SECTOR COMMENT

U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE MARCH 12, 2014

Table of Contents:

LOWER REIMBURSEMENT WILL LOWER PROFIT DUE TO FIXED COST STRUCTURE 2 TWO-MIDNIGHT RULE WILL ACCELERATE TREND OF INPATIENT CARE SHIFTING TO OUTPATIENT 2 HOSPITALS WITH SHORT LENGTHS OF STAY MOST AFFECTED 2 LOWER REVENUE WILL AFFECT ALL HOSPITALS WITH HIGH PROPORTION OF INPATIENT CARE 3 SMALL HOSPITALS LACK ADEQUATE STAFF TO ADAPT TO NEW RULE 3 FEWER RAC CLAIMS PROVIDE A SILVER LINING 4 MOODY’S RELATED RESEARCH 5

Analyst Contacts:

SAN FRANCISCO +1.415.274.1708

Daniel Steingart, CFA +1.949.429.5355 Assistant Vice President - Analyst daniel.steingart@moodys.com

NEW YORK +1.212.553.1653

Lisa Martin +1.212.553.1423 Senior Vice President lisa.martin@moodys.com

Kendra M. Smith +1.212.553.4807 Managing Director - Public Finance kendra.smith@moodys.com

Two-Midnight Rule Will Reduce Revenue for Most Hospitals

Effective October 2013, the “two-midnight rule” for acute care hospitals classifies most hospital visits under 48 hours as outpatient cases. Previously, inpatient status was largely determined by medical necessity. We expect the rule change will weaken hospital operating profitability in calendar year 2014 because it will lower Medicare reimbursement for these cases. Although the rule change will affect all acute care hospitals, the impact will not be uniform across the not-for-profit hospital sector.

Key observations:

» Reimbursement difference between inpatient and outpatient cases will decrease profits: On average, the rule could cause revenue reduction averaging $3,000 to $4,000 per case.

» Two-midnight rule will accelerate trend of inpatient care shifting to outpatient: The rule will result in significant growth in observation stays in 2014, pressuring hospital revenues.

» Hospitals with short lengths of stay will be most affected: Smaller community hospitals with low average lengths of stay and less complex cases are most at risk.

» Reimbursement change will impact hospitals with high proportion of inpatient care: Profitability will suffer as the high fixed costs of inpatient care are spread over a smaller base of inpatients.

» Small hospitals lack adequate staff to adapt to new rule: More resources are needed to implement administrative and operating changes caused by the rule.

» Fewer RAC claims provide a silver lining: The rule could reduce recovery auditor contractor (RAC) reviews of hospital admissions practices, offering some financial relief.

Over the next two years, we expect hospitals to adapt by adjusting care protocols for the most frequent diagnoses impacted by the rule, and by opening dedicated units to treat these patients. Over the last few years, some hospitals have opened lower-cost, separate observation units to care for patients that don’t meet the qualifications for inpatient admission but require treatment. This has the potential to lower costs for certain groups of patients.

U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

2 MARCH 12, 2014

SECTOR COMMENT: TWO-MIDNIGHT RULE WILL REDUCE REVENUE FOR MOST HOSPITALS

Lower Reimbursement Will Lower Profit Due to Fixed Cost Structure

We expect the rule change to negatively impact financial performance for most hospitals during calendar year 2014. The reimbursement differential between an inpatient admission and outpatient case varies according to a variety of factors. On average, inpatient cases are reimbursed at a far higher rate -- two to three times higher -- than outpatient cases. The rule could decrease revenues on average by $3,000 to $4,000 per case.

However, the cost of treating these patients will initially remain the same. In many cases, the patient is treated in the same unit and is not aware they are being cared for on an outpatient basis.

Two-Midnight Rule Will Accelerate Trend of Inpatient Care Shifting to Outpatient

We expect the two-midnight rule to accelerate the now well-established trend of inpatient admissions converting to outpatient status (see Exhibit 1) and observation stays at most hospitals continuing to grow in 2014.

The shift from inpatient admissions to outpatient status over the last several years, is due to a variety of factors, including Medicare reviews of medical necessity for inpatient stays and changing modalities of care that require fewer inpatient stays. The two-midnight rule adds to these pressures.

EXHIBIT 1

Two-Midnight Rule Will Exacerbate Trend of Declining Admissions and Growing Observation Stays

Source: Moody’s

Hospitals with Short Lengths of Stay Most Affected

Low acuity community hospitals are highly exposed to this rule change. These hospitals tend to have a greater share of medical cases often resulting in short hospital stays, but still consuming significant resources from tests, drugs and other inpatient hospital care. Under the new rule, shorter hospital stays are likely to convert from inpatient cases to lower-paying outpatient cases. Diagnoses that fall into this category typically involve chest pain and gastrointestinal issues and risk conversion to outpatient status.

Hospitals with low average lengths of stay and lower acuity are typically smaller and lower- rated (see Exhibit 2), with less financial flexibility to absorb reduced revenue under the new the rule.

-2.0%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 (est)

Admissions Growth Rate Observation Stays Growth Rate

U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

3 MARCH 12, 2014

SECTOR COMMENT: TWO-MIDNIGHT RULE WILL REDUCE REVENUE FOR MOST HOSPITALS

EXHIBIT 2

Lower Rated Hospitals Exposed Due to Lower Acuity and Length of Stay

Source: Moody’s

Lower Revenue Will Affect All Hospitals With High Proportion of Inpatient Care

Hospitals that depend on inpatient care for the majority of operating profit, regardless of size, will see reduced profit from the rule change. Due to high fixed costs, small fluctuations in patient volume can significantly impact profitability as outpatient care generates less revenue per case than inpatient.

Tertiary hospitals and academic medical centers will also be impacted. Although they have fewer low-acuity cases as a share of overall patient volume, they are predominantly focused on inpatient care. Because their cost base is typically higher than community hospitals, the conversion of patients to outpatient will result in greater losses on a per case basis.

Hospitals that perform a large number of surgeries on an inpatient basis will be less affected by the change. Many inpatient surgeries are on the CMS “Inpatient Only” list, which requires certain procedures be performed and billed on an inpatient basis, even if the patient is only in the hospital for one night.

Small Hospitals Lack Adequate Staff to Adapt to New Rule

We expect smaller hospitals with less integrated medical staffs and fewer support resources to have greater difficulty adapting to the rule change than larger hospitals.

The two midnight rule does not automatically convert all short stay admissions to outpatient status and requires appropriate physician documentation. Patients that are expected to be in the hospital for more than 48 hours, but are subsequently discharged early will qualify for inpatient reimbursement so long as the admitting physician properly documents that the admission was initially warranted. Ensuring proper documentation is unlikely to be a challenge for larger hospitals with well integrated medical staffs and additional administrative resources. However, smaller hospitals may find it harder to implement documentation changes with thinner medical and support staffs.

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.5

4.6

4.7

4.8

4.9

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

2.00

All Ratings Aa A Baa Below Baa

Medicare Case Mix Index Average Length of Stay (Days)

U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

4 MARCH 12, 2014

SECTOR COMMENT: TWO-MIDNIGHT RULE WILL REDUCE REVENUE FOR MOST HOSPITALS

Fewer RAC Claims Provide A Silver Lining

Although the two-midnight rule is negative for hospitals, it could lessen the financial pinch from recovery auditor contractor (RAC) reviews. RACs audit hospital Medicare claims and can claw back overpayments for improper admissions. Over the last few years, RACs have reviewed the medical records of many short-stay admissions, looking for admissions not medically necessary. The reviews have contributed to the industry-wide shift from inpatient to outpatient care and resulting lost revenue. The two-midnight rule could provide some relief from RAC reviews by substituting a strict rule set for the ambiguity involved in borderline cases.

U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

5 MARCH 12, 2014

SECTOR COMMENT: TWO-MIDNIGHT RULE WILL REDUCE REVENUE FOR MOST HOSPITALS

Moody’s Related Research

Industry Outlook:

» 2014 Outlook – US Not-for-Profit Hospitals, November 2013 (160569)

Median report:

» US Not-for-Profit Hospital 2012 Medians Show Balance Sheet Stability Despite Weaker Performance, August 2013 (157417)

To access any of these reports, click on the entry above. Note that these references are current as of the date of publication of this report and that more recent reports may be available. All research may not be available to all clients.

U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

6 MARCH 12, 2014

SECTOR COMMENT: TWO-MIDNIGHT RULE WILL REDUCE REVENUE FOR MOST HOSPITALS

Report Number: 165866

Author Daniel Steingart, CFA

Editor David Goetzl

Production Associate Vikas Baisla

© 2014 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. (“MIS”) AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (“MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s Publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Shareholder Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for “retail clients” to make any investment decision based on MOODY’S credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.