MR3 - UB2011-4 MR on Top Five Officials (FINAL)

8/3/2019 MR3 - UB2011-4 MR on Top Five Officials (FINAL)

1/12

MEDIARELEASE(December 13, 2011)

FROM: Prof. Ronald D. Holmes

PresidentPulse Asia, Inc.

RE: Pulse Asias November 2011 Nationwide Survey on

the Performance and Trust Ratings of the

Top Officials of the National Government,

Senate, House of Representatives and Supreme Court

Pulse Asia is pleased to share with you some findings on the Performance and

Trust Ratings of the Top Officials of the National Government, Senate, House of

Representatives and Supreme Court from the November 2011 Ulat ng Bayan national

survey. We request you to assist us in informing the public by disseminating thisinformation.

The survey fieldwork was conducted from November 10 to 23, 2011 using face-to-face interviews. The following developments dominated the headlines: (1) the

Supreme Court's issuance of a temporary restraining order (TRO) on the watch list order

against former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and former First Gentleman Jose

Miguel T. Arroyo; (2) acting on orders of Department of Justice Secretary Leila de Lima,the immigration officials' preventing the former First Couple from leaving the country

despite the SC TRO; (3) the arrest of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo on 18November 2011 on charges of electoral fraud in the May 2007 elections; (4) the murder

of a son of former Senator Ramon Revilla, Sr. and the alleged involvement of family

members in the murder plot; (5) the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)

Summit and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Summit attended by PresidentBenigno S. Aquino III; (6) the visit to the Philippines by U.S. State Secretary Hillary


2/12

2

Clinton and South Korean President Lee Myung-Bak; (7) the Bureau of InternalRevenues (BIR) continued campaign against tax evaders; (8) the commemoration of the

second anniversary of the Maguindanao massacre; (9) the issuance of a hold departure

order against retired Maj. Gen. Jacinto Ligot and his wife following the filing of taxevasion charges against the couple; (10) government financial assistance given to several

rebel groups; (11) the Supreme Court decision mandating the distribution of the lands ofHacienda Luisita to about 6,000 farmer beneficiaries; (12) the passage of the nationalbudget by the Senate and (13) depreciation of the Philippine peso and increase in diesel

prices and power rates. Other developments during this period include Saranggani

Representative Emmanuel D. Pacquiaos controversial win over Mexican boxer Juan

Manuel Marquez, the appointment of Maj. Gen. Emmanuel Bautista as the new chief ofthe Philippine Army and the inclusion of the Palawan Underground River as one of the

provisional winners in the search for the new seven wonders of nature.

As in our previous surveys, this nationwide survey is based on a sample of 1,200

representative adults 18 years old and above. It has a 3% error margin at the 95%

confidence level. Subnational estimates for each of the geographic areas covered in thesurvey (i.e., Metro Manila, the rest of Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao) have a 6% error

margin, also at 95% confidence level. Those interested in further technical details

concerning the survey's questionnaire and sampling design may request Pulse Asia in

writing for fuller details, including copies of the pre-tested questions actually used.

Pulse Asias pool of academic fellows takes full responsibility for the design and

conduct of the survey, as well as for analyses it makes based on the survey data. Inkeeping with our academic nature, no religious, political, economic, or partisan group

influenced any of these processes. Pulse Asia undertakes Ulat ng Bayan surveys on itsown without any party singularly commissioning the research effort.

For any clarification or questions, kindly contact Prof. Ronald D. Holmes, Pulse AsiaPresident at 09189335497 or Dr. Ana Maria Tabunda, Pulse Asia Chief Research Fellow

at 09189436816.


3/12

3

Pulse Asias November 2011 Ulat ng Bayan Survey:

Media Release on the Performance and Trust Ratings of the

Top Officials of the National Government,

Senate, House of Representatives and Supreme Court

13 December 2011

Three of the leading officials of the Philippine national government score majority

approval and trust ratings in November 2011; Vice-President Jejomar C. Binay

once again obtains the highest ratings (both at 83%)

Most Filipinos express appreciation for the performance of President Benigno S.

Aquino III (72%), Vice-President Jejomar C. Binay (83%) and Senate President Juan

Ponce Enrile (60%). In the case of House Speaker Feliciano R. Belmonte, Jr., approval isthe plurality sentiment toward his performance (45%). As for Supreme Court Chief

Justice Renato C. Corona, virtually the same percentages of Filipinos among those aware

of him (77%), express either appreciation for or indecision as regards his performance(38% versus 37%). (Please refer to Table 1).

November 10 - 23, 2011 / Philippines

(Row Percent)

Base: Aware

op National Officials Aware Approve Undecided Disapprove

BENIGNO S. AQUINO III 100 72 19 9

(President)

JEJOMAR C. BINAY 100 83 12 4

(Vice-President)

JUAN PONCE ENRILE 99 60 28 11

(Senate President)

FELICIANO R. BELMONTE, JR. 83 45 36 16

(Speaker of the

House of Representatives)

RENATO C. CORONA 77 38 37 24

(Supreme Court Chief Justice)

Q30-34. Mayroon ako ritong mga pangalan ng ilang mga opisyal ng ating pamahalaan. Pakisabi ninyo ang inyong opinyon tungkol sa pagganap

nila ng kanilang tungkulin nitong huling tatlong buwan. Sa pamamagitan po ng board na ito (SHOW RATING BOARD), kayo ba ay

TALAGANG APROBADO, APROBADO, MAAARING APROBADO AT MAAARING HINDI APROBADO, HINDI APROBADO, o TALAGANG

HINDI APROBADO kay (NAME) sa kanyang pagganap bilang (POSITION) o wala pa kayong nabasa, narinig o napanood na kahit na

ano tungkol sa kanya kahit na kailan?

Notes: (1) % Approve = % Truly Approve plus Approve; % Disapprove = Disapprove plus % Truly Disapprove.

(2) Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding off or to Don't Know and Refuse responses.

AWARENESS & PERFORMANCE RATINGS OF TOP NATIONAL OFFICIALSTable 1

Overall, the highest approval rating is enjoyed by Vice-President Binay (83%)

while the lowest is obtained by Supreme Court Chief Justice Corona (38%). Ambivalenceis most pronounced toward House Speaker Belmonte (36%) and Supreme Court Chief

Justice Corona (37%) and least marked toward Vice-President Binay (12%). With regard

to disapproval, Filipinos are most critical of the performance of Supreme Court Chief


4/12

4

Justice Corona (24%) while single-digit disapproval ratings are recorded by Vice-President Binay (4%) and President Aquino (9%). (Please refer to Table 1).

Across geographic areas and socio-economic classes, President Aquino and Vice-President Binay register majority approval ratings (64% to 82% and 80% to 85%,

respectively). Senate President Enrile also enjoys majority approval ratings in most ofthese sub-groupings (58% to 64%), with Visayas being the exception (50%). HouseSpeaker Belmontes only majority approval ratings are recorded in Classes ABC and E

(both at 53%). Supreme Court Chief Justice Corona posts almost the same approval and

indecision ratings in most sub-groupings (35% to 45% versus 31% to 42%). (Please refer

to Table 2).

able 2PERFORMANCE RATINGS OF TOP NATIONAL OFFICIALS


LOCATION CLASS

BALAPPROVAL RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E

PRES. BENIGNO S. AQUINO III 72 64 70 82 71 65 71 75

VICE-PRES. JEJOMAR C. BINAY 83 80 82 85 83 81 83 83

SEN. PRES. JUAN PONCE ENRILE 60 58 62 50 64 64 60 58

HOUSE SPEAKER FELICIANO R. BELMONTE, JR. 45 48 44 42 49 53 41 53

CHIEF JUSTICE RENATO C. CORONA 38 36 35 39 45 41 35 45

UNDECIDED






DISAPPROVAL






Q30-34. Mayroon ako ritong mga pangalan ng ilang mga opisyal ng ating pamahalaan. Pakisabi ninyo ang inyong opinyon tungkol sa pagganap

nila ng kanilang tungkulin nitong huling tatlong buwan. Sa pamamagitan po ng board na ito (SHOW RATING BOARD), kayo ba ay

TALAGANG APROBADO, APROBADO, MAAARING APROBADO AT MAAARING HINDI APROBADO, HINDI APROBADO, o TALAGANG

HINDI APROBADO kay (NAME) sa kanyang pagganap bilang (POSITION) o wala pa kayong nabasa, narinig o napanood na kahit na

ano tungkol sa kanya kahit na kailan?



(In Percent)

These overall performance ratings do not differ significantly from those recorded

in Pulse Asias August 2011 survey. Only marginal changes in the performance ratings ofthese government officials occur between August and November 2011. Even the 5-

percentage point decline in the approval ratings of President Aquino and Senate PresidentEnrile, the 5-percentage point decrease in the level of indecision toward the work done by

House Speaker Belmonte and the 5-percentage point increase in the disapproval scores of

President Aquino and Supreme Court Chief Justice Corona fall short of being significant

given this surveys overall error margin of +/- 3 percentage points. (Please refer to Table

3).


5/12

5

Few significant changes in the performance ratings of these officials occur

between August and November 2011 across geographic areas and socio-economic

classes. The only notable movements are the: (1) 15-percentage point drop in theapproval rating of Senate President Enrile and the 13-percentage point increase in the

level of indecision as regards his performance recorded among Visayans and (2) 13-percentage point decline in the level of indecision concerning House Speaker Belmonteswork among those in the poorest Class E. (Please refer to Table 3).

able 3

COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE RATINGS OF TOP NATIONAL OFFICIALS

August and November 2011 / Philippines

LOCATION CLASS

BAL

APPROVAL RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E

PRES. BENIGNO S. AQUINO III Nov 11 72 64 70 82 71 65 71 75

Aug 11 77 72 76 80 81 68 74 86VICE-PRES. JEJOMAR C. BINAY Nov 11 83 80 82 85 83 81 83 83

Aug 11 85 85 85 80 90 78 84 90

SEN. PRES. JUAN PONCE ENRILE Nov 11 60 58 62 50 64 64 60 58

Aug 11 65 70 59 65 72 64 63 69

HOUSE SPEAKER FELICIANO R. BELMONTE, JR. Nov 11 45 48 44 42 49 53 41 53

Aug 11 45 57 41 43 45 51 43 45

CHIEF JUSTICE RENATO C. CORONA Nov 11 38 36 35 39 45 41 35 45

Aug 11 37 31 34 44 42 36 36 40

UNDECIDED


Aug 11 18 23 19 18 14 25 20 12

VICE-PRES. JEJOMAR C. BINAY Nov 11 12 14 12 13 12 14 12 13

Aug 11 12 12 12 15 7 20 12 8SEN. PRES. JUAN PONCE ENRILE Nov 11 28 27 27 36 25 26 29 28

Aug 11 26 21 32 23 19 27 28 23


Aug 11 41 32 45 38 42 37 41 44


Aug 11 41 48 44 32 40 40 41 43

DISAPPROVAL


Aug 11 4 5 5 2 5 7 5 1


Aug 11 3 3 2 5 2 1 4 1


Aug 11 9 8 8 12 8 9 9 8


Aug 11 13 10 13 16 12 9 15 8


Aug 11 19 20 20 20 15 20 20 15

Q. Mayroon ako ritong mga pangalan ng ilang mga opisyal ng ating pamahalaan. Pakisabi ninyo ang inyong opinyon tungkol sa pagganap nila ng kanilang

tungkulin nitong huling tatlong buwan. Sa pamamagitan po ng board na ito (SHOW RATING BOARD), kayo ba ay TALAGANG APROBADO,

APROBADO, MAAARING APROBADO AT MAAARING HINDI APROBADO, HINDI APROBADO, o TALAGANG HINDI APROBADO kay (NAME)

sa kanyang pagganap bilang (POSITION) o wala pa kayong nabasa o narinig na kahit na ano tungkol sa kanya kahit na kailan?



(In Percent)


6/12

6

As regards trustworthiness, 83% of Filipinos express trust in Vice-President

Binay. President Aquino enjoys the trust of 74% of Filipinos while 59% say they trust

Senate President Enrile. House Speaker Belmonte registers essentially the same trust andindecision ratings (41% versus 40%) while Supreme Court Chief Justice Corona records

a big plurality indecision rating (43%). (Please refer to Table 4).

Table 4

AWARENESS & TRUST RATINGS OF TOP NATIONAL OFFICIALSNovember 10 - 23, 2011 / Philippines

(Row Percent)

Base: Aware

Big Small /

op National Officials Aware Trust Undecided No trust

BENIGNO S. AQUINO III 100 74 17 9

(President)

JEJOMAR C. BINAY 100 83 13 3

(Vice-President)

JUAN PONCE ENRILE 99 59 30 10

(Senate President)

FELICIANO R. BELMONTE, JR. 83 41 40 19

(Speaker of the

House of Representatives)

RENATO C. CORONA 77 29 43 27

(Supreme Court Chief Justice)

Q69-73. NAIS SANA NAMING TANUNGIN KAYO TUNGKOL SA PAGTITIWALA NINYO SA ILANG MGA TAO AT INSTITUSYON SA ATING LIPUNAN.

Sa pamamagitan po ng board na ito (SHOW RATING BOARD), maaari bang pakisabi ninyo kung gaano kalaki o kaliit ang inyong pagtitiwala

kay/sa [PERSONALITY/INSTITUTION]? Masasabi ba ninyo na ito ay MALAKING-MALAKI, MALAKI, MAAARING MALAKI AT MAAARING

MALIIT, MALIIT, o MALIIT NA MALIIT/WALA?

Notes: (1) % Big Trust = % Very Big Trust plus % Big Trust ; % Small Trust = % Small Trust plus Very Small Trust

(2) *Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding off.

In general, trust is most manifest toward Vice-President Binay (83%) while thelowest trust rating is obtained by Supreme Court Chief Justice Corona (29%).

Ambivalence is most pronounced toward House Speaker Belmonte (40%) and Supreme

Court Chief Justice Corona (43%) and least marked toward Vice-President Binay (13%)and President Aquino (17%). While 27% of Filipinos distrust the Supreme Court Chief

Justice, less than one in ten Filipinos distrusts Vice-President Binay (3%) and President

Aquino (9%). (Please refer to Table 4).

Three of these leading government officials register majority trust ratings across

geographic areas and socio-economic classes President Aquino (68% to 87%), Vice-President Binay (78% to 91%) and Senate President Enrile (54% to 63%). House SpeakerBelmontes only majority trust rating is given by those in Class ABC (51%) while he

posts plurality indecision ratings in the rest of Luzon, Mindanao and Class D (40% to

41%). Indecision is the plurality sentiment toward Supreme Court Chief Justice Coronain most of these sub-groupings (42% to 46%). (Please refer to Table 5).


7/12

7

able 5

RUST RATINGS OF TOP NATIONAL OFFICIALS


LOCATION CLASS

BAL

TRUST RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D EPRES. BENIGNO S. AQUINO III 74 69 71 87 70 68 73 76





UNDECIDED






DISTRUST






Q69-73. NAIS SANA NAMING TANUNGIN KAYO TUNGKOL SA PAGTITIWALA NINYO SA ILANG MGA TAO AT INSTITUSYON SA ATING LIPUNAN.






(In Percent)

Between August and November 2011, the most marked movement in the overall

trust ratings of these government officials is the 6-percentage point rise in the distrust

rating of Supreme Court Chief Justice Corona. Across geographic areas, PresidentAquino and Vice-President Binay enjoy improvements in their trust ratings in the Visayas

(both at +13 percentage points) while Senate President Enrile experiences a decline in his

trust rating in Metro Manila (-14 percentage points). Across socio-economic classes, the

only significant change is the drop in the level of ambivalence toward House SpeakerBelmontes trustworthiness recorded in Class E (-13 percentage points). (Please refer to

Table 6).


8/12

8

able 6

COMPARATIVE TRUST RATINGS OF TOP NATIONAL OFFICIALS

August and November 2011 / Philippines

LOCATION CLASS

BAL

TRUST RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D EPRES. BENIGNO S. AQUINO III Nov 11 74 69 71 87 70 68 73 76

Aug 11 75 74 73 74 82 64 74 82


Aug 11 86 85 88 78 89 76 85 91


Aug 11 59 70 50 62 67 57 59 61


Aug 11 41 55 36 37 44 47 40 40


Aug 11 31 29 27 33 37 27 31 33

UNDECIDED


Aug 11 19 21 21 21 13 25 20 16


Aug 11 11 11 10 18 8 19 11 8


Aug 11 31 22 38 26 25 31 30 31


Aug 11 43 36 45 46 44 40 41 48


Aug 11 45 48 46 41 44 47 44 46

DISTRUST


Aug 11 5 5 6 5 5 11 6 2

VICE-PRES. JEJOMAR C. BINAY Nov 11 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 4Aug 11 3 3 3 4 3 5 4 1


Aug 11 10 7 12 12 8 12 11 9


Aug 11 15 9 19 13 11 10 18 10


Aug 11 21 22 24 22 16 19 23 19

Q. NAIS SANA NAMING TANUNGIN KAYO TUNGKOL SA PAGTITIWALA NINYO SA ILANG MGA TAO AT INSTITUSYON SA ATING LIPUNAN.

Sa pamamagitan po ng board na ito (SHOW RATING BOARD ), maaari bang pakisabi ninyo kung gaano kalaki o kaliit ang inyong pagtitiwala





(In Percent)


9/12

9

Most Filipinos approve of and trust the Senate (52% and 51%, respectively) and

Supreme Court (52% and 53%, respectively); a big plurality of Filipinos (45%)

appreciates the work done by the House of Representatives while almost the same

percentages express either trust or indecision regarding the trustworthiness of the

Lower House (45% versus 42%)

A small majority of Filipinos (52%) approves of the performance of the Senateand Supreme Court while approval is the plurality sentiment toward the work done by the

House of Representatives (45%). Almost the same percentages of Filipinos express either

indecision or disapproval for the performance of these three institutions (28% to 35% and

17% to 19%, respectively). (Please refer to Table 7).

Table 7PERFORMANCE RATINGS OF THE SENATE,

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SUPREME COURTNovember 10 - 23, 2011 / Philippines

LOCATION CLASS

BAL


SENATE 52 45 55 54 49 54 50 56

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 45 42 43 47 49 43 44 50

SUPREME COURT 52 46 50 56 57 43 51 57

UNDECIDED

SENATE 31 35 29 24 37 32 32 28


SUPREME COURT 28 29 31 23 28 36 28 27

DISAPPROVAL

SENATE 17 20 16 20 13 13 18 15


SUPREME COURT 19 24 19 19 15 21 20 16

Q14-16. Mayroon ako ritong mga pangalan ng mga ahensiya o opisina. Pakisabi ninyo ang inyong opinyon tungkol sa pagganap nila ng kanilang tungkulin.

Sa pamamagitan po ng board na ito (SHOW RATING BOARD), kayo ba ay TALAGANG APROBADO, APROBADO, MAAARING APROBADO AT MAAARING

HINDI APROBADO, HINDI APROBADO, o TALAGANG HINDI APROBADO sa kanilang pagganap sa mga tungkulin ng (AHENSIYA/ OPISINA) o wala pa

kayong nabasa, narinig o napanood na kahit na ano tungkol sa kanila kahit na kailan?

Notes: (1) % Approve = % Truly Approve plus % Approve; % Disapprove = % Disapprove plus % Truly Disapprove.


(In Percent)

The Senate registers majority approval ratings in the rest of Luzon and Visayas

(54% to 55%) and Classes ABC and E (54% to 56%). In the case of the Supreme Court,most of those in the Visayas and Mindanao (56% to 57%) and Classes D and E (51% to

57%) appreciate its performance. Meanwhile, approval is the plurality sentiment in theVisayas and Mindanao (47% to 49%) and Class E (50%) regarding the performance ofthe House of Representatives. (Please refer to Table 7).

The overall disapproval rating of the Senate increases significantly between

August and November 2011 (+7 percentage points). In contrast, the national disapprovalscores of the House of Representatives and Supreme Court increase marginally during

this period (+5 and +6 percentage points, respectively). Across geographic areas and


10/12

10

socio-economic groupings, the only significantly change is the 13-percentage point dropin the approval rating of the Senate in Metro Manila. (Please refer to Table 8).

Table 8

COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE RATINGS OF THE SENATE,

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SUPREME COURTAugust and November 2011 / Philippines

LOCATION CLASS

BAL


SENATE Nov 11 52 45 55 54 49 54 50 56

Aug 11 55 58 52 59 58 50 54 59

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Nov 11 45 42 43 47 49 43 44 50

Aug 11 48 45 43 54 55 45 48 50

SUPREME COURT Nov 11 52 46 50 56 57 43 51 57

Aug 11 55 48 53 61 60 49 55 59

UNDECIDED

SENATE Nov 11 31 35 29 24 37 32 32 28

Aug 11 34 30 38 28 35 41 35 31


Aug 11 38 37 42 31 36 42 36 39


Aug 11 32 35 35 27 26 40 32 27

DISAPPROVAL

SENATE Nov 11 17 20 16 20 13 13 18 15

Aug 11 10 12 10 14 6 10 11 9


Aug 11 14 17 15 16 8 14 15 11


Aug 11 13 17 12 12 14 11 13 13

Q. Mayroon ako ritong mga pangalan ng mga ahensiya o opisina. Pakisabi ninyo ang inyong opinyon tungkol sa pagganap nila ng kanilang tungkulin.

Sa pamamagitan po ng board na ito (SHOW RATING BOARD), kayo ba ay TALAGANG APROBADO, APROBADO, MAAARING APROBADO AT MAAARING

HINDI APROBADO, HINDI APROBADO, o TALAGANG HINDI APROBADO sa kanilang pagganap sa mga tungkulin ng (AHENSIYA/ OPISINA) o wala pa

kayong nabasa, narinig o napanood na kahit na ano tungkol sa kanila kahit na kailan?



(In Percent)

Also in November 2011, while the Senate and Supreme Court register majority

trust ratings (51% and 52%, respectively), the House of Representatives records basically

the same trust and indecision ratings (45% versus 42%). All these institutions obtainalmost identical distrust ratings (12% to 15%). Levels of indecision on the matter of

trusting or distrusting these institutions vary from 33% for the Supreme Court to 42% for

the Lower House. (Please refer to Table 9).


11/12

11

Table 9TRUST RATINGS OF THE SENATE,

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SUPREME COURTNovember 10 - 23, 2011 / Philippines

LOCATION CLASS

BAL

TRUST RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E

SENATE 51 47 49 56 53 59 49 54


SUPREME COURT 53 49 51 54 57 51 50 59

UNDECIDED

SENATE 37 40 39 30 37 33 37 36


SUPREME COURT 33 35 34 29 32 38 32 33

DISTRUST

SENATE 12 14 12 14 9 7 14 10HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 13 16 13 14 10 6 14 13

SUPREME COURT 15 16 16 17 11 11 18 8

Q88-90. NAIS SANA NAMING TANUNGIN KAYO TUNGKOL SA PAGTITIWALA NINYO SA ILANG MGA TAO, AHENSIYA AT GRUPO SA ATING LIPUNAN.


kay/sa [PERSONALITY/AGENCY/GROUP] ? Masasabi ba ninyo na ito ay MALAKING-MALAKI, MALAKI, MAAARING MALAKI AT MAAARING




(In Percent)

Majority trust ratings are scored by the Senate in the Visayas and Mindanao (53%

to 56%) and Classes ABC and E (54% to 59%) while the only majority trust rating of the

House of Representatives is posted in Class ABC (52%). The Lower House obtains

almost the same trust and indecision ratings in the other sub-groupings (38% to 49%versus 40% to 46%) and socio-economic groupings (43% to 46% versus 41% to 43%).

As for the Supreme Court, it enjoys the trust of most of those in the rest of Luzon,

Visayas and Mindanao (51% to 57%) and Classes ABC and E (51% to 59%).

Filipinos assessment of the trustworthiness of these three institutions remains

generally unchanged between August and November 2011 both at the national level

and across geographic areas and socio-economic classes. (Please refer to Table 10).


12/12

12

Table 10

COMPARATIVE TRUST RATINGS OF THE SENATE,

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SUPREME COURTAugust and November 2011 / Philippines

LOCATION CLASSBAL

TRUST RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E

SENATE Nov 11 51 47 49 56 53 59 49 54

Aug 11 53 54 48 56 58 51 51 58


Aug 11 47 43 40 53 55 45 45 51


Aug 11 54 51 49 65 59 48 54 58

UNDECIDED

SENATE Nov 11 37 40 39 30 37 33 37 36

Aug 11 39 36 44 35 34 40 41 34


Aug 11 41 42 45 36 37 42 41 40


Aug 11 33 37 40 22 29 40 35 29

DISTRUST

SENATE Nov 11 12 14 12 14 9 7 14 10

Aug 11 8 10 7 9 8 9 8 9


Aug 11 12 14 15 11 8 13 14 9


Aug 11 12 12 12 13 12 12 12 13

Q. NAIS SANA NAMING TANUNGIN KAYO TUNGKOL SA PAGTITIWALA NINYO SA ILANG MGA TAO, AHENSIYA AT GRUPO SA ATING LIPUNAN.


kay/sa [PERSONALITY/AGENCY/GROUP]? Masasabi ba ninyo na ito ay MALAKING-MALAKI, MALAKI, MAAARING MALAKI AT MAAARING




(In Percent)

Documents

MR3 - UB2011-4 MR on Top Five Officials (FINAL)