Minutes of 32nd Meeting -

fq Cf) IfI 3'l19)Cf ct CfiT Cf) I '4 f(1 '4(~~, ~ 31h l1'1:Zm ~)

~~ c:=rq ~ 11~ "3W1 ~

(~ mcfiR)f.rqfur 'l.rq.y, ~ ~, ~ 31T\ifR -Us,

~ ~-110 108 1115111:::

OFFICE OF THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER(MICRO, SMALL & MEDIUM ENTERPRISES)

MINISTRY OF MICRO, SMALL & MEDIUM ENTERPRISES

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

Nirman Shawan, 7th Floor, Maulana Azad Road,

New Delhi - 110 108MICRO. SMALL & MEDIUM ENTERPRISES~e.-+I ~ a:ih: -q~ ~

Ph.EPABX - 23063800.23063802.23063803 FAX - (91-11) 23062315. 23061726. 23061068, e-mail- [email protected]

No. 15(35)/CDD/32nd SCM/2012 Dated: it" April 2013

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Minutes of 32nd meeting of Steering Committee of MSE-CDP held on20.03.2013 at New Delhi.

A copy of minutes of 32nd meeting of teering Committee of Micro & mall Enterpri es-Clu ter Development Programme (M E-CDP) is enclo ed for information and necessary action aper decision taken in the meeting at the earliest.

,I IjI).)abitra Sarkar)

Joint Development Commissioner (M ME)Ph. No. 011-23062694Fax No. 011-23061972

Encl. a above

To:-

I. Members of the teering Committee (As per list)2. Commis ioner IDirector Indu tries of tate Government (As per list)3. Director, M ME-OJ (A per list)

Copy to:-

1. P 0 to ecretary, MSME2. P to A &DC, M ME

mailto:[email protected]

MINUTES OF 32"d MEETING OF STEERING COMMITTEE OF MICRO AND SMALLENTERPRISES - CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (MSE - COP) HELD

ON 20.03.2013.

32nd

Meeting of Steering Committee of Micro and Small Enterprises - ClusterDevelopment Programme (MSE-CDP) was held under the Chairmanship of ShriMadhav Lal, Secretary, MSME on 20.03.2013 at 10.30 AM in Committee Ro.om, 010DC (MSME), Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi. Secretary (MSME) welcomed all themembers. List of participants is at Annexure -I.

Discussions were held on both main & Supplementary Agenda and minutes ofthe meeting are as follows:

Karnataka

Agenda No. 32.1: Proposals for conducting Diagnostic Studies (OS) in 09clusters by Karnataka Council for Technical Up gradation (KCTU), Bangalore.

Cost forGol

S. No. Name of the cluster conductingapproved*DSR

(Rs. in lakhl (Rs. in lakh)

(i) Desiccated Coconut Powder, Madihalli, Tiptur, 2.45 2.45Tumkur

(ii) Silk Garment Products, Kudur, Ramanagar 1.80 1.80(iii) Automobiles Servicing Cluster, Auto Nagar, 2.50 2.50

Mysore(iv) Engineering Cluster, Mysore Indl. Area, Mysore 2.15 2.15(v) Printing Cluster, Koorgalli Indl area, Mysore 2.00 2.00(vi) Wool Cluster, Hosdurga, Chitradurga 1.80 1.80(vii) Wool Cluster, Chelkere, Chitradurga 1.80 1.80(viii) Puffed Rice Processing Cluster, Harappanahalli, 2.00 ---

Davanagere(ix) Jewellery Cluster, Gandhi Bazar, Shimoga 2.25 2.25

Total 18.75 16.75* Subject to actual

Karnataka Council for Technical Up gradation (KCTU), Bangalore will be implementingagency for all clusters.

In case of Puffed Rice Processing Cluster, JDC, member secretary, informedthat the critical mass i.r.o number of units are less in the cluster.

JDC also pointed out that in 29th SCM dated 24.2.12, 9 proposals from KCTUwere approved by the steering committee for conducting DSRs for which funds wasreleased on 29.3.12. The DSRs received by this office after lapse of 11 monthsinstead of 3 months as per MSE-CDP guidelines. KCTU was requested to maintain thetime schedule.

Decision: Steering Committee approved for conducting Diagnostic study for 08clusters out of 09 DSRs with 100% Gal grant.

In case of Puffed Rice Processing Cluster, Harappanahalli, Davanagere, it wasdecided that as the critical mass and number of units is less in the cluster, the

Page 1 of 25

&'Vo.,,\"> ("' .• ~ ~~~,\ ~. J C", \)

~\J j I'"

proposal will be considered when sufficient units would be available in the cluster asper guidelines of MSE-CDP.

Steering Committee also advised to adhere the time schedule for submission ofDiagnostic Study.

Agenda No. 32.2 Proposal for Soft Interventions in Food Processing,Sakarayapatana, Chikkamagalore, Karnataka.

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for soft interventions in FoodProcessing, Sakarayapatana, Chikkamagalore, Karnataka at a total cost of Rs. 5.25lakh with Gol contribution of Rs. 4.598 lakh and the remaining Rs. 0.652 lakh to becontributed by cluster units/ association.

Agenda No. 32.3 Proposal for Soft Interventions in General Engineering andAgricultural Implement Manufacturing Cluster, K.M. Doddi village, Maddur Taluk, Mandya, Karnataka.

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for soft interventions inGeneral Engineering and Agricultural Implement Manufacturing Cluster, K.M. Doddivillage, Maddur Taluk, Mandya, Karnataka at a total cost of Rs. 5.25 lakh with Golcontribution of Rs. 4.598 lakh and the remaining Rs. 0.652 lakh to be contributed bycluster units/ association.

Agenda No. 32.4 Proposal for Soft Interventions in Embroidery, Garmenting &Zari Cluster, Doddamudahalli, Chamrajanagar, Karnataka.

The proposal was discussed in detail. Chairman has directed that the technicalagencies like NIFT, NID etc. should be involved.

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for soft interventions inEmbroidery, Garmenting & Zari Cluster, Doddamudahalli, Chamrajanagar, Karnatakaat a total cost of Rs. 6.41 lakh with Gol contribution of Rs. 5.562 lakh and theremaining Rs. 0.848 lakh to be contributed by cluster units/ association. TheCommittee suggested including technical agencies like NIFT, NID etc.

Agenda No. 32.5 Proposal for Soft Interventions in Printing Cluster, Tumkur,Karnataka.

Secretary (MSME) directed that expert agency for technical inputs should beinvolved.

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for soft interventions inPrinting Cluster, Tumkur, Karnataka at a total cost of Rs. 6.40 lakh with Golcontribution of Rs. 5.61 lakh and the remaining Rs. 0.79 lakh to be contributed bycluster units/ association. The Committee suggested involving expert agency fortechnical inputs.

Agenda No. 32.1 (5): Proposal for Soft Interventions in Jaggery, Hippargi Villageof Jamakhandi Taluk , Bagalkot, Karnataka.

DC (MSME) informed that the CFTRI should be involved for technical inputs.

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for soft interventions inJaggery, Hippargi Village of Jamakhandi Taluk, Bagalkot, Karnataka at a total cost ofRs. 9.27 lakh with Gol contribution of Rs. 7.85 lakh and the remaining Rs. 1.42 lakh tobe contributed by cluster units/ association. The Committee directed to involve CFTRIfor technical inputs.

Agenda No. 32.2 (5): Proposal for Soft Interventions in Hosiery and ReadymadeGarments, Shigli Village, Sirahatti Taluk, Gadag, Karnataka.

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for soft interventions inHosiery and Readymade Garments, Shigli Village, Sirahatti Taluk, Gadag, Karnatakaat a total cost of Rs. 6.61 lakh with Gol contribution of Rs. 5.722 lakh and theremaining Rs. 0.888 lakh to be contributed by cluster units/ association.

Agenda No. 32.3 (5): Proposal for setting up Soft Interventions in Stone CarvingCluster, Belagatti & Hebbal Village, Sirahatti Taluk, Gadag, Karnataka.

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for soft interventions in StoneCarving Cluster, Belagatti & Hebbal Village, Sirahatti Taluk, Gadag, Karnataka at atotal cost of Rs. 6.32 lakh with Gol contribution of Rs. 5.51 lakh and the remaining Rs.0.81 lakh to be contributed by cluster units! association.

Agenda No. 32.4 (5): Proposal for setting up Soft Interventions of BroomsCluster, Shigli Village, Sirahatti Taluk, Gadag, Karnataka.

After discussion, the committee observed that the activities proposed for softinterventions will not have any impact on cluster. There is a need for marketing, designand other good interventions, which need to be proposed.

Decision: Steering Committee dropped the proposal and suggested that theproposal may come up with good interventions.

Agenda No. 32.5 (5): Proposal for setting up Soft Interventions of Rice and RiceBran Cluster, Mandya Taluk, Mandya, Karnataka.

Steering Committee has suggested making use of Husk for power generation.

Decision: Steering Committee postponed and asked the implementing agency torevise the proposal for soft interventions in Rice and Rice Bran Cluster, Mandya Taluk,Mandya, Karnataka to include programmes on awareness of power generation byusing rice husk etc.

Page 3 of 25

Madhya Pradesh

Agenda No. 32.6: DSR for Rice Milling Cluster, Tehsil Dabra, District Gwalior,Madhya Pradesh.

The proposal was discussed. AS & DC(MSME) desired that use of Rice Huskwhich is a by product may also explored in addition to solvent extraction from bran ..The proposal should make use of husk for power generation. Madhya Pradesh LaghuUdyog Nigam (MPLUN) will be implementing agency

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for conducting DiagnosticStudy in Rice Milling Cluster, Tehsil Dabra at a total cost of Rs. 2.50 with Gol grant ofRs. 2.25 lakh.

Manipur

Agenda No. 32.7: Proposal for Soft Interventions in Handloom Weavers Cluster,Churachandpur town area, Manipur.

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for soft interventions in thecluster for duration of 18 months at a cost of Rs 17.40 lakh with Gol contribution of Rs.13.90 lakh. The State Govt. contribution would be Rs. 1.20 lakh and Rs. 2.30 lakhwould be contributed by cluster units/association.

Agenda No. 32.8: Proposal for Soft Interventions in Handloom Weaving Cluster,Yumnam Huidrom Makha Leikai, Imphal West, Manipur.

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for Soft Interventions in thecluster for duration of 18 months at a total cost of Rs. 6.40 lakh with Gol contribution ofRs. 5.70 lakh, Rs. 0.70 lakh to be contributed by cluster units/association.

Agenda No. 32.9: Proposal for Soft Interventions in Silk weaving Cluster, UtlouMakha Leikai, Bishnupur District, Manipur.


Agenda No. 32.10: Proposal for Soft Interventions in Handloom WeavingCluster, Langthabai Lep, Imphal West, Manipur.


Page 4 of 25

------------------

Agenda No. 32.11: Proposal for in-principle approval of upgradation ofTakyelpat Industrial Estate, Imphal West, Manipur.

Decision: Stee~ing Committee accorded 'In-principle' approval for up gradation ofTakyelpat In~ustnal Estate, Imphal. Accordingly, Govt. of Manipur may submitproposal for final approval as per the guidelines of MSE-CDP within a period of sixmonths.

Agenda No. 32.12 (5): Proposal for in-principle approval of InfrastructureDevelopment (10) at Kuraopokpi, Kakching, Thoubal District, Manipur.

Decision: Steering Committee accorded 'In-principle' approval for InfrastructureDevelopment (10) at Kuraopokpi, Kakching, Thoubal District, Manipur. Accordingly,Govt. of Manipur may submit proposal for final approval as per the guidelines of MSE-COP within a period of six months.

Agenda No. 32.13 (5): Proposal for in-principle approval of InfrastructureDevelopment (ID) at Tera Urak, Bishnupur, Manipur.

Decision: The Steering Committee suggested having a backup plan so thatindustry would set up and function. The proposal of Infrastructure Development (10) atTera Urak, Bishnupur was accorded for in-principle approval. Accordingly, Govt. ofManipur may submit proposal for final approval as per the guidelines of MSE-CDPwithin a period of six months.

West Bengal

Agenda No. 32.12: Proposal for setting up Common Facility Centres in RedBrick Cluster, Barabani, Durgapur, Burdwan, West Bengal.

Steering Committee examined the proposals and also the list of plant andmachinery proposed in the CFC. It was observed by the Committee that the machinesproposed in the CFC in particular lathe machines and welding machine etc., are notfeasible considering the units in the cluster. SIDBI representative also raised objectionon JCB machines.

Decision: Steering Committee did not approve in-principle approval for CFC in thecluster.

Agenda No. 32.13: Proposal for in- principle approval to set up Common FacilityCentres in Plastic Processing Cluster, Dabgram, Rajganj, Jalpaiguri, WestBengal.

The description of the cluster was given by SPV members as well as by StateGovt. They informed the Steering Committee about progress made in this cluster

y..,'3~~ ,~.~ o~'C~.~OC~ Page 5 of25

including procureme~t of land, shareholding pattern, project specific account and alsothe fact.SIOBI appraisal has been done and made available to Office of DC (MSME).The project cost and means of finance are as follows:

p . tCrorec ost:Particulars Total Cost

(Rs. in Lakh)(1.) Land and its Development 37.00

(2.) Building and other Civil Constructions 45.71

(3.) Plant & Machinery(including electrification) 240.66

(4.) Misc. fixed assets 30.75

(5.) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost 7.40

(6.) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 12.94

(7.) Margin money for Working Capital 4.54

Total Project Cost 379.00

Means of Finance:

Particulars %age Amount (Rs. in lakh)(1.) SPV contribution 15.04 57.02

(2.) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India *70.18 266.00

(3.) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of West Bengal 14.78 55.98

Total 100.00 379.00* The grant-in-aid available in the project is up to 90% of project cost as 116 Units inthe cluster out of 125 are Micro.

Decision: After examination of all the necessities as per the guidelines of MSE-COP, the Committee granted final approval to the project for CFC in Plastic processingCluster, Oabgram, Rajganj, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal.

Agenda No. 32.14: Extension of duration of Up-gradation 10 centre at UdayanIndustrial Estate, Kolkata.

Decision: Steering Committee granted extension of duration of project up to so"September 2013.

Agenda No. 32.15: Extension of duration of project for setting up of CFC in Re-rolling Mill Cluster, Howrah.

Steering Committee examined the progress of implementation of CFC in thecluster and desired to know as to why the project has been delayed and how muchtime is further required for completion of CFC. State Govt. ISPV informed thattendering of building as well as some of the machineries could not be completed in

ft<(}..,\ '" S.~!\) Page6 of 25~~\ ~ §J \

- ----- -----------------

time with the result that project activities were started late. The Chairman desired toknow as to how quickly one or two facilities proposed in the CFC can be started. AS &DC (MSME) also informed to the Committee that State Govt. had taken unilateraldecision to release funds to the SPV for creation of infrastructure facilities andmachinery on "cost reimbursement basis" instead of upfront contribution. However,this problem has now been resolved by State Govt. with the SPV.

The CEO from SPV in the cluster assured to start Machine Shop Facility in the CFCby January 2014 with timely availability of funds.

Decision: Steering Committee granted extension of duration of project up to 31st

March 2014.

Uttar Pradesh

Agenda No. 32.16: Proposal for Soft Interventions of Foundry Cluster, Agra,Uttar Pradesh.

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for Soft Interventions in thecluster for duration of 18 months at a total cost of Rs. 21.00 lakh with Gol contributionof Rs. 14.45 lakh, Rs. 6.55 lakh to be contributed by cluster units /association.

Agenda No. 32.17: Proposal for Soft Interventions in Patch Work Cluster,Rampur, Uttar Pradesh.

JOC (CD) informed the Committee that the applicant who has applied is aConsultant instead of Industry association, State Govts'agency/ State Govt. etc. Alsoclear recommendation of the State Govt. was not available. Commissioner ofIndustries, Govt. of UP informed the Committee to consider the proposal. AS&OCsuggested to fulfil all the conditions and get it approved on file.

Decision: Steering Committee decided to get it approved on file.

Agenda No. 32.18: Proposal for Soft Interventions in Pharmaceuticals, KanpurNagar, Uttar Pradesh.

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for Soft Interventions in thecluster at a total cost of Rs. 11.95 lakh with Gol contribution of Rs. 8.43 lakh and Rs.3.52 lakh to be contributed by cluster units/association.

Page 7 of 25

- - -- -- --------------

Agenda No. 32.19: Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study Report (DSR) ofLeather Footwear Cluster, Saharanpur District, Uttar Pradesh.

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for conducting diagnosticstudy in the cluster by MSME- Technology Development Centre (CFTI), Agra at a totalcost of Rs. 2.50 lakh to be made available as Gol contribution.

Agenda No. 32.20: Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study Report (DSR) ofFortified Wheat Flour Cluster, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh.

Decision: Steering Committee may approve the proposal for conducting diagnosticstudy in the cluster by Uttar Pradesh Trade Promotion Authority (UPTPA), Kanpur at atotal cost of Rs. 2.40 lakh to be made available as Gol contribution.

Tamilnadu

Agenda No. 32.21 Proposal for final approval to Up-grade Infrastructure facilitiesat Malumichampatti, District Coimbatore, Tamilnadu under MSE-CDP.

In the centre, 128 plots were constructed and out of these, 115 plots allotted to97 entrepreneurs. State Level Committee is already constituted for the project.Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation (TANSIDCO) Ltd., Chennai willimplement the project within a period of 24 months.

Project Cost:(Rs. in lakh)

Particulars Estimated Recommended Recommended bybylA by SIDBI 0/0 DC (MSME)

i Cost of land filling/levelingincluding boundary wall and 10.50 10.50 10.50fencing

ii Cost of laying roads 71.25 71.25 71.25iii Road side greenery & social 2.00 2.00 2.00forestryiv Water supply including

overhead tanks, and pump 13.00 13.00 13.00houses

v Water harvesting 1.00 1.00 1.00vi Drainage 55.00 55.00 55.00vii Power (sub-station and

distribution network including 32.00 32.00 32.00street light etc.), generation ofnon-conventional ener-gy

viii Contingencies & Pre- 15.25 15.25 4.00operative expensesTotal 200.00 200.00 188.75

Page8 of 25

- ---------

Means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)Particulars Proposed by Proposed by Recommended by

IA SIDBI as per 0/0 DC (MSME)MSE-CDP

i Contribution from 20.00 20.00 26.75allottees

ii Grant from Govt. of TN 60.00 60.00 60.00iii Grant from Govt. of India 120.00 120.00 113.25

Total 200.00 200.00 200.00

Decision: Steering Committee approved the project for Up gradation ofInfrastructure facilities at Malumichampatti, District Coimbatore, Tamilnadu at projectcost of Rs. 200.00 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs. 113.25 lakh.

Agenda No. 32.22 to 32.26:principle approval:

The following CFC proposals were accorded In-

S. Agenda Name of the proposalNo. No.1 32.22 Gate and Grill Cluster, Thiruvallur2 32.23 Gold Jewellary Cluster, Madurai3 32.24 Powerloom Cluster, Salem4 32.25 Readymade Garments (Women) Cluster, Ohalavaipuram,

Virudhunagar5 32.26 Engineering Cluster, Ambattur

In case of CFC in Gate and Grill Cluster, Thiruvallur, AS&OC(MSME) observedthat the ROCE is 13.94% in the first year as per SIOBI appraisal report and desiredthat the ROCE should be 25% or more as per guidelines.

Committee also discussed about the CFC in Powerloorn Cluster, Salem indetail. MO, TANSIOCO mentioned during deliberation that he is also looking after theState Pollution Control Board and the proposal fulfills the requirement of PollutionControl Board, so consent to establish can be granted. AS&OC(MSME) has informed,TANSIOCO, to change the AoA as there is some mistake.

Agenda No. 32.6 (S) Proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre in SteelProduct Fabrication Cluster, Salem

Committee discussed the proposal and observed that the ROCE is 16.61% inthe optimum year i.e. FY 2017 as per SIOBI appraisal. SPV has clarified that theproposal is based upon double shift working and SIOBI has considered the ROCE onlyon single shift basis. Representative of SIOBI assured that he will submit itscomments within a week time.

Decision: Steering Committee accorded final approval for setting up of CommonFacility Centre in Steel Product Fabrication Cluster, Salem. Comments from SIOBI onROCE have already been received.

Page 9 of 25

Tripura

Agenda No. 32.27: Proposal for Soft Interventions in Bamboo made HandicraftsProducts, Shankhala, West Tripura, Tripura.

The representative from EOII, Ahmedabad raised his observation regardingscaling down of cost of soft interventions from Rs. 24.70 lakh to Rs. 8.00 lakh in theAgenda and further while scheme guidelines clearly mentions 90% Gol contribution forsoft interventions in clusters for NE Region/micro units, the proposed Gol share is lessthan 90% in this cluster as well as in Leather Cluster, Topsia, Kolkata. In this regard,JOC (CD) informed that earlier Gol funds for soft interventions in Leather Cluster,Topsia, Kolkata approved by Steering Committee in its 3151 meeting has not beenconcurred by IF Wing due to the fact that activity wise budget proposed was not foundexactly as per the Annexure - I of guidelines of MSE-COP.

2. In this regard, Secretary (MSME) as the Chairman of Steering Committeereferred Annexure - I guidelines of MSE-COP and clarified that Proposed Budget inthis Annexure is only indicative and in case of clusters of NE and hill states / morethan 60% MicroNiliagelWomen owned SC/ST units etc., the Gol grant will be 90%.AS & DC (MSME) further added that the file relating to release of funds in LeatherCluster, Topsia, Kolkata in which Gol contribution is less than 90% proposed may beput up.

Decision: Keeping in view the above clarifications given by Chairman of SteeringCommittee, proposal for Soft Interventions in the cluster was approved for duration of18 months at a total cost of Rs. 8.00 lakh with Gol contribution of Rs. 7.20 lakh (90%)and Rs. 0.80 lakh (10%) to be contributed by cluster units/association. Following willbe the revised funding budget keeping in view the 90% funding:

Action Plan for soft intervention for 18 MonthsDescription Total GOI Associ Outcomes

ation

01. fA,wareness programme on 0.80 0.72 0.08 Creation of awareness andCluster development and information disseminationits benefits about the project and trust

building among the clustermembers.

02. [Technoloqy, design 1.00 0.90 0.10 [To Understand the presentmapping and & Workshop process & find out areas ofIon needed technology and improvement on technologydesign development and design.

p3. Skill development training 1.00 0.90 0.10 20 beneficiaries will be givenon bamboo furniture and raining on manufacturing ofbamboo made utilities modern trend bamboo

urniture and other bamboo~\

Page 10 of 25

made utilities.

p4. lA.dvanced Training on 1.00 0.90 0.10 120beneficiaries will beinishing process of rained on advance finishingbamboo handicrafts jof the products to meet theincluding furniture modern taste.

ns High-end Design 1.00 0.90 0.10 Improve knowledge aboutIdevelopment and creation he modern handicraftsjof design pool/bank for the utilities and the designunits and individual pool/bank will help theartisans artisans to produce

diversified products

06. Product Standardization 1.00 0.90 0.10 Product standardization willand Quality Control ensure consistency in

product quality and maintainstandardization.

07. Exposure visit 1.00 0.90 0.10 Learning from best practicesand bettor adoption ofCluster DevelopmentStrategy

08. a. Network Formation b. 1.00 0.90 0.10 a. To unite the cluster actors/Website development and and forming consortium for!establishing direct market 'oint benefits b. Marketlinkages Idevelopment and brand

building.

09. a. Initiating best 0.20 0.18 0.02 a. (i) The micro units willmanagement practice and adopt better managemententrepreneurship and operating practices (ii)awareness b. CDCC IThe artisans will bemeeting, Developing acilitated to work likeMonitoring and Evaluation entrepreneurs. It will improve(M&E) system, publishing heir level of motivation b. (i)newsletter, case study, Important decision will beIdocumentation. aken and review of

performance will improveimplementation efficacy. (ii)Information disseminationabout the benefits of thecluster developmentprogramme (COP).

lTotal: 8.00 7.20 0.80.e

('+-"', Page 11 of 25

----------

Punjab

Agenda No. 32.28: DSR for Steel Re-rolling Mills Cluster, Ludhiana.

Committee discussed the various issues like energy conservation,technology upgradation and pollution related problems etc. State Governmentrepresentative clarified that the cluster is basically induction furnaces cluster but due toproblem in online application filling system the name "Steel Re-rolling Mill Cluster,Ludhiana" was wrongly entered. Committee has advised to make use of Technologyupgradation Scheme.

Decision: Committee approved the Diagnostic Study Report in Induction FurnacesCluster, Ludhiana at a total project cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh, Gol contribution maximum toRs. 2.50 lakh or actual cost, whichever is less.

Haryana,

Agenda No. 32.29 (i to iv) and 32.7 (S) (i to v):- Diagnostic Studies in 9 clusters

Steering Committee discussed the proposals. Director of Industries and Commerce,Government of Haryana explained about the proposals

(Rs. in lakh)Agenda Implementing Name of the Cluster Project GolNo. Ag_ency Cost contribution

32.29 (i) Textile Machinery Cluster, 2.50 2.50*Panipat

32.29 (ii) Fitness & Surgical Equipments 2.50 2.50*Cluster, Bhiwani

32.29 (iii) Investment Plastic Multi Product Cluster, 2.50 2.50*Promotion Bhiwani

32.29 (iv) Centre, Scientific Instruments Cluster, 2.50 2.50*Department of Am~ala32.7(S) (i) Industries and Glass Cluster, Ambala 2.50 2.50*

32.7(S) (ii) Commerce, Quilt and Allied Products Cluster, 2.50 2.50*Government of Panipat

32.7(S) (iii)Haryana Engineering Cluster, 2.50 2.50*Yamunanagar

32.7(S) (iv) Packaging Cluster, Sector-58, 2.50 2.50*Faridabad32.7(S) (v) Plywood, Cluster, Yamunanagar 2.50 2.50*

* Gol contribution maximum to Rs. 2.50 lakh or actual cost, whichever is less.

In case of DSR proposal in Glass Cluster, Ambala, Chairman of the Committeedesires that State Government must ensure that the units of the said cluster do notrequire any local statutory clearances for working from pollution angle.

Decision: Steering Committee approved for conducting Diagnostic study for above9 clusters with 100% Gol grant.

Page12 of 25

Agenda No. 32.30 to 32.33: 'Four CFC proposals for in-principle approval:

S. Agenda Name of the proposalNo. No.1 32.30 Agriculture Implements Cluster, Karnal2 32.31 Pharmaceuticals Cluster, Karnal3 32.32 Readymade Garment Cluster, Village Mohammadpur, Gurgaon4 32.33 Stainless Steel Cluster, Kundli, Sonepat

Decision:, Steering Committee granted in-principal approval for all the above fourproposals. Further, the committee suggested that in case of Readymade GarmentCluster, Village Mohammadpur, Gurgaon, the implementing agency should ensure thebenefits of the scheme should be mainly availed by micro & small enterprises.

Kerala

Agenda No. 32.34: Proposal for Soft Interventions of General EngineeringCluster, Thalassery, Kannur, Kerala.

The Chairman observed that activities proposed in the Action Plan mostlyrelates to organizing awareness programme of various schemes of office of DC(MSME) as well as other Ministries. Chairman suggested that existing schemesalready provides funding support for organizing relevant programmes and EDII,Ahmedabad can apply for funding support under such schemes.

Decision: In view of above, Steering Committee suggested EDII, Ahmedabad torevise the Action Plan as per the need of cluster keeping in the view schemeguidelines and re-submit the proposal.

Agenda No. 32.35: Proposal for in-principle approval to set up Common FacilityCentres in Wooden Furniture, Kozhikode, Kerala.

Decision: Steering Committee accorded 'in-principle' approval to set up ofCommon Facility Centre (CFC) in Furniture Cluster, Kozhikode, Kerala.

Agenda No. 32.36 Approval of revised list of Plant and Machinery for setting upof CFC in Ethnic Food Cluster, Pala, Kottayam, Kerala

Secretary (MSME) desired to know the present technology and problems of thecluster units and how it will help the units with revised changes in the plant andmachinery.

2. State Govt. as well as Dr. N. Anandavally from Food Safety SolutionsInternational and also UN Consultant in FSMS speaking on behalf of cluster unitsinformed that list of plant and machineries now proposed in the CFC has beenselected keeping in view the need of cluster and their nature of activities. She furtherinformed that it is a Women cluster and their technology is poor with lack of hygieneand poor packaging with the result that these units are not able to compete and face

~~\"? S ~v.~~:C'\{ OC rG Page 13 of 25Ve: .)

marketing problem also despite availability of orders. Cluster representative was notable to convince properly.

Decision: The Steering Committee approved the revised list of plant and machineryfinally submitted by State Govt. vide letter no. 20004/CDP/K-BIP/2013 dated28.02.2013 except Extruder, Rice flaker and Puffing machine. The cost of project andmeans of finance would be as follows:

Component of Project Cost:

S. Description Amount (Rs. inN. lakh)1. Land 15.002. Building 35.753. Plant and Machinery *337.114. Working Capital required 10.00

Total 397.86

* Approved list of Plant and Machinery:

1. Raw Materials storage facility. -- 50 mt. ton. Capacity Quantity Cost inRs.in lakh

Sintex pallets 20 Nos. 1

Exhaust fan 6 Nos. 0.2

Air curtains 4 Nos 0.6

Fly catcher 3 Nos 0.15

Seablast puff boxes 21 Olts* 10nos 0.5

Racks slotted angle 6 Nos. 0.25

Trolley 6 Nos 0.9

Fork lifter 2 Nos 1.5

Weighing balance 3 Nos. 0.25

Sub total 5.352. Raw materials Chill room storage facility. - 30 MT.capacity Cost in

Rs. in lakhChill room (1500 sq. ft.) 22.50Blast freezer 10Anti room 2Outlet air curtain 0.15Siltex pallets 2Trolley 4 Nos 0.80Air curtains 2 Nos 0.30

Thermograph 0.20Sub total 37.95

Cost in3. Packaging facility -- 500 sq ft. Rs. in lakhPackaging machines with vaccum sealing 3 Nos 8.00UV lights I No 0.10Tubelizht fittings 10 Nos 1.00Bar coding machine .••~ Nos 1.00

r,~~" . Page 14 of 25

Trolleys I Nos 0.15Air curtains I Nos 0.15Sub total 10.40

Cost in4. Training facility for conducting training & demo - 500 sq. ft. Rs. in lakhMultimedia projector I Nos. 1.00Computer 7 nos. 3.00

Printers, Xerox, Co02ier, Accessories I set each 2.00

Video, photo facility, TV, DVD, Speakers 1 set each 1.50

Furniture and fittings 2.00Sub total 9.505. Food Testing Facility 15.006. Finished Chill room storage facility (2 location)-30 MT. Cost incapacity Rs. in lakhChill room cold storage 16.00Siltex pallets 1.00

Air curtains 0.10Thermograph 0.20Sub total 17.30Total cost of Chill Room facility for 2 locations 34.607. Supporting Equipments

Generators 20.00Fire Fighting Equipments 2.00Installation, Commissioning and Electrification 32.51Office Equipments 5.00Contingency for plant and machinery 15.75Sub Total 75.268. Others

Rice Powder Unit (5 MTD with complete accessories like destoner,sifter, washing unit, pulvarisor, roaster, packing unit etc. 138.75Chapati Maker( 1000 per hr.) 10Weighing balance 10 kg-IOO kg 0.30Sub total 149.05Grand Total 337.11

Means of Finance:Particulars %age Amount (Rs. in lakh)

Gol contribution 70.00 Rs. 278.50 lakhSPV Contribution 10.00 Rs. 39.791akhGovt. of Kerala 20.00 Rs. 79.571akhTotal Rs. 397.86 lakh

Page 15 of 25

Agenda No: 32.11(5): Proposal for setting up Common Facility Centres ofPrinting Cluster, Kannur District, Kerala.

The details of cluster and problems faced by cluster units was informed byState Govt./SPV in the cluster to the Committee as well as facilities proposed in theCFC. The Committee observed that land has been procured by SPV and SIOBIappraisal has also been completed. Keeping in view the recommendations ofTechnical Committee, the project cost and means of finance would be as follows:

Project Cost:[Rs. in Lakh)

S.N Particulars Total Cost

1 Land and its Development 30.00

2 Building and other Civil Constructions 55.00

3 Plant & Machinery (including electrification & installation @5%) *1035.32

4 Misc. fixed assets 15.00

5 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost 30.00

6 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 52.87

7 Margin money for Working Capital 3.95

Total Project Cost 1222.14

*List of Plant & Machinery is as follows:fRs. in Lakh)

S.N. Machinery Nos. Total Amount1. DTP Systems 10 15.002. CTP (Computer to plate) Machine 1 70.443. Plate exoosino machine 1 03.094. 4 colour Double Demy Offset machine 1 576.005. Multi colour Web offset machine 1 209.996. Programmable paper cutting machine (115 cm) 1 23.007. UPS for CTP Equipment 1 8.008. Servo Stabilizer 1 3.009. Diesel Generator Set 1 25.0010. Transformer 1 12.0011. Air Conditioninq Equipment 22 Ton. 1 6.0012. Forklift 2 MT. 1 2.5013. Single Colour Double Demy Offset 1 32.00

Total 986.0214 Add: Electrification & Installation @5% 49.30

Grand Total 1035.32

Page 16 of 25

---- ------------

Means of Finance:

Particulars %age Amount (Rs. in lakh)

(1.) SPV contribution 10.00 122.21

(2.) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 70.00 855.50

(3.) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Kerala 20.00 244.43

Total 100.00 1222.14

Decision: Steering Committee granted final approval to the project for setting up ofCFC in Printing Cluster, Kannur at a total cost of Rs. 1222.14 lakh with Golcontribution of Rs. 855.50 lakh.

Odisha

Agenda No. 32.37 (i) Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study Rice and RiceBran Cluster, Balasore

III

Committee discussed and observed that the cluster should make use of husk forpower generation.

Decision: Committee approved the Diagnostic Study Report in Rice and Rice BranCluster, Balasore at a total project cost of Rs. 1.00 lakh, Gol contribution maximum toRs. 1.00 lakh. The diagnostic study should be conducted by MSME-DI, Cuttack.

Agenda No. 32.37(ii) Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study in Dry FishCluster, Paradeep.

Becision: Committee approved the Diagnostic Study Report in Dry Fish Cluster,Paradeep at a total project cost of Rs.2.50 lakh, Gol contribution maximum to Rs. 2.50lakh or actual cost, whichever is less.

Agenda No. 32.8 (S) Proposal for final approval for setting up Common FacilityCentre (CFC) in Cashew Cluster, Ganjam, Odisha.

The proposal for setting up of CFC in Cashew Cluster, Ganjam, Odisha wasdiscussed. Project cost and means of finance are given below:-

P . t C trojec os:S. Particulars Amount (Rs. in lakh)No.1 Land 45.00

Site development 4.80Boundary Wall 15.02

2 Building 153.413 Plant & Machinery 446.07

Page 17 of 25

4 Misc. fixed assets(Furniture, Fire Equipment, Power 6.79Backup)

5 Pre-operative Expenditure (Advance for power etc.) 10.766 Contingencies (2% Building and 5% Machineries) 25.377 Margin money for working capital 20.38

Total 727.60

Means of Finance:

Particulars Amount (Rs. in lakh)1. SPV contribution 82.082. Govt. of India contribution 500.003. Govt. of Odisha contribution 145.52

Total 727.60

AS&DC(MSME) desires to know the status of mortgage Godown to AXIS Bank. SPVclarified that godown has no link with the proposed CFC and site proposed for CFC istotally different on separate location. AS&DC(MSME) has also desired that SPVshould adhere to the compliances of SIDBI appraisal.

Decision: Steering Committee accorded "Final Approval" for setting up of CFC inCashew Cluster, Ganjam, Odisha.

Assam

Agenda No. 32.38: Proposal for Soft Interventions of Bamboo Cluster,Bornagaon and Chotonagaon, Darrang, Assam.

Decision: Since no representative from MSME-DI, Guwahati or cluster member waspresent to explain about the proposal, the Steering Committee postponed theproposal.

Agenda No. 32.39: Proposal for in-principle approval to set up new IndustrialEstate, Moran, Dibrugarh, Assam.

Representative from AIDC, Guwahati informed the Committee regarding detailsof development of this new Industrial Estate. AS & DC (MSME) suggested that Govt.of Assam should ensure laying of concrete roads instead of black top road in the IDCentre keeping in view the excessive rain in the region. The representative from AIDC,Guwahati agreed and informed that SIDBI appraisal would soon be submitted.

Decision: Steering Committee accorded 'In-principle' approval to set up new IndustrialEstate, Moran, Dibrugarh, Assam. Accordingly, Govt. of Assam may submit proposalfor final approval as per the guidelines of MSE-CDP within a period of six months.

Page 18 of 25

Andhra Pradesh

Agenda No. 32.40: Proposal for In-principle approval of setting up of CommonFacility Centre in Fan Cluster, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh.

The proposal was discussed in detail as a complaint was received.AS&DC(MSME) directed that JDC(PS) would visit the cluster to examine & findinterest of 150 cluster beneficiaries in setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC).

Decision: Steering Committee accorded in-principle approval for setting up of CFCin Fan Cluster, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh.

Agenda No. 32.41 Proposal for in-principle approval to set up Common FacilityCentres of Gold Jewellary Cluster, Vijayawada, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh.

Decision: Steering Committee accorded in-principle approval for setting up of CFCin Gold Jewellary Cluster, Vijayawada, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh.

Agenda No. 32.42: Proposal for final approval to up-grade infrastructurefacilities at JRD Industrial Estate, Kanuru, Vijayawada, Krishna District, AndhraPradesh.

The proposal was discussed in detail and AS&DC (MSME) asked about theowner of the industrial estate. Representative of APIIC informed that the existingindustrial estate is maintained by Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation(APIIC) Ltd. which is an implementing agency (IA) for the project. IA raised a queryregarding ceiling amount for up-gradation project. AS&DC (MSME) appraised theguidelines. As per para 10(b) of guidelines, for existing clusters i.e. up-gradationproposals will be based on actual requirements. However, the cost of project shouldnot exceed the maximum limit of Rs. 10.00 crore. The industrial estate

Project Cost:(Rs. in lakh

s. Particulars As per IA As per Eligible underNo. SIDBI MSE-CDP

1. Laying roads 485.00 625.00 485.00

2. Drainage 140.00 140.00

3. Road side greenery & social forestry 3.87 3.87 3.87

4. Water supply including overhead 36.50 36.50 36.50tanks, and pump houses

5. Water harvesting 6.25 6.25 6.25

6. Power distribution, Street light 50.00 50.00 50.00arrangements, etc.

7. Administrative and Other Services 22.00 22.00 22.00Complex

Page 19 of 25

8. Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 4.00 4.00 4.00

9. Contingencies & Pre operative 20.00 20.00 20.00expenses:

Total 767.62 767.62 767.62

Means of finance:(Rs. in lakh)

S. Particulars Proposed Proposed by As per MSE·No. bylA SIDBI COP

1. Govt. of India Grant 614.10 614.10 614.10(80%)

2. Others 153.52 153.52 153.52

Total 767.62 767.62 767.62* IA should submit documentary proof to avail 80% Gol grant.

Decision: Steering Committee accorded "final approval "of the project forUpgradation of infrastructure facilities at JRD Industrial Estate, Kanuru, Vijayawada,Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh at a total cost of Rs. 767.62 lakh with Gol assistanceof Rs. 614.10 lakh.

Agenda No. 32.9(5): Proposal for final approval to set up of 10 centre atAutomotive & Engineering Cluster Park, Toopran MandaI, Medak District,Andhra Pradesh.

AS&DC (MSME) informed that this proposal was placed in the 29th SteeringCommittee Meeting held on 22.02.2012. In that Meeting, AS&DC(MSME) appraisedthe Committee that COWE members, which are the intended beneficiaries of theproject have already been allotted land by APIIC (Implementing Agency) for thisproject whereas AS&FA has mentioned that as per guidelines of MSE-CDP schemes,the land should be in the name of the Implementing Agency. After discussion, SteeringCommittee decided that the proposal will be considered on file subject to condition thatland title is in the name of IA as stipulated in scheme guidelines. APIIC informed thatthey have been developing industrial estate for Automobile and Engineering Industriesin about 750 acre of land in Medak district. The said lands were transferred by Govt. toAPIIC in March 2007 for the development of Industrial Park. Out of 750 acres, topromote ancillary units to the automobile sector under MSME, the APIIC has madeconditional allotment of about 29.99 acres to COWE (Confederation of WomenEntrepreneurs), Association of Women Entrepreneurs. To facilitate further allotmentsto its members, the APIIC had executed conditional sale deed to COWE on 24th Feb2010.

The APIIC will implement the project which has been submitted to % DC(MSME) and thereafter, APIIC would monitor and maintain COWE Industrial Estate.

ft "'\,s-~~~~~~:o\~·,:>OC'(C Page 20 of 25

The APIIC will take further necessary action by signing MOU with COWE fordevelopment and maintenance.

Project Cost:(Rs. in lakh)

Particulars Estimate Recommende Eligibled by IA d under MSE-

by SIOBI COPi) Cost of land filling/ levelling including 102.58 100.00 100.00

boundary wall and fencingii) Cost of laying roads 145.00 145.00 145.00iii) Landscaping / Road side greenery/ Social 10.61 10.00 10.00

forestryiv) Water supply including overhead tanks and 113.19 110.00 110.00

pump housev) Water harvesting 10.44 10.00 10.00vi) Drainage 61.31 60.00 60.00vii) Power (Sub station and distribution 256.32 250.00 250.00

network work including street light etc.),Generation of non-conventional energy

viii) Other (sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.61 10.00 10.00ix) Administrative office building 39.65 20.00 20.00x) Telecommunication / Cyber 19.82 19.82 19.82

centrelDocumentation centrexi) Conference Hall / Exhibition centre 39.65 30.00 30.00xii) Bank / Post office 19.82 19.82 19.82xiii) Raw material storage facility, Marketing 39.65 39.65 39.65

outletsxiv) First aid centre, Creche, Canteen 19.82 19.82 19.82xv) Effluent Treatment Facilities 78.26 78.26 78.26xvi) Contingencies & Pre-operative expo 21.74 18.45 18.45

Total 988.47 940.82 940.82

Means of finance:(Rs. in lakh)

Particulars Proposed by SIOBIAs per MSE-COPguidelines

1. Gol grant under MSE·CDP 752.65 752.652. State Govt. 188.17 188.17

Total 940.82 940.82

Decision: Steering Committee approved the project for final approval to set up ofID centre at Automotive & Engineering Cluster Park, Toopran Mandai, Medak District,Andhra Pradesh at a total cost of Rs. 940.82 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs. 752.65lakh.

Page 21 of 25

Jharkhand

Agenda No. 32.43: Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Studies in

S. No. Name of the cluster(i) Blacksmith Products Manufacturing Cluster, Barki Lari, Ramgarh(ii) Food Processing, Ormanjhi, Ranchi

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for conducting DiagnosticStudies in both clusters at a total cost of Rs. 1.00 lakh or actual, whichever is less foreach cluster.

Gujarat

Agenda No. 32.44: Proposal for In-principle approval of setting up CommonFacility Centre in Pump and Foundry Cluster, Rajkot.

During discussion AS&DC(MSME) mentioned that Pump Clusters, Rajkot andCoimbatore should interact with each other particularly for improving energy efficiency,they can change the energy scenario of country.

Decision: Steering Committee accorded in-principle approval for setting up of CFCin Pump and Foundry Cluster, Rajkot.

Maharashtra

Agenda No. 32.45 Soft intervention in Turmeric Cluster, Sangli.

During discussion AS&DC(MSME) desired that the proposed action planrequires modification and activity proposed at SI. No.2, Building awareness - 02programmes (costing Rs.0.80 lakh) and SI. No.12, Participation in one Foreign fair(costing Rs.5.00 lakh) are not required, the funding proposed towards these activitiesmay be added in the activity at SI. No.4 workshop on improvement in testing facilitiesand Bio Technology interventions with revised funding pattern (i.e. total cost of Rs.4.1 0lakh Gol of Rs. 3.86 lakh and SPV of Rs.2.74 lakh).

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for soft interventions inTurmeric Cluster, Sangli at a total cost of Rs.20.02 lakh for duration of 18 months withGol contribution of Rs.14.84 lakh and the remaining Rs.5.18 lakh to be contributed bycluster units/association subject to above modification.

MiscellaneousAgenda No. 32.10 (5): Proposal for organizing Training Programme on ClusterDevelopment by Institute of Applied Manpower Research (IAMR).

Decision: Steering Committee approved the proposal for organizing the ClusterDevelopment Training Programme by IAMR, New Delhi at a total cost of Rs. 5.25 lakhor actual, whichever is less.

Page 22 of 25

-------

Annexure 1

List of participants in 32nd Meeting of Steering Committee MSE-CDP held on20.03.2013.

S. No. Name & Designation S/Shri Office1 Madhav Lal, Secretary(MSME) In chair2 Amarendra Sinha, AS&DC Ministry of MSME3 C.K. Mishra, Joint Secretary Ministry of MSME4 B.N. Nanda, Economic Adviser Ministry of MSME5 Chandan Saha, Joint Adviser Planning Commission6 S.V. Kelkar, DGM SIDBI7 Pabitra Sarkar, Jt. Dev. Commissioner Office of DC(MSME)8 Dr. Izzatullah, Director (Chem.) Office of DC(MSME)9 Dr. Mandloi, Director MSME-DI, Indore10 D. Chandra Sekhar, Director MSME-DI, Hubli11 Vijay Kumar, Director MSME-DI, Karnal12 G. R. Akadas, Director MSME-DI, Hyderabad13 S.S. Dhillon, Director MSME-DI, Ludhiana14 R. B. Gupta, Director MSME-DI, Kanpur15 Arvind Pathan, Director MSME-DI, Ahmedabad16 M. Lakra, Director MSME-DI, Jharkhand17 Th. Baite MSME-DI, Imphal18 Kuldeep Singh, AD (Hosiery) Office of DC(MSME)19 K.K. Funda, AD(Mech) Office of DC(MSME)

20 A.K. Ojha, AD (Food) Office of DC{MSME)21 S. M. Rangaprasad, DD(Chem.) MSME-DI, Bangalore22 P.K. Gugta, D.,Y.Director IIc MSME-DI, Cuttack23 Pradeep Kumar, Director IIC PPDCITC, Agra24 D. Karthikeyan, CMD TANSIDCO25 V. Muniyappa, MD KCTU, Bangalore26 Satyaprakash T L, Director (Industries) Govt. of Haryana

27 Sita Ram Meena, Comm. & 01 01, Kanpur, U.P.28 A. K. Yadav, Director MSSE, Govt. of West Bengal29 B. John Tlangtin Khuma, Director Comm. & Indust., Manipur

H.D. Shrimali, Addl. Industries Industries Commissioner office,30 Commissioner Govt. of Gujarat, Gandhinagar31 Shashi Singh, Jt. Director 01, U.P.32 S.K. Agarwal, GM (Delhi Zone) U.P. Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd.33 P.K. Gupta, GM DIC, Aligarh, U.P.

Directorate of Industries, Govt. of34 S.R. Londhe, Dy. Director Maharashtra, Indus. Deppt.

35 S.S. Rekhi, Sr. Indl. Officer DIC, Ludhiana

Page 23 of 25

"

36 S. Thyagarajan, GM (Scheme) TANSIDCO37 R. Arvlpandian TANSIDCO38 K. Nagarajan, Manager TANSIDCO39 Ravi Kumar, Chairman APIIC IAlA,40 Ch. S.S. Prasad, CGM (Projects) APIIC, Hyderabad41 V. Ramesh, Secretary APIIC,IALA42 A. Mazumdar, Manager(T) AIDC Ltd., Guwahati43 Santhosh S, GM K- SIP, Kerala

0/0 Resident Commissioner, Govt.44 G. Rama Kotaiah, AD (Tourism) of A.P., New Delhi

0/0 GM, District Industries Centre,45 Jagdev Singh, Functional Manager ludhiana46 S. Ekambarnath, Consultant Il&FS IDCl H1derabad47 O.P. Srivastava, Manager MPlUN Ltd., Gwalior48 Raj Kumar SPV49 Sanjay Pal, EDI EDI, Ahmedabad50 D. Pradeep Kumar SPV51 V.S. Sukumar, EDI52 R. Vasudevan, Cost Accountant

Amabattur Topsia Engg.53 C. Sundarriyas Consortium Pvt. Ltd.

Vishwakarma Gold Smiths (P) Ltd,54 D. Srinivas Rao, CMD Vijayawada, A.P.

Vishwakarma Gold Smiths (P) Ltd,55 Sasheer Ahmad, Director Vijayawada, A.P.

56 A.S.K. Sharma FMS New Delhi57 Deepak Sharma, Consultant Access Consultancy

Ganjam Cashew Cluster, Ganjam,58 J.M. Panda, Director Odisha59 O.K. Mehta, Induction furnace, Ass of NI

MITCON Consultancy Eng.60 Aniruddha Kadam Services Ltd.61 Gagahrsh AEMA RMG Gurogaon62 Rajiv D. Patil Sangli Turmeric Cluster Pvt. Ltd.63 Som Nath, Secretary KAIMA64 R. K. Arora, President KAIMA65 Angad Dhawan Gurgaon Cluster Services Pvt. Ltd.

Saharanpur Footwear66 Sushil Anand, GS Manufactures Association

Saharanpur Footwear67 Vipul Kumar, Secretary Manufactures Association

Saharanpur Footwear68 Rajeshwar Choudhary, President Manufactures Association69 G. P. Roy, CEO HCCI Rolling Mill Cluster, Howrah

Page 24 of 25

-- - --------------

... Jalpaiguri Siliguri, Plastic70 Mohan Debnath Processing Centre

Jalpaiguri Siliguri, Plastic71 Deepak Agarwal Processing Centre

Steel Cluster Services Salem Pvt.72 M. ILangovan Ltd.73 Ritesh Nareoi, Director Hyderabad Fan Cluster74 Nanda Kumar, C.R., CEO Printers Cluster Kannur Kerala

Zamorian Furniture Consortium,75 Gangadaaran Malayil, Chairman Kozhikode76 Pawan Kumar Hyderabad Fan Cluster Pvt. Ltd.77 K. Govindaram Gate and Grills (SPV)

Madurai Jewellery Manufactures78 V.J. Nagarajan, Chairman Consortium Ltd., Madurai79 N. Palanisamy, MD Salem looms Cluster, Tamilnadu

Dalavaipuram Readymade80 Shanthi Venkatesh, Secretary Garments Cluster

Dalavaipuram Readymade81 Shobana Garments Cluster

Madurai Jewellery Manufactures82 S. Thirupathi Raja, MD Consortium Ltd., Madurai

Madurai Jewellery Manufactures83 B. Ganesh Kumar, Director Consortium Ltd., Madurai84 V. Surendran, Director Salem looms Cluster, Tamilnadu

85 Manoj Co-operative Society

86 Basjevnder Co-operative Society

Madurai Jewellery manf.87 M. Rajesh Baba, Director Consortium P Ltd.

88 Ketan Kakkad, Consultant GITCO, Ahmedabad

89 Kamalnayan, Director Falcon Pumps Pvt. Ltd, Rajkot

90 Jignest E. Patel, Chairman Real Cast, Rajkot

91 Dhiral S Bhatt, Secretary RETARC-REA Rajkot, Gujarat

92 Jolly Josep, MD O-Max Cluster, Pala

93 M.L. Atal, GM DTIC, Gwalior, M.P.

Salem District Small Scale & Tiny94 K. Mariappan, MD Industries Association

95 Dr. Anandavally, Tech Consultant FSSI

,

Page 25 of 25

Documents

Minutes of 32nd Meeting -