15
M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

M/EEG forward problem& solutions

Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG courseJanuary 2011

C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

Page 2: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

Forward Problem

Inverse Problem

Source localisation in M/EEG

Page 3: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

Head anatomy

Solution by Maxwell’s equations

Head model : conductivity layoutSource model : current dipole

Forward problem

Page 4: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

tE

jB

tB

E

B

E

0Ohm’s law :

Continuity equation :

Ej

tj

Maxwell’s equations (1873)

Page 5: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

From Maxwell’s equations find:

where M are the measurements and f(.) depends on:•signal recorded, EEG or MEG•head model, i.e. conductivity layout adopted•source location•source orientation &

amplitude

Solving the forward problem

Page 6: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

From Maxwell’s equations find:

with f(.) as•an analytical solution

- highly symmetrical geometry, e.g. spheres, concentric spheres, etc.

- homogeneous isotropic conductivity•a numerical solution

- more general (but still limited!) head model

Solving the forward problem

Page 7: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

Con’s:•Human head is not spherical •Conductivity is not homogeneous and isotropic.

Analytical solution

Example: 3 concentric spheres

Pro’s:•Simple model•Exact mathematical solution•Fast calculation

Page 8: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

Overlapping spheres in MEG

Better but…

Page 9: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

Usually “Boundary Element Method” (BEM) :• Concentric sub-volumes of homogeneous and

isotropic conductivity,• Estimate values on the interfaces.

Numerical solution

Pro’s:•More exact head shape

modellingCon’s:•Mathematical approximations of solution numerical errors•Slow and intensive calculation

Page 10: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

Features of forward solution

Find forward solution (any):

with f(.)•linear in

•non-linear in

If source location is fixed, then

Page 11: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

SPM solutions

Source space & head model•Template Cortical Surface (TCS), in MNI space.•Canonical Cortical Surface (CCS) = TCS warped to subject’s anatomy•Subject’s Cortical Surface (SCS) = extracted from subject’s own structural image (BrainVisa/FreeSurfer)

Page 12: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

SPM solutions

Jérémie Mattout, Richard N. Henson, and Karl J. Friston, 2007, Canonical Source Reconstruction for MEG

Page 13: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

SPM solutions

Source space & head model•Template Cortical Surface (TCS), in MNI space.•Canonical Cortical Surface (CCS) = TCS warped to subject’s anatomy•Subject’s Cortical Surface (SCS) = extracted from subject’s own structural image (BrainVisa/FreeSurfer)

Forward solutions:•Single sphere•Overlapping spheres•Concentric spheres•BEM •… (new things get added to SPM & FieldTrip)

Page 14: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

Solving the Forward Problem is not exciting but necessary…

Solution depends on data at hand:•MEG vs. EEG:

single sphere or overlapping spheres vs. 3 concentric spheres or BEM

•Structural image available?CCS (good enough) or SCS (tedious work) vs. TCS (best proxy)

•Sensor location/head position available?

Conclusions

Page 15: M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

Thank you for your attention