25
Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers ® Nagi Elabbasi, Xiaohu Liu, Stuart Brown (Veryst Engineering) Mike Vidal, Matthew Pappalardo (Nordson EFD) COMSOL Conference 2012, Boston, MA Veryst Engineering 47A Kearney Road Needham, Massachusetts 02494 phone 781.433.0433 [email protected] www.veryst.com Excerpt from the Proceedings of the 2012 COMSOL Conference in Boston

Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Modeling a laminar flow static mixer in comsol

Citation preview

Page 1: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers

®

Nagi Elabbasi, Xiaohu Liu, Stuart Brown (Veryst Engineering)

Mike Vidal, Matthew Pappalardo (Nordson EFD)

COMSOL Conference 2012, Boston, MA

Veryst Engineering 47A Kearney Road Needham, Massachusetts 02494 phone 781.433.0433 [email protected] www.veryst.com

Excerpt from the Proceedings of the 2012 COMSOL Conference in Boston

Page 2: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Introduction

• Laminar flow static mixers are inexpensive and suitable for wide range of industrial applications

• There is very limited diffusion in between the mixed fluids

– Mixing must involve dividing and recombining fluids

2

Image courtesy of Nordson EFD

Page 3: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Introduction

• Multiphase CFD simulation cannot be used by itself to predict mixing quality due to numerical diffusion

3

Size of fluid streaks too

small for detection with

multiphase CFD only

Experimental data

Is there a more

suitable approach?

Yes!

Page 4: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Multiphase CFD Example

• A 2D example demonstrating dispersion in multiphase flow

4

Fluid 1

Fluid 2

Too much phase dispersion even with fine mesh and low numerical diffusion

Page 5: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Multiphase CFD Example

5

Phase dispersion region too wide

If there is no diffusion between fluids this width should be zero

Page 6: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Modeling Approach

1. CFD analysis to predict overall mixer performance, flow pattern and pressure drop

2. Use streamlines or mass-less particle tracing to track motion of the fluid particles

3. Export streamline or particle tracing data for evaluation of mixing efficiency

6

Page 7: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Step 1: CFD Analysis

• CFD analysis to predict overall mixer performance, flow pattern and pressure drop

– May be a two-phase analysis if two fluids have different density or viscosity

– Very low Reynolds number flow

– Assumed Newtonian fluids

7

Page 8: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

CFD Analysis

• Velocity and pressure drop for a specific mixer

8

Pre

ssu

re

Velocity profile Pressure drop

Page 9: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Step 2: Streamlines/Particle Tracing

• Use streamlines or mass-less particle tracing to track the motion of fluid particles

– Limited numerical diffusion

– Large number of particles required

– Accuracy of time integration essential

– Insert streamlines in a uniform grid at any section

9

Page 10: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Streamlines Calculation

10

• The same 2D example

Single-phase flow with streamlines

Two-phase flow

Unrealistic mixed region due to numerical diffusion

Distinct fluid boundary

Page 11: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Particle Tracing

• Generate grid of mass-less particles instead of streamlines

• Poincare sections generated by COMSOL provide useful visualization tool

11

Page 12: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Step 3: Mixing Algorithm

• Export streamlines or mass-less particle tracing data using COMSOL’s Java script feature

• Calculate coordinates where each streamline intersects different sections along static mixer

– Similar to Poincare maps

• Divide each mixer section into a suitable sized grid and calculate number of streamlines intersecting each grid

12

Page 13: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Mixing Algorithm

• Evaluate mixing using 2 metrics:

– Coefficient of variation

– Sectional images for detecting unmixed streaks

• Insert streamlines at multiple locations along mixer to increase accuracy and check level of numerical diffusion

– Find optimal settings for streamline calculation

13

Page 14: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Coefficient of Variation

• One number that measures the mixing quality at a mixer cross-section

• Has positive value (~1.0) for no mixing, and 0.0 for “complete mixing”

• Complete mixing means good mixing at a specific cell size

14

Page 15: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Coefficient of Variation

• Typical Coefficient of Variation result

Minimum

detectable value

for current settings

Local oscillations

function of cross-

sectional area of

mixer

Rate of CoV drop

indicative of mixer

efficiency

15

Page 16: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Coefficient of Variation

• Coefficient of variation predicts overall mixing quality. It is not ideal for detecting streaks.

• Streaks best detected by examining images of mixing at different cross-sections

A fluid streak. Easy

to detect visually,

not through CoV

16

Page 17: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Algorithm Validation

• Performed mixing experiments using two epoxy materials that solidify when mixed – a black and a white compound

• After solidification mixer sliced into about 40 sections to visually assess mixing progression

• Simulate same experiment with developed mixing algorithm and compare predictions

17

Page 18: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Algorithm Validation

• Experimental sectional images

– Images only shown for first half of mixer

– Exact entry angle of fluid into mixer not captured

18

Page 19: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Mixing Results

• Before first inverter

Good agreement between experimental and numerical predictions

19

Experiment Simulation

Page 20: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

• At end of first inverter

Mixing Results

Area of very slow flow/recirculation

20

Experiment Simulation

Page 21: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

• Before second inverter

Mixing Results

Ellipses show captured streaks

21

Experiment Simulation

Page 22: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

• After second inverter

Mixing Results

Simulation also captures flow patterns

22

Experiment Simulation

Page 23: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Summary

• Developed algorithm for evaluating mixing quality in static mixers

– CFD simulation to predict overall fluid flow and pressure drop in mixer

– Streamline or particle tracing calculation to track fluid particles

– Sectional images at multiple sections along mixers

– Coefficient of variation that gives quantitative assessment of mixing quality

23

Page 24: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Summary

• Very good agreement obtained between experimental and simulation results

• Advantages of using COMSOL Multiphysics

– Accurate CFD simulation

• Single-phase and multi-phase flows

– Accurate streamline and particle tracing calculations with over 200,000 particles

– Ease of scripting with interfaces to Java and MATLAB

24

Page 25: Modeling of Laminar Flow Static Mixers COMOL

Veryst Engineering

Current and Future Work

• Evaluating mixing quality for different fluid flow rates, viscosities and mixing proportions

– Mixed fluids are frequently non-Newtonian (shear thinning, shear thickening or thixotropic)

• Using developed tool to optimize static mixer designs for Nordson EFD and investigate radically different mixer designs

25