Upload
kelsi-sill
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Morteza MozaffariSoil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna
Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas
Highlights of Research in Progress
Acknowledgement
Research was funded by Arkansas Corn and
Grain Sorghum Promotion Board
Presentation outline
• Backgrounds Information
• Presidedress soil nitrate test (PSNT)
• Using chlorophyll meters
Mississippi Delta Region of Arkansas (MDRA)
MS River Delta Region of Arkansas
• Soils: predominantly alluvial
• Topography: relatively flat land
• One of the oldest row crop production regions
Corn Production in Arkansas
0
200
400
600
800
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
YEAR
Acr
es
Pla
nte
d X
10
00
Urea Price
$295
$670
$395
0
200
400
600
800
03 07 08
YEAR
$ /
To
n
Current AR corn N fertility recommendations
Yield Goal Silt and sandy loams
Clay loam and clay soil
- bu/acre - ---------------- lb N /acre ---------------------
125 150 230
150 185 280
175 220 330
> 200 255 330
Long-term sustainability of corn production
Protect water quality
Profit margin
Presentation outline
• Backgrounds Information
• Presidedress soil nitrate test (PSNT)
• Using a chlorophyll meter
The PSNT idea
• Apply a small amount of N (30-40 lb/acre) at planting
• Collect a soil sample from 0-12” depth at 6-8-leaf stage
• Use the PSNT result as a guide to identify and apply the optimum N rate
Objectives
For irrigated corn production in MRDRA
• Evaluate the effect of sidedress N-fertilizer rate on corn grain yield
• Assess the suitability of PSNT for improving corn N fertility management
Research Approach • 21 replicated field experiments– Production fields and AES sites across the MRDRA – 04-07
• Experimental Design: – Randomized complete block with 4-5 replications – Five or six N rates
• Total N rates: 0-300 lb N/acre – Year 1 and 2: 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 300 lb N/acre
– Year 3: 0, 60, 120, 180, 240 300 lb N/acre
• Cultural Practices:– AES Sites: Cooperative Extension Service recommendations– Commercial sites: Growers’ Practices
Nitrogen fertilizer application schedule
Total N rate Pre-plant At 6-8 leaf
-------------------------- lb N /acre -----------------------
0 0 0
60 30 30
120 30 90
180 30 150
240 30 210
300 30 270
• Important dates:– planted: 17 March to 4 June– sidedress N date: 4 May to 6 June (6-8 leaf stage)– harvest: 10 Aug to Sep 18
• Soil sampling and analysis:– pre plant, top 6”, six cores/replication
– measured NO3-N, pH, texture, Mehlich-3 nutrients
– PSNT samples 6-8 leaf (before 2nd N application)– zero to 12’’, six cores, 0 N plots
– measured NO3-N by ISE
Research Approach
• Analysis of Variance:– to evaluate the effect of N rate on grain yield– sites were analyzed separately
• Calculated Relative Yield as:– (check plot yield/highest plot yield) X 100
Data Analysis
Results and Discussion
Properties of soil samples collected from the 0-6” depth before planting
Range Soil pH NO3-N SOM Sand Silt Clay Soil texture
-- ppm ----------------------- % ---------------------
Min. 5.6 3 1.2 2 21 13 sandy loam
Max. 7.5 85 3.2 57 74 57 clay
Summary of the Results • PSNT (mg/kg):
• 4-36: all sites • 4-10: 12 sites • 10-20: 5 sites• > 20: 4 sites
• Grain yield:– Significant N response: 20 sites, P≤0.0003
– Zero N treatments: 9-192 (bu/acre)– Highest N rate: 140-223 (bu/acre)– State average: 131-146 (bu/acre)
• Agronomic Optimum N rate: – 150-250 (lb/acre)
Correlation between PSNT and relative yield of the check plot (All 21 sites)
y = 1.95x + 20.2
R2 = 0.53, P=0.0003
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40
PSNT (ppm)
Rel
ativ
e yi
eld
(%)
Correlation between PSNT and relative yield of the check plot (sandy loam and silt loam sites, 16 sites)
PSNT (ppm)
Rel
ativ
e yi
eld
(%)
y = 2.06x + 21.4
R2 = 0.62, P=0.0003
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40
Conclusions of PSNT Study In irrigated corn production in MRDRA
• Sidedress application of N significantly increased corn grain yield in 20 of the 21 sites
• Agronomic Optimum N rate was 150-250 lb/acre
• Presidedress soil nitrate test shows great promise for improving corn N fertility management
Presentation outline
• Backgrounds Information
• Presidedress soil nitrate test
• Using a chlorophyll meter
Basic Idea• Establish a well fertilized N reference strip in your field
• Collect chlorophyll meter reading from plants in area you may want to fertilize
• Collect chlorophyll meter reading from your reference strip
• Calculate relative chlorophyll meter value (RCM)
CM reading from are you want to fertilize RCM = CM reading from the reference area
34.6 RCM =
58.0 = 0.59
Research Approach
• 5 replicated field experiments– Production fields and AES sites across the MRDRA – 07
• Experimental Design: – Randomized complete block with 4-5 replications
• N fertilizer management:– Five N rates 0, 60, 120, 180, 240 300 lb N/acre
– Split N application: preplant and four leaf stage
• Cultural Practices:– AES Sites: Cooperative Extension Service recommendations– Commercial sites: Growers’ Practices
•
• Important dates:– planted: 4 April to May 5– harvest: 15 Aug to Sep 17
• Soil sampling and analysis:– pre plant, top 6”, six cores/replication
– measured NO3-N, pH, texture, Mehlich-3 nutrients
• Leaf and CM data collection:– 9-12 leaf stage
Research Approach
• Analysis of Variance:– to evaluate the effect of N rate on grain yield, leaf N,
and CM– sites were analyzed separately
• Calculated Relative Yield and Relative CM
Data Analysis
Results and Discussion
Properties of soil samples collected from the 0-6” depth before planting
Range Soil pH NO3-N SOM Sand Silt Clay Soil texture
-- ppm ----------------------- % ---------------------
Min. 5.6 10 1.1 2 12 11 sandy loam
Max. 7.5 53 2.9 75 72 39silty clay
loam
Summary of the Results • Grain yield:
– Significant N response: all sites, P≤0.0044
– Zero N treatments: 31-178 (bu/acre)
– Highest N rate: 131-233 (bu/acre)
– State average: 148 (bu/acre)
Correlation between RCM and relative yield at five sites
PSNT (ppm)
Rel
ativ
e yi
eld
(%)
y = 2.01x - 1.07
r2 = 0.77, P=0.001
0.00
0.40
0.80
1.20
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1
Concluding Remarks• PSNT and CM are promising tools for Improving N
use efficiency in Arkansas
• Additional work is underway