Upload
duke-university-press
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
1/41
Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein, Editors
Media , erotics ,
and transnational asia
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
2/41
Meda, erotcs, and
transnatonal asa
Prma maar ad
Losa sch, ds.
Du Uvsty Pss
Duh d Lodo 2012
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
3/41
2012 Duke Univeity e
All igt eeve
inte in te Unite Stte f Aei n i-fee ppe
Typeet in Wnk by Teng Inftin Syte, In.
iby f Cnge Ctlging-in-ublitin Dt ppe n telt pinte pge f ti bk.
Chpter 3 originlly ppered s Zines nd Zones of Desire: Mss-Medited
ove, Ntionl Romne, nd Sexul Citizenship in Gay Indonesi, by TomBellt, Journal of Asian Studies, Vlue 63, Iue 2 (My 2004), 367402.
Cpyigt 2004 Aitin f Ain Stuie. Repinte wit te peiinf Cbige Univeity e.
Cpte 6 iginlly ppee Dngeu Deie: Televiin n Eti in
te Twentiet-Centuy Ini, by uni Mnkek,Journal of Asian Studies,Vlue 63, Iue 2 (My 2004), 40331. Cpyigt 2004 Aitin f AinStuie. Repinte wit te peiin f Cbige Univeity e.
Cpte 7 iginlly ppee Heln Beuty: Tnntinl nging nHng Aein Vie, by ui Sein,Journal of Asian Studies, Vlue 63,
Iue 2 (My 2004), 43363. Cpyigt 2004 Aitin f Ain Stuie. Re-pinte wit te peiin f Cbige Univeity e.
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
4/41
PUrnima mankekar ddcts ths boo to h
both ajt m (19552003) fo gg gst
th dyg of th lght.
LUia ein bs wth ths boo h gd
school thoy both, m oy (19601994):
You bllc d you ly loss to pushd
to go dp to sxulty studs.
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
5/41
contents
ix acowldgts
1 ntroducton mdtos d Tsdtos:
eotcs, oclty, d as
Prma maar ad Losa sch
33 chapter 1 Wywd eotcs: mdtg Qu Dspoc rtu
mar F. maaLasa
53 chapter 2 Fo You rdg Plsu: lf-lth (Ziwo Baojian)
ifoto Bjg th 1990s
Jdh Farqhar
75 chapter 3 Zs d Zos of Ds: mss-mdtd Lov,
ntol roc, d xul tzshp Gay idos
om oLLsorFF
111 chapter 4 ospodc mgs, igd Vtul outs,
d outotcs o th itt
coL cosaL
139 chapter 5 Flows btw th md d th lc: Dsg
Poducto d ocl Poducto Ub Bjg
r Yho ha
173 chapter 6 Dgous Dss: eotcs, Publc ultu, d idtty
Lt Twtth-tuy id
Prma maar
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
6/41
203 chapter 7 old Buty: Tstol Logg d og
ac Vdo
Losa sch
233 chapter 8 aoth kd of Lov? Dbtg oosxulty d
-x itcy though Tws d hs Fl rcpto
sara L. Frdma
267 chapter 9 Bo ud Wst eys: Th Poltcs d eotcs of th
Docuty Gz Born into Brothels
hahr dLL
297 chapter 10 ac Gshs d tl/st Ftss
a aLLso323 rfcs
357 otbutos
359 idx
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
7/41
acknowledgMents
As demi projets trnsform into olletive endevors, they beome
tuly pleuble n ewing. Ove te ye tt it tken t bing
ti pjet t fuitin, ny llegue, fien, n fily ebe ve
generously ontributed guidne, provotions, nd support. Our erliest
uing n eti, ei, n Ai eege f nueu el t n-
ferenes from whih developed lose friendship oupled with intensely
genetive intelletul ynegy tt gve ie t ti wk. At te e tie,u itent eege f te ugeny f te ads ii, wi
lle ny f u t tke tin un te plex, uneven inteply f
ening n ptie ineent in exulitie n eti.
We t begn peenting piee f te lletin t te Aitin f
Asin Studies nnul meetings in 2000, where we beneted from stute
ent f Ry n evel ebe f te uiene. Celine
e Siizu n Rlp itzinge enie u tinking by ntibut-
ing tei wn wk n eti n ei t tt venue. ui Sein nuni Mnkek peente ey t te C in Cultul Stuie
nfeene in Biing, U.K., in 2000. We e gteful t ebe f
tt uiene f tei uetin n feebk. Anne Allin n wene
Cen pvie tiulting itiue t pnel we gnize t te Aei-
n Antplgil Aitin eeting in 2000. Elie vein f te
pte by Bellt, Mnkek, n Sein wee publie in teJournal
of Asian Studies (2004, vlue 6, nube 3), wee we benete f ug-
getion from eitor Ann Wltner n te nonymou peer reviewer for te
junl. Ou eit t Duke Univeity e, Ken Wike, epitize
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
8/41
x aknWLeDGmenT
ptiene, entui, n g u tugut te pe f peping
te nuipt f publitin. We nnt tnk i enug f i up-
port nd guidne. Severl nonymous reviewers worked hrd on the in-
tegity f te vlue, etie even eviewing e tn ne. At Duke
Univeity e, te nuipt w epee tug te putinproce by Anitr Grile, Courtney Berger, Mny Erley, Je Brook, n
iz Sit. We e gteful t te f tei itne n iligene. inlly,
we tnk Stt Siley f ting u eule t te inex f
ti bk.
uni Mnkek wul like t knwlege te wk f Rzit
Div (Stnf Univeity) n eeti S (cLa). ei le e-
ings, bibliogrphi help, nd ssistne with literture reviews hve been
inipenble. ui Sein tnk Sin ee, ing-C K, n SntiSnug f tei itne wit ee n bibligpi eiting. Dil-
ln Mney pvie invluble bibligpi n tenil input in te
nl tge. Sevel f u tuent ve pvie tute enty, gen-
eu itiue, n w intelletul eie ve te ye. uni
Mnkek wie t tnk tuent in e Antplgil Appe t
Sexulity gute ein (-tugt wit Bb V) t Stnf Uni-
veity f tei ent n le eing f te intutin n e
ey. ui Sein i u inebte t te wie-nging pvtin fzen f unegute in e Citil Sexulitie le ve te ye.
Collegues t Rutgers nd Stnford s well s severl of our ontributors
oered rigorous redings nd ritique of the introdution. ouis Shein
tnk Cl Deen n vi Ge-ni, n uni Mnke-
kr is grteful to Brb Voss, Sylvi Yngisko, nd Akhil Gupt. Outside
Stnf, Anjli Anek been wneful intelut n pvie
invluble uggetin we evie u intutin. uni Mnkek
wul l like t expe e ppeitin f te wneful intelletul nplitil unity pvie by te Sut Ai Reing Gup in te Sn
ni By Ae, wi, ve te ye, nite f Anjli Anek,
Pol Bhett, Adity Behl, wrene Cohn, Vsudh Dlmi, Inderpl
Gewl, Akil Gupt, Sb M, Rk Ry, n Ry.
uni Mnkek i ptiully gteful t fien n llegue w
hve mde her trnsition from Stnford University to cLa so semless
n pleuble, epeilly Anui Bneji, Ali Be, uy Bun, Ge
Hng, Keit C, Bet Mnt, Slni Mtu, Ktleen MHug,
Amir Mufti, Dn Neumn, Arundhti Neumn, Chon Norieg, Sherry
Otne, Apn S, Mni Sit, Snjy Subny, Ti Tyl,
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
9/41
aknWLeDGmenT xi
n uliet Willi. Se wie t tnk te i f e tw eptent,
Ci ittletn, Ciny n, ne Hibyi, Bet Mnt, ini ing,
n enny Spe, f tei unwveing uppt. Stuent t cLa, iey,
An Apg, Cle Cventy, Devk Gunwen, Veen Hppu,
Bin Hu, Nveen Mini, Stepnie Snt, eeti S, n Miii Til-lktne, ve ll been pleue t wk wit n ve pue e t l-
ify e intelletul guent in putive wy. Se knwlege wit
gtitue n etin te eve-wneful Sut Ain/Aein Stuie
Reing Gup niting f e f te tuent entine bve well
Diy Be, Cille zie, n Gin Sing f being e eing -
pnin. An e n neve tnk enug e witing pnin, ei
Cttelino, Lieb Fier, Hnn Lnecker, Abigil Sguy, n Juliet Willim
f tei w uppt n igu feebk tug ll e witing en-ev. t but nt let, te t in e tw eptent, Stey Hie,
Snt Hgn, Ri Men, enn Mille Vn- A, n eie Sing,
ve lwy been ineibly upptive n ve elpe e life t cLa un
tly.
We re deeply grteful to our uthors for their inredible endurne,
positive energy, hrd work, nd intelletul generosity, nd would like to
nte, wit ptiul ppeitin, te le eing n feebk pvie
by Anne Allin, T Bellt, n Mtin Mnlnn n te intu-tin. We wul l like t tnk Celine e Siizu f e intelle-
tul input n ntgiu entui in te ely tge f te peptin
f ti vlue, n expe eget tt e pte ul nt be inlue in
te nl nuipt. Mk iety n Rlp itzinge wee fellw tvele
t te initil tge in te pjet. Ou vlue i pe f u inbility t
inlue tei ntibutin.
Our fmilies hve provided invluble support. Purnim Mnkekr
wishes to express her ppreition to Akhil Gupt nd Kml Mnkekr
f tei lving uppt; wile Deey Sivni peene lwe wn
e ei putin, e l bugt ieuble jy, lugte,
n u-neee blne int e life. ui Sein i feve inebte t
Enie Ren f i enune n iniitble g u, n t Spi
Rend nd Ernesto Rend, who, longside this book, hve grown up nd
tue in tei pliti in ny wy.
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
10/41
i Prma maar ad Losa sch
Medatons and transMedatons
eotcs, oclty, d as
On nuy 18, 2007, te Inin gvenent bnne te tellite televiin
nnel a, unit f te Sny Entetinent Netwk, liing tt it
telest of the progrm Worlds Sexiest Advertisements ws likely to d-
veely et publi lity. Altug te bn w lifte n M 1, it
w nly ne f eie f ptet lune by te tte, plitil ptie,
nd ivi groups nxious bout how trnsntionl publi ulture ws l-legely ntinting Inin ultue. intne, in Apil 2007, wen te
Hllyw t Ri Gee kie te Bllyw te Silp Setty t
n ads wrene event in Deli, ngry mob repone by burning egie
f Gee n Setty f peing benity. Menwile, in Cin, Beijing
lw enfeent il t p ge in tee-ye e gint
wn w initite nue Intenet t uing e web n te
gun tt nue t wee nt ene in Cin pngpy
lws. But in the sme month, the Ministry of Publi Seurity lunhed
j ix-nt pign t puge pngpy f te Cinee Inte-
net, te vie inite f publi euity lleging tt te inw f pn-
grpic mteril from bro n lx ometic control [were] to blme for
te exiting pble in Cin ybepe.
ese bursts of outrge nd eorts t regultion do more thn signl
w ipute etii n bee ligtning f bttle ve ultul
utentiity. Ging beyn junliti li tt fetiize te pupte
initeent n epein f te exti Et (Wt bee f te ln
f te K Sut? ee te eline f First Posttile but te
Inin gvenent bn n a), tee intntitin f l pni ig-
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
11/41
2 mankekar anD ein
ligt te entwining f te pleue n nxietie uuning eti, i-
lity, n tnntinl ei.
In ti volume we engge te interection of trnntionl mei, erotic,
nd identity within Asi nd ross Asin dispors. e globl tr in
ige n text Ai n it ip i ly new penenn,nd it is not our intent to exeptionlize the present historil moment.
et it wul be itke t uneetite te nuentl nge in te
le n e f tnntinl ei ve te ue f te pt tee e-
e. e ei text we ve in ti vlue nge f igly teu
n gt f t pfeinl n glblly innt f. ey in-
lue ei u ine, i, tellite televiin, ppul nvel, n
elf elt litetue, well ei tt nt neeily iulte n
le, u vie, te Intenet, n zine. Ou et e ii-lly ultifiu, piing tuie f putin well uiene e-
eptin, ttening bt t litie f ei ue n t te e ineble
pe f ening-king.
We do not sribe singulr or totlizing power to trnsntionl medi
in te ntutin eping f eti. N we li tt eite
eti upplnt eple pi f. Inte, we e nene wit
w eite eti e bt ebee witin n ntitute ility t
te peent itil ent; tu, f intne, eite eti eftftin f e, l, n te t ew xe f il ineulity.
Going beyond pprohes to medi tht re reetionist (medi reet
wt i ging n in iety n ultue) beviit (ei et be-
vi in u-n-u nne), we exple te yi wy ei i-
plite gnitin, et, n te by t pbletize te bunie
between te pyi n te pel. Inee, eite eti et
well tublentive ntutin f te by n f pelity:
pulsting out of iPods, ikering ross television sreens nd omputer
nit, ting ittiu glne t u f billb, eite eti
ete eni n genete ptten f intiy tt nfun up-
tions bout propinquity nd distne, physility nd virtulity. rough
tei (ften intinuu) itineie egin n ntin, eite
eti enble f f et n eigine litie tt viuly tn-
ge n einibe innt ntin f unity n ientity. In plu-
rlity of ite, meite erotic prticipte in renewe form of plce-mking
troug bounry-croing n te reiction of culturl ierence; te e-
ie pwne by ei eti enble new e f pyil n igin-
tive tvel f ignt n f nue f glblize ppul ultue.
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
12/41
inTrDUTin 3
Previling oneptions of Asi onjure n erotiized spe formed
troug eire n nxietie embee in te Wetern gze. Convention
f etiizing Ai k bk t te iue nile in Siin Oien-
tli (1980) n peit int te uent e, in wi Ain bie e in
for iproportionte porn repreenttion online, pulling in tggering 25 to30 peent f evenue in ultibillin-ll inuty (Tu 2003, 267). We
w ttentin t w Ai n Ain ip ve bee ite f te
putin f ultipliity f ei text tt iulte n tnntinl
le, u exully expliit pnee ng, pngpy, vie, Blly-
w ine, bing pint inuty f zine, uenty n tvel
video, mgzines, novels, nd stellite television. As these medited texts
tvel ieent ultul ntext tey ptiipte, gnilly n
funtinlly, in te ntutin f ptiul kin f pe n tep-litie. Hw ten ntepy eblge f ei n eti en-
ble te engutin f Ai itelf?
Our book resontes with the ontinuing importneperhps the re-
ugenef Ai n ny iuive n plitil egite. ee i little
ubt tt u f te iue n iing eeging Ai i ei-
te by te inteet f glblize pitl ( in te exiteent uuning
eeging ket) n te ipetive n nxietie f U.S. n Eupen
ipeil inteet. (Ai, fte ll, i ite wee te w n te beenwge.) Ou bjetive i t fegun te ntepy engutin f
Ai tug it intenifying entlity t iuit f tnntinl ultul
t. In u neptin, Ai eege n untble ignie well
plipet f iepnt genelgie, teplitie, n itie.
Ou nlye eet te ptil engutin pue by igtin,
te peegintin f tnntinl ei, n te glbl t in pitl
n itie. ee nlye inlue tuie f zine ng ipee
gay n lesbi unitie Innei, tveling tle f eti liinbetween Weten en n pnee wen n en, te fging f vitul
unitie f intiy n lnging between Eupen Aein en
n ilipin n Cinee wen, n intentinlly elebte uen-
ty tt iulte te ty f Inin ilen ptgping tei live,
nd video evotions of the nostlgi fntsies of Hmong Amerin men
but eln wen. Ou pp i nt t pile e tuie
of dierent instntitions of erotis in distint eld sites. Insted, while
upululy peeving te ultul, plitil, n itil peiitie f
eh of these onjuntures, these hpters, tken s whole, onstrut
tnntinl nlyti (Gewl, Gupt, n Ong 1999) by epeenting te
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
13/41
4 mankekar anD ein
intinuu, nntelelgil, yet unitkble, nge uing
ivee ei-tute ultul lnpe tugut Ai n it i-
p.
Trnsntionl medi onstitute omplex reltionships between eroti
yening n te eie n fntie. Ou fu i n uil ien-sion of wht hs been lled the soil prtie (Ginsburg, Abu- ughod,
n kin 2002) f tnntinl ei: it ntitutive le in te el
f eti. e il ltin f pue n nue, te pliti f
enunition refrting the diverse modes of ddress deployed by spei
gene f ei, te ntive epetie n wi ei text w, n
the semioti skills of udienes nd onsumers ruilly inet medited
erotis. At the sme time, however, shrp disontinuities might exist be-
tween util intentin n te intepetive negtitin f uiene,reders, nd onsumers. We explore the intertextulities tht refrt the
myrid menings tht medi texts quire s they beome sites of inti-
te bittin f ubjet living in pei itil n ultul ilieu
(Mnkek 2005).
We lte eti in te f it ibitin wit te eie n p-
ee f ubjet ftin. Eti eie, f tt tte, eti evul-
inunubtely pe bevi n il ptie, even in te in-
tne wee it i nt vetly nifet. A Anne Allin pint ut, Deiei bt f n beyn te eveyy . . . eie i eting tt egue bt
int n ut f te elitie f eveyy life (1996, xiii). If, in teetil
frmework inuence by Freu n Lcn, eire i by enition untible
(n te ipibility f tifying eie, ee eu 1961 n n 1977; ee
l iek 1989), ten t wt en i eie tively inite n utine by
ei in njuntin wit te il intitutin u te tte, tu-
tue f fily n kinip, n te en f lb n pitl (uult
1985; Stle 1995; ee l Allin 1996, xv)? Hw, f exple, e eti e-ie pue by ei tiulte wit te eie f itie (Hug
1986; ee l Cuti 2004, n Mnkek, ti vlue), fue wit ntlgi
f te eln, inepble f lnging f enity?
Mi ti s
Sholrs hve long pointed to how the expnsion of trnsntionl medi
eulte in te etin f new unitin gegpy (Mley
n Rbin 1995, 1) n in elignent f ll/glbl eltin (Ang 1996;
Appui 1996; Gupt n egun 1997; Hnnez 1996; Mnkek 2005;
Mley 1992). A Dvi Mley n Kevin Rbin pint ut, At te et
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
14/41
inTrDUTin 5
f tee itil evelpent i pe f ptil etutuing n e-
ngutin. . . . It invlve t ne tnftin f te ptil tix
f iety n f te ubjetive expeiene f, n ienttin t, pe n
ptility (1995, 26). Nt upiingly, lly n ppul iue n
trnsntionl medi re replete with tropes of sptility: onsider, for in-tne, te ubiuity f te like iuit, w, veent, tjetie,
trnsmission, hnnels, lol/globl, trnslol, regionl, trnsntionl,
trnsborder, borders, boundries, mobility, nd xity (see lso Mnkekr
2008). eizing te wk f tnntinl ei, ten, euie nep-
tul fewk infe by gegpi igintin (Mley n Rbin
1995, 26).
Jmes Cliords (1997) entrl metphor of routes is useful here for
ting te ptiulitie f ei bilitie. et te epi n fllw-ing ute ul nt be peitte t elie te funtining f pleitie,
regions, homelnds, nd so forths dynmi proesses, s ongeries of
il eltin (Mey 1993, 6667) tt e t ne ntitute n tn-
ete by ei. A T Bellt inigtfully pint ut in i nlyi
f tnntinl ei in Innei, A et f fgente ultul eleent
f ei i tnfe in unexpete wy in te Innein n-
text, tnfing tt ntext itelf in te pe (2003b, 41). Siilly,
it i ipible t neive f te eipe ete by tenlgie likete Intenet epte f te vitul unitie tey engene (ee
Cntble, ti vlue).
Trnsntionl medi refshion rtogrphies of desire keyed to geo-
gpil n vitul ple. intne, ei putin f te Wet
s ple of sexul freedom powerfully shpe the onstrution of sexul
normtivities in mny prts of the non-Western world (in this volume,
Bellt, Mnkek, n Eveett ueng Zng e nlye f tee
pee in Innei, Ini, n Cin, epetively). In u intne,rther thn homogenizing ulturl dierene, medi my entute
nd, on osion, re-rete ulturl dierene through the onsolidtion
f bunie between te Wet n te nn-Wet. e le f te n-
sumption of Western pornogrphy in redrwing South Asin prmeters
f ntive ex, uente by Hete Dell (2005) n Mk iety
(2001), i ptiully pt e in pint.
Wen peple ve, te enibilitie y e int ply. Eti y
be njue nt nly by te buny- king kete bve, but l by
te ing f bunie. One exple i ei-tute ntlgi tu-
ing ng ebe f ipi unitie, inpie by iginie f
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
15/41
6 mankekar anD ein
homelnds generted out of the interply of medi nd memory (Mrks
2000; Ny 1993; Sein 2002). In te e f te Hng ip, wee
eln ple-king i entngle wit te putin f eite exu-
lities, trnsntionl erotis remix sex nd spe, refshioning the most
intite f inteiitie. yil itne n pxiity e t be -plexly tiulte in te ntu f eln eie (Sein, ti vlue).
e eti i pue t te feun ite f be ingtee bee
pe f bt initeent n ubjetitin.
Wile ttening t u ptil piuitie, te tuy f tnntinl
ei likewie tiulte wit e tutue el f glbl pe n
ei pwe. nk tuie ve uente u tutue, inlu-
ing Rymond Willimss (1974, 2936) lssi study of television, whih
detiled the penetrtion of U.S. brodsting interest into non-Westernuntie n it funtinl le in te ptin f ket pitli;
Hebet Sille (1989) n Ben Bgikin (2004) tennt itiue f
te npliztin f ei wneip; n Tby Mille (1998) nept
f te new intentinl iviin f ultul lb in wi U.S. ei -
ptin utue putin t e inexpenive ite. ee e yi
instnes in whih the powered struture of trnsntionl medi hs re-
ulte in te ipt nt jut f text n itie but f ptent n
egemonic repreenttion of moernity, progre, te mrket, pleure, teelf, n intiy.
Tnntinl ei, weve, nt t ve egin f te wl t
ln like lien peip in ultue. ey nfun el f ultul
or medi imperilism (see Boyd-Brrett 1977; Mttelrt 1979; Tomlinson
1991) tt epue uptin f te ptil n tepl itintne,
even puity, f ll ultueeen tti n teplveu ei,
wi e een bile n lnizing. A evel l ve e,
te expnin f tnntinl ei nnt be neptulize in te ftelelgil unilineity (Ang 1996; Appui 1996; Mnkek 1999; Mley
1992; Mley n Rbin 1995). Tke, f intne, te euning ue f
sar in teing t eginl ket Sut Ai n Et Ai;
te ineing ppel f Bllyw ine ng uiene in ite i-
pte Nigei, Iel, Get Bitin, te fe Sviet Unin, n Cin;
te eegene f eginl ei tt iulte bt tneginlly n
tnntinlly; n te eve-gwing ignine n inuene f ei
forms suh s zines nd video, whih rissross geogrphilly dispersed
ommunities insted of being produed nd irulted on mss sle.
ee nge ve been f f unif Ai ( te et f te
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
16/41
inTrDUTin 7
wl), ing Inepl Gewl, Akil Gupt, n Aiw Ong guent
tht wht ounts s trnsntionl ppers very dierent in distint geo-
gpil n ptil etting (1999, 653).
e drmti expnsion in the reh nd sle of trnsntionl medi
over the pst severl dedes hs been enbled by spei developmentsin tenlgy, u te pe f tellite tenlgie n te Intenet;
eni ift in te gniztin f glbl pitl tt in tun ve le t
te egniztin f ei inutie tugut te wl; plitil n
legl nge eulting in te egultin n eegultin f ei inu-
tie; n tenin between te epetive gen f ultintinl pitl
n pei ntin-tte. Attept t teize tee ift un int p-
prent contriction. Witout oubt, te neoliberl er een rmtic
nlitin n pivtiztin f ei wneip. A Rbet MCeneyrgue, wt i mot pronounce i te inteniction of corporte inuence
in ei pliyking, peilly te eing f te egultin f ei t
te ket (2004, 4856). Eully iptnt, n pep e funen-
tl t u neptin f eite eti, ei inutie eve te -
ket by pting te ielgil ntut f fee (Hvey 2005) n
f te iniviutelt ilnue, intxite by ie n
ene f eve-newe itie. An Sein (2008) gue f
Hng Aein, f intne, te puuit f ei entepeneuip ientiely nnnt wit te etenent f il welfe inexil f ne-
libel ift in bt te U.S. n Cinee enie.
Te moel of conolitionin term of mei ownerip, inuence, n
ielgil ntenti untee, t etin extent, by te pee.
Witness, for instne, thikening of medi tr between sites of pro-
utin witin Ai, exeplie by te ppulity f Ken p pe
in Cin n pn. Meve, Annbelle Sebeny (2006) pint ut,
nn-Euein ntinl ei inutie ve gine tengt in eentee, wit Bllyw te t tiking exple. Any nlyi f tee
evelopment mut lo tke ccount of te rie in ivere new mei tec-
nlgie, e f wi igt be e eible l n ptil
ivie, n wi nnt but filitte plifetin f f f pu-
tin n nuptin. ye Ginbug, il Abu-ug, n Bin kin
ve gue tt eentlize ll ei ugget te eegene f
new ei e tt i e fgente n ivee in it eni n
il gniztin . . . , e teiti f te expnin f infl
mrket uner neoliberlim n te uiity of lte cpitlim tn te oler
f f ei (2002, 3).
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
17/41
8 mankekar anD ein
One f te nly ttibute fetue f new ei i tei ptentil
to crete or enble new form of ubjectiction well linkge n com-
unitie get itne. intne, in tei lletin n uee
ei in Ai, Ci Bey, n Mtin, n Auey ue eg intetive
ei u Intenet bulletin b, litev, n t vingpke Revlutin, tnfing live n lifetyle, n te n-
itin f te eegene f new kin f nnetivity n unitie
(2003, 12). A we gue lte in ti intutin, we buil n n ept
f ti pp by fuing n newe well le f f ei
(inluing pint, televiin, l, n vie) tt intenify f f nne-
tivity tt ve lng been bugening witin n beyn Ai. We teeby
eit te iplitin tt eent unitive f epeent n bupt
wtee f exul expein.We i, ten, t pu beyn te bini uintly uize by
n Sinli n Stut Cunning fllw: Wee w f peple
often hve tended to be from wht the world-systems theorists ll the
peipey, evelping wl, n tw te ente, etplitn
ntin (e.g. Wlletein, 1991) ei w itilly ve tvele in te
te ietin (2000, 2). Tw f f eue e ike in ti type f f-
ultin. it, epi n te tnntinl bility f pen n b-
ue te ptie f nuptin n igining unetken by te wneve ve. A Wnning Sun put it, Tnntinl igintin evelp
nt nly witin te w e bile, exible n eteitilize but, pe-
p e pignntly, witin te w nnt, will nt, n ve nt tv-
eled (2006, 20). Seond, nd relted, n emphsis on hegemoni medi
w ipute ultul ti t eeiving ei ppultin ptye
witing impotently to be culturlly colonize. Even in intnce wen mei
text e pue in te Wet tey e pte, pppite, engue,
n inee ejete tey iulte t te pt f te wl.Wt we unee, weve, i te itil ignine f Ai t tn-
ntionl trc in mei by poitioning it not merely ite of te reception
of Wetern mei but noter et of noe for prouction n circultion.
Mnkek w, f intne, tt televiin pg pue in Ini,
tenibly ie t Inin uiene, tvel vi tellite t ieent pt
f te wl. Dell exple n intne in wi n Aein-e u-
enty bee te veile by wi Inin-e ptgp iulte
in u lle New k City. Anlyzing te gene f uenty n
te plypny f epne (inluing e wn), e inet te eeptin
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
18/41
inTrDUTin 9
f te l wit ntext nging f te itil (f intne, lnil
n neipeil ntive f eue) t te iuive (u l pn-
i bt witin n utie Ini).
inlly, t eply te lnguge f le, it i iptnt t igligt tt
ny f te ei exine in ti vlue e ite t both te tnn-tinl n te ubntinl le, wit te ntin etie being
eltively weke fe f putin n eeptin (ee l Appui
1996 n Appui n Bekenige 1988). e tniive piuity
f ei llwe u le juping (Sit 1992) t bee -
nple, u tt ubgup, initize gup, n ipi gup
witin ntin-pe igt byp te ntinl le t ptiipte in tn-
ntinl ei iuit, n etie, Sein uggete, eplying
ei text t igine plitni gint te gin f ntinl exlu-in (Sein 1999; ee l Sun 2006 n M. M. ng 1997).
e question of irumventing the ntion provokes relted debtes
un te -lle publi pee (Hbe 1979). e vent f tn-
ntionl medi in postsoilist sttes, for instne, is often luded s
bencmrk of freeom from tte control. Ti rie quetion of weter
it is pproprite to oneptulize medi s vehile for ommunitions
utnu f te tte, wete ineing ei ngletin
eely ete new f f ntl ve te unfettee pee f te pub-li. Witut ttepting t juite enitively between tee tw pi-
tin, we nte ultipliity f ebte, teing tt te biniti ntin
f n ppitinl publi lwy ley ipt ntlwete tte
pte n inexble ntext f eite pee. We wnt t bing
int gete viibility pny f pee f nt neeily euible
t te uetin f eltive utny (ee Gitlin 1998).
si ei, ei siiy
Our theoriztion of erotis ritilly engges soil onstrutionist nd
pttutulit teie f ubjetivity, exulity, n eie. Eti e
tugly n ietievbly entngle wit te socius, t tug wit
te peti n pliti f ieene, pe by te igintin, n fuele
by fntie (Btille 1986; Vne 1991; Wetn 1998). Extening beyn ex
t eie f ex t, tey e ften pint f ultiplex il
tenin (Rubin 1984). Eti ut e int fu tug, nt epite,
tei linkge t te il, te eni, te geplitil, n n. Situ-
te t te inteetin f te pyi n te tutul (Mnkek, ti
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
19/41
10 mankekar anD ein
volume), the eroti is frequently enmeshed in, for instne, yernings for
upw bility, lnging f te eln, fultin f ntin
n itizenip, n uptue f etni n il ientity.
Tking the eroti s n objet of nlysis neessittes being reexively
vigilnt bout the reltionship between epistemology, methodology, ndeti. Dwing n i genelgy f feinit n uee lip, we
rejet notions of the eroti s onstnt biologil substrte tht is sub-
euently pe by ei , f tt tte, by ultue (ee, f intne,
Vne 1991 nd Weston 1998, 9). Coneptulizing the eroti in biologil
terms hs hd implitions for how some sholrs hve theorized sexu-
lity nd rnked soieties nd ultures. It hs enbled the evolutionry
litin f ietie u tt te wy tt gup nle etii
beomes mrker of soil (dis)orgniztion nd evolutionry dvne(Weston 1998, 17, 18). e politil onsequenes of suh prdigm re
fr rehing, prtiulrly when they onverge with rist representtions
f il n ultul Ote. i n be lely een in te iue u-
uning te Httentt Venu, wi ibe evlutiny ieene t
pupte iepnie in nty tt, in tun, wee tnlte int ep-
eenttin f ypeexulity (Giln 1985).
eoretil frmeworks tht explore sexulity nd erotis in terms of
ene ieene ve tene t eite pe exulity ntu-l univel veepize lteity n extii (Mnen n lly
1997, 1). ee ppe e etnenti in tt tey ie te uetin
f we vntge pint ul be ue t juge ene n ieene.
eizing eti entil knwleging te etegeneity f eti vlu-
tin witin n ptiul ultul n itil ntext. i i
exeplie by Zng tuy (ti vlue), wi w w te eeking
ut f linil e f exul elt n yfuntin i etiize tug
i vie pg, e ppul by te ee ft tt te expliit i-uin f exul funtining ie pleuble tngeive vlue be-
ue it ge gint te gin f elie ee f Mit ilene. Mtin
Mnlnn (ti vlue) likewie exple n intne f itutene in
whih wywrd erotis emerges in the t of return of Filipino queers
t te ilippine: wyw eti invlve inubinte elitnt
f f ptie . . . f f eti tt efue eet being ne
t line, nti ietinlity n ipliti lil link t eln.
Dell pte engge tpi tt ntinue t be tb even in libel i-
uin f exulity n exul ntivity: te eti f il n
ilen in n Ote ple, nely, Sngi, e ligt itit in Klkt
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
20/41
inTrDUTin 11
(fely Clutt). A Dell gue,Born into Brothels illutte te -
plex n ntity iue uuning ilen f ex wke:
it itute te ilen in lnpe f eti exe, te l i l ple
f etun t ntive innene, even wile it elive eti e
(ti vlue).We buil n itiue witin uee tey f uniline tjety f te
globliztion of queer exulitie from te Wet to te ret of te worl (ee
l Cen 1995; kn 1997; Mtin et l. 2008; Mi 1994; Rfel 2007;
n Tn 1995). In i gunbeking nlyi f glblizing iue f
gy libertion, Mnlnn ecribe ow, in te ow of Stonewll,
enipty ntive f gy libetin tene t pivilege Weten e-
nitin f e-ex ptie n ginlize t peen un-
libete nn-Weten litie f e-ex eie (1997, 486). Siilly,Gyti Gpint itiue uptin witin e tin f uee
tey tt peent lnil ntutin f Ain exulitie ntei,
peen, n in nee f Weten plitil evelpentntutin
tt e eiulte by ntepy gy n lebin tnntinl pli-
ti (1997, 47374). Wit ieent pp, but nt unlike S ie-
mns srupulous ethnogrphy of disprte lm udienes (this volume),
Gopint project cler pce for embrcing exulitie n erotic eire
t wit nventinl Euein ntive: e nlyi f DeepMet lFire n Sy Selvui nvelFunny Boy fegun w
tee text efue t ubibe t te ntin tt te ppe nifettin
f e-ex etii i witin pliti f viibility in te publi pee
(1997, 482). Se gue tt, in Sut Ain ntext, wt ntitute le-
bin eie y bt lk n funtin ieently tn it e witin Eu-
ein il n itil ftin, n w f ltentive e
f ulinity n feininity (Gpint 1997, 482).
ei c: aii f r, ni, g, sx
One tee tt eu ee i tt f ntettin un ntinl, il,
nd ethni lition, nd round normtivities nd trnsgressions tht
ite pei exulitie wit etin etni, il, ntinl f-
tin n exlue te f ubi f belnging. Se f tee ptie
resonte with older legies of representing Asi s the site of the sexul
exoti. Erly explorer, missionry, olonil, nd nthropologil desrip-
tin kete Ain ite buning in ultue f exul exe, i-
lity, pevein, n epein (Bley 1995; lly 1997; Ree 1997). en,
Ann Stle iniively eunte, pt- Oientlit itiue gene-
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
21/41
12 mankekar anD ein
te euin el f Eupe eltin t te Oient: A pfuin f
litey n itil tuie ve tlgue te wie nge f exul n
gendered metphors in whih the feminized olonies, nd the women in
te, wee t be penette, pe, ilene, n (i)pee (1997, 32).
te ige, peuing int te peent, fu n te Ain ex te, efu tug te Vietn W n U.S. ility be in Ke, pn,
n te ilippine (Mnen 1997; ee l Dell, ti vlue), n n
Ai ening ite f tke wen in lb, ex wk, n ige
(Tlentin 1996), unting t tping f Ai wt ynn ieeye
lle te Wet ft wen (1999). ee il egie f ep-
eenttin ve pille ve t ipi Weten n gy Ain ntext,
ling ntnt te ige f te Ain ypefeinine (wete le
fele) n viuly ypeexul ypexul (D. Eng 1996; ung 1991;Siizu 2007). eguning te etegeneu pitinlitie f Ain
ultul pue, iti, n eiing ubjet evie te igey f
the olonies s site for the revenge of the repressed, n open terrin
f Eupen le ejultin utile in te Wet (Stle 1997, 33), n
of Asins s ompulsorily heterosexul or erotilly restrined, or both.
i pepetive vetil wit te exulity tuie lip nw being
produed in Asi, s found in the groundbreking work of Tiwn-bsed
Joepine Ho on trnexul, pornogrpy, ex worker, n oter exulityrigt iue; publie in journl uc Inter-Asia Cultural Studies n
Intersections: Gender and Sexuality in Asia and the Pacic; n in te p-
eeing f te it Intentinl Cnfeene f Ain Quee Stuie el
in Bngkk in uly 2005.
Minful f te nge f puing gene-blin nlye f te exul,
our ey tke up te frugt reltionip between icoure of gener n
of erotic. On te one n, te erotic i centrlly implicte in te contruc-
tin f egeni ntin f ulinity n feininity. Ou ntibutnlyze w, f intne, Wetene iginie but Eten feinini-
tie nge f te tngeively eti (Dell) t te titillting (Allin) t
te ubege even ivwe ininutin f eti (Cntble). Men-
wile, ultul ntinli n be iplite wit iue f pp-
pitely genee exulity. In Ini, tnntinl televiin entlly p-
tiipte in te engutin f ntin f Inin wn inexe
in pt by exul ppiety (Mnkek). Cnveely, ilen in Klkt w
e, llegely, bn int btel pte vyeuiti eti teing f
tei te exe (Dell).
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
22/41
inTrDUTin 13
At te me time tt linkge between te politic of eire n te poli-
ti f gene nee t be fegune, exulity tuggle nnt be ub-
ue entiely une gene pliti (ee we fllw Rubin 1993; Segwik
1993; Vne 1984; n te). Reltely, pivileging eti ve te pliti
f exulity ik uneetiting te vey eiu nen ite witexul nge (Vne 1984). Ai, tee l lge, if we tink but
te ptie f ee ility ptitutin ft wen iti-
lly, well te extent f ntepy exul explittin bt witin
Ai n tnntinlly, if we tink f te epiei pptin f h n
ads in e Ain ite n it teible ilening in te, if we tink f e-
triction on reprouctive control for women, weter in prontlit or nti-
ntlit ietie, if we tink f te ie in plygynu n nubinge-
type prtnerip ocite wit te trnntionliztion of Ain cpitl.An certin Ain men re not immune from relte nger uc eriou
te f sd in e ex-wk ltin n ee epil f e-ex
eie.
et we wi t ein let t te ik f lluing wit lngtning
trope of feminize Ai ever exul qurry n victim (ee Hrrion 2001).
We uee ti pitue by expling inte e f te e uiky n in-
eteinte ntu f Ain eti, knwleging tt tey e fe
in te uible f ll f te bve. T epize u itute eti, fue, i nt t epint Ain iniiinte pleue-eeke. Inee,
ny f te nlye inlue in ti vlue, epeilly te by Cntble
n Sein, epit wen ege un wit exul ege tt ll
ut eie tt tey, in tun, efue.
rii ai
Our insistene on the ulturl nd historil speiity of eroti desire
unegi u nen wit w Ai i puebt in ppul ul-tul epeenttin f tnntinl ei n in u lly nlye.
Onging iuin witin n utie te U.S. ey but te ng-
ing ntitutin f e tuie n, in ptiul, Ain tuie f te
intelletul ntext f u inteventin. Sevel l ve te te
intitutinliztin f e tuie in te Unite Stte t lge Cl W
liberl project for te conceptuliztion of globl well locl ierence
(Rfel 1997, 92). e intitutinliztin f e tuie w ebee in
te new ipeil viin te Unite Stte f itelf peekeepe n
rbiter of interntionl conict: re knowlege were to equip Americ for
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
23/41
14 mankekar anD ein
ti tk. Ae tuie in te Unite Stte ve l been linke wit et
t fulte libel, plulit neptin f itizenip in te ptSen
Wl W e, in epne t te uetin f w (elite) U.S. itizen ul
pepe teelve f tei ennt leeip le in te wl.
Certinly, neither Asi nor Asin studies hve been singulr or stti.Extening n iptnt ebte n te putin f Ai egin n
n epitelgil tegy ve te lt tw entuie, enjit Du
exine Ai egin f u tie by wing n pepetive in i-
til ilgy n te wk f Heni efebve (1991). He pint ut tt
Ai, egin n put f eginliztin, fllwe egeni
e f ptil putin, in ptiul, te f ipeil eginli,
nti-imperilist projets of regionliztion, postSeond World Wr on-
juntures (inluding the Cold Wr), nd the irultion of popultions(2010, 963). e form nd ontent of Asin studies hve vried in dier-
ent pt f te wl. Nte, f intne, te etegeneity f genelgie,
plitil nn, intelletul gen, n peuptin f Ain tuie
in te Unite Stte, Eupe, Autli, n ei ite Ai. In-
ee, evel Ai- be l gue, nlye f te iuive p-
dution nd deonstrution of Asi hve rih genelogy within spei
n ivee intelletul titin witin Ai, n ve plye fun-
tinl le in te ftin f te vibnt el f itil Ain tuie. intne, Sun Ge itute te iuive unpking f Ai witin lnge
genelgy f pnee intelletul ity n elte it t ifting tjet-
ie f pnee ntinli t ieent itil ent (2000). Wng
Hui pint t biguity n ntitin in te ie f Ai, eting:
e ie [f Ai] i t te e tie lnilit n nti-lnilit, n-
evtive n evlutiny, ntinlit n intentinlit, iginting in
Europe nd shping Europes imge of itself, losely relted to visions of
bt ntin-tte n epie, ntin f nn-Eupen iviliztin, n gegpi tegy etblie tug geplitil eltin (2007, 27).
More reently, Wng Hui hs insisted tht we bring omprtivist per-
petive t te pjet f itiizing Ai. Hui init tt pbletizing
uptin but Ai ut eexine te ntin f Eupe (2010, 986).
We procee, ten, from te premie tt Ai i n untble ignier tt,
in te w f n Hing n Dniel Vukvi, i bilize by ul-
tiple il iginie n enlite in te ipeilit pjet f te Unite
Stte n pn, well by viu ntilnil veent, lline,
n evlutin (2007, 211). Ai ee ntiiztin eitnt t pi-
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
24/41
inTrDUTin 15
tl epie: te evivl f te Bnung piit n te eiliene f pge-
ive ei n tivit netwk be n Sut-Sut llbtin
exit alongside te eeene f Ain ntin-tte tt e j ub
for the movement of globl pitl. As Yn nd Vukovih rgue, While
we nnt epe etinking te uetin f Ai, we l n neite e-due Asi to ertin Western historil imginries nor invoke n essen-
til, ntlgilly pue Ai elf-evient, elf-uient, n elf-e
(2007, 212). A neptuliztin f Ai bile, nging lletin
f pe tt neve ettle blutely inie ny xe bunie (uen
2003, 1069; ee l Sun Ge 2000, 5) ente wit u wn inteet in te
(e)putin f Ai tug te tnntinl eitin f eti.
ene Mnen n Mget lly init tt, te tn lk f
exti eti ptie uniue t Ai n te i, we ul inte-gte eti in te f -ultul exnge in exulitieexnge
f ening well te eti liin f bie (1997, 1). Dwing n te
pineeing wk f Ew Si (1979), Rni Kbbni (1986), Mlek Allul
(1986), nd others, on the ple of the eroti in representtions of ril
n ultul Ote, we k w u e f knwlege putin but
erotic, te epitemologicl n teoreticl frmework we eploy, converge
wit, reinforce, or contet te wy Ai i icurively contitute. A Roger
nster nd Miel di eonrdo hve utioned, we need to void nientity plitil fing, nt iply beue it et te tniti-
l n -ultul exitene f nlycertain glbl ientitie but, e
iptntly, beue ti enie te ity n itiity . . . f te wiely
vying wy exulitie ve been unet n ptie (1997, 5). Ou
inteet ee lie in expling w tnntinl ei le in ntituting
eti iplite te putin f Ai el f ppul epeent-
tin, ee, n knwlege putin.
Hene we invke n Ai in ei e, lwy in putin. We n-eive f Ai n eblge f ie, itie, n ige, te vey n-
tutin f wi i unte by etegeneu legie n eie f
empire, nd vstly dierent histories of riliztion (ompre Sid 1979;
Lowe 1991; n Morley n Robin 1995 for imilr unpcking of Europe).
How o tee vrie, icrepnt entnglement wit te pt pe trnn-
tinl ultul putin in te uent itil ent? Hw tee
intinuu itie inet ultul putin by Ain teelve?
A we ve uggete, epite te enuing pwe f lnil, ptlnil,
n nelnil iue f iliztin, ultul ieene, n e-
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
25/41
16 mankekar anD ein
nity tt iulte but n witin Ai, neite Ai n Ain n be
eue t bjet f innt Weten gze. u, f intne, in e
bk e Hypersexuality of Race, Celine e Siizu nlyze te l
101 Asian Debutantes n Good Woman of Bangkokt exple w Sut-
et Ain ptitute ue tei bie t pek bk in ene f epe-enttin. By pliting te geny f tee wen, Siizu peent
te nt iply veeteine by e n eni, but [] ub-
jet w engge tenlgie f te viul n te exul in e t wite
teelve int te itil e (2007, 225).
Meve, even wen te Wet ue petl peene in ebte
urrouning trnntionl mei (n, more broly, globliztion), we cn-
not ssume the totlizing power or the singulrity of the so-lled West-
en gze. In ti vlue, we juxtpe ei text but Ai ntutein te Wet wit te ntute witin Ai n it ip in e
t w ut te iuive ntinuitie n intinuitie tt ut
te. In evel intnef exple, in te e f Hng pue f
vie, Innein publie fgay n lesbi zine, n ilen in Klkt
wieling lne eAin en n wen eize te en f ep-
eenttin. Wile ti e nt uttilly iel te f eplying
ilize Oientlizing f f epeenttin, it plite ny e-
uctive unertning of Ain lwy-lrey victim of n objectifyingWeten gze. An, in te e eibe by Cntble, ilipin n Cinee
wen invlve in epnene utip eit wt A Wiln (1988,
119) clle te retoricl vulnerbility of ctlogue brie, countering teir
objetifying representtions s eroti objets by presenting themselves s
plex pen, n in tun ejeting teile ket nlgie n view
f teelve itie (Cntble, ti vlue).
n Mi
e rise of new medi tehnologies pushes us further in rethinking the
dynmis by whih Asins re onstruted nd negotited. Asins hve
oupied highly spetulrized positions in reltion to the tehnologies
of new medi. ree key gures of representtion hve been slientthe
ile nible-ngee lbe in pute-ebly wetp, te gen-
ee bjet f ientlit eie ee eite tug vitul ut-
ip tug pngpi epeenttin in ybepe, n te be-
croing cyborgin geek, wit cce to pecil, h-1 vi ttu in te Unite
Stte tnk to i extrorinry ig-tec prociencie.7 A telling contr-
itin, ublene t Ai, peit in tee egie f epeenttin: n
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
26/41
inTrDUTin 17
te ne n, Ai ppe ie in te pvety tt pue ufeit f
lbe, bie, n ex wke, wile n te te n, Ainwete
tnntinl teie Ai-be ptine een gne-
ing ipptinte pt f putin f ei eletni.
A ebte ge in enty n te ptentilitie f igitl ige-king (Gnzlez 2003) n te Intenet (Dniel 2009b; Gnzlez 2009;
Tukle 1995). I it vitul pe wee bie ientitie u e n
gene e entute n eve, ui t be inignint? O i
it ite wee, tug intene viul n textul putivity, u ienti-
tie e e ypeviible n, inee, bee uil eiu f il
proess in suh rens s gming nd vtrs, dvertising, musi videos,
n Intenet ting (Nku 2002, 2007)? Wt ke viul ientitie
en? Inee, w viuliztin f un e t ignify ientitie(Hnen 2004)?
eiztin ve nt tken up gegpi ientitie t nely te e-
gee tt tey ve entetine e n gene, but te uetin lely
tnfe. e gepe f Ai e ineingly unbee by te izi
veent f igitl unitin, but t te e tie we ee n l-
t vil intenitin f te iging f Ain ple tt tn t fu-
te tbilize te egin te lngtning Ote it teitilly
been. Ryn Bip n illin S. Rbinn (2002) nlyze w ti peply ut tug te pting f Intenet enty but Weten ex
tourit erotic exploit overe. Li Nkmur (2003) ow ow ielize
ientlit ige e el ntnt in m , in e t epize te
wy univerl computer lnguge penetrte tee oterwie oie pce.
But new ei unitin ve nt nly exebte tee ige
tug ultiplying te in ybepe. ey ve l plifete venue
f llenging peviling tpe. intne, te tivit l Kitin
Wng ete k il-e bie webite eigne t ubvet teexpettin f nty guy in e f petite nke Ain bie (Hu-
n 2007, 45) by nfnting te wit gteue ige n tetening
untentive ee by Ain wen. uy in Nguyen Tu eibe
severl digitl porn produtions by Asins tht brek open the semless
w f inftin tt peent wen itil nitin iti-
l neeitie (2003, 277). On te te ie, Weten en eeking e-
pnene ige, uente by Cntble (ti vlue), tively
eek t efy tei wn iging etilly explittive tug tei wn
nline textul putine piily wit e te. All tee ex-
ple ugget le tt new ei ve plye in ntuting n -
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
27/41
18 mankekar anD ein
pliting Ai, uneing tt l f Ain tuie nee t gue
ei pinently in itil ee eign.
gii di
Even ei ve wugt pfun tnftin in n beyn Ai,it would be foolhrdy to overprivilege medi s the exlusive engines of
eti enunte n nge. Sexul intetin, Stle (1991) t
peuively gue, w tnfing Ai f te eliet ent f
lnili, n etinly n be gue t ve been ignintly peent
in even elie e f expltin n te (Bley 1995). T be nvine
f w eep n wie exul enggeent ve been bt itilly n
ptilly, ne nee nly ell te uing f wen f igln New
Guine but gl ppet tey lept wit in te li uentyFirst Contact(Cnnlly n Anen 1982) te unt f Tbin-
e n te uneibility f te iiny pitin, eibe in Bnilw
Mlinwki Sexual Life of Savages (1929). But el f ntt, f eti
billird blls knoking up ginst one nother, misses the point. Ehoing
Vinnne A n Stey igg, we init n ving beyn ti ten-
eny t let ultul ieene fulte tey; te, we fu n w
exulitie e ntitute in n tug pjet tt blu te bunie
between ultue, n n litie (2005, 7).Beyn te u-tute Eupen lnil pjet, te int-Ain
enggeent, u pnee ipeili n te intitutin f ft
women (Tnk 2002), hve likewise shifted sex from being bounded by
lolity to being onstituted out of ross- ntionl interhnges. Trnsn-
tinl ei n be een in e wy extening tee intenge,
produing n intensition of mobile messges, imges, notions round
ex, rter tn boie in contct per e. Mei fcilitte te pce of mobility
f eti un te glbe. An ei e etie gent f bingingboie into contct. Te Internet ting or mrrige veicle i, of coure,
te bet exple f ti, but tee e te exple, u Sein tuy
of Hmong medi prodution prties tht preipitte sexul enounters
(ti vlue). Dwing n n extening gwing litetue n te glb-
liztin n iliztin f exulity, evelpe tly in uee tuie
(Altn 2001; Cuz- Mlve n Mnlnn 2002; D. . Eng 2001; Hpe
et l. 1997; Mnlnn 2003; Ngel 2003; ttn n Snez-Epple 2000;
vinelli n Cuney 1999), we ytetilly entte te etege-
neu wy tt tnntinl ei enble n, t tie, elete tee
pee.
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
28/41
inTrDUTin 19
Bi f li
FaasY
Ting te wk f ei in te putin n egultin f eti e-
uie tt we l tke eiuly te el f fnty: Slvj iek pintut, ug fnty, we len w t eie. ntie pvie te -
inte f u eie, n l ntitutete tn fulll tify
eie (1989, 118). At te e tie, it i iptnt t tt fntie,
inluding eroti fntsies, re hrdly unmoored from soil nd histori
ntext. eguning te il n plitil neuentility f fnty,
Allin ein u tt fnty i nt ee n epit fnty,
te term i often ue colloquilly, but rter i contitute in reltionip to
te pei ilieu in wi peple live n t wi tey efe even wenonstruting imginry worlds (1996, 12425). Indeed, beyond existing
ilieu, e ve gue tt eite eti fnty even tn t be
etbilizing il fe (Hunt 1993; Avin 2007).
But wht re the kinds of fntsies generted by trnsntionl medi?
en plne n en- Betn ntli et tt fnty . . . i nt te
bjet f eie, but it etting (1986, 26). i pplie u t ei
produed on smller sle, suh s videos nd zines, s it does to ele-
tni ei like te Intenet n Weten-pue ei, u Hllyw ine. Hw e tee ptentilitie f fnty fine n
refione tey trvel cro ivere meicpe n geogrpie of te
igintin? An w n we tee pt te intentinlitie f ei p-
ue, w y be peting wit intuentl tive f te putin
f fnty (keting, lity, plitil-ielgil iipline, elt eu-
tin, et.), f te unuly n piiu penen f eeptin wee
ll nne f untx n unipte epne y genete fnty
teil? nty, ten, igt be t ne infe by but l ijuntivewit tp-wn ei ege. It i pe wee innt e y be
eignie, eite plyfully ppitinlly.
e extent t wi u fntie e bt uue wit n genete
by ei pbletize u unetning f te puttive bunie be-
tween self nd soiety, inside nd outside. Boellstor wrns ginst im-
pliit teie f geny tt unelie ny eiptin f -eite
eti, eie, n pleue in Ai (n elewee). Agin n gin, pe-
il eti, eiing, pleuing elf i gnte n ue ntlgil pi-
ity: ipping pen te newppe, ung te Web, n ten enily
entering into trnsformtive reltionship with the mss medi in ques-
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
29/41
20 mankekar anD ein
tin (2003b, 23). In ntt, u neptuliztin f ei, eti, n
ubjetivity e utully iplite. intne, we e inteete in w
erotis spwn ulturllynd historillyspei modlities of person-
n ubjet n teeby pbletize uptin f n ini-
viute ubjet f exulity (Mnen n lly 1997, 24). At te etie, ttening t ieent litie f ubjetivity inf w we n-
eive f eite eti.
If, s noted erlier, our fntsies re spei to the milieus in whih
we imgine our worlds, so too re the forms tken by eroti desire. e
ei we invetigte in ti vlue enjin u t upen ny bune
eteinte ntin f wt pie eti text. De eti invlveent
in ei egnize be between exul n nnexul epeenttin?
Etngpi enggeent tell u gin n gin tt nly by ppeen-ing epii n ineteinte ening t iete ent f eeptin
n we even begin t egnize ptten, weve ntingent, in te p-
utin f eti. S ien pte in ti vlue eftly ugget
il well lebin fntie f il eltin itibute
Twin Bracelets lm viewerip. Contble exmine ow te Americn men
n ilipin n Cinee wen w ente int eltinip tug tei
ebeip in nline netwk efue t ubue te plite eie
uuning epnene ige witin eti n fegun in-sted the relm of heterosexul domestiity through mrrige, s well s
other longings, for delity, upwrd mobility, nd nnil nd emotionl
euity, ping te pitin n ptie f e infnt.
aFFc, odY, dsr
e dynmis of the interply between medi nd erotis ompels re-
tinking f nept u tutue f feeling (R. Willi 1974) n
emotion tlk (Abu-Lugo n Lutz 1990) tt imply ominnt icoure
tiggeing ubjetive tte tug tutue ening. Mei nup-
tin, in it le lgenti teiti, it eny ultiieninlity,
whih often privileges the visul, the url, nd even the hpti (Deleuze
1989; Mrks 2000), nnot be redued to proess of the struturing of
etin. A Bin Mui ugget, ti ltte pe betw piity
nt te ley ene ielgil te tutue tt inibe, in-
deed odes, the body in preditble, nd legible, fshion. In muh medi
nuptin, weve, nt nly e te by bee invlve, but tee
ent f wt we igt ll et ee itintin between te py-
i, te gnitive, n te pel. ngpy i, f ue, te t
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
30/41
inTrDUTin 21
pprent exmple of this, but, s ind Willims (1991) hs pointed out,
te gene, u te tejeke n te ty, likewie neeily
iplite te viel in plex entngleent wit ening n ielgy.
At n even more fundmentl level, medited erotis hllenge us to
rethink the bodily in delineting wht is the eroti. Wht would it mento think inorporel erotis? Andy Mih hs suggested this for ybersex
wi peent f f enggeent tt llenge nventinl une-
tning f ex funentlly bily enggeent wit te (2002,
363). ne ex n ybe ex, f ue, peent pble llenge,
e te lity nuptin f pint pngpy. By tining u len
n ei eti, we ben ti inuiy, king wt f f intepe-
sonl reltions, inluding sexul nd orporel or not, might be brought
int being, pep even get pyil itne, tug ptiip-tin in eite wl? iel f pelity n teility e nee-
ily fugt n unlely ete; eie f exul enunte inte-
twine wit te f itie lifetyle (ee Wiggin 2000), likewie
puing te liit f wt i tugt f pel. Deie f eil
normly, or for freedom from pin, intermingle with eroti knowledges
glene, in Zng intne (ti vlue), f Cinee i tlk w
vie. e ulity f ti vie pue it wn eny eet, eet tt
e inete by ey, f te ftne f te vie i pleuble peielybeue f w it ntt wit , bt vie f te Mit e.
llwing Mui epi n veent, n pe befe igni-
tin ing (2003, 7), it bee ugent, ten, t be ttentive t te
il life f bie ei nuptin. It i nt nly but ley ini-
viute ubjet in yi eltin wit ei text, n i it nly but
w enle ubjet e intenlly nge tug elting t ei. If,
S Ae (2004, 120) l, ign ue etive vlue n eet
f tei veent, it bee ineingly iptnt t t te tn-ntinl iultin nt nly f ei f teelve but l f te f-
fective economie in wic tey prticipte. How, ten, oe te intenic-
tin f et tug te iultin, te ubbing up gint e te, f
etin ign iplite il pe? Mei n be i t ve ubjet,
n in turn to pwn movement of peron cro pce n into new ocil
eltin. e uble ening f ve bt etive n ptili
uil ee, Ajun Appui pinte ut ely n in king te n-
netin between te il ptie f igintin n eiin but i-
gtin (1996; ee l Mnkek 2008, 15354). i pe i eftly illu-
tte in Ken Kelky tuy f te wy te ingpy f Weten en
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
31/41
22 mankekar anD ein
tt iulte in pn elpe t inpie pnee wen ultivtin f
wt e ll intentinlit eie (2001, 133).
In te pe f te iultin f ign n te etin f ne f in-
tensied et, other soil eets re inherent. Both reltionlity (Ms-
sumi) nd borders (Ahmed) re produed in these mobilities. By rel-tinlity, Mui nnte kin f il penne, ptentility f
eting new t eege tug intetin: Reltinlity i te pten-
til f ingul eet f ulittive nge t u in exe ve
uppleent t bjetive intetin (2003, 225). Wit te iultin f
ign in ei bilitie, tee peit te pibility f unpeitble in-
tne f ing-tgete: it i nt tt ign ipe tei unif ipt
everywhere they trvel, but rther tht eh moment of reeption, in its
eny n etive enity, ntin te pibility f new ening nveent. One f te ptentil ute, in Ae fultin, i te
lignent f ubjet wit lletivitie n te nitnt putin f
il bunie (2004, 117). Mei n tei nuptin e uil nt
nly in einfing unitie but l in puing unntiipte f
f belnging. Extening tee line f tugt, it bee le w e-
ite eti, ptiully wit it intene invlveent f te by, igt
genete eiing ubjet in eltin t new bjet f eie.
ei k: eimi, M, ei
Ou ntibut pee f ivee epitelgil fewk in tei
theoriztion of medi erotis. Indeed, we posit tht studying erotis nd
trnsntionl medi lls for retive formultion of trnsdisiplinry
frmeworks in synergisti rtiultion with nthropologil ethnogrphy.
ut tee i n univel enitin f eti, tee i n et ingul
et f tuy. Ou etlgil ie e pe by te bjet
n ubjet f u enuiy n nt by iipliny tining litin.Hene, we eexively tet n ben li etngpi et f
prtiipnt observtion nd interviewing in onjuntion with textul nd
iuive eing.
Our ontributors sometimes tlk to informnts bout medi nd sex,
n t te tie viuly wt n liten lngie n ve ule
(Geetz 1973, 452), ptiipte in eite unitin, engge text
teelve tug intepeting te n tug ting tei nve-
tin wit te text, uent te putin pe, fllw text t
ieent ite f nuptin, n fllw ei pue n nue
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
32/41
inTrDUTin 23
in tei wn peegintin. Mny f tee fllwing igt be eibe
wt Sein (2002, 231) lle itinent etngpy, et tt
i in piit itele, fuing n tnient, epii ggegtin f peple
n n ntnt bilitie f pen n ei put.
Ou intentin in ti vlue i bt t invetigte tnntinl ein, we nte elie, t ntut tnntinl nlyti; ene, in-
te f fulting ptive pp be n te piltin f
ivee intntitin f eti, we exple te tnntinl nnetin
unegiing te eitin f eti in Ai n beyn. Wt e e
f te wy ti tnntinl nlyti n be ntute? One ttegy
wul be t bw f Gege Mu (1998) uggetin t nut
ultiite elwk n t fllw te ting, in u e, t fllw
ptiul ei tey ke tei wy te wl. But tee e pit-fll t neiving f ei n ultue ntlgilly epte ultue
yteilly itint f e te. Su uetin f ieene un
e n int nxietie but te llegely genizing eet f glbl-
iztin.
e etlgil n epitelgil pliti ineent in te pu-
tin f eti knwlege but ultul Ote e fugt, i evient
in Dell juxtpitin f te tut li f uenty l pue
by Weten junlit wit te f Dub, n tivit gniztin tt lng tuggle f te igt n epweent f ex wke in Kl-
kt, well e wn vie tivit-l. Hw n e bilize te
lterntive vntge point of lol sex-worker orgniztion to ounter
Wetern emoniztion of Ain protitute witout in turn reifying ctivit
knowledge prodution s the uthenti truth of those still-Other Asins?
Mnlnn nlyi f te intepettin f te lMiguel/Michelle n
te pt f viewe in New k n Mnil ugget ne ltentive t te
reition of ulturl dierene risked in following text ross dier-
ent ultue. Rejeting te ntin tt tee intepetive unitie e
ne t ple, Mnlnn nlyze te ineing intennetin
n t between te tw ite in e t ilge te ie f itint
ommunities by foregrounding how people re inresingly in trnsit
bt in igintin n fnty n tul pyil tvel (ti vlue).
Similrly, Friedmns nlysis of the lm Twin Bracelets nd its reeption
ng intepetive unitie in te Unite Stte, Tiwn, n Cin
tee iuive ijuntue in te intelligibility f e-ex eti tt
ut tee ieent ite. Mei bility eege key t tee n-
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
33/41
24 mankekar anD ein
lytil ttegie n Dell ve f putting Dub knwlege in tn-
ntinl iultin lngie te f te w-winning uenty n
be een ne tti f u tnntinl bility.
qsos oF aLYCulturl studies perspetives developed t the University of Birminghm
ve been ptiully inpiing t te f u nene wit evelping
teetil ppe tt ebe te yi iultul iplitin
f ppul text. Wile we nt by ny en eek t elinete ene
ingle ingul el f ultul tuie, evel f u ntibut
deploy wht we might brodly desribe s ulturl studies pprohes to
the reltionship between textulity nd soility. In this pproh, popu-
l ultue i neptulize te ite n tke f ultul tuggle, te en f nent n eitne. It i ptly wee egeny ie,
nd where it is seured (S. Hll 1981, 239). Texts, brodly onstrued, re
intitely ibite wit ultul tuggle, te pliti f te ppul n
te publi, n te eveyy live f iny en n wen. Wit tee
coniertion in min, we eek to expn te fruitful, lbeit tene, interfce
between ntplgy n ultul tuie.
At the sme time tht we deenter n exlusive fous on medi texts,
we tke eiuly tei teilitytei f, te epeenttinl tte-gies they deploy, their modes of ddress, nd the semioti nd disursive
repertoires tht they drw upon. Allison, for exmple, sensitively tres
te ntive n etil ttegiete itetni f itnt inti-
yeplye inMemoirs of a Geisha tt len it u pweful u
f utentiity. Siilly, Dell integte te eet f viul text, ex-
ining u inetgpi n eiting teniue te ue f kne
n ligt in te f w tey igt ply n uiene iginie.
Attening t te tnntinl eitin f eti l euie tt wetke eriouly quetion of enuncition (Mercer 1991, 181). Our conception of
enuncition, gin, i not circumcribe by utoril intention. For intnce,
Allin lMemoirs of a Geisha in tenin wit tee te text tt l
explore te erotic ttrction of Jpn n te Jpnee for Weterner: Pierre
tiMadame Chrysanthme (1910), Alen Bi nvel Silk(1997),
n n Tet Great Mirrors Shattered(1999). By ting te ntinuitie
n intinuitie tee tee text, Allin itute te epite-
lgil eti fMemoirs in n intetextul el in wi gene n te-
plitie ingle witut eling. In ti nne, even e nlyze te
utoril intention implicit in te text eployment of retoricl trtegie,
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
34/41
inTrDUTin 25
Allin ntextulize te pinte epne f it ee by ituting
te witin lge ntive titin tt ve been pue in te Wet
(n, tenibly, tgete t Weten ee) f eteexul eti liin
between Weten en n pnee wen. N, we nte elie, e te
text n iue pue by Ain iune t elf-Oientlizing t te nge f elf-bjetitin. Exining te pliti f enunitin,
teefe, nit f nlyzing text e f e ibite wit
te ultiple iuive ntext f wi it eege n f wi it
i ntitutive pt. Cntext, in tun, f f being li, unnging
bkdrop to medi texts, re historilly ontingent nd in prt medi-
genete.
Integting te plex n etie unpeitble wy viewe/
nue/ee pp ptiul text i nitent wit wt V. N.Vlinv (1986) eibe te ultientulity f ign. We n-
not redue reeption to empiriist or positivist simplitions of wht
text relly mens to udienes. Our ontributors present rnge of
methodologil strtegies for nlyzing the multiple wys trnsntionl
text uie ening f tei uiene/viewe/nue. Agint n
btte ntin f pettip, Mnlnn exine te ebie
hrter of the reeption ofMiguel/Michelle, while Judith Frquhr nd
Zng init n fling uetin f itil niune n tep-lity int tei expltin f te pleue nue igt eive f
elt iue.
hoaL rad
Se f u etlgil ttegie igt fll une te ubi f wt
Sein lle n etntextul et (ti vlue). An etntextul
pproc emerge from te frugt interection, contentiou tey ve
been prouctive, of ntropology n literry n culturl tuie. Inverting
te originry Geertzin iciplinry poition tt culture oul be tougt
f text tt ul be e n intepete litetue wul be, etn-
textulity et tt textin te e f ti vlue, ei textul
be enuntee ultue t wi pnply f intepetive n nlytil
ppe n be pplie. Su ppe e ley nely ne in te
genelgy f etngpi putin tt nene itelf wit wt
e e nly egnize ultul ptie but, in lge pt be-
ue f te ubility f iipliny tuf nen, ve nt been ut-
ize pplible by ntplgit t textul teil, wete viul
vebl. Dwing n uil inigt f te eexive n ilgi ent
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
35/41
26 mankekar anD ein
in nthropology, ethnotextulity entils deided sense of the ethnogr-
pe invlveent in ening-king n f te neeity f tt invlve-
ent being ne f nging enggeent, intelutin, even tuggle ve
ignitin. E. Vlentine Dniel eibe ti ve te tnltin
f ultul text int ntextue text n te epleent f te uetf epitelgil etintie wit eifying nvetin between elf
n Ote (1996, 11). In te t litel petinliztin f ti, Sein,
ien, n te ette iete ilgue but ptiul lip
e f ei ee.
It i f t pitivit neit t peue tt we n extt ietly
f u infnt ntive ll we nee in e t unetn te ig-
nitin f ei. Deibing e enunte wit tw en ping ve n
illutrte exul iee textbook in booktore, Frqur mue: Antro-plgit e uppe t be ble t k peple wy tey ting. Wen
we , n wen peple will tlk t u, we ten t pivilege te nwe we
get if tey wee te utenti vie f te peple. But in ti itutin,
I ke, even I knwn tee tw en n etblie e f f
(ntplgilly fble) ppt wit te, wt ul tey ve tl e
but tei eing pe? (ti vlue). Regnizing ti uny, we
eek gete nune in unpking te ubtlety by wi ei text nt nly
ke ening, but inite eie, pe ientitie, fin etin, i-plnt fntie, n n. ey ti, f ue, in pt tug tigt-
fw ignitin, n l tug et, te ene, n te unn-
iu.
Just s it is not suient to simply sk udienes wht texts men to
them, neither is it s simple s reding subjetivity o of dominnt dis-
ue, even f u le pwee text, u e f te ei
form we exmine ere. Suc reing repreent excee of textulity. Wt
etngpe n bing t tee ppe, inte, i nely textueeneent tt pef eing nly in te ue f ieive inte-
tion with those other reders bout whom we seek to write. It mens
tking these texts seriously in terms of their multiple nd ontrditory
eets nd ppeling to our own subjetivities for dditionl interpretive
inigt beyn wt infnt n pek. Etntextulity i in pt but
nuing tgete; n it i l but tking eing n eeptin ei-
uly inte ptie tt nnt neeily be nte, tt eew
niu tking, tt invlve intene et, n tt iplite viulity
n te by. Beue tee e f eeptin nnt lwy be eibe
elf-eexively by infnt, it i inubent upn te etngpe t en-
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
36/41
inTrDUTin 27
unte text ietly, t let te text ply upn te ubjetivity f te et-
ngpe well, n t pef itil intepettin n te bi f n
etngpi enibility in wi ne ubjetivity i intitely entngle
wit te f infnt n i inete by tei nen.
h rsarchaL roc
A elte et f etlgil iue ie in fining ee n eti
(n, inee, n unteeti). In e iniive itiue f te uen-
try impertive unergiring te reuctively empiricit focu on exul ct
in nnil etngpie f exulity, Kt Wetn gue tt tee p-
pe e peupie wit gteing t n te exul bevi f ul-
tul n il Ote witut eutely teizing exulity (1998, 67).
Suc n pproc rik repreenting culturl n rcil Oter eviencing ntulize n univel ex ive , ltentively, nifeting exti
exul bevior tt inexe n reinforce teir ricl lterity. Abtrcting
exul ptie f il life (n tu eplying wt Wetn, wing
n te wk f Henik Kuklik [1997], eibe te -n-fun p-
proc) ten to foter mitken impreion of ocil cience reerc on
exulity n vewelingly epiil pjet. Epiil it been n
ut be, but nt witut n ege tt i iultneuly l, teetil,
plitil, n nlytil (1998, 11).Inee, te form of erotic tt we eek to unertn re rrely trigt-
fwly ee tug inteview n e, f te t pt, iniil t
iet bevtin. A etngpe, we neeily py le ttentin
t wt u ee ubjet y n . et we uppleent wit nn-
lgenti pp tt elie n e extenive ptie f intepet-
tin. intne, Mnkek eibe w e etngpi ptie w
inete by e fu n te eltinip between ei, te eti, n
te el f fnty. Stly fte beginning etngpi elwk n titpi e fun tt e t len t liten t e infnt ilene,
eittin, n iuive etu n g beyn te vebl, te iu-
ive, n te viible. Wen e w ble t , e fun ueptitiu
ommentries being mde on issues of sexulity nd morlity in wide
viety f ntext (ti vlue).
Questions bout methods neessrily rise questions bout ethis.
Wetn nen but te ik f te uenty ipetive in e
tuie f exul bevi n bit fegun te nge f vyeu-
i entile nt nly in w we wite but eti, but l in te en
by wi we btin n pue knwlege but eti. Cnventinl
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
37/41
28 mankekar anD ein
soil siene methods of survey reserh, interviewing, nd prtiipnt-
bevtin ee inpppite n intuive, if nt egegiuly enive,
in mny of the ulturl nd soil ontexts in whih we work. Severl of
u ntibut eet n te fugt etil n etlgil pe
tey negtite in tei ee. Cntble nte w e wn pitin observer observed ws brought to risis: worries expressed by some
ebe tt e igt negtively epeent tei -be lline
fe e t witw f ne Intenet unity. Dell ke le te
tke wen tivit wk but pweful ei text, ening tt te
eee ent n inteventin in te f f lying ut te neuene
f epeenttin n iepeenttin. e iue ee i nt te el e-
e teniue we n ul ue t get t u infnt expe-
in f eti eie, fntie, yening. Inte, u nen i witte epitelgil n etil iplitin f w we fulte u b-
jet f inuiy n intepettin.
Ou ntibut eply nge f epitelgil n etlgil
ttegie t elve int te iniet, eluive, n elliptil ntue f eti
(Allison 1989). Allison formultes the notion of epistemologil erotis
in e nlyi f fntie inite by itne n infue wit n intite
filiity. In itin t beving te etin f e intevieweetei
viible exiteent n, in e e, bviu ul tey pek t ebutMemoirs, e e eti tug te len f te llue f fntie
generte by being trnporte to noter plce n time. Oter contribu-
t itute eti in te f it inteetin wit pnply f yening:
Dell, by expling te njuntue f puient fintin n l upei-
ity eging Klkt ex wke; Zng, by elting eti t lnging
f elt n eilly ene nlity; Bellt, by exining w
eroti desire rtiultes with desires for ntionl belonging; nd Mnke-
k, by iting eti in lge web f eie engenee by, ng teting, yening f itie n f l bility.
u ek but te iulty f intepeting te pleue u
informnts derive from populr ulture seem prtiulrly pt for erotis.
Wt e te kin f eeneuti t wk in u et t epeent (
even intuit) te eti feeling, pitin, nxietie, n fntie f u
infnt? e lge uetin we wi t ie ee i w u wn e-
ie e ibite in u will t knwlege. Allin itiue f te -
iplitin f eti eie wit eie f knwlege in Tet Great Mir-
rors Shatteredi ptiully tugt-pvking. Se tee te ebie
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
38/41
inTrDUTin 29
nturethe eroti epistemology nd epistemologil erotisof the ps-
sionte pursuit of knowledge bout (ulturl, ril, nd soil) Others.
Extplting f ti itiue, we eek t eet n w u eie igt
be iplite in te itnt intiy pue by etngpi el-
work n oter form of culturl nlyi, n ow tee eire migt pete entngleent f elve wit n gint n te (Allin, ti vl-
ue). We nnt lwy tiulte te pleue we btin f u wn
intertions with populr texts; even less n we rtiulte the plesures
uuning u eti lnging n fntie. Hene, in itin t ting
te iuive plifetin f eti tug te fntie n yening
inite by tnntinl ei, we tive l t e tee intne f e-
itin gint te gin, t te tei gp n ellipen t tin f,
liten t, n, ultitely, epet te tutteing, eitnie, inietin,n ilene uuning eti.
n
1. a Bnne f Ineent ge, Times of India, nuy 18, 2007, ttp://
rtiles.timesondi.inditimes.om/20070118/indi/27879518_1_xn-tv-hnnels-
tin-nnel.
2. See Ri Gee Kie Silp SettyRit Enue,Jawa Report, Apil 17, 2007,
ttp://ypetjw,u.nu/ive/. e lt tw ee ve witnee evel te
ntveie teing f te eti eging f te Inin publi pee. One
f te t ntiu f tee ntveie w te ptet n vilene uun-
ing te elee f te Deep Met lFire in Ini in 1998. nge f lly
nlye f ti ntvey, ee te wk f Gpint (2006), Kpu (2000), n tel
(2004).
3. See Beijing eut Dp Cge gint Online Nue Ct, Monitor-
ing International Reports, Apil 18, 2007; Cin Cen un W n Cybee,
Agence France-Presse, Apil 13, 2007.
4. See l Bellt nlyi f te ii f ntext in ei tuie (ti vlue).5. See, f intne, kin (2000) n Sein (2002); ee l Ginbug, Abu-ug,
n kin (2002, 3).
6. See, f intne, te wk f Appui (1996), Mnkek (1999), D. Mille (1995),
nd Wilk (2002) for some nlyses of the unforeseen implitions of trnsntionl
ei.
7. Niitu Onii, Cin ut k t Seul f Inpitin, New York Times,
nuy 2, 2006, a1, a7.
8. We i neite t nte il ntutinit n pttutulit ppe
ee, n t te tei iilitie e tn tei ieene. N we inten tuize ynteize wt e vluinu bie f lip. Nevetele, te
l we wk been funtinl t u neptuliztin f ubjetivity,
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
39/41
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
40/41
inTrDUTin 31
muc-reference volume tt emontrte etnogrpic reerc meto for tuy-
ing new ei ptitine.
22.Cpe Hnnez (1996) n Mu (1996).
23. ee exit ultipliity f ultul tuie ppe, n ing jutie t ti
etegeneity i beyn te pe f ti intutin. In pinting t ti ptiul
pp, u bjetive i iply t inite it liene ne f te ny genelgie
f lip tt ve inpie u.
24. Cpe Mee (1991, 171) ey n te itil ntingeny f ntext.
25. See l Sein (1997) nlyi f te plyey f te ige f te wite wn
by it iulte Cin.
26. See te wk f Mleki (1991) f n eluent itiue f te pitivit ipetive
in il iene ppe.
27. See l te wk f Otne (1995), w l fegun te ebie ntue f
te etngpi entepie.
7/30/2019 Media, Erotics, and Transnational Asia edited by Purnima Mankekar and Louisa Schein
41/41
purniMa Mankekar i ocite profeor of gender tudie
nd Ain Americn tudie t the Univerity of Cliforni,Lo Angele. She i the uthor ofScreening Culture, Viewing
Politics: An Ethnography of Television, Womanhood, and Nation
in Postcolonial India (Duke Univerity re, 1999) nd the
coeditor with Gordon H. Chng nd Akhil Gupt ofCaste and
Outcast, by Dhn Gopl Mukerji (2002).
louisa schein i ocite profeor of nthropology nd
women nd gender tudie t Rutger Univerity. She i the
uthor ofMinority Rules: e Miao and the Feminine in ChinasCultural Politics (Duke Univerity re, 2000) nd the coeditor
with Tim Oke ofTranslocal China: Linkages, Identities, and
the Reimagining of Space (2005).
Librry of Congre Ctloging-in-ubliction Dt
Medi, erotic, nd trnntionl Ai / urnim Mnkekr
nd Loui Schein, ed.
p. cm.
Include bibliogrphicl reference nd index.sB 978-0-8223-4559-6 (cloth : lk. pper)
sB 978-0-8223-4577-0 (pbk. : lk. pper)
1. M mediSocil pectAi. 2. M medi nd the
rtAi. 3. Sex in m medi. 4. Sex in populr culture.
I. Mnkekr, urnim, 1961 II. Schein, Loui, 1957
P96.s452a78 2012
302.23095dc23 2012011624