Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MEASURING PERFORMANCE AND RESILIENCY OF TRADE CORRIDORS ITF Transportation Statistics Group
April 10th 2014
Introduction • Tracking the performance of strategic freight routes provides
governments and stakeholders impartial evidence-based results on the competitiveness of Canada’s supply chains
• The Fluidity indicator is a web-based multi-modal tool that measures in near real-time the performance of individual segments of the supply chains as well as the end-to-end transit time of freight flows
• The metric is focusing on bottlenecks and impediments along major trade corridors; with a special attention given to port infrastructure
• Transport Canada’s fluidity indicator enables Canada to measure its own performance and do comparative analysis within the North American marketplace.
Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research 2
Phase 1: IMPORT
SUPPLY CHAIN
Economic Analysis Directorate 3 Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
CORRIDORS IMPORT: ASIA-PACIFIC
PRINCE RUPERT
VANCOUVER • Hong Kong
• Shanghai
• Qingdao
• Tokyo
Calgary
Winnipeg
Toronto
Montreal
Chicago
Economic Analysis Directorate Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
4
PHASE 2 CORRIDORS: CONTINENTAL
Calgary
Winnipeg
Toronto
Montreal
Chicago
• Antwerp
• Valencia
MONTREAL Toronto
Chicago
Phase 2: EXPORT
SUPPLY CHAIN
Economic Analysis Directorate 5 Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
Economic Analysis Directorate 6 Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
CORRIDORS EXPORT: CANADA-ASIA
Rail
Transit
Times
Marine Terminals
Port Metro Vancouver (PMV)
Prince Rupert Alberta
Manitoba
Saskatchewan
Western Canada
Ocean
Transit
Times
Japan
Economic Analysis Directorate Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
7
Rail
Transit Times
Marine Terminal
Thunder Bay Alberta
Manitoba
Saskatchewan
Western Canada
Short Sea
Shipping
Transit Times
Italy
Marine Terminal
Transshipment Port
Quebec City
Baie-Comeau
Venezuela Ocean
Transit
Times
CORRIDORS EXPORT: CANADA-ITALY/VENEZUELA
Examples of TC Fluidity Analysis
Measuring/Analyzing the reliability and variability in transit times
Identification of bottlenecks/impediments
Immediate and residual impacts of disruptions to the transportation network
Estimating border wait times
Measuring carbon footprint
Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research 8
Reliability Total Transit Time from Shanghai to Toronto
via Port Metro Vancouver
2010-2013
9 Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
Year Marine % Change Port % Change Inland % Change
Total
Transit % Change
2010 14.2 - 3.1 - 5.7 - 23.1 -
2011 15.1 5.8% 2.5 -21.3% 5.9 2.0% 23.4 1.2%
2012 15.8 5.0% 2.6 7.7% 6.1 3.4% 24.5 4.9%
2013 15.6 -1.6% 3.0 14.4% 6.3 3.5% 24.9 1.4%
61.6%
13.5%
24.9%
2010
Marine Port Inland
64.4%
10.5%
25.1%
2011
Marine Port Inland
64.5%
10.8%
24.7%
2012
Marine Port Inland
62.6% 12.2%
25.2%
2013
Marine Port Inland
*Totals may not add due to rounding
Reliability Total Transit Time from Shanghai to Chicago
via Port Metro Vancouver
2010-2013
10 Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
61.0%
13.4%
25.6%
2010
Marine Port Inland
63.7%
10.4%
25.9%
2011
Marine Port Inland
65.9%
11.0%
23.1%
2012
Marine Port Inland
64.5% 12.6%
22.9%
2013
Marine Port Inland
Year Marine % Change Port % Change Inland % Change
Total
Transit % Change
2010 14.2 - 3.1 - 6.0 - 23.3 -
2011 15.1 5.8% 2.5 -21.3% 6.1 2.7% 23.7 1.4%
2012 15.8 5.0% 2.6 7.7% 5.5 -9.8% 24.0 1.4%
2013 15.6 -1.6% 3.0 14.4% 5.5 -0.1% 24.1 0.5%
*Totals may not add due to rounding
Reliability/Variability
11 Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
2010 2011 2012 2013
Day
s o
f Tr
ansi
t
Year
Annual Mean and 95th Percentile Time Marine, Port and Rail Segments
Shanghai to Toronto via PMV
Marine Mean
Marine 95th
Port Mean
Port 95th
Rail Mean
Rail 95th
Days of Transit 2010 2011 2012 2013
Marine Mean 14.2 15.1 15.8 15.6
Marine 95th 16.3 18.2 20.2 19.9
Port Mean 3.1 2.5 2.6 3.0
Port 95th 7.0 5.8 6.0 6.8
Rail Mean 5.7 5.9 6.0 6.3
Rail 95th 7.6 7.7 8.4 8.4
12 Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
71.6
47.9 44.5
57.7 63.7
68.5
52.4 52.5 51.7 56.3
64.7
51.9
39.1
28.5
21.7
27.8
25.3
24.2
26.6 24.4
32.5 29.1 26.8
26.9
23.3
25.6
22.2
15.7
6.3
19.7 23.1
16.7
9.2 6.5
12.7 16.6 18.3
14.6 9.8
18.1
26.6
21.3
0.4 4.6 7.1
1.4 0.6 0.6 2.4 1.8 3.2 2.2 2.2 4.4 12.1
34.5
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Jan
uar
y
Feb
ruar
y
Mar
ch
Ap
ril
May
Jun
e
July
Au
gust
Sep
tem
be
r
Oct
ob
er
No
vem
be
r
De
cem
ber
Jan
uar
y
Feb
ruar
y
2013 2014
Pe
rce
nta
ge o
f C
on
tain
ers
Month
Monthly Import Container Dwell at Port Metro Vancouver January 2013 to February 2014
>8 days
5-8 days
3-5 days
0-3 days
Source: Data sample provided to Transport Canada by Port Metro Vancouver
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
Jan
-10
Feb
-10
Mar
-10
Ap
r-1
0M
ay-1
0Ju
n-1
0Ju
l-1
0A
ug-
10
Sep
-10
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0D
ec-
10
Jan
-11
Feb
-11
Mar
-11
Ap
r-1
1M
ay-1
1Ju
n-1
1Ju
l-1
1A
ug-
11
Sep
-11
Oct
-11
No
v-1
1D
ec-
11
Jan
-12
Feb
-12
Mar
-12
Ap
r-1
2M
ay-1
2Ju
n-1
2Ju
l-1
2A
ug-
12
Sep
-12
Oct
-12
No
v-1
2D
ec-
12
Jan
-13
Feb
-13
Mar
-13
Ap
r-1
3M
ay-1
3Ju
n-1
3Ju
l-1
3A
ug-
13
Sep
-13
Oct
-13
No
v-1
3D
ec-
13
Jan
-14
Feb
-14
TEU
Day
s
Throughput
Average Dwell (import Rail Only)
Combining Indicators for Enhanced Analytical Power Container Dwell Time vs. Port Throughput at Port Metro Vancouver
2010 - 2014
13 Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
Choke point identification
CP Strike
Port Utilization Indicators
Monthly Intermodal Indicators (5 container ports)
1. Average Truck Turnaround Time [Min.]
2. Berth Utilization [TEU/meter of workable berth]
3. Average Vessel Turnaround Time [Sec./TEU]
4. Average Vessel Turnaround Time [Hours]
5. Average Container Dwell Time [Days]
6. Dwell Target - % under 72 Hours [%]
7. Port Productivity [TEU/Gross Ha]
8. Vessel On-Time Performance [%]
9. Crane Productivity [Lifts per hour]
10. Number of Vessel Calls [Number/month]
11. Average TEU per Vessel Call [Number/month]
12. Container Throughput [Number/month]
Using Customs data for better planning
15 Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
Canada Border Security Agency
Raw data collection Prior to departure
Transport Canada (Data transformation
and distribution)
Port Authority (Recipient of “cleaned”
data)
Terminal Operators (Data Consumers)
Rail Carriers (Data Consumers)
ALIGNING
PERFORMANCE and
RESILIENCY
Economic Analysis Directorate 16 Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
17
A supply chain is a connected network of suppliers, manufacturers, shippers, distributors and retailers where transportation plays the role of unifying link among all the actors. A resilient supply chain may be defined as one that has the ability to recover quickly from a disruption in order to achieve output at, or near, the pre-event level. Risks to supply chains are potential actions negatively affecting supply chain performance, such as major natural events and operational and economic issues causing lengthy stoppages and/or disruptions. Supply chain vulnerabilities are weak spots within the supply chain, including physical locations (e.g., areas susceptible to floods, avalanches), potential labour disruptions, cyber threats, and choke points
Definitions:
Transport Canada – Centre of Excellence in Economics, Statistics, Analysis and Research (CEESAR)
Purpose of the Initiative: to support Canada’s economic competitiveness by increasing the efficiency of Canada’s supply chains linked to transportation infrastructure
Goals Objectives Outcomes
18
Introduction to Resliency
Transport Canada – Centre of Excellence in Economics, Statistics, Analysis and Research (CEESAR)
Increase the efficiency
of Canada’s
supply chains
Identify vulnerabilities in Canada’s
supply chains linked to multi-modal
transportation and infrastructure
Define when resilience becomes
a system issue requiring
government involvement
Support Canada’s
Economic
Competitiveness
Identify the risks facing Canada’s
supply chains
Develop a framework to assess
economic and competitiveness
impacts linked to resilience
Investigate the role of technologies
and other measures to assist in this
initiative
Identify policies, tools and mitigating
factors to address resilience issues
Develop expertise and predictive
tools using an archive of supply
chain disruptions and their
impact on resiliency
Build supply chain efficiency,
visibility and resilience and
improve Canada’s economic
competitiveness
Improve information sharing
between industry and
government and between
governments
• In the global economy, the role of supply chains has become increasingly important especially for international trade
• The increasing complexity and interconnectedness of global supply chains raises concerns about major disruptions
• The risk of disruptions (natural disasters, extreme weather, sudden demand shocks, cyber security) has been increasing in recent years
• International organizations (e.g., World Economic Forum) are recommending that countries develop strategies around resilience with the aim to build agile, transparent and diversified systems
• While industry has responsibility for the day-to-day efficiency of supply chains, governments are responsible for the broader public goals of managing long-term risks that affect regional and national economies
• To achieve national objectives, governments act as coordinators for supply chain stakeholders, ensuring that the system as a whole is resilient to disruptions
19
Importance of Supply Chain Resilience
Transport Canada – Centre of Excellence in Economics, Statistics, Analysis and Research (CEESAR)
• Transport Canada’s mandate to ensure an efficient, clean, safe and security transportation system provides the policy imperative to address supply chain resilience
• The Canada Transportation Act provides Transport Canada with the authority to intervene to restore supply chain operation in the event of a disruption
• Intervention to improve supply chain resilience tends to fall into four categories:
1) Mitigation
2) Preparedness
3) Response
4) Recovery
• Transport Canada has developed an Emergency Management Framework that addresses 3 aspects of supply chain resilience:
1) Reducing the probability of a disruption
2) Reducing the severity of a disruption
3) Reducing the recovery time after a disruption takes place
20
Source: “Supply Chain Resilience and Economic Impacts of Transportation Disruptions”. Transport Canada Internal Study. March 2012. Roger Roy.
Transport Canada’s Role
Transport Canada – Centre of Excellence in Economics, Statistics, Analysis and Research (CEESAR)
21
Currently 5 primary research initiatives in the Policy Group that address resiliency: 1. Supply chain analysis through the fluidity portal
• Provides end-to-end and segment-specific network visibility • Examines the impact and recovery of specific disruptions on supply chain performance
(see annex for example) • Provides estimates of operational and economic impact of disruptions at various ports • Provides a normative approach to resiliency and evaluation of risks
2. Vulnerability analysis of the rail network linked to geophysical characteristics • Identifies ground hazards linked to vulnerable locations
3. Climate Change Adaptation • Natural Resources Canada/TC assessment of climate risks to the transportation sector • Monitoring of extreme weather conditions and impacts
4. Transportation Resilience in the North • Northern Transportation Action Plan (NTAP) • Analysis of the capacity and resilience of northern supply chains to handle increased activity,
climate change impacts and enhanced connectivity 5. Transpacific Supply Chain Performance
• Research, analysis, and cooperation between TC and Ministry of Transport of China
Current Supply Chain Resiliency Research at
Transport Canada
Transport Canada – Centre of Excellence in Economics, Statistics, Analysis and Research (CEESAR)
22
Differentiation between transportation disruptions and supply chain disruptions: • Transportation (infrastructure) disruptions affect the flow of goods, while supply chain
disruptions affect the supply of inputs or outputs linked to an integrated economic activity
• The resilience of a supply chain and the impacts of disruptions propagate through to other links at a much larger scale
Two measurements of a supply chain disruption: 1) The severity of the
disruption: defines the reduction in performance due to the disruption
2) Time of recovery: defines the amount of time it takes to achieve pre-disruption output levels
Disruption Analysis
Transport Canada – Centre of Excellence in Economics, Statistics, Analysis and Research (CEESAR)
23
World Economic Forum. “Building Resilience in Supply Chains”. January 2013
Case study: Japan • Japan’s GDP contracted 3.7% in the
quarter following the earthquake and tsunami in 2011. It eventually recuperated but supply chains had to be altered.
• Specifically, supply chain disruptions led to a 33% decline in operating profits for a sample of 15 multinational companies in the quarter following the disaster.
Disruption Analysis: Economic Impact of Supply Chain Disruption
Decision makers need to understand the risks of supply chain disruption and the consequences of not intervening.
24
Supply chain vulnerabilities may be classified into 4 distinct categories: 1. Region specific vulnerabilities (i.e., climate, geophysical characteristics) 2. Network specific vulnerabilities (i.e., critical infrastructure, single mode serving a
region) 3. Operational vulnerabilities (i.e., physical disruption, cyber issues) 4. Economic vulnerabilities (i.e., labour disruption with national scope, market volatility)
Example: Analysis of rail network vulnerabilities due to landslides near Ashcroft, British Columbia. Note that both national railways are subject to the same vulnerabilities due to close proximity.
Identification of Vulnerabilities
Transport Canada – Centre of Excellence in Economics, Statistics, Analysis and Research (CEESAR)
25
Current TC initiatives to improve resilience and/or reduce the transportation system’s vulnerability to climate change:
• Continue to support R&D and capacity building in North (e.g. NTAI) • Build and share knowledge on climate risks and adaptation practices with
transportation industry • Opportunities for new TC adaptation initiatives as part of federal adaptation
programming (Proposed MC Spring 2015) • TC proposals could focus on various themes including Supply Chain Resilience
• Climatic changes bring risks that can disrupt supply chains and these risks appear to be growing
• Gradual changes in temperature, precipitation, permafrost thaw and sea level rise
• Increases in the frequency and magnitude of extreme events: flooding, ice and wind storms
• While climate resilience is a key challenge in the North, it is not just a northern issue
Climate Change Resilience and Adaptation
Transport Canada – Centre of Excellence in Economics, Statistics, Analysis and Research (CEESAR)
26
• The northern transportation system is critical to ensuring economic and social development.
• Transportation resilience in the North is affected by similar factors as those impacting southern parts of Canada, but these impacts are exacerbated and its capacity for resilience constrained by: • Underdevelopment (e.g., lack of infrastructure)
• Severe impacts of climate change (e.g., permafrost degradation)
• Increased traffic (e.g., mining, tourism, new marine routes).
• TC’s Northern Transportation Adaptation Initiative helps build resiliency into the northern transportation system by supporting projects that develop adaptation measures/strategies and cultivate northern expertise.
• The Northern Transportation Action Plan focuses on strategic transportation corridors to support community re-supply and resource development
• Target extreme vulnerabilities and deficiencies in northern systems
The Mackenzie River is an essential transportation corridor for the re-supply of communities and resource development projects in the Northwest Territories. Impacts of climate change on the Mackenzie River will have important implications for barge transportation and ferry operations along and across the river.
Source: weather.gc.ca
Transportation Resilience in the North
Transport Canada – Centre of Excellence in Economics, Statistics, Analysis and Research (CEESAR)
27
Proposed Approach in Three Phases:
Phase 1 (internal): • Develop standardized (normative) metrics for measuring
resiliency of supply chains • Define at what stage resilience becomes a system issue –
where the economic risks and market failures necessitate evidence-based government involvement
• Identify the multi-modal static and dynamic (i.e., infrastructure and non-infrastructure) vulnerabilities of our supply chains
• Determine the threshold for government intervention
Phase 2 (internal): • Investigate technologies to improve identification of
vulnerabilities and assist in mitigation and prediction • Involve all Policy Directorates and other federal departments to
allow a reconciliation of objectives among the various groups • Allow for discussions with the Safety and Security Group
responsible for TC Emergency Management Framework Source: IHS Global Insight
Proposed Initiative on Supply Chain Resilience
Transport Canada – Centre of Excellence in Economics, Statistics, Analysis and Research (CEESAR)
28
Proposed Approach in Two Phases: Phase 3 (involves external partners): • Improve the flow of information between industry stakeholders and government, and between
governments (both domestic and international) • Explore predictive analytical frameworks using an archive of evidence-based data sources from
past events • Identify policy actions and tools to deal with specific vulnerabilities and resilience situations
Proposed Initiative on Supply Chain Resilience
Transport Canada – Centre of Excellence in Economics, Statistics, Analysis and Research (CEESAR)
Improvement of resiliency requires collaboration of key stakeholders because it cannot be achieved in isolation.
Budget and Timeline: • 2014-2017 • $150,000 TC R&D Central Fund
Research Project on Supply Chain Resilience
• $100,000 may be leveraged from other government departments
World Economic Forum. “Building Resilience in Supply Chains”. January 2013
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
Day
s o
f Tr
ansi
t
Week of the Year
2012 Weekly Rail Transit time: PMV to Various Destinations
Destination 1
Destination 2
Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
Quantify immediate and residual impacts of disruptions on the rail network such as strikes and/or weather events.
9-day strike: May 23, 2012, Week 20
Return to Normal: Week 28
Residual effects Trend
Source: Transport Canada Fluidity database. Please note the data presented is an aggregate of
both class 1 rail carriers. 29
Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research 30
Estimating Southbound Truck Border Wait Times Using Geospatial Data
Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research 31
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
0:00 0:05 0:10 0:15 0:20 0:25 0:30 0:35 0:40 0:45 0:50 0:55 1:00 1:05 1:10 1:15 1:30
Tru
ck
Tri
ps
Wait Times (min)
Figure 7. Geospatial Analysis - Histogram of Border
Wait Times
Frequency
median=13.8
Source: Transport Canada
mean=16.4
standard deviation=14.8
95th percentile
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Economic Analysis Directorate 32 Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
• The fluidity indicator is evidence-based information to assess and analyze the efficiency of our supply chains.
• The project assists Transport Canada’s work on the identification of constraints in the transportation system.
• It provides strategic information on the resilience of our supply chains by measuring the recovery rates of the supply chains after major disruptions.
• It is a horizontal project serving other government departments and initiatives: – Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade and
Development: Investment, Trade and Pre-clearance Files – Public Safety: Critical Infrastructure – Infrastructure Canada – Provincial Governments: BC and Saskatchewan – Foreign Governments: United States and Japan
33 Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research
Fluidity Web Portal
Here’s what you see when you login onto the Fluidity Web Portal application.
Login procedures are provided by Transport Canada.
THANK YOU
Economic Analysis Directorate 35 Transport Canada - Economic Analysis & Research