Upload
vukiet
View
219
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© Wärtsilä
METHANOL – THE FUTURE MARINE FUEL!
Toni Stojcevski
10/6/2016 Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä
REGULATION DRIVERS - IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT
3
LOCAL
GLOBAL
LOCAL
LOCAL
Acid rains
Tier II (2011)
Tier III (2016) NOx
Greenhouse effect
Under evaluation by IMO
EEDI / SEEMP CO2
Acid rains
Sulphur content in fuel
SECA (2015) – Global 2020/2025 SOx
Direct impact on humans
Locally regulated
Particulate matter
Particulates <10μ
3,7 mil / year premature deaths worldwide[1]
Sources: [1] WHO, 2014, Fact sheet No 313; 2 NOAA; 3IIASA ; 4 IPCC
NOx
$562 bil / year
Global health related costs [3]
SOx
Responsible for 50%
of particulates in the air [2]
CO2
$1tr - $3tr “Coping cost”
(1-5% of GDP in 2014) [4]
© Wärtsilä 4
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION CONTINUES
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2025
SOx legislation: • Sulphur free fuels
– LNG
– Methanol, LPG, bio-fuels
– Distillates
• Scrubbers in combination with HFO
NOx legislation: Tier II
• Engine internal methods
Tier III
• Secondary methods (SCR)
• LNG/NG with lean burning process (dual-fuel
engines)
Ballast Water Treaty: • UV ballast water treatment system
• EC ballast water treatment system
• Minimised amount of ballast water through
Ship Design
Global cap 0.5% SOx
Global Ballast Water Management Treaty
NOx Tier III in NECA (North America)
NOx Tier II (Global)
Global 0.5% SOx limit reviewed
All ECA 0.1% SOx
North Europe ECA 1% SOx
0.1% SOx in EU ports
Global cap 3.5% SOx
US Ballast Water Management Treaty
North America ECA 1% SOx
© Wärtsilä 10/6/2016
WHERE TO GO?
Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä PUBLIC
In Service
First installation in
service since Q1
2015
Promising pilot
results
Full engines test
on ZA40 have
taken place during
2014
Methanol • Sulfur free
• Low Nox
• Ultra low
particulates
Bio-fuels
• Sulpfur free
• Fuel specification
and availability is a
question mark
VOC
• Mix of different HC´s
and inert gas
• VOC from a shuttle
tanker can cover
20% of energy
demand
LPG
• Sulfur free
• Heavier than air
• 2% of global
energy market
In Service
In service since
2012
Operating on Bio-
Fuel or MDO
Several land based
power plants in
operation
Tested in the
90`s
Challenge with
injection pressure
with the diesel
principle
Smoke problem
Plant was
transferred back to
liquid fuel
In Service
Several VOC
recovery
installations in use
GasReformer
delivered 2013
DF engines in
marine service
since 2001
SECA
NECA
Ethane
• C2H6
• Sulfur free
• Interesting when
available as cargo
In Service
DF engines
running on ethane
in service since
2015
Approval in
principle
SECA
NECA
SECA
NECA
SECA NECA (Otto Principle)
SECA NECA (Otto Principle)
ALTERNATIVE CLEAN FUELS (BESIDES LNG)
10/6/2016 Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä
FUEL PROPERTIES
7
Units Methanol LNG Bunker Fuel
Molecular formula CH3OH >90% CH4 CnH1.8n C8-C20
Carbon Content (wt%) 37.49 ~75 ~87
Density kg/l 0.79 0.44 (LNG) 0.85
Water Solubility Complete No No
Boiling point °C 65 -162 150-370
Flash point °C 11 -188 min.60
Auto ignition °C 464 540 240
Viscosity cSt@20°C ~0.6 n.a. ~13.5
Octane RON/MON 109/89 120/120 -
Cetane No. - 5 - 45-55
LHV MJ/kg 20 45 42
Flammability limits Vol% 7-36 5-15 1-6
Flame speed cm/s 52 37 37
Heat of evaporation kJ/kg 1178 n.a. 233
Stoichiometric AF ratio - 6.45 17.2 14.7
Adiabatic flame temp. °C 1910 1950 2100
Bulk modulus MPa 777 848 1350
Sulphur content % 0 0 3.5 max
© Wärtsilä
Nitrogen
Generator
Oil unit
Diesel pump
Water tank for dilution of
fuel return
Methanol tank and
LP feed system
EHSV
SSV
SSV: Shutdown and Safety Valve
EHSV: Electro-Hydraulic Solenoid Valve
* All methanol lines can be flushed with nitrogen.
Nitrogen purge*
Sealing oil
Control oil
Methanol
Methanol pump
TECHNOLOGY – MD SYSTEM LAYOUT
• Pilot-fuel assisted diesel combustion concept
• Methanol is combusted according to the diesel process. Methanol is injected close to TDC
and ignited by a small amount of diesel pilot fuel.
© Wärtsilä
WÄRTSILÄ METHANOL - DIESEL ON ENGINE PIPING
10/6/2016 Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä
METHANOL INJECTOR - THE HEART OF THE METHANOL ADAPTATION
6 October 2016
[Presentation name /
Author]
10
ACCUMULATOR
BLOCK CONTROL
BLOCK TRANSFER
BLOCK
The methanol injector allows the engine to run on
methanol ignited by pilot fuel or on pure diesel.
© Wärtsilä
CONTROL OIL
FROM SOLENOID VALVE
METHANOL
FROM METHANOL HP PUMP
PILOT DIESEL
FROM DIESEL JERK PUMP
FLOW FUSE
ACCUMULATOR
SEALING OIL
AT METHANOL SEALING SURFACES
+ AROUND METHANOL NEEDLES
SEALING
OIL
CONTROL
PISTON
TRIANGULAR
PLATE
DIESEL
NOZZLE
METHANOL INJECTOR WORKING PRINCIPLE
© Wärtsilä
Source: SAE 2016-01-0887 , Svensson et al. , Lund University
PHI T MAPS – NOX & PPM
Zero particulates , much lower NOx
Typical Diesel Fuel Methanol Fuel
“soot”
“soot” NOx
NOx
Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä 10/6/2016
© Wärtsilä
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00
Filt
er S
mo
ke N
um
be
r M
ea
s 1
[F
SN
]
BMEP [bar]
ZA40_reference
Z40_reference 2003_HFO_CS
Z40_reference 2014_LFO_CS
Z40_load swing_450bar pinj
Z40_load swing_600bar pinj
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00
NO
x M
ari
ne
Sp
ecif
ic IS
O 8
17
8 C
orr
[g
/kW
h]
BMEP [bar]
ZA40S_reference
Z40_reference 2014_LFO_CS
Z40_reference 2003_HFO_CS
Z40_load swing_450bar pinj
Z40_load swing_600bar pinj
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
t5 T
em
p b
Tu
rbin
e [°
C]
BMEP [bar]
ZA40S_reference
Z40_reference 2003_HFO_CS_norm
Z40_reference 2014_LFO_CS_norm
Z40_load swing_450bar pinj_norm
Z40_load swing_600bar pinj_norm
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
t6 T
em
p E
xh P
ipe
[°C
]
BMEP [bar]
ZA40S_reference
Z40_reference 2003_HFO_CS_norm
Z40_reference 2014_LFO_CS_norm
Z40_load swing_450bar pinj_norm
Z40_load swing_600bar pinj_norm
160165170175180185190195200205210215220225230235240245
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00
Tota
l BS
FC
LH
V C
orr
ect
ed
[g
/kW
h]
Engine Power % [%]
Z40_reference
Z40_reference 2014_LFO_CS
Z40_load swing_450bar pinj
Z40_load swing_600bar pinj
Z40_reference_HFO_2003
~2%
* Preliminary tests - Engine consumption
- Further investigation on engine efficiency to be performed
- (Heat Balance and heat release to be calculated)
*
No reduction in output and load response unchanged
Full fuel redundancy
INITIAL TEST RESULTS OF WÄRTSILÄ SULZER ZA40S-MD
10/6/2016 Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä
Cost
Capex: Not a “complex” conversion; feasible ROI
Opex: Methanol fuel prices competitive? to (MGO/MDO,LSFO)
Availability
Fuel: Liquid, widely used in chemical industry,
Can utilize existing transport and terminal infrastructure
Technology: Available for ZA40S engines today, Pilot Installation Q1 2015,
Concept for other engines available, pilot projects research
METHANOL OVERVIEW: AVAILABILITY & COST
10/6/2016 Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä 6.10.2016 15
FUEL PRICES
0,00
5,00
10,00
15,00
20,00
25,00
30,00
Ju
n
Sep
De
c
Ma
r
Ju
n
Sep
De
c
Ma
r
Ju
n
Sep
De
c
Ma
r
Ju
n
Sep
De
c
Ma
r
Ju
n
Sep
De
c
Ma
r
Ju
n
Sep
De
c
Ma
r
Ju
n
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
US
D /
MM
BT
U
Nat Gas (Spot) TTF (NL) USD / MMBTU Nat Gas (Spot) Henry Hub USD / MMBTU
LNG Japan USD / MMBTU HFO 380 Centistoke Rotterdam USD / MMBTU
HFO 180 Centistoke Rotterdam USD / MMBTU Marine Gas Oil Rotterdam USD / MMBTU
MDO Rotterdam USD / MMBTU LSFO 1 % Fair Value NWE USD / MMBTU
Methanol Rotterdam USD / MMBTU
© Wärtsilä
FUTURE OF NATURAL GAS
2012: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study - findings
“The potential for natural gas to reduce oil dependence could be increased by conversion
into room temperature liquid fuels that can be stored at atmospheric pressure.
Of these fuels, methanol is the only one that has been produced for a long period at large
industrial scale.
Methanol has the lowest cost and lowest GHG emissions, but requires some infrastructure
modification and faces substantial acceptance challenges.”
2015: Gal Luft – IAGS
”Methanol provides natural gas an entry point to markets where it is currently underutilized
... Despite its price and environmental advantages over diesel fuels, natural gas powers
today small fraction of the world’s shipping … By any yardstick, methanol is the most
attractive carrier for natural gas.”
10/6/2016 Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä
Natural Gas (CH4)
LNG MeOH
New costly
infrastructure
η=90% η=~70%
Existing
infrastructure
Renewable methanol possible
AVAILIBILITY - MEOH & LNG, TWO OPTIONS TO TRANSPORT NG
10/6/2016 Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä
70 terminals
world-wide
© Wärtsilä
Ballast tank converted
to methanol fuel tank
Pump room
Double walled
fuel pipes
Engines converted for
methanol combustion
STENA GERMANICA – CONVERSION SCOPE
Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä 10/6/2016
© Wärtsilä
Engine conversion to dual fuel
New electrical installation
High pressure pipes
New engine control system for
all four engines
High pressure pumps Methanol storage tank
painted with zinc silicate
METHANOL ADAPTATION
10/6/2016 Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä
ENGINE BEFORE AND AFTER CONVERSION
10/6/2016 Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä
• Adaptation of proven engine technology, minor modification to the engine • No reduction in efficiency or output running on methanol • Load response unchanged, full fuel redundancy • Existing fuel or ballast tanks can be converted to methanol tanks • Short off-hire time, can be done engine by engine • Lower thermic load on the engine • Much lower NOx, SOx, and PM (particulates), good base for future ECA regulations • Available methanol infrastructure (bunker fuel to be developed)
ENGINE CONVERSION KIT – FEATURES
10/6/2016 Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä 10/6/2016
© Wärtsilä PUBLIC © Wärtsilä
CHALLENGES & FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS
22
Technical
• material choice important
‒ special alloys, coatings and sealing materials
• design criteria important
‒ special design for sealing surfaces
Economical
• price disconnection from bunker fuel market
• availability, >60 export/import terminals, how to bunker?
Rekommendations:
‒ Variable injection timing for both pilot and main fuels
‒ Separate pilot fuel injector -> minimizing the pilot fuel amount
‒ Water-blended methanol -> lower NOx
‒ Pure methanol mode – diesel combustion cycle – hot surface assisted ignition
© Wärtsilä 10/6/2016
SCENARIOS FOR RENEWABLE FUELS
Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä 10/6/2016
Case study 3: Pilot methanol vs. Reference ship Monetized annual benefits – central estimate (low & high)
Pilot methanol vs.
Reference ship
Human Health 563 (261-1316) KEUR
Crop damages 0 KEUR
TOTAL 563 (261-1316) KEUR
EMISSIONS & SOCIOECONOMIC BENEFITS – CASE STUDY
Pilot
Methanol Reference
ship
SO2 2 29 ton NOx 56 56 ton
PM2.5 4 32 ton Fuel use 632 632 TJ
SECA compatible? yes yes
NECA compatible? yes yes
Emissions Monetized benefits
SO2 28 ton NOx 0 ton PM2.5 28 ton
Emission reduction
High socioeconomic benefits
Source: ZVT, IVL, Erik
Fridell, Stefan Åström, 2015
“As air quality improves in response to legislation, its public health impact will fall by 2020 across Europe. As
a result, public health costs of air pollution are expected to fall from €803 billion a year in 2000 to €537 billion
in 2020. The number of people dying prematurely from the effects of air pollution is calculated to fall from
around 680,000 people in 2000, to around 450,000 in 2020.” Source: EC – Science for Environmental Policy
Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä
The same infrastructure for
Shipping and Land transport
Methanol bunkering NG-Methanol +
Production of DME for trucks
Waste to methanol
Enerkem
NG-Methanol
CO2-Electrofuel
CRI
Volvo DME trucks
Wärtsilä Methanol Engines
Methanol fuel blending
M-15, M-85 or M-100 NG-Methanol is ultimate transition fuel to
Fossil free fuel society
Leaders of the industry should conduct their business in a way that
doesn't always benefit them only but benefits the society in whole
METHANOL - THE BRIDGE TO A FOSSIL FREE FUEL SOCIETY
10/6/2016 Toni Stojcevski / Wärtsilä