18
Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

Meaningful Citizen Engagement

Tim Woods

March, 2009

Page 2: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Old School…

“Neither starting-place nor appointed destination…

and where the enterprise is to keep afloat on an even keel.”

Michael Oakeshott

Page 3: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Today…

“We seem to be moving towards a different kind of system

in which working directly with the public may be just as important

as representing their interests.”

Steve Burkholder, Mayor of Lakewood, California

Page 4: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Challenge:

How to integrate public opinion and public input into the decision making process.

Page 5: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Two Kinds of Leadership

1. Decide, Advocate, Defend Leader reviews options & champions the ‘right policy’

2. Inclusive, Dialogic, Genuine process Leader champions the ‘right process’ – to harvest

energy, creativity and wisdom of the whole community

Page 6: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Citizens….Ignore Them at your Peril

Government is a service sector…and expectations are high and getting higher

Being consulted is one of the metrics of modern ‘service’

Satisfaction with government service translates into legitimacy for government

Page 7: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Use Citizen Power…

Citizens hold progressive values…that can sustain

progressive policies and politicians.

Page 8: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Purpose of Public Participation

Public preference plays a part in decisions Adds local knowledge to decision-making Fairness and Justice Lends legitimacy for policy decisions Legal Requirement

Page 9: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Public Hearings: Nobody Listens, Nobody Cares

Only the protagonists/antagonists participate Format promotes confrontational politics

Battleground rhetoric, media coverage Format is all about power relationships Undermines faith in governance Propels elected officials to adopt ‘decide + sell’ strategy

Page 10: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Citizenship 2.0

Citizens are: Highly Educated

Informed, Access to Expertise On-line

Connected at home and at work Self-organizing

Blogs, twitter, social networking

Page 11: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Public Participation 2.0….Collaborative Participation

‘Return on Participation’ Transparency of process and purpose Search for solutions Dialogue that is constructive and reshapes

perspectives Builds trust among stakeholders Develops networks among participants

Decisions that are understood and respected

Page 12: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

So What’s the Difference???

One Way Talk…

Elite or Self-selected…

Reactive/Controversial…

Knowledge Transfer…

…Dialogue

…Diverse Participants

…Ongoing Exchange

…Knowledge Exchange

VS.

Page 13: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Davis, California….yes we can

Voters reject a tax increase…leaving multi-million dollar deficit to repair

City council appoints Citizen Budget Commission – with representation from ‘tax hike, service cuts champions along with city staff, other representative community voices

Commission learns about budget, programs, services Result: unanimous agreement, and ratified by voters

Page 14: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Blockages Along the Way

Sharing influence with citizens perceived as a threat Lack of collaborative skills, officials, public Busy citizens have limited time Cost of designing, staffing more genuine efforts Partisanship is embedded A more legitimate voice for citizens is not in the comfort

zone of the political right

Page 15: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Methodologies at a Glance

Deliberative Polling Appreciative Inquiry Choice Work Sustained Dialogue

Page 16: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Your City’s Website:Open for Citizen Input?

Home page – “Have Your Say”

Mandate – what’s up? Process overview … how

process fits into decision-making

Timelines

Meetings…format, timing, location

Publications …research, consultation process, access to submissions

Participation …by email, in person, submissions

Contact information

Page 17: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Useful Links

www.deliberate.ca The Deliberation Network. Find case histories, links to dialogue methodologies

www.c2d2.ca Canadian Community for Dialolgue & Deliberation

www.thataway.org US-based equivalent to c2d2 with enormous resource library

Coming to Public Judgment, Daniel Yankelovich

Page 18: Meaningful Citizen Engagement Tim Woods March, 2009

The Deliberation Network, March 2009

Tim Woods, [email protected]: 250 388-4915 Fax: 250 388-4916Cell: 250 480-6668