57
Deadweight Loss: Sources and Solutions David A. Anderson Centre College Chief Reader

MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Deadweight Loss: Sources and Solutions

David A. AndersonCentre CollegeChief Reader

Page 2: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011
Page 3: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011
Presenter
Presentation Notes
�Where to find this presentation.
Page 4: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Deadweight Loss

• What is it?

• How do we teach it?

• What do the AP questions on DWL look like?

Page 5: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Defining Deadweight Loss

“Losses associated with quantities of output that are greater than or less than the efficient level, as can result from market intervention such as taxes, or from externalities such as pollution.”

– Krugman’s Economics for AP, p. G-3

Page 6: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity0 10 20 30

Price

5

10

15

20

25

Consumer Surplus

Producer Surplus

In the Absence of Externalities

SUPPLY = MSC

DEMAND = MSB

Page 7: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity0 10 20 30

Price

5

10

15

20

25

Deadweight Loss of Underproduction

Deadweightloss

SUPPLY = MSC

DEMAND = MSB

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Parkin and McConnell/Brue/Flynn have similar graphs.
Page 8: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity of Soda0 10 20 30

PriceSUPPLY = MSC

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

DEMAND = MSB

Deadweight Loss Caused by a TaxSUPPLY with TAX

Per-unit Tax

Page 9: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity of Taxi Rides0 10 20 30

PriceSUPPLY = MSC

5

10

15

20

25

DEMAND = MSB

Deadweight Loss Caused by a Quota

QUOTA Amount

Page 10: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity of Milk0 10 20 30

PriceSUPPLY = MSC

DEMAND = MSB

Deadweight Loss Caused by a Price Floor

Price FLOOR

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

Page 11: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity of Apartments0 10 20 30

PriceSUPPLY = MSC

DEMAND = MSB

Deadweight Loss Caused by a Price Ceiling

Price CEILING

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Page 12: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity of Vaccinations0 10 20 30

PriceSUPPLY = MSC

5

10

15

20

25

Marginal Social Benefit

Deadweight Loss Caused by a Positive Externality

DEMAND

Marginal External Benefit

Page 13: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity

Price

5

10

15

20

25

Deadweight Loss of Overproduction

Deadweightloss

0 10 20 30

SUPPLY = MSC

DEMAND = MSB

Page 14: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity

Price

5

10

15

20

25

The “Arrow” Points to the Socially Optimal Quantity

0 10 20 30

SUPPLY = MSC

DEMAND = MSB

Page 15: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity0 10 20 30

Price

5

10

15

20

25

Deadweight Loss of Underproduction

SUPPLY = MSC

DEMAND = MSB

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Parkin and McConnell/Brue/Flynn have similar graphs.
Page 16: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Fruit Cakes

Price

5

10

15

20

25

The Deadweight Loss of ChristmasJoel Waldfogel, American Economic Review, 1993,

vol. 83, issue 5, pp. 1328-36.

0 10 20 30

SUPPLY = MSC

DEMAND = MSB

Page 17: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity of Gasoline

PriceSocial Marginal Cost

1

2

3

4

5

DEMAND

Deadweight Loss of Overproduction Due to an Externality

0 10 20 30

SUPPLY

Marginal External Cost

Page 18: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity of Cola

$/unit

0 1 2 3

Page 19: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity of Cola

$/unit

Demand(additional benefit per unit)

0 1 2 3

Page 20: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity of Cola

$/unit

Supply(additional cost per unit)

0 1 2 3

Page 21: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity of Cola

$/unit

Demand

Supply

0 1 2* 3

Page 22: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity of Cola

$/unit

Supply

True Additional Cost per Unit = Marginal Social Cost

Demand

0 1* 2 3

Page 23: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity of Cola

$/unit

Supply

Marginal Social Cost

Demand

0 1* 2 3

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Pollution makes the 2nd unit cost more than it’s worth.
Page 24: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Quantity of Cola

$/unit

Supply

Marginal Social Cost

Demand

0 1* 2 3

Deadweightloss

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Pollution makes the 2nd unit cost more than it’s worth.
Page 25: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Teaching Net Gains

Page 26: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Utility Gains from a Sack Lunch

• Time required: 10-15 minutes

• Materials: Each person needs one or more random knick-knack worth about 25 cents (lunch sack optional).

Page 27: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

How Happy Are You?

• With what you brought?

Page 28: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

How Happy Are You?

• With what you brought?

• After Trading with Neighbors

Page 29: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

How Happy Are You?

• With what you brought?

• After Trading with Neighbors

• After Trading with Anyone

Page 30: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

The Gains from Trade

• The net gains enjoyed when trade can occur,

• And the increases in those net gains when more trade can occur,

• Are the types of gains foregone asDEADWEIGHT LOSS when the amount of trade is reduced by quotas, taxes, price ceilings, and price floors.

Page 31: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Teaching Externalities

THE ECOMEDY CLUB

• Time required: 15-20 minutes

• Materials required: – 2 random books, identical or not– 10 knock-knock jokes

Page 32: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

This experiment involves:

2 independent producers of human capital (memorizers) and

2 joint consumers of humor (comedians).

The comedians sit on opposite sides of the room, with the memorizers seated roughly in the middle.

How to Play

Page 33: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

The memorizers’ goal is to memorize as many consecutive words in a randomly selected sentence as they can in 30 seconds.

• First with silence

• Then with comedy

How to Play

Page 34: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Knock Knock!Who’s there?Amos.Amos who?Amosquito just bit me!Knock Knock!Who’s there?Andy.Andy who?Andy bit me again!Knock Knock!Who’s there?House.House who?House it going?Knock Knock!Who’s there?Olive.Olive who?Olive You!Knock Knock!Who’s there?Sarah.Sarah who?Sarah doctor in the house?

Knock Knock!Who’s there?Boo.Boo who?Stop crying, it’s just a joke!Knock Knock!Who’s there?Goat.Goat who?Goat to the door and find out!Knock Knock!Who’s there?Leaf.Leaf who?Leaf me alone!Knock Knock!Who’s there?Justin.Justin who?Justin time for supper!Knock Knock!Who’s there?Les.Les who?Les go for a swim!

Page 35: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

You will find that there are negative externalities from comedy!

Page 36: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Source

• David Anderson and James Chasey, Favorite Ways to Learn Economics 3e, Worth Publishers, 2011.

Page 37: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011
Page 38: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011
Page 39: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

SCORING GUIDELINES

(d) 1 point:

• One point is earned for concluding that, owing to the tax, the market is no longer allocatively efficient AND that total surplus decreases or the tax creates a deadweight loss.

Page 40: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

2011 AP Questions

Page 41: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

10. Overseas Micro 2 (a)(iii)

Question: Suppose research shows that the more college education individuals receive, the more responsible citizens they become and the less likely they are to commit crimes.

(a) Draw a correctly labeled graph for the education market and show …

(iii) Deadweight loss at the market equilibrium, completely shaded.

Page 42: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

PRIC

E

Supply = Marginal Social Cost

Quantity of Educations

Demand = Marg. Private Ben.

Marginal Social Benefit

0

PM

QM QS

Deadweight loss from underproduction

Page 43: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

5. Overseas Micro 2 part (b)

Question: Assume that the government imposes an effective (binding) price ceiling on the price of college education.

(ii) Does this price ceiling increase, decrease, or have no impact on the deadweight loss in this industry? Explain.

Page 44: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

PRIC

E

Supply = Marginal Social Cost

Quantity of Educations

Demand = Marg. Private Ben.

Marginal Social Benefit

0

PM

QM QS

Page 45: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

PRIC

E

Supply = Marginal Social Cost

Quantity of Educations

Demand = Marg. Private Ben.

Marginal Social Benefit

0

PCeiling

P1

PM

QM QSQC

Page 46: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Answer: Deadweight loss will increase because the quantity supplied will decrease.

5. Overseas Micro 2 part (b)

Page 47: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

1. Micro 3 (a)

Question: Draw a correctly labeled graph of the market for good X [known to create a negative externality] and show …

(iv) The area of deadweight loss, shaded completely

Page 48: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

PRIC

E

Marginal Private Cost

QUANTITY

Demand = MSB

QM

Marginal Social Cost

QS

Deadweight loss from over

production

Market Quantity

Answer:

4.1% answered correctly

Page 49: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

2010 AP Question

Page 50: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

The Graph Provided

PRIC

E

Supply = MPC

QUANTITY

Demand = MSB

q3q2

P1

P2

J

P4

P3

P5

q1 q4 q5

TSR

K

L

M

N

U

Page 51: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

1. Micro 3 (c)

Question: Assume that the government imposes a per-unit tax of (p5-p2) to correct for the negative externality. [They were told in part (b) that the negative externality was equal to (p5-p2).] … Identify the area representing the deadweight loss.

Page 52: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

The Graph Provided

PRIC

E

Supply = MPC

QUANTITY

Demand = MSB

q3q2

P1

P2

J

P4

P3

P5

q1 q4 q5

TSR

K

L

M

N

U

Page 53: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Deadweight Loss with Negative Externalities

“Quantity levels less than or greater than the efficient quantity create efficiency losses (or deadweight losses).”

“Our analysis of the efficiency loss of a tax assumes no negative externalities …. Where such spillover costs occur, the excise tax on the producers might actually improve allocative efficiency by reducing output and thus lessening the negative externality.”

--McConnell, Brue, Flynn, 18e, p. 129 & 368

Page 54: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

PRIC

E

Supply = MPC

QUANTITY

Demand = MSB

q3

MSC = MPC + Marg. External Cost

q2

P1

P2

J

P4

P3

P5

q1 q4 q5

TSR

K

L

M

N

U

Efficient Quantity

Page 55: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

PRIC

E

Supply = MPC

QUANTITY

Demand = MSB

q3

MSC = MPC + Marg. External Cost

q2

P1

P2

J

P4

P3

P5

q1 q4 q5

Deadweight loss from over

production

Market Quantity

Page 56: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

PRIC

E

Supply = MPC

QUANTITY

Demand = MSB

q3

MSC = MPC + Marg. External Cost

q2

P1

P2

J

P4

P3

P5

q1 q4 q5

TSR

K

L

M

N

U

Efficient Quantity

No deadweight loss at efficient quantity.

Page 57: MicroEcon Deadweight Loss 2011

Answer: With the tax, the deadweight loss is zero (0.5 percent answered correctly).

1. Micro 3 part (c) cont.