29
1 Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas Jorge Casalderrey-Solana Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Work in collaboration with Derek Teaney

Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

  • Upload
    maeve

  • View
    17

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas. Jorge Casalderrey-Solana Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Work in collaboration with Derek Teaney. Outline. Momentum transfer in gauge theories. Langevin model for Heavy Quarks. Momentum transfer from density matrix. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

1

Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

Jorge Casalderrey-Solana

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Work in collaboration with Derek Teaney

Page 2: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

2

Outline

Momentum transfer in gauge theoriesLangevin model for Heavy Quarks

Momentum transfer from density matrix

Momentum transfer in terms of Wilson lines (non perturbative def.)

Computation in strongly couple N=4 SYM

String solution spanning the Kruskal plane

Small fluctuations of the string contour and retarded correlators

Comparison with other computations

Static Quark

Quark Moving at finite v

Analysis of fluctuations

World Sheet horizon

Page 3: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

3

Langevin Model for Heavy Quarks Moore, Teaney 03

TMp ~

T

1 MT

TTM

HQ classical on medium correlations scale

white noise '' tttt yy

Einstein relations:MTD 2

22TD

iDii pt

dt

dp

random force drag

Mean transfer momentum

Heavy Quark with v<<1 neglect radiation

Page 4: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

4

Density Matrix of a Heavy QuarkEikonalized E=M >> T

mediumQ

momentum change

medium correlations

observation

Fixed gauge field propagation =color rotation

duAi

e

Evolution of density matrix:

Un-ordered Wilson Loop!

Introduce type 1 and type 2 fields as in no-equilibrium and thermal field theory (Schwinger-Keldish)

0

00 ,2

, zr

xt

tvzr

xt 0,2

,

tvzr

xt 0,2

,

00 ,2

, zr

xt

Page 5: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

5

Momentum BroadeningTransverse momentum transferred

Transverse gradient Fluctuation of the Wilson line

Dressed field strength

tie 1y

2y0

Fyv(t1,y1)t1y1

Fyv(t2,y2)t2y2

Four possible correlators

Page 6: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

6

Wilson Line From Classical Strings

If the branes are not extremal they are “black branes” horizon

Heavy Quark Move one brane to ∞. The dynamics are described by a classical string between black and boundary barnes

Nambu-Goto action minimal surface with boundary the quark world-line.

Which String Configuration corresponds to the 1-2 Wilson Line?

Page 7: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

7

Kruskal MapAs in black holes, (t, r) –coordinates are only defined for r>r0

Proper definition of coordinate, two copies of (t, r) related by time reversal.

In the presence of black branes the space has two boundaries (L and R)

SUGRA fields on L and R boundaries are type 1 and 2 sources

Son, Herzog (02)

The presence of two boundaries leads to properly defined thermal correlators (KMS relations)

Maldacena

Page 8: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

8

Static String Solution=Kruskal PlaneThe string has two endpoints, one at each boundary.

Minimal surface with static world-line at each boundary

Transverse fluctuations of the end points can be classified in type 1 and 2, according to L, R

Fluctuation at each boundary

V=0

U=0

Page 9: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

9

Fluctuations of the Quark World LineOriginal (t,u) coordinates:

The string falls straight to the horizon

Small fluctuation problem: Solve the linearized equation of motion

At the horizon (u1/r20)

4/1);( iti ueuY

Which solution should we pick?

4/* 1);( iti ueuY

infalling

outgoing

Page 10: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

10

Boundary Conditions for Fluctuations

RL

F

P

V=0

U=0

LR

RLuYuY RL ,0

,);();(.

Son, Herzong (Unruh):

Negative frequency modes LR YeYY ***

Positive frequency modes LR YeYY iV

iU

near horizon

LR

RLuYuY RL

,0

,);();(

*

.*

Page 11: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

11

Retarded Correlators and Defining:

),(),(1

lim'

*2/10

22

uYuYu

TRG uuR

We obtain KMS relations (static HQ in equilibrium with bath)

30 Im

2lim TG

TRu

And the static momentum transfer

Page 12: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

12

Consequences for Heavy QuarksUsing the Einstein relations the diffusion coefficient:

It is not QCD but… from data:

For the Langevin process to apply

TD

2

63

Page 13: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

13

Drag Force (Herzog, Karch, Kovtun, Kozcaz and Yaffe ; Gubser)

Heavy Quark forced to move with velocity v: Wilson line x=vt at the boundary

Energy and momentum flux through the string:

same

Very small relaxation times (t0=1/D)

charm bottom

Fluctuation-dissipation theorem

Page 14: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

14

Fluctuations of moving string

String solution at finite v

discontinous across the “past horizon” (artifact)

Small transverse fluctuations in (t,u) coordinates

;1);( 4/ uFueuY iitii

;1

1);( 0

2/4/ uFuueuY

iitio

Both solutions are infalling at the AdS horizon

0z

1z

1z

Which solution should we pick?

2/11u

rz

Page 15: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

15

World Sheet HorizonWe introduce

The induced metric is diagonal

Same as v=0 when zz ˆ

World sheet horizon at 1z

Page 16: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

16

Fluctuation MatchingThe two modes are infalling and outgoing in the world sheet horizon

)ˆ;ˆ(ˆ);( uYuY i )ˆ;ˆ(ˆ);( * uYuY o

Close to V=0 both behave as v=0 case same analyticity continuation

The fluctuations are smooth along the future (AdS) horizon.

Along the future world sheet horizon we impose the same analyticity condition as for in the v=0 case.

0ˆ U0U

(prescription to go around the pole) 1z ˆ

Page 17: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

17

Momentum BroadeningTaking derivatives of the action:

Similar to KMS relation but: GR is infalling in the world sheet horizon The temperature of the correlator is that of the world sheet black hole TTws

The mean transfer momentum isdiverges in v 1 limit

But the brane does not support arbitrary large electric fields (pair production)

2TM

Page 18: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

18

Conclusions

We have provided a “non-perturbative” definition of the momentum diffusion coefficient as derivatives of a Wilson Line

This definition is suited to compute in N=4 SYM by means of the AdS/CFT correspondence.

The results agree, via the Einstein relations, with the computations of the drag coefficient. This can be considered as an explicit check that AdS/CFT satisfy the fluctuation dissipation theorem.

The calculated scales as and takes much larger values than the perturbative extrapolation for QCD.

The momentum broadening at finite v diverges as but the calculation is limited to .

2TM

Page 19: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

19

Back up Slides

Page 20: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

20

Computation of (Radiative Energy Loss)q̂(Liu, Rajagopal, Wiedemann)

t

L

r0

Dipole amplitude: two parallel Wilson lines in the light cone:

2TM

LLqS eeW

ˆ4

1For small transverse distance:

Order of limits:

11 v M2

String action becomes imaginary for

323.5ˆ TNgqSYM entropy scaling

fmGeVqQCD2126ˆ

Page 21: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

21

Energy Dependence of (JC & X. N. Wang)

From the unintegrated PDF

Evolution leads to growth of the gluon density,

In the DLA x

q

T

T

eqx1

ln22

2

~,

cTT

Nq

k

dkq

2

2

22 2

Saturation effects cs LLQq ,min~ˆ 2

For an infinite conformal plasma (L>Lc) with Q2max=6ET.At strong coupling

ETC

Cq

A

RR

2

2

HTL provide the initial conditions for evolution.

Page 22: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

22

Charm Quark Flow ?(Moore, Teaney 03)

(b=6.5 fm)

Page 23: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

23

Heavy Quark Suppression (Derek Teaney, to appear)

Charm and Bottom spectrum from Cacciari et al.

Hadronization from measured fragmentation functions

Electrons from charm and bottom semileptonic decays

non photonic electros

Page 24: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

24

Noise from Microscopic Theory

HQ momentum relaxation time: DDT

Mmedium

DHQ ~

1

Consider times such that mediumHQ

microscopic force (random)

charge density electric field

qE

Page 25: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

25

Heavy Quark Partition FunctionMcLerran, Svetitsky (82)

Polyakov Loop

YM + Heavy Quark states YM states

Integrating out the heavy quark

Page 26: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

26

Changing the Contour Time

Page 27: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

27

as a Retarded Correlator

is defined as an unordered correlator:

From ZHQ the only unordered correlator is

Defining:

In the 0 limit the contour dependence disappears :

Page 28: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

28

Check in Perturbation Theory

= optical theorem

= imaginary part of gluon propagator

Page 29: Momentum Broadening of Heavy Probes in Strongly Couple Plasmas

29

Force Correlators from Wilson Lines

Which is obtained from small fluctuations of the Wilson line

Integrating the Heavy Quark propagator:

Since in there is no time order:

E(t1,y1)t1y1

E(t2,y2)t2y2