Upload
vuongkhue
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Int. J. MAr. Sci. Eng., 4(1), 25-36, Winter & Spring 2014
ISSN 2251-6743
© IAU
Modeling of Hydrodynamic Factors for Management of Coastal
Hazards, Case Study: Khamir Port, Persian Gulf, Iran
1 * M. A. Nezammahalleh;
1M. Yamani;
1Sh. Soltani;
2A. Maldar Badeli;
3A. Rastegar
1 Geomorphology, Physical Geography Department, Geography Faculty, University of Tehran, Tehran, 2 Department of Civil Engineering, Neka Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neka, Iran
3 Department of Engineering and Technology, Golestan University, Aliabad Katool, Iran
Received 2 November 2013; revised 10 March 2014; accepted 26 April 2014
ABSTRACT: In coastal areas, hydrodynamic factors make changes in shorelines geomorphology. This can affect
coastal facilities and cause hazards to human societies in the areas. This study has investigated the influence of wave
and tide properties on Khamir Port, Hormoz Strait in coast of Persian Gulf. The purpose of the study is to make a
mathematical regional and local modeling of water level fluctuations and flow velocity by MIKE21 application.
These models provide some maps to show tide and wave effects on shoreline changes. The maps have been created as
the results to reveal the maximum advance of water onto the coast in high tide and low tide patterns. Time series of
water level variations in two months and the flow velocity have been examined in some randomly selected points in
the study area. This can be argued that these water level fluctuations may undermine coastal structures and alter
shoreline geomorphology. These maps resulted from the modeling can be used for safety planning in constructional
projects, tourism, and insurance management.
Keywords: hydrodynamic; coast; MIKE21; Khamir Port
INTRODUCTION
1 Coasts are the confluence of land and sea where many
varying factors including hydrodynamic and climatic
processes are effective on their arrangement and
morphogenesis (Fruergaard et al., 2013; Sherman,
2013). However, more considerable for determining
coastal hazards is the border of the land. This is
influenced by effects of marine processes upon the
shore, i.e., the interaction between land and sea, and
by advances of sea water onto the lands due to sea
level oscillations. Investigations on detection of
maximum advances of sea flows onto the land is the
most important management approaches and
measures against the marine floods and consequent
economic and social damages (Touili et al., 2014;
Peduzzi et al., 2012; Johnston et al., 2014;
Nezammahalleh et al., 2013). Indeed, the
investigation about the behavior of sea in shoreline
makes it possible to define a buffer zone for the
coasts both to obviate the influence of marine floods
and to avoid development of investments on the areas
(Sherman, 2013; Johnston et al., 2014). Hence, the
purpose of this research is to examine hydrodynamic
factors affecting coastal hazards (Tabeshpour et al.,
2013) and to recognize the coastal line by tide effects.
*Corresponding Author Email: [email protected]
This explains protection of a band along the coast
regarding natural phenomena and also environmental
and human requirements.
The northern coastal areas of Hormoz Strait are
affected by degradation due to erosion, transportation,
and deposition processes. The shoreline is changing
by the operation of different factors including the
processes due to hydrodynamics of water bodies and
also dynamics of land variables (Nezammahalleh et
al., 2013) as well as bio-climate situation and human
activities (Sherman, 2013; Todd et al., 2009). Khamir
Port on the northern coast of Hormoz Strait in Persian
Gulf has been separated as a county from the
administration of Bandar Abbas County under the
administrative division in 2004 and experienced
much development. Thus, it is necessary to determine
maximum advance of flows into the land and also to
know shoreline extents and the effective factors in the
area in order to conduct a coastal integrated
management and to mitigate the influence of marine
flooding.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Hydrodynamic influence in coastal geomorphology:
Protection of coast against such processes as erosion,
sea level rise by storms, long term changes in sea
M. A. Nezammahalleh et al.
26
level and their breaking effects (Andersen, 2011) onto
coastal structures (Zendegani et al., 2012) involves
the study about the geomorphology of the coast
(Johnston et al., 2014). Thus, investigation on marine
phenomena in strip of shore including wave
propagation, tide characteristics, sea level changes,
and sediment behavior (Mojabi et al., 2013) are main
policies and suitable measures to reach the goals of
coastal protection.
Shoreline or the boundary of sea is directly defined
based on the influence of marine phenomena upon the
coast and the extent to which they impact the coastal
strip. It is essential to detect the areas of coast where
are influenced by the marine phenomena such as tidal
and long term fluctuations of sea level and the
advance of sea water onto the coast as a result of
wave setup, wind setup, and wave run up. This can be
as a coastal buffer zone with the steady and direct
interaction between sea and land (Fruergaard et al.,
2013).
Effective hydrodynamic parameters:
these factors are including tide, wave setup, wind
setup, and wave run up.
Tide: As during tide in open seas the water level
experiences continuous and almost regular changes,
the coastal areas accordingly varies as dry and wet
conditions through precession toward the land and
recession toward the sea (Robins et al., 2013). Given
the importance of the extent to which the flow
advance onto the land for land border determination,
the tidal characteristics must be considered as one of
the drastic factors for the definition.
To measure the quantitative values for the parameter
of tide in Khamir Port, MIKE21-HD-FM has been
used in this research (Sharifi et al., 2012). By this,
first a regional model after calibration determines the
properties of boundary conditions around a local
model. Then, the local model would be designed and
implemented based on hydrographic information,
with relatively fine mesh in the area of the project.
Wave setup: As a wave propagates toward coastal
area, it would be broken by the seabed at a point and
its energy would be dissipated (Hubard and Dodd,
2002; Vose et al., 2007). At the breaking point, the
average of sea level drops slightly due to an increase
in radiational tensions by depth decline. As the waves
propagate from the breaking point toward the coast,
the energy of the waves and the radiational tensions
are also decreased progressively. A continuous
increase, then, is occurred in the average of sea level
from the breaking point to the coast with the most at
the shoreline. The wave setup is the increase in
average sea level due to wave breaking and
propagation with a maximum rise at shoreline
(Hubard and Dodd, 2002; Vose et al., 2007;
Vousdoukas et al., 2009). The less the degree of slope
is the more advance the water would have onto the
coast and the wider the area it would impact and vice
versa.
In order to get quantitative values of the parameter in
the area, the annual properties and wave design have
first been determined for water near the area of the
project and then propagation of the designed wave
towards the coastal areas has given the wave setup of
the designed waves. In the method after the available
statistics of wind and wave of the area have been
explored, the statistics for basic studies will be
selected and the generation and propagation of waves
onto the coasts of the project area have been modeled.
The wave transfer modeling is conducted in two
stages: in the first stage, the process of wave
propagation and generation of effective parameters on
the waves are modeled using MIKE 21 SW from
deep waters to the area near project (Moeini and
Etemad-Shahidi, 2007; Sharifi et al., 2012). With the
calculation of wave rose, the designed waves have
been determined in varying effective directions for
different return periods using MIKE EVA. In second
stage based on exact local hydrographic information,
the modeling of designed wave transfer and wave
propagation towards the coast and shallow waters has
been carried out using LITPACK/LITDRIFT Model
and the characteristics of wave setup due to the
propagation have been calculated to recognize its
impact upon the bed and the buffer zone.
Wind setup: As winds blow over the seas, tensions
due to the friction between surface of water and air
flow give rise to a change in the water surface relative
to a normal condition so that it makes an oblique
plane in the surface of water with a low angle (Todd
et al., 2009). The increase in water level by wind as
that of wave setup causes the advance of water onto
the coastal lands depending on the slope of the
offshore areas.
In order to have the quantitative values of the
parameter, MIKE21-HD-FM has been used for the
area. The 2 dimensional horizontal equations of
shallow water flows are used in the Software as the
average flow equations in depth. After the effects of
wind on the water surface, including fluctuations and
flows, has been simulated, analysis of limit values has
then been applied to estimate the design values of
wind setup. Indeed, using EVA Tool in MIKE-ZERO
based on recommended distributions and maximum
method, the amounts of increase in water levels have
been calculated for return periods of 1, 2, 5, 10, 25,
50, and 100 years.
Wave run up: As a wave breaks, the remaining energy
forces the water to run up the coast and coastal
structures. The general trend of the phenomena
indicates that the amount of such run up over the
Int. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 4(1), 25-36, Winter & Spring, 2014
27
structures is the maximum vertical height of water
level. A prediction of wave run up can be applied to
determine the crest of a coastal structure and also to
specify the buffer of prohibition for the structures.
Since in the area of this project the coast has low
slope and the value of the parameter must be low, we
have not calculated the parameter (Hubard and Dodd,
2002; Vose et al., 2007; Vousdoukas et al., 2009).
Shoreline determination by tide:
Given the importance of the extent to which the water
advance onto the coast in specifying the boundary of
land in shore strip, the tide characteristics as an
effective factor must be taken into account for
identification of the boundary. In this section, the
pattern of water level fluctuation and the flows due to
tide must be examined in the area. The results of the
studies including velocity of the flumes and sea level
changes can be used in identification of shoreline and
of design sea level as well as the design of coastal
structures. The primary tool to obtain such a pattern is
mathematic modeling of hydrodynamics. This tool
makes it possible to determine the pattern of velocity
changes in flows and water level due to tide in the
area of the project.
After identification of the changes of water level by
tide in the study area (by the data from National
Cartographic Center of Iran), the model for Persian
Gulf as global model has been designed and
implemented. It has been also calibrated based on the
predicted levels in the proximity of the study area.
Then, the local model of hydrodynamics has been
designed based on the hydrographic information
available of the area. The boundary condition of
information of local model has been implemented
using the output results of regional model and the
output results are presented as changed in water level
and velocity by tide effects.
Mathematic modeling of water level fluctuations and
flow velocity by tide:
Given that for the implementation of a model of tidal
flow in the area there are not enough data, the
information about the needed boundary conditions
have been obtained from running a mathematic model
in a wider region. As a next step, a more limited
model has been used in the vicinity of the area with a
suitable resolution to compute the properties of tidal
waves. The wider model is the regional model and the
limited is the local one.
Regional model:
In the designed regional model on the area of this
research including entire the Persian Gulf and some
area of Oman Sea the water level data in tide gauges
in Chabahar Port in eastern coasts of Iran have been
used as boundary condition (f1). The output results of
regional model can be exploited as information of
boundary condition that is applicable to implement
the local model. The required parameters and the
results of establishing the regional hydrodynamic
model are presented.
The required parameters for establishing the regional
hydrodynamic model are explained as follow: bed
roughness coefficient that is introduced to the model
by manning coefficient relations, numerical extent
parameters including disrupting parameters including
the areas of triangular elements, temporal steps of
solving equations, the geometric and depth
information as bathymetry input to the model, and
suitable boundary condition including tidal levels
from the performed predictions.
Fig. 1: the spatial extent of regional model applicable for modeling tidal flows
Modeling of Hydrodynamic Factors for Management of Coastal Hazards
28
To design the regional model, we have used the
available hydrographic data of Persian Gulf and
Oman Sea, at scale of 1:500000. The time scale in the
modeling is 2001 and it is supposed that the pattern of
tidal fluctuations for all other years is similar to this
period. This is confirmed by the parameters of
maximum, minimum, average and the frequency
represented in table 1 and 2 as a comparison between
the values in 2001 and a 19 years period. F3 shows
the time series of tidal level changes in one year on
the location of Khamir Port.
Local model:
The entire marine area between Gheshm Island and
mainland, i.e., the coasts of Hormozgan Province, is
considered as the extent of local model (Fig. 5). To
investigate the changes in sea level and in flow
velocity three points have been selected in the area at
depth of 0 meter (table 3).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The general pattern of tidal flows in regional model is
represented in Fig. 4. When the regional model is
performed, the outputs of the model as the boundary
condition information are extracted to be applicable
for local model execution. It can also be stated that
rapid changes in wind direction in the area may have
influenced the characteristics of wind generated
waves (Sharifi et al., 2012).
Fig. 2: triangulation and bathymetry in regional model
Table 1: maximum and minimum of water level
Years Maximum Minimum Average
1997-2011 2.96 -0.33 1.61
2001 2.91 -0.25 1.60
Table 2: the percent frequency of water levels in 2001 and whole the 19 years
Water level <0.5 0.5-1 1-1.5 1.5-2 2-2.5 2.5-3
Frequency percent in 19 years 5.07 13.21 20.61 31.60 24.44 5.06
Frequency percent in year 2001 4.97 13.08 21.02 31.65 24.10 5.19
Int. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 4(1), 25-36, Winter & Spring, 2014
29
Fig. 3: one year time series of tidal levels in Chabahar Port
Fig. 4: the pattern of high tide and low tide flows in regional model
M. A. Nezammahalleh et al.
30
Fig. 5: the local model for modeling of tidal flows and the location of the study area
Fig. 6: the position of selected points to present the results of local model of tides
Three points have already been extracted at 0 meter
deep to investigate initially the behavior of changes in
water level and flow velocity. The coordinates of the
selected points are presented in Table 3.
Table 3: the coordinates of selected points in local model
Point Longitude (Degree) E Latitude (Degree) N
1 55.876929 26.991681
2 55.911621 27.003431
3 55.941408 27.014841
The water level and flow velocity variations due to
tides are represented in Fig.s 7 and 8 for the selected
points in two months. The quantitative values of
speed variation of tidal flows are represented in Table
4 and frequency percentage of water levels in one
selected point is also represented in Table 5. In order
to specify the symmetric and asymmetric flows of
tide in the port, with the purpose to find out the
influence of tidal flows in transportation of coastal
sediments, the flow roses in the selected points were
created (Fig. 9). The general pattern of tidal flows in
local model is illustrated in Fig. 9. According to
Sharifi et al. (2012) we can also argue that the results
of MIKE21are more reliable in shallow areas and in
deep areas it may have unreliable results.
Int. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 4(1), 25-36, Winter & Spring, 2014
31
Table 4: the characteristics of tidal flows in the selected points
Point Max. Level Min. level Average
level
Max. current speed
(m/s)
Average current speed
(m/s)
1 4.33 -0.11 2.25 1.06 0.54
2 4.35 -0.08 2.27 1.21 0.38
3 4.34 -0.06 2.27 1.12 0.42
Table 5: the frequency percentage of water level relative to C.D. in the selected point of 2
Water level <0.5 0.5-1 1-1.5 1.5-2 2-2.5 2.5-3 3-3.5 3.5-4 >4
Frequency percent of water
level in point 2 4.69 9.16 12.43 13.29 15.2 17.11 15.06 10.55 2.5
Fig. 7: time series of water level variations during two months at different points of the study area
Modeling of Hydrodynamic Factors for Management of Coastal Hazards
32
Fig. 8: flow velocity changes at the extracted points in the study area
Int. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 4(1), 25-36, Winter & Spring, 2014
33
Fig. 9: the flow roses at the selected points
Fig. 10: the pattern of flow in high tide (upper fig.) and low tide (lower fig.) in local model
M. A. Nezammahalleh et al.
34
The maximum extent of inundation by tides has been
ascertained for the area. According to the pattern of
tidal flows and based on the extents of increase and
decrease in the water level due to tides, it is possible
to detect the maximum advance of water onto the
coast in high tides. Figures of 11 and 12 show the
results of simulation of local model in different tidal
condition. The spatial advance of water towards the
coast is also shown in these two figures at different
times.
Fig. 11: the extent of inundation in the highest tide in the project area
Fig. 12: the extent of inundation in the lowest tide in the project area
Int. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 4(1), 25-36, Winter & Spring, 2014
35
To determine the maximum advance of water, due to
tide, onto the coast by the results of local model, the
maximum water level for each element has been
extracted. This indicates that in each given time
which element (areas of coastal land) is inundated by
the advance of water. (Fig. 13)
Fig. 13: the maximum water level occurred in each element of local model
CONCLUSION
The most important hydrodynamic factors that cause
coastline changes and advance of water onto the coast
in Persian Gulf have been recognized. These factors
include tidal fluctuations, wind setup, wave setup and
wave run up. These factors were also mentioned in
the studies of other researchers (Hubard and Dodd,
2002; Vose et al., 2007; Vousdoukas et al., 2009,
Modeling of Hydrodynamic Factors for Management of Coastal Hazards
36
Todd et al., 2009). Variations of water levels due to
tides are more examined in this research and the
maximum advance of water onto the coast was
modeled in tidal process on Khamir Port. Many of the
results have been verified by field surveys in the
study area. For the future studies, given the
methodology of the research, it is recommended to
execute modeling of the maximum advance of water
due to wind setup for the study area in different return
periods. The results of such a study may contribute to
determination of final advance of water and definition
of buffer for shoreline belt in the shore of Persian
Gulf.
REFERENCES
Gourlay M. R., (1992). Wave set-up, wave run-up
and beach water table: Interaction between surf
zone hydraulics and groundwater hydraulics.
Coastal Engineering 17, 93-144.
Johnston A., Slovinsky P., Yates K. L, (2014).
Assessing the vulnerability of coastal infrastructure
to sea level rise using multi-criteria analysis in
Scarborough, Maine (USA). Ocean & Coastal
Management 95, 176-188.
Leen De Vos, Peter Frigaard, Julien De Rouck,
(2007). Wave run-up on cylindrical and cone
shaped foundations for offshore wind turbines,
Coastal Engineering 54, 17–29.
Lykke Andersen T., Frigaard P., Damsgaard M.L., De
Vos L., (2011). Wave run-up on slender piles in
design conditions, Model tests and design rules for
offshore wind, Coastal Engineering 58, 281–289
Matthew E. Hubbard, Nick Dodd, (2002). A 2D
numerical model of wave run-up and overtopping,
Coastal Engineering 47 (2002) 1 –26.
Mikkel Fruergaard, Thorbjørn J. Andersen, Peter N.
Johannessen, Lars H. Nielsen, Morten ejrup,
(2012). Major coastal impact induced by a 1000-
year storm event, Scientific Reports 3, Article
number: 1051doi:10.1038/srep01051.
Mikkel Fruergaard, Thorbjørn J. Andersen, Peter N.
Johannessen, Lars H. Nielsen, Morten Pejrup,
(2013). Major coastal impact induced by a 1000-
year storm event, SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 3: 1051,
1-7.
Moeini M. H., Etemad-Shahidi A., (2007).
Application of two numerical models for wave
hindcasting in Lake Erie, Applied Ocean Research
29, 137–145.
Mojabi M.; Hejazi K.; Karimi M., (2013). Numerical
investigation of effective harbor geometry
parameters on sedimentation inside square harbors,
Int. J.MAr.Sci.Eng., 3, 57-68.
Nabil Touili, Juan Baztan, Jean-Paul Vanderlinden,
Idrissa Oumar Kane, Pedro Diaz-Simal, Luca
Pietrantoni, (2014). Public perception of
engineering-based coastal flooding and erosion risk
mitigation options: Lessons from three European
coastal settings; Coastal Engineering 87, 205-209.
Nezammahalleh, M. A., Yamani, M., Talebi, A.,
Pourhosseini, Z., and Alavipanah, S. K., (2013). A
NOVEL CRITERION FOR EARTHQUAKE RISK
ASSESSMENT, THE CASE OF BUSHEHR
CATASTROPHE IN APRIL 9, 2013. Int. Arch.
Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XL-
1/W3, 301-304.
Peduzzi P., Chatenoux B., Dao H., De Bono A.,
Herold C., Kossin J., Mouton F., Nordbeck O.,
(2012). Global trends in tropical cyclone risk,
Nature Climate Change 2, 289–294.
Peduzzi P., Chatenoux B., Dao H., De Bono A.,
Herold C., Kossin J., Mouton F., Nordbeck O.,
(2012). Global trends in tropical cyclone risk,
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE 2, 289-294.
Robins N. S., Pye K., Wallace H., (2013). Dynamic
coastal dune spit: the impact of morphological
change on dune slacks at Whiteford Burrows, South
Wales, UK. J Coast Conserv 4.
Sharifi F. S.; Ezam M.; Karami Khaniki A., (2012).
Evaluating the results of Hormuz strait wave
simulations using WAVEWATCH-III and
MIKE21-SW, Int. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2, 163-170
Sherman D. J., (2013). 10.1 Perspectives on Coastal
Geomorphology: Introduction, Treatise on
Geomorphology 10, Academic Press, 1.
Tabeshpour M. R.; Ataie Ashtiani BSeif.; M. S.;
Golafshani A. A., (2013). Hydrodynamic damped
pitch motion of tension leg platforms, Int.
J.MAr.Sci.Eng., 3, 91-98.
Todd L. Walton Jr., Robert G. Dean, (2009).
Landward limit of wind setup on beaches, Ocean
Engineering 36, 763-766.
Vousdoukas M.I., Velegrakis A.F., Dimou K.,
Zervakis V., Conley D.C., (2009). Wave run-up
observations in microtidal, sediment-starved pocket
beaches of the Eastern Mediterranean, Journal of
Marine Systems 78, S37–S47.
Zendegani A.; Narimannejad A.; MiriLavasani M. R;
Nasiri G., (2012). Safety assessment of offshore
structure, Int. J.Mar.Sci.Eng. 2, 239-248.
How to cite this article: (Harvard style)
Nezammahalleh, M. A *
.; Yamani, M.; Soltani, Sh.; Maldar Badeli, A.; Rastegar, A., (2014). Modeling of
Hydrodynamic Factors for Management of Coastal Hazards, Case Study: Khamir Port, Persian Gulf, Iran Int.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 4 (1), 25-36.