Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Mineral oils in vegetable oils: tools for the analysis of the saturated and the
aromatic hydrocarbons
Koni Grob
Kantonales Labor Zürich
10
15
Crude Arabian light
Kerosene
Distillation
Short introduction into mineral oil depicted by GC
Heating oil, Diesel oil
10
15
20
25
Short introduction into mineral oil depicted by GC
main components:
branched and cyclicMOSH
15-25 % MOAH
Terminology
- MOSH: mineral oil saturated hydrocarbons (paraffins and naphthenes)- MOAH: mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons
Vaselinee.g. for cosmetics, pharmaceuticals
15
20
25
25
30
High boiling fraction;„white oil“: only MOSH;
extracted and hydrogenated
Short introduction into mineral oil depicted by GC
Wax (candle)
18
20
25 30
35
Crystallized fractionAlmost exclusively
n-alkanes
Short introduction into mineral oil depicted by GC
46 ºC 15 º/min 340 ºC
Diesel oil
Shell
BP
Total
21
28
35
29
27
2036
1711
Lubricating oil(motor oil)
Residue fromcrystallization
High boiling point (to avoid evaporation)
high viscosity(lubrication)
� high molecular mass
Must remain liquid also at low temperature
� removal of n-alkanes
Short introduction into mineral oil depicted by GC
20
25
30P
rista
ne
Ph
yta
ne
20
25
30
Prista
ne
Ph
yta
ne
1718
Hydraulic oil (building machinery)
Chain oil for motor saw
Short introduction into mineral oil depicted by GC
Environmental
contributionsDiesel exhaust
Soot 1
Soot 2
Tar road pavement
40
28
34
20
28
1718
25
30
30
40
50
46 ºC 15 º/min 340 ºC
16
25
18
25
1822
20
27
46 ºC 15 º/min 340 ºC
Aerosol from road tunnel
40
Exhaust from hot
diesel engine
lubricating oil
incompletely
burned fuel
residue fromdistillation
mainly
lubricating oil
Soot from
chimney
Exhaust from cold
diesel engine
Aerosol from
road tunnel
20
30
40
50
28
35
27
20
40
22
29
22
18
23
34
46 ºC 15 º/min 340 ºC
25
Lip stick 145 %
Lip stick 260 %
Vaseline100 %
Vaseline body lotion 36 %
Body lotion8 %
Hand crème1.1 %
Oints and salves
46 ºC 15 º/min 340 ºC
3036
31 37
40
20
28
40
20
38
40
Almond oil cream3.4 %
Nipple cream0.03 %
Vulnerary balsam40 %
Mastoid salve31 %
Vulnerary balsam17 %
2923 2923
85 mg/kg 60 mg/kg
15 mg/kg 360 mg/kg
A B
C D
Mineral oil in human body fat Abdominal fat from Cesarean sections (Bregenz und Innsbruck)
N. Concin et al., Food and Chemical Toxicology, 46 (2008) 544-552
Extremes in distribution
Extremes in concentrations
Toxicological evaluation
2923 2923
85 mg/kg 60 mg/kg
15 mg/kg 360 mg/kg
A B
C D
Mineral oil in human body fat Abdominal fat from Cesarean sections (Bregenz und Innsbruck)
Toxicological evaluation
average person contains~ 1 g mineral oil,
high levels: 10 g
no animal is as contaminated as humans
Samples 24
46 ºC 15 º/min 340 ºC
after 7 days42 mg/kg
after 14 days8 mg/kg
29
17
21
34
25
maximum determined: 1300 mg/kg fat!
Human milk
Toxicological evaluation
Hopanes as markers for mineral originengine (lubricating) oil, LC-GC-MS
Paraffins
Hopanes
80 °C 320 °C25 °/min 230 °C 8 °/min
Paraffins, m/z 81Hopanes, m/z 191
T. Populin, M. Biedermann, K. Grob, S. Moret, L. Conte. Food Addit. Contam. 21 (2004) 893-904
Toxicological evaluation
Hopanes in human milk� proof for mineral origin
80 °C 320 °C25 °/min 230 °C 8 °/min
Hopane segment
Hopanes
ParaffinsT
m
29αβ 30αβ
31αβS
35αβS
Toxicological evaluation
Toxicological evaluation WHO/JECFA
http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_913.pdf
• Relevant end points: accumulation in certain organs, reaction toforeign body (inflammation), increased weight of organs
• strong dependence by molecular mass
– viscosity (correlations? not measurable for contaminants)
– average molecular mass
– carbon number at 5 % distillation point (C-number at 5 % lowest molecular mass)
Toxicological evaluation
JECFA criteria for evaluating MOSH
27.5
36
20
5 % lowest
C23.5
average molecular mass
ADI of 10 mg/kg bw:
- average molecular mass 480-500 Da (C34)
- carbon number at 5 % distillation point: C25
���� typical lubricant oilsdo not comply
typical motor oil
Toxicological evaluation
Toxicological evaluation
mineralparaffins
28
26
72 °C (eluent evaporation)
temperature program 25 °C/min
350 °C
21
1729 31272523
C25natural
n-alkanes
terpenes
C34
JECFA-limits shouldeven be higher
Toxicological evaluation
MOSH accumulated by humans
Legal limit to be derived from JECFA
• ADI of oils with 5 % dist. point ≥C25 and average
molecular mass ≥480 Da: 0.01 mg/kg bw
• conventional assumptions for calculating limits
– 60 kg bw � 60 x 0.01 mg/d = tolerable dose 0.6 mg/d
– presence in 1 kg food
• most food are contaminated
• many sources
�0.6 mg/kg food
• many foods exceed this limit
• limit never written
Toxicological evaluation
...and the MOAH?
• JECFA-definition: „mixtures of highly refined paraffinic and naphthenic liquid hydrocarbons… “
• accepted in foods: „white“ oils
– extracted
– hydrogenated
– <1 % MOAH
• most mineral oils in food contain 15-35 % MOAH
• 97-99 % alkylated
– enormous number of isomers
– underestimated when analyzing the non-alkylated PAH
• no toxicological evaluation available
Toxicological evaluation
Principals for the methods of analysis
• FID as detector
– only detector with equal response for all hydrocarbons (calibration!)
• analysis by GC
– distinction from natural paraffins
– characterization of mineral oil
• broad humps of unresolved components
� MOSH and MOAH must be isolated from all other components
• interference of olefins (terpenes, squalene and
isomerizazion products, carotenes)
– MOSH: maximized selectivity of silica gel or increasing retention by bromination or epoxidation
Tool box for MOSH and MOAH analysis
• manual method for MOSH (� attachment)– silica gel column
– 50 ul injection (on-column or CSR splitless)
– epoxidation of interfering olefins
• on-line HPLC-GC or HPLC-HPLC-GC-FID for MOSH– standard method
– removal of plant n-alkanes by activated aluminum oxide
– reduced detection limit: enrichment by double-bed off-line LC
• on-line HPLC-GC for MOAH– direct analysis
– epoxidation of interfering olefins
– enrichment by off-line LC
• characterizing MOAH by GCxGC– by ring type or ring number
Withoutbromination
Internalstandards With
bromination
Manual method for MOSH analysis
Mitt.
Lebensm
. H
yg.
92 (
2001
) 231-2
49
Removal of
interfering olefinsbromination (method 2001)
used frying oil
Withbromination
Withoutbromination
Removal of olefinsbromination
Acids from oil refining
Internalstandards
Manual method for MOSH analysis
Paraffin fraction
Subsequent fraction
Silica gel from the bottle
Mineral paraffins
Isomerizedsqualene
Squalene+ isomers
C14
C16
C40
C14
Insufficient preseparation: mineral paraffins would beoverestimated!
Refined olive oil
from canned fish
Manual method for MOSH analysis
Paraffin fraction
Subsequent fraction
Mineral paraffins
Position of isomerized squalene
isomerized squalene
Silica gel heatedto 300 °C/12 h
Isomerized squalenetransferred to nextfraction or not eluted
Squaleneand mostisomersretained
Manual method for MOSH analysis
Refined olive oil
from canned fish
Paraffin fraction
Subsequent fraction
Mineral paraffins (60 mg/kg)
still noisomerized squalene
- Silica gel heatedto 300 °C/12 h
- Epoxidation(� attachment)
Isomerized squaleneeliminated
Manual method for MOSH analysis
Refined olive oil
from canned fish
on-line HPLC-HPLC-GC-FID
LC-LC-GC method for MOSH
• Direct injection of the (diluted) oil
• Isolation of the hydrocarbons from the fat/oil by first column
– Injection of 20 mg oil provides adequate sensitivity
– 2 mm i.d. column to match flow rate with transfer rate to GC
– 25 cm length to provide capacity for retaining oil (used to about 40%)
– Backflush with MTBE to remove bulk of oil after each run
• Fine separation on second column (olefins)
– Highly active silica � large internal surface area
• Transfer by partially concurrent eluent evaporation
– on-column or Y- interface
Dilution of the oil
Isolation of hydrocarbonson silica gel
Fine separation(removal of olefins) on
silica gel
GC-FID
Backflush with MTBE
Transfer to GC by retention gap technique
LC-LC-GC method for MOSH
Details � attachment
Thermo Electron, 2004
Mineral paraffins
Mineral paraffins24
23
25
2729
31
33
35
24
23
25 27 29
31
33
GC overloaded by plant n-alkanes
Incomplete separation of overloaded plant n-alkanes hindersdetermination of uppercontour line of the hump
Two (different) olive pomace oils
Insufficient sensitivity. Injecting more samplewould overload plant n-alkanes
� Removal of plant n-alkanes
Removal of long-chain n-alkanes by activated aluminium oxide
MOSH?
MOSH?
Retention of long-chain n-alkanes
by activated aluminum oxide
Removal of long-chain n-alkanes by activated aluminium oxide
Luboil
C24
C27
C30
C20
4 8 12 16 20Retention time (min)
C28
Isoalkanes(lubricating oil)
• 10 cm x 2 mm i.d. HPLC column filled with
aluminium oxide activated at 400 °C
• hexane (ca. 60 % n-hexane),
purified over aluminium oxide
• 300 µl/min
• Evaporative light scattering detection (ELSD)
n-alkanes• No significant retention for
isoalkanes (motor/lubricating oil)
• No significant retention for n-C20
• Rapidly increasing retention of longer chain n-alkanes
Unknown retention mechanism
Luboil
C24
C27
C30
C20
4 8 12 16 20Retention time (min)
C28
Isoalkanes(lubricating oil)
n-alkanes
Well fits our interests:- plant n-alkanes usually >C23;- dominant plant n-alkanes: C27-C33- most fuel oil n-alkanes <C20
Fraction to beanalyzed by GC
Retention of long-chain n-alkanes
by activated aluminum oxide
Removal of long-chain n-alkanes by activated aluminium oxide
Influence of the mobile phase
Isooctane
Cyclohexane
C32
C30
C34
C32
C30
C28
C24
Luboil
C28
C24
Luboil
C34
C28
C24
Luboil
Luboil
n-Pentane
n-Hexane
C32
C30
Complete collapse
� useful for rinsingthe column
Removal of long-chain n-alkanes by activated aluminium oxide
suitable for
preseparation
Performance for jute batching oil
15
20
23
20
15
25
MOSH fraction
Subsequentfraction
Aromatics furtherretained
Increased retention for n-alkanesas from C15
complete retention above C23
also for certain isoalkanes
Elution up to C25
higher molecular mass n-alkanesfurther retained
Removal of long-chain n-alkanes by activated aluminium oxide
22 34
18
Loss of high molecular mass isoalkanes
Mineral paraffins in a body lotion
no loss
loss18 %
Removal of long-chain n-alkanes by activated aluminium oxide
Concept for use in on-line LC-LC-GC
• Isolation of the paraffins by silicagel
– no alox: backflush with strong eluent would deactivate alox
• Aluminium oxide for second column
• Removal of retained n-alkanesby isooctane
• 10 cm x 2 mm aluminiumoxide column (ca. 300 mg)
– fraction volume remains at 300 µl
– flow rate suiting LC-GC transfer (300 µl/min) suits 2 mm i.d. column
Diluting the oil
Isolation of hydrocarbonson silica gel
Removal of plant n-alkanes by
aluminium oxide
GC-FID
Backflush with
dichloromethane
Rinsing withiso-octane
Removal of long-chain n-alkanes by activated aluminium oxide
Flow system
Pump 1(hexane)
Autosampler
Waste
Injection
Valve 2
Silic
a g
el c
olu
mn
Waste
Waste
Valve 1
Transfervalve
Alu
min
ium
oxid
e
Waste
to GC(transfer lineto on-column
injector)
Purge oftransfer line
Pump 2 (isooctane)
100 µL injection
loop
Backflushloop (1 mL)
MTBE(pressurizedreservoir)
Resistance
Removal of long-chain n-alkanes by activated aluminium oxide
J.
Agric.
Food C
hem
. 57 (
20
09)
8711-8
72
1
x1 x1
27
25
31
33
27
2533
31
23
29
SiO2 SiO2
Oil 1 Oil 2
29
Application to olive pomace (sansa) oils
x6x4
Alox 400 °C Alox 400 °C
SiO2 SiO2
Removal of long-chain n-alkanes by activated aluminium oxide
reducedattenuation!
Application to corn oil25
27
29
23
29
31
25
23
27
SiO2
Alox 400 °C
x8x8
3 mg/kg
Removal of long-chain n-alkanes by activated aluminium oxide
Lower detection limit: off-line enrichment
• detection limit <0.3 mg/kg oil
• e.g. for determining environmental contribution
• presupposes
– larger aliquot of fat/oil
– removal of plant n-alkanes
• required packed beds are too large for on-line LC-GC� off-line preseparation
� attachment
Alu
min
um
oxid
eS
ilica g
elRetention of fat
(triglycerides)
Retention of unsaturated hydrocarbons
Retention of long chain n-alkanes
Enrichment to decrease detection limit
25 °/min 350 °C
27
29 31
23C
ala
ren
e
25 °/min 350 °C 25 °/min 350 °C25 °/min 350 °C65 °C65 °C
On-line Si-Si-GC
Off-line Si-Al +on-line Si-Al-GC
Off-line Si-Al +on-line Si-Al-GCattenuated
65 °C65 °C
24
25
2324
25
3127
On-line Si-Al-GC
20
22
12
13
Example: sunflower oil
Enrichment to decrease detection limit
1.4 mg/kg
Determination of the mineral oil aromatic
hydrocarbons (MOAH)
• HPLC preseparation on highly retentive silica gel
– Lichrospher Si 60 (25 cm x 2 mm i.d.)
• hexane purified over activated silica gel
– MOSH fraction
• rapid gradient to 30 % dichloromethane � MOAH
– start: highly alkylated benzenes
– end: non-alkylated perylene
• verification standards monitor accurate cuts
Determination of the sum of the MOAH
Interference of olefins: selective epoxidation
• Olefins eluted in MOAH fraction: squalene + isomerization products, sterenes, carotenes, terpenes
• broad fraction: no chance of separation
• derivatization of olefins increases LC retention time
• reaction should not affect MOAH
– bromination is not selective (MOAH largely react also)
– epoxidation most selective
• most sensitive: thiophenes
Determination of the sum of the MOAH
Concept of epoxidation
• reaction faster with olefins than with (most) MOAH
• faster than with fatty acids
� peracid added at ~10 % of consumption by fatty acids
– reaction with fatty acids eliminates peracid
– fatty acids added if not present
– cooling enhances selectivity
• nevertheless: 15-30 % lossof MOAH
Determination of the sum of the MOAH
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 50 100 150 200
Amount mCPBA (mg)
Pre
sen
ce r
ela
ted
to
in
itia
l
co
ncen
trati
on
(%
)
Fluorene, phenanthrene, chrysene
MOAH
Dibenzothiophene
SterenesSqualene
50 °C 20 °/min 350 °C50 °C 20 °/min 350 °C
6B
BP
TBB
9B
Sq
ua
lene
Ste
renes
Ca
rote
no
ids
Sq
ua
lene
Mineralaromatics
Ste
renes
No epoxidation
25 mg mCPBA/300 mg oil
100 mg mCPBA/300 mg oil
Margarine Rapeseed oil
100 mg/kg
15 mg/kg
no epoxidation
25 mg peracid
100 mg peracid
MOAH
Sample enrichment for MOAH
• lower concentration than MOSH: enrichment frequently necessary
• elimination of lipids
• MOAH must pass into fraction
• 12 g silica gel to retain 1 g of oil or fat
• 20 % dichloromethane/hexane
• enrichment by factor 50
Determination of the sum of the MOAH
Safflower oil Rapeseed oil
by epoxidation anddirect HPLC-GC-FID
after enrichment
50 °C 20 °/min 350 °C 50 °C 20 °/min 350 °C
MOSH
Wa
x es
ters
5.5 mg kg-1
2.5 mg kg-1
30 mg kg-1
55 mg kg-1
1214 16
3 mg kg-1
6B
BP TBB9B
1 mg kg-1
0.2 mg kg-1
MOSH
MOAH
MOAH
epoxidized, direct
enriched
after epoxidation; no enrichment
21
2325 31
Sq
uale
ne
Sq
uale
ne
direct analysis
MOAH enriched and epoxidized
50 °C 20 °/min 350 °C
4 mg kg-1
55 mg kg-1
320 mg kg-1
21 mg kg-1
12 1416
3 mg kg-1
1 mg kg-1
6B
BP
TBB
9B
0.2 mg kg-1
Refined olive oil Olive pomace oil
MOSH
MOAH
MOAH
21 mg/kg320 mg/kg
55 mg/kg
4 mg/kg
direct
epoxidized, direct
epoxidized, enriched
Characterization of MOAH
• MOAH are alkylated to 95 to >99 % � extremely complex mixture
– PAH from pyrolysis are little alkylated
– analysis not by individual components � group type
– no calibration by MS or spectroscopic detectors � FID
Characterization of MOAH
Na
ph
tha
len
e
C1
-Na
ph
tha
len
es
Naphthalenes 8.2 % of thebatching oil
Dibenzothiophenes 3.1 %
Jute batching oil;
preseparation by NPLC
(amino silica), LC-GC
(M. Biedermann, 1991)
LC-solvent evaporator-LC-(GC)
LC column 1 LC-column 2Solvent evaporator
(SE)
UV detector
GC system
FID
- Reduction of the fraction volume
- Exchange of the eluent
Va
cu
um
Sabrina Moret, K. Grob, and L.S. Conte, J. Chromatogr. 750 (1996) 361-368
Characterization of MOAH
Linseed oilcontaminated from
jute bag
LC-SE-LC-UV
Characterization of MOAH
Analysis by GCxGC
60 °C 360 °C5 °/min
30
25
20
15
1st dimension GC
2n
d d
ime
nsio
n G
C (
s)
0
1
2
3
4
60 °C 360 °C5 °/min
1st dimension GC
3035
45
40
25
20
Crude fraction for lubricating oilBatching oil
GC-FID (no modulation)
GCxGC-FID(modulated)
30252015
403520 25 30
Paraffins
Aromatics
Characterization of MOAH
Separation by ring number
B
Phe + An
BT
DBT
BDBT
N
ChryBPy
Flu + Py
Fluo
Benzenes
2-Rings
3-Rings
4-Rings
5-Rings
2n
d d
imen
sio
n G
C (
s)
1
2
3
4
1st dimension GC
TAS
80 °C 305 °C
5 °/min
Characterization of MOAH
Lubricating oil
DAE extender oil
Extender oil from handle
Tar from wood furnace
5-Rings
4-Rings
3-Rings
2-Rings
Benzenes
Per
BP
6B TBB
9B
5-Rings
4-Rings
3-Rings
2-Rings
Benzenes
5-Rings
4-Rings
3-Rings
2-Rings
Benzenes
5-Rings
4-Rings
3-Rings
2-Rings
Benzenes
Per
Per Per
Characterization of MOAH
Quantitative estimation by integration of grid of 2nd dimension chromatograms
BP
6B TBB
9B
5-Rings4-Rings
3-Rings
2-Rings
Benzenes
1st dimention GC retention times (min) 1 2 3 4
2nd dimension GC (s)
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
512 3
4
1
2
34
1
1
23
51 2 3 4
51 2 3 4
2
3 4
1
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Per
Squalene
Sterenes
Contaminated crude Ukrainian sunflower oil
Characterization of MOAH
exam
ple
BP
6B TBB
9B
5-Rings4-Rings
3-Rings
2-Rings
Benzenes
1st dimention GC retention times (min) 1 2 3 4
2nd dimension GC (s)
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
512 3
4
1
2
34
1
1
23
51 2 3 4
51 2 3 4
2
3 4
1
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Per
Squalene
Sterenes
Contaminated crude Ukrainian sunflower oil
Characterization of MOAH
exam
ple
Time 1 ring 2 rings 3 rings 4 rings 5 rings
(min) (% referring to aromatics)
25 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0
30 1.6 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.0
35 4.9 4.5 4.2 1.4 0.0
40 8.7 9.0 12.1 5.8 0.3
45 5.3 7.0 9.5 7.4 1.3
50 2.6 2.7 3.1 2.9 1.0
55 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.3
Sum 24.0 24.7 30.3 18.1 2.8
Benzenes
Naphthalenes + Benzothiophenes
Fluorenes
3-Ring compounds
4-Ring compounds
MOAH
1
2
3
2nd
dim
ensio
n G
C (
s)
1st dimension GC
90 °C 280 °C5 °/min
Benzenes
2-Ring compounds
3-Ring compounds
4-Ring compounds
Per
6B BP
TBB
9B
Per
Mineral oil for printing newspaper
Crude oil (jutebatching oil)
Oil for printing inks
partly hydrogenated
Characterization of MOAH
4-Rings
other 3-RingsFluorenes
2-Rings
Benzenes
4-Rings
other 3-RingsFluorenes
2-Rings
Benzenes
ISIS
IS
ISISIS
IS
IS
IS
ISBatching oil
Newspaper
MOAH
Attachments
Method proposed during EU workshop 2008
in Zürich
• 6 ml glass tube
• 2 g silica gel activated 400 °C/overnight (dry packing)
• 250 mg fat or oil loaded onto column
– option: epoxidation for better removal of olefins
• 3 ml of eluate
• 50 µl injection
• GC-FID
Manual method for MOSH analysis
Silica gel versus aluminum oxide- does not retained n-alkanes- has a higher capacity to retain oil� doubled sample concentration
Techniques for large volume injection
• On-column– classical retention gap technique: 50 µl
– with vapor exit: 100-1000 µl
• PTV (programmed temperature vaporizing)– splitless: 30 µl
– solvent splitting: up to 500 µl
• Conventional splitless injection– concurrent solvent recondensation: 50 µl
– with vapor exit: 250 µl
Manual method for MOSH analysis
1. On-column or PTV injector
2. Deactivated uncoated precolumn…
8 m x 0.32 mm i.d. or
5 m x 0.53 mm ID
3. …coupled to separation column by press-fit
4. Oven temperature closely below pressure-corrected solvent boiling point
estimated maximum: standard boiling point + 1 °/10 kPa
5. Oven program started at end of solvent evaporation (end of solvent peak), some 2-4 min after injection
6. Injection rate 5 µl/s
Rules for 50 µl on-column injection
Manual method for MOSH analysis
Rules for LV-CSR splitless injection
• Uncoated precolumn
– 8 m x 0.32 mm i.d. or
– 5 m x 0.53 mm i.d.
• Injector liner with 1 cm plug deactivated glass wool
– slightly above column entrance
– column entrance near bottom of vaporizing chamber
• Injector temperature suitable for solutes (370 °C)
• Column temperature closely below the pressure-corrected solvent boiling point estimated as b.p. + 1 °/10 kPa
• Fast injection with short needle
• Temperature program started after end of solvent evaporation (end of solvent peak)
• Duration of splitless period: 3-4 min
– warming up of evaporation site
Con
cu
rre
nt
so
lven
t re
con
den
sa
tio
nla
rge
sam
ple
vo
lum
esplit
less
inje
ctio
n.
P.
Ma
gn
i an
d T
. P
orz
ano
. J.
Sep.
Sci. 1
7 (
20
03
) 1
491
-149
8
La
rge
vo
lum
e s
plit
less
inje
ctio
n w
ith
con
cu
rren
t so
lven
t re
cond
en
sa
tion
: keep
ing t
he
sa
mp
le in
pla
ce
in
th
e h
ot
va
po
rizin
g c
ha
mber.
M.
Bie
de
rman
n,
A.
Fis
ca
lini an
d K
. G
rob
. J.
Sep
. S
ci. 2
7 (
20
04
) 1
157
-1165
Manual method for MOSH analysis
Epoxidation to enhance retention of olefins
1. Precisely weigh ca. 250 mg fat or oil into 4.5 ml vial with screw cap
2. add 1-1.5 ml chloroform
3. add 1 µl IS solution/10 mg sample (e.g. 25 µl/250 mg)
4. add ∼ 50 mg 3-chloroperbenzoic acid
5. close vial and shake; all should be dissolved (add more chloroform otherwise)
6. reaction: 30 min at RT
7. wash with 1-1.5 ml 10 % sodium sulfite; discard upper phase
8. wash with 1-1.5 ml 10 % sodium bicarbonate; discard upper phase
9. wash with 1-1.5 ml water; discard upper phase
10. transfer chloroform phase to 1.5 ml vial and remove chloroform by flow of nitrogen
11. add 250 µl hexane and transfer to column…
Manual method for MOSH analysis
Peak area: option 1, integration
20
29
23
1. Integration of all peaks• straight baseline
• baseline from blank chromatogram
2. Integration of peaks on top of the hump
3. Mineral oil = difference
integrated range
Manual method for MOSH analysis
Option 2: approximation by triangle(s)
20
29
23
Baseline from a blank chromatogram
1. Measure area of hump forcalibration in mm2
F= (b*h)/2
2. Do the same for the sample;use the same attenuation!
3. n-Alkanes considered byadding to the triangle
b
h
Manual method for MOSH analysis
Method
• 20 % oil in hexane: 300 mg/1.5 ml autosampler vial
• 100 µl injection
• LC: 300 µl/min hexane– purified through aluminium oxide, redistilled
• Column 1: 25 cm x 2 mm i.d. Spherisorb Si 5 µm
• Column 2: 25 cm x 2 mm i.d. Lichrospher Si 60 5 µm
• Backflush of column 1 with 1 ml MTBE after 3 min (4 min)
• GC oven during transfer: 60 °C (7.5 min)
• Carrier gas inlet pressure: 50 kPa (hydrogen)– during transfer: 25 kPa
• Solvent vapor exit closed: 4.4 min
• Temperature program rate, 25 °C/min to 360 °C
LC-LC-GC method for MOSH
Lower detection limit: off-line enrichment
• e.g. for determining environmental contribution
• requires
– more fat/oil
– removal of plant n-alkanes
• 7 g activated silica gel
– capacity for 1 g fat
• 20 g activated aluminium oxide
– retention of 2 mg n-alkanes
• 25 ml fraction with hexane
• analyzed by on-line LC-GC
• detection limit <0.5 mg/kg
Alu
min
um
oxid
eS
ilica g
elRetention of fat
(triglycerides)
Retention of unsaturated hydrocarbons
Retention of long chain n-alkanes
Enrichment to decrease detection limit
Determination of the sum of the MOAH
Blank
Motor oil
100 % CH Cl2 2
100 % hexane
Backflush, 500 µL min -1
300 µL min -1
Fra
ctio
n o
f th
e M
OS
H
Fra
ctio
n o
f th
e M
OA
H
HPLC
Saturates (MOSH)
Aromatics (MOAH)
30 % CH C2 2l
Per
12
1416
6B
BP9P
TBB
Cho
Per
GC-FID
Reconditioning, 500 µL min -1
J.
Agric.
Food C
hem
. 57 (
20
09)
8711-8
72
1
References• Coupled LC-GC: Capacity of Silica Gel (HP)LC Columns for Retaining Fat. Grob, I. Kälin, and A. Artho. J. High Resol.
Chromatogr. 14 (1991) 373-376.• LC-GC analysis of the aromatics in a mineral oil: batching oil for jute bags. K. Grob, M. Biedermann, A. Caramaschi, and B.
Pacciarelli. J. High Resol. Chromatogr. 14 (1991) 33-39.• On-line HPLC (LC)-solvent evaporation (SE)-LC-capillary GC-FID for the analysis of mineral oil polyaromatic hydrocarbons in
fatty foods. S. Moret, K. Grob, and L.S. Conte. J. Chromatogr. 750 (1996) 361-368.• Mineral Oil Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons in Foods, e.g. from Jute Bags, by on-line LC-Solvent Evaporation (SE)-LC-GC-FID. S.
Moret, K. Grob, and L.S. Conte. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 204 (1997) 241-246.• Determination of mineral paraffins in feeds and foodstuffs by bromination and preseparation on aluminium oxide: method and
results of a ring test. Ch. Wagner, H.-P. Neukom, V. Galetti and K. Grob. Mitt. Lebensm. Hyg. 92 (2001) 231-249.• Mineral paraffins in vegetable oils and refinery by-products for animal feeds. Ch. Wagner, H.-P. Neukom, K. Grob S. Moret, T.
Populin, and L. S. ConteMitt. Lebensm. Hyg. 92 (2001), 499-514.
• Food contamination by C20-C50 mineral paraffins from the atmosphere. H.-P. Neukom, K. Grob, M. Biedermann, A. Noti. Atmospheric Environment 36 (2002) 4839-4847.
• Occurrence of C15-C45 mineral paraffins in olives and olive oils. S. Moret, T. Populin, L. S. Conte, K. Grob and H.-P. Neukom. Food Additives and Contaminants 20 (2003) 417-426.
• Exposure of babies to C15-C45 mineral paraffins from human milk and breast salves. A. Noti, K. Grob, M. Biedermann, U. Deiss, B. J. Brüschweiler. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 38 (2003) 317-325.
• Mineral oil paraffins in human body fat and milk. N. Concin, G. Hofstetter, B. Plattner, C. Tomovski, K. Fiselier, K. Gerritzen, S. Fessler, G. Windbichler, A. Zeimet, H. Ulmer, H. Siegl, K. Rieger, H. Concin, K. Grob. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 46 (2008) 544-552.
• Contamination of grape seed oil with mineral oil paraffins. D. Fiorini, K. Fiselier, M. Biedermann, R. Ballini, E. Coni, and K. Grob. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58 (2008) 11245-11250.
• Activated aluminum oxide selectively retaining long chain n-alkanes. Part I, description of the retention properties. K. Fiselier, D. Fiorini, K. Grob. Analytica Chimica Acta 634 (2009) 96–101.
• Activated aluminum oxide selectively retaining long chain n-alkanes. Part II, integration into an on-line HPLC-LC-GC-FID method to remove plant paraffins for the determination of mineral paraffins in foods and environmental samples. K. Fiselier, D. Fiorini, K. Grob. Analytica Chimica Acta 634 (2009) 102–109.
• How "white" was the mineral oil in the contaminated Ukrainian sunflower oils? M. Biedermann, K. Grob. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 111 (2009) 313–319
• Determination of mineral oil paraffins in foods by on-line HPLC–GC–FID: lowered detection limit; contamination of sunflower seeds and oils. K. Fiselier, K. Grob. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 229 (2009) 679–688
• Aromatic hydrocarbons of mineral oil origin in foods: method for determining the total concentration and first results. M. Biedermann and K. Grob. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57 (2009) 8711-8721
• Comprehensive two-dimensional GC after HPLC preseparation for the characterization of aromatic hydrocarbons of mineral oil origin in contaminated sunflower oil. M. Biedermann and K. Grob. J. Separation Science (in press)
• Is recycled newspaper suitable for food contact materials? Technical grade mineral oils from printing inks. M. Biedermann, K. Grob. Eur. Food Res. Technol. (submitted)