) vs.
Student Body (AY 2007-’08)
*Excludes White & unknown - CCCCMIS Data Element Dictionary Source: CCCCO DataMart - Fall 2007, August 05, 2008 & AY 2007-’08 MSJCD R&P Dept. XCJH9.23.8
3.9%
3.1%2.6%
3.7%
MSJC RCC Palomar CCCStatewide
Source: CCCCO – AY 2007-’08 Data Mart – Student Services Program
MSJC disabled account for 3.9% of the student body (903 students) slightly higher than the CCC state average .
18%
36%
18%
36%
17%
37%
16%
34%
19%
36%
19%
36%
16%
34%
Ws 18% 18% 17% 16% 19% 19% 16%WDFs 36% 36% 37% 34% 36% 36% 34%
FA05 FA06 FA07 FA08 SP06 SP07 SP08
Source: MSJC DSS
MSJC Ws account for 1 out of 6 grades, W,D & Fs account for 1/3
2007 California College-Going Rates* by County
Riverside County’s California College-Going Rate 38% is significantly below the California state average of 48%.
48%
62% 61%55%
38%34%
Calif. Imper. O.C. S.D. River. San Ber.
* Public High Schools Source: California Postsecondary Education Commission - MSJC R&PD 12/4/8
Prior yr. 42% 57% 45% 38% 36%
2007 California College-Going Rateby Unified School District
7 of 8 MSJC feeder H.S. Districts are below state average.
48% 49%40% 39% 38% 38% 35%
27% 27% 25%
Calif.* Tem. Lak. El. Perris Hem. R.County Murr. S.Jac. Ban. Beau.
* State % includes public H.S. only; districts includes public & privateSource: California Postsecondary Education Commission - MSJC R&PD 12/4/8
Prior yr. 45% 28% 26% 20% 38% 33% 12% 34% 37%
MSJC Students % Assessed into DEV
96% 97% 92% 97% 95%
FA06 SP07 FA07 SP08 Weighted Avg.
Total # Assessed into DEV: 2,725 1,650 3,276 1,299
On average, 95% of all 1st time students that were assessed, assess into a DEV courses, ‘below college level’ course (course sections #s < 100)
Source: MSJC- IT MIS DataTel WO# XBRO.BSI.Report
MSJC - Students % Assessed Below College Level
Source: MSJC- IT MIS DataTel WO# XBRO.BSI.Report
The % of students assessing into Developmental Educational (DEV) English & math courses have remained relatively constant … 90% and 95%, respectively
English 98 or below
Math 96 or below
FA06 SP07 FA07 SP08 FA06 SP07 FA07 SP08
87% 88% 89% 89% 93% 94% 93% 95%
MSJC - Students % Assessed Pre-collegiate Basic Skills
1 level below college level
FA06 SP07 FA07 SP08 FA06 SP07 FA07 SP08
38% 34% 34%29% 30%
23%31%
24%
Only 3 out of 10 students assessed in pre-collegiate Basic Skills English & 1 out of 4 into pre-collegiate math
English 98 Math 96
Source: MSJC- IT MIS DataTel WO# XBRO.BSI.Report
MSJC - Students % Assessed Below Pre-collegiate Level
FA06 SP07 FA07 SP08 FA06 SP07 FA07 SP08
49%55% 55%
61% 63%71%
62%71%
Source: MSJC- IT MIS DataTel WO# XBRO.BSI.Report
The majority assess 2 levels below college level
English 62 or below
Math 90 or below
58% 56% 58% 59%
FA06 SP07 FA07 SP08
The DEV course (section <100) success rate is least than 60%
Source: MSJC- IT MIS DataTel WO# XBRO.BSI.Report
All DEV Courses
52% 49% 53% 52%60% 59% 62% 61%
FA06 SP07 FA07 SP08 FA06 SP07 FA07 SP08
The DEV math success rate is slightly above 50% ... 60% for English
Math English
Source: MSJC- IT MIS DataTel WO# XBRO.BSI.Report
F2F success rate is consistently higher than DE
MSJC Success Rate SP’05 SP’06 SP’07 SP’08 FA’04 FA’05 FA’06 FA’07 FA’08
F2F 62 64 64 66 64 64 65 63 65DE 58 60 60 60 58 59 57 54 59
F2F-DE 4 4 4 6 6 5 8 9 6
Source: Data Mart, www.CCCCO.edu 5.18.9
34%
69% 66%
31%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
FA'07 FA'08
FTF Only
1 or more Non-Traditonal Class
MSJC District Enrollment ShareFTF Only vs.
1 or More Non-Traditional Class (Distance ED)
On-Line ... 1 out of 3 students is enrolled in at least 1 Distance Education (DE) class...the % of students enrolled in DE classes increased 10 pts. from SP’07 to SP’09.
% of total enrollment
Source: DataTel :R&PD – XCJH 1.30.9
29% 33%
77% 71% 67%
23%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
SP'07 SP'08 SP'09
MSJC District ActivityFA06 SP07 FA07 SP08 FA08
# Visits 46,333 46,144
50,999
53,230
57,264
Chg. vs. Yr. ago 10% 15% 12%# Hours visited 69,632 74,87
867,83
179,17
589,488
Chg. vs. Yr. ago -3% 6% 32%Headcount Chg. vs. Yr. ago(1)
6% 9% 11%
% Visited unduplicated(1)
SJC (1,400 visits/wk(2)) 37% 32% 31% 33% 36%MVC (2,000 visits/wk(2)) 41% 41% 43% 43% 40%
LRC’s update FA’08…visits district wide up 12%
… & hours visited up 32%
Source: MSJCD MIS DataTel XKN, R&P Dept. XCJH.6.8.9(1) Students on 1st Census day , (2) FA08 duplicated
Over 480 MSJC students transferred to CSU & UC, up 22%
104
380484
UC CSU Total
+ 26%+ 9% + 22%AY 07-’08% Chg. vs. Yr.
Source: Ca. Gov -Postsecondary Education Commission - CPEC Transfer Pathways Charts- CPEC.CA.GOV –MSJC R&P Dept. XCH11.13.08
AY 07-’08 over 480 MSJC students transferred to CSU & UC, up 22%
14 21 26 13 53 70 56 50 46 61 82 72 91 65 81 73 96 95 104
89-'90
90-'91
91-'92
92-'93
93-'94
94-'95
95-'96
96-'97
97-'98
98-'99
99-'00
00-'01
01-'02
02-'03
03-'04
04-'05
05-'06
06-'07
07-'08
78 96 93 97 139 151 157 155 182 191 186 207262 269 250 289 298 302
380
89-'90
90-'91
91-'92
92-'93
93-'94
94-'95
95-'96
96-'97
97-'98
98-'99
99-'00
00-'01
01-'02
02-'03
03-'04
04-'05
05-'06
06-'07
07-'08
92 117 119 110192 221 213 205 228 252 268 279
353 334 331 362 394 397484
89-'90
90-'91
91-'92
92-'93
93-'94
94-'95
95-'96
96-'97
97-'98
98-'99
99-'00
00-'01
01-'02
02-'03
03-'04
04-'05
05-'06
06-'07
07-'08
+ 26%
+ 9%
+ 22%
AY 07-’08% Chg. vs. Yr.
CSU
Total
UC
Source: Ca. Gov -Postsecondary Education Commission - CPEC Transfer Pathways Charts- CPEC.CA.GOV –MSJC R&P Dept. XCH01.07.09
MSJC Programs•Supplemental Instruction (SI)•Workshops•Tutoring•On-Line Tutoring (Smarthinking)•Early Alert•Math 41/42•1 Minute paper•Cooperative Teaching•STEM Grant
MSJC – R&P Dept. – XCHASX 6.5.9
Source: MSJC MVC Math Coordinator – Janice LevasseurCompiled: MSJC R&P Dept. – XCHAS Ext7073 - 2.10.9
Benefits of SI …
• increased course grades• decreased % of withdraws• increased success rates
37
SI Elements:
• Courses – historically difficult courses• SI Leader – passed course with an ‘A’ – paid for attending all classes with current class – does not re-lecture – leads/facilitates discussion – shares study strategies – viewed as a peer• Sessions – ‘ two’ one hour sessions per wk – planned around students• Session – group participation• Participant – attended at least one SI session – attendance is voluntary
Source: MSJC MVC Math Coordinator – Janice LevasseurCompiled: MSJC R&P Dept. – XCHAS Ext7073 - 2.10.9
38
Grade DistributionSI versus Non-SI group
FA’06/SP’07/FA’07/SP’08/FA’08
Successful completions in the SI Group far exceed the Non-SI (40%).
69%
40%
A, B, & C
SI Group Non-SI Group
Success Rate
Source: MSJC MVC Math Coordinator – Janice LevasseurCompiled: MSJC R&P Dept. – XCHAS Ext7073 - 2.10.9
39
Grade Point AverageSI versus Non-SI group
FA’06/SP’07/FA’07/SP’08/FA’08
2.5
1.9
SI Group Non-SI Group
SI participants grade avg. of 2.5 was 0.6 (over 1/2 grade) higher than the Non–SI.
Source: MSJC MVC Math Coordinator – Janice LevasseurCompiled: MSJC R&P Dept. – XCHAS Ext7073 - 2.10.9
Any Questions