Upload
shonda-atkinson
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Mesh-Current Analysis
General circuit analysis method
Based on KVL and Ohm’s Law
Advantages: ALWAYS worksSimple to set up
Disadvantages: Leads to systems of equationsCan be tedious to solveCould be an easier method
Matrix methods (Cramer’s Rule) and computers can be very useful!
1
Mesh-Current AnalysisExample
20
5
10
25
15
35
30
Assume mesh currents
Direction of currents is arbitrary
Write KVL equations Vs = (I R)
2
Mesh 1: 0 = 20 i1 + 5 i1 + 35 (i1 – i3) + 10 (i1 – i2)
Mesh 2: 5 = 10 (i2 – i1) + 15 (i2 – i3) + 25 i2
Mesh 3: 0 = 15 (i3 – i2) + 35 (i3 – i1) + 30 i3
70 i1 – 10 i2 – 35 i3 = 0
– 10 i1 + 50 i2 – 15 i3 = 5
– 35 i1 – 15 i2 + 80 i3 = 0
Mesh-Current AnalysisExample
20
5
10
25
15
35
30
3
70 i1 – 10 i2 – 35 i3 = 0
– 10 i1 + 50 i2 – 15 i3 = 5
– 35 i1 – 15 i2 + 80 i3 = 0
Cramer’s Rule:
500184801535155010351070
,D
6256801501550535100
,A
87521800351551035070
,B
0007015355501001070
,C
mA.,
,
D
Ai 935
5001846256
1
mA.,
,
D
Bi 6118
50018487521
2
mA.,
,
D
Ci 937
5001840007
3
Mesh-Current AnalysisExample
20
5
10
25
15
35
30
4
mA.,
,
D
Ai 935
5001846256
1
mA.,
,
D
Bi 6118
50018487521
2
mA.,
,
D
Ci 937
5001840007
3 V1
V2V3
V4
V5Vref
Vref = 0
V1 = 5 V
V2 = V1 – 20 i1 = 5 – 20 (0.0359) = 4.282 V
V3 = V2 – 5 i1 = 4.282 – 5 (0.0359) = 4.103 V
V4 = V3 – 35 (i1 – i3) = 4.103 – 35 (0.0359 – 0.0379) = 4.173 V
V5 = V4 – 15 (i2 – i3) = 4.173 – 15 (0.1186 – 0.0379) = 2.963 V
Check: V25 = 25 i2 = 25 (0.1186) = 2.965 V 2.963 V
Also, V1 – V4 = 5 – 4.173 = 0.827 V V10 = 10 (0.1186 – 0.0359) = 0.827 V
Let’s verify our answers
Mesh-Current AnalysisWhat if there’s a current source?
5
Mesh 2: vs = R2 (i2 – i1) + R3 i2
Mesh 1: i1 = is
1 equation with 1 unknown
Mesh-Current AnalysisWhat if there’s a dependent source?
6
Supermesh: 7 = 2 i1 + 1 i2
2nd Equation: 2 i1 = i2 – i1
Dependent sources are no big deal!
Node-Voltage Analysis
General circuit analysis method
Based on KCL and Ohm’s Law
Advantages: ALWAYS worksSimple to set up
Disadvantages: Leads to systems of equationsCan be tedious to solveCould be an easier method
Matrix methods (Cramer’s Rule) and computers can be very useful!
7
Node-Voltage AnalysisExample
Assume node voltages
Choice of reference node is arbitrary, but there is often a “best choice”
Write KCL equations for each node using node voltages
8
79 v1 – 15 v2 = 0
– 7 v1 + 15 v2 – 8 v3 = – 224
– 6 v2 + 41 v3 = 0
Reference Node
Node 1: 08
VV
5
V
3
V 2111
Node 2: 047
VV
8
VV 3212
Node 3: 03
V
2
V
7
VV 3323
Node-Voltage AnalysisExample
9
79 v1 – 15 v2 = 0
– 7 v1 + 15 v2 – 8 v3 = – 224
– 6 v2 + 41 v3 = 0Reference Node (V=0)
Using Cramer’s Rule:
v1 = – 3.40 V
v2 = – 17.92 V
v3 = – 2.62 V
Check (iin = iout):
A13313
403.
.
A6805
403.
.
A81518
4039217.
..
A1862
7
6229217.
..
Don’t let the signs confuse you!Use absolute values and determine
current direction (Vhigh to Vlow).
A3112
622.
.
A87303
622.
.
Node 1: 1.133 + 0.68 = 1.813
Node 2: 1.815 + 2.186 = 4.001
Node 3: 1.31 + 0.873 = 2.183
Node-Voltage AnalysisWhat if there’s a voltage source?
10
Supernode
Supernode:
Second Equation: V1 – V2 = 9
02000
V
3000
V
5000
V
3000
3V 2211
Node-Voltage AnalysisWhat if there’s a dependent source?
11
Dependent sources are no big deal!
Supernode
Supernode:
Second Equation: V2 – V1 = 3 Ix
3220
V
50
V 21
50
VI 1
x 50
V3VV 1
12
Extra Tools for your ToolboxThevenin and Norton Equivalents
12
When “looking into” two ports of a circuit, you cannot tell exactly what components make up that circuit.
Vth = Vopen ckt
Ishort ckt
cktshort
cktopenth I
VR
In = Ishort ckt
cktshort
cktopenn I
VR
Thevenin Equivalent Norton Equivalent
Thevenin and Norton EquivalentsExample
13
Vopen ckt =
3ix
Open circuit case:
= 10 (i10) = 10 (3 ix)V10
72
310= = V7
60
Supermesh: 10 = 5 ix + 10 (3 ix) A72
=10 = 35 ix
3510
ix =
Short circuit case: Supermesh: 10 = 5 ix ix = 2
Ishort ckt = 3 ix = 6 A
3ix
Vth = 60/7 V, In = 6 A, and Rth = Rn = 10/7
7
10A6V
IV
RR 760
cktshort
cktopennth
The short-circuit case is a different circuit than the original problem!
Extra Tools for your ToolboxSource Transformations
14
mA51000
5R
VI
series
ss
Rshunt = Rseries = 1 k
1 k5 mA
Rseries
Vs RshuntIs Rshunt
Extra Tools for your ToolboxSuperposition Principle
15
In general, if a circuit has more than one source, we can determine the response of the circuit to ALL sources by analyzing the circuit considering one source at a time (ignoring the other sources), then combining all the partial responses to get the total response.
This is called the superposition principle.
It sounds like a great idea, but it has some caveats when applied to electric circuits…
Extra Tools for your ToolboxSuperposition Principle
16
Caveats when using the Superposition Principle
1. Only linear quantities (voltage, current) can be found using superposition – nonlinear quantities (power) cannot.
2. Dependent sources cannot be ignored. For this reason, superposition is of limited (questionable) use on circuits containing dependent sources.
Comment: The superposition principle is very useful in other areas (such as electromagnetics, and several non-EE fields), but it seldom (if ever) simplifies the process of analyzing a circuit.
Recommendation: Use another method.