Upload
zachary-mackenzie
View
232
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Measurement Model
Historical Cost
Current Cost (CAA) Prepared by:
Carly Wong Ingrid Yeung Carmen Wong Priscilla Wong
Historical Cost Model
Historical Cost Model
The model has been around since the 1400’s
Until after WWII, inflation was not really part of our economic environment
The essence of the model is that all transactions are recorded at their acquisition or original cost
Historical Cost Model (Cont’d)
Form of payment is irrelevantAssumes aggregation of monetary units
from different periods acceptableAcquisition cost of depreciable assets is
allocated over asset’s effective service life– Historical cost depreciation is matched against
current dollar revenue creating an illusory net income component
Argument for Historical Cost
Historical cost is relevant in making economic decisions
Decisions making concerning future commitments => need data on past transactions as the basis for judging
History cost is relevant for decision making1. Affecting evaluation and selection of decision rules
=> historical cost is directly related to past decisions => determine the quality of the past decision=> serve as a basis for the forecast
2. Providing input to the “satisficing” notion=> decision makers do not seek to optimizes but to satisfice => consider how much earned rather than how much can earn
Historical cost is relevant in making economic decisions
3. Imposing on the decision maker by their environment
=> employed many different contexts
e.g. taxable income , cost-plus contracts
Historical cost is based on actual, not merely possible transactions
Record of the actual transactions=>supporting documents are provided=>determining how effectively management has met its responsibilities=>increasing the accountability-primary objective under stewardship function
Current cost or exit price accountingBasis of year end market prices without
reference to actual transactions
Throughout history, financial statements based on historical cost have been found to be usefulFinancial reports based on historical cost useful
for over the yearsModern industrial and managerial accounting
practices based on trial and error for many years
=> not useful => changed
The best understanding concept of profit is the excess of selling price over historical cost Profit is accepted as a measure of successful
performance Profit requires sufficient use of time , place and form be
added to the materials, products or services purchased above the cost
Historical cost is the basis idea of profit E.g. decision on whether continue a product line or not
depends on the favorable spread between revenue and cost
Accountants must guard the integrity of their data against internal modification
Historical cost is less subjective to manipulation than current cost or selling price.
Littleton => these are still wholly outside the prior decisions and the recorded experience of the enterprise
Accountants must guard the integrity of their data against internal modification
Mautz => whom would you trust to value the assets of any major company, how are current values to be determined, how would an accountant ascertain that the values are a fair presentation, can an accountant withstand the pressure by managers to accept optimistically valued assets?
How useful is income information based on current cost or exist price
Is it useful to show as income an increase in the value of an asset that the firm has no intention of selling?
If the price of an asset at the end of the year is lower than it was during the year, this encourages criticism of management by shareholders for not having disposal of the asset earlier.
How useful is income information based on current cost or exist price
Current cost and exist price accounting induce a short-term view of profits.
In many cases, management may believe that disposing of assets is not the more profitable alternative – reasons for holding an asset other than realizing an immediate profit.
Changes in market prices can be disclosed as supplementary data
Historical cost does not differ materially from current cost.– Supplementary data on current prices are a practical
and sufficient way of dealing with such information without having to shift from historical cost to a current cost basis.
– Adopted by the Australian Accounting Standard setters in 1976.
• Supplementary statement in addition to their conventional financial statement
Changes in market prices can be disclosed as supplementary data
Based on studies of the relationship between accounting data and the market reaction to the data, the efficient markets hypothesis in semistrong form states that security prices always reflect publicly available information.– Implying that the method of disclosing any
information including current values, whether shown in the text of the financial statements, as a footnote, or as supplementary data, makes no difference to the market.
There is insufficient evidence to justify
rejection of historical cost accounting
Most of the research studies indicate that current cost data do not provide any more information than historical cost data
Traditional accountants argue that there is no persuasive empirical evidence that indicates that current cost or exist price accounting information is more useful than historical cost information
Criticisms of historical cost accounting
Objective of accounting
Provide useful information for economic decision making is taken to mean providing information to the stewardship function of management.– Historical cost accounting reveals that the
primary role of accounting is to meet the decision-making needs of users
– Forward-looking decision-usefulness approach
Objective of accounting
Information on the stewardship function does not necessarily restrict accountability to the original amounts invested directly or indirectly by equityholders.
Investors are interested in knowing about the increases or decreases in the value of their investments as represented by the net assets of the company
Objective of accounting
Historical cost system fails in its underlying function of providing objective information.– It is far from objective and is open to manipulation
– Monograph 10 questions the validity of the historical cost information and attacks a basic tenet of the system, which is that historical cost information ensures the maintenance of an entity’s capital base.
Information for decision making
Historical cost=> management needs historical cost data in order to evaluate their past decisions as they contemplate future commitments
Past decision was right or wrong must ultimately be ascertained by what happens in the marketplace
Historical cost has usefulness, but it is insufficient for the evaluation of business decisions.
Information for decision making
Historical cost accounting adopts a financial capital concept.
However, capital regarded as the nominal dollar investment in the firm rather than the purchasing power of the investment. After the year of acquisition, historical costs do not correlate with the events of the year.
Information for decision making (Cont’d)
Historical cost overstated income in a time of rising prices because it offsets historical cost against current inflated revenue.
Highly questionable for the relevance of historical cost for decision making.
Basis of historical cost
Historical cost is under the ‘going concern’ assumption
Sterling => questions the validity of the assumption– The high rate of business failure would make
it difficult to build an evidential case for a projection of continuity. No business has ever continued ‘indefinitely’ into the future.
Historical cost under attack
Balance sheets contain outdated cost prices or valuations => hardly to say to be true and fair
A lot of departures – All non-financial assets of GTEs be measured using
‘deprival value” concepts
– Liabilities be measured using present value
Departures provide more relevant information than historical cost
Notions of investor needs
Historical cost cause either a distortion or concealment of important company disclosures=> goal of conventional accounting are ill-conceived – Because accountant:
• Have naïve, simplistic view of investor and their needs• Accept old-fashioned, fundamentalist view
Share market analysis and corporate analysis are different– Market analysis mainly of trying to ascertain what other
investor are thinking– Corporate analysis not really concerned about corporate
facts but about the psychology of the market
Matching
Going concern assumption does not underlie the use of historical cost
Matching concept-when revenues are earned, the expenses incurred in earning those revenues are matched (offset) against the revenues to calculate income
Conventional accounting puts emphasis on deciding whether a cost should be deducted form revenues in the current period or be deferred to future periods=>responsible for deferred charges and that are not
assets and deferred credits that are nor liabilities
Matching
Decisions are based on the matching principle
=> in most cases the matching of costs and revenues is a practical impossibility
e.g. cost allocation- not capable of being verified or refuted because there is no way to select one method over another except arbitrarily
Current Cost Accounting (CCA)
Definition of current cost accounting
a cost calculated to take into consideration current circumstances of cost and performance levels
adjusting to constant purchasing power by using the average inflation rate in the current year
Business Profits
composes into 2 parts– current operating profit – realizable cost savings
Current operating profit:– excess of the current value of the output
sold over the current cost of the related inputs
Realizable cost saving:– increase in the current cost of the assets
held by the firm in the current period– both realized and unrealized cost changes.
Business Profits
– realizable cost savings = holding gains/losses
– Holdings gains: • a saving attributable to the fact that the
input was acquired in advance of use• this savings is attributable to holding
activities.
Why we need to measure separately?
Holding assets and liabilities enhance the firm’s market position
managers and others want to know if these holding activities are successful
Under the conventional accounting gains are only recorded when the assets are disposed impossible to show it unless assets are bought and sold mislead the investor to determine which firm is more efficient
Assumption of the CCA
Without the measurement of the holding gains/losses
confuse the evaluation of management decision
hinders the allocation of resources in the economy
CCA suggest that separation of holding gains and operation profits gives credit to the appropriate managers
Financial Capital Concept vs. Physical Capital Concept
CCA provides more useful information than conventional accounting
supports can be divided into 2 camps– those who believe in the financial capital
concept
– those who believe in physical capital concept
Difference: “whether or not holding gains or losses are included in income”
Financial Capital
firm invests financial resources with the expectations that the investment will create a higher level of cash inflow
recovery of the amount of financial resources invested is a return of capital
cash flows in excess of the amount financial resources invested are a return on capital
holding gains cost savings and the increases in future cash flow of the assets
Physical capital
physical units denoting the firm’s operating capability
emphasize on the need to know the firm’s operating capability has been maintained continue in businesses
the holding gains capital maintenance adjustment
Argument Against CCA
Realization principle– it violates the traditional realization principle– because the changes in market price of the
assets in use is irrelevant– fixed asset is not more valuable to a firm
simply because its current cost has risen– asset value lies in its service potential, not its
market value
Argument Against CCA (Cont’d)
Subjectivity– another problem is the subjectivity of
determining the amount of the increase in cost– if there is no reliable secondhand market,
current cost must be the new asset expected to replace the old one
– adjustment has to be made between the actual asset and the replacement
– it is difficult to calculate
Argument Against CCA (Cont’d)
Subjectivity– another problem is the subjectivity of
determining the amount of the increase in cost– if there is no reliable secondhand market,
current cost must be the new asset expected to replace the old one
– adjustment has to be made between the actual asset and the replacement
– it is difficult to calculate
Argument Against CCA (Cont’d)
viewpoint of exit price– cost implies opportunity cost or sacrifice of
the next best alternative– current sacrifice faced by a company is to sell
the asset rather than use it– but not to purchase the item because company
has already owned it – so current cost, which is the price to purchase,
is irrelevant
Argument Against CCA (Cont’d)
Allocation problem– allocation of current cost is arbitrary and lack
in real-world counterparts– backlog depreciation is charged to income or
to a capital account– cause difference in amount of income reported
Argument Against CCA (Cont’d)
Technological changes– improved assets will more than likely replace
existing assets– so current operating profits would be poor
predicators of future profits– investors would be misled by the current
operating profit as a basis for predicting future cash flows
Argument Against CCA (Cont’d)
Sum up:– current cost information is irrelevant to most
investment decisions– it does not focus on the firm’s ability to
command financial resources in the firm’s quest to adapt itself to the environment
Argument For CCA
Recognition principle– current cost accounting violates the conventional
principle of recognizing a holding gain only for unrealized holding gains from a financial capital view
– unrealized holding gains represent actual economic phenomena occurring in the current period
– therefore should be recognized if there is sufficient objective evidence to support the price changes
Argument For CCA (Cont’d)
Recognition principle (cont’d)– market price of fixed assets are not relevant – however, whether the firm intends to use or
sell a fixed asset is not pertinent – the change in the price of the asset is relevant– determination of periodic income should be
based on what actually happened in the current period, not on what might occur
Argument For CCA (Cont’d)
Subjectivity– current cost accounting lacks objectivity?– current cost is not based on actual transactions in
which the firm is a participant– however, objectivity is relative– even under conventional accounting, some figures are
more objective– therefore, the question is whether current costs meet a
certain minimum level of objectivity that the accounting profession is willing to accept
Argument For CCA (Cont’d)
Subjectivity (cont’d)– market prices are relatively easy to obtainthe objectivity of their current costs would be
acceptable– E.g current cost of fixed assets can be obtained
from secondhand dealers– No market prices are availableappraisals, calculations of reproduction costs
and use of index numbers
Argument For CCA (Cont’d)
Viewpoint of exit price– Value at exit price is unusual because the firm is
normally a buyer
– utilizing exit prices when liquidation is not contemplated is misleading
– e.g. a customized asset used by the company is of great value, but when a firm is under liquidation, the value of the asset is greatly reduced as it is customized for the company’s own use
Argument For CCA (Cont’d)
Viewpoint of exit price (cont’d)– however, the company decides to keep and use
its assets rather than sell the asset– because the management of the company
believes its value in use is greater than its exit value
Argument For CCA (Cont’d)
Allocation problem– allocation problem exists in most accounting
method, even the conventional historical cost accounting also has the allocation problem
Argument For CCA (Cont’d)
Technological changes– current operating profit = indication to make a
positive long-term contribution to the economy
– it also indicates that the production process in use by the firm is effective
– if profit > interest earned on the net assets at current cost
the existing production process is worth continuing
Argument For CCA (Cont’d)
Technological changes (cont’d)– current operating profit is primarily representative of
the long-term profit capability of the firm under the existing production process, assuming that existing conditions remain relatively the same
– the technological changes are not taken into account
– When a new machine changes the cost of production, the price of the old must adjust
the price of the old asset reflects the technological change
Conclusion
current cost accounting performs significantly better than historical cost income
because historical cost accounting fail to adjust for inflation
No doubt, CCA data provide useful information to managers
Conclusion (Cont’d)
Question: whether benefits exceed the cost of gathering the information?
On a cost-benefit basis– historical cost information are almost provided
in the capital marketsObjectivity:
– information obtained from genuine transaction that have occurred
– Information is capable of being verified
Conclusion: Historical Cost Accounting is better