5
MMDA VS. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY – 10 AGENCIES WARE ORDERED TO RESTORE AND PRESERVE WATER QUALITY TO SB LEVEL.

MMDA VS. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY

  • Upload
    lorene

  • View
    95

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

MMDA VS. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY. – 10 AGENCIES WARE ORDERED TO RESTORE AND PRESERVE WATER QUALITY TO SB LEVEL. RULE OF PROCEDURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CASES RULE 8 – Continuing mandamus against government agency or official. Unlawful neglect in performance of legal duty. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: MMDA VS.  CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY

MMDAVS.

CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY

– 10 AGENCIES WARE ORDERED TO RESTORE AND PRESERVE WATER QUALITY TO SB LEVEL.

Page 2: MMDA VS.  CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY

RULE OF PROCEDURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CASES

RULE 8 – Continuing mandamus against government agency or official

a. Unlawful neglect in performance of legal duty.

b. Unlawful exclusion from enjoyment of legal rights.

• Judgment is effective until full satisfaction.

Page 3: MMDA VS.  CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY

FEATURES OF RULE ON CONTINUING MANDAMUS.

a. No docket fees.b. Liberal rule on locus standi.c. Filed with Court of Appeals or Supreme

Court.d. TEPOe. Summary proceeding.

Page 4: MMDA VS.  CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY

FEATURES OF RULE ON CONTINUING MANDAMUS.

f. Case decided within 60 days.g. Periodic reports required.h. Execution through government agency or

Commissioner.i. Suitor allowed to submit comments on

return writ.

Page 5: MMDA VS.  CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY

CONTINUING MANDAMUS

• – Effective tool to ensure full execution of decision.