MECV Industry Day - Home - HMMWV In Scalehmmwvinscale.com/documents/MECV Industry Day 7 Oct... · MECV Industry Day 7 October 2011 M1151 ... APM, HMMWV Modernization 3 Distribution

Serving “Our Army at War -- Relevant and Ready”

MECV Industry Day

7 October 2011

M1151/1152/1165/1167 ECV Chassis MECV

Unclassified

Agenda

0700-0800 – Registration

0800-0805 – Administrative Remarks

0805-0815 – Introduction/PM Remarks

0815-0835 – Acquisition Approach / Schedule

0835-0850 – Scope of Work (Section C)

0850-0910 – Evaluation Criteria (Sections L&M)

0910-0925 – Break

0925-0950 – Testing (Section E)

0950-1015 – Requirements (Automotive & Survivability)

1015-1035 – PM Lessons Learned

1035-1050 -- Break

1050-1105 – Design Chassis Considerations

1105-1130 – Unit Manufacturing Cost (UMC) and Cost and Software Data Reports (CSDR)

1130-1300 – Lunch

1300-1315 – Logistics

1315-1415 – Questions & Answers

1415-1430 – Closing Remarks

Mr. Michael Sprang

Mr. Dennis Haag

Mr. Michael Sprang

Ms. Shannon Jewell

Ms. Patricia Pierce

Mr. Paul Whitney

Mr. Chris Fuchser / Mr. Dan Bock

Mr. Dan Bock

Dr. Greg Schultz

Mr. J.P. Marcoux

Mr. Kevin Ramey

Ms. Michelle Gregory

Mr. Dennis Haag

2 Distribution A, Approved for Public Release

Unclassified

Administrative Remarks Mr. Michael Sprang

APM, HMMWV Modernization


Unclassified

Conference Guidance

Purpose

To provide potential Offerors RFP related information

To improve understanding of the requirements for the development

of the Offerors formal solicitation

To provide forum for questions to be asked

Conference is for informational purposes only

Our intent is to clearly communicate our strategy

Government cannot reimburse costs of solicitation

preparation except as otherwise provided for in FAR Part

31.205-18


Unclassified

Conference Administration

This is a non-smoking facility

Restrooms located in the Joint Dining Facility

Turn off BB and cell phones

One hour and thirty minute break for lunch

Foreign visitors will require an escort at all times

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and Classified Information will not be discussed

Questions are encouraged and expected

Submit all questions on 3X5 index cards provided prior to the lunch break

If the question pertains to information contained on a specific slide, the attendee is asked to place the page number in the upper right corner of the card to assist the staffing and review of each question

Government will attempt to answer as many questions as possible during the Q&A session today

All questions and answers will be posted to the website. They will serve as the official responses.


Unclassified

Introduction / PM Remarks Mr. Dennis Haag

PM, LTV


Unclassified

MECV – What is it?

Program has been over two years in development

Materiel Developer Decision has been approved

MECV is a Competitive Recapitalization Program which

includes integration of modernized technologies

The focus of the program is to upgrade Force

Protection and Performance utilizing proven armor

technologies and integration of non-developmental

items while meeting transportability requirements


Unclassified

PM LTV Mission/Vision

LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLES MISSION

To develop, acquire, produce, field, and sustain safe,

reliable, effective and supportable light tactical

vehicles for the joint war fighting community.

LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLES VISION

Providing our warfighters with superior and

comprehensive program management services, world-

class light tactical vehicles, and responsive life cycle

support.


Unclassified

Management Team

All communication between Government and Industry shall be through the MECV

mailbox: [email protected]

Program Management

Program Executive Office, Combat Support-Combat Service Support (PEO CS&CSS)

PM Tactical Vehicles (PM TV)

PdM Light Tactical Vehicles (PM LTV)

Contracting

Army Contracting Command – Warren (ACC-Warren)

Requirements – User Representative

Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Capability Manager for Transportation (TCM-Trans)

Science and Technology

Tank-automotive and Armaments Research, Development, Engineering Center (TARDEC)

Test Community

Aberdeen Test Center (ATC)

Life Cycle Support and Sustainment

TACOM Integrated Logistics Support Center (ILSC)


mailto:[email protected]











Unclassified

Acquisition Approach Mr. Michael Sprang

APM, HMMWV Modernization


Unclassified

Past experience, recent military vehicles, and industry response to Market Surveys have

contributed to this strategy

Multi-Phase Acquisition Approach

Independent Contracts

• Phase I (RDTE Prototype)

• Phase II (Production)

Phase I : RDTE Prototype Phase

Full and Open Competition

The Government intends to award up to three, Firm Fixed Price, Research Development Test

and Evaluation (RDTE) contracts

The single model to be modernized under Phase I is the M1151A1 (Armaments Carrier)

Contractors will be required to deliver hardware prototypes to Aberdeen Test Center (ATC) for

Government testing within 13 weeks of contract award

Hardware will be tested by the Government to assess compliance with selected requirements to

include automotive performance, Human Factors Engineering (HFE), limited miles, and

survivability

Results will be used by the Government to support authorization for Milestone C and by industry

to support Phase II proposals

11

MECV Acquisition Approach

Distribution A, Approved for Public Release

Unclassified

MECV Acquisition Approach (cont)


Phase II: Planned Production Phase

Single contractor selected shall provide:

• LRIP vehicles to support Phase II testing

• Production vehicles (as options on the contract)

Configuration Management

Logistics Requirements (CLS, TMs, Training)

System Technical Support (STS)

Contractors shall deliver data per the Data Item Descriptions (DID) and

Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)

Details for Phase II RFP will be released as they become available and

posted on the MECV website

12

Unclassified

“The World”

(All interested)

Vendor

A

Vendor

B

Vendor

C

Phase I Evaluation Factors (proposal only):

1. Technical:

1. Crew Survivability

2. System Performance

3. Unit Manufacturing Cost

2. Production Capability

3. Price

4. Small Business

Phase II Evaluation Factors

(Phase I test results & proposal):

1. Technical (Test & Proposal)

2. Contract Price

3. Delivery Schedule

4. Small Business Participation

Single

Best

Value

Acquisition Approach Concept

R&D Contract

Award up to 3

vendors for 4

vehicles, four B-

Kits, and 1

ballistic cab to

support:

LFT&E

DT&E

M&S

Phase I RFP

Phase II RFP

Distribution A, Approved for Public Release 13

Unclassified

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15

3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2

Decision Points

Contracting

Deliveries

Selection Tests LFT&E and

Performance

SSEB

RFP

Production Contract Award (1 ktr)

MECV Program Plan

DT&E

LFT&E

LUE

Phase I Test Vehicles (4 per ktr) PQT / FUSL Test Vehicles

Configuration Lock

Industry Day & Draft RFP release

PQT

FUSL LFT&E

IOT&E

CA – RDTE test vehicles (3 ktrs)

Phase I: RDTE Vehicles SSEB RFP

Phase 2: Production

IOTE / LRIP

PCA

26 Sep 11

LRIP

RFP: Request for Proposal

CA: Contract Award

RDTE: Research Development Test & Evaluation

M&S: Modeling & Simulation

IOTE: Initial Operation Test & Evaluation

SSEB: Source Selection Evaluation Board

DT&E: Development Test & Evaluation

LUE: Limited User Evaluation

Ktr: Contractor

LRIP: Low Rate Initial Production

LFT&E: Live Fire Test & Evaluation

FUSL: Full Up System Level

PQT: Production Qualification Test

PCA: Production Configuration Audit

MS C / LRIP Authorization


14

Unclassified

MECV RDTE RFP Milestone Schedule

The following information is for planning purposes only:

CY 2011

7 Oct Industry Day

10 Nov Final Phase I RFP Release to Industry

CY 2012 / 2013

13 Jan Proposals Due

30 May Contract Award(s), up to 3

5 Sep Delivery of 4 PRVs, 4 B-Kits, & 1 Ballistic Cab to Test Site

10 Sep – 18 Jan ATC Testing (4 PRVs, 4 B-Kits, & 1 Ballistic Cab per

contractor)

1QFY13 Phase II Production RFP Release (est)


Unclassified

MECV Website

Website:

http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/majorsys/mecv/mecv.htm

Website will be continually updated with RFP information such as: Draft Performance Specification (posted)

Draft sections of RFP (posted)

Q&A (when released)

Industry Day Charts

Announcements (when released)

Email: [email protected]

Website will be managed by Army Contracting Command, and their Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist will be the central point of communication with the Government.

List of conference attendees that have agreed to release of their names will be posted

to the MECV website

The official (non-draft) Request for Proposals, once released, will take precedence

over prior information on MECV Website and over Industry Day information

It is the responsibility of Industry to check the website regularly!


http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/majorsys/mecv/mecv.htm












Unclassified

Scope of Work (Section C) Ms. Shannon Jewell

Procuring Contracting Officer


Unclassified

MECV Scope of Work Overview (Section C)

Phase I: RDTE Phase

Start of Work Meeting

Contractors will be issued Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) one week

after contract award

• Depot RECAP vehicles (5)

• Objective Gunner’s Protection Kits (4)

• Pre-Rev B vehicle (SN below 300000) – to support CSDR and Phase II proposal

• Candidate Rev B vehicle – to support CSDR and Phase II proposal

Contractors shall deliver Production Representative Vehicles (PRVs), ballistic cab,

B-kits, BII, and operator’s manuals to Aberdeen Test Center (ATC) NLT 13 weeks

after contract award

Contractors shall provide operator training to Government employees at ATC

Contractors are required to perform maintenance on the vehicles and furnish all

necessary repair parts to keep vehicles operational during Government test

(approximately 20 weeks)

Contractors shall deliver data per the Data Item Descriptions (DID) and Contract

Data Requirements List (CDRL)


Unclassified

MECV Scope of Work Overview (Section C), cont


Single contractor selected shall provide:

• LRIP vehicles to support Phase II testing

• Production vehicles (as options on the contract)

Configuration Management

Logistics Requirements (CLS, TMs, Training)

• Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) anticipated for first two production years until organic

logistics support package is complete

Systems Technical Support (STS) anticipated for first two production years

Contractors shall deliver data in accordance with the Data Item Descriptions (DID)

and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)

Program Reviews to support

• Cost, Schedule, Performance monitoring

• Supportability Development

• Risk Identification, Mitigation, Assessments

• Open Communication


Unclassified

MECV Scope of Work Overview (Section C), cont


Limited Competition between vendors selected in Phase I

The Government intends to conduct a best value trade-off based on an evaluation of

Government inspection results, survivability and performance test results from Phase I,

and proposal evaluations (criteria TBD)

Configuration will be locked at the beginning of Phase II

Production contractor will produce production representative vehicles and Low Rate

Initial Production (LRIP) quantities to support Production Qualification Test (PQT), Full

Up System Level (FUSL) Live Fire Test and Evaluation (LFT&E), Independent

Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E)

• Estimated quantities for test ~ 28 vehicles

• Estimated quantities – 5,750 vehicles at a rate of 3-4 per day

The models to be modernized under Phase II include the Armaments Carrier (M1151),

Shelter Carrier (M1152), Command & Control (M1165), and TOW Carrier (M1167)

Details for Phase II RFP will be released as they become available and posted on the

MECV website

20


Unclassified

Evaluation Criteria

(Sections L&M) Ms. Patricia Pierce

Contract Specialist


Unclassified

MECV Instructions to Offerors (Section L)

Proposals to be submitted only after Final RFP release

Phase I Proposals due approximately 60 days after release of final RFP

Submission of proposals can either be hand-carried or submitted via US mail. Electronic proposals will not be accepted.

No vendor shall receive more than one contract

Section L of the Final Phase I RFP will provide details of the submission requirements

Final RFP posting locations:

ACC-Warren Procurement Network (PROCNET): • http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/majorsys/majorsys.htm

Federal Business Opportunities: • https://www.fbo.gov/


http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/majorsys/majorsys.htm

http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/majorsys/jab/jab.htm

http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/majorsys/jab/jab.htm

Unclassified

Proposal Information per Section L

Four Factors

Technical

Production Capability

Price

Small Business Participation

See Section L for complete Proposal

Instructions

23


Unclassified


Technical Factor:

Offerors shall provide a system description for their proposed MECV sufficient to demonstrate fully

developed solution

Offerors shall provide details on the Armament Carrier and Shelter Carrier (as identified in

Attachment 009)

Sub-Factors 1 & 2 (Crew Survivability, System Performance)

• Fill out Attachment 006 – Vehicle Cone Index (VCI) Data Sheets

• Fill out Attachment 009 – Technical Compliance Matrix

• Fill out Attachment 010 – Vehicle Propulsion Data Sheets

• Fill out Attachment 012 – Phase II Production Unit Manufacturing Cost

Sub-Factor 3 (Phase II Production Unit Manufacturing Cost)

• The Government has determined the Phase II UMC of the MECV is a target cost of $180,000 (A-cab only)

• Fill out Attachment 012 – UMC Phase II Production UMC and provide substantiating information and basis of

estimate for the proposed MECV

NOTE: The Offeror must ensure all Technical data is provided in the correct format, with appropriate markings as

directed under PEO CS&CSS Tactical Wheeled Vehicle (TWV) Security Classification Guide (SCG), dated 6 April 2007

See Section L for complete Proposal Instructions

24


Unclassified


Production Capability Factor:

Sub-Factor 1, Phase I Production Plan

• Offerors shall address the following to meet the Government’s required

delivery schedule for the PRVs:

– Production Approach

– Time Phased Critical Path

– Letters of Commitment

Sub-Factor 2, Phase II Production Plan

• Offerors shall address the following to meet the Government’s estimated

delivery schedule for LRIP and Production schedule:

– Manufacturing Facilities

– Production Approach



Unclassified


Price Factor:

Offerors shall fill out the worksheets in Attachment 013 – MECV

Pricing Worksheet addressing base vehicles (A-cab) , B-Kit, Ballistic

Cab, and Test Support

A Bill of Material (BOM) is required for the Base Vehicle (A-Cab) and

B-Kit

Received proposals that require funding in excess of $4,500,000 will

be considered unaffordable and ineligible for award



Unclassified


Small Business Participation Factor:

All Offerors shall address anticipated US small business concern

participation and subcontracting for the entire MECV Phase I contract

All Offerors shall fill out Attachment 015 – Small Business

Participation Plan



Unclassified

Evaluation Information per Section M

The Government desires to select up to three vendors whose proposal

represent the best value to the Government for the Phase I effort

Section M of the Final Phase I RFP will provide the details of all Source

Selection evaluation criteria

See Section M for complete Basis of Award and Evaluation Criteria


Unclassified

Evaluation Factors for Award (Section M)

Phase I (RDTE Prototype Phase)

Four evaluation factors:

• Technical

• Production Capability

• Price

• Small Business Participation

Relative Order of Importance:


Production

Capability

Crew

Survivability

System

Performance

> >> >

>

Sub-Factors

Unit

Manufacturing

Cost

Technical

> Phase I

Production

Plan

Phase II

Production

Plan >

Price Small

Business

Sub-Factors

Legend

>> Significantly More Important

> More important

Unclassified

Technical Factor – Evaluation of Performance Levels

The Government will assess the proposal risk probability

that the Offeror will achieve the proposed performance level

Threshold and, as applicable, Objective

If Objective Levels are proposed:

And if Government evaluation indicates achievement of the

Objective will be at moderate risk or lower, the proposed level

will be included in any resulting contract, subject to Offeror

opting out

Objectives Listed

•Base Cab Protection (identified in Classified Annex A) – 2 rqmts

•B-kit protection (identified in Classified Annex A) – 1 rqmt

•Speed on Grade (identified in Attachment 001) – 1 rqmt


Unclassified

Small Business References

Confirm each anticipated SB subcontractor’s socioeconomic status

by checking its Central Contractor Registry (CCR) entry at

www.ccr.gov

Prospective small business sources may be located at:

Available Subcontractor List at the TACOM LCMC Small Business Website

• http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/sbo/sbo.htm

Central Contractor Registry (CCR) Website

• www.ccr.gov

SBA’s Dynamic Small Business Search (DSBS) Website

• http://dsbs.sba.gov/dsbs/search/dsp_dsbs.cfm

National Network of Procurement Technical Assistance Centers (PTACs)

• www.aptac-us.org

Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) Website - for SB award recipients,

SB events

• www.fbo.gov


http://www.ccr.gov/

http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/sbo/sbo.htm

http://www.ccr.gov/

http://dsbs.sba.gov/dsbs/search/dsp_dsbs.cfm

http://www.aptac-us.org/



http://www.fbo.gov/

Unclassified

Testing (Section E) Mr. Paul Whitney

Production Quality Manager


Unclassified

MECV Phase I Testing Overview (Section E)

Phase I RDTE Testing

5 Sep 2012 – delivery of 4 PRVs, 4 B-Kits & Ballistic cab to test site

10 Sep 2012 – 18 Jan 2013 at ATC

Four (4) PRVs and One (1) Ballistic Cab

• One (1) Base Cab configuration

– Performance, 3,000 miles endurance and LUE

• One (1) Base Cab with B-Kit to be installed by contractor personnel at test site

– Performance, B-kit Install and Ballistic

• Two (2) vehicles with B-Kit installed prior to test site delivery

– One (1) Performance (B-kit) followed by Ballistic

– One (1) Ballistic

• One (1) Ballistic Cab used for exploitation

Limited User Evaluation (LUE) to be conducted during Phase I

Each vendor will be provided segregated office space, work bays, and secured storage at test site

Each vendor shall provide all required personnel, spare parts, tools, and equipment to support their vehicles during test


Unclassified

MECV Phase I Testing Overview (cont)

Testing will be performed on a staggered basis to relieve burden on the test center; scheduling will be made based upon receipt of all vehicles at the test site.

Vendors are responsible for maintaining their vehicles and keeping them operational during the test period. The Government is not obligated to delay its testing or reschedule events to accommodate failures.

Vehicle modifications during test may be allowed, however the Government is not obligated to extend the schedule to incorporate these changes.

Modifications that are not anticipated to be part of the vendor’s Phase II proposal are not recommended

Test center will generate Test Incident Reports (TIR).

Each vendor will be given access though Vision Digital Library System (VDLS) to obtain copies of their TIRs (unclassified only)

Classified test results/material will be made available through PM LTV

Contractors are expected to submit FACAR, as necessary


Unclassified

MECV Phase I Estimated Test Schedule

Week

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

A-Cab (1)

A-Cab (2)

B-Cab (3)

B-Cab (4)

Exploitation

Cab (1)

35

A-CAB AUTO PERFORMANCE ENDURANCE LUE

B-KIT AUTOMOTIVE PERFORMANCE LUE BALLISTIC

BALLISTIC

BALLISTIC

A-CAB AUTO PERFORMANCE BKC AUTO BALLISTIC


NOTE: Actual timeline subject to change

Unclassified

MECV Limited User Evaluation (LUE)

LUE will be conducted in field environment using representative US

Army personnel, at ATC, and performed within the constraints

specified by the US Army Evaluation Center Safety Release.

Performance vehicles in base cab (A-Cab) configuration at GVW

and B-kit Configuration will be utilized for this effort.

The Government intends to have an out-brief for each vendor with

soldiers to allow vendors to ask questions

The LUE will have three main objectives:

(1) Load Exercise Special Test Event (STE)

The objectives are:

• To determine the operators opinion of the ability of each MECV to store the

required equipment/payload

• To determine the operator’s opinion of the suitability of the planned Basic Issue

Items (BII) items for each MECV.


Unclassified

MECV LUE (Cont)

(2) STATIC STATIONS STE

The objectives are:

• To provide crewmen the opportunity to formulate and execute ingress and

egress procedures through primary and emergency ingress/egress ports to

identify: trip hazards; catch, binding, and snag points; door and handle

operations; step accommodations.

• To provide crewmen the opportunity to examine the suitability, mounting design,

and integration of the Objective Gunner’s Protection Kit (OGPK)

(3) ENDURANCE DRIVE STE

The objectives are:

• To determine the capability of crewmen to ride safely in each MECV.

• To assess comfort and human factor suitability

• To assess seats and restraints

• Location and position of GFE

• To assess the ability to support combat operations, perform external

observation and security


Unclassified

MECV Phase II Testing Overview

Phase II: Planned Production Testing

Scheduled to start 3QFY14 and last approximately one year

Production Qualification Test (PQT)

• 20K Endurance on four vehicles (one per variant)

– With Scoring Conference(s)

• Full Performance Suite

• Transportability

• SAIT (Simulated Airdrop Impact Test) and Low Velocity Aerial Drop

(LVAD)

• Environmental hot/cold

Full Up System Level & Live Fire Test & Evalution (FUSL &

LFT&E)

Initial Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E)


Unclassified

Automotive Performance

Requirements Mr. Chris Fuchser

PM LTV Engineering


Unclassified

Performance Specification Structure

MECV Draft Performance Specification

Main Body Performance Specification (Attachment 001)

Annex A – Survivability

(Classified – will not be discussed today)

Annex B – Operation Mode Summary/Operation Mission Profile (OMS/MP)

Annex C – Basic Issue Items (BII) Listing

Annex D – Communication Equipment Listing & Ancillary Electronic Equipment Listing

Annex E – Single-Pass Vehicle Cone Index (VCI1) Calculation

Annex F – Test Load Plan

40


Unclassified

MECV Performance Specification Definitions & Crew Requirements

Curb Weight (CW) – The weight of the empty vehicle with

integrated base cab protection, Basic Issue Items (BII),

integrated equipment, and full fluids including fuel,

lubricants, and coolants.

B-kit – Removable armor protection kit.

Crew Weight

Troop/Cargo/Shelter Carrier – 2 crew & individual equipment (698 lbs)

4-door variants – 3 crew & individual equipment (1023 lbs)

Not the same thing as vehicle crew capacity!

Crew Capacity •2 crewmembers for Troop/Cargo/Shelter Carrier

•4 crewmembers for TOW Carrier and Command & Control variants

•5 crewmembers (4 + gunner) for Armament Carrier


Unclassified

MECV Performance Specification Payload Definition & Requirement

Vehicle Payload – all items not included in curb weight.

Exception: Payload does not include Crew Weight or B-kit.

Payload examples: • Gunner’s Protection Kit (OGPK/TGPK)

• Spare Tire / Carrier

• All kits (e.g. winch kit)

• Pintle weight for towed load

• Communication equipment and ancillary electronic equipment

• Crew members in excess of those defined in Crew Weight

Required Payload:

4550 lbs for Troop/Cargo/Shelter Carrier

1800 lbs for TOW Carrier and Armament Carrier

2300 lbs for Command & Control variant


Unclassified

MECV Performance Specification Configuration Reference Table

43

MECV Configurations

Base Vehicle

Crew Payload

B-Kit Towed Load

2-door • Troop/Cargo/ Shelter Carrier

4-door

• All 4-door variants

2-door • Troop/Cargo/ Shelter Carrier

4-door

• Armament Carrier

• TOW Carrier

• Command & Control

Curb Weight CW × Essential Combat Configuration

ECC × 2000 lbs 2000 lbs 2000 lbs

Gross Vehicle Weight

GVW × 2

(698 lbs)

3 (1023 lbs)

4550 lbs 1800 lbs 2300 lbs

B-Kit Configuration

BKC × 2

(698 lbs)

3 (1023 lbs)

4550 lbs 1800 lbs 2300 lbs ×

Gross Combined Weight

GCW × 2

(698 lbs)

3 (1023 lbs)

4550 lbs 1800 lbs 2300 lbs ×

Gross Vehicle Weight Rating

GVWR Manufacturer’s maximum weight rating for vehicle


Unclassified

MECV Performance Specification MECV Configurations - Example

If a vendor’s Armament

Carrier weights are…

• CW = 12500 lbs

• B-kit = 2600 lbs

44

…then his MECV configurations will weigh:

ECC = 12500 + 2000 = 14500 lbs

GVW = 12500 + 1023 + 1800 = 15323 lbs

BKC = 12500 + 1023 + 1800 + 2600 = 17923 lbs

GCW = 12500 + 1023 + 1800 +4200 - 420 = 19103 lbs Distribution A, Approved for Public Release

Unclassified

MECV Performance Specification Maximum Curb Weights

Two Weight Constraints:

1: ECC (14,669 lbs max)

= CW + 2000 lbs

45

ECC

Calculation

Combined

Requirement GVW Calculation

(#s in lbs) Max CW Max CW Max CW Crew Payload

Armament

Carrier 12,669 12,669 12,677 1,023 1,800

Command

& Control 12,669 12,177 12,177 1,023 2,300

Tow Carrier 12,669 12,669 12,677 1,023 1,800

2-door 12,669 10,252 10,252 698 4,550


2: GVW (15,500 lbs max)

= CW + crew wt + payload

Unclassified

MECV Performance Specification Transportability Requirements

C-130:

•1 at BKC

•2 at GVW

•1 at GCW

CH-47:

•1 at ECC

Highway Self-Transport (no waivers):

•1 at CW , GVW , GCW

Rail, Marine Transport:

•1 at GCW

•1 at greater of BKC / GVWR

All lifts, tiedowns rated to greater of BKC / GVWR. 46


╕

╕

╕

╕

LVAD:

• GVW from C-130

• GCW from C-17

Unclassified

MECV Performance Specification Mobility Requirements

Assessed at GVW

•5% grade at 45 mph (T), 50 mph at BKC (O)

•Single-Pass Vehicle Cone Index (VCI1) of 31

•Range of 300 miles

•Standard obstacles

–18” vertical step

–Simulated load ramp


Unclassified

MECV Performance Specification Mobility/Performance Requirements

Assessed at GVW (continued)

•Forward speed (62 mph)

•Acceleration (0-30 in 14 s, 0-50 in 42 s)

•Turning radius (25 ft radius)

•NATO lane change (43 mph)

•Approach/departure angles (47/36 degrees)

•Stopping distance (20-0 in 23 ft, 40-0 in 112 ft)

Assessed at BKC

•Like-vehicle towing

•Safe vehicle operation

48


Unclassified

MECV Performance Specification Safe Operation at BKC

Understeer gradient > 1.0 deg/g on turns

Ensures directional stability (controllable steering) on turns

Capable of sustaining 0.4g lateral acceleration on turns

Ensures suspension is properly tuned to minimize chance of rollover

Roll gradient < 12 deg/g on turns

Roll stiffness helps prevent rollover and makes vehicle feel more stable

SAE structural ultimate strength braking test

Evaluates structural integrity of brake system components

Brake Stopping Distance – within FMVSS limits

Ensures vehicle has adequate stopping power

Brake Fade Test – simulated mountain braking (SAE J1247)

Ensures vehicle brake capability retained over multiple stops

49


Unclassified

MECV Performance Specification Electrical Requirements

MIL-STD-1275 compliant (Characteristics of 28V DC Electrical Systems)

All 12V components capable of exposure to 30V

Batteries moved out of crew compartment

Minimum 200 Amp alternator

400 Amp available as kit

All provisions for installing communication equipment

SINCGARS

EPLRS

AN/VIC-3 Intercom system

Provisions to accommodate kit integration of ancillary electronic

equipment

50


Unclassified

Crew Survivability Mr. Dan Bock

PM LTV Engineering


Unclassified

Crew Survivability

Scalable Armor: Base Cab – B Kit

Protection levels defined in classified annex

Levels can be met with “low technology” solutions

Safety Features

Emergency Egress

Fire Suppression

Lessons Learned

52

Base Cab

B Kit

Fragment

Armor

Ballistic Armor

Blast Mitigation Distribution A, Approved for Public Release

Unclassified

PM Lessons Learned Mr. Dan Bock

PM LTV Engineering


THE FOLLOWING BRIEFING IS NOT DIRECTION

This Presentation Only Describes PM’s Lessons Learned

Unclassified

Expeditionary Impacts on the HMMWV Fleet

OEF/OIF – We went to war with the equipment we had

Asymmetric warfare led to field requirements for more armored HMMWVs

A2 fleet – Add on Armor Kits

Some minor changes made to ECV Up Armored fleet, but weight still

managed on 12,100 lbs GVW

Until 2005, PM tried to balance payload with mission requirements

for the ECV fleet

Original agreement – additional kits/”stuff” would come out of payload

(12,100 lbs GVW)

Field pressure for more mission equipment, more protection

PM responded with Frag Kits and added weight

FK 1,2, 5, OGPK – 15,400 lbs GVW

FK 7 – 16,500 lbs GVW

HMMWV fleet – Automotive performance has not kept pace

REV A – some components upgraded to 13,100 lbs rating

REV B – some components to ~14,000 lbs range (tires, steering gear)

ASK – 16,000 lbs springs, added as part of Frag Kit 7

54

Protection


Unclassified

RADIATOR, SHROUD & OIL COOLER Improved cooling & engine performance, reduced noise emission

GEARED HUB ASSEMBLY Improved reliability CONTROL ARMS

Enhanced bushings & Ball joints

SHOCK ABSORBERS * 3-PIECE FRAME RAILS IMPROVEMENT * PITMAN ARM * IDLER ARM * CENTER LINK * CROSS BRACE ASSEMBLY

PARKING BRAKE Dedicated park brake system, for improved grade parking performance

* SERVICE BRAKE Improved GVW Quick Pad Removal * REAR DIFFERENTIAL Improved cooling

•CROSS MEMBERS

*BODY HARNESS

COOL PACK

POWER STEERING PUMP Improved steering performance

*WHEELS - 24 bolt *TIRES –Goodyear MTR •M1114 SPRINGS 16,000K Springs

SHEPPARD STEERING GEAR Reduced steering effort

GEARED FAN DRIVE (GFD)

ENHANCED STEERING GEOMETRY “Static Steer Package”

AIR LIFT BRACKETS

REAR DIFFERENTIAL COOLER

Key: REV A REV B ASK FK 7 Mod

REAR BRAKE LINE MOD

Major Chassis Modifications Since 2005


Unclassified

Current Operations – Vehicles “rated” at 12,100 lbs are being operated at +16,500 lbs

Despite chassis modifications, issues remain, per user observations:

“The truck speed went down and turning radius increased. The weight is too much for the

engine to handle. Engine parts are breaking because of the extra weight added.”

“The vehicle moves slower. The acceleration, ventilation, and air conditioning is not good.”

“Power was a problem. Many times going uphill the vehicle would stall out.”

“The gear box can’t support the added weight. Speed and power of the vehicle are drastically

reduced.”

“There is sluggish acceleration.”

“The engines are not strong enough to handle such a heavy load.”

“Braking is greatly affected and lack of acceleration……..”

“The M1151A1 has decreased acceleration.”

“The vehicle lacks power. It would stall or lose all power (pedal to the floor) and truck goes

nowhere” during missions.”

“The vehicle’s acceleration is much worse and the brakes are not holding up. The vehicle is too

heavy, and needs upgraded brakes.”

56

Net Result - Concerns Remain


Unclassified

Armored HMMWV Weight Growth

57

Nov 05 M1114 Shipped Weight

M1151/2 Rated GVW

UAH FK 5 + OGPK+

w/2300 lbs

M1114 /1151A1

Rated GVW

M1151 CW

FK 5 + OGPK

M1151 FK 5 + OGPK+ FK 7 +w/2300

lbs

Exceed Rim/Tire

Rating LR E

MECV ECC

MECV GVW

REV 0/A

REV B Armament

Carrier CW

MECV BKC 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000

MECV


Unclassified

Lessons Learned – Automotive Current Chassis Limitations

Current Chassis - No efficient growth above

15,500 lbs GVW without major chassis

changes

Based on previous Government Testing,

recommend reviewing the below:

Power Train - Power (speed on grade)

Tires - Soft Soil Operation

Brakes – Safe Operation

Lift/Tiedown Provisions – Transportability

Suspension – Ride Quality, Handling

B-Kit requires Safe Operation,

Transportability – allows for reduced

Performance beyond GVW

58

Components that may be need to be new or modified.

This list is not all inclusive, nor is it

Government direction

15,500 LBS +16,000 LBS

To Meet MECV GVW Performance

the following may need to be

addressed


Unclassified

Chassis Issues that the Government has seen at higher

Weights:

Brake Fade

Wheel overloading (current – 4550 lbs/tire, Load Range E)

Speed restrictions

Hard Slow Speed Steering

Cable chafing (power steering, electrical)

Additional Electrical Power Access

Transmission failures (using engine/transmission to help

with braking effort)

Excessive tire wear (wheel alignment at higher weights)

Accelerated Parts usage (O&S costs)

• Ball Joints, Bushings, Control Arms, Springs, Brake Pads,

Shocks, etc

Suspension “bottoming out”

Cooling System Failures

59

Lessons Learned – Automotive Other Automotive Concerns At Higher Weights


Unclassified

Safety equipment must accommodate soldier usage

Seat belts must account for gear; must be comfortable; must be rapidly releasable and not

hinder rapid egress

Gunner restraint necessary – must allow for freedom of movement

Emergency Egress – Critical!!

Soldiers must have confidence they can get out of a damaged vehicle

Must allow provisions for First Responders to assist in getting soldiers out of the vehicle.

Must be compatible with current HMMWV rescue wrenches

Operation of the egress path must be clearly evident, and operation clearly marked and

easily performed

Multiple routes must be available - at least doors + 1 other routes

Exterior locks must not inhibit egress from inside vehicle

Latches and Hinges

Latches and Hinges MUST be operable after an event.

Hinges have been failure point in theater and test at high weight doors

Latches simple and easy to operate with one hand – no multiple handles or actions

Must keep the door closed during an event, but not jammed after the event (pillar and

header deformation)

Must be able to secure with an external lock (see emergency egress above)

Must be able to “combat lock” (disable external handle from the inside)

If B-kit changes the internal latch, keep soldier familiarity and operation in mind.

60

Lessons Learned – Safety


Unclassified

Automatic fire suppression necessary in both crew and

cargo compartments

Must have back-up manual activation method (interior)

Must have BIT/BITE to monitor/check system

Must use environmentally compliant agent

Manual exterior back up system necessary for First

Responder access

Reduce flammability of internal components (UL 94 –

not FMVSS)

External fire suppression needed in order to allow

dazed crew more time to egress the vehicle or to be

rescued

Keep in mind external flammable component location

as it relates to the crew compartment. Blast events are

random and extreme

61

Lessons Learned – Fire Suppression


Unclassified

“Simple” solutions can be as effective as advanced solutions; provide

very goodmulti-hit performance; low cost armor material; low edge

effect vulnerabilities (generally); but usually weigh more

Protection designed against the threat, not vice versa.

You can not tailor for just one threat – you have to consider others

Minimize behind armor debris (BAD) in overmatching events. Spall

liners are not armor – they only minimize BAD

For blast events, you need shape, distance, and structure

Blast attenuation seats need room to operate

Minimize possible potential secondary projectiles

Be careful of “door sequencing”

Stowed gear needs to be secured so it doesn’t become secondary

projectiles or block egress

The gunners needs “floor” space in order to do their job

Jammers need space and integration, too

Scalable armor is intended to allow for additional protection kits

62

Lessons Learned – Crew Survivability


MECV CHASSIS DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Gregory Schultz

Automotive Instrumentation Division

Oct. 7, 2011

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A, Approved for Public Release

US Army Aberdeen Test Center

64

Suspension Design Choices

• Generally, compromises are required to balance On-road and Off-

road suspension needs

– On-road handling

– Ride quality

– Off-road durability

– Stability

• Design choices include:

– Suspension travel

– Suspension type

– Spring types and rates

– Damper types and rates

– Bump stop types and rates

– Roll center placement

– Roll stiffness/ damping UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A, Approved for Public Release


65

Recent Test Observations

• Most recent tactical vehicles tested use standard on-road dampers

– Usually under-rated for the vehicle weights and ride rates

– Usually have higher rebound than jounce rates (typical on-road design)

• Many vehicles have insufficient suspension travel for off-road, cross-

county and trail driving to allow adequate energy absorption before

bottoming

• Bump stops are too often used as springs

• Good suspensions will greatly improve overall vehicle reliability

• Drivetrain components seem to be under-designed lately

– Probably to save weight



66

Design Considerations (Based on Lessons Learned)

• Position-sensitive dampers (Passive by-pass types)

– Provide different damper rates at different levels of suspension travel

• Multiple zones tuned for appropriate driving conditions

– Possible softer settings at lower suspension travel for improved ride quality

– Mid-range could be somewhat stiffer to help with body roll

– End of stroke could be very stiff to avoid bottoming and absorb energy from more severe

off-road driving

• For off-road driving, consider less rebound and more compression

damping

– Suspension can extend quicker and prepare for upcoming bump

– Compression damping works with springs/travel to absorb energy



67

Design Considerations (Based on Lessons Learned)

• Available Tests that can give Confidence in your solutions

– Pull-to-stall or other drivetrain integrity test

• Gives confidence that drivetrain components can handle loads equivalent to the traction limits

of the tires (e.g. 1g) at wide-open throttle

– Suspension performance driving 15-mph off an 18-inch vertical wall

• Gives confidence that the vehicle will meet ride-quality requirements

• Gives confidence in structural integrity

– ATC/YTC courses and Roadway Simulator are available for contractor

shakedown testing

• Identify design loads


Unclassified

Unit Manufacturing Cost

(UMC) Mr. J.P. Marcoux

PM LTV Business Manager


Unclassified

Unit Manufacturing Cost (UMC)

UMC is a Sub-Factor to the Technical Factor

The Government’s Phase II Production UMC for the MECV Base

Vehicle (A Cab) is $180K (FY10 Constant Dollars)

As stated in L.3.2.3.2, the Offeror shall provide a Phase II UMC

estimate consistent with its proposed MECV

Templates are provided to list the assumptions, source data, and the

detailed methodology (e.g. used prototype cost with adjustments)

used to develop the estimates

Provide both recurring and non-recurring costs

See Sections L&M for complete Proposal Instructions, Basis of

Award, and Evaluation Criteria


Unclassified

Unit Manufacturing Cost Template (Costs Input)


WBS Element NONRECURRING RECURRING Total

Base Vehicle to include the following

Hull / Frame -$ -$ -$

Integral Hull/Frame -$ -$ -$

B-Kit Armor -$ -$ -$

Suspension / Steering -$ -$ -$

Axles -$ -$ -$

Wheel/Tire Assembly -$ -$ -$

Other Suspension Steering -$ -$ -$

Power Package / Drive Train -$ -$ -$

Engine -$ -$ -$

Transmission -$ -$ -$

Other Power Package/Drive Train -$ -$ -$

Auxiliary Automotive -$ -$ -$

Turret Assembly -$ -$ -$

Armament -$ -$ -$

Body/Cab -$ -$ -$

Nuclear, Biological, Chemical -$ -$ -$

Special Equipment -$ -$ -$

Communications -$ -$ -$

Primary Vehicle Application Software -$ -$ -$

Primary Vehicle System Software -$ -$ -$

Software -$ -$ -$

Vetronics -$ -$ -$

Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout -$ -$ -$

Subtotal -$ -$ -$

Reporting Contractor General & Administrative (G&A) -$ -$ -$

Reporting Contractor undistributed Budget -$ -$ -$

Reporting Contractor Management Reserve -$ -$ -$

Reporting Contractor Facilities Capital Cost of Money -$ -$ -$

Total Cost -$ -$ -$

Reporting Contractor Profit/Loss or Fee -$ -$ -$

Total Price -$ -$ -$

Quantity 5750 5750

Unit Cost -$ -$ -$

Attachment 012 - MECV Phase II Production Unit Manufacturing Cost

Unclassified

Unit Manufacturing Cost Template (Documentation Input)


NONRECURRING RECURRING

2 Dr Weight 4 Dr Weight Basis

Base Vehicle to include the following

Hull / Frame (for 4 dr hull/frame - Armaments

Carrier)

Integral Hull Frame

B-Kit Armor (for 4 dr B-Kit weight - Armaments

Carrier)

Suspension / Steering

Axles

Wheel/Tire Assembly

Other Suspension Steering

Power Package / Drive Train

Engine

Transmission

Other Power Package/Drive Train

Auxiliary Automotive

Turret Assembly (excludes GFE gunner's

protection kit weights)

Armament

Body/Cab (for 4 dr Body/Cab weight - Armaments

Carrier)

Nuclear, Biological, Chemical

Special Equipment

Communications

Primary Vehicle Application Software

Primary Vehicle System Software

Software

Vetronics

Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout

Subtotal

Reporting Contractor General & Administrative (G&A)

Reporting Contractor undistributed Budget

Reporting Contractor Management Reserve

Reporting Contractor Facilities Capital Cost of Money

Total Cost

Reporting Contractor Profit/Loss or Fee

Total Price

Attachment 012 - MECV Phase II Production Unit Manufacturing Cost

WBS Elements:Weight

Unclassified

Cost and Software Data Reports

(CSDR)

Mr. J.P. Marcoux

PM LTV Business Manager


Unclassified

Cost and Software Data Reports What Are They?

CSDRs are the primary means by which DoD collects data on the

costs that contractors incur on DoD Programs

This data is invaluable to doing credible cost estimates as using

actual data is preferred

DoD has created the CSDR program to enable the systematic

collection of the cost data

The remainder of this brief discusses the CSDR Plan and the Cost

Reports required under the CSDR program

73


Unclassified

Cost and Software Data Reports Basic Definition

CCDR SRDR CSDR

74

Contractor

Cost Data

Report

Software

Resource

Data

Report*

Cost and

Software

Data Report

*Note: SRDRs are not required on this contract


Unclassified

First step is the creation of the WBS Structure (Attachment 005)

Product-oriented organization of the system and work content

Derived from MIL-HDBK-881A

Serves as the basis for identifying the first three levels of the program

WBS and developing the contract WBS.

Extensions of the WBS can be tailored to the specific program but should

be consistent with MIL-HDBK-881A.

Reference Attachment 005 the CSDR Plan which details the

developed Contractor WBS and the data reporting requirements

75

CSDR Reporting Work Breakdown Structure

Purpose: Achieve a consistent application of the WBS for all

programmatic needs, including cost/hours data collection


Unclassified

CCDR Reporting

CCDRs

CWBS Dictionary CDRL A010

• Lists all WBS elements with a definition of technical content and associated cost content

Cost Data Summary Report (DD Form 1921) CDRL A007

• Summary cost data for all WBS elements on approved contract CSDR plan

Functional Cost-Hour Report (DD Form 1921-1) CDRL A008

• Cost data for specific WBS elements broken down by functional category

76


Unclassified

Attributes of a

Successful Submission

1921 Report

Single file for 1921 report (.xls)

Contract ceiling >= contract

price and/or total price

Contract number and plan

number matches plan

All WBS elements included

from plan

Units reported for all hardware

elements

Sum of children element costs

equal to parent element cost

Nonrecurring Costs + Recurring

Costs = Total Cost

Costs reported for G&A,

FCCM, & Profit

77

Deviation from these standard requirements could

lead to major errors resulting in rejection

1921-1 Report

Single file for 1921-1 report with

separate tabs for each WBS

reporting element requiring

1921-1 reporting (.xls)

Units & costs on 1921-1 match

1921

Nonrecurring Costs + Recurring

Costs = Total Cost

Direct labor hours, dollars, and

overhead reported together

Unclassified

CSDR Plan Attachment 005


A X C: LRIP

B C: PRODUCTION

X INITIAL CHANGE

PROGRAM X PRIME

X CONTRACT SUB

a. CWBS e. SRDR

DICTIONARY FORMATS

X

X

X

1.1.1 1.1.1.1 X

1.1.1 1.1.1.2 X

1.1.2 1.1.2 X

1.1.2 1.1.2.1 X

1.1.2 1.1.2.2 X

1.1.2 1.1.2.3 X

1.1.3 1.1.3 X

1.1.3 1.1.3.1 X

1.1.3 1.1.3.2 X

1.1.3 1.1.3.3 X

1.1.4 1.1.4 X

1.1.5 1.1.5 X

1.1.6 1.1.6 X

1.1.7 1.1.7 X

1.1.8 1.1.8 X

1.1.9 1.1.9 X

1.1.10 1.1.10 X

1.1.11 1.1.11 X

1.1.12 1.1.12 X

1.1.13 1.1.13 X

1.1.14 1.1.14 X

1.1.15 1.1.15 X

Integral Hull/Frame

B-Kit Armor

X

X

Primary Vehicle Application Software X

Communications X

Navigation N/A

Special Equipment X

Nuclear, Biological, Chemical X

Autimatic/Remote Piloting N/A

Automatic Loading N/A

Body/Cab X

Armament X

Fire Control N/A

Turret Assembly X

Auxiliary Automotive X

Other Power Package/Drive Train X

Transmission X

Engine X

Power Package/Drive Train X

Other Suspension/Steering X

Wheel/Tire Assembly X

Axles X

Suspension/Steering X

1.1.1 1.1.1 Hull/Frame X

9. APPROVED PLAN NUMBER

1.1 1.1 Primary Vehicle(Modernized Expanded Capacity Vehicle (MECV) (Phase 1) X X

a.

PROGRAM

A-11-A-C1

(PCR)

Form Approved

OMB No. 0704-0188 COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLAN Attachment 005

X

Refer to

RDT

W56HZV-11-R-

0266

11.

WBS REPORTING ELEMENTS

Modernized Expanded Capacity Vehicle (MECV)

13. REPORTS REQUIRED (X if applicable)

(FCHR)

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 8 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this

burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing

to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION.

1a. PROGRAM (MDAP)

[email protected]

1c. MILESTONE

6c. FAX NUMBER (Include Area Code)6d. E-MAIL ADDRESS

Modernized Expanded Capacity

Vehicle (MECV)

(586) 282-7835

Program Office, LTV

(CDSR)

X

d. DD

1921-2

b. DD

1921

8. PREPARING ORGANIZATION

Modernized Expanded Capacity Vehicle (MECV)

1b. PRIME MISSION PRODUCT

4. CURRENT SUBMISSION DATE (YYYYMMDD)

2. MIL-HDBK-881 APPENDIX USED

Surface Vehicle System

5. LAST APPROVED PLAN DATE (YYYYMMDD)

b.

CONTRACT

6a. POINT OF CONTACT (POC) NAME AND ADDRESS (Include ZIP Code)

David Howey

6501 E. Eleven Mile Road

Warren, MI 48397-50007. PLAN TYPE

6b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code)

(586) 282-8184

1.0

c. DD 1921-1

3. SUBMISSION TYPE

12a.

CONTRA

CTOR

NAME

12b.

CONTRACT

NUMBER

1.0

10. WBS ELEMENT CODE

Unclassified

CSDR Plan Cont’d


Unclassified

CSDR Plan Due Dates

80

d. AS OF DATE e. DUE DATE

(YYYYMMDD) (YYYYMMDD)

1 CWBS Dictionary Initial CWBS Dictionary & CWBS Index 20130103 20130304

2 1921, 1921-1 Final Cost Report 20130103 20130304

A. Non-Recurring/Recurring Definitions - The contractor will utilize definitions within the current Data Item Descriptions (DID) for the Cost Data Summary Report (DD Form 1921),

DI-FNCL-81565B, and the Functional Cost-Hour Report (DD Form 1921-1), DI-FNCL-81566B. Current DIDs are dated April 2007.

DD FORM 2794 (BACK), 20070416 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE Page 3 of 3

14. CSDR SUBMISSION DATES

15. REMARKS

c.

EVENT

a.

SUBMISSION

b.

FORM(S)

C. Special Contractor Instructions: Post Contract Award Briefing must be given by the contrator within 60 days after contract award, to review reports and the process of how data is

captured and reported.

D. DD Form 1921-3 (CBDR): The DD Form 1921-3 is a mandatory requirement for all prime contractors and subcontractors performing work on contracts which contain CSDR

requirements. As such, the contractor must ensure that its FPR business entity submits a completed DD Form 1921-3 within 60 days subsequent to the end of the contractor's fiscal year.

Only one DD Form 192103 is required per FPR business entity, independent of the number of contracts with CSDR requirements held by the business entity.

E. Note: GFE Trucks are being provided from the Red River Army Depot.

respond to the government in their proposal with any differences between their CAS Disclosure Statement and the reporting requirements within each DID.

B. Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) Disclosure Statement Differences - The contractor will complete the 1921 reports by complying with the company's CAS disclosure statement and will


Unclassified

Data Item Descriptions (DIDs)

Provide detailed instructions on how to complete a CWBS Dictionary

and CCDRs

Available via DCARC website:

http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/Policy/CSDR/csdrReporting.aspx

DCARC Website serves as a one stop shop for all issues concerning

the process of report submittals and data requirements for

Contractor Cost Data reporting

The correct DID version for a report can be found in the contract

CDRLs

DIDs are invaluable in describing how to break out recurring and

non-recurring costs

81

DIDs should always be followed when preparing DCARC

documents


http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/Policy/CSDR/csdrReporting.aspx

Unclassified

Logistics Requirements Mr. Kevin Ramey

PM LTV Logistics


Unclassified

Integrated Logistics Support (ILS)

MECV is a recapitalization of Up-Armored HMMWVs which has an

established supportability structure in place.

Multi-phased acquisition strategy prioritizes hardware deliverables

during Phase I with multiple contractors; followed by focused ILS

activities to a single vendor in Phase II.

The Contractor shall maintain the manpower requirements for

operation and maintenance within the current level identified for the

HMMWV FOV (Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic (91B)). The MECV shall

not require any new Military Occupational Specialty (MOS).

Analyze the Design and its support requirements.


Unclassified

MECV Logistics Phase I (RDTE Phase)

Publications/Deliverables:

Provide a MECV Test Manual with each PRV. The hard copy test manual shall include

General Information, Equipment Design, Operating Instructions, Preventative Maintenance

Checks and Services (PMCS), and Basic Issue Items (BII).

Each Basic Issue Items (BII) shall be designed to support one vehicle and consists of

the minimum essential items required to place the MECVs in operation and to perform

emergency repairs.

Test Support for Phase I:

The Contractor shall provide all necessary spare and repair parts required to support

Government testing.

During testing, the Contractor shall provide timely maintenance, all PMCS, and repair support.

Government will provide space for maintenance and storage.

Contractor will install one B-Kit during test. Government will observe and record.

Training for Phase I:

After delivery of the PRVs, the Contractor shall provide operator training at the government

test site. This training shall be up to eight hours in length and cover the basic operation and

maintenance of the PRV. (Training will be Classroom and hands on)

The Contractor shall provide training materiel, both hardware and software, that are unique to

the PRV.


Unclassified

Phase II: Planned MECV Logistics

Contractor shall develop the Logistics Management Information (LMI) Data Products

& Summaries

Contractor shall develop a Logistics Support Package which includes, but is not

limited to:

The detailed maintenance plan

Training documentation

Technical Manuals (Hard copy -10 and -10HR and IETM for all manuals)

Parts Provisioning Documentation

Support Equipment and Special Tools Lists

Initial System Support Package (SSP) /Authorized Stockage List (ASL) / Prescribed Load List

(PLL)

Sustainment Parts Support

Packaging Data

Transportability Data

Logistics Package Testing

Logistics Package Fielding


Unclassified

Logistics Demonstration (LD) Phase II

The Contractor shall participate in and support LD efforts as scheduled by

the Government.

The LD will be held at the Contractor’s facility, estimated length, 30 days.

The LD will include performance of operator tasks and scheduled

maintenance tasks.

Objectives of the LD will be to:

Review system design and identify design or procedure improvements to increase

maintainability

Evaluate the Materiel and its System Support Package

Improve safety while operating and maintaining the system

Reduce time required to perform scheduled maintenance

Record and validate critical logistics data related to the performance of operations

services, and maintenance tasks

Validate procedures and parts support for test

Validate MANPRINT and Human Factors Engineering

86


Unclassified

Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) Phase II

Contractor Logistics Support anticipated for first two production years

until organic logistics support package is complete.

Support provided may include materiel and facilities, as well as

services, in the following areas:

Supply and distribution

Maintenance

Training (Training Materiel, Critical Task List, New Equipment Training

(NET), NET Instructors, Training Devices)

Rebuild/overhaul

Modification

System support


Unclassified

Question & Answer Period Ms. Michelle Gregory

Mr. TJ Kowalski

Systems Acquisition Manager, HMMWV Competitive RECAP


Unclassified

Closing Remarks Mr. Dennis Haag

PM, LTV


Documents

MECV Industry Day - Home - HMMWV In Scalehmmwvinscale.com/documents/MECV Industry Day 7 Oct... · MECV Industry Day 7 October 2011 M1151 ... APM, HMMWV Modernization 3 Distribution