Upload
phamhanh
View
229
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
History and background - hybrid microcircuits
Shortly after the development of practical transistors in the mid-
1950s, the U.S. Army Signal Corps and RCA developed hybrid
microcircuits as dense assemblies of transistors and other
components.
Hybrid circuits comprise one or more transistor chips and passive
components like resistors and capacitors mounted on a ceramic
substrate and interconnected with wires and conductive traces.
Ref. Computer History Museum, The Silicon Engine
2
History and background - hybrid microcircuits
In 1965, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore predicted exponential
growth in the number of transistors incorporated on a single chip.
As "Moore's Law" became widely known, it became a self-
fulfilling prophecy that emerged as one of the driving principles
of the semiconductor industry.
Since Moore's prediction, IC transistor counts have doubled
every two years, allowing ever increasingly complex functions to
be integrated on a single chip.
Ref. Computer History Museum, The Silicon Engine
3
History and background - hybrid microcircuits
The complexity of functions implemented in hybrid circuits
has increased in parallel with the complexity of integrated
circuits.
Early hand crafted hybrid circuits were labor intensive and
expensive to produce.
Multichip modules (MCM) and packages (MCP) are modern
machine assembled hybrids used in high performance, high
volume applications like automotive controls, cell phones and
wireless networks.
4
Early hybrids used simple ceramic substrates with a single layer
of metal interconnection on the surface.
The simple hybrid substrate evolved into high temperature co-
fired ceramic (HTCC) substrates incorporating many layers of
circuitry, fused together at 1600°C.
With the addition of soldered or otherwise attached ring frame
and the metal lids, the HTCC substrates became complete
packages incorporating complex functions.
History and background - hybrid microcircuits
5
HTCC packages became a platform for many medical implants
History and background - hybrid microcircuits
6
Application background - Cochlear Implants
Hearing loss is one of the most common sensory impairments and affects 28 million Americans.
Approximately 1-3 out of 1,000 newborns has impaired hearing.
The elderly are more commonly affected with 40-50% of people over age 75 having hearing loss.
Depending on the degree of hearing loss, many affected individuals can be successfully fitted with hearing aids that amplify sound.
For patients with hearing loss that is not mitigated with hearing aids, a cochlear implant may provide an opportunity for hearing.
Ref. Medical Device Today, April 2010
7
Cochlear implants are surgically implanted devices for
individuals with severe to profound hearing loss who only receive
limited benefit from amplification with hearing aids.
A cochlear implant provides direct electrical stimulation to the
auditory nerve via electrodes, bypassing the usual transducer
cells that are absent or nonfunctional in deaf cochlea.
As of 2005, an estimated 85,000 patients worldwide have
received cochlear implants. However, this number represents
only a small number of the estimated 250,000 hearing-
impaired individuals who may benefit from a cochlear implant.
Application background - Cochlear Implants
8
Although individual responses to cochlear implants are highly
variable and depend on a number of physical and psychosocial
factors, the trend toward improved performance with
increasingly sophisticated electrodes and programming
strategies has dramatically expanded indications for cochlear
implantation.
Ref. Medical Device Today, April 2010
Application background - Cochlear Implants
9
Throughout the 1970s, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
recommended that devices be implanted only in adults with
profound hearing loss.
Over time, indications have been broadened to include adults
with severe hearing loss who may achieve some benefit from
conventional amplification (hearing aids).
In 1980, the FDA allowed children at least 2 years of age to be
implanted.
The age limit has recently been lowered to 12 months for all 3
devices available in the United States (Advanced Bionics, Med-
El, and Cochlear Corporation devices).
Application background - Cochlear Implants
10
Cochlear implants consist of both an externally worn component
and an internally implanted component.
The external component includes a microphone, an external
sound processor, and an external transmitter.
The internal component is surgically implanted and includes an
internal receiver placed within the temporal bone and an
electrode array that extends from the receiver into the cochlea
through a surgically created opening in the round window of the
middle ear.
Cochlear Implants
12
Sounds that are picked up by the microphone are carried to the
external sound processor, which transforms sound into coded
signals that are then transmitted transcutaneously to the
implanted internal receiver.
The receiver converts the incoming signals to electrical
impulses that are then conveyed to the electrode array,
ultimately stimulating the auditory nerve.
Cochlear Implants
13
Several cochlear implants are commercially available in the U.S.:
the Nucleus family of devices, manufactured by Cochlear
Corporation; the Clarion family of devices, manufactured by
Advanced Bionics and the Combi 40+ device, manufactured by
Med El Corporation.
Over the years, subsequent generations of the various
components of the devices have been approved by the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), focusing on improved
electrode design and speech-processing capabilities.
Cochlear Implants
14
Furthermore, smaller devices and the accumulating experience in
children have resulted in broadening of the selection criteria to
include children as young as 12 months.
The first cochlear implant electronics were produced on HTCC
substrates with hermetically sealed cavities. Enclosed in the
cavity were ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits) with
supporting active circuitry. Passive components were mounted
external to the cavity.
Cochlear Implants
15
The microelectronics circuit was assembled, electrically tested
and environmentally screened to the prescribed customer
specification.
The assembly and screening sequence was based on the MIL-
PRF-38534 specification that establishes the general
performance requirements for hybrid microcircuits, Multi-Chip
Modules (MCM) and similar devices, along with the verification
and validation requirements for ensuring that these devices
meet the applicable performance requirements.
Cochlear Implants
16
Placing the devices in children as young as 12 months old required lighter and smaller implants.
The second generation of the implant electronics was assembled on green organic board with ASICs configured into CSPs (chip scale packages).
The changes in the configuration and assembly techniques allowed for the additional weight and size reduction without compromising device reliability.
Cochlear Implants
17
Cochlear Implants
18
The CSPs were produced as sub-assemblies using known
good dice (KGD) and connectivity was validated via in-line X-
ray.
To add more functionality while further reducing size and weight
of the micro-circuit, the latest implant generation uses CSP
ASICs mounted on hard-flex substrates.
This assembly configuration presents unique challenges,
requiring specialty fixturing throughout the assembly process as
well as electrical testing and environmental screening. The end
result is a robust and reliable product suitable for long term
medical implant.
Cochlear Implants
19
Future challenges for medical implants
The market for neurostimulation products in the US was valued
at approximately $1.3 billion in 2009 and it has not yet
scratched the surface of its potential.
According to "US Markets for Neurostimulation Products," a
report published in March by the Medtech Insight division of
Elsevier Business Intelligence, this market is projected to grow
at a healthy compound annual rate of almost 16%, reaching
more than $2.7 billion five years from now.
Ref. BCC Research, Market Forecasting, May 2011
20
There are three main modalities of implantable
neurostimulation therapy — vagus nerve stimulation (VNS),
spinal cord stimulation (SCS), and deep brain stimulation
(DBS).
Future challenges for medical implants
21
Future challenges for medical implants
22
Each therapy modality poses a different challenge and requires a
different technology. The common factors among all of
neurostimulators will be ever smaller footprint, higher density and
tighter spacing of the components.
Medical Implants
Takeaways:
The common factor among all medical implants – small size, light
weight, high reliability
Continuous size reductions made possible through innovative
miniaturization techniques
Emerging neurostimulation VNS and DBS devices will require
further developments in materials and implant configurations
Maintaining High reliability, while reducing Size, Weight and Cost
of the implants are key focus for the future
23
Thank you
Faina Zaslavsky Director, Microelectronics Solutions
Business Unit
Crane Electronics, Inc.
Phone: (425) 895-5079
24