Upload
asher-warner
View
222
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Microrovers: Current and Past Examples and
Conclusions
Microrover Space Horizons WorkshopBrown University
Feb. 16, 2012
Bruce Betts, Ph.D.The Planetary Society
• What is a microrover? – No precise definition currently. – One example: 1 to roughly 10 kg;
MUSES-CN to Sojourner
• Lots of examples in design and Earth use, only Sojourner in flight
• We’ll look at microrovers:– Coolness– Catalog– Examples– Uses– Conclusions
Microrovers
Why are microrovers cool?
• Low cost, mass, volume imply:– Several can be piggybacked on missions– Increase capability, decrease risk for low cost– Power advantage: higher power to mass ratio
for smaller rovers– Can use in riskier ways if desired,– Mitigate risk by flying multiple– Easy to deploy
• Microrovers lead to new paradigms
Background: Cornell/TPS Microrovers Project
• The Planetary Society– Bruce Betts– Louis Friedman– Doug Stetson– Interns
• Cornell University– Jim Bell (later ASU)– Mason Peck– Joseph Shoer– Yervant Terzian– S/C Engineering class
• Stellar Exploration– Tomas Svitek and associates
• Independent– Tom Jones
• TM at JPL– Brian Wilcox
•Much of what is presented here came out of a Cornell/Planetary Society project (NASA Steckler Grant) to study Microrovers for use with astronauts.
•Though focus with astronauts, many products/conclusions remain useful for robotic only
Microrover Catalog• Created online microrover catalog
• What has been done for space and Earth on microrovers.
• Want to help new groups:– Not reinvent “the wheel”– Stimulate design thoughts
• One stop info on over 100 Terrestrial and Planetary Rovers (up to 100 kg for comparison)
• Tells us what we missed
Examples of current/recent microrovers
• Only “microrover” flown: Sojourner (11.5 kg) on Mars Pathfinder.
• MUSES-CN (1 kg) was also developed for flight by JPL
Example prototypes for space
JPL Sample Return Rover
Carleton U./CSA Kapvik (30 kg)Neptec/CSA Juno prototype
ESA Nanokhod (1.5 kg)
Earth uses examples (note design variety)
Inuktun VGTV (commercial inspection) 6 kg Hirose/Fukushima Titan IX
(defense/commercial) prototype mine removal
Recon robotics Recon scout 0.5 kg, defense
iRobot SUGV 11 kg defense
How can we use microrovers?
– Reconnaissance:• scout possible traverses (e.g., for large
rover, or for astronauts) • even more efficient if use multiple• several microrovers quickly explore area
compared to one large rover– Science: wide range possible from
imaging to contact science depending on payload.
– High risk exploration, • e.g., steep slopes, lava tubes
How can we use microrovers (2)
• Increasing Astronaut/Big Rover Safety– Enable focusing EVAs/Big
rover traverses on optimized tasks
– Facilities Inspection– Communications relays for
astronauts working “over the next hill”
How can we use microrovers (3)
• Increase Public Excitement/Involvement– Will be “fun” and engaging for the
public– Enable additional perspectives
imaging spacecraft, facilities, and astronauts (family portrait)
• Increase Student Involvement– Like CubeSat analogy, standardized
microrover conducive to university/student run projects
– Can have limited student/public teleoperation
Design Studies
• We did some basic design studies• One semester long Cornell engineering
design class on this topic (~50 students)• Provided input to follow-on professional
study (Stellar/TPS/Cornell), which distilled and added to student studies, and developed general and specific conclusions
Some General Conclusions
• Microrovers 1 - 11 kg offer unique benefits and risks, significantly different from larger rovers
• Paradigm shift: not a single rover that does it all, allows new concept of operations
• A group of microrovers may accomplish more, with fewer issues of reliability and lower cost than a single, large rover
• Low mass and easily stowed, microrovers adaptable to flexible, everyday use compared to larger
Specific Conclusions• Power/insulation solutions exist to allow a
microrover to survive the lunar night; • Mechanically matching an astronaut's speed
should not be a driving requirement for the rover's mobility subsystem. Instead: – Virtual proximity through network, and– Recon, science, inspection prior to or in place of
astronaut EVA
• Microrovers can provide GPS-like position knowledge
Specific Conclusions (2)
• Microrovers could have same core design, but portions including payload could reconfigured, ideally in a plug-and-play fashion.
• Working collaboratively as a network allows tasks to be shared among many nodes, including communications relay.
• Teleoperation, autonomous, or both. Ideally, both – at least limited autonomy.
Web and Email
• http://planetary.org/microrovers (Microrover catalog and additional
info/papers from TPS/Cornell study)
• Contact: [email protected] me know what is missing from catalog.