4
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Province of Surigao del Norte City/unici!ality of Surigao UNICIP" L TRI"L COURT Branc# $%& City of Surigao Hercule' Ra(ire)& Plaintiff, CI*IL C"SE No+ %,-.0 1ver'u'1 FOR 2 SU OF ONE3 Cu!id Hedalgo& Defendant, 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 MOTION TO DISMISS 5EFEN5"NT& 6y coun'el& re'!ectfully (ove' to di'(i'' t#e Co(!laint on t#e gr ound t#at t#e Co(!laint F"ILS TO ST"TE " C"USE OF "CTION a' THE OBLI7"TION SOU7HT TO BE ENFORCE5 B3 PL"INTIFF IS NOT 3ET 5UE "N5 5E"N5"BLE+ In 'tr engt# ening of t#e for egoi ng gr ound& 5efen da nt re'!ectfully 'u6(it' t#e follo8ing2  "rgu(en t %+ "llegedly& defendant #a' failed to !ay under t#e Pro(i''ory Note dated 9anuary %0& ,$%+ Plaintiff no8 'ee:' to collect t#e 'u( of One Hundred T#ou'and !e'o' ;P%$$&$$$+$$<& re!re'enting t#e a(ount under t#e 'aid Pro(i''ory Note+ ,+ T#e Pro(i''ory Note i' due and de(anda6le on t8o ;,< (ont#' after it' e4ecution= t#e !eriod of t8o ;,< (ont#' #a' not yet reac#ed Con'e>u ent ly !lainti ff? ' clai( i' !re(ature a'

Motion to Dismiss

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

sample

Citation preview

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of Surigao del Norte

City/Municipality of Surigao

MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTBranch 01, City of SurigaoHercules Ramirez,

Plaintiff,

CIVIL CASE No. 123456

-versus-

FOR : SUM OF MONEY

Cupid Hedalgo,

Defendant,

x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xMOTION TO DISMISSDEFENDANT, by counsel, respectfully moves to dismiss the Complaint on the ground that the Complaint FAILS TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION as THE OBLIGATION SOUGHT TO BE ENFORCED BY PLAINTIFF IS NOT YET DUE AND DEMANDABLE.In strengthening of the foregoing ground, Defendant respectfully submits the following:

Argument1. Allegedly, defendant has failed to pay under the Promissory Note dated January 16, 2015. Plaintiff now seeks to collect the sum of One Hundred Thousand pesos (P100,000.00), representing the amount under the said Promissory Note.2. The Promissory Note is due and demandable on two (2) months after its execution; the period of two (2) months has not yet reached. Consequently, plaintiffs claim is premature as there is yet no breach of the contract until the period indicated has lapsed. For this reason, plaintiffs Complaint states no cause of action and must be dismissed.

WHEREFORE, defendant respectfully prays that the Complaint be DISMISSED for failure to state a cause of action.

Other just and equitable reliefs are also prayed for.

Surigao City, Surigao del Norte, February 7, 2015ANALEE ALVERASTINECounsel for Defendant3rd floor, Yuipco Bldg.

Borromeo Street, Surigao City

Attorneys Roll no. 12345

IBP No.23456-01/08/11-Surigao

PTR No. 45678-01/08/11-SurigaoMCLE Compliance No.II-0008776-Nov 18, 2013REQUEST FOR AND NOTICE OF HEARING

The Branch Clerk of Court

Municipal Trial Court

Branch 1, City of Surigao

Please submit the foregoing Motion to the Court for its consideration and approval immediately upon receipt hereof and kindly include the same in the courts calendar for hearing on February 16, 2015 at 8:30 in the morning.

Analee S. Alverastine

Counsel for Defendant

Atty. Sean Darwina

Counsel for Plaintiff

1424 Rizal Street

Surigao City

Please take notice that counsel has requested to be heard on February 16, 2015 at 8:30 in the morning.

ANALEE ALVERASTINE

Counsel for Defendant

3rd floor, Yuipco Bldg.

Borromeo Street, Surigao City

Copy furnished through personal service:Atty. Sean Darwina

Counsel for Plaintiff

1424 Rizal Street

Surigao City