Upload
mathew-netherton
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM
FUNDING FORMULA(MAEP)
AN OVERVIEW OF HOW THE FORMULA WORKS
The formula used to establish adequate current operation funding levels necessary for the programs of each school district to meet at least a “C” district on an accountability scale of A - F districts (Level III - Successful) as established by the State Board of Education regardless of the school district’s geographic location.
WHAT IS MAEP?
2
PURPOSE
3
Ensure that every Mississippi Child regardless of where he/she lives is afforded an adequate educational opportunity, as defined by the State Accountability System. In order to accomplish this the system must: Provide equity by recognizing differences in the ability to provide
resources locally (EQUITY).
Provide a level of resources necessary for an adequate education (ADEQUACY).
MAEP FUNDING FORMULA
4
1. ADA x Base Student Cost + At-Risk Component - Local Contribution + 8% Guarantee = MAEP Formula Allocation.
2. MAEP Formula Allocation + Add-On Programs = Total MAEP District Funding.
MAEP FORMULA PIECES
5
Base Student Cost
Local Contribution
Hig
h G
row
th
BASE STUDENT COST (BSC) CALCULATION
6
DISTRICT SELECTION PROCESS
Districts determined to be successful and efficient in four areas of school operations are selected for determining the base student cost.
Successful – Defined by the State Board of Education using current statistically relevant state assessment data.
BSC CALCULATION
7
DISTRICT SELECTION PROCESS
Efficient - In each of the following Efficiency Components the statistical mean for all school districts is determined. 1. Instruction – Teachers per 1,000 students2. Administration – Administrator/Staff ratio3. Maintenance and Operations
a) M&O spending per 100,000 square feet b) Maintenance staff per 100,000 square
feet4. Ancillary – Librarians and Counselors per 1,000
students
BSC CALCULATION
8
DIST NAME
SUCCESSFUL
DISTRICT
INSTRUCTIONAL
COST EFF ANCILLARY COST EFF
PLANT AND
MAINTENANCE COST EFF
ADMINISTRATIVE
COST EFF
7XXX District 11 Y X X X X
7XXX District 12 Y X
7XXX District 13 N
7XXX District 14 Y X X
7XXX District 15 N
BSC CALCULATION
9
Districts that are one standard deviation
above and two standard deviations below the mean (average) for each component are considered efficient.
Districts that are both successful and efficient are used to calculate the average cost for each component.
BSC CALCULATION
10
Teachers per 1000 Students
DIST NAME ADA mo 1-9 ADA/1000
FTE Classroom Teachers
Teachers per 1000 students
7XXX District 11 2,539.88 2.54 198.06 77.98 X
7XXX District 12 562.33 0.56 45.30 80.56 X
7XXX District 13 663.57 0.66 58.89 88.74
7XXX District 14 1,609.39 1.61 115.60 71.83 X
7XXX District 15 2,348.55 2.35 149.22 63.54 X
TOTAL 453,867.74 453.87 32,312.29 74.02
Mean 74.02
Standard Dev 7.88
1 SD above 81.90
2 SD below 58.25
BSC CALCULATION
11
The average cost for each component is calculated using expenditure data from the second preceding year.
For the FY15 calculation, FY13 expenditure data was used.
BSC CALCULATION
12
MS Code 37-151-7 details what costs are included for each cost component.
Instructional Cost ComponentFor the instructional cost component, the Department of Education
shall select districts that have been identified as instructionally successful and have a ratio of a number of teachers per one thousand students that is between one standard deviation above the mean and two standard deviations below the mean of the statewide average of teachers per one thousand students. The instructional cost component shall be calculated by dividing latest available months 1-9 ADA into the instructional expenditures of these selected districts.
BSC CALCULATION
13
MS Code 37-151-7:For the purpose of this calculation, the Department of education shall use the following funds, functions, and objects:
Instructional Cost Component FUND FUNCTION OBJECT 1120 1110-1199 100-999 1120 1210, 1220, 2150-2159 210 & 215 1130 ALL 210 & 215 2001 1110-1199 100-999 2070 1110-1199 100-999 2420 1110-1199 100-999 2711 ALL 210 & 215
BSC CALCULATION
14
DIST NAME
SUCCESS DISTRICT
INSTRUC COST EFF
SUCCESS & EFFECIENT ADA INSTRUC COST
7XXX District 11 Y X Y 2,539.88 $11,667,398.00
7XXX District 12 Y X Y 562.33 $7,936,963.09
7XXX District 13 N $0.00
7XXX District 14 Y X Y 1,609.39 $5,128,662.13
7XXX District 15 N $0.00
TOTAL 90,000.00 $270,000,000.00
For BSC: $3,000.00
Instructional Cost Component
BSC CALCULATION
15
THE AVERAGE COST OF THE FOUR COMPONENTS ARE ADDED TOGETHER TO OBTAIN THE BASE STUDENT COST
INSTRUCTION $ 3,007.22
ADMINISTRATION 1,003.34
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE OF PLANT
778.77
ANCILLARY SUPPORT 301.18
ADJUSTMENTS FOR PAY RAISE, INSURANCE &
RETIREMENT INCREASES0.00
FY ’11 BASE STUDENT COST $ 5,140.07
FY15 BASE STUDENT COST-REVISED ESTIMATE
BSC CALCULATION
16
To provide stability for appropriation and budgeting purposes, the base student cost will be calculated every four years rather than each year. (In FY11 and FY15)
An inflation component of 40% of the base student cost times the current CPI is added to the previous year’s Base Student Cost to arrive at the new Base Student Cost during years between a complete recalculation.
BSC CALCULATION
17
Example – FY 2014 MAEP Base Student Cost was calculated as follows:
FY 13 BSC X 40% X CPI = FY 13 Inflation Component
$5,017.94 X .40 X .0217 = $43.56
FY 14 Base Student Cost is:
$5,017.94 + $43.56 + $42.49(PERS) = $5,103.99
$5,103.99 + $51.20(more PERS) = $5,155.19
MAEP FORMULA ALLOCATION PROCESS
18
Allocation of MAEP formula dollars to local school districts is determined as follows:
ADA (months 2 and 3 of school year prior to fiscal year appropriation) x Base Student Cost + At-risk Component - Local Contribution + 8 % Guarantee = MAEP District Allocation.
MAEP FORMULA ALLOCATION PROCESS
19
AVERAGE DAILY ATTENDANCE
Grades K-12 Months 2 and 3 Of Preceding Year.
Excludes self-contained Special Education ADA.
MAEP FORMULA ALLOCATION PROCESS
20
High Growth Component - For any district that has positive growth in ADA each year over the 3-year period prior to the appropriation, the average percent of growth in ADA over those 3 years is multiplied times the most recent months 2 and 3 ADA and the result is added back to the ADA for that district.
MAEP FORMULA ALLOCATION PROCESS
21
High Growth Example from FY14
FY10 ADA (mo 2&3)
FY11 ADA (mo 2&3)
FY12 ADA (mo 2&3)
FY13 ADA (mo 2&3)
1,971.76 2,024.23 2,137.35 2,242.71
% increase % increase % increase Average increase
2.6609% 5.5883% 4.9295% 4.3929%
Average increase FY13 ADA (mo 2&3)
Additional ADAFor High Growth
FY13 ADATo use in calc
4.3929% 2,242.71 98.52 2,341.23
MAEP FORMULA ALLOCATION PROCESS
22
AT-RISK COMPONENT
5% of the base student cost multiplied by the number of free lunch participants on November 30 of preceding year.
The resulting dollar amount is added to MAEP formula allocation prior to the calculation of local contribution.
MAEP FORMULA ALLOCATION PROCESS
23
LOCAL CONTRIBUTION
Uses 2nd Preceding Year’s DataYield From 28 Mills + Ad Valorem In Lieu
PaymentsCapped at 27% of the MAEP Formula Cost
Including the At-Risk Component
MAEP FORMULA ALLOCATION PROCESS
24
50,000,000 Gross Assessed Value
3,000,000 Exempt Value Over 65
200,000 Homestead Exemption Credit Under 65
150,000 Homestead Exemption Reimbursement
500,000 In Lieu Revenue
= (50,000,000 - 3,000,000) * .028 - 200,000 + 150,000 + 500,000
= $1,766,000 Value of 28 mills
1,000 ADA
$ 5,000 BSC
950 # Free Lunch
= (1,000 * 5,000) + (5,000 * .05 * 950)
= 5,237,500 Formula amount including At-Risk
= $1,414,125 27% of formula amount including At-Risk
= $1,414,125 Lesser of 28 Mills or 27%
MAEP FORMULA ALLOCATION PROCESS
25
8% GUARANTEE
Incorporated to ensure that a district receives a formula allocation equal to at least what they received in FY2002 for funding programs replaced by MAEP (Minimum Program, Equity Funding, Uniform Millage Assistance) plus 8%.
ADD-ON PROGRAM FUNDING
26
ADD-ON PROGRAMS CONSIST OF:
1. Special Education
2. Gifted Education
3. Vocational Education
4. Alternative Education
5. Transportation
27
Questions?