Upload
brent-barnett
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Motivation, Management, Supervision, Development
and Diversity
Professor Walter C. Farrell, JrAnd
2011 Class Members
Why Motivation MattersMust select, develop and retain workforce to carry out mission
Human services have limited extrinsic motivators
Outcomes better for staff and clients
Theoretical ApproachesIndividual
◦Relevant personality traits and needs
Interpersonal◦Interactions between employee and other individuals in environment
Organizational◦Structure, culture and organizational policies
Individual ApproachesNEEDS THEORY: Satisfying higher-level needs leads to improved work performance and growth
REINFORCEMENT: Patterns of reinforcement motivate work performance
SELF-EFFICACY: Perception of ability to perform motivates work performance
Interaction ApproachesATTRIBUTION THEORY: Explanations of causes of behaviors motivates behavior
JUSTICE THEORIES: Perceptions of fairness in organizations affects motivation
Organizational ApproachesQUALITY OF WORKING LIFE: Overall job satisfaction motivates performance
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT: Organizational commitment to continuous improvement and teamwork motivate performance
Conservation of ResourcesIntegrative approach
Used to understand the process of stress and burnout in organizational settings
Stress occurs when there is a loss of resources◦Resource loss and gain happens in cycle
◦Loss cycles are more salient and rapid
Accumulated stress leads to burnout
Human Resource Management Recruitment and screening for personnel
◦ Recruitment generating applicant pool for employer to make a selection that satisfies needs of organization
Locating avenues to reach promising applicants (Idealist, Craigslist, Monster.com, community centers, newspapers, employment agencies)
◦ Selection reviewing job applicants to decide who is offered a position Selection committee, CEO, Advisory
Board, Management Team
Human Resource ManagementOrientation is crucial to introduce
new workers to the organization (policies, procedures, colleagues, roles and responsibilities, and authority structure)
◦Relate the mission, vision, goals, and objectives of the agency and provide information about department’s role and scope
Human Resource Management Supervising--helping staff set priorities,
establishing goals, working with diverse staff, monitoring employee performance, providing supportive and education-oriented guidance
◦ Continuous and ongoing◦ Weekly or monthly
Evaluation--measurement of the extent a worker has achieved the requirements of position within the team
◦ Should be continuous, not one-time or occasional
◦ Yearly, quarterly, monthly
Human Resource ManagementHandling Employee Performance
Problems◦“Performance problems” are viewed as evidence of lack or worker knowledge or skill, poor attitude, need for more supervision, or poor use of time
◦Handling performance problems 1) Counseling and/or training, 2) written
reprimands, 3) Final warning and a probationary period, and 4) dismissal
Supervision and DevelopmentRelationship between
employee/volunteer and immediate supervisor is most important relationship
Belief that nothing is greater threat to retention than salaries
Must provide staff the opportunity to develop personally
Elements of Effective Supervision Emotional support
Work support
Clear expectations
Fair and consistent feedback
Communicate information
Instruction
Creating a culture that supports workers
Building a learning and performance oriented culture
Training vs. DevelopmentTRAINING provides knowledge and skills to be used in current job
DEVELOPMENT contributes to overall growth of employees and prepares for future opportunities
Roles of a SupervisorTeacher/Coach
Mentor
Evaluator
Leader
Learner
Examples of Development Activities
Orientation
Conferences
Staff meetings
Brown-bag lunch discussions and Journal clubs
Job rotations and Shadowing
Group supervision
Individual career counseling
Continuing education at universities
Diversity in Human Service Organizations
Human service organizations traditionally serve communities with a high concentration of diverse, disadvantaged, and oppressed groups
A 2011 National Association of Social Workers study indicated >87% of licensed social workers are predominately non-Hispanic whites◦ 90% reported having Blacks/African Americans on caseloads
◦ 80% reported having Hispanics/Latinos on caseloads
This workforce data highlight drastic contrast in diversity among personnel and clients served in human service organizations
Social and Psychological Aspects of Diversity • Despite progress to increase representation of
diverse groups in the workforce, the exclusion of these groups from circles of influence limits contribution and involvement in workplace
• Workforce Diversity- the division into distinction categories that (a) Perceived commonality within a given cultural or
national context(b) Potentially harmful or beneficial employment
outcomes
• Inclusion-Exclusion Continuum– Individual’s sense of being a part of the
organizational system in both formal and informal processes
Theories of Diversity and Intergroup Relations
• REALISTIC CONFLICT THEORY (RCT)--People act in self-interest causing their drive to maximize own rewards to the detriment of others
• EQUITY THEORY---People strive for justice and view perceptions of injustice as the cause of personal distress and intergroup conflict
• RELATIVE DEPRIVATION THEORY---Perceptions of injustice are the cause of personal distress and intergroup conflict
• SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY---Social structures and individual identity are connected through the meanings people attach to their membership in identity groups (formed by race, ethnicity, or gender)
Managing for Diversity and Empowerment • Theory and research indicates people are motivated to seek social
inclusion and avoid exclusion . There are Four paths to address social exclusion
1. Individual change---Individual members of a group disassociating themselves psychologically and behaviorally from their low-status group
2. Group change---Groups redefine or alter elements of values/attributes to seek positive status for the group as a whole
3. Organizational change---Organizations implement policies and remove barriers to advancement and promotion of members of disadvantaged groups
4. Societal Change ---Society as a whole can create social mobility of disadvantaged groups through legislation and public policies
The Bill Walsh Case◦Bill Walsh is the late Coach of the San Francisco 49ers NFL football team, who led the team to three Super Bowl titles, 1982,1985, and 1989
◦He was hired in 1979 to rebuild a team with a 2-14 record in 1978-79, that had never won a Super Bowl
◦He rebuilt the team from the bottom up, starting in the Spring of 1979
The Bill Walsh Case◦FIRST, he met with the Owner to
secure the title of General Manager to go along with his Coach title so that he had full authority over all personnel, after the Owner, and secured the Owner’s commitment that he would not undercut him
◦SECOND, he met with the football field groundskeepers, custodians, secretaries, football scouts, stadium workers, etc. individually to outline his long-term vision for the organization and to solicit their input and support
The Bill Walsh Case◦THIRD, he reviewed players’ performance, behavior, and “effort “records to determine who should keep and let go
◦FOURTH, he reviewed existing staff’s past performance and kept those who bought into his vision for the organization
◦FIFTH, he hired new staff to fit his vision
◦SIXTH, he then managed and led the organization to new heights
The Bill Walsh Case◦Seventh, In 1987, after winning two
Super Bowls titles, he used his “professional capital” to establish a “Minority Coaches Fellowship Program” to broaden inclusiveness in the NFL
◦Eighth, by 2012, Walsh or his coaching progeny had won 13 (39%) of the 33 Super Bowls played since 1980.
◦Of the 66 Coaches who participated in the 33 Super Bowls (2 per Year), the only four minority (African American) coaches are from the “Walsh Family Tree”
The Bill Walsh Case◦ADDENDUM
Also see F-12 ACCOUNTABILITY on the class website (Ricks, Thomas E., “Whatever Happened to Accountability,” Harvard Business Review, October 2012, pp.93-1000