McKinley v CFTC SEC Defendant Motion to Extend Time (Lawsuit #5)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 McKinley v CFTC SEC Defendant Motion to Extend Time (Lawsuit #5)

    1/3

    1

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    __________________________________________

    )

    VERN MCKINLEY )

    )Plaintiff, )

    )v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1176 (RWR)

    )

    COMMODITY FUTURES )TRADING COMMISSION et al. )

    )

    Defendant. )

    __________________________________________ )

    MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME

    Defendants, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and

    Exchange Commission (Defendants), by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully request

    a thirty (30) day enlargement of time up to and including September 24, 2012, to file an answer

    or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this case. Good cause exists to grant this motion.

    1. Undersigned counsel was recently assigned the instant matter.

    2. Accordingly, undersigned counsel established contact with the two agency

    counsel regarding the underlying allegations in Plaintiffs Complaint and counsel is in the

    process of fully investigating the allegations.

    3. Defendants, however, have been unable to obtain all the information needed to

    respond to Plaintiffs Complaint.

    4. Furthermore, Defendants anticipates producing records in the coming weeks

    which may narrow the issues before the Court.

    Case 1:12-cv-01176-RWR Document 4 Filed 08/22/12 Page 1 of 3

  • 7/31/2019 McKinley v CFTC SEC Defendant Motion to Extend Time (Lawsuit #5)

    2/3

    2

    5. Finally, undersigned counsel will be out of the office August 27, 2012 through

    September 4, 2012.

    6. Accordingly, Defendants now requests a thirty (30) day enlargement of time, up

    to and including September 24, 2012, to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in

    this case.

    7. Defendants request this extension in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

    This is Defendants first request for an extension of time in this action and the requested relief

    will not affect any other deadlines currently imposed by the Court.

    8. Undersigned Counsel contactedPlaintiffs Counsel regarding the instant motion

    and Plaintiff opposes the requested relief.

    9. Defendants, however, request that the Court grant their Motion for an Extension

    of Time and enter the attached Order.

    WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that the Court grant their Motion for

    Extension of Time and allow Defendants up to and including September 24, 2012, in which to

    file their Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

    * * *

    Case 1:12-cv-01176-RWR Document 4 Filed 08/22/12 Page 2 of 3

  • 7/31/2019 McKinley v CFTC SEC Defendant Motion to Extend Time (Lawsuit #5)

    3/3

    3

    Dated: August 22, 2012,

    Washington, DC

    Respectfully Submitted,

    RONALD C. MACHEN JR., D.C. BAR#447889

    United States Attorneyfor the District of Columbia

    DANIEL F. VAN HORN, D.C. Bar #924092Acting Civil Chief

    By:/s/ Carl E. Ross ____________ ___

    CARL EZEKIEL ROSS, D.C. Bar #492441Assistant United States Attorney

    Civil Division555 4th Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20530

    Tel: (202) 305-4851

    Fax: (202) 514-8780

    Attorneys for Defendant

    Case 1:12-cv-01176-RWR Document 4 Filed 08/22/12 Page 3 of 3