Upload
gerald
View
753
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Technion - Israel Institute of TechnologyGrand Water Research InstituteRabin Desalination LaboratoryRabin Desalination Laboratory
Chemical Engineering Department
Membrane Processes for Desalination and Water Reuseand Water Reuse
Raphael Semiat
McDonnell International Scholars Academy2nd International Symposium of Energy and Environment
December 8 - 10, 2008
1
December 8 10, 2008Island Shangri-La Hong Kong
Water deficiency 2004
1 5B 3B1.5B 3B2004 2025
2004 2025
2Source: Seckler et al, 2002
Related DocumentsDriving Forces for Water R&D
Need for WaterRelated DocumentsNeed for Water
Global need, Industry, Agriculture, Remote L ti D tifi ti EtLocations, Desertification, Etc.
Cost Difference - (Industry/Urban - Agriculture)
C t Diff (Th l P M b P )Cost Difference - (Thermal Processes - Membrane Processes)
Technologies for Export
3 3RDL GWRI Technion
Desalination SitesPILOT PLANTS
NAHAL TANINIM (1997)
RO DESALINATION PLANTSFOR WATER QUALITYIMPROVEMENT
MIZPE SHALEM (1983) Large plants:
Haifa
NAHAL TANINIM (1997) BRACKISH (SURFACE) WATER
ASHDOD (1988) MEDITERRANEAN SEA
EILAT (1994)RED SEA
( )50 m3/day
EIN BOKEK (1988) 50 m 3/day
NEVE ZOHAR (1986) 50 m3 /day
NEOT HAKIKAR (1982)
g p
600Mm3/y by 2013
750 Mm3/y by 2020
Tel AvivJerusalem
CeasareaRO DESALINATION PLANTS FOR WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
KFAR DAROM (1989) 50 m3/day
NEOT HAKIKAR (1982) 50 m 3/day
EIDAN (1983) 50 m 3/day
EIN YAHAV (1992) 50 m 3/day
750 Mm /y by 2020
Hadera (100+)
A hd d (100) Ashdod
BeerSheva
NAHAL MORAG (1991) 50 m3/day
BEER ORA (1983)50 m3/day
EILOT (1986)
LOTAN (1983) 50 m 3/day
YAHEL (1979) 50 m3/day
KTURA (1983)
Ashdod (100)
Palmahim (30)EILOT (1986)
50 m3/day
RO DESALINATION PLANTS FOR WATER SUPPLY
KTURA (1983) 50 m3/day
GROFIT (1974) 50 m3/day
YOTVATA (1973) 50 m3/day
Brackish inland (50)
Ashkelon (100)MAAGAN MICHAEL (1994)
1,200 m3/day
BW - SABHA "A" (1978) 25,500 m 3/day
BW - SABHA "B" (1993) 10,000 m 3/day
MAALE SHACHARUT (1985) 50 m 3/day
ELIPAZ (1983) 50 m3/day
SAMAR (1979)
Ktziot (3)Tenders ‐ BOOT projects for
4
EilatSW - SABHA "C" (1997)
10,000 m 3/day
( )50 m3/day
SDE UVDA 1 (1979) 250 m3/day (RESERV.)
SDE UVDA 2 (1980) 500 m3/day (RESERV.) 4
25 years
Eilat PlantsEilat Plants
Sabha A: 25,500m3/day BWSabha B: 10,000 BWSabha C: 10,000 SW
5 5RDL GWRI Technion
cent/m3 - feed water Initial Design Actual Design Changes%
Investment 4.0 2.6 -35.0%Ch i l 5 8 2 4 58 6%Chemicals 5.8 2.4 -58.6% - HCl 2.96 1.85 -37.5% - NaHSO3 1.16 -100.0% - FeCl3 0.70 0.34 -51.7% - NaOCl 0.99 0.22 -78.1%
Operational Experience:
10.0
- NaOCl
- FeCl3
N HSO3
9.8-78.1%-51.7%
100%C
Experience:
Saving on chemicals
7.0
8.0
9.0 - NaHSO3
- HCl
5.8
-100%
-37.5%HEMICAL
chemicals.
Eilat plants
4 0
5.0
6.0
/m3 -
feed
wat
er
2 4
5.0
-58.6%
IN
LS
4.02.6
2.0
3.0
4.0
cent
/ 2.4
-35.0%
NVESTMEN
Initial Design Actual Design0.0
1.0
Initial Design Actual Design
T
7
AshkelonPlant
8
100,000.000 M3/year
Reverse Osmosis ‐Membrane Desalination
10RDL GWRI Technion Picometer 10-12 m Femtometer 10-15m …
Significant membrane propertiesMain Characteristic properties:p p
Selectivity
PermeabilityMembrane thickness,
P bilit j tiPermeability
Mechanical stability (creep and compaction)
h i l bili ( d l i bili
Permeability, rejection,
Size, size distribution
Anti fouling treatmentChemical Stability (Hydrolytic stability,
Organic material stability, pH,
Anti-fouling treatment
Catalitic reactivity.
Microbial resistance, Cl2 attack, etc.
•Surface anti-fouling properties(Phtalates, cellulose acetate, Chlorine in water, NaOH in cleaning,
I iti l fl d ti d d t i l dInitial fluxes reduction, suspended materials and precipitants (CaCO3, CaSO4, SiO2, CaF2, SrSO4, BaSO4, etc.) RDL GWRI Technion
Expensive product, 50/50 mm. A tool for production of the cheapest product on Earth, 5-6 m2
The RO cellulose acetate asymmetric membrane developed Loeb-Sourirajan in the middle 60. The thickness of the active layer is reduced since while improvement of surface properties.
12
Spiral Wound MembranesMembranes
membranes thickness-
200 nm and down200 nm and down.
Holes size and size distribution, membrane ,
properties
13RDL GWRI Technion
Bio-Fouling
14 RDL GWRI Technion
Man made polluted waters: Industrial, agriculture and urban effluents
StrainingModern Sewage Treatment
Secondarytreatment
Sludge/ solids treatment
Adsorptiontreatment
Micro/Ultra-FiltrationMBR
Energy Compost
15
Reverse-Osmosis or Nano-FiltrationConcentrate disposal
Polishing
RDL GWRI Technion
16 RDL GWRI Technion
Prof. Moris eizen
17
Performance of new membranes
50Rejection of CaCl2 0.1% by different membranes
20
30
40
ejec
tion
(%)
0
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Re
membrane type
18
Module view and sampling
Prof Carlos DozoretzProf. Carlos Dozoretz
3 2 1
7 6 5
9
4
1011 8
12131415
19
161718
Energy usage in Desalination ‐ comparisonSubject \ Fuel Gas Gasoil Heavy fuel CoalSubject \ Fuel Gas Gasoil Heavy fuel Coal
Caloric value Kcal/Kg fuel 9000 10750 10000 7700Caloric Value Kwht/Kg fuel 10.5 12.5 11.6 9Electricity production (45% eff.)Electricity production (45% eff.) Kwhe/Kg fuel large Power station 4.7 5.6 5.2 4Electricity production (80% eff.) High efficiency gas turbineHigh efficiency gas turbine Kwh/Kg fuel 8.4Capacity ‐ Seawater Desal (50% Recovery) m3/ kg fuel 1 3 1 6 1 5 1 2Recovery) m3/ kg fuel 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.2
80% efficiency 2.4Fuel consumption/ ton Desalinated water Kg fuel /m3 0 7 0 6 0 7 0 9Desalinated water Kg fuel /m3 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.9
80% efficiency 0.4How many km can I drive with 1 m3 Desal water fuel consumption? 2 7 2 6m3 Desal water fuel consumption? 2‐7 2‐6How many hours of AC ‐ single room (2.5 Kw‐h) can I operate? 1.4
Household Energy ConsumptionElectricity, transportation and desalinated water…
A small family, consumes water at a rate of 18 m3/month, 1200 KWh f l i i / h D i 1500 k / h1200 KWh of electricity /month, Drives 1500 km/month, consumes
160 liter gasoil/monthEnergy consumption assuming only desalinated seawater used ‐
140 KWh/ th (f l l )140 KWh/month (fuel value)Energy consumption ‐ driving a car ‐ 1500 KWh/month (fuel value)Energy consumption ‐ electricity ‐ 1200/0.45=2667 KWh/month
(f l l )(fuel value)
Energy for desalination/ energy for transportation ‐ 9.3%gy gy pEnergy for desalination/ energy for electricity ‐ 2.6%Energy for desalination/ total energy consumption ‐ 3.4%Can we save 3 4% in our household energy consumption?Can we save 3.4% in our household energy consumption?Where we should put our energy for use? In water? In high energy
consuming cars? In overused AC?
Desalination and proper water usagep p gOther costs should be included
besides Energybesides Energy• Cost of water in negligible for regular household
• Cost of water is tolerable for most industries
• Cost of water is significant in agricultureCost of water is significant in agricultureMake better usage of water:
– Use of greenhousesUse of greenhouses
– Use Drip‐Irrigation – save 30‐90% of water consumption by other irrigation techniques – reduceconsumption by other irrigation techniques reduce the cost problem
Pushing the Limits of DesalinationR d ti f RO d li ti tReduction of RO desalination process costs
Main directions for reducing desalination costsM b iMembrane improvement
Permeability, rejection, resistance to foulingConcentration polarization - FlowConcentration polarization - Flow
Improvement of membrane modulesFouling and scaling preventiong g p
Optimization of the water recovery levelThe boron problem
Pretreatment – MF, UF etc.Energy aspects
Concentrates Environmental23
Concentrates - EnvironmentalProcess optimization RDL GWRI Technion