14
Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS University of Colorado Denver

Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT)

Tamara MilbournLead Evaluator eCALLMS

University of Colorado Boulder

Dr. Kara ViescaLead PI eCALLMS

University of Colorado Denver

Page 2: Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

Overview

•What is LRT?

• Our LRT survey

• Some initial data analyses (with your help)

• Future steps and opportunity to participate further!

Page 3: Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

What is LRT?

• If someone described a teacher’s teaching as “linguistically responsive”, what would that mean to you?

• If you walk into a classroom of a teacher, what would you observe that would tell you she is linguistically responsive? What would you observe that would tell you she isn’t?

• What do you think is the most important thing for teachers of multilingual learners to know and be able to do? How could a teacher learn to do it?

Page 4: Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

Lucas, Villegas & Freedson-Gonzalez (2008); Lucas & Villegas (2011)

Page 5: Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

Concerns with this LRT Framework

•Current thinking in language development

• Assessment

Page 6: Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

Our LRT Survey

• Item Development• Field Test– Current version• 13 demographic items• 16 constructed response items• 178 fixed-response items

– 32 completed responses• Eventually four 20-item forms

Page 7: Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

LRT Worksheet Subdomains

1. Sociolinguistic Consciousness

2. Scaffolding Information

3. Identifying the Language Demands of Classroom Tasks

Page 8: Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

Evaluating Responses Worksheet1. Work individually, in pairs, or in groups2. Read survey question3. Read and score the 5 responses (keep in mind the

subdomain):3 = Expert 2 = Competent 1 = Emerging 0 = Not Observed

4. Note any comments or questions6. Discuss as large group

Page 9: Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

Scale

3 = Expert 2 = Competent 1 = Emerging 0 = Not Observed

Page 10: Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

_ No, students should be using both language./Students need to create their own identity and use the language that best fits them.

_ No. Many time parents think they are helping the child, but they are teaching the child incorrectly./I would have the parent speak the native language. It is hard to unteach what a parent thinks is correct.

_ I would say to support each other with their learning, and to practice together, but the focus should be on continuing to develop their child’s first language. However, I would let the parent know that my opinion should not be the basis for their decision. If the family feels it is better to only speak English at home, then I would respect their decision./Language is part of a child’s culture….I respect parents and the choices they make for their families.

_ I would say that it would benefit to speak English but only speaking English is not necessary./Because their home language is still important and should be valued.

_ I would say that only speaking English at home may contribute to the deterioration of the student’s primary language, which is not something the parent would want to do./I think it[‘]s important to work to change society and remove the power structures associated with language.

Page 11: Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

_ In order to get stronger you need to take steps, building upwards on knowledge.

_ To create access to meaning from adapting the text, providing visuals, using realia, activation prior knowledge.

_ Teaching students where they are.

_ Scaffolding meanings to build up the concept in a variety of ways using many different strategies to help kids understand.

_ Providing support to those who need it until they can do it on their own.

Page 12: Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

_ I would try to connect the text to my MLL students and use that to build upon the lesson.

_ I would read the text and look for vocabulary that may need front loading translation, similar words, or pictures that I could use in large groups before using the text.

_ For the past 8 years, I have only taught math and science.

_ First I would read the text through the lens of a language learner. Next, I would determine what I want kids to know and be able to do and say by the end of the lesson. Then, I would determine which scaffolds need to be put in place to help kids access the text be successful with the end goal.

_ I would modify the activity to include areas where the students are able to talk to one another. I would also create part of the lesson to include some type of visual.

Page 13: Measuring Linguistically Responsive Teaching (LRT) Tamara Milbourn Lead Evaluator eCALLMS University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kara Viesca Lead PI eCALLMS

Future Steps

•More analysis• Connection between theory, scores and

practice•More data gathering

Implications

Questions?