10
Verónica García Malo UNFCCC secretariat SDM / PEA Module 3.2 Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes 1st SDM Joint Coordination Workshop Bonn, Germany 24 March, 2012

Module 3.2 Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Module 3.2 Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes. 1st SDM Joint Coordination Workshop Bonn, Germany 24 March, 2012. August 2011 > AIE. Performance Assessments. Background. “MEASURES TO STREAMLINE AND FURTHER IMPROVE JI ACCREDITATION PROCESS AND FUNCTIONNING ” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Module 3.2  Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes

Verónica García MaloUNFCCC secretariat SDM / PEA

Module 3.2 Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes

1st SDM Joint Coordination WorkshopBonn, Germany24 March, 2012

Page 2: Module 3.2  Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes

Background

“MEASURES TO STREAMLINE AND FURTHER IMPROVE JI

ACCREDITATION PROCESS AND FUNCTIONNING”

JISC Approved

Option 2: Aligning the steps of JI accreditation procedure with the steps of CDM accreditation procedure

(Desk review, on-site assessment, Performance assessments…)

Page 3: Module 3.2  Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes

Background

Particular focus on JI specific areas in performing determinations and

verifications and changes that have occurred since the last on-site

assessment

CDM assessment report can be used by

AIE to show compliance to

common requirements

Focus on Impartiality,

Competence, Process and QMS

Page 4: Module 3.2  Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes

Background

Option 3: Aligning the JI accreditation process with the CDM accreditation process steps and carrying out combined/joint assessment resulting in two reports for decision making of the two accreditation panels.

Full alignment of the CDM and JI

accreditation procedures

Adoption of a common

accreditation standard.

The use of the same roster of

expert qualified in both CDM and JI

using same qualification

criteria.

Page 5: Module 3.2  Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes

Background

JOINT SESSION OF THE CDM AND JI ACCREDITATION PANELS

February 3th, 2012.

Discussed possible areas for collaboration

1. Full alignment of the accreditation procedures

2. Common accreditation standard.

3. Same roster of expert with same qualification criteria.

Page 6: Module 3.2  Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes

Combined Assessor resource pool for CDM & JI

Each AP has established concrete requirement criteria to qualify

persons and include them in their specific ARoE

a) JI “ToR for the JI Assessment Teams”,

a) CDM “Criteria for selection and use of assessors & experts” for

CDM.

There are differences between CDM and JI requirements but

people in common

Page 7: Module 3.2  Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes

Steps to go

1.- Integration of SDM Accreditation Roster of Experts • In the first stage

• Persons in the JI ARoE that are not in the CDM ARoE, and viceversa, to maintain

their qualifications need to fulfill requirements plus

training

Implementation of this stage will give us

15 persons SDM, 20 as JI

and 38 as CDM

According to their qualifications persons can be appointed in JI Assessments, CDM

Assessments or both.

SDM ARoE

SDM/CDM/JI Assessors & Technical Experts.

SDM ARoE

Page 8: Module 3.2  Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes

Steps to go

2.- Moving persons to the SDM qualification status

• In the second stage only SDM members will remain in the SDM ARoE.

ARoE with SDM Lead Assessors/Assessors and SDM Technical Experts.

• Training will be combined and gaps of technical expertise in some Technical Areas will be closed.

Page 9: Module 3.2  Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes

Steps to go

Persons in the SDM ARoE can be appointed in

JI and/or CDM Assessments

or in

COMBINED/JOINT ASSESSMENTS

Page 10: Module 3.2  Alignment of CDM and JI accreditation processes

THANK YOU VERY MUCH