1
Ensemble variability in rainfall forecasts of Hurricane Irene (2011) Molly B. Smith 1 , Ryan Torn 1 , Kristen L. Corbosiero 1 , and Philip Pegion 2 1 University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York; 2 CIRES, Boulder, Colorado Motivation Landfalling TCs are often associated with widespread heavy precipitation, which can lead to devastating flood events. Relatively few studies have explored the sensitivity of precipitation forecasts for such events to model initial conditions. We explore the physical processes that modulate precipitation variability in ensemble forecasts of heavy rainfall events. This work uses Hurricane Irene (2011) as a case study. Ø Irene featured catastrophic inland flooding caused by widespread rainfall totals of 4–7 inches (100–175 mm). Ø Some parts of the Catskill region of New York in particular received up to 12 inches (305 mm). WRF Ensemble Mean Conclusions Precipitation in the wetter, western members appears to be driven by a combination of terrain effects, synoptic forcing, and high available moisture. Precipitation in the drier, eastern members appears to be driven primarily by synoptic forcing, as less moisture was available during the period that had strong upslope forcing. Clustering ensemble members into specific forecast scenarios can reveal more information than just using the ensemble mean and standard deviation. Methodology An 80-member 0.5° GFS ensemble was initialized at 0000 UTC 27 August 2011 and run for 48 hours, until 0000 UTC 29 August. Ø These GFS ensemble forecasts were created with the operational version of the GFS in use from 2013–2015. The 80 members were then downscaled to 3 km with WRF, in order to better simulate the effects of terrain and mesoscale processes. Ø The physics used are comparable to those employed with the HRRR. Rainfall totals for the Catskills were analyzed in terms of variability between members. Observed Accumulations (mm) Observation source: EOL WRF 3km Predicted Accumulations (mm) Although the ensemble mean slightly under-forecasts precipitation overall, it does very well in the Northeast, and manages to capture the peak accumulations over the Catskills. Catskills Catskills Observed Catskills Precipitation (170 mm) 00–48-h Catskills Ensemble Precipitation Distribution Substantial variability exists between members. To determine the cause of this variability, the ensemble members are clustered based on the 39-h horizontal distribution of precipitation over southeastern New York. Cluster 1: Low Rainfall Cluster 2: Eastern Cluster Cluster 3: Western Cluster Cluster 1 is the residual cluster, so the focus of this study is to compare the wet, western Cluster 3 with the dry, eastern Cluster 2. Three hypotheses to explain the variability between the wet and dry clusters: 1 2 3 Wetter members have stronger upslope forcing over the Catskills than drier members. Wetter members have greater moisture convergence over the Catskills than drier members. Wetter members have stronger Q- vector convergence over the Catskills than drier members. Wetter, Western Cluster Drier, Eastern Cluster Wetter, Western Cluster Drier, Eastern Cluster Wetter, Western Cluster Drier, Eastern Cluster Forecast Hour: 39 700-hPa Isotherms 700-hPa Q-Vector Conv. Forecast Hour: 39 1000–700-hPa Mean Winds Integrated Moisture Trans. Forecast Hour: 39 900-hPa Winds 3-hourly Precipitation Topography contoured in white The wet members featured easterly winds into the steep eastern slopes of the Catskills. The dry members featured northeasterly winds into more gradual inclines. The wet members featured larger values of moisture convergence over the Catskills. The dry members featured smaller values of moisture convergence over the Catskills. The wet members featured less Q-vector convergence over the Catskills. The wet members featured more Q-vector convergence over the Catskills. Hypothesis Supported! Hypothesis Supported! Hypothesis Not Supported! Contact: Molly Smith, [email protected] Averaged over this domain Clustered by precipitation dist. over this domain

Molly B. Smith , Ryan Torn...Ensemble variability in rainfall forecasts of Hurricane Irene (2011) Molly B. Smith1, Ryan Torn1, Kristen L. Corbosiero1, and Philip Pegion 2 1University

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Molly B. Smith , Ryan Torn...Ensemble variability in rainfall forecasts of Hurricane Irene (2011) Molly B. Smith1, Ryan Torn1, Kristen L. Corbosiero1, and Philip Pegion 2 1University

Ensemble variability in rainfall forecasts of Hurricane Irene (2011)Molly B. Smith1, Ryan Torn1, Kristen L. Corbosiero1, and Philip Pegion2

1University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York; 2CIRES, Boulder, Colorado

Motivation• Landfalling TCs are often associated with widespread

heavy precipitation, which can lead to devastating flood events.

• Relatively few studies have explored the sensitivity of precipitation forecasts for such events to model initial conditions.

• We explore the physical processes that modulate precipitation variability in ensemble forecasts of heavy rainfall events.

• This work uses Hurricane Irene (2011) as a case study.

Ø Irene featured catastrophic inland flooding caused by widespread rainfall totals of 4–7 inches (100–175 mm).

Ø Some parts of the Catskill region of New York in particular received up to 12 inches (305 mm).

WRF Ensemble Mean

Conclusions• Precipitation in the wetter, western members

appears to be driven by a combination of terrain effects, synoptic forcing, and high available moisture.

• Precipitation in the drier, eastern members appears to be driven primarily by synoptic forcing, as less moisture was available during the period that had strong upslope forcing.

• Clustering ensemble members into specific forecast scenarios can reveal more information than just using the ensemble mean and standard deviation.

Methodology• An 80-member 0.5° GFS ensemble was initialized at

0000 UTC 27 August 2011 and run for 48 hours, until 0000 UTC 29 August.

Ø These GFS ensemble forecasts were created with the operational version of the GFS in use from 2013–2015.

• The 80 members were then downscaled to 3 km with WRF, in order to better simulate the effects of terrain and mesoscale processes.

Ø The physics used are comparable to those employed with the HRRR.

• Rainfall totals for the Catskills were analyzed in terms of variability between members.

ObservedAccumulations (mm)

Observationsource:EOL

WRF3kmPredictedAccumulations (mm)

Although the ensemble mean slightly under-forecasts precipitation overall, it does very well in the Northeast, and manages to capture the peak accumulations over the Catskills.

Catskills Catskills

ObservedCatskillsPrecipitation(170mm)

00–48-h Catskills Ensemble Precipitation Distribution

Substantial variability exists between members.

To determine the cause of this variability, the ensemble members are clustered based on the 39-h horizontal distribution of precipitation over southeastern New York.

Cluster1:LowRainfall

Cluster2:EasternCluster

Cluster3:WesternCluster

Cluster 1 is the residual cluster, so the focus of this study is to compare the wet, western Cluster 3 with the dry, eastern Cluster 2.

Three hypotheses to explain the variability between the wet and dry clusters:

1 2 3Wetter members have stronger upslope forcing over the Catskills than drier members.

Wetter members have greater moisture convergence over the Catskills than drier members.

Wetter members have stronger Q-vector convergence over the Catskills than drier members.

Wetter,WesternCluster Drier,EasternCluster

Wetter,WesternCluster Drier,EasternCluster

Wetter,WesternCluster Drier,EasternCluster

Wetter,WesternCluster Drier,EasternCluster

Wetter,WesternCluster Drier,EasternCluster

Wetter,WesternCluster Drier,EasternCluster

ForecastHour:39700-hPaIsotherms700-hPaQ-VectorConv.

ForecastHour:391000–700-hPaMeanWindsIntegratedMoistureTrans.

ForecastHour:39900-hPaWinds3-hourlyPrecipitationTopographycontouredinwhite

The wet members featured easterly winds into the steep eastern slopes of the Catskills.

The dry members featured northeasterly winds into more gradual inclines.

The wet members featured larger values of moisture convergence over the Catskills.

The dry members featured smaller values of moisture convergence over the Catskills.

The wet members featured less Q-vector convergence over the Catskills.

The wet members featured more Q-vector convergence over the Catskills.

Hypothesis Supported! Hypothesis Supported! Hypothesis Not Supported!

Contact: Molly Smith, [email protected]

Averaged over this domain

Clustered by precipitation dist. over this domain