Upload
jera
View
26
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Modeling of the Potential for Vertically Downward Saltwater Migration from a Dredge Pond. Peter F. Andersen 1 , Lisa M. Grogin 1 , and Ronald L. Bartel 2 1 GeoTrans, Inc., Roswell, Georgia, United States 2 Northwest Florida Water Management District, Havana, Florida, United States. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Modeling of the Potential for Vertically Downward Saltwater Migration from a Dredge Pond
Peter F. Andersen1, Lisa M. Grogin1, and Ronald L. Bartel2
1GeoTrans, Inc., Roswell, Georgia, United States2Northwest Florida Water Management District, Havana,
Florida, United States
Problem Statement
• Desire to deposit dredge materials from saltwater body into inland barrow pit
• Two concerns:– Saltwater (from dredge slurry) will migrate
vertically downward and contaminate a public supply well 1800 ft away (short-term + density dependent)
– Dredge materials will migrate from sediments into aquifer (long-term + non-density dependent
• Are current and future hydraulic gradients sufficient to contain the dredge materials and prevent contamination of the well and aquifer?
Conceptual Model of Question to be Answered
Dredge Pond Pond
Water Supply Well Stream
To Well?
To Stream?
Approach
• Characterization of flow system• Time series analysis of hydraulic
gradients• Numerical modeling to assess and
demonstrate physics of flow• Development of metrics for:
– Allowing dredging to begin– When dredge deposition would need to stop
• Development of groundwater and surface water monitoring plans
Project Location
Model Construction
(Plan View)
Dredge Pond
Stream
Ponds
Water Supply Well
Model Construction: Vertical
Surfacia lZone(SZ)
M ainProducing
Zone(M PZ)
Low Perm eability Zone
Layer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
South Pond
North Pond
Jackson Branch
1 20 500 1000
SCALE IN FEETVertical Exaggeration x10
Model Details
• SEAWAT-2000• Calibration (steady state flow)
– 17 heads, 3 multilevel wells– ME = 0.19 ft; MAE = 0.35 ft (7.8% of variation)
• Predictive simulations– Lower head in pond from 3.7 ft to 2 ft– Concentration of saltwater in pond = 12,700 ug/L– Saltwater concentration active for 6 months
• 10 weeks dredging• 16 weeks residence time
– Various configurations of boundary heads to represent:
• Regional water level changes• Well pumping
Scenarios Evaluated
• Minimum Operating Conditions– Base case boundary heads
– Conservative 0.5 ft upward head gradient at monitor well (1 ft required; 3-6 ft typical)
• Explicit Inclusion of Pumping Well– Implicitly incorporated in BCs
– Additionally included by superimposing Hantush-generated heads on BCs
• Worst Case– 2 ft downward gradient occurs immediately
– Lasts entire 6 months of dredging
Minimum Operating Conditions
Concentration of Chloride Plume
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Time (d)
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n (
mg
/L)
Far Side of Creek
Upgradient of Creek
1 20 500 1000
SC ALE IN FEET
Far S ide of C reek Location
Creek R iver C ells
LEGEND
Peoples #8
180 Days
Explicit Inclusion of Pumping Well
Concentration of Chloride Plume
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Time (d)
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n (
mg
/L)
Far Side of Creek
Upgradient of Creek
1 20 500 1000
SC ALE IN FEET
Far S ide of C reek Location
Creek R iver C ells
LEGEND
Peoples #8
Worst Case (Head Gradient Reversal)
Concentration of Chloride Plume
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Time (d)
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n (
mg
/L)
Far Side of Creek
Upgradient of Creek
1 20 500 1000
SC ALE IN FEET
Far S ide of C reek Location
Creek R iver C ells
LEGEND
Peoples #8
Performance Metrics for Dredging
• Condition below which dredging could not commence:– 2.5 ft NGVD in DW3– 2 std dev below wet season
high; 2 std dev above drought condition low
• Condition that dredging would stop:– Upward gradient of < 1 ft at
PZ-19 / DW3 monitor well
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
06
/26
/02
07
/26
/02
08
/25
/02
09
/24
/02
11
/11
/02
12
/11
/02
01
/10
/03
02
/09
/03
03
/11
/03
04
/10
/03
05
/10
/03
06
/09
/03
07
/08
/03
08
/08
/03
09
/07
/03
10
/07
/03
11
/06
/03
12
/06
/03
01
/05
/04
02
/04
/04
03
/05
/04
Sta
ge
(fee
t, N
AV
D 1
988)
Deep Well (DW3)
Shallow Well (PZ-19)
X
X
X - Deep Well - taped measurement X - Shallow Well - taped measurement
Top of DW3 well casing 6.67'DW3 well flowing, level above well casing (6.67')
Well casing extended, continuous recording resumed
X
X
Postscript
• Dredging finally commenced March 28, 2008 and was completed 3 weeks later
Postscript
• An upward gradient between the Deep and Shallow system was present during the entire operation
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
3/13/2008 3/23/2008 4/2/2008 4/12/2008 4/22/2008 5/2/2008 5/12/2008
Time
Sta
ge
(ft)
Deep Well
Shallow Well
Pond
Pump-dow n priorto dredging
Dredging Begins
Dredging Ends
Postscript
• An estimated 200,000 cu yds of sediment was removed from Bayou Chico
• Monitoring will continue for 3 years:– Groundwater levels– Groundwater concentrations– Surface water concentrations
• Remediation could be triggered by exceeding of groundwater concentration limits
Conclusions (1)
• An unusual saltwater intrusion problem!
• Numerical model was useful to assess and demonstrate effects of scenarios
• Model helped fill in gaps monitoring network
• Only worst case scenario—a reversal of gradient—created a potential problem
• Head and gradient metrics were established to prevent loss of containment from pond
Conclusions (2)
• Example of use of modeling, time series analysis, and monitoring to ensure success
• Actual result was positive and (so far) in line with model predictions
• Length of dredging was overestimated: 10 weeks vs 3 weeks actual; another conservative modeling assumption
Questions?
Pete AndersenGeoTrans, Inc.Roswell, Georgia, USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: 770 642 1000