MINUTES OF MEETING 439 Heritage Council of NSW...Minutes of Heritage Council of NSW Meeting – 1 March 2017 Page 4 of 15 b. the Grants Committee [s advice being sought where a Major

MINUTES OF MEETING – 439 Heritage Council of NSW

1 March 2017 Commencing at 9:08 am

Office of Environment and Heritage Level 6, 10 Valentine Ave

Parramatta

MEMBERS PRESENT Mr Stephen Davies (Chair) Dr Mark Dunn (Deputy Chair) Dr Deborah Dearing Dr Raymond Kelly Ms Jennifer Davis Ms Jane Irwin Prof Gary Sturgess AM Ms Lisa Newell (National Trust of NSW, Nominee) Mr Gary White (for Secretary, Department of Planning & Environment) Mr Bruce Pettman (Observer, Government Architect)

HERITAGE DIVISION ATTENDEES Ms Pauline McKenzie – Executive Director, Heritage Division Mr Nigel Routh – Director, Heritage Strategy Mr Rajeev Maini – A/Manager, Conservation Ms Katrina Stankowski – A/Manager, Listings Division staff: Dr Siobhan Lavelle OAM, Ms Sarah Jane Brazil, Mr David Nix. HERITAGE COUNCIL SECRETARIAT Ms Sarah Paddington Mrs Colleen Klingberg

APOLOGIES Mr Peter Poulet (Observer, Government Architect)

GUEST PRESENTERS Ms Sheridan Burke, A/Chair Heritage Council Grants Committee Ms Cath Renwick, Parramatta City Council (Item 2.2) Mr Robin White, Thylacine (Item 2.2) Mr Robert Gasparini, Design 5 Architects, (Item 2.2) OEH staff: Dr Caroline Ford, Ms Julia Dowling, Ms Victoria Nolan (Item 2.3)

Agenda Items

1.0 Opening and Welcome

The meeting commenced at 9:08 am.

The Chair, Mr Stephen Davies, delivered an Acknowledgment of Country.

1.1 Apologies, Confirmation and Timing of Agenda

Discussion Members noted no apologies were received prior to the meeting, and Ms Lisa Newell and Mr Gary

White had advised they had been delayed.

The Chair welcomed and congratulated Mr Nigel Routh, the newly appointed Director of Heritage

Strategy to the meeting and noted the Council looked forward to working together.

Members noted three external presentations were scheduled for the day, and that copies of

annexures H & I had been tabled on the day to complement the paper for Item 2.1 – Heritage Grants

Program.

Minutes of Heritage Council of NSW Meeting – 1 March 2017 Page 2 of 15

Noted The Heritage Council of NSW noted the welcome, member’s apologies, the papers tabled and

confirmed the agenda.

1.3 Declarations of Interest

Discussion Members were advised of the following declarations prior to the meeting.

Ms Jane Irwin – Item 6.2 Recommendation to List - Gledswood Curtilage Amendment.

Additional declarations of interest identified and advised during the meeting:

Dr Raymond Kelly – Item 2.1 Heritage Grants Program – member of Awabakal Local Aboriginal

Land Council, grant applicant.

Noted The Heritage Council of NSW noted the declarations of interest.

2.0 Confirmation of Minutes

2.1 Heritage Council of NSW Meeting of 1 February 2017

Discussion Members discussed the draft minutes of the 1 February 2017 Heritage Council meeting.

Resolution 2017-7. The Heritage Council of NSW:

1. Accept the minutes with amendments as a true record of the Heritage Council meeting

held on 1 February 2017.

Moved by Prof Gary Sturgess and seconded by Ms Jennifer Davis.

2.2 Heritage Council Month Out of Session Decisions

Noted Members noted no matters had been determined by the Heritage Council of NSW out of session in

February 2017.

2.0 Presentation

2.1 Heritage Grants program recommendations for 2017-18 and 2017-19

Presentation Ms Jan Nye, Team Leader for Heritage Grants provided a brief overview of the results arising from the

internal assessment of the grant applications and assessment by the Heritage Grants committee at its

meeting on the 3 February 2017. Ms Nye advised:

Ms Sheridan Burke, is one of five members of the newly formed Grants Committee. Ms Burke

Chaired the inaugural Grants Committee meeting which was responsible for making the

recommendations on the major works applications, and will speak to the Council about those

applications.

the Minister has approved the 2017-18 to 2018-19 NSW Heritage Grants program as

recommended by the Heritage Council.

303 applications were received at the advertised funding round between 26 October and 12

December 2016, and fall within seven funding streams.

Sixteen internal Heritage Division assessors reviewed the applications, which included:

– assessment against eligibility criteria

– an assessment of the appropriateness of the proposals for the item and Heritage Act

approvals required


– review and scoring applications against the strategic priorities for each stream and advice

on funding levels and conditions of approval.

For the major works funding stream, the expertise of the Grants Committee was utilised to

consider the merits of applications and to rank them based on the strategic priorities and provide

recommendations on funding levels and conditions of approval.

That an adjustment was required to the table at attachment B - Summary of applications received

and final recommendations to reflect final amounts to be recommended for approval under the

Local Government Heritage Advisors and Local Heritage Places streams.

The streams considered were discussed as members reviewed the tables of which applications

had been classified as eligible, ineligible and those that were put forward for receiving grants.

Discussion The members:

asked about the process that had been applied for assessing the applications, including the scoring

system applied, noting that it had been a robust approach.

discussed the recommendations within each of the available funding streams.

supported the recommendations in attachments B (amended), C, D, F, G, H, I and J of the paper.

noted the Community Heritage application recommendations and the nature of applications 5, 6,

7 and 8. The members sought additional detail of the status of the applications and the intended

outputs/outcomes – and sought the Heritage Division to provide additional information for

members to consider and make a determination out of session.

noted the need for the studies to be reviewed and evaluated to ensure funding was actually

achieving desired outcomes that aligned with the Heritage Council’s strategic goals.

agreed the grants process would form part of the Heritage Council Business Planning day agenda.

agreed the members would consider this matter in an Out of Session decision.


1. request the Heritage Division have applications 5, 6, 7 and 8 under the community grants

program reviewed (Attachment E) and provide recommendations for members to

determine out of session by 20 March.

2. request review of Local Government Program is carried out prior to the commencement

of any future 2 year program process.

3. request Terms of Reference and a project plan be prepared for review at an upcoming

meeting.

4. endorse the recommendations within Attachments B, C, D, F, G, H, I and J of the paper

and Attachment E (as amended on the 17 March 2017).

5. agree to recommend to the Minister that there be a variation to the level of funds

allocated to each stream as identified in Attachment B (as corrected on the 17 March

2017).

6. agree to the recommendations contained in Attachments D, F, and G of the paper and

Attachment E (as amended on the 17 March 2017) be provided to the Minister for

determination.

7. agree the recommendations contained in Attachments H to J be provided to the

Minister’s delegate for determination.

8. agree to recommend to the Minister that if an applicant does not accept an offer of

funding that the Executive Director, Heritage Division and the Director, Heritage Strategy

be given delegation to approve an eligible replacement project(s), from any stream as

deemed appropriate, of similar value to utilise any uncommitted funds, subject to:

a. there being sufficient time for the project to be implemented and


b. the Grants Committee’s advice being sought where a Major Works project is

being considered for funding.

Moved by Ms Lisa Newell and seconded by Prof Gary Sturgess.

Action Heritage Division with the assistance of Heritage Grants Committee to review Community Heritage –

Peak organisations program applications 5, 6, 7 and 8 for members to determine out of session.

2.2 Lennox Bridge Portal Parramatta: Interpretation Concept (SHR #00750)

Presentation The guest presenters provided background and an explanation to each of their slides in their visual

presentation.

Discussion The members:

sought clarification on whether the style proposed for the item would be used throughout

Parramatta. It was noted that the interpretation would respond to the item rather than a theme

applied throughout the Council area.

noted the concepts were good, but asked the presenters to consider balancing the need for ‘less is

more’ with their proposed features, information and implementation.

discussed the opportunities to view the fabric of the item, and whether exposure of the 3rd wall,

risked the integrity/viability of the original fabric.

discussed the stories to be told with the bridge and the history and contemporary perspectives.

noted the construction of the interpretation was designed to be flood resistant and protect the

structure, by allowing it to air.

agreed that clear linkages throughout Parramatta’s heritage is important to ensure a consistent

and connected story of Parramatta.

noted the work that has been done since the last presentation and acknowledge the

improvements that have been made in that time.


1. support and commend the three pronged approach to interpretation in the Lennox Bridge

precinct and the proposed interpretation concept for the Lennox Bridge Portals

interpretation.

2. advise the City of Parramatta Council that simplification of the portal proposal would be

beneficial.

3. advise the City of Parramatta Council that the Heritage Council will provide further

comment/approval of the final Lennox Bridge Interpretation Plan once it is formally

submitted in compliance of Condition 16 of Application 2013/S60/44.

Moved by Ms Jane Irwin and seconded by Dr Deborah Dearing.

2.3 Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Reform

Presentation The guest presenters provided background and an explanation to each of their slides in their visual

presentation.

Discussion The members discussed:

the feasibility of the options proposed, including which options would work currently, and which

ones would be integrated over time as the system and roles became better established.


acknowledging and ensuring the intended principles truly recognised Aboriginal cultural authority

in the reform, and each of the individual processes created by the reforms.

the legal, policy, process and outcome implications of the presentation

the importance of ensuring outcomes were high quality by including clear systems for ensuring

that any nominations seeking protection were complete, accurate and well researched.

the level of work required to prepare for the reform, both in terms of the draft Bill, and the

implementation and transition phases of the reforms..

it was acknowledged that further details are required before the Heritage Council would be

confident to confirm which option was preferred, but did support the principles of Option 2 based

on the information at hand.

Resolution

Action

2017-10. The Heritage Council of NSW:

1. support option 2 for the State Heritage Register listings and approvals.

Moved by Ms Lisa Newell and seconded by Ms Jenny Davis.

Further details will be provided in the May Heritage Council meeting.

3.0 Reports

3.1 Executive Director’s Report

Discussion Ms Pauline McKenzie provided additional updates to her report.

Moon Rock Aboriginal Place was celebrated on the 20 February.

– Dr Deborah Dearing attended as a representative of the Heritage Council. The event was enormously successful with opportunities to discuss the values of the place with the local community.

Robb College CMP has been sent in and is being reviewed, with slight amendments required for it

to be ready for the Heritage Council’s April meeting.

The Heritage Division transition was progressing, with some recent changes. Updates would

continue to be provided to the Council.

The Macquarie Street Strategic Framework report had been received the previous day and was

distributed to members electronically, with strict confidentiality requirements.

Noted The Heritage Council of NSW noted the report.

3.2 Chair’s Report

Discussion The Chair reported to members:

requests have been made to the Heritage Council to consider the heritage impacts from the

proposed Newcastle Supercar. It was noted formal submissions on this proposal would be open on

the 9 to 31 March 2017, and the public would be encouraged to lodge their submissions.

Sydney Living Museums (SLM)– request from Cumberland Council administrator in regards to the

management of Linwood and possible support from SLM. Chair and Executive Director Heritage

met with SLM to discuss what assistance they could provide in future management of a site.

the outcomes from the meeting about Sydney Opera House included:

– Sydney Opera House will provide a high-level program for upcoming approvals, identifying key milestones.

– Establish a Heritage Division-Sydney Opera House working group and lock-in sessions for approvals.


– Sydney Opera House are taking on board recent comments raised by the World Heritage Office and UNESCO.

– All other works apart from the Joan Sutherland Theatre and associated works are to be deferred at this time so SOH can focus on the JST works.

A site visit is being organised for White Bay. The invitation will be extended to all members.

The Heritage Division has created a system for managing matters that proponents raise directly with the Chair instead of contacting the Division. Any other members being approached on matters should let the Division know to avoid proponents lobbying individuals and ensure better communication and consistency.

We’re delighted to hear that ACHAC will share the regional visit. To support the smooth organisation of this, members are to confirm their attendance in the next week. A draft itinerary will be developed for members consideration in the next month of two.

Noted The Heritage Council of NSW noted the report.

3.2.1 Decisions Exercising the Authority of the Chair

No matters were determined by the Chair in February 2017.

3.3 Major Planning Matters Monthly Update

Discussion Mr Gary White provided additional updates to his report.

Draw members attention to the continuing review of the planning legislation. There are

opportunities for the Heritage Council to consider the proposed legislation and ensure heritage is

integrated within the strategic planning to guide the future development of NSW. The exhibition

period closes at the end of March.

For members to be aware of a review of the standard planning instrument, noting this will not

apply for all areas of NSW.

Noted The Heritage Council of NSW noted the report and update.

Action Heritage Division will distribute information to members, and Ms Lisa Newell will assist with

formulating a submission before the closing date.

4.0 Conservation Matters

4.1 Sydney Opera House: draft Outdoor Events & Activities Heritage Guidelines

Presentation

Discussion

The Sydney Opera House (SOH) presented a 3D model of the SOH and external areas around the site.

The members asked for the 3D modelling to illustrate primary view locations around the site to

ascertain the impact proposed events and associated event infrastructure will have on views to the

site.

Following the 3D presentation, members discussed with Ms Sarah Jane Brazil and Mr David Nix and:

noted that the guidelines do not locate an event infrastructure zone on the northern broadwalk.

This could lead to event infrastructure being located anywhere within the northern broadwalk

area. All members agreed that both the height and footprint of structures should be set and

agreed to by the SOH.

asked if multiple events would occur at the same time, and whether the number of events was

capped or open. Members agreed the number of events should be limited.


noted the subcommittee would consider the revised version of the guideline once amended, and

use the Heritage Council advice to guide any further advice.


1. note the information in the paper.

2. endorse the draft Sydney Opera House Outdoor Events and Activities Heritage Guidelines,

subject to the following amendments being made to the satisfaction of the Executive

Director, Heritage Division, OEH:

a. The guidelines to clearly state that its purpose is to maintain the SOH’s significant

values, particularly the views and vistas, by identifying event infrastructure free

areas, which views that will remain unobstructed, and outlines event free days.

b. The guidelines should either be integrated into the overarching Outdoor Event

Guide 2015 or be cross referenced into each of the connected documents

including the SOH Noise Management Plan.

c. 3D perspective images should be included within the guidelines that locate the

infrastructure zones, including maximum heights in relation to the identified

approach views to better illustrate visual impacts.

d. The Guidelines should clarify the type of infrastructure permitted within the Zone

2.

e. Additional 3D perspective images should be prepared for Event Infrastructure

Zone 3 & 4.

f. An event infrastructure zone should be identified for the northern broadwalk

which is restricted in footprint and the proposed maximum height limit of 8

metres should be substantially reduced.

Moved by Ms Jenny Davis and seconded by Mr Stephen Davies.

4.2 Sydney Opera House: Events s60 application

Discussion The members discussed with Ms Sarah Jane Brazil and Mr David Nix.

This s.60 application relates to forecourt and monumental steps events.

The application does not include events on northern broadwalk.

Event days are to be reduced to 99 days via this application

Duration of three events extended from 11 days to 20 days.

Table provided by Sydney Opera House (SOH) shows outdoor events staged at the SOH over the

past 10 years have not exceeded the allowable event days.

The need for a Kit of Parts to mitigate against impacts of event infrastructure.

The Chair acknowledged and complimented Mr David Nix’s work on all of the Sydney Opera House

matters.


1. Recognising the appropriateness of staging outdoor events, request the SOH to provide a

timeframe for the implementation of the Kit of Parts and Outdoor Events & Activities

Heritage Guidelines to ensure that events respect the significance of SOH.

2. It is recommended that this Section 60 application is approved under section 63 of the

Heritage Act 1977, subject to the following conditions:

1. TEMPORARY STRUCTURES


a) Infrastructure associated with any event or activity should be designed and sited to minimise intrusion into primary view lines on the southern approach to the site and to maximise public access to the Forecourt and Monumental Steps;

b) All structures, containers, scaffold towers and the like should be covered in a suitable screening material with appropriate graphics or artwork that reduces their visual impact and does not detract from or compete with the Opera House itself.

c) No infrastructure element should be highly reflective, white or off-white, but a more neutral colour that does not compete with the Opera House shells or Podium;

d) Potentially intrusive items, or those that inhibit public access should be installed at the last possible opportunity and removed as soon as possible and practicable after the event.

e) All event infrastructure and installations, including fencing and signage, should be of high quality design and execution that does not diminish or detract from the setting and presentation of this World Heritage Listed site.

f) Stage, rear and side-stage trucks and props, when not in use and between blocks of performances should, where possible, be moved to the eastern end of the monumental steps to minimise visual intrusion and to maximise public access to these steps.

Reason: To ensure that events and associated infrastructure do not have an unacceptable impact on the heritage significance of the Sydney Opera House.

2. SITE PROTECTION & WORKS

a) Significant building fabric and elements are to be protected during the works from potential damage. Protection systems must ensure significant fabric is not damaged or removed.

Reason: To ensure event infrastructure does not have an unacceptable impact on the significance fabric of the Sydney Opera House.

3. TIME LIMIT FOR APPROVAL

a) This approval is for a period of 5 years.

b) Subsequent approvals for the number and type of outdoor events shall be based on a review of the impacts on the heritage significance during this period.

c) The Sydney Opera House Trust is to provide an annual report to the Heritage Council of NSW on outdoor events to assist in this review.

d) The report is to include the dates of events, their purpose, their specific location, and description and location of temporary structures associated with the event. The report should include visual representation of the information requested.

Reason: To provide the opportunity to assess the impacts of temporary events on the heritage values of the SOH.

4. UPDATE OF GUIDELINES

a) The outdoor events to be held at the Sydney Opera House and associated structures shall be in accordance with The Sydney Opera House Outdoor Events & Activities Heritage Guidelines as endorsed by the Heritage Council.

Reason: To ensure that such events do not have an unacceptable impact on the heritage significance of the Sydney Opera House including visual impact. Moved by Mr Stephen Davies and seconded by Ms Jennifer Davis.

4.3 Millers Point Conservation Area Planning Proposal: Sydney LEP

Discussion The paper was taken as read and members endorsed the recommendation provided in the paper.

It was noted the delegations for the City of Sydney will be presented at the next meeting.



1. note the information in the presented paper.

2. provide the following comments to the City of Sydney:

a. The City of Sydney is commended for the extensive work carried out to address

the Heritage Council’s request to amend the planning controls to protect the

heritage of Millers Point.

b. The proposed amendments to the Millers Point height and floor space controls in

the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 are supported because the

amendments protect the heritage significance of Millers Point by ensuring that

the existing built form and scale is retained with appropriate new development

that is sympathetic to the heritage item and conservation area.

c. The proposed controls will align decisions under the Environmental Planning and

Assessment Act 1979 and the Heritage Act 1977 by making endorsed

Conservation Management Plans a matter for consideration during the

assessment process for the City of Sydney.

d. The draft amendments to the Development Control Plan are supported. The

proposed updates to the Millers Point locality statement and supporting principles

will provide additional guidance for development proposals and the retention of

the character and built form of the Millers Point Conservation Area.

e. The Heritage Council and Heritage Division appreciates the ongoing

communication and updates from the City of Sydney and looks forward to the

adoption of the planning proposal and draft Development Control Plan.

Moved by Ms Jane Irwin and seconded by Dr Deborah Dearing.

5.0 Legislative, Policy and Administrative Matters for Consideration & Decision

5.1 Sydney Water Delegations



1. note the information in the presented paper.

2. in accordance with section 169(3) of the Heritage Act 1977,

a. agrees to delegate certain functions of the Heritage Council to the Authority, on

the terms set out in Attachment B of the paper, to the

i. Head of Integrated Systems Planning, Sydney Water; and the

ii. General Manager Liveable City Solutions, Sydney Water.

b. agrees that the revised delegation at Attachment B of the paper will repeal and

replace the previous delegation of Heritage Council functions to the Authority

from May 2013.

3. seek the consent of the Minister for this revised delegation.

Moved by Dr Deborah Dearing and seconded by Ms Lisa Newell.

6.0 Listing Matters for Consideration & Decision

6.1 Recommendation to List - Roxy Theatre and Peter's Greek Café Complex, Bingara (Gwydir Council)




1. in accordance with section 33(1)(d) of the Heritage Act 1977 advise the Minister that the

item known as “The Roxy Theatre and Peter’s Café complex” at 74 Maitland Street,

Bingara, is of state heritage significance, as shown in the plan at Annexure B of the paper

and Annexure A of these minutes.

2. recommend to the Minister, in accordance with sections 32(1) and (2) of the Heritage Act

1977, that the Minister direct the listing of the item, “The Roxy Theatre and Peter’s Café

complex” at 74 Maitland Street, Bingara, on the State Heritage Register.

3. in accordance with section 33(1)(e) of the Heritage Act 1977, give notice of its decision to

persons notified under section 33(1)(a).

4. in accordance with section 57(2) of the Heritage Act 1977, in accordance with section

57(2) of the Heritage Act 1977, recommend that the Minister grant the site specific

exemptions at Annexure C of the paper from section 57(1) as well as the Heritage

Council’s Standard Exemptions.

Moved by Dr Mark Dunn and seconded by Prof Gary Sturgess.

6.2 Recommendation to List - Gledswood Curtilage Amendment, Gledswood Hills (Camden Council)

Discussion Members discussed Ms Irwin’s declaration, and it was agreed she should stay for the discussion.

The paper was taken as read and all members endorsed the recommendation in the paper.


1. in accordance with section 33(1)(d) of the Heritage Act 1977 advise the Minister that the

item known as Gledswood at 900 Camden Valley Way, Gledswood Hills, is of state

heritage significance, as shown in the plan at Annexure B of the paper and Annexure B of

these minutes.

2. recommend to the Minister, in accordance with sections 32(1) and (2) of the Heritage Act

1977, that the Minister direct the curtilage reduction of the item, “Gledswood” at 900

Camden Valley Way, Gledswood Hills by the removal of Lot 1203, DP1187381.

3. in accordance with section 33(1)(e) of the Heritage Act 1977, give notice of its decision to

persons notified under section 33(1)(a).

4. in accordance with section 57(2) of the Heritage Act 1977, note that the Heritage Council

Standard Exemptions will apply to the land retained within the State Heritage Register

Listing No.1692 for Gledswood (Lots 1201 and 1202, DP1187381).

Moved by Dr Mark Dunn and seconded by Prof Gary Sturgess.

6.3 Governors Domain and Civic Precinct National Listing - Heritage Council Letter of Response (City of

Sydney Council)

Discussion The paper was taken as read and all members endorsed the recommendation in the paper.


1. note the presented paper and accompanying response to the proposed National listing for

the Governor’s Domain and Civic Precinct.

2. provide any comments or amendments to the response to the Heritage Division by 8

March for submission to the Australian Heritage Council by 13 March 2017.

Moved by Mr Stephen Davies and seconded by Ms Lisa Newell.


Action Heritage Division to collate members’ comments or amendments to the response for submission to

the Australian Heritage Council by 13 March 2017.

6.4 State Heritage Register Committee Delegations

Discussion The paper was taken as read and all members endorsed the recommendation in the paper.


1. approve the proposal that the State Heritage Register Committee should exercise their

existing delegation, held under Section 169(3) of the NSW Heritage Act 1977 (the Act), to

make Recommendations for Listing to the Minister for Heritage under Section 32 of the

Act.

2. direct that this delegation must only be exercised by the State Heritage Register

Committee in regard to non-contentious Listings.

3. direct that contentious Listings such as high profile items or places where significance is

contested will continue to be determined by the Heritage Council of NSW.

Moved by Dr Deborah Dearing and seconded by Mr Gary White.

7.0 Monthly reporting

7.1 Heritage Council Action Report

Discussion Members noted the report. It was noted the Sydney Orbital Project, including Clydesdale, is

progressing slowly.

7.2 Conservation matters approved under delegation

Discussion Members noted the report.

7.3 Listing matters


7.4 Grant matters


7.5 Heritage compliance

Discussion Members noted the report. A report will come to the April meeting, which is a review of last 12

months and suggested key performance indicators.

7.6 Conservation major projects status


7.7 Port Macquarie archaeology project


7.8 Hillview: Funding and project

Discussion Members noted the report. Ms Sarah Jane Brazil updated members, noting that the engagement of

property management services are currently being pursued to manage compliance with lease terms

and ensure the ongoing conservation and management of the site.


Members reviewed the action plan and supported the pathway proposed.

8.0 Committee and sub committee updates

8.1 Heritage Council committee updates

Discussion Members noted the reports for each committee meeting.

Members supported the Heritage Division investigating a range of options discussed by the

Community and Engagement Committee for the 40th anniversary, including:

Talk series, high profile speakers, a publication, and celebration events for 2017-2018, which would be

explored further in the Business Planning day.

Resolution The Heritage Council of NSW noted the report.

2017-19. The Heritage Council of NSW:

1. Endorses in principle a total of $220,000 (existing allocation of $120,000) for the

publications Design in Context, Alterations and Additions and Sustainability publications,

to be expended by December 2017.

Moved by Mr Stephen Davies and seconded by Ms Jenny Davis.

9.0 General Business

9.1 Committee Chairs

Discussion It was noted the Technical Conservation Committee did not have an alternate nominated in August

2016.


1. Appoints Mr Gary White as alternate Chair to the Technical Conservation Committee for a

term of three years from 1 March 2017 to 29 February 2020.

Moved by Mr Stephen Davies and seconded by Dr Deborah Dearing.

9.2 Chair of the Heritage Council Approvals Committee

Discussion The Chair offered the opportunity for other members of the Heritage Council to Chair the Approvals

Committee to extend their roles.


1. appoints Dr Deborah Dearing as Chair of the Heritage Council Approvals Committee for

the term aligned to her appointment on the Heritage Council.

Moved by Mr Stephen Davies and seconded by Mr Gary White.

9.3 Other matters arising

Discussion Mr Bruce Pettman advised members:

The Public Works Advisory (PWA) Built Heritage Conservation Consultants and Building Contractors

Prequalification Scheme was created to enable government agencies to commission high quality

services for built heritage conservation from prequalified providers across more than 50 heritage

categories and disciplines. The scheme will begin operating in May 2017.


The Scheme aims to be a central, informed heritage reference resource for Public Works Advisory and

other state agencies to match specialist heritage service-provider capabilities and capacities with their

needs and/or obligations for a wide range of heritage works, care/management and compliance on

NSW government heritage assets. This may include work undertaken under the Minister’s Stonework

Program, for large and small projects to state-heritage listed items in government ownership, for

conservation work in the regions through NSW Public Works Advisory regional offices, and for a range

of related activities from investigation and documentation to research, testing and training.

Relevant, experienced service providers are invited to apply to join the Scheme by submitting their

prequalification documents through the procurement portal at www.tenders.nsw.gov.au

There is no closing deadline for applications and once submitted they are assessed as they are

received. As a consequence there are no fixed panels or fixed periods. Single practitioners, small,

medium and large practices are all encouraged to apply. This scheme is for proven, experienced

consultants and contractors.

CLOSE OF MEETING – 1:55 pm.

I confirm that these minutes are an accurate reflection of the Heritage Council of NSW discussion and outcomes.

……………………………….

Mr Stephen Davies

Chair, Heritage Council of NSW

Date: 5 April 2017

http://www.tenders.nsw.gov.au/


Annexure A

Agenda item: 6.1 Roxy Theatre and Peter's Greek Café Complex, Bingara

Listing Boundary Endorsed


Annexure B Agenda item: 6.2

Recommendation to List - Gledswood Curtilage Amendment, Gledswood Hills Listing Boundary Endorsed

Documents

MINUTES OF MEETING 439 Heritage Council of NSW...Minutes of Heritage Council of NSW Meeting – 1 March 2017 Page 4 of 15 b. the Grants Committee [s advice being sought where a Major