50
Mining in the context of sustainable management of natural capital: the importance of waste recycling and reuse Centre for Environmental Policy Environmental Quality Research Presentation at the Industrial Waste & Wastewater Treatment & Valorisation conference 21-23 May 2015, Athens, Greece Dr Nick Voulvoulis Reader in Environmental Technology Head, Environmental Quality Research Group

Mining in the context of sustainable management of natural ...uest.ntua.gr/iwwatv/proceedings/presentations/21... · Mining in the context of sustainable management of natural capital:

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Mining in the context of sustainable management of natural

capital: the importance of waste recycling and reuse

Centre for Environmental PolicyEnvironmental Quality Research

Presentation at the

Industrial Waste & Wastewater Treatment & Valorisation conference21-23 May 2015, Athens, Greece

Dr Nick VoulvoulisReader in Environmental Technology

Head, Environmental Quality Research Group

• Imperial College London embodies and delivers world class scholarship, education and research in science, engineering medicine and business, with particular regard to their application in industry, commerce and healthcare.

Introduction

• The Centre for Environmental Policy at Imperial provides a unique research interface between science and technology and the economic and policy context in which it is developed and applied.

• The Environmental Quality Research Group focuses on the integrated scientific study of the environment with emphasis on waste, water and wastewater management. Complemented by the development and application of tools in sustainability analysis, multi-criteria optimisation and lifecycle assessment.

3

Exhaustible natural resources Inexhaustible natural resources

Renew-able

Inexhaustible

Partly renewableNon-renewable

Conditionallyinexhaustible

Plants Animals

SoilPeat

Mineral deposits

WaterAir

SunWind

Geothermal energyTidal energy

Environmental impacts of mining

• Throughout all of its five lifecycle stages, mining can cause numerous

impacts ranging from soil or water contamination resulting from metalliferous

mining and smelting to corruption of authorities in communities near mining

corporate activities. These can include:

• habitat loss,

• soil contamination,

• contamination of ground and surface water,

• creation of voids or sinkholes and

• physical disturbance for the construction of roads and infrastructure,

among others.

• Contamination caused by mining can affect the health of the local population.

Although physical and economic causalities are often overestimated in life cycle

assessments, as many mines have multiple functions and produce multiple

metals, potential environmental and social risks expose not only mining

companies directly, but also financial institutions, insurance companies, and

metals product buyers who might be subject to consumer pressure.

Prospecting,

Exploration,

Mine development,

Exploitation,

Reclamation.

Linear production and consumption: Conventional Perspective of Materials Flow

Linear Economy

• Production and consumption processes historically, have almost been entirely linear .

While in the past such processes were perhaps considered to be efficient,

consideration of the whole life costs of production and consumption puts a new

perspective on the real net benefits derived from many of these traditional practices.

• The current "take-make-dispose" approach results in massive waste; in the fast-

moving consumer goods sector alone, about 80% of the $3.2 trillion material value is

lost irrecoverably each year.

Source: EEA 2010 derived from SERI GLOBAL 2000, Friends of the Earth Europe (2009)

Simplified world

mining map

Cement Plants:

Chalk Raw Materials

Map showing locations of working

mines and quarries in the United

Kingdom

The Linear Economy

• World as unlimited resource and waste bin;

• 65 billion tonnes of raw materials enter the

economic system, p.a.;

• Around 60% of waste ends up in landfill…

Current economic model of ‘Take-Make-Dispose’

In the EU >€5 billion worth of materials Dumped in landfill or incinerators every year...

If this material was recycled:

• The material would have had a minimum potential monetary value of €5.25 billion.

• We would have saved CO2eq emissions of 148 million tonnes, equivalent to taking approximately 47 million cars off the road

per year.

• Traditionally, economies have

relied on cheap and

accessible energy and

materials, amongst other

factors, to function

effectively.

• High and volatile resource

prices over the last ten years

– with resource scarcity likely

to increase significantly in the

future.

• All the evidence suggests

that the relative decoupling of

growth and resource use will

simply slow the rate of

resource depletion and sharp

rises in material costs will

continue.

Nearly a third of profit warnings issued by FTSE 350

companies in 2011 were attributed to rising resource prices

Impact on Companies

Natural resources make up 45-50% of

costs for the average manufacturing

company;

Labour costs are falling as a percentage

of total costs, whilst materials and

energy costs rise;

Small Business Act (2010) estimates

that better resource use could save

European industry €630billion;

• We are using ever-increasing

quantities of the world’s resources

• Europe is particularly dependant

on imported resources

• There is an urgent need for more

policies to boost eco-efficiency

• The resources agenda will get

more important in future years, as

consumption in large countries –

e.g. China and India – continues

to increase.

• Business pressure is increasing

• E.g. Raw Materials prizes

20

• The future economic development and growth of the human population in many countries will

cause shortage of natural resources, energy, food and water significant for the development of

humanity.

• Global society will face difficult and complex environmental challenges.

Time

Pop

ula

tio

n

Inhabitants

Resources

Halt of the growing

Reso

urc

es

Starvation, wars, migration -

human population reduce

considerably Depletion of the

environmental and

natural resources

Pattern of the human

population/resources in

accordance with Malthus theory

Resource efficiency - More from less

• There is a clear need to re-assess the potential of our consumption in the context of

sustainable resource management and with a renewed focus on its role from a systems

perspective with appropriate pricing that is inclusive of all environmental costs.

• Secure cost-efficient access to secondary raw materials. as a complementary approach

to mining and resource-efficient manufacturing and use of materials

• Move from “waste” management to “resource” management, by prioritising the efficient

recovery of valuable materials from recyclable waste and end-of-life products

Less

Less

Less

Less

Less

Mining in the context of sustainable resources management

• Mining and mineral-processing wastes are one of the world's largest chronic waste concerns.

• If properly evaluated, mining waste can be reused to re-extract minerals, provide additional fuel for power plants, supply construction materials, and repair surface and subsurface land structures altered by mining activities themselves.

Closing the loop: mining in the context of sustainable resources management

• The chemical composition and geotechnical properties of the source rock determine which uses are most appropriate and whether reuse is economically feasible.

• Recycling valuable materials is a highly efficient way of reintroducing them into the economy, hence supporting value creation, while lowering environmental impacts and energy intensity of materials supply.

103

Lr

102

No

101

Md

100

Fm

99

Es

98

Cf

97

Bk

96

Cm

95

Am

94

Pu

93

Np

92

U

91

Pa

90

Th

89

Ac

** Actinides

71

Lu

70

Yb

69

Tm

68

Er

67

Ho

66

Dy

65

Tb

64

Gd

63

Eu

62

Sm

61

Pm

60

Nd

59

Pr

58

Ce

57

La

* Lanthanides

118

Uuo

(117)

(Uus)

116

Uuh

115

Uup

114

Uuq

113

Uut

112

Uub

111

Rg

110

Ds

109

Mt

108

Hs

107

Bh

106

Sg

105

Db

104

Rf

**88

Ra

87

Fr

7

86

Rn

85

At

84

Po

83

Bi

82

Pb

81

Tl

80

Hg

79

Au

78

Pt

77

Ir

76

Os

75

Re

74

W

73

Ta

72

Hf

*56

Ba

55

Cs

6

54

Xe

53

I

52

Te

51

Sb

50

Sn

49

In

48

Cd

47

Ag

46

Pd

45

Rh

44

Ru

43

Tc

42

Mo

41

Nb

40

Zr

39

Y

38

Sr

37

Rb

5

36

Kr

35

Br

34

Se

33

As

32

Ge

31

Ga

30

Zn

29

Cu

28

Ni

27

Co

26

Fe

25

Mn

24

Cr

23

V

22

Ti

21

Sc

20

Ca

19

K

4

18

Ar

17

Cl

16

S

15

P

14

Si

13

Al

12

Mg

11

Na

3

10

Ne

9

F

8

O

7

N

6

C

5

B

4

Be

3

Li

2

2

He

1

H

1

Period

181716151413121110987654321Group

#

103

Lr

102

No

101

Md

100

Fm

99

Es

98

Cf

97

Bk

96

Cm

95

Am

94

Pu

93

Np

92

U

91

Pa

90

Th

89

Ac

** Actinides

71

Lu

70

Yb

69

Tm

68

Er

67

Ho

66

Dy

65

Tb

64

Gd

63

Eu

62

Sm

61

Pm

60

Nd

59

Pr

58

Ce

57

La

* Lanthanides

118

Uuo

(117)

(Uus)

116

Uuh

115

Uup

114

Uuq

113

Uut

112

Uub

111

Rg

110

Ds

109

Mt

108

Hs

107

Bh

106

Sg

105

Db

104

Rf

**88

Ra

87

Fr

7

86

Rn

85

At

84

Po

83

Bi

82

Pb

81

Tl

80

Hg

79

Au

78

Pt

77

Ir

76

Os

75

Re

74

W

73

Ta

72

Hf

*56

Ba

55

Cs

6

54

Xe

53

I

52

Te

51

Sb

50

Sn

49

In

48

Cd

47

Ag

46

Pd

45

Rh

44

Ru

43

Tc

42

Mo

41

Nb

40

Zr

39

Y

38

Sr

37

Rb

5

36

Kr

35

Br

34

Se

33

As

32

Ge

31

Ga

30

Zn

29

Cu

28

Ni

27

Co

26

Fe

25

Mn

24

Cr

23

V

22

Ti

21

Sc

20

Ca

19

K

4

18

Ar

17

Cl

16

S

15

P

14

Si

13

Al

12

Mg

11

Na

3

10

Ne

9

F

8

O

7

N

6

C

5

B

4

Be

3

Li

2

2

He

1

H

1

Period

181716151413121110987654321Group

#

103

Lr

102

No

101

Md

100

Fm

99

Es

98

Cf

97

Bk

96

Cm

95

Am

94

Pu

93

Np

92

U

91

Pa

90

Th

89

Ac

** Actinides

71

Lu

70

Yb

69

Tm

68

Er

67

Ho

66

Dy

65

Tb

64

Gd

63

Eu

62

Sm

61

Pm

60

Nd

59

Pr

58

Ce

57

La

* Lanthanides

118

Uuo

(117)

(Uus)

116

Uuh

115

Uup

114

Uuq

113

Uut

112

Uub

111

Rg

110

Ds

109

Mt

108

Hs

107

Bh

106

Sg

105

Db

104

Rf

**88

Ra

87

Fr

7

86

Rn

85

At

84

Po

83

Bi

82

Pb

81

Tl

80

Hg

79

Au

78

Pt

77

Ir

76

Os

75

Re

74

W

73

Ta

72

Hf

*56

Ba

55

Cs

6

54

Xe

53

I

52

Te

51

Sb

50

Sn

49

In

48

Cd

47

Ag

46

Pd

45

Rh

44

Ru

43

Tc

42

Mo

41

Nb

40

Zr

39

Y

38

Sr

37

Rb

5

36

Kr

35

Br

34

Se

33

As

32

Ge

31

Ga

30

Zn

29

Cu

28

Ni

27

Co

26

Fe

25

Mn

24

Cr

23

V

22

Ti

21

Sc

20

Ca

19

K

4

18

Ar

17

Cl

16

S

15

P

14

Si

13

Al

12

Mg

11

Na

3

10

Ne

9

F

8

O

7

N

6

C

5

B

4

Be

3

Li

2

2

He

1

H

1

Period

181716151413121110987654321Group

#

103

Lr

102

No

101

Md

100

Fm

99

Es

98

Cf

97

Bk

96

Cm

95

Am

94

Pu

93

Np

92

U

91

Pa

90

Th

89

Ac

** Actinides

71

Lu

70

Yb

69

Tm

68

Er

67

Ho

66

Dy

65

Tb

64

Gd

63

Eu

62

Sm

61

Pm

60

Nd

59

Pr

58

Ce

57

La

* Lanthanides

118

Uuo

(117)

(Uus)

116

Uuh

115

Uup

114

Uuq

113

Uut

112

Uub

111

Rg

110

Ds

109

Mt

108

Hs

107

Bh

106

Sg

105

Db

104

Rf

**88

Ra

87

Fr

7

86

Rn

85

At

84

Po

83

Bi

82

Pb

81

Tl

80

Hg

79

Au

78

Pt

77

Ir

76

Os

75

Re

74

W

73

Ta

72

Hf

*56

Ba

55

Cs

6

54

Xe

53

I

52

Te

51

Sb

50

Sn

49

In

48

Cd

47

Ag

46

Pd

45

Rh

44

Ru

43

Tc

42

Mo

41

Nb

40

Zr

39

Y

38

Sr

37

Rb

5

36

Kr

35

Br

34

Se

33

As

32

Ge

31

Ga

30

Zn

29

Cu

28

Ni

27

Co

26

Fe

25

Mn

24

Cr

23

V

22

Ti

21

Sc

20

Ca

19

K

4

18

Ar

17

Cl

16

S

15

P

14

Si

13

Al

12

Mg

11

Na

3

10

Ne

9

F

8

O

7

N

6

C

5

B

4

Be

3

Li

2

2

He

1

H

1

Period

181716151413121110987654321Group

#END OF LIFE RECYCLING RATE (GLOBAL) FOR 62 METALS

UNEP EVALUATION JANUARY, 2010

>50% >25-50% >10-25% 1-10% <1% ???

EUROPEAN UNION – WEEE EXAMPLE

• Only 30% of weee collected is properly recycled

• Less than 1% of the critical raw materials in weee is recovered out of

that 30%

• Less than 15% of precious metals are recovered

• Recycling technologies and systems works well for high volume

materials in less complex products (steel, plastic, paper)

EU MSW Recycling rates

There comes the circular economy

• Developed initially as a response to resources scarcity, is now impelled by the emerging world view that real economic growth needs to be fully aligned with sound environmental stewardship and social development in order to last

• The circular economy has emerged as a viable and attractive business model.

• The circular economy offers net materials cost savings in addition to opportunities for economic growth decoupled from resource consumption.

Economy’s ability to grow while resource use is declining

Responding to a real demand and pressure on resources, with appropriate pricing that is inclusive of all environmental costs, and with new opportunities in the wastes we generate, mining can become a sustainable economic activity.

Circular economy – Closing the loop Rather than releasing high quality wastes back into the environment while simultaneously paying to

extract it as minerals through traditional mining of raw materials, it makes more sense to close the loop

in terms of sustainability and energy efficiency.

The economic, environmental and sustainability benefits

The mining industry still faces challenges at all stages of the metals value chain, but recovery from

wastes is an important issue. In Europe for example, this is limited by leakage of waste outside of

Europe, to the continued lack of implementing measures to reduce landfilling in several EU Member

States

Closing the loop: Moving Towards a Closed System of Energy and Material Flows

Closing the loopClosed System of Linear Energy and Materials Flows

Industrial symbiosis

A system is sustainable if, over its lifetime, it produces more than

it consumes, puts back more than it takes and is able to provide

for most of its own needs.

Symbiosis as a closed loop value chain, an example of a circular economy of an urban centre

Industrial Symbiosis

A system is sustainable if, over its lifetime, it produces more than it consumes.

collaboration

replaces

competition

Cooperation beats

competition

RemediateEnd of Pipe

Recycle

Reuse

Redesign

Rethink‘It is the toast we want, not the toaster’

http://www.core77.com/blog/business/sustainability_through_resource_efficiency_focus_on_the_toast_not_the_toaster_21661.asp

IncreaseReduce

Policy Stability: Barrier

IncreaseReduce

Policy Stability: Barrier

Product use Service increase

From products to services

From products to services

Increasing product life and therefore encouraging people to

re-use or keep products for longer, is another attribute of

the circular economy.

The circular economy encourages people to keep products

for longer, which in turn creates business opportunities for

service packages that include repairs and maintenance

services and drive customer loyalty.

System innovation focusing on optimising the performance

of a product leading to its replacement by a service is

accompanied by both a significant decrease in material

consumption but not in economic gains.

From products to services

Service provision is often an economic activity where the buyer does not generally, except by exclusive contract, obtain exclusive ownership of the thing

purchased.

By composing and orchestrating the appropriate level of resources, skill, ingenuity, and experience for effecting specific benefits for service consumers,

service providers participate in an economy without the restrictions of carrying stock (inventory) or the

need to concern themselves with bulky raw materials.

A model of the resource and decisions inputs to providing a service. Source: Pears, A. (2004)Pears, A. (2004) Energy Efficiency – Its Potential: Some Perspectives and Experiences, Background paper for International Energy Agency Energy Efficiency Workshop, Paris, p 8. Available at http://www.naturaledgeproject.net/Documents/IEAENEFFICbackgroundpaperPearsFinal.pdf.

The range of potential technologies that can be used to provide the service of clean

clothes, and the dependence of each technology on energy resources (Pears, A., 2003)

Pears, A. (2004) Energy Efficiency – Its Potential: Some Perspectives and Experiences, Background paper for International Energy Agency Energy Efficiency Workshop, Paris, p 8. Available at

http://www.naturaledgeproject.net/Documents/IEAENEFFICbackgroundpaperPearsFinal.pdf

From products to services

Circular Economy Light bulbs

Selling light as a service makes LED lighting more desirable for

consumers, ensures a circular flow of the bulb’s critical materials

and reduces the lifetime energy consumption of lighting.

The paradigm shift in environmental protection

Meta-system optimization

System optimization

Sub-system optimization

Fighting symptoms

• The mining industry still faces challenges at all stages of the metals value chain, but recovery from wastes is an important issue.

• In Europe for example, this is limited by leakage of waste outside of Europe, to the continued lack of implementing measures to reduce landfilling in several EU Member States.

• A Circular Economy Package currently in discussion could address some of these : • Secure cost-efficient access to secondary raw materials. as a complementary approach to

mining and resource-efficient manufacturing and use of materials• Move from “waste” management to “resource” management, by prioritising the efficient

recovery of valuable materials from recyclable waste and end-of-life products.

The way forward

Mining and waste industries at the heart of the

circular economy• Challenges for environmental policy

will increase in the future and the

role of mining will be central to any

discussions.

• The question remains if mining will

be perceived as part of the problem

or part of the solution for a

sustainable future.

• Before that, mining companies

might soon face the choice between

two roles: that of exploiters of

natural resources or that of

managers of natural resources

cycles.

…but then again ,who needs to change?

survival is optional…

From products to services