Upload
vanmien
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Page 1
City Sanitation Plan Page 3
CITY SANITATION PLAN
CONTENTS
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
� City Sanitation Task Force
� Town Map
� Swachhata
� Approach And Methodology
� Components Of CSP
� National Urban Sanitation Policy
� City Sanitation Plan
� Need For CSP
� What Is CSP
� Why CSP
� City Profile
� General Profile
� Land Use
� City Map
� Ward Wise Households &Population
II. OPEN DEFECATION FREE
� Open Defecation Free City
� Pie Chart
� Profile
� Location Of Community/Public Toilet
� Map Showing Location Of Toilet
� Public Toilet/Free Urinal Image
� Individual Household Toilet Image
III. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
� Solid Waste Management
� Need For SWM
� The Objectives Of Project
� Demographics
� Municipal Administration
� Population Growth
� Projection Of Population and Generation of Solid Waste
� Details Of House Holds & Other Infrastructures
� The MSW Mandate
� Components And Status Of Compliance
� Quantification Of Solid Waste
� Characterization Of Solid Waste
City Sanitation Plan Page 4
� Solid Waste Management Completed Works
� Transportation &Equipments
� Biomethanation Plant
� Waste Pyramid
� Process Design For MSW Composting
Unit � Recovery Of Recycling
� Green Belt Development
� Solid Waste Management Improvement 2015-2016
IV. WATER SUPPLY
� City Salient Features
� Map Showing Water Supply Distribution
System � Schematic Diagram
� Existing & Proposed Water Supply
System � Amrut 2016-2017
V. UNDER GROUND DRAINAGE
SYSTEM � UGSS Details
� City Salient Features
� UGS Pumping Station
Details � STP
� Sludge Digester
� Amrut 2016-
2017
VI. OPEN DRAIN & STORM WATER
CHANNEL � Desilting Report
� Desilting Of Channels
Estimate � Length Of Drains
� Mosquito Control
VII. INFORMATION EDUCATION & COMMUNICATION
� Public Participation In SWM
� Decentralized Waste Management System
� Public Information,Education,Communication Programs(Iec)
� Capacity Building In Msw Management
� Safety And Precautions In Swm
City Sanitation Plan Page 5
GENERAL
INFORMATION
City Sanitation Plan Page 6
City Sanitation Task Force
• Special officer / Chairman / Councilors
• Corporation Commissioner
• City Health Officer
• Executive Engineer
• Assistant Executive Engineer / Assistant Enginner
• Sanitary Officers
• Sanitary Inspectors
• Sanitary Supervisors
• NGO / Voluntary Organization / SHGS
• Stake holders
• Sanitation Private Agency
• Sanitary Workers
City Sanitation Plan Page 7
City Sanitation Plan Page 8
Methodology For CSP:
City Sanitation Plan Page 9
• City Sanitation Mainly based on the five basic
amenities illustrated in the diagram Shown below.
City Sanitation Plan Page 10
Approach and Methodology
City Sanitation Plan Page 11
COMPONENTS OF CSP
Water Supply
• Sewage
• Storm water drainage
• Solid Waste Management
• Information, Education and Communication
• Environment
• Open defection free
City Sanitation Plan Page 12
National Urban sanitation Policy (NUSP)
National Urban Sanitation Policy (NUSP) has been
formulated by Government of India with a vision to provide
appropriate Sanitation facilities in all cities/towns. State have
to prepare State Sanitation Strategies and cities/towns are
required to prepare city Sanitation Plans (CSPs) as per NUSP
guidelines,so as to improve health and environmental
outcomes. The CSP is a vision document on sanitation with 20
to 25 years horizon with short term town level action plans
for five years to achieve sanitation goals. CSP envisages
achieving the following outputs
� Open Defecation free status. � Elimination of manual Scavenging and safety of
sanitry workers. � Prepare disposal of rain water and storm water
drainage. � Recycle and reuse of treated waste water for non-
potable applications. � Solid waste fully collected and safely disposed of
scientifically. � Serving the unserved with basic minimum services. � Measures for improved public health and
environmental standards.
City Sanitation Plan Page 13
CITY SANITATION PLAN
• Open defecation free town
• Providing individual households toilets to all households in the city
• Maintenance of Community / Public Toilets in a hygenic manner
• Providing protected water supply to all households in the town.
• Safe disposal of sewage water in UGD scheme.
• Providing UGD connection to all households / Commercial / Public & Private institutions.
• Drainage and storm water drainage to be strengthened and well maintenance of the same.
• 100% door to door Segregated Garbage Collection.
• Bulk waste garbage generators to dispose bio waste.
• Municipal solid waste to be collected and disposed scientifically.
• Reclamation of existing dumpsite.
• Dry recyclable waste are to be collected once in a week.
• Recyclable waste are to be sold to the recyclers and the amount disbursed among sanitary workers concerned.
• Garbage free Kumbakonam to be achieved.
• Providing safety equipments to all sanitary workers.
• Setting up of MCC centers so that all bio waste are disposed at the site.
• Capacity building / Training programs for all staff.
City Sanitation Plan Page 14
• Medical camp / Eye camp to be organized at periodical
intervals.
• Providing Medical facilities to all citizens in the town.
Need for CSP
• To achieve the goal of universal sanitation
• To develop access to safe and hygienic sanitation facility and
arrangements (individual or community toilets) to all urban
population so that no one defecates in the open
• To develop adequate availability and 100 percent upkeep and
management of public sanitation facilities in all urban areas like
commercial areas, offices, institution and service centres etc.
• To ensure scientific collection, treatment and safe disposal and
establish appropriate and feasible technology of disposal system
for human excreta & liquid waste from all sanitation facilities
and establish appropriate system of operation & maintenance of
the disposal system.
City Sanitation Plan Page 15
What is CSP?
The CSP is a vision document on Sanitation with 20 to 25
years horizon with short term town level action plans for 3-5
years to achieve sanitation goals as per above stated objections.
Broad areas to be covered in CSP are:
• Awareness generation
• Sanitary choices and Technical options
• Operation & Maintenance and service Delivery system
• Institutional Responsibilities
• Reaching the un-served and poor households
• Legal and Regulatory Institutional Responsibilities
• Planning and Financing
• Capacity Building & Training
• Implementation Management
• Monitoring & Evaluation and supervision
• City Reward Schemes.
City Sanitation Plan Page 16
WHY CSP
• Facilitate vision on a long term perspective.
• Sanitation aspect should be approached to ensure
effectiveness
• Long term vision on transion to a 100% sanitized city.
• To understand the cost and user charges implications.
• Ensure proper assessment of codex and investment
phasing
• Awareness and sensitization of community.
City Sanitation Plan Page 17
CITY PROFILE Particulars Description
Name of the Corporation Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation
District Thanjavur
Year of Establishment 14-02-2014
Population (As per 2011 census)
222619
Population as on 2013 229619
Floating Population 30,000
No. of sanitary divisions 14
No. of Wards 51
No of Household 52750
No. of slums 66
No of Slaughter Houses 1
No of Markets 9
No of commercial establishments(small shops)
2995
No of Hotels 316
Waste generation per day 121 MT
Waste collection per day 110 MT
Collection efficiency 91%
Per capita waste generation 450 gms/capita/day
Coverage door-to-door collection of waste
6% (In 5 wards)
City Sanitation Plan Page 18
LAND USE
S. No. Category Area in sq.km
1 Residential 20.13
2 Commercial 1.11
3 Industrial 0.83
4 Educational 1.08
5 Public and Semi Public 3.20
6 Agricultural 9.96
Total Developed Area 36.31 sq.km
City Sanitation Plan Page 20
City map
City Sanitation Plan Page 21
Ward Wise HouseHold &Mid year 2017
Population
S. No Ward No. Population
1 1 4117
2 2 5929
3 3 5660
4 4 5758
5 5 4858
6 6 6034
7 7 4653
8 8 1955
9 9 5792
10 10 4875
11 11 5897
12 12 4256
13 13 2682
14 14 4547
15 15 2555
16 16 3732
17 17 3433
18 23 3020
19 24 2782
20 25 2243
21 26 3561
22 22 4101
23 27 2259
24 28 2667
25 29 4129
26 30 5432
27 31 4134
28 32 5968
29 33 2388
30 34 3600
31 44 8708
32 35 2605
33 42 4683
34 43 2867
35 45 5621
36 20 6132
37 21 4945
City Sanitation Plan Page 22
38 36 6102
39 37 4569
40 38 4282
41 39 6001
42 40 5502
43 41 5267
44 46 6149
45 47 2874
46 48 3080
47 49 4064
48 50 2795
49 51 7367
50 18 3443
51 19 4133
Total 224206
City Sanitation Plan Page 23
OPEN DEFECATION
FREE CITY
City Sanitation Plan Page 24
Open Defecation Free Awareness :
City Sanitation Plan Page 25
HOUSE HOLD TOILET
The diagram below explains the households with Toilets
(92%)
o Households using Community Toilets(8%).
92%
8%
Household with Toilets
Household using
Community Toilets
City Sanitation Plan Page 26
PROFILE
INDICATORS NO.S PERCENTAGE
TOTAL POPULATION(AS MID YEAR 2017)
224206
TOTAL NO.OF HOUSEHOLDS(AS PER2011 CENSUS)
45538
TOTAL NO.OF HOUSEHOLDS(AS PER 2017)
54438
NO.OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH TOILETS
50269
92%
NO.OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH OUT TOILETS
4169
8%
NO.OF TO BE COVERED UNDER IHHL
1862
NO.OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH OUT LAND
2388
POPULATION USING HOUSE HOLD TOILETS
201076
POPULATION NOT USING PUBLIC TOILETS
201076
PUBLIC & COMMUNITY
70
PUBLIC&COMMUNITY TOILETS USABLE
195
PUBLIC&COMMUNITY TOILETS NON USABLE
0
City Sanitation Plan Page 27
SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
28
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
29
Municipal Solid Waste Management in Thanjavur -
Overview
The management of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) has become one of the essential obligatory
functions of the Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) in India. Most of the urban areas in the country face
difficulty in managing solid waste, due to poor financial conditions and this lead to problems of
health, sanitation and environmental degradation. Awareness among the Public is also not good
enough, The Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organisation (CPHEEO) under
Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD), Government of India (GoI) has published a Manual on
MSW Management (CPHEEO Manual) as a guideline so as to assist the ULBs and private agencies to
implement best waste management practices. Honourable Supreme Court of India ordered the GoI
and State Governments to enforce the MSW (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000 notified by
the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), GoI with spirit immediately. Hence, it is
mandatory for the ULBs to manage the MSW generated within its limits.
Thanjavur is administered by a municipal corporation covering an area of 36.33 km2 (14.03 sq mi)
and had a population of 222,619 in 2011. Thanjavur is one of the fastest developing cities in the
State of Tamil Nadu. Being an emerging city, there is inadequacy in physical and social
infrastructure facilities. Realizing the inadequate facility for Municipal Solid Waste, Thanjavur City
Municipal Corporation (TCMC) has taken up initiatives to improve the existing system of managing
the MSW through several schemes. Accordingly, the TCMC has appointed M/s InfraEn (India) Pvt.
Ltd. for “Preparing Detailed Project Reports for an Integrated Municipal Solid Waste System for
Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation”.
Objective
The objectives of the proposed consultancy assignment are as follows:
i. To study & analyze the existing Solid Waste Management System, review the
various problems faced and to review the material available with the Corporation.
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
30
ii. To prepare a Detailed Project Report for improving the existing Solid Waste
Management practice in Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation & incorporate the
viable suggestions & prepare bid documents etc,
iii. To prepare the tender documents and carry out Bid process Management
including supporting evaluation and selection of contractors / operators.
Scope of Work
The scope of work covers the service area covering Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation limits and
shall include:
i. Population Estimates based on the census data using appropriate projection techniques.
ii. Estimation of the MSW generation within the corporation limits.
iii. Study of current practices in the primary Collection and Transportation of MSW.
iv. Study of current practices in the secondary collection and transportation of MSW.
v. Study of the existing waste processing and disposal practices.
vi. Suggestions and recommendations for improving the collection and
transportation as well as processing and disposal of MSW generated in the
Corporation.
vii. Detailed financial analysis on the proposed improvements in the solid waste
management practices.
viii. Proposed implementation models for the project (s) as suggested in the DPR.
ix. Transaction advisory services for the various projects as approved by the state
government including submission of tender documents and bid process
management.
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
31
TOWN PROFILE
Introduction
Thanjavur, formerly Tanjore, is a citin the south Indian state of Tamil Nadu. Thanjavur is an
important center of South Indian religion, art, and architecture. Most of the Great Living Chola
Temples, which are UNESCO World Heritage Monuments, are located in and around Thanjavur. The
foremost among these, the Brihadeeswara Temple, is located in the centre of the city. Thanjavur is
also home to Tanjore painting, a painting style unique to the region. Thanjavur is administered by a
municipal corporation covering an area of 36.33 km2 (14.03 sq mi) and had a population of
222,619 in 2011.
Exhibit 1: Location Map of Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
32
Exhibit 2: Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation Profile
Particulars Description
Name of the Corporation Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation
District Thanjavur
Year of Establishment 14-02-2014
Population (As per 2011 census) 222619
Population as on 2013 229619
Floating Population 30,000
No. of sanitary divisions 14
No. of Wards 51
No of Household 52750
No. of slums 66
No of Slaughter Houses 1
No of Markets 9
No of commercial establishments(small shops) 2995
No of Hotels 316
Waste generation per day 121 MT
Waste collection per day 110 MT
Collection efficiency 91%
Per capita waste generation 450 gms/capita/day
Coverage door-to-door collection of waste 6% (In 5 wards)
Source: Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation
Government of Tamil Nadu announced for upgrade of Thanjavur Special Grade Municipality to City
Municipal Corporation of Thanjavur. Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation is a civic body that
governs Thanjavur city, India. This corporation consists of 51 wards and the legislative body is
headed by an elected Chairperson assisted by a Deputy Chairperson and 49 councilors who
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
33
represent each wards in the city. This will be upgraded to Mayor and Deputy-Mayor in near future.
Scholars believe the name Thanjavur is derived from Tanjan, a legendary demon in Hindu
mythology. While the early history of Thanjavur remains unclear, the city first rose to prominence
during the reign of Medieval Cholas when it served as the capital of the empire. After the fall of
Cholas, the city was ruled by various dynasties like Pandyas, Vijayanagar Empire, Madurai Nayaks,
Thanjavur Nayaks, Thanjavur Marathas and the British Empire. It has been a part of independent
India since 1947.
History
Thanjavur, formerly Tanjore is a city which is the headquarters of the Thanjavur District in the
south Indian state of Tamil Nadu. Scholars believe the name Thanjavur is derived from Tanjan, a
legendary demon in Hindu mythology. While the early history of Thanjavur remains unclear, the
city first rose to prominence during the reign of Medieval Cholas when it served as the capital of the
empire. After the fall of Cholas, the city was ruled by various dynasties like Pandyas, Vijayanagar
Empire, Madurai Nayaks, Thanjavur Nayaks, Thanjavur Marathas and the British Empire. It has
been a part of independent India since 1947.
Thanjavur is an important centre of South Indian religion, art, and architecture. Most of the Great
Living Chola Temples, which are UNESCO World Heritage Monuments, are located in and around
Thanjavur.
The foremost among these, the Brihadeeswara Temple, is located in the centre of the city.
Thanjavur is also home to Tanjore painting, a painting style unique to the region. The city is an
important agricultural centre located in the Cauvery Delta and is known as the "Rice bowl of Tamil
Nadu".
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
34
Location
Thanjavur, located at 10° 45‟ N latitude and 79° 8‟ E longitude is at a distance of 350 km from
Chennai, the state headquarter in the western direction. The river Vennar on the north and Trichy
Chennai Railway enclose the major part of the city. The newly extended area of the city lies on the
south-west side of the railway line.
The city is bounded by revenue villages viz., Akkama Thottam, Manakkarambai, Palliya Agrharam
and Ramapuram at the north, Kurungalur, Gudalur, Kodikalur, Kadakadabbhai, Ayushahib Thottam
at the south and Ramanthapuram Meleveli, Vellur groups at the West. The city spreads over an area
of 36.31 sq.km and the Local Planning Area containing Villages extends over 109.41 sq.km.
Topography
The tributaries of river Cauvery, namely, the Grand Anaicut canal (Pudhaaru), Vadavaaru and
Vennaaru rivers flow through the city. Thanjavur is situated in the Cauvery delta, at a distance of
314 km (195 mi) south-west of Chennai and 56 km (35 mi) east of Tiruchirappalli. While the plains
immediately adjoining the Cauvery river have been under cultivation from time immemorial, most
of Thanjavur city and the surrounding areas lie in the "New Delta" – a dry, barren upland tract
which has been brought under irrigation during the early 19th century. To the south of Thanjavur
city, is the Vallam tableland, a small plateau interspersed at regular intervals by ridges of sandstone.
The nearest seaport is Nagapattinam which is 84 km (52 mi) east of Thanjavur. The nearest airport
is Tiruchirapalli International Airport, located at a distance of 56 km (35 mi). The city has an
elevation of 57 m (187 ft) above mean sea level. The total area of the city is 36.33 sq.km (14.03 sq
mi).
Land Use Pattern
The city land use has been classified under the following major classification based on Land Use
Survey by DTCP, 2008.
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
35
Exhibit 3: Land-Use Break-Up
S. No. Category Area in sq.km
1 Residential 20.13
2 Commercial 1.11
3 Industrial 0.83
4 Educational 1.08
5 Public and Semi Public 3.20
6 Agricultural 9.96
Total Developed Area 36.31 sq.km
Source: Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation
Climate and Soil
The climate of Thanjavur is fairly healthy. The Period from November and February in Thanjavur is
pleasant, with a climate full of warm days and cool nights. By the close of February, the climate
becomes rather sultry and during March and April, the climate becomes hot reaching its peak by the
close of May or early June. The average temperatures range from 22.71°C in January to 33.46°C in
May and June.
The rainfall during South-West monsoon period is much lower than that of North-East monsoon.
North-East monsoon is beneficial to the district at large because of the heavy rainfall and the
Western Ghats feeding the river Cauvery. The average rainfall is 37 inches (940 mm), most of which
is contributed by the North-East monsoon.
The soil available in this area is mainly of red ferruginous type. They are as fertile as richer, which
comes in the next order, but irrigated crops are raised chiefly with the help of Grand Anicut canal.
This area has a gentle slope towards from west to east and devoid of hills.
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
36
Exhibit 4: Climate data for Thanjavur
Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year
Average
high
°C 29.2 32 35 37.1 38.5 36.3 34.6 34 34 33 29.5 28.3 33.46
°F 84.6 89.6 95 98.8 101.3 97.3 94.3 93.2 93.2 91.4 85.1 82.9 92.23
Average
low
°C 18.2 19.2 21.3 24.8 26.3 26 25.1 24.6 24.1 22.9 20.8 19.2 22.71
°F 64.8 66.6 70.3 70.3 79.3 78.8 77.2 76.3 75.4 73.2 69.4 66.6 72.88
Precipitat
ion
mm 33 13 15 32 55 43 55 105 126 165 182 115 939
inches 1.3 0.5 0.6 1.3 2.2 1.7 2.2 4.1 5.0 6.5 7.2 4.5 37.0
Source: Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture
Transportation
The city is well connected by roads with the adjoining towns viz., Tiruchirapalli, Kumbakonam,
Thiruvarur, Mannargudi, and Pudukkottai, which fall in radius of about 50 km. Roadways are the
major means of transportation, while the city also has rail connectivity. The nearest airport is
Tiruchirapalli International Airport, located 56 km (35 mi) away from the city. The nearest seaport
is Nagapattinam Port, which is 84 km (52 mi) away from Thanjavur.
Demography
According to 2011 census, Thanjavur had a population of 222,943 with a sex-ratio of 1,042 females
for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 19,860 were under the
age of six, constituting 10,237 males and 9,623 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
accounted for 9.22% and .21% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was
83.14%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. There were a total of 78,005 workers,
comprising 803 cultivators, 2,331 main agricultural labourers, 2,746 in house
hold industries, 65,211 other workers, 6,914 marginal workers, 110 marginal cultivators, 235
marginal agricultural labourers, 322 marginal workers in household industries and 6,247 other
marginal workers.
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
37
Exhibit 5: Ward-wise Population Details
S. No Division Ward No. Population
1
1
1 4117
2 2 5929
3 3 5660
4 4 5758
5 5 4858
6
2
6 6034
7 7 4653
8 8 1955
9 9 5792
10 10 4875
11
3
11 5897
12 12 4256
13 13 2682
14 14 4547
15 15 2555
16
4
16 3732
17 17 3433
18 23 3020
19 24 2782
20 25 2243
21 26 3561
22 5
22 4101
23 27 2259
24 6
28 2667
25 29 4129
26 30 5432
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
38
27
7
31 4134
28 32 5968
29 33 2388
30 34 3600
31 44 8708
32
8
35 2605
33 42 4683
34 43 2867
35 45 5621
36 9
20 6132
37 21 4945
38 36 6102
39 10
37 4569
40 38 4282
41 11
39 6001
42 40 5502
43 41 5267
44
12
46 6149
45 47 2874
46 48 3080
47 49 4064
48 13
50 2795
49 51 7367
50 14
18 3443
51 19 4133
Total 224206
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
39
Economy
The major occupation of the inhabitants of the city is tourism and service-oriented industry, while
the traditional occupation is agriculture. Thanjavur is known as the "Rice bowl of Tamil Nadu".The
total percentage of land fit for cultivation is 58%. There are three seasons for agriculture in
Thanjavur – Kuruvai (June to September), Samba (August to January) and Thaladi (September,
October to February, March). The total rice production has been maintained at 10.615 L.M.T and
7.077 L.M.T. Though agriculture is the main economic activity, only 7% of the population is
involved in it. There is a lot of agricultural related trading that forms the key economic activity in
the city.
Thanjavur is an important centre of silk weaving in Tamil Nadu. There were 200 silk weaving units
in the city in 1991 with around 80,000 people working in them. The city produces bell metal craft
like Thanjavur metal plates, bronze images bowls, napkins and powder boxes made of copper and
bronze. The city is a major manufacturer of pith works consisting of models of Hindu idols,
mosques, garlands and other bird figurines. Manufacture of musical instruments like veena,
tambura, violin, mrithamgam, thavil and kanjira is another economic activity in the city.
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
40
EXISTING STATUS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
Field Visit and Study
The existing system of waste management system was studied through field visits and verification
of details provided by the ULBs through consultation. This has been carried out for each stage of
present MSWM system which is detailed below.
During the field visits, the waste collection mechanism followed by the ULBs from door to door
collection to disposal at the dumping yard including the financial capabilities of the ULBs for
implementing waste management project have been carefully observed and further discussed with
the ULBs.
Data Collection
Prior to the field visit, preparatory work has been carried out for understanding the study area and
for easy collection of qualitative/quantitative data and information from corresponding
departments in TCMC. Data Collection Checklist was designed and considering the stated objective,
scope of the assignments and clear appreciation of the need for the project. The draft checklist of
various data collection mechanisms has been discussed with TCMC officials during the
commencement meeting.
As per the planning and preliminary work, the data collection format was presented to TCMC in the
presence of engineers and other officials. Primary data was collected through field visits,
interviewing officials and sanitary workers. Areas like residential areas, commercial areas, roads,
water bodies, markets, disposal sites, hospitals, industries etc. were also covered during the field
visits. Secondary data was collected by gathering information from records maintained by the
Medical Health Officer and Municipal Engineers. The available information and records maintained
by Corporation was compiled according to the in to the data formats. The data collection checklist
format is given as Annexure 1.
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
41
Stakeholder Meeting
After the visit and discussions, further stake holder meetings were conducted in the presence of
Medical Health Officer and Assistant Engineer to discuss the issues on existing practices of MSWM
system. During the meeting, the discussions were also held regarding the need for primary and
secondary collection requirement including manpower requirements. The list of attendees
attended during stake holder meeting is given in Annexure 2.
Exhibit 6: Stakeholder Meeting at MHO Cabin
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
42
Survey of Primary and Secondary Collection and Transportation System
Annexure 4 & 5 shows the survey report for Primary and secondary collection and transportation
system.
Waste Characterization Studies
It is essential to know about the information on the nature of wastes, its composition, physical and
chemical characteristics and the quantities generated for the better planning of a mechanized
MSWM system. Waste composition data is a useful primarily steps to find out whether materials
recovery, composting, or waste to energy techniques might be an economic disposal option.
Sampling program of selected towns was determined based on the size of population and spatial
locations. A reputed laboratory was appointed for conducting the waste characterization studies
(physical and chemical analysis). The composition and sampling procedure based on the CPHEEO
Manual was followed.
Method of Sample Collection for Physical and Chemical Analysis
Major collection sites are identified which are covering a larger size of population when collecting
samples of MSW. Based on the type of area such as residential, commercial, industrial, market, slum
etc. sampling points are distributed uniformly all over the study area. The sampling points are
further classified based on economic status of population such as high, middle and low income
group. About 10 kgs of MSW is collected from ten points from outside and inside of the solid waste
heap. The total quantity of 100 kg of waste so collected is thoroughly mixed and then segregated
physically for Physical composition.
Then the same technique is followed for further analysis for chemical study and then reduced by
method of quartering till a sample of such a size is obtained which can be handled in the laboratory.
The sample so obtained is subjected to physical analysis, determination of moisture and then the
sample is processed for further chemical analysis. Samples collected for physical and chemical
analysis are double bagged in plastic bags sealed and sent to the laboratory for
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation.
43
analysis, each sample being in the range 10 to 12 kgs. The Annexure 3 shows the photograph for
conducting the sampling programme for physical and chemical composition studies.
TCMC Organization Structure
The SWM and City Sanitation department has about 457 employees. The department is headed by a
Medical Health Officer (MHO) who reports to the Municipal Engineer (ME), who further reports to
the Commissioner (City). The Sanitary Inspector (SI), assisted by Sanitary Supervisor (SS) and their
staff manages street sweeping and primary collection work. The entire area of TCMC is divided into
51 administrative wards. For operational convenience, these wards are divided in 14 zones.
Exhibit 7: Staffing Details in SWM Department
S. No. Designation Norms* Permanent staff available
1 Medical Health Officer 1 1
2 Sanitary Inspector 20 13
3 Sanitary Supervisor 25 19**
4 Sanitary Works 660 417
5 Drivers - 7
Total 707 457
* based on CPHEEO manual;
** As per latest survey, recruited one SS in 1st Division
The work at the zonal level is managed by a Sanitary Inspector while a Sanitary Supervisor (SS)
handles the work at the ward level. The SI is responsible for maintaining of cleanliness on roads
and daily collection of refuse from ward areas. He takes instructions from the MHO for technical
matters and from the Ward Officer on administrative matters.
Commissioner
Medical Health Officer
SI
Div. 1
SI
Div. 2
SI
Div. 3 SI
Div. 4
SI
Div. 5
SI
Div. 6
SI
Div. 7
SI
Div. 8
SI
Div. 9
SI
Div. 10 & 11
SI SI SI
Div. 12 Div. 13 Div. 14
SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
SS SS SS SS
SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
Technical cum Transaction Advisory for Preparation of Draft DPR for Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management for Thanjavur City
Municipal Corporation.
Exhibit 8: Present Organization Structure
Sanitary Workers: 417 Nos.; Drivers: 7 Nos.
23
24
Waste Quantification
The quantity of MSW generated depends on a number of factors such as food habits, standard of
living, degree of commercial activities and seasons. Data on quantity variation and generation are
useful in planning for collection and disposal systems. Indian cities now generate eight times more
MSW than they did in 1947 because of increasing urbanization and changing life styles.
The rate of increase of MSW generated per capita is estimated at 1 to 1.33% annually. MSW
generation rates in small towns are lower than those of metro cities, and the per capita generation
rate of MSW in India ranges from 0.2 to 0.5 kg/ day. Average per-capita generation of municipal
solid waste as per the CPHEEO Manual is indicated in Exhibit
Exhibit 9: Average Per-Capita Solid waste Generation in Indian Cities
Population Range (Million) Kg/capita/day
< 0.10 0.21
0.1 – 0.15 0.21
0.5 - 1.0 0.25
1.0 - 2.0 0.27
2.0 - 5.0 0.35
> 5.0 0.50
> 5.0 in metros 0.60
Source: CPHEEO Manual on MSWM May 2000
3.3.1 Source of Waste Generation in TCMC
As per data collection checklist and survey, it is estimated that every day 121 MT of garbage is
generated in the Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation. The major sources of domestic waste
include households, marriage halls, markets and commercial establishment. The collection
efficiency of MSW is 91% and waste collection per day is 110 MT.
25
Exhibit 10: Source of Waste Generation in TCMC
S. No. Type of Waste Generator Quantity in MT
1 Residential Waste 88.00
2 Commercial Waste 10.00
3 Slaughter Waste 3.00
4 Market, Hotel, Restaurant and Marriage Hall Waste 20.00
Total 121.00
Waste generation per day 121 MT
Waste collection per day 110 MT
Collection efficiency 91%
Per capita waste generation 526 gms/capita/day
Source: TCMC and Survey done by InfraEn
3.3 Waste Composition and
Characterization Study
As compared to the western countries, MSW differs greatly with regard to the composition and
hazardous nature, in India. MSW contains compostable organic matter (fruit and vegetable peels,
food waste), recyclables (paper, plastic, glass, metals, etc.), and inerts.
MSW composition at generation sources and collection points, determined on a wet weight basis,
consists mainly of a large organic fraction (40–60%), ash and fine earth (30–40%), paper (3–6%)
and plastic, glass and metals (each less than 1%).
The C/N ratio ranges between 20 and 30, and the lower calorific value ranges between 800 and
1000 kcal/kg. Based on the characterization study conducted in various Indian cities by National
Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) during, the physical and chemical
characterization of Municipal solid waste is following the below Exhibit.
26
Exhibit 11: Physical Characteristics of MSW in Indian Cities
Population
Range (in
million)
Number
of Cities
Surveyed
Percent Composition of Municipal Solid Waste
Paper
Rubber,
Leather &
Synthetics
Glass
Metals
Total
compostable
matter
Inert
Total
0.1 - 0.5 12 2.91 0.78 0.56 0.33 44.57 43.59 100
0.5 - 1.0 15 2.95 0.73 0.35 0.32 40.04 48.38 100
1.0 - 2.0 9 4.71 0.71 0.46 0.49 38.95 44.57 100
2.0 - 5.0 3 3.18 0.48 0.48 0.59 56.67 49.07 100
> 5.0 4 6.43 0.28 0.94 0.80 30.48 53.90 100
All values are calculated on net weight basis
Source: Manual on Solid Waste Management, NEERI, 1996
Exhibit 12: Chemical Characteristics of MSW in Indian Cities
Population
Range (in
million)
Moisture
Organic
Matter
Chemical Characteristics
Nitrogen
as Total
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
as P2O5
Potassium as
K2O
C/N
Ratio
Calorific
value in
kcal/kg
0.1 - 0.5 25.81 37.09 0.71 0.63 0.83 30.94 1009.89
0.5 - 1.0 19.52 25.19 0.66 0.56 0.69 21.13 900.61
1.0 - 2.0 26.98 26.98 0.64 0.82 0.72 23.68 980.05
2.0 - 5.0 21.03 25.60 0.56 0.69 0.78 22.45 907.18
> 5.0 38.72 39.07 0.56 0.52 0.52 30.11 800.70
All values, except moisture, are on dry weight basis
Source: Manual on Solid Waste Management, NEERI, 1996
3.3.1 Result of Physical Composition Study
The result of physical composition study for MSW in Thanjavur City Municipal Corporation is given in
following exhibit.
Exhibit 13: Result of Physical Composition Study
Sampling Date: 09.09.2014
27
Sampling Location: Sreenivasapuram Dumpsite
Weight of the Sample: 111.5 kg
28
S. No. Components Weight in kg Composition in %
1 Food Waste 10 8.97
2 Leaf Waste 60 53.81
3 Plastic Bottle & Others 0.5 0.45
4 Plastic Covers 10 8.97
5 Paper 5 4.48
6 Rubber 0.5 0.45
7 Glass 1.5 1.35
8 Metal 0.5 0.45
9 Cloths 13 11.66
10 Thermocoal 0.5 0.45
11 Wood 1 0.90
12 Inert 7 6.28
13 Bio-Medical waste 2 1.79
Total 111.5 100
Exhibit 14: Graphical Result of Physical Composition Study
29
Source Segregation
It is observed that the source segregation is not practiced in the TCMC due to lack of awareness.
Primary Collection System
Existing system of MSW collection is performed by the TCMC with the help of Pushcarts. Waste
collected through this equipment is then transferred to compactor and dumper placer bins for
secondary collection and onward transportation. About 121 MT of waste is collected on a daily
basis.
Presently, collection is managed by a combination of municipal sanitary workers. An assortment of
vehicles has been deployed by TCMC for primary collection. Nearly 219 Push Carts (Capacity – 100
kg/unit) are utilized for the aforementioned purpose. There are 156 compactor bins and 20
dumper placer bins placed at specific collection points.
Sanitary workers sweep the streets and collect garbage in heaps and transfer the same into bins
provided for the purpose. Dual Dumper Placer vehicles and Compactors are then used to convey the
garbage from the collection point to the disposal site.
Exhibit 15: Summary of Primary Collection System
S. No. Division No. Ward No. Door to Door Bins
Push Carts Compactor Dumper Placer
1
1
1 3 0 0
2 2 5 0 2
3 3 3 1 0
4 4 3 0 2
5 5 3 0 1
6
2
6 7 1 2
7 7 6 1 2
8 8 2 2 1
9 9 5 3 0
10 10 5 0 0
11 3 11 3 3 0
30
12 12 2 3 0
13 13 4 1 0
14 14 3 4 0
15 15 3 1 0
16
4
16 2 0 0
17 17 2 0 0
18 23 2 6 0
19 24 2 0 0
20 25 3 6 0
21 26 4 13 0
22 5
22 5 14 0
23 27 4 7 2
24 6
28 4 0 0
25 29 5 6 0
26 30 5 3 0
27
7
31 3 6 0
28 32 4 2 0
29 33 4 4 0
30 34 3 2 0
31 44 8 5 0
32
8
35 4 7 0
33 42 7 2 0
34 43 2 0 0
35 45 4 1 1
36 9
20 9 4 2
37 21 7 0 1
38 36 6 4 2
39 10
37 3 5 0
40 38 4 3 0
41 11
39 9 5 0
42 40 8 5 0
43 41 5 8 0
44
12
46 4 7 0
45 47 2 1 0
46 48 2 0 0
47 49 2 5 0
48 13
50 7 7 0
49 51 15 12 2
50 14 18 9 3 0
31
51 19 7 0 0
Total 233 173 20
Secondary Collection and Transportation
System
The main objective of transportation is to clear waste from the city and dispose it off at the disposal
site. It is the responsibility of the local body to ensure the city is maintained in a hygienic manner by
transporting the wastes from the collection and temporary storage points to the waste processing
and disposal facility with the help of transportation fleet. The movement of wastes from the
households, street sweepings, etc. to the temporary storage collection points is the collective
responsibility of the Sanitary Workers and the citizens of the city. Transportation of waste involves
the following activities:
• Movement of vehicles to the various temporary storage points;
• Manual loading of wastes using baskets and other lifting tools;
• Lifting of wastes from the open yards on the way to the disposal site; and • Transportation to the disposal site.
Exhibit 16: Summary of Secondary Collection and Transportation System
S. No.
Particulars
Available
Vehicles in
Nos.
Volumetric
Capacity in
MTPD
Nos. of
Trips per
day
Quantity
Collected per
day in MT
1 Mini Auto 12 0.50 3 18.00
2 Mini Tipper Lorry 3 1.00 3 9.00
3 Tractor-Trailers 2 1.50 3 9.00
4 Tipper Lorry 6 1.50 4 36.00
5 Tractor 6 1.50 2 9.00
6 Dumper Placers 4 1.00 2 8.00
7 Compactor Trucks 1 7.00 3 21.00
8 JCB 1
Total 121 MT
32
Presently, 12 Mini Auto, 3 Mini Tipper, 2 Tractor Trailer, 6 Tipper Lorry, 2 private Tractors, 1
compactor and 4 dumper placer are utilized for collection and transfer of waste to the collection for
onward transportation and disposal. Transportation of waste from the collection points to the final
disposal site at Srinivasapuram is managed by 28 ULB owned vehicles. The ULB manages to collect
and transport approximately 121 MT of waste to the disposal site, based on varying number of trips
assigned and undertaken by these vehicles.
Processing and Disposal of MSW
Solid wastes collected from various locations in the city is disposed off by open dumping at the
Sreenivasapuram site, located at 20th ward in 9th division with an average 1.5 km distance from city
centre over an extent of approximately 20.11 acres. The existing dumping ground has been
reportedly used by Madurai Corporation for over 20 years. At present, Thanjavur City Municipal
Corporation do not have waste processing facility at the disposal site.
Exhibit 17: Sreenivasapuram Disposal Site
33
Exhibit 18: Details of Disposal Site
Location of the site Srinivasapuram
Total area of disposal Site 20.11 acres
Average distance to disposal site from city
centre 1.5 km
In which ward does it fall under Ward No. 20 and Division No. 9
Whether the land is owned by ULB Yes
Mode of Treatment and Disposal Open dumping
Facilities available in Sreenivasapuram
Dumpsite
The lists of facilities available in Sreenivasapuram dumpsite are as follows:
S. No. List of Facilities S. No. Available Machineries and
Vehicles
1 Curing Shed 1 RDF Machine
2 Bio-Methanation Plant – 5 TPD 2 Plastic Shredding Machine
3 Plastic Shredding Shed 3 Weigh Bridge
4 Toilets
5 Security Shed
6 Overhead Tank
7 Vehicle Washing Shed
8 DG Room
9 Storage Shed – 3 Nos.
10 Weigh Bridge Room
11 Office Room
12 Compound wall
13 Green Belt
Exhibit 19: Available
Exhibit 19: Available Facilities in Disposal Site
34
Facilities in Disposal Site
35
LEGAL COMPLIANCE
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
Definitions
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,
• "Environment" includes water, air and land and the inter- relationship which exists
among and between water, air and land, and human beings, other living creatures,
plants, micro- organism and property;
• "Environmental pollutant" means any solid, liquid or gaseous substance present in
such concentration as may be, or tend to be, injurious to environment;
• "Environmental pollution" means the presence in the environment of any
environmental pollutant;
• "Handling", in relation to any substance, means the manufacture, processing,
treatment, package, storage, transportation, use, collection, destruction, conversion,
offering for sale, transfer or the like of such substance;
• "Hazardous substance" means any substance or preparation which, by reason of its
chemical or physico-chemical properties or handling, is liable to cause harm to
human beings, other living creatures, plant, micro-organism, property or the
environment;
• "Occupier", in relation to any factory or premises, means a person who has, control
over the affairs of the factory or the premises and includes in relation to any
substance, the person in possession of the substance;
• "Prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this act.
Rules to regulate environmental pollution
The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules in respect of all or
any of the matters referred to in section. In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the
foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely,
36
• The standards of quality of air, water or soil for various areas and purposes;
• The maximum allowable limits of concentration of various environmental
pollutants (including noise) for different areas;
• The procedures and safeguards for the handling of hazardous substances;
• The prohibition and restrictions on the handling of hazardous substances in
different areas;
• The prohibition and restriction on the location of industries and the carrying on
process and operations in different areas;
• The procedures and safeguards for the prevention of accidents which may cause
environmental pollution and for providing for remedial measures for such
accidents.
The ULB has to obtain the consent &Authorization of the SPCB to install and operate the facility. The
ULB shall ensure no hazardous waste or bio-medical waste are collected and disposed along the
MSW. It shall communicate to such units to perform as per the concerned rules in consultation with
SPCB.
Ministry of Environment and Forests
(MoEF)
In view of the growing importance of environmental affairs, the GOI set up a Department of
Environment in November 1980 under the portfolio of the Prime Minister. The Department, later
renamed as the MoEF plays a pivotal role in environmental management for sustained development
and for all environmental matters in the country. The major responsibilities of MoEF include:
• Environmental resource conservation and protection, including environmental
impact assessment of developmental projects;
• Co-ordination with the other ministries and agencies, voluntary organizations and
professional bodies on environmental action plans;
• Policy-planning
37
• Promotion of research and development, manpower planning and training and
creation of environmental awareness;
• Liaison & coordination with international agencies involved in environmental
matters. Developmental project
proponents are also required to submit Environmental
Impact Statements/Assessments to establish that preventive measures are
planned by installing adequate pollution control and monitoring equipment, and that
effluent discharged into the environment will not exceed permissible levels. The MoEF
appraises these statements/assessments and approves the project from the environmental
angle. The respective State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) is to give a No Objection
Certificate (NOC).
Central and State Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) is directly responsible for pollution control throughout
the national territory. In addition to the control of air, noise and water pollution it is also
responsible for ensuring effective control on disposal of hazardous wastes and storage and handling
of hazardous chemicals and substances. Additionally, with the enactment of air and water pollution
laws, states have set-up their own Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) to monitor industrial emissions
and effluents and to approve the operation of new industries after careful scrutiny. The functions of
the SPCBs include:
• The planning of comprehensive state programs for the prevention and control of
air and water pollution and to ensure the implementation thereof;
• Inspection of control equipment, industrial plants, etc.;
• Establishing norms in consultation with the Central Board and having regard to
national air quality standards, gaseous emission standards from industrial plants,
automobiles, etc. Different emission standards may be laid down for different
industrial plants, having regard to the quantity and composition of emissions into
the atmosphere from such plants and the general pollution levels in the area;
• Advising the State Government on siting of new polluting industry
38
Prescriptive: Constitutional Guarantees
• Article 48-A of the Constitution: This directive principle states that the State shall
endeavor to protect and improve the natural environment
• Article 51-A of the Constitution: This fundamental duty states that it is the duty of
every citizen to protect and improve the natural environment.
Legislations
Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act 1981: This law addresses the prevention and control of
air pollution.
Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 1989: This law addresses handling of hazardous
substances that fall under specified schedules. Projects envisaged by the proposed Fund may not
require handling of specified substances.
Policies
National Conservation Strategy and Policy Statement on Environment and Development, 1992.
Policy Statement for Abatement of Pollution, 1992
Competent Regulatory Agencies
Pollution Control Boards: In certain cases like “consent to discharge” under pollution laws, the State
Pollution Control Board need to give clearances and approvals.
State/ Central Ministry of Environment and Forests: State/Central MoEF is responsible for issue of
environmental clearances under EIA Notification, 2006. In respect of construction projects, State
Govt. is the authority for issue of environmental clearances.
World Bank/ Other Multilateral Agencies: The World Bank and other Multilateral Agencies would
ensure compliance with their Operational Directives (OD) in case of projects funded by them and
those needs to be complied with.
39
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Rules, 2000 and Compliance Status
Under the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Environment and Forests
number S.O. 783(E), dated, the 27th September, 1999 in the Gazettes of India, Part II, Section 3, sub-
section (B) the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000 shall apply to
every municipal authority responsible for collection, segregation, storage, transportation,
processing and disposal of municipal solid wastes.
Management of MSW
Any MSW generated in a city or a town, shall be managed and handled in accordance with the
compliance criteria and the procedure laid down in Schedule – II [See Rules 6(1) and (3), 7(1)]
Management of Municipal Solid Wastes]. Municipal authorities shall adopt suitable technology or
combination of such technologies to make use of wastes so as to minimize burden on landfill.
Following criteria shall be adopted, namely: -
• The biodegradable wastes shall be processed by composting, vermin-composting,
anaerobic digestion or any other appropriate biological processing for
stabilization of wastes. It shall be ensured that compost or any other end product
shall comply with standards as specified in Schedule –IV;
• Mixed waste containing recoverable resources shall follow the route of recycling.
Incineration with or without energy recovery including pelletisation can also be
used for processing wastes in specific cases. Municipal authority or the operator of
a facility wishing to use other state-of-the- art technologies shall approach the
Central Pollution Control Board to get the standards laid down before applying for
grant of authorization.
The ULB has to comply with the above Rules. The compliance of MSW Rules from primary collection
to disposal stage are analysed and observations are presented in the table below
40
Exhibit 20: Compliance of MSW Rules
S.
No
Parameters
[as per Schedule –
II [see rules 6(1)
and (3), 7(1)] of
MSW (M&H) Rules,2000]
Compliance criteria
[as per Schedule – II [see rules 6(1) and (3),
7(1)] of MSW (M&H) rules,2000]
ULBs’ Compliance
1. Collection of
municipal solid
wastes
Littering of municipal solid waste shall be
prohibited in cities, towns and in urban areas
notified by the State Governments. To prohibit
littering and facilitate compliance, the
following steps shall be taken by the municipal
authority, namely: -
Organizing house-to-house collection of
municipal solid wastes through any of the
methods, like community bin collection
(central bin), house-to-house collection,
collection on regular pre-informed timings and
scheduling by using bell ringing of musical
vehicle (without exceeding permissible noise
levels);
Devising collection of waste from slums and
squatter areas or localities including hotels,
restaurants, office complexes and commercial
areas;
Wastes from slaughter houses, meat and fish
markets, fruits and vegetable markets, which
are biodegradable in nature, shall be managed
to make use of such wastes;
Bio-medical wastes and industrial wastes shall
not be mixed with municipal solid wastes and
such wastes shall follow the rules separately
specified for the purpose;
Collected waste from residential and other
areas shall be transferred to community bin by
hand-driven containerized carts or other small
vehicles;
Door to door
collection is carried
out only in part of the
town.
The waste is dumped
on road side by the
generators and partly
in to road side opens
bins.
Exclusive bio-medical
waste management
system is not
effectively in
Operation.
Construction waste
are collected and
disposed in low lying
areas
Compound wall is put
up for the dump site.
However, access to
stray dogs and
animals in to dump
site is not ruled out.
Bins are open without
lids and littering
cannot be avoided
unless desired bins are
procured and put in
41
S.
No
Parameters
[as per Schedule –
II [see rules 6(1)
and (3), 7(1)] of
MSW (M&H) Rules,2000]
Compliance criteria
[as per Schedule – II [see rules 6(1) and (3),
7(1)] of MSW (M&H) rules,2000]
ULBs’ Compliance
Horticultural and construction or demolition
wastes or debris shall be separately collected
and disposed off following proper norms.
Similarly, wastes generated at dairies shall be
regulated in accordance with the State laws;
Waste (garbage, dry leaves) shall not be burnt;
Stray animals shall not be allowed to move
around waste storage facilities or at any other
place in the city or town and shall be managed
in accordance with the State laws.
The municipal authority shall notify waste
collection schedule and the likely method to be
adopted for public benefit in a city or town.
It shall be the responsibility of generator of
wastes to avoid littering and ensure delivery of
wastes in accordance with the collection and
segregation system to be notified by the
municipal authority as per para 1(2) of this
Schedule.
place.
2. Segregation of
municipal solid
wastes
In order to encourage the citizens, municipal
authority shall organize awareness
programmes for segregation of wastes and
shall promote recycling or reuse of segregated
materials.
The municipal authority shall undertake phased
programme to ensure community participation
in waste segregation. For this purpose, regular
meetings at quarterly intervals shall be
arranged by the municipal authorities with
representatives of local resident welfare
associations and non-governmental
Segregation is not
done at source due to
absence of multiple
bins.
42
S.
No
Parameters
[as per Schedule –
II [see rules 6(1)
and (3), 7(1)] of
MSW (M&H) Rules,2000]
Compliance criteria
[as per Schedule – II [see rules 6(1) and (3),
7(1)] of MSW (M&H) rules,2000]
ULBs’ Compliance
organizations.
3. Storage of municipal
solid wastes
Municipal authorities shall establish and
maintain storage facilities in such a manner, as
they do not create unhygienic and unsanitary
conditions around it. Following criteria shall be
taken into account while establishing and
maintaining storage facilities, namely: -
Provision of waste
bins inadequate
Storage facilities shall be created and
established by taking into account quantities of
waste generation in a given area and the
population densities. A storage facility shall be
so placed that it is accessible to users;
Storage facilities to be set up by municipal
authorities or any other agency shall be so
designed that wastes stored are not exposed to
open atmosphere and shall be aesthetically
acceptable and user-friendly;
Storage facilities or „bins‟ shall have „easy to
operate‟ design for handling, transfer and
transportation of waste. Bins for storage of bio-
degradable wastes shall be painted green, those
for storage of recyclable wastes shall be
printed white and those for storage of other
wastes shall be printed black;
Manual handling of waste shall be prohibited.
If unavoidable due to constraints, manual
handling shall be carried out under proper
precaution with due care for safety of workers.
4. Transportation of
municipal solid
wastes
Vehicles used for transportation of wastes shall
be covered. Waste should not be visible to
public, nor exposed to open environment
preventing their scattering. The following
The waste collection
vehicles are covered.
The ULB has to
deploy dedicated
43
S.
No
Parameters
[as per Schedule –
II [see rules 6(1)
and (3), 7(1)] of
MSW (M&H) Rules,2000]
Compliance criteria
[as per Schedule – II [see rules 6(1) and (3),
7(1)] of MSW (M&H) rules,2000]
ULBs’ Compliance
criteria shall be met, namely:- dumper placer
The storage facilities set up by municipal vehicles to achieve the
authorities shall be daily attended for clearing requirements.
of wastes. The bins or containers wherever
placed shall be emptied before they start
overflowing;
Transportation vehicles shall be so designed
that multiple handling of wastes, prior to final
disposal, is avoided.
5. Processing of
municipal solid
wastes
Municipal authorities shall adopt suitable
technology or combination of such
technologies to make use of wastes to
minimize burden on landfill. Following criteria
shall be adopted, namely:-
The biodegradable wastes shall be processed
by composting, vermin composting, anaerobic
digestion or any other appropriate biological
processing for stabilization of wastes. It shall
be ensured that compost or any other end
product shall comply with standards as
specified in Schedule-IV;
No scientific method
of biodegradable
waste processing/
disposal adopted.
Open dumping is the
prevalent practice.
Mixed waste containing recoverable resources
shall follow the route of recycling. Incineration
with or without energy recovery including
pollicisation can also be used for processing
wastes in specific cases. Municipal authority or
the operator of a facility wishing to use other
state-of-the-art technologies shall approach the
Central Pollution Control Board to get the
standards laid down before applying for grant
of authorization.
6. Disposal of
municipal solid
wastes
Land filling shall be restricted to non-
biodegradable, inert waste and other waste that
are not suitable either for recycling or for
biological processing. Land filling shall also be
No scientific mode of
disposal.
Waste is just dumped
44
S.
No
Parameters
[as per Schedule –
II [see rules 6(1)
and (3), 7(1)] of
MSW (M&H) Rules,2000]
Compliance criteria
[as per Schedule – II [see rules 6(1) and (3),
7(1)] of MSW (M&H) rules,2000]
ULBs’ Compliance
carried out for residues of waste processing
facilities as well as pre-processing rejects from
waste processing facilities. Land filling of
mixed waste shall be avoided unless the same
is found unsuitable for waste processing.
Under unavoidable circumstances or until
installation of alternate facilities, land filling
shall be done following proper norms. Landfill
sites shall meet the specifications as given in
Schedule –III.
in dumping yard.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
Notification, 2006
The notification classifies the Common Municipal Solid Waste Project as falling under Schedule B
which requires Prior Environmental Clearance (EC). The approval has to be obtained from the State
Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) before taking up any construction activity.
The agencies responsibilities and the time frame has been shown in the below table.
45
Exhibit 21: Environmental Clearance - Responsibilities of Agencies
Sl. No.
Agency Responsibilities Time Frame
(in Months)
1 ULB ULB has to appoint the accredited consultant to prepare the EIA report.
1 month
2
EIA Consultant
(i) Obtain the feasibility report/DPR and assist the ULB in seeking Terms of Reference from SEIAA.
1 month
(ii) Conduct the baseline studies for a season as directed by the SEIAA.
4 months
(iii) Prepare the Draft EIA Report and submit for public consultation
3 months
(iv) Assist the client in conducting public consultation document and obtain the minutes
(v) Revise the EIA report according to minutes of the 1 month public consultation and assist the client in seeking the EC
from SEIAA.
3 SEIAA (i)Shall call for presentation and issue/reject environmental clearance.
2 months
4
SPCB
Shall issue the consent to establish on receipt of EC 1 month
Consent to operate on receipt of compliance report from ULB/Operator
NA*
Total Time Frame 13 months
* On completion of installation and satisfying the easy and concerned conditions.
Policy Guidelines
Information and Policy guidelines for MSWM regarding administration, enforcement, waste
processing concession, hospital waste, handling of legal matters are found essential for day-to- day
management.
1) National Policy
2) State Policy
3) MSW Rules Notification
4) Central and State PCB Guidelines
5) World Health Organization Guidelines
46
As per the Constitution of India, MSWM is a state subject and it is the primary responsibility of state
governments to ensure that appropriate solid waste management practices are introduced in all the
cities and towns in the state. The role of GOI is broadly to formulate policy guidelines and provide
technical assistance to the states/cities whenever needed. It also assists the state governments and
local bodies in human resource development and acts as an intermediary in mobilizing external
assistance for implementation of solid waste management projects.
Though MSWM is a State subject, it is basically a municipal function and as such ULBs are directly
responsible for performing this important activity. The 74th amendment of the constitution also
envisages the ULBs to shoulder this responsibility. The ULBs in the country
are, therefore, responsible and required to plan, design, operate, and maintain the MSWM System in
their respective cities/towns.
Though MSWM is an obligatory function of the ULBs, this service has been poorly performed by
most of them resulting in problems of public health, sanitation, and environmental degradation.
With rapid pace of urbanization, the situation is becoming more and more critical day-by-day.
Infrastructure development is not in a position to keep pace with population growth owing to poor
financial health of most of the urban local bodies. Lack of financial resources, institutional weakness,
improper choice of technology, lack of public participation in solid waste management, non-
involvement of private sector, etc., have made the service far from satisfactory. There is, therefore, a
need to handle this problem in a concerted manner and adopt strategies to tackle all aspects of
waste management scientifically involving private sector wherever necessary and possible. A policy
framework is, therefore, necessary to guide and support the ULBs in the country for managing the
solid waste scientifically and cost effectively.
Recommendations based on 12th and 13th
Finance Commission Report
12th and 13th Finance Commission endorses additional funds for community development projects.
For the newly formed States, Chhattisgarh is one of the newly formed State starving for funds to
enhance the basic requirements such as roads, water supply, street lights, slum development etc.
The ULB has to comply as per the Honourable Supreme Court of India direction in implementing the
47
MSW Rules. 12th &13th Finance Commission provides allotment to enhance the quality of
environment and basic infra-structure requirements. The Government of Chhattisgarh shall demand
additional funds from Government of India for the implementation MSWM Projects in addition to
grant extended from CPHEEO, Department of Urban Affairs.
Revenue generated through property tax, which is the main source of revenue for ULBs in the state
is found to be negligible compared to expenses. The ULB has to spend a large amount on
the garbage management in the form of salaries and consumables. Due to the inadequate
infrastructure development, the ULBs are not able to recover the property tax as desired.
In view of the above, the Finance Commission may extend more funds for the development of
infrastructure facilities for MSWM similar to other infrastructure facilities like roads and water
supply to ensure better environmental and health status exclusively for the newly formed states for
sustainable developments.
48
PROPOSED MSWM SYSTEM
Population Projection
Population projection is one of the important aspects of planning or designing any urban
infrastructure. There are several methods by which population projections can be done. Some
methods are ad-hoc method while some are iterative methods. The various factors affecting
population projection are:
• Birth rates, death rates and migration trends
• Plans and Policies of the Government
• Infrastructure facilities such as housing, water supply, roads
• Employment providing potential
• Natural as well as man- made hazards
Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development has published a Manual on Municipal Solid
Waste Management which documents methods of population projection that are widely used in
planning of solid waste management. Following methods have been outlined in the manual.
• Arithmetic Progression Method
• Geometric Progression Method
• Varying Increment Method
5.1.1 Design Population
Population in the TCMC without any omission will be considered for design of the project.
Population growth trend can be better understood by studying the available Census population
data in the Past. Population of TCMC for the period 1921 to 2011 is given in following exhibit.
49
Exhibit 22: Population Details
Year
Population
Increment /
Decade [X]
Incremental
Increase [Y]
% Increment /
Decade [Z]
1921 59,913 -- -- --
1931 66,889 6,976 1.12 --
1941 68,702 1,813 1.03 -5,163
1951 100,680 31,978 1.47 30,165
1961 111,099 10,419 1.10 -21,559
1971 140,547 29,448 1.27 19,029
1981 184,015 43,468 1.31 14,020
1991 202,013 17,998 1.10 -25,470
2001 215,725 13,712 1.07 -4,286
2011 222,943 7,218 1.03 -6,494
Mean (decadal) 18,114 1.16 30
Mean (annual) 1,811 1.01 0.30
Source: Collected from TCMC and Census data
Exhibit 23: Population Projection
Year
Population as
per census
Projected Population Population
considered
(Avg. of AP,
GP& II)
Arithmetic
Progression
method
Geometric
Progression
method
Incremental
Increase
method
1971 140,547
1981 184,015
1991 202,013
2001 215,725
2011 222,943
50
2014 228,377 232,925 228,379 229,894
2016 232,000 239,827 232,005 234,611
2021 241,057 257,989 241,074 246,707
2026 250,115 277,527 250,151 259,264
2031 259,172 298,545 259,235 272,317
2036 268,229 321,155 268,327 285,904
2041 277,286 345,476 277,427 300,063
2046 286,344 371,640 286,534 314,839
Waste Projection
As waste generation is a factor of population, lifestyles and level of urbanization, the quantification
process has been linked with population multiplied by the waste generation factor of the urban
area. The factor of waste generation in turn has been calculated by monitoring „total waste
generation‟ to the population of the city at a given time (total waste generation/ population). A
factor of 0.526 kg/capita/day has been considered for TCMC based on survey.
Exhibit 24: Waste Quantification for various years (2014-2040)
S. No. Year Population Total Waste Generation for
(TPD)
1 2014 228,377 121.92
2 2016 232,000 126.63
3 2021 241,057 142.05
4 2026 250,115 159.24
5 2031 259,172 178.41
6 2036 268,229 199.81
7 2041 277,286 223.69
8 2046 286,344 250.37
51
Proposed Primary Collection System
Modus operandi
The modus operandi for primary collection of waste should be based on following:
• Minimize manual handling of waste and gradually eliminate manual handling.
• Waste from market areas, hotels, restaurants area, institutional areas, commercial
complexes should be lifted every day and transported more frequently.
Primary Collection of wastes from society / complexes
There are very few private societies/ complexes and multi storied buildings in the TCMC. The
municipality should make it mandatory for associations of these societies and complexes to have
their own sweepers and maintain community bins in their premises. They should be advised to
store their organic (wet) and inorganic (dry) waste separately. While selecting the placement
location of such bins the society bearer should consult with municipality sanitary staff to ensure
that the bin or container is easily accessible and convenient to empty.
The resident welfare associations of societies or residential complexes may ask to deliver their
waste to the waste collector designated by the municipality only. The municipality should identify
such societies and direct them to engage private contractors.
Collection of wastes from Slums
There are about 66 slum areas spread all over TCMC. In case of slum areas, it is not possible to have
door-to-door collection. However, the slum dwellers should be advised to store their waste in
plastic bag or small containers. The bio-degradable plastic bags are available and the municipality
can supply these plastic bags to slum dwellers for storage of their waste. The waste may be
collected from slums using bell-mounted tri-cycle. The sweeper will travel across the main lanes of
the slum area and invite residents to deposit their waste in the bins placed in tri- cycle.
52
Wherever, it is not feasible to collect waste by tri-cycle due to non-availability of access roads and
very high level of congestion, the community may be asked to deliver their waste to the waste
collector designated by the municipality. The municipality may even engage a private contractor for
collection of such waste. Performance certification by a “Slum (local level) Committee” may be
insisted upon in such cases.
As present waste management conditions are not satisfactory in slum pockets, it is recommended
that implementation of waste management system should be started from slum areas.
Collection of segregated, recyclable/ non-biodegradable wastes from household
Recyclable and segregated non-biodegradable wastes, which are inert in nature, should not be
reaching waste processing and disposal facility. Therefore, there is no point in making efforts in
collection of this waste by TCMC.
In fact, municipality should recognize traders and waste recyclers and notify their details to the
general public. There are traders/recyclers already available in the TCMC. They collect recyclable
wastes from municipality.
Collection of waste from shops & establishments
For collection of recyclable waste from shops and establishments, waste collectors (rag pickers)
may be organized. Working arrangements should be made such that it is suitable to shops and
establishment. It is preferable, if the waste is collected in the evening by the waste collectors as by
evening the shop keepers might have collected waste, which they would not like to store through
night.
In case, the shops and restaurants are producing wet and dry wastes, they should be asked to store
waste in two separate bins. The recyclable waste can be collected by the waste collector and wet
waste can be collected by the sweeper once in a day. The material received by the waste collectors
directly from shops and establishments would give them a better return. The waste
53
would be dry and not soiled and would fetch a good price in the market. This will work as an
incentive for them to continue door to door collection.
As an alternative, the associations of shops and restaurants should be persuaded to organise
privatized waste collection and waste collectors in their market.
Collection of Bio medical waste
The Bio-medical Waste (Management& Handling) Rules, 1998 have been notified by the Ministry of
Environment & Forest, which prescribe methods for handling, storage, collection and treatment of
bio-medical wastes. As per the Rules, the hospital occupier is entirely responsible for waste
handling and the municipality is required to lift only non-biomedical (general) waste and treated
bio-medical waste from hospital premises. These wastes may be transferred to the waste
processing and disposal site.
Presently, the IMA is collecting the bio-medical waste and burying the same at the identified
dumping site. It is recommended to identify a site and develop into a comprehensive facility for
treatment and disposal of bio-medical wastes of TCMC and nearby towns.
Collection of hotels and restaurants waste
The TCMC should impress upon the association of hotels and restaurants to organize primary
storage and collection of wastes themselves. They should collect dry and wet wastes separately and
make their own arrangements for storage and develop system for primary collection of wastes.
They can implement this either by contracting private agency working in the area of waste
management.
In case municipality is required to help for primary collection, help may be extended on full- cost-
recovery basis by the municipality. Charges for the collection of hotel waste may be decided
depending upon the quantity and type (dry/wet) of waste to be picked up from the hotels and
restaurants and frequency of collection. It is very much apparent that once municipality starts
imposing charges, the association of hotels may prefer to have their own arrangements, as
54
discussed with some hoteliers in TCMC. However, it is recommended that cost recovery system
should be discussed with the associations of hotels and restaurants and it should be decided
mutually by arriving at general agreement.
Collection of vegetable & fruits, meat and fish markets
The primary collection of waste from vegetable, fruit, meat & fish market is totally privatized and
the waste is collected daily. Municipality should continue to ensure that the contractor collects the
wastes regularly.
Collection of garden wastes
Based on the size of garden and waste generation rate, frequency of collection of waste may be
worked out. It may be once or twice in a week. The frequency so worked out may be intimated to
the park authorities so that they can carry out work of pruning of trees and mowing of grass
accordingly. The community should inform the municipality officials for the work. However, the
wastes generated by the visitors like plastic cups, plates and other eatables may be collected on
daily basis. The garden authorities should be advised to store then separately in adequate size of
environment friendly waste containers depending upon the waste generation rate.
Collection of Wastes from marriage halls / community halls
At the marriage halls and community halls, wastes are generated occasionally and therefore they
require special arrangements for collection of waste. On every such occasion, the management of
marriage hall or community hall should pre-inform the municipality for collection of waste. The
cost of such collection could be built into the charges for utilizing such halls by the management of
these marriage and community halls. This service may be provided preferably through a contractor
or departmentally as the local bodies deem fit.
Collection of construction & demolition wastes
Construction and demolition debris does not require any processing and sanitary landfill disposal,
if they are inert in nature. However, dumping of this waste on the road side causes
55
public nuisance and blocks the road. The construction site owner should be made fully responsible
for the wastes generated by them at the site. Therefore, the construction site owner should give
undertaking to manage these wastes before starting any construction activity.
The TCMC should recover the cost, in case, it is required to take care of the wastes. Keeping this in
view, they should work out charges per tonne of construction and demolition waste towards
providing services for collection, transportation and disposal. The construction site owner should
be asked to deposit requisite advance amount to the municipality as per the prescribed rates. This
process may be inbuilt with permission seeking process for construction by the municipality.
The charges for collection, transportation and disposal of wastes should include penalty charges
also, in case the construction site owner fails to obtain necessary permission and does not deposit
advance amount.
The collection, transportation and disposal of wastes may be carried out using mini-trucks, tractors
and manpower.
In order to take care of wastes from minor civil works like repair or small construction works and
to facilitate disposal of small quantities of construction/demolition waste, containers/tractor
trailers may be placed in various parts of the city where waste producers may deposit small
quantities through private laborer, hand carts, tri-cycles etc. and such waste may be collected from
time to time before such containers/tractor trolleys start over flowing.
Dairy & cattle shed waste
Those dairies, cattle breeders and poultries having sheds within the city limits should be instructed
to take care of the wastes generated by them. They should be educated and advised to transfer the
waste produced by them daily into the TCMC bins. In case, they fail to do so, penalty charges may
be imposed on them depending upon the quantity of waste generated and they may be asked to
shift outside the city. They should not be allowed to stack the cow dung, grass or other stable
wastes within their premises or on the roadside.
56
Sweeping of street & public spaces
In order to prepare sweeping plan, the streets and public spaces should be classified as residential
streets, market areas, open spaces, streets having no residential areas or having more density of
habitation.
The TCMC should publish notification inviting general public to complain and bring it to the notice
of municipality in case their area is not cleared.
Substitution of sanitation workers
Sanitary services should not suffer due to absence of any sanitation worker. In order to assure this,
alternate arrangements must be made to ensure that all sanitary services are provided even when
any sanitary worker is on leave or absent.
Prevent burning of waste by sweepers and the public
Burning of waste causes hazardous/toxic gaseous pollutants and must be avoided. TCMC has
already banned open burning of waste. Occasional erring rag-pickers should be discouraged by
taking punitive measures to prevent open burning.
Tools to be given to sweepers
Adequate number and types of tools should be given to sweepers to execute efficient sweeping and
waste collection.
The tools may include long handled brooms, metal tray and metal plates etc.
Tricycles / Handcart
The available number of tri-cycles is not sufficient and required number has been assessed sanitary
division wise and indicated in division-wise management plan.
Norms of works
Clear cut and specific work norms need to be devised for sanitary workers, sweepers, sanitary
supervisors, sanitary inspectors and sanitary officers who are directly involved in SWM services.
The work norms can be devised depending upon local conditions. It is advisable to start the work
57
as early as possible in the morning so as to avoid interference with routine activities of the
residents.
The work norms should be such that they are applicable to individuals so as to allow measurement
of their work performance. The work norms for group of sanitary workers are never successful.
The work norms may also be in compliance with government policy and court orders.
Cleaning the slums
There are 66 slum clusters in the TCMC. It is not feasible to clean slums on daily basis. Also during
the visit to these slum areas, it was observed that slum residents were having complaints regarding
sanitary services in the slum.
In view of above, it is recommended that TCMC should pay special attention to lifting of garbage
from slum community bins and also associate slum residents in it‟s services. This will ensure
regular cleaning of slum areas.
Cleaning of surface drains
Cleaning of sewage drains is critical issue in TCMC. The TCMC has got sanitary workers specially for
cleaning drains. While preparing the work norms for sanitary workers, the length of drain to be
cleaned should also be fixed. The length of drain to be cleaned may vary based on the size of drain.
However, to start with 500 to 1000 meters of length for drain cleaning may be fixed on daily basis
depending upon size of drain. This does not mean that sanitary worker is required to clean every
bit of length allocated to him. Instead, he will walk along the drain and see for himself chocking etc
and clean it.
The sanitary workers involved in drain cleaning may be given tools like seamless handcarts and
shovels. It is also recommended to maintain separate roster for cleaning of drains.
58
Alternatives that can be considered
The town has already done away with the public dust bins system which is being managed very
efficiently. However, in order to meet any contingency or exigency, the mobile squad should be
strengthened to collect the incidental waste generation in the city.
Use of small vehicles for direct collection
The usage of auto-rikshaw for direct collection of waste from the city during day time is being
practiced presently, which may be continued. It is recommended that such system should be more
focused on the high waste generation areas like bus stand, commercial places etc.
Need of containers for hazardous domestic wastes
In order to store domestic hazardous wastes, separate special containers may be used. The
generators of such wastes may be asked to store hazardous wastes separately and deposit in
special containers meant for hazardous wastes in consultation with the municipality. The domestic
hazardous wastes may be disposed off in separate cells in sanitary landfill facilities. Such cells
should be necessarily lined with HDPE liners.
To improvise the present situation of primary collection system and inadequate tools and
equipments, the following list of requirements are essential given in exhibit. Annexure 4 provides
the list of primary collection equipment requirements given in divisional wise.
59
Exhibit 25: Requirement of Primary Collection Equipments
S. No. Particulars Capacity in
MT
Requirement in
Nos. Application
1 Tricycles 0.10 130 Residential
2
Compactor Bins
0.45
144
Residential - 80 Nos.,
Commercial - 30 Nos.,
Market Area-20 Nos.,
Hotel, Restaurants and
Marriage halls -10 Nos.,
Slaughter House - 4 Nos.
Proposed Secondary Collection and
Transportation System
In TCMC, the transportation of waste is only from the waste collection point to the waste processing
and disposal site. Following points need to be noted for transportation of wastes:
• There is no direct transportation of wastes from any other place than waste
collection points except for construction and demolition waste.
• The wastes from domestic, trade and institutional sources have to be shifted to the
waste collection points using push carts.
• There should not be any littering of solid wastes during the transportation.
• The transportation route should not be zig-zag as far as possible.
Routing of vehicle
The routing of transportation vehicles in TCMC is good, as can be observed from the routing and
time chart. There are not many alternatives for routing.
60
Type of vehicles to be used
A combination of vehicles ranging from push carts, tricycle, mini tipper lorries, tipper lorries and
compactors are used for transportation of wastes.
The waste has to be kept covered during the transportation to avoid littering on the road.
Bio medical wastes from hospitals, nursing homes, health care establishments
In order to transport bio-medical wastes, instructions contained in the Bio-medical Waste
(Management & Handling) Rules, 1998 should be followed. The waste should be transported in
secured manner in containers. The containers should be lined with stainless steel or aluminum.
In TCMC, the quantity of bio-medical wastes for transportation is small i.e. 180 kg per day (1.79 %)
and therefore one cubic meter container mounted on three wheeled chassis and fitted with tipping
arrangement should be used.
The bio-medical wastes should be transported to separate facility meant for treatment of bio-
medical wastes.
Transportation of wastes from hotels and restaurants
As recommended, the wastes from hotels and restaurants should be collected in bins.
The TCMC should lift wastes from these bins twice daily. The wastes may be transferred using
TATA Ace. The system of waste lifting from hotel and restaurants may be privatized on cost
recovery basis for the hotels and restaurants. This would ensure efficient waste collection and
transportation.
Transportation of wastes of construction and debris
Transportation of construction wastes and debris has to be done directly by mini tipper lorries
from the source of generation to point of disposal. These wastes should not be stored on the road
side, otherwise it will create public nuisance.
61
Transportation of wastes from narrow lanes
The present practice of transportation of wastes from narrow lanes using push carts/tricycles
should be continued. As the lanes are quite narrow, it is not possible to use other vehicles in TCMC.
Workshop facility for vehicle maintenance
Presently, the workshop facilities are availed from outside based on contractual arrangement and
the same may be continued as discussed with the TCMC. However, the contractual arrangement
needs to be better organised for obtaining efficient and cost effective services. The selected and
interested sanitary workers should also be trained to carry out minor repairs in push carts, wheel
barrows, mini tipper lorries or tools used by them. The contractual arrangement of workshop
should be closely monitored by the MHO/ Engineer or Commissioner.
To improvise the present situation of secondary collection and transportation system and
inadequate vehicles, the following list of vehicles are essential given in exhibit. Annexure 5 provides
the list of secondary collection and transportation vehicles requirements given in TCMC.
Exhibit 26: Requirement of Secondary Collection and Transportation Vehicles
S. No. Particulars Requirement
in Nos.
Capacity in
MT No of Trips
Quantity in
MTPD*
1 Tata Ace 5 1 2 18
2 Tipper Lorry 2 6 2 7.5
3 Compactor 3 8 3 54
* Practically, can accommodate 75% of waste in vehicles
Proposed Processing Facility – Composting Technologies
MSW Rules 2000 requires that biodegradable wastes be processed by composting, vermi-
composting, anaerobic digestion or any other appropriate biological processing for the stabilization
of wastes. Composting is the best available method for processing the biodegradable waste as the
end products are usable for agriculture gardening and forestry.
62
Composting is a method of converting biodegradable waste into manure. Decomposition is a natural
process if controlled this process will result in formation of manure from waste. The manure
obtained can be used for the fortification of soil and optimizing its nutrient contents. The manure
can be used along with the fertilizers.
Composting can be carried out in two ways aerobically and an-aerobically. During aerobic
composting aerobic micro-organisms oxidize organic compounds to Carbon-di-oxide, Nitrite and
Nitrate. Carbon from organic compounds is used as a source of energy while nitrogen is recycled.
Due to exothermic reaction, temperature of the mass rises.
The aerobic method uses aerobic bacteria to work under suitable environment, i.e. moisture,
temperature, oxygen content and carbon/ nitrogen ratio of organic matter. This method normally
produces good quality compost containing nitrogen and sulphate, and does not cause the odour
problem. The finished compost can be used as an offset for fertilizers in the agriculture industry and
other related uses such as landscaping, green cover development, barren land reclamation etc.
During anaerobic process, microorganisms, while metabolizing the nutrients, break down the
organic compounds through a process of reduction and is operated under anaerobic environment,
and normally causes odour problems, such as, hydrogen sulphide and ammonia. A very small
amount of energy is released during the process and the temperature of composting mass does not
raise much. The gases evolved are mainly methane and carbon-di-oxide. An anaerobic process is a
reduction process and the final product is subjected to some minor oxidation when applied to land.
This method uses longer time for acquiring mature to digest and gives lower quality of fertilizer.
Windrow method of composting is suitable aerobic composting process as it can accommodate
large volumes of diverse waste streams. Anything from garden waste, liquids, grease, animal by-
products (poultry, dairy waste) and municipal decomposable waste can be treated by windrows.
This method has resulted in high efficiency for MSW.
Technology Selection
As per the analysis of alternative technologies for waste processing and disposal as outlined and
considering pertinent factors such as regional setting, climatic conditions i.e. fairly long spell of dry
condition (8-9 months in a year), land availability and quantum of biodegradable waste generated,
aerobic composting was selected as the feasible option.
63
Alternatives such as vermi-composting and in-vessel composting are feasible only at a smaller scale
of operation for non-hazardous organic waste and are therefore not recommended for
implementation.
It is proposed to treat the biodegradable portion of the MSW biologically using aerobic windrow
composting while the recyclables shall be recovered and all inert material shall be sent to the
sanitary landfill.
Aerobic Composting Process
Composting is the biological degradation of organic materials under controlled aerobic conditions.
The process is used to stabilize organic bio-solids (a term used to describe organic biodegradable
matter derived from domestic waste) prior to their use as a soil amendment or mulch in
landscaping, horticulture, and agriculture. The final product of this treatment process is called
„fertilizer grade compost‟.
Composting of the waste in the formed windrows can be achieved in a period of approximately 6 to
8 weeks under controlled climatic and process conditions. The formed windrows require turning at
a specified frequency to ensure that the inner sections or core of the windrows do not turn
anaerobic which can actually be detrimental to the process. The machinery used to turn the
windrows shall be standard front-end loaders or specialized compost turners. Compost turners
generally are faster and do a better job of mixing than front-end loaders. Front-end loaders are less
expensive to purchase, and can also be used for unloading incoming waste and loading finished
product. Alternative method of turning includes drilling air holes, installing aeration pipes and
forcing airflow through the piles. Design of the proposed composting facility shall be performed
considering the following design criteria:
• Carbon : Nitrogen Value
• Oxygen availability &aeration
• Nutrient balance
• Particle size
• pH value
64
• Temperature
• Moisture control
The finished product is then extracted from the final pile, sieved to remove alien material and
prepared for packaging and distribution/ marketing.
Desirability of bagging equipment depends on the market (end-users) for the finished product. A
high-quality product suitable for home gardens is likely to be distributed or sold in small quantities,
and equipment for bagging the product may be necessary. However, a lower quality product used as
a soil amendment for the agriculture and landscaping sectors typically might be distributed in large
quantities (i.e., truckload), and bagging equipment may not be required. The figure above is a
representation of a typical windrow composting system.
Process Description – Aerobic Composting The incoming waste is received at the tipping floor. The tipping floor supervisor monitors the waste
for any non-conforming waste such as “hazardous waste”, “biomedical waste”, incinerable waste,
etc as prescribed in the MSW Rules, 2000. Foreign material that is unacceptable will be removed
and disposed in the sanitary landfill that is also proposed. Recyclable material, if any, shall be
recovered at this stage. The 100 mm trommel screening shall be performed through suitable
equipment suah as mechanical screeners. Bio-degradable waste prior to entering the windrow
platform shall also be shredded and ground to uniform size (10 – 15 mm dia. particle size).
The prepared waste shall be delivered to the windrow platform using suitable material handling
equipment. Windrows which are essentially semi-circular formations of the waste assay in the
specified dimension shall be prepared as shown. The constructed windrow pile should be formed as
a semi-circular cross-section allowing requisite interstitial clearance between each pile. This
clearance should be maintained for ease of access of equipment to the windrows. Once windrows
are initially formed and settled, a windrow will be turned used to aerate the piles. The turning may
be done for every 3 days initially and thereafter, based on monitoring results it may be turned
approximately once in a week.
65
Exhibit 27: Process Flow Diagram for 200 TPD Compost Processing Plant
66
The turning operations will not only aerate the pile but will also increase the surface area available
to microbes and accelerating the composting process. A reduction in pile size will also occur as a
result of initial turnings. The individual sections will be monitored to ensure a proper environment
for active composting to be maintained. Temperature, being the prime indicator of microbial
activity, should be monitored daily along the windrow using long stem digital thermometers. The
windrow or section of windrow will also be turned if the temperature varies from the thermophilic
range (45 °C - 60°C).
The optimum moisture content for composting is between 50-60%. Hence addition of moisture may
be necessitated if the moisture content of the incoming waste is low. Further during composting the
moisture content tends to reduce and necessary moisture can be similarly added during turning.
The moisture content will be checked periodically using the “squeeze test” (A handful of material
from within the windrow will be squeezed; if a few drops of water are generated the windrow can
be assumed to contain the proper range of moisture 40% to 60 %). Deviance from this range
requires turning of the windrow. On the other hand if there is more water than few drops, turning is
done to aerate and dry pile to prevent anaerobic conditions. The water requirement will be taken
from the runoff collection tank or by way of bore-well.
Eventually, through turning and mixing the windrow will be homogenized and will uniformly
degrade. Composting and curing will be judged complete when pile temperatures decrease to near
ambient and is moderate for 14 days.
On the 21st day, the formed windrow is broken down and passed through a dual trommel of 35 mm
and 14 mm mesh to remove oversize particles. The screened material is allowed to dry to remove
the moisture content and then fed into the 4 mm trommel. The +4 mm will be removed and kept
aside for disposal while -4mm which is the finished compost will be stored separately. The
recyclable fraction and plastic waste should be properly segregated and sold or given for recycling.
Only the compost rejects and inert waste should go to the landfill site.
67
Maintenance of the sediment basin (catch basin for storm water runoff) will prevent potential
ground and surface water problems. The catch basin will act as a reservoir for sediment and
rainwater runoff. Water in the basin can be used to supplement the moisture requirements of the
windrows. The catch basin should be monitored and if required sprayed for insect and vector
control. It is decided to have a windrow composting with the composting period of 45 days.
Exhibit 28: List of Machinery & Equipment Requirement
S. No. Equipment’s Qty Comments
1 Presorting section of 20 TPH capacity
I Feeder 1 No. For feeding material at controlled rate.
II Feed Conveyor 1 No. For conveying material to Screening.
II Trommel (Ø 100mm) 1 No. For screening.
III Accepts Conveyor 1 No. For conveying material to dumper.
IV Rejection conveyor 1 No. For removal of rejection and transfer it to
sorting belt.
V Reversible conveyor 1 No. For continuous plant operation .
2 Preparatory section of 10 TPH capacity
I Feeding conveyor 1 No. For feeding material to Trommel.
II Trommel - 35mm 1 No. For screening.
III Accepts - 35 Conveyor 1 No. For feeding material to next Trommel.
IV Reject - 35 Conveyor 1 No. For removal of rejection off-line.
V Trommel - 14mm 1 No. For screening.
VI Accepts – 14 Conveyor 1 No. For transfer of material to curing area.
VII Reject - 14 Conveyor 1 No. For removal of rejection off-line.
VIII Magnetic Separator 1 No. For removing ferrous metals.
3 Finishing section 5 – 7.5 TPH capacity
I Feeding Conveyor 1 No. For feeding material to Trommel..
II Trommel - 4mm 1 No. For screening.
68
S. No. Equipment’s Qty Comments
III Accepts - 4 Conveyor 1 No. For feeding material
IV Reject - 4 Conveyor 1 No. For removal of rejection off-line.
V Rejects stone conveyor 1 No. For removal of rejection off-line.
VI Destoner with dust
collection system
1 No. For separation of stone and removal of
impurities
VII Compost Conveyor 1 No. For final outcome material
VIII Reversible conveyor 1 No. For continuous plant operation .
IX Magnetic Separator 1 No. For removing ferrous metals.
4 Control Panel
I Electrical Control Panel 3 set Provide separately to each section
II
Connected Load
3 set
Presorting section: 60 HP, 3 Phase, 440 V
Preparatory section: 70 HP, 3 Phase, 440 V
Finishing section: 60 HP, 3 Phase, 440 V
Process Monitoring and Control
As a dynamic process, compost piles should be monitored to assess the need for turning and
moisture control. Monitoring and turning records have to be maintained to show that an approved
turning schedule was followed. Specific compost monitoring parameters include:
Moisture: The ingredients of a pile with adequate moisture will have the feel of a damp (but not
dripping wet) sponge. Excessive moisture conditions will be characterized by a saturated texture
and unpleasant odours inside the pile and leachate around its base. Corrective actions for excess
moisture include covering the pile with a tarp or specialized compost cover during wet weather
and/or turning the pile during dry weather to increase evaporation.
Temperature: Ideally, temperature should be measured with a digital or a dial-type (non- mercury)
compost thermometer with at least 40 cm long stem. Sustained temperatures of 50 to 60° C in the
pile interior are an indication of optimum decomposition and pathogen reduction. On the other
hand, temperatures above 70°C may indicate insufficient moisture. A compost pile
69
whose temperature never goes above 40°C may not have enough oxygen due to settling, may be too
wet, or conversely, too dry.
Odour and Physical Appearance: A well-managed active compost pile will shrink in height
quickly, and will have a slightly sweet, fermented aroma when opened. Conversely, a poorly
managed pile will not decrease substantially in height, may emit an unpleasant odour, and will likely
have weeds sprouting from its surface.
Advantages & Limitations
Composting of MSW is currently the most important biological route for recycling matter and
nutrients from the organic fraction of MSW. Full scale composting technology for (i) source
separated MSW and (ii) mechanically separated MSW (iii) mixed MSW is already commercially
available and in use, and its further application is limited by only by process economics and the
availability for markets for the composted MSW which include applications like use as manure, soil
conditioners for parks, gardens, agricultural lands, landfill cover, etc., depending uponnits
compostion / quality.
Advantages / Opportunities:
• Age old established concept for recycling of matter / nutrients to soil
• Simple and straight forward for adoption for source separated MSW
• Does not require large capital investment, compared to other waste treatment options
• Suitable for organic bio-degradable fraction of MSW, yard (or garden) waste /
waste containing high proportion of lignocellulosces materials, which do not
readily degrade under anaerobic conditions, waste from slaughterhouse and
diary waste
Limitations / Barriers
• Suitable for only organic biodegradable fraction of MSW, not very suitable for
wastes which may be too wet.
• Problems relating to the complexity of the raw waste, which need to be addressed.
70
• Emissions of environmental concern from open compost plants if not managed
properly.
• Operations get hampered during heavy rains for a few days at the open compost plants.
• Open compost plants if not managed well could emit bad odour and create fly menace.
• Risk of production of contaminated compost from MSW if entry of biomedical
waste, hazardous industrial waste and other toxic material is not restricted at the
compost plant site.
• The requirement of land is relatively more for open compost plants.
• In case of vermi-composting source segregation of organic biodegradable waste is
essential. Worms are likely to die if any toxic material enters the stream of
compostable matter. This also requires more land than microbial composting.
The quality of compost produced from source segregated organic waste is generally better than
that of compost produced from mechanically separated MSW and of that produced from mixed
MSW (without any separation). Grinding of MSW should be avoided as it can mask the presence of
hazardous material and make it impossible for their removal after the composting is done. In the
absence of wase segregation at source, there is possibility of the produced compost being
contaminated by heavy metals and toxic / hazardous substances etc. It is critical that compost so
produced be environmentally safe and if the compost is marketed for agriculture, it is ensured
through proper testing and certification that it is free from heavy metals, toxic materials, sharp
objects, glass, etc.
Design & Area Requirment
Design of the subject facility has been performed in accordance with the CPHEEO Manual and MSW
Rules 2000. Design calculation of the proposed facility is calculated in the below exhibit.
71
Exhibit 29: Area Requirement for Composting Facility
Assumption
Design Year 2021
Projected Waste TPD 130.00
Ultimate design adjustment 80%
Design Tonnage 104.00
Sq. M / Acre 4046.86
Density of waste T/m3 0.5
Daily Volume (Max. material) m3/day 208.00
Composting Period days 45.00
Height m 2.00
Base Width m 3.00
Top Width m 1.00
Number of Rows required (incl 1 as buffer) Nos 46.00
No of windrows in a column Nos 7.00
No of columns Nos 7.00
Minimum Clearance between Pads m 2.00
Free-board at pad-ends (4 m ea. side) m 4.00
Volume of waste m3/day 208.00
Length of windrow m 52.00
Length of windrow pad m 384.00
Width of windrow pad m 41.00
Windrow pad area m2 15744
Processing Shed area m2 360
Drain m2 233
Required area for processing facility m2 16337
Required area for processing facility acre 4.04
72
Proposed Disposal Facility – Sanitary
Landfill
MSW if dumped in open pollutes all environmental components. Waste pollutes air through gases,
dust, litter and bad odour. Water passing through the waste results in leachate with high COD,
heavy metals and salts content. Leachate generated contaminate ground water, runoff from
disposed waste will result in contamination of surface water. The disposed waste has aesthetic
negative impact on the surroundings.
The term „landfill‟ is used to describe a unit operation for final disposal of „MSW on land, designed
and constructed with the objective of minimum impact to the environment by incorporating eight
essential components as described by CPHEEO Manual, 2000. This term encompasses other terms
such as „secured landfill‟ and „engineered landfills‟ which are also sometimes applied to MSW
disposal units. The term „landfill‟ can be treated as synonymous to
„sanitary landfill‟ of MSW, only if the latter is designed on the principle of waste containment and is
characterized by the presence of a liner and leachate collection system to prevent ground water
contamination.
(a) Land filling will be done for the following types of waste:
(i) Comingled waste (mixed waste) not found suitable for waste processing;
(ii) Pre-processing and post-processing rejects from waste processing sites;
(iii) Non-hazardous waste not being processed or recycled.
(b) Land filling will usually not be done for the following waste streams in the MSW :
(i) Bio waste/garden waste;
(ii) Dry recyclables.
(c) Land filling of hazardous waste stream in the municipal waste will be done at a
hazardous waste landfill site; such a site will be identified by the State Government
and is likely to be operated by industries of a district/state. If such a landfill is not
available, municipal authorities will dispose the hazardous waste in a special
hazardous waste cell in the MSW landfill.
(d) Land filling of construction and demolition waste will be done in a separate landfill
where the waste can be stored and mined for future use in earthwork or road
projects. If such a landfill site is not available, the waste will be stored in a special cell
73
at a MSW landfill from where it can be mined for future use. Construction and
demolition waste can be used as a daily cover at MSW landfills; however only
minimum thickness of cover should be provided.
The essential components of landfill are:
(1) A liner system to protect leakage of liquids and gases to soil
(2) A leachate collection and control system for collection and extraction of leachate
from the landfill base
(3) A gas collection and treatment system for collecting gas from the top and its
utilization for energy recovery
(4) A final Cover to enhance water drainage and to support vegetation
(5) Environmental Monitoring System which periodically collects and analyse
samples from air, water, soil- gas and groundwater around the landfill site
(6) A closure and post closure plan listing measures to close and secure the landfill site
Landfill Design Requirements and Standards
(a) Earth Works
The design of the layout is made in such a way that all planed areas have sufficient inclination to
guarantee an unhindered run off of leachate and storm water. The design of the landfill has to be
prepared in such a manner, that the amount of cut and fills are finally in a balance. Required
cover material need to be considered and has to be made available. Filling and compacting must
be carried out in layers of up to 40 cm maximum.
(b) Base Sealing System
Basic Elements
The sealing system has to fulfil the guidelines and technical requirements as defined in the EIA and
in the MSW Rules, 2000.
Mineral Sealing Layer
The mineral sealing layer of 900mm depth will be installed in four layers of at least 225 mm
thickness each. A suitable binding material (suitable combination of coarse and fine particles)
should be used. This material must be installed during favourable weather conditions. The
74
following qualities are required:
• at least 10 mass-% of clay particles with a high adsorptive capacity,
• maximum 5 mass-% of organic substances and
• maximum 15 mass-% of carbonate.
A permeability of the mineral sealing layer of kf ≤ 1 x 10-9 m/s has to be ensured. For the material
and its installation the following requirements must be considered:
• homogenous material that has a homogenous water content and homogenous
incorporation of the material,
• proctor density (DPR) of each layer of DPR ≥ 95 %, and
• water content (w) must be higher than the proctor water content (WPR).
HDPE Geo-Membrane
The second sealing liner will be a High-density polyethylene (HDPE) geo-membrane with a
minimum thickness of 2.0 mm. The geo-membrane can only be installed during favourable weather
conditions. For the constructing of the layer the following items have to be considered:
a) Welding of the HDPE layer is only possible if the sun does not shine directly on
the HDPE layer in summer time (danger of blistering),
b) Water is not allowed on the landfill base of the HDPE layer,
c) Before work starts the way of placing has to be defined in a plan,
d) The placed HDPE layer must be fixed (e. g. sandbags),
e) No equipment must drive on the welded HDPE layers (only the necessary
equipment for welding), and
f) Every welding seam has to be double checked (stability, density with under
pressure method, thickness, visual inspection).
Geo-Textile – Protection Layer
For protection of the HDPE layer, a geo-textile must be applied. A geo-textile material, which is
needle-punched and non-woven will be used as a protection layer. For incorporation of the layer,
the following items have to be considered:
a) Weight of geo-textile ≥ 2000 g/m²,
b) Proof of stamp pushing through force,
c) Proof of strip tensile strength,
75
d) Static proof, and
e) Proof of stability and resistance to sliding during building and final state.
Laying of the geo-textile is carried out after acceptance of the layers laying underneath. No vehicles
must drive on the geo-textile no equipment or machines should be stored on this layer. The position
of the layer must be secured by appropriate measures to prevent them from getting lifted up (e. g.
sand bags).
Drainage Layer
A drainage layer, consisting of gravel with a grain size of 16/32 mm will be applied to assist
drainage of leachate. Gravel will consist of uniform sizes and be washed to ensure a high
permeability. Perforated HDPE leachate collection pipes will be embedded in the drainage layer to
further assist leachate collection. Leachate will drain towards the leachate pond. The thickness of
the drainage layer will be at least 300 mm. The gravel has to fulfil the following quality standards:
a. Permeability kf≥ 1 x 10-3 m/s and b. maximum 20 mass-% of carbonate.
(c) Surface Sealing
System General
To avoid negative impact of the landfill body a surface sealing system has to be installed after the
filling of the landfill or parts of it (landfill cells) are completed. The sealing system has to fulfil the
guidelines and technical requirements as defined in the EIA and in the MSW Rules, 2000. The
surface sealing system has to fulfil the following requirements:
1) 300 mm compensation layer,
2) 600 mm mineral sealing layer (clay), kf< = 1 x 10-9 m/s
3) 150 mm drainage layer, kf≥ 1 x 10-2 m/s
4) 450 mm re-cultivation layer.
After reaching the highest level of each construction phase, as final cover, the surface sealing
system has to be placed on top of the waste body. The surface sealing system will be constructed
with a maximum slope of 33 % in the embankment area.
76
Compensation Layer
After completing the waste filling, the waste surface will be re-profiled according to the planned
inclination of the surface sealing system. Above the waste surface, the compensation layer made of
a homogenous non-binding material will be applied. The thickness of the layer will be 300 mm. The
layer will be the foundation for the mineral-sealing layer.
Mineral Sealing Layer
On top of the compensation layer a mineral sealing layer with a thickness of 600 mm (after
compaction) will be placed.
This layer will be incorporated in two layers of 300mm each (after compaction). The mineral
sealing layer of the surface has to fulfil the same quality standards as the mineral sealing layer of
the base.
Drainage Layer
The drainage layer consisting of gravel with a grain size of 16/32 mm will be used for discharging
the rainwater, which will infiltrate into the re-cultivation layer.
The thickness of the drainage layer will be at least 150 mm. The gravel has to fulfil the same quality
standards as described for the drainage layer of the base sealing system.
Re-cultivation Layer
The re-cultivation layer (topsoil) will be used for the final restoration of the site. The re- cultivation
layer will have a thickness of at least 450 mm.
Plants will be placed in accordance to the local flora as provided in the vicinity of the site. In order
to protect the sealing system, deep rooting plants must be avoided. The plants have to protect the
total sealing system against wind and water erosion and have to minimise rainwater infiltration.
Tests and Samples during Construction of the Sealing Systems
The tests and samples during construction of the sealing system need to be agreed with the
Contracting Authority but it is likely that they will include the following items.
77
Aptitude Test
The fundamental suitability (aptitude test) of the used materials provided for the mineral base and
surface sealing system must be proven before construction works start. The suitability tests of the
used mineral sealing material have to be approved by laboratory tests and a test field. The following
laboratory testing is required:
a) grain-size distribution
b) water content
c) consistency of material
d) water absorption of material
e) portion of organic materials
f) portion of carbonate
g) density
h) proctor density
i) water permeability
j) homogeneity
The suitability of the used drainage material has to be also approved by laboratory tests. The
following tests are required:
a) grain-size distribution
b) content of organic materials
c) content of carbonate
Test Field
Within a test field the suitability of the clay must be proven under the supposed site conditions.
These test fields are the basis for all conditions stipulated for later application by an independent
supervisor.
Construction starts with 4 layers of 225 mm each and includes all above mentioned laboratory tests
and examinations required for each layer by taking some samples. Visual tests have to be
performed by trial pits. The test fields have to be performed outside of the sealing areas. The results
from the test field (including the results of the laboratory tests) must be evaluated and documented
including the following statements with regard to the design of the mineral sealing system:
a) Compacting methods
78
b) Compacting equipment
c) Number of compacting transitions
d) Operation speed of compacting equipment
e) Thickness of un-compacted layers (before compaction)
f) Type of homogenisation
The test field must be at least 20 m in length, the minimum width must be 2 machine widths plus
the required ramps 1: 10 and the embankments 1: 5 as well as the distance of acceleration and
deceleration with driving tracks as wide as the equipment, which are arranged alongside. The test
fields should be located at the bottom and embankment area of the landfill. They should represent
the same slopes as landfill. After the mineral sealing material has been tested, the application of the
other sealing compounds, protection layer and drainage layer will be tested in the test field
accordingly. This will be done for the base sealing as well as for the surface sealing.
Quality Assurance during Construction Works
For the quality assurance during construction works the requirements are as follows:
a) The mineral sealing layers must be built under weather conditions which are in
compliance with required conditions (water content, degree of compression,
coefficient of permeability; example: no construction during heavy rain fall)
b) The top of each completed layer of the mineral sealing system must be dewatered
sufficiently. Shrinkage cracks must be avoided by taking technical measures.
c) Soil lumps which are bigger than 32 mm shall not be used for construction the
mineral sealing.
d) The sealing material must be homogenous and show regular placement water
content. The layers must achieve a homogenous sealing mass. The layers shall
overlap.
e) After completion of each compacted layer an acceptance test must be carried out
before starting the next layer.
f) During and after incorporation the following tests and checks must be carried out
especially for the mineral-sealing layer (for re-cultivation layer, drainage layer and
compensation layer the test has to be done similar):
79
(i) density
(ii) thickness of each layer
(iii) flatness of each layer
(iv) grain-size distribution
(v) water content
(vi) consistency of material
(vii) water absorption of material
(viii) proctor density
(ix) permeability
(x) content of organic parts & carbonate
These tests should be carried according a defined scheme. The laboratory test for the aptitude test
and the quality assurance during construction works have to be carried out by a qualified geo-
technical institute.
Design &Area Requirement
Based on the growth of population and the reduction of waste by recycling and treatment the
volume of waste to be taken to the landfill site has been calculated considering the following
assumptions:
• Waste generation as described
• 20% rejects to be landfilled in case of Compost Processing Plant
• Daily covering of waste (10% of waste volume)
• Specific weight of waste in average 0.85 t/m³
The rejects and inert materials from the processing plant shall be land filled at the engineered sanitary
landfill as per MSW Rules 2000.
Exhibit 30: Area Requirement for Sanitary Landfill
Assumptions
Density of Landfill Waste T/ m3 0.85 v h/3 (a2+axb+b2)
Height of cell m 5.00 b 4a
80
Slope to be maintained 0.25 a SQ.RT((3V)/13h))
Inflation Rate (base: 2014) % 5
Wastage % 10
Side cover etc. % 15
Phases I II III IV
Start Year 2016 2023 2030 2037
Till Year 2022 2029 2036 2046
Inflation Multiplier 1.10 1.55 2.18 3.07
Cum. Landfill waste till (TPD) 52,833.99 62,006.45 84,054.35 114,623.60
Cum. Landfill waste till (m3) 62,157.64 72,948.77 98,887.47 134,851.29
Bund + daily cover (10%) m3 6215.76 7294.88 9888.75 13485.13
Total Volume cum 68373.40 80243.64 108776.22 148336.42
Top Width m 39.72 43.03 50.10 58.51
Base Width m 158.89 172.13 200.41 234.03
Top area sq.m 1577.85 1851.78 2510.22 3423.15
Top area acre 0.3897 0.4574 0.6200 0.8455
Bottom area sq.m 25245.56 29628.42 40163.53 54770.37
Bottom area acre 6.2357 7.3182 9.9204 13.5283
Phases I II III IV
Liner area (115% of Bottom area)
sq.m 29032.40 34072.69 46188.06 62985.93
HDPE pipes (consider square landfill)
Leachate collection pipes
Base Width m 158.89 172.13 200.41 234.03
No of Main Pipes Nos. 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Length of Main Pipes m 158.89 172.13 200.41 234.03
Spacing b/w lateral pipes m 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Length of Lateral pipes m 79.44 86.06 100.20 117.02
No of Lateral pipes Nos. 33 36 42 48
Total No of lateral pipes Nos. 66 72 84 96
81
Surface water drainage layer
pipes
Length of Main pipes m 39.72 43.03 50.10 58.51
No of Main Pipes Nos. 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Length of Lateral pipes m 19.86 21.52 25.05 29.25
Spacing b/w lateral pipes m 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
No of Lateral pipes Nos. 17 19 22 25
Total No of lateral pipes Nos. 34 38 44 50
Length of Main Pipes m 993.05 1,075.81 1,252.55 1,462.69
Length of Lateral Pipes m 5,918.60 7,014.26 9,519.40 12,696.17
Filling Volume Calculations
Bund
Length m 636 689 802 936
Width m 2 2 2 2
Height m 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Bund Volume 636 689 802 936
Bottom Layer
Base Area m2 25246 29628 40164 54770
Height m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Phases I II III IV
Bottom Layer Volume 25,245.56 29,628.42 40,163.53 54,770.37
Vegetation Layer
Top Area m2 1,577.85 1,851.78 2,510.22 3,423.15
Height m 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Vegetation Layer Volume 473.35 555.53 753.07 1,026.94
Total Filling Volume m3 26,354.47 30,872.47 41,718.23 56,733.44
Particulars Unit Qty I Qty II Qty III Qty IV
Excavation Sq. m 25,245.56 29,628.42 40,163.53 54,770.37
Liner layers
Clay Liner Sq. m 36,725.98 43,101.95 58,427.89 79,677.20
82
HDPE Liner Sq. m 36,725.98 43,101.95 58,427.89 79,677.20
Non-woven Layer Sq. m 36,725.98 43,101.95 58,427.89 79,677.20
Geo Textile Layer Sq. m 36,725.98 43,101.95 58,427.89 79,677.20
HPDE Pipes - Main (75mm) m 993.05 1,075.81 1,252.55 1,462.69
HPDE Pipes - lateral (40mm) m 5,918.60 7,014.26 9,519.40 12,696.17
Filling for bund, Mineral layer and earth to be disposed
Sq. m 26,354.47 30,872.47 41,718.23 56,733.44
Leachate collection system LS 36,725.98 43,101.95 58,427.89 79,677.20
City Sanitation Plan Page 83
BIOMETHANATION PLANT
Salient features of the Bio Methanization Plant
• Modified UASB model bio-digester of 5 MT /day capacity comprising
of segregation room inlet cum recycle chamber.
• Anaerobic digester of 7.7 m dia and 6.7 m height, sludge holding
tank/engine control room, gas holding balloon.
• Electro mechanical items are Bio shredder, sorting table, pumps, bio
gas storage system, Bio gas blower with motor, pressurerised bio gas
tank, biological scrubber, bio gas engine of 40/50 KVA, flame arrestor,
bio gas flame with moisture trap.
Gas generation
Power generation
Organic fertilizer
= 300 M3 / day.
= 480 Kwh/day
= 175 Tons/annum
City Sanitation Plan Page 84
PROPOSED MSW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Refuse
Refusing is one of the newer ‘5R’s. Some people also call it pre-cycling. In
terms of smart waste management, this is the simple act of refusing the
excessive or unnecessary packaging. When shopping, it means saying "no
thanks" to a bag for small purchases that you can easily carry in your hands.
You can also refuse- choose to not buy - foods, beverages, or other products
in fancy, multilayer packaging that you will just have to throw into the trash
as soon as you open them.
Refuse the use of plastic carry bags, cups, disposables, thermocol. disposable
or single use products such as razors, eating utensils, plates, and cups.
Refuse the products which have more packaging materials. Do not buy products which may harm your environment. The alternative is to
use non-biodegradable products sparingly. .
For example: Cleaning products for floors etc. Cleaning products for dishes,
Polish.
Reduce
Reducing means producing less waste so that you throw away less trash and
garbage into landfills. Reducing is the most effective way to manage waste
and the place to begin whenever you can. A simple step at the grocery store:
Bring your own cloth or mesh bags, so you don't take either paper or plastic!
You have immediately reduced the bags you might throw into the trash
when you get home. How to remember your bags? Always keep them in the
car or right by the door.
Many items that we would normally throw out can be repaired, upgraded, or
reused. This is usually cheaper than buying a new one and saves the space of
disposing of the old one. These items include tires, shoes, home and office
furniture and equipment, lighting fixtures, lawnmowers, electronics, clothes,
and automotive parts.
Consider reupholstering, refinishing, or donating old furniture to be used
again.
Have large appliances repaired instead of buying new ones. Reuse
City Sanitation Plan Page 85
Reusing products prevents you from producing more
waste. For example
Reuse plastic bags, Newspaper also can be reused for packaging or
wrapping.
Donate unwanted clothing in good condition to charity shops. Clothes which
are worn out or in unsalable condition can be turned into wiping clothes.
Tins, glasses etc. can be used as storage containers for sugar, tea bags,
salt etc.
Reuse disposal crockery Reusing is pretty simple once you get into the habit, like writing a shopping
list on an opened envelope or the back of office paper rather than on a brand
new sheet. Plastic bags (both large white bags and clear produce bags) can be
reused several times before they are recycled.
Recycle
The process of transforming materials into secondary resources for
manufacturing new products is known as Recycling.
Waste recycling leads to less utilization of raw materials, saves on landfill
space, reduces the amount of energy required to manufacture new products.
In fact recycling can prevent the creation of waste at the source.
Prepare your recyclables according to the directions given by your recycling
provider. This will make it easier and less costly for them to continue
providing these services.
Dry waste consisting of cans, aluminium foils, plastics, metal, glass, and paper
could be recycled.
Turn “waste” into a new product. For example: Bottle caps can be used for making bags, chairs or tables.
Ring pulls from drink and food cans can be woven into form bags. Patches
of old cloth can be used for making cushions or teddies. Make earrings out
of newspaper. Roll the paper into the shape of pearls, and then paint and
varnish them.
Recover
Source separation: by keeping recyclables and organics waste separate at
source, i.e., at the point of generation facilitate reuse, recycling, and
composting to recover nutrient value from organic matter.
Home composting is best option to recover the nutrient at decentralized at
source itself.
City Sanitation Plan Page 86
Energy can be recovered from the Bio Methonisation Potential waste such as
food waste, vegetable and food waste and slaughter waste through Bio
Digseter. This can avoid the Green House Gas discharged in to atmosphere
responsible for Global Warming.
Simple way of recovering the vegetable waste and market waste in to
nitrogen enriched cow dung by feeding the cattle.
City Sanitation Plan Page 87
Recovery of Recycling
The recyclable waste will be collected separately with various methods and
sorted out in the mechanized sorting table according to the nature and sold.The
Municipality is also planning to buy another higher capacity plastic pulverizer for
plastic materials processing.
In plastic reprocessing after the types of plastic separated is a Mechanical
processing to run the plastic through the Pulverizer.
Pulverizer crushes the plastic into tiny shreds or granules. Plastic pulverizer
is the particular equipment for recycling disused insignificant materials in
producing and grinding heat-sensitivity plastic such as PVC.
The recovered shredded plastic will be used for laying plastic road as the
partial replacement of bitumen.
Baling machine will also be installed to bale rags as RDF.
City Sanitation Plan Page 60
Green belt Development
In order to nullify the effects emission of carbon do oxide during composting
process, it is planned to develop the green belt all-around the compost yard on
the periphery of the compound wall in two rows where is possible using thorn
less bamboo. Bamboo is the best practical atmospheric carbon absorbing plant. It
is the fastest and least expensive way to solve the problems of Carbon dioxide
emission and water pollution. It is proposed to plant Thorn less variety Bamboo
all around the compost plant as green belt and the plantation will be carried out
on completion of the construction of compound wall.
City Sanitation Plan
WATER SUPPLY
City Sanitation Plan
Presence status of Water supply 1. Population of the Town (2011) : 2,22,619 2. Area : 36.31 Sqm 3. No. of Wards : 51 4. Water supply Scheme : Colloren
• Source - Colloren
• Colloren Scheme 22.66 MLD
• BW Source - 7.39MLD
• Total - 30.05MLD
• - 135 LPCD
• Frequency of Water Supply 2 Hours ( Daily)
• Total length of pumping main line 9.00km
• Total length of Distribution line 334.70km
• Total No of Public Fountain 1110
6. Head Works ( Thirumanoor )
• Functioning Since - 1975
• No of Infiltration Well - 1 No ( 8m Dia & 15 m Depth)
• No of Motors – 2 No of 120 HP VT Motor – Parallel Pumping
• Present Stage of Water Discharged – 8450 LPM
• Hours of Pupming - 22.00 Hrs
• Total Quantity of Water Pumped – 24 MLD
7. Vennar Pumping Station
• No of Motors – 4 No of 125 HP VT Motor(SRVS),30HP(Karanthai), 120 HP( Extenstion ), 125
HP( OLD Vennar)
• Total Quantity of Water Pumped – 24 MLD
8. OHT
• No of O.H.T - 19 Nos
• No of Sumps - 5 Nos
• Total Storage - 115.23 LL
9. Power Pumps
• Total No of Power pumps - 142
• Quantity of water Drawn - 7.28 MLD
10. Mini Power Pumps
• Total No of Mini Power pumps - 219
• Quantity of water Drawn - 0.22 MLD
11. Present Stage
• Thirumanoor Head works - 20.00 MLD
• Bore Wells - Power Pumps - 7.28 MLD
City Sanitation Plan
• Bore Wells – Mini-Power Pumps - 0.22 MLD
• Toatl Quanity of water supplied - 27.50 MLD
Daily Supply 123.50 LPCD
12. Tariff Deposit (Rs) Monthly Charges ( Rs)
• Domestic 4000 75
• Non Domestic 6000 150
• Industrial 10000 225
13. Annual Income
• Water charges Annual Demand Income - 262.45 Lakhs
14. HSC
• Domestic 28021
• Non Domestic 1179
• Total 29200
City Sanitation Plan
UNDER GROUND
SEWERAGE SCHEME
City Sanitation Plan
CITY SALIENT FEATURES
Total Area : 36.31 Sq.km
Total Population (2011 Census ) : 222619
Total No of House holds : 54438
Total No of Council Wards : 51
UGSS fully Covered wards : 39
UGSS Partially Covered wards : 12
UGSS Uncovered wards : 0
City Sanitation Plan
UGSS SALIENT FEATURES
Sl.
No
Description
1 Name of Urban Local Body Thanjavur
2 Name of the State Tamil Nadu
3 Area of the town 36.31 Sqm
4 Population as per 2011 census 222619
5 Length of collection system 259.78 KM
6 No. of Pumping and Lift stations Pumping Station – 5
Lifting Station - 12
7 Type of Sewage Treatment Plant A.S.P
8 Quantity of Sewage in MLD 28.05 MLD
i Designed quantity 28.05 MLD
ii Quantity as on date 13.00 MLD
9 Area of STP in acre 42 Acre
10 Cost of Land used for STP Free of Cost
11 Capital cost incurred for establishment of STP 9 Crores
12 Power Consumption / per annum (for STP only) in
units
84827 Units
13 Cost incurred for Electrical power per annum Rs.4,66,551/-
14 Characteristics of sewage after treatment
i BOD 30 mg / Ltr
ii COD 42 mg / Ltr
iii TSS 30 mg / Ltr
iv pH 6.8
15 Cost of Operation and Maintenance (Private
Agency Maintenance) per annum
Rs.144.00 Lakhs/year
(As per agreement Value 2003)
16 Disposal to Samuthiram Eri
City Sanitation Plan
SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS
I- SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AT SAMUTHIRAM
ERI
STP COMPONENTS
SALIENT DETAILS
THANJAVUR UNDER GROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME
SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
Design Period : 30 years
Base Year : 2003
Intermediate Period : 15 years(2018)
Ultimate Period : 30 years(2033) 1) POPULATION
Population (2000) :
Population(2003) : 247000
Present Population(2008) : 280500
Intermediate Population(2018) : 335036
Ultimate Population(2033) : 446715
Percapita supply of water : 120 LPCD
Sewage contribution : 100LPCD
Quantity of sewage present (2003) 24.70 mld
Quantity of sewage present (2008) 28.05 mld
Quantity of sewage intermediate (2018) 33.50 mld
Quantity of sewage ultinate (2033) 44.67 mld
Peak factor : 2.25 2) FLOW DETAILS (IN LPM)
a)Average (Present) : 5213
(Intermediate) : 7819
(Ultimate) : 10425 b)Peak
(Present) : 11729
(Intermediate) : 17592
(Ultimate) : 23456 3) QUANTITY OF SEWAGE (IN MLD)
Present(2003) : 8.29
City Sanitation Plan
Present(2008) : 9.34
Intermediate(2018) : 11.26
Uiltimate(2033) : 15.01
4 INLET CHAMBER i)size :
ii)depth :
iii) Thickness of wall :
iv)Thickness of base slab :
5 SCREEN CHAMBER
i)size :
ii)depth :
iii) Thickness of wall :
iv)Thickness of base slab :
6 GRIT CHAMBER
i)size :
ii)depth :
iii) Thickness of wall :
iv)Thickness of base slab :
v)Storage Depth :
vi)Detention Time :
7 FLOW MEASURING CHANNEL
i)size :
ii)depth :
iii) Thickness of wall
iv)Thickness of base slab :
v)Storage Depth :
vi)Detention Time
8 DISTRIBUTION CHAMBER-1 :
i)size :
ii)depth
iii) Thickness of wall :
iv)Thickness of base slab :
v)Storage Depth
vi)Detention Time :
9 DISTRIBUTION CHAMBER-2 :
City Sanitation Plan
i)size :
ii)depth :
iii) Thickness of wall :
iv)Thickness of base slab
v)Storage Depth
vi)Detention Time
10 PRIMARY CLARIFIER :
i)size :
ii)depth
iii) Thickness of wall :
iv)Thickness of base slab :
v)Storage Depth
vi)Detention Time :
11 AERATOR :
i)size
ii)depth
iii) Thickness of wall :
iv)Thickness of base slab :
v)Storage Depth
vi)Detention Time :
12 SECONDARY CLARIFIER :
i)size
ii)depth :
iii) Thickness of wall :
iv)Thickness of base slab
v)Storage Depth
vi)Detention Time :
13 EFFLUENT CHANNEL :
i)size
ii)depth :
iii) Thickness of wall :
iv)Thickness of base slab
v)Storage Depth :
vi)Detention Time :
14 PRIMARY SUMP
i)size
ii)depth :
iii) Thickness of wall :
iv)Thickness of base slab
v)Storage Depth :
vi)Detention Time :
15 SECONDARY SUMP
City Sanitation Plan
i)size :
ii)depth :
iii) Thickness of wall
iv)Thickness of base slab
v)Storage Depth
vi)Detention Time
16 FILTRATE SUMP
i)size
ii)depth :
iii) Thickness of wall :
iv)Thickness of base slab
v)Storage Depth :
vi)Detention Time :
17 BIO-DIGESTOR
i)size :
ii)depth :
iii) Thickness of wall
iv)Thickness of base slab
v)Storage Depth :
vi)Detention Time :
18 SLUDGE DRYING BED
i)size :
ii)depth :
iii) Thickness of wall
iv)Thickness of base slab :
v)Storage Depth :
vi)Detention Time
ZONE-I
Design Period : 30 years
Base Year : 2003
Intermediate Period : 15 years(2018)
Ultimate Period : 30 years(2033)
Ward covered : 1 1 POPULATION
Population (2000) : 3775
Population(2003) : 4304
City Sanitation Plan
Present Population(2008) : 4907
Intermediate Population(2018) : 5832
Ultimate Population(2033) : 7777
Percapita supply of water : 120 LPCD
Sewage contribution : 100LPCD
Peak factor : 3 2 FLOW DETAILS (IN LPM)
a)Average (Present) : 270
(Intermediate) : 405
(Ultimate) : 540 b)Peak
(Present) : 810
(Intermediate) : 1215
(Ultimate) : 1620 3 QUANTITY OF SEWAGE (IN MLD)
Present(2003) : 0.43
Present(2008) : 0.49
Intermediate(2018) : 0.58
Uiltimate(2033) : 0.78
4 LENGTH OF SEWERLINE : 4268m
5 NUMBER OF MANHOLES : 163 Nos
6 PUMPING MAIN
a)Size of main : 200mm CI
b)Length of main : 1180m
c)Designed for Ultimate peak flow : 1620 lpm
7 PUMPING STATION
a)SCREENWELL
i)size of well : 1.13mx2.34m
ii)depth of well : 5.92m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.30m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.30m
v)Screen size : 0.415mx1.m-2Nos
City Sanitation Plan
b) GRITWELL
i)size of well : 3.21mx3.0m
ii)depth of well : 6.27m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.30m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.30m
c)WETWELL
i)Diametre of well : 4.0m
ii)depth of well : 8.70m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.50m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.50m
v)Storage Depth : 1.31m
vi)Detention Time : 10 minutes
d)Valve Chamber size : 3.0mx2.75mx2.10m
e)PUMPSET
i)Type of Submersible : Submersible
ii) Make of pumpset : M/S Kishore Pumpset (pvt) Ltd
iii)Intermediate average
HP : 7.5
DUTY : 405 lpmx 21m
iv)Intermediate peak
HP : 15
DUTY : 810lpmx21m
f)Standbye Pumpset
HP : 7.5
DUTY : 405 lpmx 21m
g)GENERATOR
Capacity : 25KVA
Make : M/S Kirloskar pvt Ltd
h)TRANSFORMER : --------
i)Control room cum DG room : 4mx6mx4m
8 HOUSE SERVICE CONNECTION : 420 Nos
City Sanitation Plan
ZONE-II
Design Period : 30 years
Base Year : 2003
Intermediate Period : 15 years(2018)
Ultimate Period : 30 years(2033)
Ward covered : 2,3,4,5 1 POPULATION
Population (2000) : 19189
Population(2003) : 21875
Present Population(2008) : 24938
Intermediate Population(2018) : 29647
Ultimate Population(2033) : 39530
Percapita supply of water : 120 LPCD
Sewage contribution : 100LPCD
Peak factor : 2.5 2 FLOW DETAILS (IN LPM)
a)Average (Present) : 1022
(Intermediate) : 2059
(Ultimate) : 2745 b)Peak
(Present) : 2554
(Intermediate) : 5147
(Ultimate) : 6863
3 QUANTITY OF SEWAGE (IN MLD)
Present(2003) : 2.19
Present(2008) : 2.49
Intermediate(2018) : 2.96
Uiltimate(2033) : 3.95
4 LENGTH OF SEWERLINE : 25507m
5 NUMBER OF MANHOLES : 1066 Nos
6 PUMPING MAIN
a)Size of main : 350mm PSC-6Ksc
b)Length of main : 1890m
c)Designed for Ultimate peak flow : 8483 lpm
City Sanitation Plan
7 PUMPING STATION
a)SCREENWELL
i)size of well : 1.86mx2.34m
ii)depth of well : 7.13m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.30m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.30m
v)Screen size : 0.78mx1.0m-2Nos
b) GRITWELL
i)size of well : 3.43mx3.08m
ii)depth of well : 7.28m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.30m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.30m
c)WETWELL
i)Diametre of well : 4.0m
ii)depth of well : 11.50m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.60m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.75m
v)Storage Depth : 2.70m
vi)Detention Time : 10 minutes
d)Valve Chamber size : 4.0mx2.75mx2.10m
e)PUMPSET
i)Type of Submersible : Submersible
ii) Make of pumpset : M/S Kishore Pumpset (pvt) Ltd
iii)Intermediate average
HP : 35
DUTY : 2464 lpmx 24m
iv)Intermediate peak
HP : 50
DUTY : 3696lpmx24m
f)Standbye Pumpset
HP : 35
DUTY : 2464 lpmx 24m
City Sanitation Plan
g)GENERATOR
Capacity : 100KVA
Make : M/S Kirloskar pvt Ltd
h)TRANSFORMER : --------
i)Control room cum DG room : 8mx6mx4m
8 HOUSE SERVICE CONNECTION : 2650 Nos
9 LIFTING STATIONS
1 at Krishnankoil
a)Lift well
Diametre of well : 3m
Depth of well : 9.66m
b)Pumping Main
Size of Main : 300mm CI
Length of Main : 90m
c)Pumpset details
HP : 5
Duty of pumpset : 917 lpm x 12m
2 at Kodiammankoil
a)Lift well
Diametre of well : 2.5m
Depth of well : 8.39m
b)Pumping Main
Size of Main : 150mm CI
Length of Main : 450m
c)Pumpset details
HP : 10
Duty of pumpset : 1717 lpm x 12m
3 at Sunganthidal
a)Lift manhole
Diametre : 1.2m
Depth : 5.44m
b)Pumping Main
Size of Main : 150mm CI
Length of Main : 870m
c)Pumpset details
HP : 3
Duty of pumpset : 95 lpm x 6m
3 at kodikalur
a)Lift manhole
Diametre : 1.2m
Depth : 5.44m
b)Pumping Main
City Sanitation Plan
Size of Main : 150mm CI
Length of Main : 550m
c)Pumpset details
HP : 3
Duty of pumpset : 405 lpm x 13 m
ZONE-III
Design Period : 30 years
Base Year : 2003
Intermediate Period : 15 years(2018)
Ultimate Period : 30 years(2033)
Ward covered : 9,10,11,12,13,14,15,26,27,28,29, 30,31,32,33,34&44(17Nos)
1) POPULATION
Population (2000) : 73014
Population(2003) : 83236
Present Population(2008) : 94889
Intermediate Population(2018) : 112798
Ultimate Population(2033) : 150390
Percapita supply of water : 120 LPCD
Sewage contribution : 100LPCD
Peak factor : 2.25 2) FLOW DETAILS (IN LPM)
a)Average (Present) : 5222
(Intermediate) : 7833
(Ultimate) : 10444 b)Peak
(Present) : 11750
(Intermediate) : 17625
(Ultimate) : 23498
3) QUANTITY OF SEWAGE (IN MLD)
Present(2003) : 8.32
Present(2008) : 9.49
Intermediate(2018) : 11.28
City Sanitation Plan
Uiltimate(2033) : 15.04
4) LENGTH OF SEWERLINE : 43336m
5) NUMBER OF MANHOLES : 1841 Nos
6) PUMPING MAIN
a)Size of main : 800mm PSC-4Ksc
b)Length of main : 60m
c)Designed for Ultimate peak flow : 47434lpm
7) PUMPING STATION
a)SCREENWELL
i)size of well : 3.33mx2.34m
ii)depth of well : 8.74m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.30m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.40m
v)Screen size : 1.515mx1.0m-2Nos
b) GRITWELL
i)size of well : 3.33mx3.33m
ii)depth of well : 8.99m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.30m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.40m
c)WETWELL
i)Diametre of well : 9.35m
ii)depth of well : 10.80m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.30m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.95m
v)Storage Depth : 2.50m
vi)Detention Time : 5minutes
d)Valve Chamber size : 7.0mx2.75mx2.10m
e)PUMPSET
i)Type of Submersible : Submersible
ii) Make of pumpset : M/S Kishore Pumpset (pvt) Ltd
iii)Intermediate average
City Sanitation Plan
HP : 80
DUTY : 11859 lpmx 17m
iv)Intermediate peak
HP : 80-2Nos
DUTY : 11859 lpmx 17m
f)Standbye Pumpset
HP : 80
DUTY : 11859 lpmx 17m
g)GENERATOR
Capacity : 320KVA
Make : M/S Kirloskar pvt Ltd
h)TRANSFORMER : --------
i)Control room cum DG room : 8mx6mx4m
8) HOUSE SERVICE CONNECTION : 10100 Nos
9 LIFTING
STATIONS
1 at Cholan Nagar
a)Lift Manhole
Diametre : 1.2m
Depth : 3.1m
b)Pumping Main
Size of Main : 100mm PVC
Length of Main : 90m
c)Pumpset details
HP : 5
Duty of pumpset : 917 lpm x 12m
ZONE-IV
Design Period : 30 years
Base Year : 2003
Intermediate Period : 15 years(2018)
Ultimate Period : 30 years(2033)
Ward covered : 6,7,8,16,17,18,19,20,21,23,24 & 25 (12Nos)
1) POPULATION
Population (2000) : 48009
Population(2003) : 54730
City Sanitation Plan
Present Population(2008) : 62392
Intermediate Population(2018) : 74170
Ultimate Population(2033) : 98900
Percapita supply of water : 120 LPCD
Sewage contribution : 100LPCD
Peak factor : 2.25 2) FLOW DETAILS (IN LPM)
a)Average (Present) : 3434
(Intermediate) : 5151
(Ultimate) : 6868 b)Peak
(Present) : 7726
(Intermediate) : 11589
(Ultimate) : 15453 3) QUANTITY OF SEWAGE (IN
MLD)
Present(2003) : 5.47
Present(2008) : 6.24
Intermediate(2018) : 7.42
Uiltimate(2033) : 9.89
4) LENGTH OF SEWERLINE : 32027m
5) NUMBER OF MANHOLES : 1474 Nos
6) PUMPING MAIN
a)Size of main : 500mm PSC-2Ksc
b)Length of main : 1250m
c)Designed for Ultimate peak flow : 23935lpm
7) PUMPING STATION
a)SCREENWELL
i)size of well : 2.34mx2.34m
ii)depth of well : 8.77m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.30m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.40m
City Sanitation Plan
v)Screen size : 1.025mx1.0m-2Nos
b) GRITWELL
i)size of well : 4.45mx4.36m
ii)depth of well : 8.92m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.30m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.40m
c)WETWELL
i)Diametre of well : 7.0m
ii)depth of well : 11.75m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.30m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.60m
v)Storage Depth : 2.70m
vi)Detention Time : 10minutes
d)Valve Chamber size : 4.0mx2.75mx2.10m
e)PUMPSET
i)Type of Submersible : Submersible
ii) Make of pumpset : M/S Kishore Pumpset (pvt) Ltd
iii)Intermediate average
HP : 30
DUTY : 5150 lpmx 14m
iv)Intermediate peak
HP : 60
DUTY : 6440lpmx 17m
f)Standbye Pumpset
HP : 30
DUTY : 5150 lpmx 14m
g)GENERATOR
Capacity : 162.50KVA
Make : M/S Kirloskar pvt Ltd
h)TRANSFORMER : --------
i)Control room cum DG room : 8mx6mx4m
8) HOUSE SERVICE CONNECTION : 6630 Nos
9 LIFT STATION
At Reddipalayam-1
a)Lift Manhole
Diametre : 1.20m
Depth :
City Sanitation Plan
b)Pumping Main :
Size of main :
Length of main :
c)Pumpset :
HP :
Duty :
At Reddipalayam-2 :
a)Lift Manhole :
Diametre :
Depth :
b)Pumping Main :
Size of main :
Length of main :
c)Pumpset :
HP :
Duty :
ZONE-V
Design Period : 30 years
Base Year : 2003
Intermediate Period : 15 years(2018)
Ultimate Period : 30 years(2033)
Ward covered : 22,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,45,46,47,48,49,50,51(17 Nos)
1)
POPULATION
Population (2000) : 72871
Population(2003) : 82855
Present Population(2008) : 93374
Intermediate Population(2018) : 112589
Ultimate Population(2033) : 150118
Percapita supply of water : 120 LPCD
Sewage contribution : 100LPCD
Peak factor : 2.25 2)
FLOW DETAILS (IN LPM) a)Average
(Present) : 5213
City Sanitation Plan
(Intermediate) : 7819
(Ultimate) : 10425 b)Peak
(Present) : 11729
(Intermediate) : 17592
(Ultimate) : 23456 3)
QUANTITY OF SEWAGE (IN MLD)
Present(2003) : 8.29
Present(2008) : 9.34 Intermediate(2018)
: 11.26
Uiltimate(2033) : 15.01
4) LENGTH OF SEWERLINE : 154642m
5) NUMBER OF MANHOLES : 5515 Nos
6) PUMPING MAIN
a)Size of main : 600mm PSC-4Ksc
b)Length of main : 4650m
c)Designed for Ultimate peak flow : 23456lpm
7)
PUMPING STATION
a)SCREENWELL
i)size of well : 2.34mx2.34m
ii)depth of well : 8.66m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.30m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.50m
v)Screen size : 1.0mx1.0m-2Nos
b) GRITWELL
i)size of well : 2.30mx2.30m
ii)depth of well : 8.81m
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.30m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.50m
c)WETWELL
i)Diametre of well : 8.0m
ii)depth of well : 11.95m
City Sanitation Plan
iii) Thickness of wall : 0.50m
iv)Thickness of base slab : 0.50m
v)Storage Depth : 3.10m
vi)Detention Time : 10minutes
d)Valve Chamber size : 4.0mx2.75mx2.10m
e)PUMPSET
i)Type of Submersible : Submersible
ii) Make of pumpset : M/S Kishore Pumpset (pvt) Ltd
iii)Intermediate average
HP : 75
DUTY : 7820 lpmx 23m
iv)Intermediate peak
HP : 100
DUTY : 9775lpmx 23m
f)Standbye Pumpset
HP : 75
DUTY : 7820 lpmx 23m
g)GENERATOR
Capacity : 250 KVA
Make : M/S Kirloskar pvt Ltd
h)TRANSFORMER : --------
i)Control room cum DG room : 10mx6mx4m
8)
HOUSE SERVICE CONNECTION : 10200 Nos
9 LIFTING
STATIONS
1 at Selvam Nagar
a)Lift well
Diametre of well : 4m
Depth of well : 7.61m
b)Pumping Main
Size of Main : 500mm PSC
Length of Main : 1080 m
c)Pumpset details
HP : 50
Duty of pumpset : 7067 lpm x 13 m
2 at LIC Colony
a)Lift well
Diametre of well : 2m
City Sanitation Plan
Depth of well : 8.48m
b)Pumping Main
Size of Main : 200mm CI
Length of Main : 540m
c)Pumpset details
HP : 4
Duty of pumpset : 617 lpm x 13m
3 at Shivaji Nagar
a)Lift well
Diametre of well : 1.5m
Depth of well : 4.64m
b)Pumping Main
Size of Main : 100mm CI
Length of Main : 210m
c)Pumpset details
HP : 4
Duty of pumpset : 133 lpm x 6 m
4 at Shathapillai Gate
a)Lift well
Diametre of well : 1.5m
Depth of well : 8.81 m
b)Pumping Main
Size of Main : 100mm CI
Length of Main : 150m
c)Pumpset details
HP : 4
Duty of pumpset : 228 lpm x 12 m
5 at Gandhiji Road
a)Lift well
Diametre of well : 1.5m
Depth of well : 4.59 m
b)Pumping Main
Size of Main : 100mm CI
Length of Main : 90m
c)Pumpset details
HP : 4
Duty of pumpset : 290 lpm x 6 m
6 at Pandian Nagar
City Sanitation Plan
a)Lift well
Diametre of well : 4m
Depth of well :
b)Pumping Main
Size of Main : 350mm PSC
Length of Main : 90m
c)Pumpset details
HP : 20
Duty of pumpset : 1634 lpm x 12 m
City Sanitation Plan
SEWAGE CHARACTERISTICS
Parameter
Unit
RAW SEWAGE TREATED EFFLUENT
Value
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
Mg/l
220 30 or less
BOD Mg/l 236 20 or less
COD Mg/l 452 250 or less
Ammonia Nitrogen
( as N)
Mg/l
50 Less than or equal to
50 mg /l
Total Phosphorous
( as PO4)
Mg/l
5 5 or less
Total coliform
MPN/ 100 ml
107
Less than or equal to 1000 no /100ml
PH
-
6.20
Less than or equal to
5.5 to 9
Oil& Grease
Mg/I
Less than 1
Less than or equal to 5mg/lit.
COMMISSIONER & SPECIAL OFFICER THANJAVUR CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
SEWAGE CHARACTERISTICS
Parameter UnitRAWSEWAGE TREATED EF'FLUENT
Value
Total SuspendedSolids (TSS) Mdl 220
30 or less
BOD Mgl 236 20 or less
COD Ms/l 452 250 or less
AmmoniaNitrogen
(asN)Me4 50
Less than or equal to
50 mg /lTotal Phosphorous
( as PO4)Mgl 5
5 or less
Total coliformI\,{PN/100ml
107
Less than or equal to1000 no /100m1
PH 6.20Less than or equal to
5.5 to 9
Oil& Grease Me/I Less than 1Less than or equal toSmglht.
AL CORPOMTION
City Sanitation Plan