Upload
sahil-ahuja
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 1/ 49 ⇒|
Principles of Multicarrier Modulation andOFDM a
Lie-Liang Yang
Communications Research GroupFaculty of Physical and Applied Sciences,University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Tel: +44 23 8059 3364, Fax: +44 23 8059 4508
Email: [email protected]
http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk
aMain reference: A. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 2/ 49 ⇒|
MC Modulation and OFDM - Summary
❐ Principles of multicarrier (MC) modulation;
❐ Principles of orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM);
❐ Inter-symbol interference (ISI) suppression;
❐ Implementation challenges.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 3/ 49 ⇒|
Multicarrier Modulations - Introduction
❐ In multicarrier (MC) modulation, a transmitted bitstream is divided into manydifferent substreams, which are sent in parallel over many subchannels;
❐ The parallel subchannels are typically orthogonal under ideal propagationconditions;
❐ The data rate on each of the subcarriers is much lower than the total data rate;
❐ The bandwidth of subchannels is usually much less than the coherence band-width of the wireless channel, so that the subchannels experience flat fading.Thus, the ISI on each subchannel is small;
❐ MC modulation can be efficiently implemented digitally using the FFT (FastFourier Transform) techniques, yielding the so-called orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM);
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 4/ 49 ⇒|
Multicarrier Modulations - ApplicationExamples
❐ Digital audio and video broadcasting in Europe;
❐ Wireless local area networks (WLAN) - IEEE802.11a, g;
❐ Fixed wireless broadband services;
❐ Mobile wireless broadband communications;
❐ Multiband OFDM for ultrawideband (UWB) communications;
❐ A candidate for the next-generation cellular mobilecommunications systems.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 5/ 49 ⇒|
Multicarrier Modulations - Transmitter
×SymbolMapper
R/N bps s0
g(t)
cos(2πf0t)
s0(t)
×
+Serial-to-ParallelConverter
R bps
..........
SymbolMapper
R/N bpsg(t)
×SymbolMapper
R/N bpsg(t)
s1 s1(t)
cos(2πf1t)
sN−1 sN−1(t)
cos(2πfN−1t)
s(t)
Figure 1: Transmitter schematic diagram in general multicarrier modulations.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 6/ 49 ⇒|
Multicarrier Modulations - Principles
❐ Consider a linearly modulated system with data rate R and bandwidth B;
❐ The coherence bandwidth of the channel is assumed to be Bc < B, sosignals transmitted over this channel experience frequency-selective fading.
When employing the MC modulations:
● the bandwidth B is broken into N subbands, each of which has a bandwidthBN = B/N for conveying a data rate RN = B/N ;
● Usually, it is designed to make BN << Bc, so that the subchannelsexperience (frequency non-selective) flat fading.
● In the time-domain, the symbol duration TN ≈ 1/BN of the modulated signalsis much larger than the delay-spread Tm ≈ 1/Bc of the channel, which henceyields small ISI.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 7/ 49 ⇒|
An example
Consider a MC system with a total passband bandwidth of 1 MHz.Suppose the channel delay-spread is Tm = 20 µs. How manysubchannels are needed to obtain approximately flat fading in eachsubchannel?
● The channel coherence bandwidth isBc = 1/Tm = 1/0.00002 = 50 KHz;
● To ensure flat fading on each subchannel, we takeBN = B/N = 0.1 × Bc << Bc;
● Hence, N = B/(0.1 × Bc) = 1000000/5000 = 200 subcarriers.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 8/ 49 ⇒|
Multicarrier Modulations - TransmittedSignals
s(t) =N−1∑
i=0
sig(t) cos (2πfit + φi) (1)
where
✔ si: complex data symbol (QAM, PSK, etc.) transmitted on the ithsubcarrier;
✔ φi: phase offset of the ith subcarrier;
✔ fi = f0 + i(BN): central frequency of the ith subcarrier;
✔ g(t): waveform-shaping pulse, such as raised cosine pulse.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 9/ 49 ⇒|
0 T
Amplitude
Time
Figure 2: Illustration of multicarrier modulated signals.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 10/ 49 ⇒|
Multicarrier Modulations - Receiver
to-SerialConverter
Parallel-
f0
s0(t) + n0(t)Demodulator
cos(2πf0t)
R/N bps
..........
DemodulatorR/N bps
DemodulatorR/N bps
f1
fN−1
s1(t) + n1(t)
cos(2πf1t)
cos(2πfN−1t)
sN−1(t) + nN−1(t)
R bps
s(t) + n(t)
Figure 3: Receiver schematic diagram in general multicarrier modulations.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 11/ 49 ⇒|
Overlapping MC
f4 f5 f6 f7f3f2f1f0
The set of orthogonal subcarrier frequencies, f0, f1, . . . , fN−1 satisfy:
1
TN
∫ TN
0
cos(2πfit + φi) cos(2πfjt + φj)dt =
0.5, if i = j
0, else(2)
The total system bandwidth required is:
B ≈ N/TN (3)
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 12/ 49 ⇒|
Overlapping MC - Detection❐ Without considering the fading and noise, the received MC signal can be
expressed as
r(t) =
N−1∑
i=0
sig(t) cos (2πfit + φi) (4)
❐ Assuming that the detector knows {φi}, then, sj can be detected as
sj =
∫ TN
0
r(t)g(t) cos (2πfjt + φj) dt
=
∫ TN
0
(N−1∑
i=0
sig(t) cos (2πfit + φi))g(t) cos (2πfjt + φj) dt
=
N−1∑
i=0
si
∫ TN
0
g2(t) cos (2πfit + φi) cos (2πfjt + φj) dt
=N−1∑
i=0
siδ(i − j) = sj , j = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1 (5)
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 13/ 49 ⇒|
Fading Mitigation Techniques in MCModulation
❐ Coding with interleaving over time and frequency to exploit thefrequency diversity provided by the subchannels experiencingdifferent fading;
❐ Frequency-domain equalization: When the received SNR isα2iPi, the receiver processes it as α2
iPi/α2i ≈ Pi to reduce the
fading;
❐ Precoding: If the transmitter knows that the channel fading gainis αi, it transmits the signals using power Pi/α
2i , so that the
received power is Pi;
❐ Adaptive loading: Mitigating the channel fading by adaptivelyvarying the data rate and power assigned to each subchannelaccording to its fading gain.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 14/ 49 ⇒|
Implementation of MC Modulation UsingDFT/IDFT
❐ Let x[n], 0 ≤ n ≤ N − 1, denote a discrete time sequence. TheN -point discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of {x[n]} is defined as
X[i] =DFT{x[n]}
,1√N
N−1∑
n=0
x[n] exp
(
−j2πni
N
)
, 0 ≤ i ≤ N − 1 (6)
❐ Correspondingly, given {X[i]}, the sequence {x[n]} can berecovered by the inverse DFT (IDFT) defined as
x[n] =IDFT{X[i]}
,1√N
N−1∑
i=0
X[i] exp
(j2πni
N
)
, 0 ≤ n ≤ N − 1 (7)
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 15/ 49 ⇒|
Implementation of MC Modulation UsingDFT/IDFT
❐ When an input data stream {x[n]} is sent through a linear time-invariantdiscrete-time channel having the channel impulse response (CIR) {h[n]}, theoutput {y[n]} is given by the discrete-time convolution of the input and theCIR, expressed as
y[n] = h[n] ∗ x[n] = x[n] ∗ h[n] =∑
k
h(k)x[n − k] (8)
❐ Circular Convolution: when {x[n]} is a N -length periodic sequence, then theN -point circular convolution of {x[n]} and {h[n]} is defined as
y[n] = h[n] ~ x[n] = x[n] ~ h[n] =∑
k
h(k)x[n − k]N (9)
❐ which has the property
DFT{y[n] = h[n] ~ x[n]} = X[i]H[i], i = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1 (10)
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 16/ 49 ⇒|
Implementation of MC Modulation: CyclicPrefix
Cyclic Prefix Original Length N Sequence
Append Last µ Symbols to Beginning
x[N − µ], x[N − µ + 1], ..., x[N − 1] x[0], x[1], ..., x[N − µ − 1] x[N − µ], x[N − µ + 1], ..., x[N − 1]
Figure 4: Cyclic prefix of length µ.
❐ The original N -length data block is x[n] : x[0], . . . , x[N − 1];
❐ The µ-length cyclic prefix block is x[N − µ], . . . , x[N − 1], whichis constituted by the last µ symbols of the data block {x[n]};
❐ The actually transmitted data block is length N + µ, which is
x[n] : x[N − µ], . . . , x[N − 1], x[0], x[1], . . . , x[N − 1]
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 17/ 49 ⇒|
Implementation of MC Modulation: CyclicPrefix
❐ Then, when {x[n]} is input to a discrete-time channel having the CIRh[n] : h[0], . . . , h[µ], the channel outputs are
y[n] =x[n] ∗ h[n] =
µ∑
k=0
h[k]x[n − k] =
µ∑
k=0
h[k]x[n − k]N
=x[n] ~ h[n], n = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1 (11)
❐ Therefore,
Y [i] = DFT{y[n] = x[n] ~ h[n]} = X[i]H[i], i = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1 (12)
❐ When {Y [i]} and {H[i]} are given, the transmitted sequence can berecovered as
x[n] = IDFT
{
X[i] =Y [i]
H[i]
}
= IDFT
{DFT{y[n]}DFT{h[n]}
}
, n = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1 (13)
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 18/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM Using Cyclic Prefixing - An Example
❐ Consider an OFDM system with total bandwidth B = 1 MHz andusing N = 128 subcarriers, 16QAM modulation, and length µ = 8
of cyclic prefix.
Then
● The subchannel bandwidth is BN = B/128 = 7.812 kHz;
● The symbol duration on each subchannel isTN = 1/BN = 128 µs;
● The total transmission time of each OFDM block isT = TN + 8/B = 136 µs;
● The overhead due to the cyclic prefix is 8/128 = 6.25%;
● The total data rate is128 × log2 16 × 1/(T = 136 × 10−6) = 3.76 Mbps.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 19/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - System Structure
CP removing
P/S
S/P
IDFT
DFT
Transmitter
processing
processing
Receiver
Signal shaping
Matched-filtering
Channel
CP
XXX
N
xxx
N
yyy
NN
g(t)
g∗(−t)
YYY
Figure 5: Schematic block diagram of the transmitter/receiver for OFDM sys-tems using IDFT/DFT assisted multicarrier modulation/demodulation and cyclic-prefixing (CP).
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 20/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Transmitter
Serial-to-ParallelConverter
X[N − 1]
Add CyclicPrefix, andParallel-to-SerialConverter
x[0]X[0]
X[1] x[1]
x[N − 1]
×QAM
Modulation
XR bps
D/A s(t)
cos(2πf0t)
x(t)IFFT
Figure 6: Transmitter of OFDM with IFFT/FFT implementation.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 21/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Receiver
R bps Prefix, and
Converter
Converter
cos(2πf0t)
× r(t)LPFand A/D
y[n]
Remove
Serial-to-Parallel
y[0]
y[1]
y[N − 1]
FFT
Y [1]
Y [N − 1]
Y [0]
Parallel-to-Serial
YQAMDemod
Figure 7: Receiver of OFDM with IFFT/FFT implementation.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 22/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Transmitted Signal
● Let the N data symbols (thought as in the frequency-domain) tobe transmitted on the N subcarriers within a DFT period is givenby
XXX = [X0, X1, . . . , XN−1]T (14)
● After the IDFT on XXX, it generates N time-domain coefficientsexpressed as
xn =1√N
N−1∑
m=0
Xm exp
(
j2πmn
N
)
, n = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1 (15)
● Let FFF be a fast Fourier transform (FFT) matrix given by the nextslide. Then, we can express xxx = [x0, x1, . . . , xN−1]
T as
xxx = FFFHXXX (16)
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 23/ 49 ⇒|
FFT/IFFT Matrices
● FFT matrix:
FFF =1√N
1 1 1 · · · 1
1 WN W 2N · · · WN−1
N...
......
. . ....
1 WN−1N W
2(N−1)N · · · W
(N−1)2
N
(17)
where WN = e−j2π/N ;
● IFFT matrix is given by FFFH ;
● Main Properties: FFFHFFF = FFFFFFH = IIIN .
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 24/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Transmitted Signal
● After adding the cyclic-prefix (CP) of length µ, xxx is modified to xxx
of length N + µ;
● The normalized transmitted base-band OFDM signal is formedas
s(t) =
N+µ−1∑
n=0
xng (t − nTψ) (18)
where
✔ g (t): time-domain pulse defined in [0, Tψ), which isnormalized to satisfy
∫ Tψ0
g2 (t) dt = Tψ;
✔ Tψ: chip-duration and Tψ ≈ 1/B.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 25/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Representation of Received Signals
❐ When the OFDM signal of (18) is transmitted over afrequency-selective fading channel with the CIR hn, 0 ≤ n ≤ µ
as well as Gaussian noise, the discrete-time receivedobservation samples in correspondence to x0, x1, . . . , xN−1 aregiven by
yn = xn ∗ hn + vn, n = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1 (19)
❐ Let yyy = [y0, y1, · · · , yN−1]T . Then, it can be shown that yyy can be
expressed as
yyy = HHHxxx + vvv (20)
❐ Here, it is very important to represent the matrix HHH.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 26/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Representation of ReceivedSignals (Linear Convalution)
x−µ · · · x−1 x0 x1 x2 x3 x4 · · ·× · · · × × × × × × · · ·
∑hµ · · · h1 h0 0 · · ·
∑0 hµ · · · h1 h0 0 · · ·
∑0 0 hµ · · · h1 h0 0 · · ·
∑0 0 0 hµ · · · h1 h0 0 · · ·
∑0 0 0 0 hµ · · · h1 h0 0 · · ·
+ + + + + · · ·v0 v1 v2 v3 v4 · · ·= = = = = · · ·y0 y1 y2 y3 y4 · · ·
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 27/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Representation of ReceivedSignals (Another Way)
x−µ · · · x−1 x0 x1 x2 x3 x4 · · ·
h0 h0x0 h0x1 h0x2 h0x3 h0x4 · · ·h1 h1x−1 h1x0 h1x1 h1x2 h1x3 · · ·...
......
......
.... . .
hµ hµx−µ hµx−µ+1 hµx−µ+2 hµx−µ+3 hµx−µ+4 · · ·∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑
· · ·+v0 +v1 +v2 +v3 +v4 · · ·= = = = = · · ·y0 y1 y2 y3 y4 · · ·
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 28/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Representation of Received Signals
From the previous slide, we can see that
y0
y1
...
yn
...
yN−1
=
hµx−µ + hµ−1x−µ+1 + · · · + h0x0 + v0
hµx−µ+1 + hµ−1x−µ+2 + · · · + h1x0 + h0x1 + v1
...
hµxn−µ + hµ−1xn−µ+1 + · · · + h1xn−1 + h0xn + vn
...
hµxN−µ−1 + hµ−1xN−µ + · · · + h1xN−2 + h0xN−1 + vN−1
(21)
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 29/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Representation of Received SignalsWhen expressed in matrix form, (21) is
y0
y1
...
yN−1
︸ ︷︷ ︸
yyy
=
hµ hµ−1 · · · h0 0 · · · 0 0 · · · 0
0 hµ hµ−1 · · · h0 · · · 0 0 · · · 0...
......
. . ....
. . ....
.... . .
...
0 0 0 · · · 0 · · · hµ hµ−1 · · · h0
︸ ︷︷ ︸
HHH
x−µ
...
x−1
x0
...
xN−1
︸ ︷︷ ︸
xxx
+
v0
v1
...
vN−1
︸ ︷︷ ︸
vvv
(22)
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 30/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Representation of Received Signals
Therefore, we have
HHH =
hµ hµ−1 · · · h0 0 · · · 0 0 · · · 0
0 hµ hµ−1 · · · h0 · · · 0 0 · · · 0...
......
. . ....
. . ....
.... . .
...
0 0 0 · · · 0 · · · hµ hµ−1 · · · h0
(23)
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 31/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Representation of Received Signals● In (22), if CP is used and set as x−i = xN−i, i = 1, . . . , µ, then, (22) can be
represented as
y0
y1
...
yN−1
︸ ︷︷ ︸
yyy
=
h0 0 · · · 0 · · · 0 · · · h2 h1
h1 h0 · · · 0 · · · 0. . .
......
......
. . ....
. . . 0 · · · 0 hµ
hµ hµ−1 · · · h0 · · · 0 0 · · · 0...
.... . .
.... . .
......
. . ....
0 0 · · · 0 · · · h0 0 · · · 0...
.... . .
.... . .
.... . .
......
0 0 · · · 0 · · · hµ−1 · · · h0 0
0 0 · · · 0 · · · hµ · · · h1 h0
︸ ︷︷ ︸
HHH
x0
x1
...
xN−1
︸ ︷︷ ︸
xxx
+
v0
v1
...
vN−1
︸ ︷︷ ︸
vvv
(24)UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 32/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Representation of Received Signals
HHH =
h0 0 · · · 0 · · · 0 · · · h2 h1
h1 h0 · · · 0 · · · 0. . .
......
......
. . ....
. . . 0 · · · 0 hµ
hµ hµ−1 · · · h0 · · · 0 0 · · · 0...
.... . .
.... . .
......
. . ....
0 0 · · · 0 · · · h0 0 · · · 0...
.... . .
.... . .
.... . .
......
0 0 · · · 0 · · · hµ−1 · · · h0 0
0 0 · · · 0 · · · hµ · · · h1 h0
(25)
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 33/ 49 ⇒|
An Example
❐ Let we assume xxx = [x0, x1, x2, x3]T and µ = 2.
❐ Then, we have
HHH =
h2 h1 h0 0 0 0
0 h2 h1 h0 0 0
0 0 h2 h1 h0 0
0 0 0 h2 h1 h0
, HHH =
h0 0 h2 h1
h1 h0 0 h2
h2 h1 h0 0
0 h2 h1 h0
(26)
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 34/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Signal Detection❐ In (24), HHH is a circulant channel matrix, which can be decomposed into
HHH = FFFHΛΛΛFFF , where ΛΛΛ = diag{λ0, λ1, · · · , λN−1} is a (N ×N) diagonal matrix.
❐ Using xxx = FFFHXXX of (16), we can re-write (24) as
yyy = HHHFFFXXX + vvv = FFFHΛΛΛFFFFFFH︸ ︷︷ ︸
=IIIN
XXX + vvv = FFFHΛΛΛXXX + vvv (27)
❐ Carrying out the FFT on yyy gives
YYY = FFFyyy = FFFFFFH︸ ︷︷ ︸
=IIIN
ΛΛΛXXX +FFFvvv = ΛΛΛXXX + vvv′ (28)
❐ Therefore, for n = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1,
Yn = λnXn + v′n (29)
based on which {Xn} can be detected.
❐ Explicitly, there is no ISI.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 35/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Peak-to-Average Power Ratio
❐ The peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) is an importantattribute of a communication system;
❐ A low PAPR allows the transmit power amplifier to operateefficiently, whereas a high PAPR forces the transmit poweramplifier to have a large backoff in order to ensure linearamplification of the signal;
❐ A high PAPR requires high resolution for the receiver A/Dconverter, since the dynamic range of the signal is much largerfor high-PAPR signals.
❐ High-resolution A/D conversion places a complexity and powerburden on the receiver front end.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 36/ 49 ⇒|
0 T
Amplitude
Time
Figure 8: Illustration of multicarrier modulated signals.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 37/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Peak-to-Average Power Ratio
❐ The PAPR of a continuous-time signal is given by
PAPR ,maxt{|x(t)|2}
Et [|x(t)|2](30)
❐ The PAPR of a discrete-time signal is given by
PAPR ,maxn{|x[n]|2}
En [|x[n]|2](31)
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 38/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Peak-to-Average Power Ratio❐ In OFDM, the transmitted signal is given by
x[n] =1√N
N−1∑
i=0
X[i] exp
(j2πni
N
)
, 0 ≤ n ≤ N − 1 (32)
❐ Given E[|X[i]|2
]= 1, the average power of x[n] is given by
En
[|x[n]|2
]=
1
N
N−1∑
i=0
E[|X[i]|2
]= 1 (33)
❐ The maximum value occurs when all X[i]’s add coherently, yields
maxn
{|x[n]|2} = max
∣∣∣∣∣
1√N
N−1∑
i=0
X[i]
∣∣∣∣∣
2
=
∣∣∣∣
N√N
∣∣∣∣
2
= N (34)
❐ Therefore, in OFDM systems using N subcarriers, PAPR = N , whichlinearly increases with the number of subcarriers.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 39/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Techniques for PAPR Mitigation
❐ Clipping: clip the parts of the signals that are outside theallowed region;
❐ Coding: PAPR reduction can be achieved using coding at thetransmitter to reduce the occurrence probability of the samephase of the N signals;
❐ Peak cancellation with a complementary signal;
❐ · · ·
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 40/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Frequency and Time Offset
f4 f5 f6 f7f3f2f1f0
Figure 9: Spectrum of the OFDM signal, where the subcarrier signals are orthog-onal to each other.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 41/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Frequency and Time Offset
❐ OFDM modulation encodes the data symbol {Xi} ontoorthogonal subcarriers, where orthogonality is assumed by thesubcarrier separation ∆f = 1/TN ;
❐ In practice, the frequency separation of subcarriers is imperfectand so ∆f is not exactly equal to 1/TN ;
❐ This is generally caused by mismatched oscillators, Dopplerfrequency shifts, or timing synchronization, etc.;
❐ Consequently, frequency offset generates inter-carrierinterference (ICI).
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 42/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Frequency and Time Offset
❐ Let us assume that the signal transmitted on subcarrier i is
xi(t) = ej2πit/TN (35)
where the data symbol and the main carrier frequency are suppressed;
❐ An ideal signal transmitted on subcarrier (i + m) would by xi+m(t). However,due to the frequency offset of δ/TN , this signal becomes
xi+m(t) = ej2π(i+m+δ)t/TN (36)
❐ Then, the interference imposed by subcarrier (i + m) on subcarrier i is
Im =
∫ TN
0
xi(t)x∗i+m(t)dt =
TN
(1 − e−j2π(δ+m)
)
j2π(δ + m)(37)
❐ Explicitly, when δ = 0, Im = 0.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 43/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Frequency and Time Offset
❐ It can be shown that the total ICI power on subcarrier i is givenby
ICIi =∑
m6=i
|Im|2 ≈ C0(TNδ)2 (38)
where C0 is a certain constant.
❐ Observations
✔ As TN increases, the subcarriers become narrower andhence more closely spaced, which then results in more ICI;
✔ As predicted, the ICI increases as the frequency offset δ
increases;
✔ The ICI is not directly related to N , but larger N results inlarger TN and, hence, more ICI.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 44/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Frequency and Time Offset
❐ The effects from timing offset are generally less than those fromthe frequency offset, as long as a full N -sample OFDM symbolis used at the receiver without interference from the previous orsubsequent OFDM symbols;
❐ It can be shown that the ICI power on subcarrier i due to areceiver timing offset τ can be approximated as 2(τ/TN)2;
❐ Since usually τ << TN , the effect from timing offset is typicallynegligible.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 45/ 49 ⇒|
IEEE802.11 Wireless LAN Standard
❐ IEEE802.11a: Bandwidth= 300 MHz, operated in the 5 GHzunlicensed band;
❐ IEEE802.11g: Virtually identical to the IEEE802.11a, butoperated in the 2.4 GHz unlicensed band.
❐ Main Parameters:
✓ 300 MHz bandwidth is divided into 20 MHz channels that canbe assigned to different users;
✓ N = 64, µ = 16 samples;
✓ Convolutional code with one of three possible rates:r = 1/2, 2/3 or 3/4;
✓ Adaptive modulation based on the modulation schemes:BPSK, QPSK, 16-QAM and 64-QAM.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 46/ 49 ⇒|
OFDM - Summary● No interference exists among the transmitted symbols;
● It is a transmission scheme achieving the highest spectral-efficiency;
● No diversity gain is achievable in frequency-selective fading channels;
● Sensitive to the frequency offset and timing jitter;
● The transmitted OFDM signals have a high dynamic range, resulting in thehigh PAPR;
● The high PAPR requires that the OFDM transmitter has a high linear rangefor signal amplification. Otherwise, the OFDM signals conflict non-lineardistortion, which results in out-of-band emissions and co-channelinterference, causing significant degradation of the system’s performance;
● The high PAPR has more harmful effect on the uplink communications thanon the downlink communications, due to the power limit of mobile terminals;
● When OFDM is used for uplink communications, the high PAPR maygenerate severe inter-cell interference in cellular communications.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 47/ 49 ⇒|
Single-Carrier Frequency-DivisionMultiple-Access
❐ In order to take the advantages of multicarrier communicationswhereas circumventing simultaneously the high PAPR problem,the single-carrier frequency-division multiple-access (SC-FDMA)scheme has been proposed for supporting high-speed uplinkcommunications;
❐ In principle, the SC-FDMA can be viewed as a DFT-spreadmulticarrier CDMA scheme, where time-domain data symbolsare transformed to frequency-domain by a DFT before carryingout the multicarrier modulation;
❐ SC-FDMA is also capable of achieving certain diversity gain,when communicating over frequency-selective fading channels.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 48/ 49 ⇒|
SC-FDMA - Transmitter
mappingSubcarrier
(FFT)DFT IDFT
(IFFT)AddCP
Low-passfilter
{xk0, . . . , xk(N−1)}
s(t){Xk0, . . . , Xk(U−1)} {xk0, . . . , xk(U−1)}
T-domain F-domain T-domain
{Xk0, . . . , Xk(N−1)}
Figure 10: Transmitter schematic for the kth user supported by the SC-FDMAuplink.
UNIVERSITY OF
Southampton School of ECS, Univ. of Southampton, UK. http://www-mobile.ecs.soton.ac.uk 49/ 49 ⇒|
SC-FDMA - Receiver
Subcarrier F-domainprocessingdemapping CP filter
T-domain
Matched-RemoveDFT(FFT)
{Y0, . . . , Y(U−1)} {y0, . . . , y(U−1)}{Yk0, . . . , Yk(N−1)}
T-domain
IDFT(IFFT)
{xk0, . . . , xk(N−1)}
F-domainr(t)
Figure 11: Receiver schematic for the kth user supported by the SC-FDMA uplink.