Upload
tracy-pitts
View
222
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Menthol and Tobacco Regulation
A Global PerspectiveMichelle Dowle International Scientific Affairs Manager (Product
Regulatory Science)
September 11th 2013
Key Facts
Menthol cigarettes are:
What’s happening globally right now?
Varied approaches to science-based policy-making
1. WHO: Science Really Matters• The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
(FCTC) sets out several binding obligations • 177 parties • Hold a conference every two years• Menthol is one of a number of flavours referred to in
the Guidelines to Articles 9 &10 (Product Regulation)
• Partial Guidelines to Articles 9 & 10 adopted in 2010 state:
– “Mindful of the provisional nature of the guidelines and the need for periodical reassessment in light of the scientific evidence and country experience…”
– “The Guidelines drawing on the best available scientific evidence…”
– “Parties should consider scientific evidence, other evidence and experience of other countries when determining new measures on ingredients of tobacco products…”
2. EU: Science is getting lost
• Revision of the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD)• Binding on all 28 Member States• 500+ million population impacted• EU TPD2 is still under review• Includes a proposal to prohibit characterising
flavours, which would include menthol• Unclear what scientific evidence, if any, the
EU has used to establish its proposal to prohibit menthol
• Next vote at which menthol is being considered under Article 6 - October 8th
3. Brazil: What Science?
• In March 2012, a Brazilian regulator (ANVISA) became the first in the world to regulate to prohibit Menthol in tobacco products
• Implementation was due in autumn 2013• However, implementation has been
postponed• ANVISA is expected to issue a new regulation
4. Canada: But…
• October 2009 Bill C-32 was enacted to amend the 1989 Tobacco Act. It prohibits the use of all flavours but MPs made a decision not to prohibit Menthol.
• In the third meeting of the Standing Committee on Health an amendment was proposed to ban menthol as well. During debate of the amendment a Health Canada representative stated the following:
The research we have done indicates that menthol use is actually declining. It is not
something that youth view as attractive. When presented with it, they actually
refuse it and prefer something else. We do not feel that it is a product that needs to
be acted upon, and therefore we are not proposing action. In fact, it goes counter to
some of the evidence we have. According to our information, the use of menthol is
decreasing. We believe the amendment is not in the spirit of the bill.”
What’s influencing the menthol debate right now?
Policy-Maker misperceptions continue to colour regulatory
debate
Menthol Cigarette Debate: 3 Concerns Dominate Thinking
1. Toxicity: Are they harmful?
It is generally accepted by Regulators that Menthol does not increase the harm caused by cigarettes
2. Addictiveness: Do they get you hooked?
Smoking is addictive with or without ingredients
3. Attractiveness: Do they encourage use?
.
What is attractiveness?
What does the weight of evidence tell us?In 2012 BAT R&D carried out a preliminary review of 240 published research papers dealing with menthol cigarettes
InitiationSmoking
behaviourNicotine and dependence Cessation
Note: Of the above studies, more than 90% are independent researchers
With menthol-No evidence (6)Inconclusive (9)
Contribution (6)
With menthol -“Cooling” effect
(34)Decreased puff
intensity (4)No effect or inconclusive
(14)
Increased puff intensity (1)
NicotineWith menthol -
Decreased intake (2)
No effect or inconclusive (23)Increased intake
(10)Carbon Monoxide
With menthol - No effect or
inconclusive (10)Increased (6)
CessationWith menthol -
No effect or evidence (22)
Harder to quit (14)
Harm/cancer With menthol -No difference
(54)No effect or
evidence (19)Increased (9)
Harm
But more must be done to:
•Complete a scientific review
•Facilitate scientific research to help debunk common misperceptions
•Evaluate the quality of the science – the BAT Review includes all research papers irrespective of the quality of the science
Conclusion: The weight of evidence does not support the hypothesis that Menthol increases toxicity, addiction or attractiveness
Thanks for your attention!Feel free to contact me
Michelle Dowle: [email protected]
To learn more about our science: www.bat-science.com
September 11th 2013