Upload
ceana
View
20
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Minnesota e-Health Summit, June 16, 2011 Beacon Overview - Lacey Hart, MBA, PMP®. Demonstrate a vision of the future where: Hospitals, clinicians, & patients are meaningful users of health IT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Minnesota e-Health Summit, June 16, 2011 Beacon Overview - Lacey Hart, MBA, PMP®
Extend advanced health IT & exchange infrastructure
Leverage data to inform specific delivery system & payment strategies
Demonstrate a vision of the future where: Hospitals, clinicians,
& patients are meaningful users of health IT
Communities achieve measurable & sustainable improvements in health care quality, safety, efficiency, and population health
2
17 Beacon Communities• Louisiana Public Health
Institute, New Orleans, LA• Southeast Minnesota, MN• Rhode Island Quality Institute,
Providence, RI• Rocky Mountain Health
Maintenance Organization, Grand Junction, CO
• Southern Piedmont Community Care Plan, Inc., Concord, NC
• The Regents of the University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA
• University of Hawaii at Hilo, Hilo, HI
• Western New York Clinical Information Exchange, Inc., Buffalo, NY
• Community Services Council of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK• Delta Health Alliance, Inc., Stoneville, MS• Eastern Maine Healthcare Systems, Brewer, ME• Geisinger Clinic, Danville, PA• HealthInsight, Salt Lake City, UT• Indiana Health Information Exchange, INC.,
Indianapolis, IN• Inland Northwest Health Services, Spokane, WA
3
ROADMAP“New Model of Care”Improved Patient Care QualityImproved Care EfficiencyPopulation Health ManagementEffective Payment DeliverySustainable Regional ‘Practice’
Population Health DataBest-Practices Discovery Improve Clinical Quality• Asthma Management• Diabetes ManagementReimbursement Modeling
Mobilize & Align RegionCommunity EngagementTechnology InfrastructureData ExchangeAdopt National Standards
4/2010-3/2011 4/2011-3/2012 4/2012-3/2013
KEY PARTNERS: County Public Health
Mayo Clinic RochesterMayo Health System
Olmsted Medical CenterPublic School SystemsWinona Health System
SOUTHEAST MINNESOTA BEACON
4
Southeast MN BEACON GOALS Laying the groundwork for better use of
health information to improve health Demonstrate secure, confidential health
information exchange between parties authorized by the patient
Reduce inappropriate healthcare utilization and cost
Improve the ability of individuals to follow through on disease treatment plans
5
“Ultimate Aim”
Establish SE MN as “the premier population-based laboratory for healthcare delivery, best-practices discovery, reimbursement modeling, clinical quality optimization, and translational research in the country.”
6
Subject Matter Expert WGs
Office of the National Coordinator of Healthcare IT (ONC)
Federal Steering Committee (FSC) - TBN
Eval
uatio
n
Operations
Mayo & Mayo Health System Leadership
Olmsted Medical Leadership
Winona HealthLeadership
SE MN Beacon Governance
MetricsInfrastructureQuality
AcademyCommunity & PH
Engagement
Cross Beacon / ONC Projects
PracticeImplementation
Dept. of Health & Human Services (DHHS)
National Beacon Communities
Comparative Effectiveness
SE MN Beacon Organization
Project Driven teams
MN Congressional
Offices
REOT
CPCCPQOC
SE MN Schools
SE MN Healthcare
SE MN Public Health
Others
Prog
ram
Man
agem
ent
Com
mun
icat
ions
Stak
ehol
ders
Project Initiation Process
Planning Process
Approval to Execute
Public HealthLeadership
ProjectExecution LPH /
SchoolsHIE
ConnectivityData
RepositoryMini-
deliberativeAsthma Phase 1
Broad-band
Diabetes Phase 1
Immun. Pilot
Community Interest Groups
7
Healthcare Transformation
Enable Knowledge discovery in world of data
Patient Outcomes
IT
Satisfy conversations
New models
88
BEACON HIE Requirements
• HIE Document Exchange– Patient cross-correlations between providers and
county healthcare case clients.– Pulling CCD, AAP, Care Plan documents to
render appropriate patient care.– Pulling / Pushing Assessments back to clinicians
• Establish suite of solutions for various provider capacities (from significant to minimal capacity)
9
Drivers for CDR• Driving factors for the repository:
– Beacon Reporting requirements– Population Management– Infrastructures/environment &
project beyond the grant • Provider EMR Systems ->
Provider PM Systems • Population management in
support of meaningful use 10
Healthcare Transformation
Enable Knowledge discovery in world of data
Patient Outcomes
IT
Satisfy conversations
New models
11
Ensuring the values and preferences of informed patients
are brought into our program through meaningful conversation.
Guiding Values
12
Creating Conversation to Overcome Lack of Adherence
Create a two-way conversation that enables patients to participate in making decisions to the extent they prefer.
Medication Choice conversation for a typical patient with Type II Diabetes Courtesy of the Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota - Dr. Victor Montori
13
Healthcare Transformation
Enable Knowledge discovery in world of data
Patient Outcomes
IT
Satisfy conversations
New models
14
Asthma Care Coordination
Includes processes of care coordination with providers, public health and schools.
15
Telemedicine Models
16
http://semnbeacon.com/
17
Building a CommunityDan Jensen, MPH
Community Engagement VisionNew Model of Care
• Accountable Care Organization / High Quality Care– Consistent with our efforts for improving care; Beacon facilitate
improved clinical work flows – Opportunity for Providers to have national visibility as a practice
providing “high value” primary care– Sustain practice improvements as part of Beacon implementation
• MN Community Measures / Meaningful Use– Resources from REACH and SE MN community support our practice
efforts for adoption of technology in a “meaningful manner”– Beacon resources for us to advance our cause and undertake clinical
research efforts 19
Why is SE MN Beacon important to Public Health?
$ 1.7 million investment in user owned and designed community software operating in all 11 SE MN local public health departments
Lays the groundwork for better data to support local public health community health needs assessment
Increases LPH and practice infrastructure for more effective secure data exchange i.e. communicable diseases
Addresses three local public health responsibilities of Community Health Boards
Assure an adequate local public health infrastructure Promote Healthy Communities and Healthy Behaviors Assure the quality and accessibility of health services
20
Why is SE MN Beacon important to Patients (Asthma/Diabetes)
Laying the groundwork for better use of health information to improve health
Demonstrate secure, confidential health information exchange between parties authorized by the patient
Reduce inappropriate healthcare utilization and cost
Improve the ability of individuals to follow through on disease treatment plans
Consists of Eleven Counties in SE MN
Dodge, Fillmore, Freeborn, Goodhue, Houston, Mower,
Olmsted, Rice, Steele, Wabasha, Winona
AsthmaConsists of 47 school districts
in the eleven counties in SE MN.
DiabetesConsists of Home health
facilities and nursing homes for example
Communities of Practice (Example from SE MN Beacon)
Austin Medical CenterMayo Health System
Mayo ClinicOlmsted Medical CenterWinona Health Services
22
Community Engagement Challenges in 2011
• Positively engaging the community to support record based research and practice improvement
• Scaling interventions in the region
23
PRO Initiative: Vision, Structure & ProgressDr. Jeff Sloan
25
PatientClinical profile
Patient-reported QOL-related assessmentintake
Prophylactic interventions for PRO QOL-related domains
Real-time Monitoring of PRO QOL-related domains
Treatment
Triggered supportive care or treatment modification
Improved quality of lifeImproved survivalReduced emergent care
The Vision: QOL PROs as an integrated vital sign
26
Biomarker Assay (BMA) Positive versus Negative23 trials (3,704 patients)
Median Survival (Months)
Median (95% CI)
Log-rankP-value
BMA+ 16.8 (16.1, 17.4)0.0001
BMA- 9.2 (8.1, 10.6)
Survival Time (Years)
BMA+
BMA-
27
BMA- = a score of 5 or lessin patient-reported QOL on a 0-10 scale
Directions: Please circle the number (0-10) best reflecting your response to the following that describes your feelings during the past week, including today. How would you describe: 1. your overall Quality of Life? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 As bad as As good as it can be it can be
This is a reliable and valid measure for cancer patient populations
(Sloan, MCP, 2002; Huschka, Cancer, 2005; Locke, JPSM,2007)cut-off validation:
Butt, JPSM,2008; Sloan, Value in Health, 2007; Temel, J Thorac Oncol, 2006
28
What areas below concern you?
Money•Cost of medicine or supplies•Health insurance•Other concerns
Family•Relationship with spouse or partner•Caring for your family•Living situation
Medicine•Taking medicine•Managing side effects
Monitoring your health condition
Following a healthy lifestyle•Healthy meals•Regular exercise•Sleep (not too much or too little)
Emotional Health •Feeling sad•Feeling anxious•Other concerns about emotions
Physical Health•Pain•Fatigue•Other health concerns
Work•Schedule•Environment•Managing your health condition at work
Getting health care•Getting appointments•Visits to emergency room •Visits to urgent care clinic
Something else?
29
Clinical Pathway for Overall QOL Deficit Management
• Specific QOL domain deficits
EVALUATION
30
PROs in Clinic can be used to:
• Find PRO-related problems
• Uncover otherwise unknown problems
• Modify treatment
31
Case Study #1
• 8 year cancer survivor annual clinic visit• Rated QOL as a 2 out of 10• Initiated conversation• Insomnia• “stupid thoughts”• Suicidal ideation
32
Case Study #1
• Psych referral
• Anti-depressant
• 1 month later QOL was 7
33
Beacon PRO Foci
• Enhanced monitoring can improve outcomes:
• Insulin Control (10%)• Education (50%)• Lifestyle (25%)• Family (35%)• Complications (up to 75%)• Estimates based on DCCT and EDIC trials
NEJM, 329,1993 and NEJM 353, 2005 . 34
Asthma InterventionDr. Erin Knoebel
Asthma Project Team• Accurso, Kathy, Rochester Public
School• Ahern, Lois, Public Health• Aleman, Marty, Public Health• Baumbach, Shaylene, Public Health• Beebe, Calvin E., Mayo Clinic• Bock-Goodner, Cynthia, Mayo Clinic• Donnal, T. M.D., Winona Health• Frazier, Christa, Winona Health• Gunderson, Margene, Public Health• Hart, Lacey, Mayo Clinic• Horton, Ian, Mayo Clinic• Jensen, Dan, Public Health
• Juhn, Young J., M.D., Mayo Clinic• Knoebel, Erin E., M.D., Mayo Clinic• Lowe, David. M.D.; Olmsted Medical • Martin, Erin L., Mayo Clinic• McWilliams, Deb, M.D., Mayo Clinic• O’Brien, Michael, Mayo Clinic• Naessens, James, Sc.D., Mayo Clinic • Ravikumar, Prajna, Mayo Clinic• Targonski, Paul, M.D., Ph.D., Mayo
Clinic• Wellik, Mary, Public Health• Williams, Linda M.D., Olmsted Medical• Yawn, Barbara, M.D., Olmsted Medical
37
School-aged Children: Asthma Prevalence
Asthma is estimated - to occur in 7% of school-age children nationally 1
- to occur in 12% of school aged children in Rochester, MN 2
1. CDC. Surveillance for Asthma --- United States, 1960--1995. MMWR 1998;47[No. SS-1]:1—28
2. Yawn BP, Wollan P, Kurland MJ, Scanlon P. A longitudinal study of the prevalence of asthma in a community population of school age children. J Pediatrics 2002;140(5):576-581.
38
School-aged Children: Asthma Impact
• Poorly controlled asthma can affect – a child’s ability to exercise, – self-esteem, – school performance, – school attendance.
• Asthma action plans can decrease preventable illness.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. 2007. National Asthma Education and Prevention Expert Panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health. Available from URL: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/epr3/index.htm
39
Collaborative ExperienceCommunity Collaborative Asthma Project
in Olmsted County (2007 – present)• Mayo Clinic• Olmsted Medical Center• Olmsted County Public Health• Rochester Public Schools (ISD#535)• Rochester Private Schools
40
Beacon Proposal
Extend the asthma action plan model to the 11-county region, augmented with standards-based HIE.
Sharing action plans for children with asthma can:
1.Reduce healthcare utilization 2. Improve school attendance 3.Reduce time parent misses work
41
Care Coordination
Includes processes of care coordination between health professionals, public health and schools.
42
Asthma Measures
Future/Advanced Measures
Preventative Care Utilization Appropriate Med Usage Inpatient/ED Utilization Acute attacks in school School Absenteeism
Baseline Measures
% patients age 5-18% w/documented Action Plan
% w/Influenza Vaccine % w/pneumonia Vaccine
% of total ED Visits
COST – QUALITY – POPULATION HEALTH43
AAP Expansion ProjectLeverage lessons learned and tools developed in Olmsted County Asthma Action Plan Task Force providing patient-centered care to ensure anyone who cares for a child with asthma has access to and understands that child’s AAP:
• Develop a consent process • Approved by schools and state• Templates are available• Process flow sheets created
SE MN Beacon will expand to ALL school districts: • School System AAP FAQs • Consent Form to Share
Asthma Action Plan Template• Consent Form Process
Flowsheet Template
School Personnel Education :• Access and understanding of
AAPs for ALL personnel• When to Consider
communication with the Provider & Parent
44
Technology Pilots• Technology specifications created by the Asthma Action
Plan Task Force Data Base pilot program – Resources to scale the infrastructure into the Beacon region
• Will pilot first in targeted schools and use lessons learned to generalize the technology approach
• Widespread implementation of a technology solution will take time – Strong emphasis on protecting the confidentiality and best interests
of patients– Multiple EHRs
45
Qualitative Study / Focus Groups
Identify perceived needs and potential barriers related to
the wide spread use of asthma action plans for
school children.
Groups of interest: • Parents of school aged children w/
asthma • School nurses & others that care for
children with asthma in schools• School aged adolescents with asthma • Physicians / nurses who provide health
care for children with asthma
46
Focus Group Analysis:Overarching Themes
• Communication– Stakeholders
• Pairings – parent/school, school/health professional, school/health professional
– Channels• Fax, flyers, walkie talkies, computer interface, paper copies, telephone
– Frequency and timeliness• Asthma severity and control
– Continuum• Individual
• Self-reliance– Support for students’ independence– Awareness of potential triggers
47
• Policies and Protocol– Confidentiality– Initiating processes – i.e. updating AAPs– Education of staff
• “What are we allowed to do”– Assurance of medication in secondary
settings (i.e. field trips, sporting events)– Alignment with state laws, school policies and
“unwritten rules” of communication
Focus Group Analysis:Overarching Themes
48
Survey Results:Nurses and Physicians
• AAPs are an important tool for schools and families• It is important to evaluate whether AAPs make a difference in the care of
asthma in schools• It would be helpful to the care of patients with asthma to have
communications with schools (missed PE, sent home, child’s technique and understanding of disease)
• 90% agree with the concept that consistency in adhering to guidelines is needed
• Time to create the AAP is a constraint for physicians and nurse practitioners (80% no more than 3 minutes of time – preference to review, not create)
• Would like to know more about how the AAP is used at school and the training within the schools of those with access to the AAP
49
Focus Groups-School Sites(School Nurse, Health office, Teachers & Coaches)
• Knowing what to do with Student is Important– Asthma Action Plans are
useful to Health Office staff– Coaches rely on 1st Aid
Training to know what to do• Issues
– Inhalers are kept in Health Office
– Communication of Changes in med order or plan
• Suggestions– Access to electronic
information would help
50
Parent Input• Supportive of Improved
Communication with Schools
• Want Paperwork Process simplified
• Asthma Action Plans are useful tools
• Not concerned about confidentiality & communication between provider & school as long as parent in the loop
51
SE Minnesota Beacon
Using our experience with uni-directional sharing of AAP with schools and the community’s expertise in community based participatory work, we will design and develop a program to provide the child with asthma a “cocoon of care” at school, in organized activities and home, based on the healthcare home’s generated asthma action plan.
52
Winona Deep Dive – Telemedicine ModelJohn Goodman
Utilize the unique market position and resources of Winona Health along with its Winona Community
Partners to expand Beacon Medical Applications.
Winona Deep Dive (WDD)
5454
Leverage the application and meaningful use of EMR and
related HIE strategies developed within Beacon using community based telemedicine applications.
WDD Project Summary Objective
5555
Telemedicine Summary
Integrated View of Healthcare Provider
56
Proprietary and Confidential
One Standard Internal Operating SystemeClinic/eOffice/eAdmin/ePortals/EMR interface
Remote internal
operations
Other Remote HealthcareProviders
ResidentialConnections
Remote Standard
PCs
Mobile Devices
Complex/SimpleShared Remote ePortals
56
Major Telemedicine Issues Integrated View of Healthcare Provider
57
Proprietary and Confidential
One Standard Internal Operating SystemeClinic/eOffice/eAdmin/ePortals/EMR interface
Remote internal
operations
Other Remote HealthcareProviders
Remote Standard
PCs
Mobile Devices
Complex/SimpleShared Remote ePortals
ROI Justification • Reimbursement/cost control• Adoption/Utilization• Cost to implement & support
ResidentialConnections
57
Potential Adoption BarriersIntegrated View of Healthcare Provider
58
Proprietary and Confidential
One Standard Internal Operating SystemeClinic/eOffice/eAdmin/ePortals/EMR interface
Remote internal
operations
Remote HealthcareProviders
A-VuManagedPlatform
Remote Standard
PCs
Mobile Devices
Complex/SimpleRemote Shared ePortals
ResidentialConnections
Adoption/Utilization driven by:- Ease of Use and Reliability.- Security/Privacy concerns related to HIPAA
compliance.- Lack of EMR connectivity.- Measurable improvements in quality of care.- Face-to-face preference.- Time/cost to license/credential/privilege at multiple locations.
58
Proposed Beacon Solutions
• Cost reduction by leveraging commercial and consumer technologies on Broadband Networks.
• A remotely managed system to significantly improve ease of use.
• Expanded applications and locations via Broadband.• A multimode system that supports both data collection
and live teleconferencing.• EMR connection expanded by Beacon HIE.• Developing one internal medical operating structure for all
telemedicine applications.
59
Proprietary and Confidential59
One Standard Internal Operating SystemeClinic/eOffice/eAdmin/ePortals/EMR interface
Beacon Alpha Summary
Integrated View of Healthcare Provider
60
Proprietary and Confidential
Remote internal
operations
Remote HealthcareProviders
A-VuManagedPlatform
Remote Standard
PCs
Mobile Devices
Complex/SimpleRemote Shared ePortals
BeaconProgram
Development
ResidentialConnections
60
Defined Alpha Requirements
61
Proprietary and Confidential
• Multi-point conferencing.• Multiple image display.• Remote control of PTZ Camera.• Simplified custom UI.• Remotely programmed. • Pre-programmed eSessions.• Automatic eSession
documentation.• Real time data display.• Co-located with access to EMR• EMR upload control.• HIPAA security/privacy compliant• Fixed location
eOffice (Doctor/nurse/other) Shared ePortal (Patient)
• Multi-point conferencing.• Multiple image display.• Two simultaneous sent images.
• Patient PTZ camera.• Other assessment.
• Medical Devices (Blood Pressure, Spirometer, SPO2, Glucose, Weight, Thermometer, Otoscope, Stethoscope.)
• Simplified custom UI.• Remotely programmed. • HIPAA security/privacy compliant• Fixed or mobile configuration
61
WCTN Alpha Partners
62Community Partners
A-Vu Media - Broadband
Project Management
Hiawatha Headend Facility- Central Vidyo Servers
Home &Community Options
- Services to the disabled - Remote residential
management
Other Community- Winona County Services
- Winona Housing & Redevelopment
Hiawatha Broadband- High Capacity fiber Network
- VPN connections
Video
InternetPhone
Networks
Winona Health- Hospital and Clinics
- Assisted living - Nursing Home
- Home Care
Older AdultResidential ServicesSt. Anne of Winona - Assisted Living- Nursing Home
Primary Partnerswireless
Education- Winona Public Schools (K-12)
- Bluffview
# of NetworkConnections
4-20
1-8
2-42-7
2-5
OccupationalMedicine- RTP
- Other
1-3
62
Beacon Enabled HCO ServiceIntegrated View of Home Care Services
63
Proprietary and Confidential
FamilyCaregiver
PrivateResidences
Multi-unitResidences
Mobile Devices
Complex/Simple
GroupHomes
Home Care Service Provider• Care coordination
• Healthcare• Community• Family
• Active Monitoring/PERS• Intervention/Escalation
HealthCare Provider/sTelemedicine Equipped or Traditional
CommunityResources
BeaconProgram
Development
OtherBroadband
Connections
63
Future Expansion• Winona Community Telemedicine Network.
– Additional locations with Alpha participants.– Additional Participants: (Schools, public
housing, nursing homes, county jail) • Other SEMN Locations
– Schools – final locations TBD– Older Adult facilities – final locations TBD– Other disabled service providers – TBD
6464
Planned Impact• Telemedicine implemented at <50% cost of legacy
systems.• Telemedicine endorsed and actively used by 50% of WH
physicians.• Increase EMR assessment data by 300% for Diabetes and
Juvenile Asthma Patients.• Reduce lost work days due to healthcare issues.• HCO Home Care Impact for diabetes and other chronic
conditions:– Reduce medication errors.– Reduce on-site nurse visits and ER visits.
• Document a Sustainable Telemedicine Model.
6565
Questions?
Enable Knowledge discovery in world of data
Patient Outcomes
IT
Satisfy conversations
New models
66
http://semnbeacon.com/
67