Upload
phamdan
View
227
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Meeting Component Reliability Demands of the Aerospace Industry -Experiences and Recommendations
Gianluca AndreiHead of Gearbox System Engineering
Aarhus, October 6th, 2009
Oct. 6th, 2009 2© Avio SpA - 2009
One of Our Gearboxes vs. Typical Wind Turbine Gearbox
1.5 MWatt
Speed IncreaserAround 2 MWattAround 106 kNm Input TorqueAround 2000 mm Dimension
Speed ReducerAround 8 MWattAround 105 kNm Output TorqueAround 1000 mm Dimension
Oct. 6th, 2009 3© Avio SpA - 2009
Table of Contents
• Avio Overview and Gearbox Products
• Airworthiness and Reliability demands in Aeronautics and flow down in Avio Phase and Gate Process
• Gearbox Reliability Data and MaintenanceApproach
• Our Approach to achieve Reliability Targets:– Architecture, system, methodologies, technologies,
validation
Oct. 6th, 2009 4© Avio SpA - 2009
Our Business Activities
Complete propulsion systemsand services
MILITARY EJ200
Space propulsion & Launchers(solid & liquid)SPACE
Civil aeroengine MROCIVILMR&O
CIVIL Modules and Componentsfor civil aviation aeroengines& aeroderivative engines
GEnx
Maintenance Vega
Oct. 6th, 2009 5© Avio SpA - 2009
Turbofans:• PW2000, PW4000, CF6-80, GE90,
V2500, TRENT 900, SaM146, GEnx 1B/2B
• RB199, EJ200, F119, F124-GA-200, F110, DFZI100
Turboshafts:• T700, T700/CT7-8/T6E1
Jet Derivative Engines:• LM2500, LM6000
• Drive for electrical, hydraulic, fuel, oil, etc accessories for engineand aircraft utilities & Drive forengine starting
• Power Range: up to 1 MWatt
Our Aeroengine Accessory Drive Trains
Avio Designed Products have cumulated successfullymore than 150 million flight hours in revenue service
Oct. 6th, 2009 6© Avio SpA - 2009
Power Gearbox (PGB) for Turboprop and Turboshaft:• PW150, PT6-36B, TP400-D6• Power Range up to 8 MWatt
Our Power Gearboxes
Reduction Gearbox Demos for Geared Fan Aeroengine:
• Power Range up to 30 MWatt
Helicopter Main Gearbox:• Dauphin (SA 365/EC 155), Puma
(SA330), Super Frelon (SA321)• Power Range up to 1 MWatt
GearboxGearbox
Oct. 6th, 2009 7© Avio SpA - 2009
Latest Development - TP400 D6 Power GearboxMain Features:
• Around 8 MW
• 2 PGB versions (LH & RH)
• System Design based on tuned flexibility to achieve low weight and reliability
• 1st red. Stage: Bi-Helical Gears
• 2nd red. Stage: Planetary System
• Integral Bearing Races
• Isotropic Superfinished gears
Main Achievements:
• Output Torque Density around 200 Nm/kg
• More than 2000 hours development and certification tests
Oct. 6th, 2009 8© Avio SpA - 2009
• Civil Aviation World is governed by the Convention on International Civil Aviation (commonly known as the Chicago Convention)
• The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), a specialized agency of the United Nations, sets the minimum Standards and Recommended Practices for international civil aviation
• Airworthiness Authority Agencies (EASA, FAA, …) were created:– to maintain a high level of safety and environmental protection in Civil Aviation
(primary mission)– to establish legislative and regulatory tasks– to issue Type Certificates for aeronautical products – to approve design, production and maintenance organizations (DOA, POA, MOA)
Civil Aviation World
Airworthiness is the termused to dictate whether anaircraft is worthy of safeflight
Oct. 6th, 2009 9© Avio SpA - 2009
ETOPS has set new standards for Aeroengine Reliability
Early ETOPS:
• provides ETOPS type design certification without any previous service experience
•The reliability plan must be defined and strictly followed throughout the NPI process
ETOPS:
• is an acronym for Extended-range Twin-engine Operation
• ETOPS allows a twin engine commercial passenger aircraft to be at any time a certain number of flying minutes away from a suitable diversion landing field
80s 90s 2000s
ET
OP
S di
vers
ion
time
(min
utes
)
75
150
225
300
Early ETOPS
ETOPS Diversion Time
In F
light
Shu
tDow
n R
ate
80s 90s 2000s70s
180 min. ETOPS IFSD rate < 0.02/1000 flight hour
Current Typical Turbofan IFSD rate < 0.005/1000 flight hours (i.e. anengine fails in flight once every > 60 years)
Improvement in Aeroengine Reliability by a factor > 10 in the the last 30 years
Oct. 6th, 2009 10© Avio SpA - 2009
Identify Product RequirementsIdentify Product Requirements
Customer Spec., Agency Specs
Translate to Technical Requirements& Flowdown to Components
Translate to Technical Requirements& Flowdown to Components
Design Specification, QFD, Risk Assessment -> Key Requirements Flowdown, Component Specifications, Validation Plans
Design Product, Assess AgainstTargets & Make Trades
Design Product, Assess AgainstTargets & Make Trades
FMEA, PFMEA, Lessons Learned, Design Practices, DFSS, Maintainability Analysis
Validate Customer & AirworthinessRequirements are satisfied
Validate Customer & AirworthinessRequirements are satisfied
Design Review, Substantiation, Testing and Manufacturing Capability
Monitor Field Performance to Assure Customer Requirements are satisfied
Monitor Field Performance to Assure Customer Requirements are satisfied
Observed Reliability, Weibull, IFSD, MTBUR
Problem Tracking
and Resolution
Problem Tracking
and Resolution
FRACAS (Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective
Action System)
NPI process: Phase and Gate Process to achieve Reliability
Achieve Type Design Certification and Production Readiness
Achieve Type Design Certification and Production Readiness
Continued AirworthinessContinued Airworthiness
Failure, Malfunction & Defect Mangement, Engineering Change, Service Bulletin
Oct. 6th, 2009 11© Avio SpA - 2009
Gearbox Reliability Data and Maintenance ApproachM
TB
UR
[per
Mill
ion
Flig
ht H
ours
]
Gearbox TOW [per Thousands Flight Hours]
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
10
Aeroengine Accessory Drive Train
Turboprop PGB
20 30
Gearbox Mean Time Between Unscheduled Removal (MTBUR) vs. Average Time On Wing (TOW)
(Typical)
Typical Maintenance approach: • On Condition• Condition Monitoring:
• Oil Content • Oil Debris Monitoring • Oil Filter Blockage• Oil Feed Pressure and
Temperature• Higher failure rate components are
allowed to be replaced On Wing (e.g. accessories, dynamic seals….)
• Line Replaceable Units (LRUs)
Corresponds to a single PGB UnscheduledRemoval every more than200 years (yearly usagerate about 2000 hours)
Corresponds to a single Gearbox UnscheduledRemoval every more than1000 years (yearly usage rate about 2000 hours)
Accessory Drive Train Reliability betterthan PGB for several reasons, e.g. lower
torque density, different usage spectrum,..
Oct. 6th, 2009 12© Avio SpA - 2009
Characteristics of Our Gearboxes
Technologies:
•Advanced Gears Technologies
•High Load Capacity bearings (rolling and journal bearings)
•Integral bearing races
•HUMS
Design Methodologies (System and Components):
•Whole System Modeling (CAD/CAE)
•System Dynamics
•Advanced Gears Design Methods
Architecture:
•Design based on Tuned Flexibility to achieve even Load / Torque share
•Design based on low parts count
Oct. 6th, 2009 13© Avio SpA - 2009
Architecture approach based on Tuned Flexibility
Even Split of Torque into two paths
Even Load Share and Control of Misalignments in Planetary Systems
Oct. 6th, 2009 14© Avio SpA - 2009
Planetary System Load Sharing Factor - DFSS analysis
• Developed proprietary methodologyto simulate planetary systems
– Simplified and fast methodology allowinganalysis of 106 cases in less than 10’
– Analysis of effects of architecture and boundary conditions on failure probability
– Analysis of effects of tolerances andmanufacturing errors on failure probability
Mean increase (%) of planet load as function of support stiffness
Each point: mean value from 50000random errors combination (tolerances and assembly)
Planet gear failure probability as function of support stiffness
Load cases
Material strengthPlanet Stress
Nominal planet stressMean planet stress
Oct. 6th, 2009 15© Avio SpA - 2009
Propshaft and relevant supports are designed to maintain allowedmisalignments on gears and bearings
Tuning of System Flexibility
Whole Gearbox Modelling
PGB System deflection - plot
(magnified)
Oct. 6th, 2009 16© Avio SpA - 2009
AVIO approach for transient torsional dynamic analysis allows non-linear simulation of the entire transmission system
This methodology:has been key to support the design of a high power Accessory Drive Trainhas allowed to simulate dynamic transients due to large generators torque fluctuations and failures
Fair match between analytical and experimental data was achieved
System Dynamics - Torsional Dynamic Modelling
Transient Torque
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1,7 1,8 1,9 2 2,1
secN
m
Experimental
Analytical
Transmission model Test results vs analysis (torque vs. time)
Avio Verification Test Rig
Oct. 6th, 2009 17© Avio SpA - 2009
AVIO developed and validated a state of the art analysis code for real stress of gear teethAll gear types are designed with true surface topography, tooth stiffness, etc.Allowable stress limits became independent of gear typeContact Pattern Optimized by DFSS approach
Conventional "stress index" does not show anomalies in helical gears contact…
Wear Area
New "true stress" analysis tools detects the edge contact enabling successful design
…but wear is actually experienced in service.
True stress analysis for unified gears modeling / analysis
Oct. 6th, 2009 18© Avio SpA - 2009
1 MW Power Circulating Gear Test RigSingle Tooth Bending Fatigue for gear material bending characterizationTwin disk machines for surface damage modeling and characterizationClosed loop test rig for HUMS algorithms calibration (vibes)
Power Circulating Rig
Testing Capabilities to Develop Gear Allowables
• Main tests: – Bending, Surface Fatigue,
Adhesive Wear Tests: – High Hot Hardness Steels – Surface finish (e.g. as ground and
Isotropic Superfinished)
Oct. 6th, 2009 19© Avio SpA - 2009
Integral Races technology: > 2000hrs flawless performance in TP400-D6 PGB
1,0
Failu
rePr
obab
ility
[%]
Pyrowear 53-Avio FinishPyrowear 53-Ra<0,08µmPyrowear 53-Ra=0,15µm
Pyrowear 53-Avio FinishPyrowear 53-Ra<0,08µmPyrowear 53-Ra=0,15µm
Lifing design data
Case Hardened and IsotropicSuperfinished Races in Gear Steels
Fatigue Tests (e.g. spall propagation)
INTEGRALRACES
High Load Capacity Bearings – Integral Races
Oct. 6th, 2009 20© Avio SpA - 2009
Transmission Development and Certification Tests
Avio Lube System Simulator
Avio Power Rig
Gearshaft holography
Fatigue test
Components Verification
Subsystems Verification
Module Verification
Transmission Certification
Engine Certification
Component Strength
• Oil System Sensitivity• Gearbox efficiency
• Load Sharing Factor• System Dynamics• Effect of aero loads• Heat to oil• Durability
Transmission Type Test (150hrs)
• Integration with engine systems
• Initial MaintenanceInspection Test (IMI)
• Flight Test Bed
Component Dynamics
Oct. 6th, 2009 21© Avio SpA - 2009
Health Monitoring for Transmission systems
Vibration algorithmsAccelerometers
Oil Debris Monitoring System
Bearing diagnostics
Gear diagnostics
Bearing diagnostics
Gear diagnostics
time
Pitting
Failure
Spalling Failure
Weardetection
Warning time
Dam
age
Prog
ress
ion
time
Pitting
Failure
Spalling Failure
Weardetection
Warning time
Dam
age
Prog
ress
ion
Oct. 6th, 2009 22© Avio SpA - 2009
Product Reliability - Recommendations
• New Products have to be managed by a Phase and Gate Process
• Design For Reliability should be part of this Phase and Gate Process
• Key Enablers of the Process are:o Clear understanding of Product Requirements and their flow
down to subsystems/componentso Product background (Architectures, Design Criteria and Lesson
Learned, Technologies, Manufacturing Capabilities and Field Data)
o Design and validation methodologies
Oct. 6th, 2009 23© Avio SpA - 2009
Acronyms• Block Test or Type Test: 150 hours endurance
certification test
• CTQ: Critical to Quality, key characteristic
• DFSS : Design For Six Sigma
• DOA : Design Organization Approval
• EASA: European Aviation Safety Agency
• ETOPS: Extended Twin Engines Operations, used to indicate Civil Airworthiness Authority approval to allow a twin engine commercial passenger aircraft to be at any time a certain number of flying minutes away from a suitable landing field.
• FAA: Federal Aviation Administration
• FMEA: Failure Malfunction and Effect Analysis, carried out at system and component level since concept design
• FRACAS : Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System is a mean to improve the product reliability during the development phase. To achieve this, FRACA is a closed-loop process that feeds back development experience into the product design. This process applies to development build, strip and test including flight test of engines, parts and accessories (including software) in support of the development of a product.
• HUMS: Health and Usage Monitoring System
• IFSD : In-Flight Shut Down
• IMI: Initial Maintenance Inspection test. This is a test that simulates the conditions in which the engine is expected to operate in service, including start stop cycles, to establish when the initial maintenance inspection is required. The test must be accomplished on an engine which substantially conforms to the type design.
• LH: Left Handed
• MOA : Maintenance Organization Approval
• MTBUR: Mean Time BeteweenUnscheduled Removal
• MRO: Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul
• NPI: New Product Introduction Process
• PGB: Power Gearbox
• PFMEA: Process Malfunction and Effect Analysis, carried out on manufacturing process to identify risks for component producibility.
• POA : Production Organization Approval
• QFD: Quality Function Deployment
• RH: Right Handed
• TOW: Time On Wing