10
©Michael Borrus, 2003 Electronics Value Chain Electronics Value Chain Source: IC Insights

©Michael Borrus, 2003 Electronics Value Chain Source: IC Insights

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ©Michael Borrus, 2003 Electronics Value Chain Source: IC Insights

©Michael Borrus, 2003

Electronics Value ChainElectronics Value Chain

Source: IC Insights

Page 2: ©Michael Borrus, 2003 Electronics Value Chain Source: IC Insights

©Michael Borrus, 2003

Chips = Miniature CitiesChips = Miniature Cities

Low-angle scanning electron micrograph of a portion of a partially completed SRAM array containing six-device memory cells. The insulating oxide films have been removed, revealing the lower levels of the interconnection structure of the array.                                                     

Source: Intel and IBM

Page 3: ©Michael Borrus, 2003 Electronics Value Chain Source: IC Insights

©Michael Borrus, 2003

Technical Progress ITechnical Progress I

Source: Gordon Moore presentation, SIA 2002

Page 4: ©Michael Borrus, 2003 Electronics Value Chain Source: IC Insights

©Michael Borrus, 2003

Technical Progress IITechnical Progress II

Source: Gordon Moore presentation, SIA 2002

Page 5: ©Michael Borrus, 2003 Electronics Value Chain Source: IC Insights

©Michael Borrus, 2003

Worldwide Semiconductor Worldwide Semiconductor SalesSales

1975-20051975-2005

0

50

100

150

200

250

$Billions

WW CAGR = 13.3%

Source: SIA, WSTS* Forecast

Page 6: ©Michael Borrus, 2003 Electronics Value Chain Source: IC Insights

©Michael Borrus, 2003

Top 10 Suppliers Selected YearsTop 10 Suppliers Selected Years1978 1986 1993

1 TI NEC Intel

2 Motorola Hitachi NEC

3 NEC Toshiba Motorola

4 Philips Motorola Toshiba

5 National TI Hitachi

6 Fairchild Philips TI

7 Hitachi Fujitsu Fujitsu

8 Toshiba Matsushita Samsung

9 Intel Mitsubishi Mitsubishi

10 Siemens Intel MatsushitaSource: Electronic News, various years

Page 7: ©Michael Borrus, 2003 Electronics Value Chain Source: IC Insights

©Michael Borrus, 2003

Evolution of Chip Competition IEvolution of Chip Competition I1960s-late 1970s1960s-late 1970s

Policy: Military/Space R&D, Procurement; Antitrust, Tax

Launch Market: Military, then Computing

Demand: High Performance at any Cost

Structure: Vertically Fragmented, Start-up Merchants

Development Trajectory: Product Innovation

Policy: Credit allocation, technology controls, trade and investment protection

Launch Market: Consumer Electronics

Demand: High Reliability at lowest Cost

Structure: Vertically Integrated; Keiretsu

Development Trajectory: Manufacturing Innovation

U.S. Japan

Result: US seizes global market leadership

Page 8: ©Michael Borrus, 2003 Electronics Value Chain Source: IC Insights

©Michael Borrus, 2003

Evolution of Chip Competition IIEvolution of Chip Competition IILate 1970s - late 1980sLate 1970s - late 1980s

Lead Market: Emergence of PCs/desktop systems Demand: Performance AND Reliability at Lowest

Cost Structure: Merchants vs. Vert. Integr/Keiretsu Strategic Advantage: Capital spending to add

capacity with manufacturing innovation to deliver quality at low cost (i.e., lean production)

Policy: VLSI Project in Japan; US Trade Policy culminating in US-Japan STA

Result: Japanese firms become global leaders, dominating memory; US firms retain key position in logic

Page 9: ©Michael Borrus, 2003 Electronics Value Chain Source: IC Insights

©Michael Borrus, 2003

Sales, Market Shares, Capital SpendSales, Market Shares, Capital Spend1982-19901982-1990

Market Shares

Sources: SIA; Leachman and Leachman in Macher, Mowery, Simcoe

Capacity Shares

Page 10: ©Michael Borrus, 2003 Electronics Value Chain Source: IC Insights

©Michael Borrus, 2003

Strategic Market GameStrategic Market Game

Fragmented Open

Potential Competitive Dependence

Industry Coordination Difficult

Assets Accessible

Integrated Closed

Potential to Marginalize Competitors

Strategic Coordination Scale/Price Discrimination Inaccessible Assets

US Japan

Consequences: