1
814 Medicine and the Law Prosecution for Alleged Abortion , THE trial of two women doctors and a receptionist on charges of using an instrument to procure the mis- carriage of women patients ended at the Old Bailey last week in the discharge of all three of the accused. Mr. Anthony Hawke, in opening the case for the Crown, explained that operations of this kind, though generally unlawful, are not unlawful if performed for the purpose of preserving the life of the mother. Dr. B., who was said to have illegally used an instrument in the case of four women, had in two of these cases referred the patient first to Dr. F., the other accused doctor. Dr. F., it was said, sent the two patients back to Dr. B. with a certificate that, for reasons indicated, the operation could lawfully be performed. One of the patients, called as a witness for the prosecution, stated in cross-examination that there was haemophilia in her family and that she told Dr. F. that she had an overwhelming fear of dying in childbirth. The man who was responsible for her condition had two children, one deformed and the other " very peculiar." Dr. B., giving evidence, described the reasons for the operations. In one case there was no pregnancy and she had operated for a quite different condition. The case against Mrs. E., the receptionist; was that she had assisted Dr. B. in the operations on the four women ; it was said that she had received extra pay for this work. The judge ruled that there was not sufficient evidence against Mrs. E. to justify leaving her case to the jury ; the prosecution would have to prove that she knew she was taking part in something unlawful ; in his view there was no evidence fit to sustain that charge. Dr. F., who was charged in respect of two women patients, denied the allegations and gave her reasons for advising or taking part in the various operations. The prosecution drew attention to certain circum- stances of suspicion. Dr. B. had performed four opera- tions on pregnant women within five weeks. She had herself said that she had sent " between five and twenty " patients to Dr. F. for her opinion ; most of these consultations were on the desirability of terminating pregnancy. One witness said that she was asked to bring Dr. B. a fee of £75 in £1 notes. Dr. B. was questioned about her books which she said she had burned. "What are you going to do in the future," queried Mr. Hawke, " if a woman asks you to terminate a pregnancy ? Would you lay the patient on a couch in your surgery and operate with an unskilled assistant standing by ? " She replied " I would." The jury found both doctors " Not guilty." Leukaemia and War Service Mr. Justice Denning’s judgment in Kinkaid v. Minister of Pensions, reported in the Times of May 8, is almost a medical treatise on the doubtful origin of leukaemia. A man died from monocytic leukaemia while still serving in the Army. His dependants were therefore entitled to a war pension unless the Ministry could prove that the illness was neither attributable to, nor aggravated by, war service. In rare cases a war pension has been awarded for a death from cancer. There was the case of Captain Jones who, from a strong sense of duty, refused to report sick although obviously overworked and seriously ill; when at length he was taken to hospital, an inoperable growth was discovered ; taking the view that the patient’s zeal in remaining at duty was " reason- able " and that the delay in diagnosis and possible treatment had aggravated the illness, the court awarded a war pension to the widow. There have been other awards of pension in cancer cases where there was not enough evidence for the Ministry to discharge its obliga- tion of proving non-attributability or non-aggravation or where the man concerned had been exposed to radio- active substances in his work. The result of the expert medical evidence on which the Kinkaid judgment was founded is that the material facts in one leukaemia are usually indistinguishable from those in another, and that the consequences are the same. It follows that leukaemia is finally established for the purpose of war pensions claims as a disease not attributable to, or aggravated by, war service. Leukaemia, said Mr. Justice Denning, is cancer of the blood. A healthy man is suddenly struck down for no apparent cause and dies. The evidence of Sir Lionel Whitby indicated that the circumstances in which this disease arose or developed were the same as with other cancers. The court was furnished with an impressive report and statistics by Dr. Dixon, who explained that in the last nine months an international committee of experts had removed leukaemia from the classification of diseases of the blood-forming organs and had placed it among the malignant neoplasms. Dr. Dixon reported that, though the aetiology of leukaemia was unknown, experience, trial experiments, and statistics made it possible to state confidently that it was : " not caused or hastened by trauma (except in rare cases of intolerable exposure to radioactive substances), infection, diet, climate, exposure, physical and mental strain or stress. It is not infectious or contagious and is not con. veyed by eating or drinking contaminated food or drink. No previous illness predisposes to it." The conclusion from this expert testimony was that Mr. Kinkaid’s death from acute monocytic leukaemia, was due to natural causes and would have occurred at the same time had he never been in Army service. The onus of proof resting upon the Minister of Pensions had been discharged beyond all doubt, and this decision will dominate all future claims where death is due to leukaemia. Public Health Travel to the U.S.A. THE regulations of the United States Public Health Service require that each person entering the U.S.A. shall present a smallpox vaccination certificate showing that vaccination has been done not more than three years before arrival, and including a note on the reaction observed. These regulations apply to all travellers, including Government officials and diplomatic officers. Failure to present a valid certificate renders the traveller liable to vaccination on arrival or a period of observa- tion (isolation). Travellers are advised to obtain an international form of certificate which, when completed, gives the information required by the U.S. authorities. Aircraft Regulations The Minister of Health announces (circular 74/48) that Eire is now included among the areas excepted from the terms of the Public Health (Aircraft) Regulations, 1948.1 Appointments ENSOR, G. F., M.R.c.s., D.o.M.s. : asst. county nt.o. for ophthalmic work, Essex. HAY, C. P., M.D. Edin., M.R.c.p.E.. D.P.H. : asst. senior M.O., East Anglian regional hospital board. HILL, J. L., M.B. Belf., D.P.H. : asst. county M.o. and M.o.H., Eton rural and urban districts. LowE, J. J. H., M.D. Durh., M.R.C.P.. D.P.M. : regional psychiatrist, Leeds regional hospital board (region 2). Ftossow, H. E., M.B. Durh. : orthopsedic surgical registrar, Hartle’ pools Hospital. Ro&ERS, K. B., M.B. Lond.: clinical pathologist, Children’s Hospital, Birmingham. London County Council Mental Health Services: Asst. M.O.’s : .- DONNELLY, JOHN, M.B. Lpool : -Cane Hill Hospital. ENGLER, MARKUS, M.D. Vienna : St. Lawrence’s Hospital. HUGHES, A. L., M.B. Aberd. : The Manor. KRAMBACH, REINHARD, M.D. Leipzig, D.P.M. : Claybury Hospital. KRUGER, JoHAN, M.D., B.SC. Amsterdam, M.R.C.O.G. : Banstead Hospital. RICH, E. J., L.M.S.S.A. : Claybury Hospital. RoBixsoN, H. H., B.A., M.B. Dubl. : St. Ebba’s Hospital. SILVESTER, T. ST. J. H., M.R.C.S. : Bexley Hospital. Joyce Green Hospital, Dartford: First assistan,ts in neurosurgical unit : NORTHCROFT, G. B., M.R.C.S. MCCAUL, 1. R., M.B. Glasg. 1. Lancet, March 13, p. 429.

Medicine and the Law

  • Upload
    vanminh

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Medicine and the Law

814

Medicine and the Law

Prosecution for Alleged Abortion ,THE trial of two women doctors and a receptionist

on charges of using an instrument to procure the mis-carriage of women patients ended at the Old Baileylast week in the discharge of all three of the accused.Mr. Anthony Hawke, in opening the case for the Crown,explained that operations of this kind, though generallyunlawful, are not unlawful if performed for the purposeof preserving the life of the mother. Dr. B., who wassaid to have illegally used an instrument in the case offour women, had in two of these cases referred the patientfirst to Dr. F., the other accused doctor. Dr. F., it wassaid, sent the two patients back to Dr. B. with a certificatethat, for reasons indicated, the operation could lawfullybe performed. One of the patients, called as a witnessfor the prosecution, stated in cross-examination thatthere was haemophilia in her family and that she toldDr. F. that she had an overwhelming fear of dyingin childbirth. The man who was responsible for hercondition had two children, one deformed and the other" very peculiar." Dr. B., giving evidence, describedthe reasons for the operations. In one case there wasno pregnancy and she had operated for a quite differentcondition.The case against Mrs. E., the receptionist; was that

she had assisted Dr. B. in the operations on the fourwomen ; it was said that she had received extra payfor this work. The judge ruled that there was notsufficient evidence against Mrs. E. to justify leaving hercase to the jury ; the prosecution would have to provethat she knew she was taking part in something unlawful ;in his view there was no evidence fit to sustain thatcharge. -

Dr. F., who was charged in respect of two womenpatients, denied the allegations and gave her reasons foradvising or taking part in the various operations.The prosecution drew attention to certain circum-

stances of suspicion. Dr. B. had performed four opera-tions on pregnant women within five weeks. She hadherself said that she had sent " between five and twenty "patients to Dr. F. for her opinion ; most of theseconsultations were on the desirability of terminatingpregnancy. One witness said that she was asked tobring Dr. B. a fee of £75 in £1 notes. Dr. B. wasquestioned about her books which she said she hadburned. "What are you going to do in the future,"queried Mr. Hawke,

" if a woman asks you to terminatea pregnancy ? Would you lay the patient on a couchin your surgery and operate with an unskilled assistantstanding by ? " She replied " I would."The jury found both doctors " Not guilty."

Leukaemia and War Service

Mr. Justice Denning’s judgment in Kinkaid v. Ministerof Pensions, reported in the Times of May 8, is almosta medical treatise on the doubtful origin of leukaemia.A man died from monocytic leukaemia while still servingin the Army. His dependants were therefore entitledto a war pension unless the Ministry could prove that theillness was neither attributable to, nor aggravated by,war service. In rare cases a war pension has beenawarded for a death from cancer. There was the caseof Captain Jones who, from a strong sense of duty,refused to report sick although obviously overworked andseriously ill; when at length he was taken to hospital,an inoperable growth was discovered ; taking the viewthat the patient’s zeal in remaining at duty was " reason-able " and that the delay in diagnosis and possibletreatment had aggravated the illness, the court awardeda war pension to the widow. There have been otherawards of pension in cancer cases where there was notenough evidence for the Ministry to discharge its obliga-tion of proving non-attributability or non-aggravationor where the man concerned had been exposed to radio-active substances in his work. The result of the expertmedical evidence on which the Kinkaid judgmentwas founded is that the material facts in one leukaemiaare usually indistinguishable from those in another,and that the consequences are the same. It follows

that leukaemia is finally established for the purposeof war pensions claims as a disease not attributableto, or aggravated by, war service.

Leukaemia, said Mr. Justice Denning, is cancer of theblood. A healthy man is suddenly struck down forno apparent cause and dies. The evidence of Sir LionelWhitby indicated that the circumstances in which thisdisease arose or developed were the same as with othercancers. The court was furnished with an impressivereport and statistics by Dr. Dixon, who explainedthat in the last nine months an international committeeof experts had removed leukaemia from the classificationof diseases of the blood-forming organs and had placedit among the malignant neoplasms. Dr. Dixon reportedthat, though the aetiology of leukaemia was unknown,experience, trial experiments, and statistics made itpossible to state confidently that it was :

" not caused or hastened by trauma (except in rare casesof intolerable exposure to radioactive substances), infection,diet, climate, exposure, physical and mental strain or

stress. It is not infectious or contagious and is not con.veyed by eating or drinking contaminated food or drink.No previous illness predisposes to it."The conclusion from this expert testimony was that

Mr. Kinkaid’s death from acute monocytic leukaemia,was due to natural causes and would have occurred atthe same time had he never been in Army service. Theonus of proof resting upon the Minister of Pensionshad been discharged beyond all doubt, and this decisionwill dominate all future claims where death is due toleukaemia.

Public Health

Travel to the U.S.A.

THE regulations of the United States Public HealthService require that each person entering the U.S.A.shall present a smallpox vaccination certificate showingthat vaccination has been done not more than threeyears before arrival, and including a note on the reactionobserved. These regulations apply to all travellers,including Government officials and diplomatic officers.Failure to present a valid certificate renders the travellerliable to vaccination on arrival or a period of observa-tion (isolation). Travellers are advised to obtain aninternational form of certificate which, when completed,gives the information required by the U.S. authorities.

Aircraft RegulationsThe Minister of Health announces (circular 74/48)

that Eire is now included among the areas exceptedfrom the terms of the Public Health (Aircraft)Regulations, 1948.1

AppointmentsENSOR, G. F., M.R.c.s., D.o.M.s. : asst. county nt.o. for ophthalmic

work, Essex.HAY, C. P., M.D. Edin., M.R.c.p.E.. D.P.H. : asst. senior M.O., East

Anglian regional hospital board.HILL, J. L., M.B. Belf., D.P.H. : asst. county M.o. and M.o.H., Eton

rural and urban districts.LowE, J. J. H., M.D. Durh., M.R.C.P.. D.P.M. : regional psychiatrist,

Leeds regional hospital board (region 2).Ftossow, H. E., M.B. Durh. : orthopsedic surgical registrar, Hartle’

pools Hospital.Ro&ERS, K. B., M.B. Lond.: clinical pathologist, Children’s Hospital,

Birmingham. ’

London County Council Mental Health Services:Asst. M.O.’s :.-DONNELLY, JOHN, M.B. Lpool : -Cane Hill Hospital.ENGLER, MARKUS, M.D. Vienna : St. Lawrence’s Hospital.HUGHES, A. L., M.B. Aberd. : The Manor.KRAMBACH, REINHARD, M.D. Leipzig, D.P.M. : Claybury Hospital.KRUGER, JoHAN, M.D., B.SC. Amsterdam, M.R.C.O.G. : Banstead

Hospital.RICH, E. J., L.M.S.S.A. : Claybury Hospital.RoBixsoN, H. H., B.A., M.B. Dubl. : St. Ebba’s Hospital.SILVESTER, T. ST. J. H., M.R.C.S. : Bexley Hospital.

Joyce Green Hospital, Dartford:First assistan,ts in neurosurgical unit :

NORTHCROFT, G. B., M.R.C.S.MCCAUL, 1. R., M.B. Glasg.

1. Lancet, March 13, p. 429.