mcqspermretrievaltechniques-120620141912-phpapp02

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/16/2019 mcqspermretrievaltechniques-120620141912-phpapp02

    1/4

  • 8/16/2019 mcqspermretrievaltechniques-120620141912-phpapp02

    2/4

    0!1 2 – Sperm Retrieval Techniques

    he following techni&ues can be used to retrieve sperm in men withnonobstructive azoospermia:

    a) 34/A (percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration)

    b) 0icro#4/4 (microdissection testicular sperm e%traction)

    c) 4/A (testicular sperm aspiration)

    d) !onventional 4/4 (testicular sperm e%traction) using single ormultiple biopsies

  • 8/16/2019 mcqspermretrievaltechniques-120620141912-phpapp02

    3/4

    0!1 5 – Sperm Retrieval Techniques

    he following statements apply to sperm retrieval techni&ues:

    a) 0icro#4/4 yields higher sperm retrieval success rates thanconventional 4/4 or 4/A

    b) 34/A is a fast" effective and safe method to retrieve sperm in

    obstructive azoospermia 4%pertise in microsurgery is re&uired for34/A

    c) 4/A is safe and effective in cases of failed 34/A $o e%pertise inmicrosurgery is re&uired for 4/A

    d) 04/A is indicated in obstructive azoospermia /perm retrieval ratesare comparable to 34/A although higher sperm number is obtained

  • 8/16/2019 mcqspermretrievaltechniques-120620141912-phpapp02

    4/4

    0!1 6 – Sperm Retrieval Techniques

    Overall" sperm retrieval success and pregnancy rates by .!/. (usingretrieved sperm) in men with obstructive (OA) and nonobstructive($OA) azoospermia are:

    a) 7+, and 5+," 8+, and 27," respectively

    b) 9+, and 6+," 7+#;+, and 27," respectively

    c) 7+, and 5+," respectively" and rates are not dependent on the typeof azoospermia being obstructive or nonobstructive

    d) *++, and 7+, in OA men with vasectomy" and +, in $OA men with

    testicular histology showing germ cell aplasia (/ertoli cell#only)