Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Medical expenditure in Japan: an analysis with administrative data from a Citizen’s Health Insurance
plan
Yoko Ibuka, Tohoku University Stacey Chen, Academia Sinica
1
Medical Spending across Developed World Institute for Fiscal Studies March 27 & 28 2015
Overview
1. Institutional Background 2. Basic trend in healthcare expenditure 3. Medical expenditure with data from a Citizen’s Health
Insurance plan
2
INSTITUTIONAL BACKGROUND : JAPANESE HEALTH INSURANCE SYSTEM
3
Overview
• The national universal health insurance program(the national
health insurance, NHI) started in 1961 – The first government-‐involved health insurance was
introduced in 1922 and gradually expanded in both its eligibilities and benefits
• There are about 3500 plans – Having different risk structures and financial status – Roughly half employee-‐based and half community-‐based
4
Healthcare financing
• Insurance Premiums: 48.6% ( in 2011) – Employee-‐based plans
A set percentage of wages, with the employer contributing at least half (55% on average)
– Community-‐based plans Each municipality has its own method of setting contributions, which are roughly based half on income (sometimes also assets), and half on a flat amount per enrollee (sometimes also per household)
• Subsidies: 38.4% – Subsidies from the government – Cross-‐subsidizations across health insurance plans exist
• Patients’ out of pocket: 12.3%
5
Money flows in payment system
6
Patients
Insurers
Review & Reimburse
ment Services
Healthcare Providers
Coinsurance
Medical claim bills
Medical claim bills after review
Health insurance premium
Source: Ministry of Finance, Labour and Welfare, Japanese Health Insurance System http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/iryouhoken/iryouhoken01/index.html
Medical care services
Payment for services Payment for bills
Health insurers 1
• Individuals have no choice of plans
– All aged 75 years or above are covered by Late Elders’ Health Insurance (LEHI)
– Employers have to enroll their employees: Society-‐Managed Health Insurance (SMHI) and National Health Insurance Associations (NHIA)
– Dependents (except those older than 75 years) are covered by the plan of the head of the household
– All others are covered by Citizen’s Health Insurance (CHI)
7
Employee-based insurance
Community-based insurance
SMHI Society-managed Health Insurance
NHIA National Health Insurance Associations
CHI Citizen's Health Insurance
LEHI Late Elders’ Health Insurance
Eligibility Employees at large firms, government officers, their dependents
Employees at small and medium enterprises, their dependents
Self-employed, part-time workers, those retired
All aged 75 years or older
Enrollment (thousand) 31,000 35,000 38,000 16,000 (proportion) 26% 29% 32% 13% Number of health plans 1500 1 1900 47 Medical spending
(proportion) 15% 15% 29% 41%
Health insurers 2
8
Source: Ministry of Finance, Labour and Welfare, Japanese Health Insurance System (in Japanese)http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/iryouhoken/iryouhoken01/index.html
Insurance benefits
• Services covered include prescription drugs and dentistry • Single fee schedule is applied to all plans
– The government committee revises the fee schedule every two years
• Coinsurance are age-‐dependent and the same across plans • Extra coverage for catastrophic expenses: those with
monthly out-‐of-‐pocket payment of 40,000 JPY (=400 USD) for 70+ and 80,100 JPY (= 810 USD) for those under 70 – For many, 1% coinsurance for medical costs above the payment values
– Can be more or less generous depending on income level
9
Coinsurance as of 2015
10
Age Those with income above a threshold
value*
All other
75 or over 30%** 10%
70 - 75 20%§
6 - 70 30%
0 - 6 20%
* Monthly salary earnings excluding bonus payments more than 280 thousand JPY. Adjustments are made for those who have income other than salary. ** 20% until October 2006 § 10% until April 2014
Other financial sources for medical care for patients
• Municipal government can provide subsidies for medical care for infants and children to reduce out-‐of-‐pocket payment – Eligibility and coverage are determined by each municipal government
• Some purchase a voluntary private health insurance on top of the NHI
• Both are independent of the NHI and individuals who qualify the subsidies or who purchase insurance receive reimbursement after they make payment – They do not appear as the source of medical spending in
NHI statistics and counted as a part of out-‐of-‐pocket payment
11
Long-term care insurance
• Long-‐term care insurance (LTCI) started in 2000 • The insurance is independent of NHI • Spending for long-‐term care accounts for 7.7% of the total
social security payment while spending for medical care accounts for 32.1% in 2011
12
BASIC TREND IN HEALTHCARE EXPENDITURE: NATIONAL STATISTICS
13
Per capita medical spending and medical spending as percentage of
GDP, 1960-2012
14
2.45
3.45
4.45
5.45
6.45
7.45
8.45
9.45
262
762
1262
1762
2262
2762
3262
3762 19
60
1963
1966
1969
1972
1975
1978
1981
1984
1987
1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
2005
2008
2011
(%)
Spe
ndin
g pe
r per
son(
2010
US
D)
Year
Spending per person in 2010 USD Percent of GDP
Per capita medical spending by age group population vs. study sample
all
15
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
0~9 10~19 20~29 30~39 40~49 50~59 60~69 70~79 80 or beyond
2010
US
dolla
r
Age ( years)
2000
2010
2012
Sample
Note: Medical spending in 2000, 2010 and 2012 are from the national statistics.
Per capita medical spending by age group population vs. study sample
Men
16
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
0~9 10~19 20~29 30~39 40~49 50~59 60~69 70~79 80 or beyond
2010
US
dolla
r
Age (years)
2010
2012
Sample
Note: Medical spending in 2000, 2010 and 2012 are from the national statistics.
Per capita medical spending by age group population vs. study sample
Women
17
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0~9 10~19 20~29 30~39 40~49 50~59 60~69 70~79 80 or beyond
2010
US
dolla
r
Age (years)
2010
2012
Sample
Note: Medical spending in 2000, 2010 and 2012 are from the national statistics.
Share of medical spending, by source of funding, 1960-2012
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
100
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2012
(%)
Central govt Local govt Employers & Insurers Insured Out-of-pocket Other
18
Share of medical spending, by the type of care, 1970-2012
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2012
(%)
Inpatient care Outpatient care Dental care Prescription drugs Other
Note: Prescription drugs are included as a part of outpatient care in 1970. 19
MEDICAL SPENDING WITH DATA FROM A CITIZEN’S HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN
20
Study sample 1
21
• Study period: 2006-‐2011 • Coverage: All CHI beneficiaries who resides in city X during the
sample period • Medical claim records are obtained from a CHI plan of municipality
X in the north-‐east region of Japan – All medical claim records during the sample period are
compiled into the individual level and summed over 12 months to produce a yearly panel dataset on medical spending
– The dataset is matched with the list of all beneficiaries and thus it includes those who did not seek for care
• The panel data on medical spending is merged with household income data from tax records
Study sample 2
• Medical spending – Include:
Inpatient and outpatient services, prescription medicine, dental care
– Exclude: • long term care, over-‐the-‐counter drugs • A part of out-‐of-‐pocket expenditure may be
reimbursed by voluntary private health insurance or municipal-‐level government subsidies (for children)
• Year is defined as the fiscal year (April to March next year)
22
Discontinuity in eligibility
• In April 2008, the late elders’ health insurance (LEHI) was
introduced • Data includes only those under 75 after 2008
23
Age 2006, 2007 2008-‐2011 0-‐74 CHI CHI 75 + CHI LEHI
Comparison 1: Mean expenditure Population, CHI(all), CHI(City X)
24
Note: CHI covered all the age group until 2008, and only individuals aged under 75 years as the Late Elders’ Health Insurance started in 2008.
Population CHI, all CHI, city X
Enrollment Mean
expenditure Enrollment Mean
expenditure Enrollment Mean expenditure All <74 years >75 years
Thousand persons 2010 USD
Thousand persons 2010 USD
Thousand persons 2010 USD 2010 USD 2010 USD
2006 127,747 2,937 51,268 2,811 12.71 6,217 4,441 11,020 2007 127,687 3,023 50,724 2,984 13.12 6,145 4,273 11,003 2008 127,566 3,036 39,492 3,036 9.69 3,728 3,728 NA 2009 127,445 3,192 39,098 3,172 9.63 3,810 3,810 NA 2010 127,708 3,329 38,769 3,297 10.17 3,837 3,837 NA 2011 127,567 3,450 38,313 3,419 10.61 3,854 3,854 NA
Comparison 2: Age distribution Population, CHI(all), CHI(city X)
25
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Population (2011)
CHI (2011) CHI, City X (2009-2011)
CHI, City X (2006-2008)
(%)
80 or above 70-79 60-69 50-59 40-49 30-39 20-29 10-19 0-9
Medical spending, by payers (%)
26
Note: CHI covered all the age group until 2008, and only individuals aged under 75 years as the Late Elders’ Health Insurance started in 2008.
(A) All period
(B) 2006, 2007 (All age)
(C) 2008-2011 (Under 75)
All Men Women Out-of-pocket payment 21.9 22.7 21.1 National Health Insurance 78.2 76.9 78.9
All Men Women Out-of-pocket payment 16.8 17.4 16.2 National Health Insurance 83.1 82.8 83.6
All Men Women Out-of-pocket payment 27.5 28.2 26.8 National Health Insurance 72.5 71.8 73.1
27
Medical care spending, by type of care (%)
Note: CHI covered all the age group until 2008, and only individuals aged under 75 years as the Late Elders’ Health Insurance started in 2008.
All Men Women Medical care
Inpatient care 50.2 54.9 46.1 Outpatient care 26.8 25.6 27.8
Dental care 4.2 3.8 4.6 Prescription drugs 18.8 15.8 21.2
All Men Women Medical care
Inpatient care 55.1 59.7 51.4 Outpatient care 25.0 23.3 26.1
Dental care 3.3 3.0 3.5 Prescription drugs 16.8 13.9 18.9
All Men Women Medical care
Inpatient care 45.1 50.1 40.5 Outpatient care 28.9 27.6 29.9
Dental care 5.3 4.6 5.8 Prescription drugs 21.1 17.7 23.8
(A) All period
(B) 2006, 2007 (All age) (C) 2008-2011 (Under 75)
Concentration of spending
28
Spending Percentile
Percentage of the enrollees
Percentage of spending
Average spending per enrollee in 2010 USD)
Everyone 100% 100% 6,181 95%-100% 5% 46% 57,328 90-95% 5% 16% 20,369 70-90% 20% 23% 7,193 50-70% 20% 10% 2,998 0-50% 50% 4% 512
Spending Percentile
Percentage of the
enrollees
Percentage of spending
Average spending per enrollee in 2010 USD)
Everyone 100% 100% 3,809 95%-100% 5% 53% 40,637 90-95% 5% 12% 9,479 70-90% 20% 22% 4,128 50-70% 20% 9% 1,738 0-50% 50% 3% 259
Spending Percentile Percentage of the enrollees
Percentage of spending
Average spending per enrollee (in 2010
USD) Everyone 100% 100% 4,738 95%-100% 5% 51% 48,470 90-95% 5% 14% 13,491 70-90% 20% 22% 5,205 50-70% 20% 9% 2,156 0-50% 50% 4% 334
(B) 2006, 2007 (All age) (C) 2008-2011 (Under 75)
(A) All period
Mean income, by income quintile
29
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
Everyone Bottom Fourth Third Second Top
2010
US
dolla
r
All Men Women
Mean medical expenditure, by expenditure quintile
30
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
Everyone Bottom Fourth Third Second Top
2010
US
dolla
r
All Men Women
Mean medical expenditure, by income quintile
31
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Everyone Bo<om Fourth Third Second Top
2010 US do
llar
All
Men
Women
32
t t+1 t+2 All 1 0.58 0.49 Men 1 0.58 0.49 Women 1 0.57 0.49
t t+1 t+2 All 1 0.73 0.62 Men 1 0.76 0.67 Women 1 0.69 0.59
Correlation in medical spending, over time
(A) Spending in Levels
(B) Spending in Logs
Total medical expenditure transition matrix
33
Quintile Next year Current Year Bottom Fourth Third Second Top Bottom 60.4 26.9 8.2 2.3 2.1 Fourth 25.0 44.6 21.7 5.2 3.5 Third 7.7 24.3 40.0 21.2 6.8 Second 2.2 4.7 22.8 46.9 23.4 Top 5.0 2.6 6.4 22.1 63.9
Quintile Two years time Current Year Bottom Fourth Third Second Top Bottom 54.1 24.9 11.4 5.5 4.1 Fourth 27.5 38.8 20.3 8.4 5.0 Third 10.9 24.1 34.1 20.4 10.6 Second 3.9 5.4 19.1 43.2 28.4 Top 9.7 3.8 7.3 16.5 62.7
(A) One year transition
(B) Two year transition
Note: Panel A is produced with data limited to those who remained at least for three periods to keep consistency in sample in the two panels.
34
Total medical spending averaged over: 1 year 2 years 3 years Gini coefficient on medical spending 0.77 0.73 0.71 Percentage spent by top 1% of spenders 19% 17% 17% Percentage spent by top 10% of spenders 65% 61% 59%
Concentration over 1, 2, and 3 years
Average medical spending over 1, 2, and 3 years
35
0.2
.4.6
.81
100 500 1000 10000 100000 300000Average Medical Spending (2010 USD)
1 year 2 year 3 year
Prob
abilit
y
Identifying the last year of life 1
• The data does not show the reason why they left the CHI • Possible reasons
1. Death 2. Move to the Late Elders’ Health Insurance 3. Move to other health insurance plan
• Our Strategy 1. Identify those who left the CHI during the study period 2. We dropped those who moved to the Late Elders’ Health
Insurance based on the timing (in 2008 April) or their age (after April 2008)
3. We dropped those who left the CHI at the same timing as their dependents (i.e. those who are likely to change health insurance plan)
36
Identifying the last year of life 2
• Two types of errors 1. Those who are actually not dead are treated as the dead
• Individuals who changed a health insurance plan by him/herself alone, including those who are single, are treated as being dead
2. Those who are dead are treated as those alive • Individuals who died at the age of 75 are treated as those are alive
• Approximately 10% of the total sample fall in the definition of death
• Higher number compared to the mortality rate • Error 1 is more serious? à Underestimate of medical spending in
the last year of life
37
Medical spending in three groups
38
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
-36 -34 -32 -30 -28 -26 -24 -22 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2
2010
US
D
Months before the last month
Death Exit other No exit
Note: “Death” are defined in the way explained in the text. “Exit other” showed those who left the CHI for presumably different reasons other than death. “No exit” are those who remained CHI throughout the study period.
Medical spending in the last year of life
(A) Aggregate medical spending and mortality
39
Popoulation Over 65 population Personal Health Care Expenditure
Mean spending per person (2010 USD) 3,503 8,250 Aggregate spending (billions) 489 252
Mortality Deaths (millions) 1.19 1.07
Sources: Vital Statistics of Japan 2010 for the number of deaths; National Medical Care Expenditure 2010 for mean and aggregate spending.
Medical spending in the last year of life
40
(B) Medical spending in the last year of life
Note: The share of medical spending in the last year of life was calculated by multiplying the mean spending from the data by the number of deaths per year divided by the total medical spending. The number of deaths and total medical spending were from the national statistics. Hashimoto et al., 2010 does not include medical spending for dentistry.
All age Over 65
Last years of life from data
Mean spending ,
study sample
As a percentage of
aggregate spending
Mean spending,
study sample
As a percentage of aggregate
spending Hashimoto et al., 2010
Year of death 16,974 4.59 28,095 11.94 22,354 2nd to last 11,084 3.00 13,902 5.91 NA 3rd to last 9,338 2.53 11,853 5.04 NA Sum of last 3 years 37,396 10.12 53,850 22.88 NA
Cumulative spending in the last year of life
41
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000
Cum
ulat
ive
spen
ding
in
2010
US
D�
Concluding remarks • We demonstrated macro and micro structure of medical spending
using an administrative data from a Citizen’s Health Insurance plan in Japan
• The study sample – represents a greater proportion of those aged 60 years or above than
the population and the entire CHI – demonstrates consistent age-‐specific mean medical spending as the
national statistics – shows a greater average expenditure per person than the national
statistics, largely attributed to the age distribution of the sample • Medical spending is
– disproportionately distributed with top 5% individuals accounting for 50% of total spending
– not strongly associated with household income level – highly persistent overtime
• Medical spending in the last year of life shows concentration in the last years of life (although caution should be taken to interpret the results) 42
Acknowledgements
• We acknowledge financial support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science #24330097 (PI: Nobuyuki Izumida) and #26780168 (PI: Yoko Ibuka)
• We are grateful to Dr. Yui Otsu for discussion
43