Upload
laureen-jasmin-nicholson
View
229
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MGMT 371:MGMT 371:Individual Differences: Self-Individual Differences: Self-Concept and Personality and Concept and Personality and Social PerceptionsSocial Perceptions
Self-concepts Self-Management Personality Social Perceptions
An OB Model for Studying Individual Differences
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Personalitytraits
Self Concept• Self-esteem• Self-efficacy
• Self-monitoring
The Unique Individual Forms of Self- Expression
Attitudes
Abilities
Emotions
Self-Management
Propositions of Interactional Psychology
Behavior is a function of continuous, multidirectional interaction between the person and the situation.
The person is active in this process and both changes situation and is changed by them.
People vary in many characteristics, including cognitive, affective, motivational and ability factors.
Two aspects of a situation are important: the objective situation and the person’s subjective view of the situation.
Self-Efficacy Beliefs Pave the Way for Success or Failure
McGraw-Hill
Priorexperience
Behaviormodels
PersuasionFrom
Others
AssessmentOf PhysicalEmotional
State
Sources of Self-Efficacy Beliefs
Feedback Results
High
“I know I can do this job
Self-efficacy
Beliefs
Low
“I don’t think I can get the job
done.”
BehaviorPatterns
BehaviorPatterns
Success
Failure
Self-Monitoring
Behavior and cues
High self monitors flexible: adjust
behavior according to the situation and the behavior of others
can appear unpredictable and inconsistent
Low self monitors act from internal
states rather than from situational cues
show consistency less likely to respond
to work group norms or supervisory feedback
The Role of Affect
Positive Affect – an individual’s tendency to accentuate the positive aspects of oneself, other people, and the world in general
Negative Affect – an individual’s tendency to accentuate the negative aspects of oneself, other people, and the world in general
Self-Management
Social Learning Model Situational cues Cognitive supports Self-talk Self-reinforcement
A Social Learning Model of Self-Management
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Person
(Psychological self)
Situational cues Consequences
Behavior
Locus of Control
Internal External
I control what happens to me!
People and circumstances control my fate!
Personality
The relatively stable set of
characteristics that influences an
individual’s behavior and lend it
consistency.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Personality Theories
Trait Theory – understand individuals by breaking down behavior patterns into observable traits
Psychodynamic Theory – emphasizes the unconscious determinants of behavior
Humanistic Theory – emphasizes individual growth and improvement
Integrative Approach – describes personality as a composite of an individual’s psychological processes
Personality Characteristics in Organizations
A strong situation can
overwhelm the effectsof individual personalitiesby providing strong cuesfor appropriate behavior
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
In the 1940’s, Myers and Briggs
developed the MBTI to understand
individual differences by analyzing
the combinations of preferences.
Cognitive Abilities
Intelligence: Capacity for constructive thinking, reasoning, problem solving
Seven Major Mental Abilities General and specific
Seven Major Mental Abilities
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Able to perceive spatial patterns and to visualize how geometric shapes would look if transformed in shape and position
Spatial
Ability to make quick and accurate arithmetic computations such as adding and subtracting
Numerical
Ability to produce isolated words that fulfill symbolic or structural requirements
Word fluency
Understanding what words mean and readily comprehending what is read
Verbal comprehension
DescriptionAbility
Seven Major Mental Abilities (Cont.)
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ability to reason from specifics to general conclusions
Inductive reasoning
Ability to perceive figures, identify similarities and differences, and carry out tasks involving visual perception
Perceptual speed
DescriptionAbility
Having good memory for paired words, symbols, lists of numbers, or other associated items
Memory
Stage 1: Selective Attention/Comprehension- Attention is the process of becoming aware of something or someone- People pay attention to salient stimuli
Stage 2: Encoding and Simplification- Encoding = interpreting environmental stimuli by using info in cognitive schemata-Each individual encodes uniquely
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Social Information Processing ModelOf Perception
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
STEREOTYPES
Traditional Stereotypes: Sex roles, Age, Race, Disability, etc. Managerial Implications
Why do we stereotype?
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
Stage 3: Storage and Retention- Encoded info stimuli is sent to long-term memory- Long-term memory: three compartments of info about events, semantic materials, and
people
Stage 4: Retrieval and Response- Information is retrieved from memory to make judgments and decisions
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Social Information Processing Model of Perception (Cont.)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Commonly Found Perceptual Errors
The tendency to avoid all extreme judgments and rate people and objects as average or neutral.
Central Tendency
A personal characteristic that leads an individual to consistently evaluate other people or objects in an extremely positive fashion.
Leniency
A rater forms an overall impression about an object and then uses the impression to bias ratings about the object.
Halo
DescriptionPerceptual Error
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Commonly Found Perceptual Errors (Cont.)
The tendency to evaluate people or objects by comparing them with characteristics of recently observed people or objects.
Contrast Effects
The tendency to remember recent information. If the recent information is negative, the person or object is evaluated negatively.
Recency Effects
DescriptionPerceptual Error
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Positive and Negative Emotions
Negative emotions (Goal incongruent):- Anger - Fright/anxiety- Guilt/shame - Sadness- Envy/jealousy - Disgust
Positive emotions (Goal congruent)- Happiness/joy - Pride- Love/affection - Relief
PERCEPTION IS REALITY!
Info Processing Model1. Selective Attention/Comprehension2. Encoding & Simplification3. Storage & Retention4. Retrieval & Response
Social Perception Model
Social Perception
Target Characteristics• Physical appearance• Verbal communication• Nonverbal cues• Intentions
Perceiver Characteristics• Familiarity with target• Attitudes/Mood • Self-concept• Cognitive structure
Situational Characteristics• Interaction context• Strength of situational cues
Barriers • Selective perception• Stereotyping• First-impression error• Projection• Self-fulfilling prophecies
Barriers to Social Perception
Impression Management
Stereotype
First Impression Error
Projection
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Impression Management
The process by which individuals try to control the impression others have of them Name dropping Appearance Self-description Flattery Favors Agreement with opinion
ATTRIBUTIONS: Inferring Cause and Effect1. Kelly’s Model
3 dimensions of behavior assessed1. Consensus2. Distinctiveness3. Consistency
Internal Attributions External Attributions
Consensus
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
People
Ind
ivid
ual P
erf
orm
anc
e
A B C D EPeople
Ind
ivid
ual P
erf
orm
anc
eA B C D E
Low High
Source: KA Brown, “Explaining Group Poor Performance: an Attributional Analysis,” Academy of Management Review, January 1984, p 56. Used with permission.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Distinctiveness
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Source: KA Brown, “Explaining Group Poor Performance: an Attributional Analysis,” Academy of Management Review, January 1984, p 56. Used with permission.
Tasks
Ind
ivid
ual P
erf
orm
anc
e
A B C D ETasks
Ind
ivid
ual P
erf
orm
anc
e
A B C D E
Low High
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Consistency
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Source: KA Brown, “Explaining Group Poor Performance: an Attributional Analysis,” Academy of Management Review, January 1984, p 56. Used with permission.
Time
Ind
ivid
ual P
erf
orm
anc
e
Time
Ind
ivid
ual P
erf
orm
anc
e
Low High
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
ATTRIBUTIONS: Inferring Cause and Effect2. Weiner’s Model (Process)
Individual performs a task He/she judges it successful or non Causal analysis (Internal vs. External) Influence on self-esteem, future
performance