Upload
dinhquynh
View
232
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Lecture on Mobile P2P Computing
Prof. Maria PapadopouliUniversity of Crete
ICS-FORTHhttp://www.ics.forth.gr/mobile
Agenda
• Introduction on Mobile Computing & Wireless Networks• Wireless Networks - Physical Layer• IEEE 802.11 MAC• Wireless Network Measurements & Modeling • Location Sensing• Performance of VoIP over wireless networks• Mobile Peer-to-Peer computing • Exciting research problems
2
General Objectives
• Build some background on wireless networks, IEEE802.11, positioning, mobile computing
• Explore some research projects and possibly research collaborations
3
Environmental Monitoring
Source: Joao Da Silva’s talk at Enisa, July 20th, 2008
Tagged products
Source: Joao Da Silva’s talk at Enisa, July 20th, 2008
Source: Joao Da Silva’s talk at Enisa, July 20th, 2008
Source: Joao Da Silva’s talk at Enisa, July 20th, 2008
New networking paradigms for efficient search and sharing mechanisms
Source: Joao Da Silva’s talk at Enisa, July 20th, 2008
9
10
Fast Growth of Wireless Use• Social networking (e.g., micro-blogging)• Multimedia downloads (e.g., Hulu, YouTube)• Gaming (Xbox Live)• 2D video conferencing • File sharing & collaboration• Cloud storage
Next generation applications• Immersive video conferencing• 3D Telemedicine• Virtual & Augmented reality• Assistive Technology
Rapid increase in the multimedia mobile Internet traffic
Fast Growth of Wireless Use (2/2)
• Video driving rapid growth in mobile Internet traffic• Expected to rise 66x by 2013 (Cisco Visual
Networking Index-Mobile Data traffic Forecast)
11
12
Energy constrains
13
Wireless Internet via APs Data Access via Infostations Data Access using the Peer-to-Peer paradigm
Hybrid mobile information access (manifesting a combination of the above paradigms)
Paradigms of Mobile Information Access
14
Aims at “continuous” wireless Internet access broadly defined by three types networks:
Wireless wide area networks (WANs) Wireless local area networks (LANs) Wireless personal area networks (PANs)
Wireless Internet via APs
15
Infostations
• Wireless-enabled server attached to data repository• Wireless devices in range can query the infostation to acquire data• Can be – stand-alone servers – clustered with other infostations connected over terrerstrial links
16
Distributed system without any Centralized control Infrastructure
Distinguished by the following criteria Self-organization Autonomy Symmetry
Peer-to-Peer systems
Mobile Peer-to-Peer Computing
• When two devices (peers) are in wireless range of each other, they may share resources:– Share data– Network connection– Relay packets on behalf of each other
• Enable resource sharing among peers in a self-organizing, energy-efficient manner
Wireless Network via an Infrastructure
Router
Internet
User A User B
AP
Switch
Peer-to-Peer Paradigm
Server-to-Client ParadigmClient gets data from AP
User C
How does information diffuse in mobile peer-to-peer systems ?
Trapping model from particle-kinetics
Server-to-Client:
Applications Using Mobile P2P
• Location-based applications• Social networking application
For example: Facebook integrated with positioning, google maps, 7DS, photojournal
• User-centric access of the spectrum
19
Photojournal
• Sharing multimedia files with your friends• Mobile P2P paradigm• Superimpose multimedia information on google
maps by correlating the timestamps of multimedia files and recorded positioning information
• Review, share, search multimedia files across a (single-hop) network of friends
20
http://www.ics.forth.gr/mobile/
http://www.ics.forth.gr/mobile/
23
Research Issues on Cognitive Radios INFORTE Lecture Series
Prof. Maria PapadopouliUniversity of Crete
ICS-FORTHhttp://www.ics.forth.gr/mobile
Underutilization of licensed spectrum
• Licensed portions of the spectrum are underutilized.– According to FCC, only 5% of the spectrum from 30 MHz to 30
GHz is used in the US.
Cognitive radios
• Intelligent devices that can coexist with licensed users without affecting their quality of service– Licensed users have higher priority and are called primary users– Cognitive radios access the spectrum in an opportunistic way and are
called secondary users
• Networks of cognitive radios could function at licensed portions of the spectrum– Demand to access the ISM bands could be reduced
Coexistence of secondary users
• Usually, in cognitive radio networks, a large number of secondary users compete to access the spectrum
• A protocol should define the behavior of all these users such that the network’s performance is maximized
• Performance metrics:– Spectrum utilization– Fairness– Interference to primary users
Performance optimization• Proposed protocols in the literature define an
optimization problem– The utility function depends on the performance metrics
• Parameters of the problem are chosen from the following set:– Channel allocation– Adaptive modulation– Interference cancellation– Power control– Beamforming
Definition of the problem
1. Channel allocation• Problem formulation:
– 2 secondary users compete for access in the band [F1 F2].– The interference plus noise power as observed by the first user
is:
• Question: Which is the best way for this user to distribute its transmission power at the interval [F1 F2]?
Channel capacity
• According to Shannon the maximum rate that can be achieved in a channel is:
• S: signal power• N: interference plus noise power• B: width of the channel
• As the power that is introduced to a channel increases, the achievable rate increases more and more slowly.
NSBSR 1log)( 2
NSB
NNS
BdSSdR
12ln
1
1
12ln
)(
Energy investment in two channels
• We start by investing energy in the first channel until it’s total power becomes equal to N2.
• After that point, energy is divided equally among the two channels.
dsdR
dsdR
NB
NB
21
21
12ln
12ln
dsdR
dsdR
NB
PNB
21
211
12ln
12ln
Water filling strategy• The best way for a
user to invest it’s power is to distribute it in the whole range of frequencies.
Channel allocation problem
• M users compete to access a band– They do not use the selfish water filling strategy – Instead they cooperate and divide the spectrum among them in
the most efficient way
• The initial band is divided into a number of non overlapping frequency bins– An algorithm maps the bins to users in such a way that a global
utility function is maximized
Cooperation
Is it possible for the two users to achieve a better rate if they cooperate?
Example:
When R1’> R1 then dividing the bandwidth among the two users
is more effective than water filling.
)2
1log(22
1 NPPBR
)1log('1 N
PBR
Channel allocation algorithm
• There are various ways that a channel allocation algorithm could be designed.– Distributed or centralized.– Proactive or on demand.– Predetermined channel allocation.– Allocation of contiguous or non contiguous bins to devices.
Primary and secondary channels
• Channels that are allocated to a user are called primary
• Channels that a user borrows from the neighborhood are called secondary
• Predetermined channel allocation is not so suitable for cognitive radio networks, duo to:– Changes of channel conditions caused by primary user activity– Network topology changes very often
User-centric Spectrum Sharing
• Spectrum is a valuable resource! Improve its spectrum utilization• Primary users “sub-lease” part of spectrum• Secondary users take advantage of the unused
spectrum• Different algorithms for bin allocation across
secondary and primary users
37