May 2017 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR INTEGRATED SOLID ... · detailed project report for integrated solid waste management for hirekerur town solid waste management total estimated

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE

MANAGEMENT FOR HIREKERUR TOWN

SOLID

WASTE

MANAGEMENT

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST IS 283 LAKHS

May 2017

SUBMITTED TO: HIREKERUR

TOWN PANCHAYATH,

HIREKERUR,

HAVERI DISTRICT,

KARNATAKA

PREPARED BY:

SMS ENVOCARE LIMITED,

#301, 3RD FLOOR,

SHRESHTA BHOOMI,

KR ROAD,

BANGALORE- 560004

Internal document Control

Client Hirekerur Town Panchayath Hirekerur Haveri District

Client Representatives Chief Officer

Project Preparation of Detailed Project Report for Integrated Solid Waste Management at Hirekerur Town, Karnataka State Under Swachh Bharat Mission.

Work Order No. and Date SBM/SWM/CR/01/2015-16 Dated 11.01.2016 Contract Duration 03 Months

Document Title Draft Detailed Project Report on Integrated Solid Waste Management for Hirekerur Town – Draft Report (Version 01 dated 28.03.2016)

Document Title Detailed Project Report on Integrated Solid Waste Management for Hirekerur Town - Report (Version 02 dated 17.05.2016)

Document Title Detailed Project Report on Integrated Solid Waste Management for Hirekerur Town – Report (Version 03 dated 19.07.2016)




Junior Engineer/ Chief Officer

Environmental Engineer Hirekerur TP

Hirekerur TP

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter No.

Particulars Page No.

1.0 Executive Summary 1 2.0 PART A - GENERAL 3 2.1 History 3 2.2 Solid Waste Management –a Definition 3 2.3 Problems Due to Solid Waste 3 2.4 Current Status of SWM in India 4 2.5 Initiatives to Improve SWM in India 4 2.6 Project Background & Objectives 7

2.6.1 Objectives 7 2.7 Scope of Study 8 2.8 Solid Waste Mangement System 8 2.9 Financial Assistance 11

2.10 Consultant Appointment 11 2.11 Project Background 11 2.12 Salient Features of the City 13 2.13 Geology and Soils 15 2.14 Weather and Climate Condition 16

2.14.1 Temperature 16 2.14.2 Humidity 16 2.14.3 Climate Data 16 2.14.4 Rainfall 16 2.15 Population of Hirekerur (Past, Present & Projected) 17

2.15.1 Ward wise Population and Quantity of Waste (2011) 17 2.16 Work done in the City 18

2.16.1 Source of Waste Generation 19 2.16.2 Present Quantities and Projections 19 2.17 Site Details 21

2.18 Existing Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Management System: Hirekerur

22

2.18.1 Segregation at Source 22 2.18.2 Primary & Secondary Collection System 22 2.18.3 Street Sweeping 22 2.18.4 Process & Disposal 22 2.18.5 Bio Medical Waste 23 2.18.6 C & D Waste 23 2.18.7 Mutton and Chicken Waste 23 2.18.8 Bulk Waste 23 2.19 Existing Assets and its Condition 23 2.20 Present Organization Structure for MSWM 23

2.20.1 Observations 24

2.21 Total Expenditure Incurred Towards ISWM and Total Revenue Being Collected etc.

24

2.22 Proposed Collection and Transportation of MSW 25

Chapter No.


2.23 Proposed Assets for Collection & Transportation and of MSW

29

2.24 Micro Level Planning for Primary Collection 30 3.0 PART B: Technology 34 3.1 Technology Option 34 3.2 Overall Proposal for the Project 39 3.3 Implementation of 3R’s concept 40 4.0 PART C: Common Facility Development 42 4.1 Introduction 42 4.2 Observations 42 4.3 Overall Layout of the Site 42 4.4 Common Facility Design 43

4.4.1 Road 43 4.4.2 Weigh bridge 43

4.4.3 Boundary Green Fence & Green Layout within the facility

43

4.4.4 Monitoring Wells 44 4.4.5 Storage cum Recycling Shed 44 4.4.6 Plant & Yard Lighting 44 4.4.7 Power Connection 44 4.4.8 35 KVA DG Back Up 44 4.4.9 PPEs, Fire Safety, Tools & tackles 44

4.4.10 Deck Slab 44 4.4.11 Dry Waste Collection Centre 45 4.4.12 Vermi Composting FAcility 45 4.4.13 Shelter for Reception cum Monsoon Area 45 4.4.14 Processing Pad 45 4.4.15 Ramp 45 4.4.16 Nala 45 4.4.17 Pipeline to Aerobic Pad 45

5.0 PART D: Composting Facility 46 5.1 Design Choices 46 5.2 Spraying of Waste with EM Solution 46 5.3 Design Basis 46

5.3.1 Sizing of Plant 46 5.4 The Process Flow 46 5.5 Process Flow Chart 48 5.6 Facility Design 50

5.6.1 Project Layout 50 5.6.2 Civil Work Design 51

5.6.2.1 Aerobic Compost Yard 51 5.6.2.2 Processing Shed 52 5.6.2.3 Reception cum Monsoon Shed 52 5.6.2.4 Drains along the roads 52 5.6.2.5 Equipment 53

6.0 PART E: Landfill 54

Chapter No.


6.1 Approach to Landfill Design 54 6.2 Land Profile 54 6.3 Volume of Waste to be land filled 54 6.4 Landfill Layout 55

6.4.1 Volume of the Landfill, landfill capacity and life 55 6.4.2 Liner 55 6.4.3 Landfill Phasing 56 6.4.4 Leachate treatment (Solar Evaporation) 56 6.4.5 Storm Water Management 58

7.0 Public Awareness through IEC and capacity building of Urban Local Bodies for Sustainable MSW Management

59

7.1 Introduction 59

7.2 Identification and Orientation of Resident’s welfare Committees

60

7.3 Identification and Mobilization of NGOs or Social Welfare groups NGO Involvement

61

7.4 Public Participation and Awareness Through Information, Education and Communication Plan

62

7.5 Approach of IEC Plan 62 7.6 Strategy for Creating Awareness 63 8.0 PART F: Cost Estimate 64 8.1 Civil Cost Estimates 64 8.2 Financial Model 64 8.3 Material Balance 65 8.4 Revenue 65

8.5 Operation and Maintenance cost for Collection and Transportation

66

8.6 Equipments Cost for Collection and Transportation 66 8.7 Equipment Cost for Processing Facility 67

8.8 Manpower Requirement for Collection and Transportation & Processing and Disposal

67

8.9 Operation and maintenance for Processing and Disposal

68

8.10 Sustainable Operation of the Plant 68

8.11 Operation and maintenance Cost for C & T and Processing & Disposal

69

9.0 BOQ 70 10.0 Drawings 70

List of Tables

Sl. No. Description Page No.

1 Salient Features of Hirekerur City 13

2 GPS Reading of the Proposed Site 14

3 Climate Data 17

4 Population growth of the City 17

5 Growth in Population Density 17

6 Ward wise Population and Waste Generation (2011) 18

7 Source wise generation of waste 19

8 Waste Quantification 20

9 Waste Generation and Classification (in tons per day) 20

10 Waste Classification Study 21

11 Existing Assets Details 23

12 Existing Staff Details 23

13 Existing Expenditure Details 24

14 Existing Revenue Details 24

15 Road classification 26

16 Staff Deployment for Collection and Transportation 27

17 Existing and Proposed Assets for Collection and

Transportation 28

18 List of Equipment, Machineries and vehicles Required 29

19 Micro Level Planning for Primary Collection from

Households 31

20

Micro Level Planning for Primary Collection from

Commercial Waste, Market Waste, Street Sweeping

etc.,

33

21 Details of Civil structures (Existing and Proposed) 42

22 Details of Equipment in Processing Line 53

23 Projected Waste Handing Over Design Life for

Landfill 54

24 Leachate calculation 57

25 Details of Civil Cost 64

26 Details of Financial Model 64

27 Details of Financial Model (Special SBM Grant) 65

28 Material Balance Details 65

29 Details of revenue Cost 66

30 Total O & M Cost for Collection and Transportation 66

31 Manpower Proposed for Collection & Transportation 66

32 Equipment Cost for Collection & Transportation 66

33 Equipment Cost for Processing Facility 67

34 Manpower Requirement 67

35 Operation and Maintenance Cost Details 68

36 Consolidated operation and Maintenance Cost Details 69

37 Proposed User Charges Details 69

38 Revenue Proposed: FY 16-17 70

39 Revenue Proposed (By Sale of Compost, Recyclables &

User Charges) 70

40 Projection of o & M Cost, Revenue by Compost 7 by-

Products and revenue by User Charges for 5 Years 70

List of Annexure

Annexure 1 BOQs Annexure 2 Drawings Annexure 3 Routing Map for Micro Planning

Consultancy Services for Preparing DPR on MSWM for Hirekerur

Prepared for TP, Hirekerur Page 1

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As per the 2011 census Hirekerur Town has population of 19,191 and having 4,125

households.

Present (2016) approximate population and households having 20,170 and 4,342

respectively.

City is presently generating 7 Tons per day (TPD) MSW and has the collection

efficiency of 70% (4.9 TPD) from the all generators.

Designing of Processing facility is considered for next 15 years - 2016 as Base year,

2023 as intermediate year and 2031 as ultimate year.

Aerobic pad is designed for handling 8 TPD of waste. (Next Five Year Plan)

Technology proposed for processing of MSW is mechanical aerobic composting

(Mixed waste), baling unit (Plastic and cloths) and scientific landfill (inerts).

Electro-Mechanical Processing Equipment capacity of 8m3/hour is proposed (32 TPD) which is used for Processing of mixed waste as well as segregated waste.

Existing Vermi composting pits having processing capacity of 1 TPD of Organic

Waste received from Market waste.

Scientific landfill is designed for next 15 years for an area of 1,800 m2, in first phase

we have considered cost and design for development of 600 m2 for next 5 years

waste handling.

Total cost estimated for Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Processing Facility for

Hirekerur Town is Rs. 2.83 Cr.

SL NO ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT IN LAKHS

I Collection and Transportation 13.82

II Processing and Disposal

A Common Facility

1 Construction of internal Roads 21.73

2 Providing Pipeline from Borewell to Aerobic Pad 0.21

3 Construction of Drain and Kerb 7.65



4 Construction of Nala 0.72

5 Construction of Deck slab 3.50

6 Construction of Monitoring Well 6.88

7 Dry Waste Collection Centre 6.15

8 Construction of Ramp 3.46

9 Lump sum provision for Land Scape Green belt development

3.00

TOTAL A (Civil Works) 53.30

B Compost Facility

1 Electromechanical Equipments 67.73

2 Pad for Reception Area 4.60

3 Truss for Reception Area 8.70

4 Aerobic composting Pad (without Cover) 35.70

5 Storage cum Recycling Shed 3.50

6 Truss for Storage cum Recycling Shed 2.74

TOTAL B (Compost Facility) 122.97

C Landfill Facility

1 Land fill Area 31.96

2 Leachate Tank (Aeration ) 7.10

TOTAL C (Landfill Facility) 39.06

D List of Equipments and Miscellaneous etc.,

1 Back up DG 3.59

2 Street Lights 1.75

3 Power Connection from HESCOM 3.00

4 PPEs 0.76

5 Fire Safety Equipments 0.46

6 Tools & Tackles 0.84

7 Weigh Bridge 11.75

8 Back Hoe Loader 22.55

TOTAL D (Movable Equipments and Safety Equipments etc.,)

44.71

TOTAL E (Contingency @ 3%) 8.22

TOTAL F (Miscellaneous and round off) 0.93

GRAND TOTAL (I+A+B+C+D+E+F) 283.00



2. PART A - GENERAL

2.1 HISTORY

Waste disposal is one of the major problems being faced over the world and India is no

exception. Management of Solid Waste, though an essential service, is given low priority.

This, coupled with lack of financial resources, institutional weaknesses, improper choice

of technology & rapid urbanization, whose ramifications are more pronounced with

uncontrolled growth rate of population, has made this service far from satisfactory, thus

creating serious environmental and health problems.

2.2 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT (SWM)

Solid waste is the unwanted or useless solid materials generated from combined

residential, industrial and commercial activities in a given area. It may be

categorized according to its origin (domestic, industrial, commercial, construction

and demolition or institutional); according to its contents (organic material, glass,

metal, plastic paper etc); or according to hazard potential (toxic, non-toxin, flammable,

radioactive, infectious etc).

Management of solid waste reduces or eliminates adverse impacts on the

environment and human health and supports economic development and improved

quality of life. A number of processes are involved in effectively managing waste

for a municipality. These includes, monitoring, collection, transport, processing,

recycling and disposal.

It is an integrated process comprising several collection methods, varied transportation

equipment, storage, recovery mechanisms for recyclable material, reduction of waste

quantity by methods such as composting; refuse derived fuel (RDF), waste-to-energy,

and disposal in a designated engineered sanitary landfill. The selection of a suitable

SWM process is driven by the source and quality of waste produced.

2.3 PROBLEMS DUE TO SOLID WASTE

Accumulation of solid waste in open areas or on road sides is aesthetically unpleasing

and detrimental to natural beauty of the city. In the environment, chemicals and other

contaminants found in solid waste can seep into our groundwater and can also be

carried by rainwater to rivers and lakes that provide essential wildlife habitat.

These contaminates can also end up in our ground water, rivers and lakes that are our

sources for drinking water. It is also a source of breeding ground for insects, and other

vectors (rats and mice, wild and domesticated animals). It also causes odor nuisance,

reflects the unorganized nature of the community, and creates a poor environment for



growing children. Improper and unorganized disposal of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)

in open areas and landfills have a negative impact on the living conditions of human

beings as well as the overall environment.

Open dumps of municipal solid waste (MSW) are responsible for the number of vector

diseases and also release of greenhouse gases. However, using adequate information,

resources, and efficient management practices, one can turn solid waste into a useful

resource.

2.4 CURRENT STATUS OF SWM IN INDIA

Currently India is seriously struggling to design useful and economical solid waste

management systems. Increase in per capita solid waste generation rate is another

serious threat for the management authorities.

Management of Solid Wastes is of growing concern to the general public at large, and for

the local authorities and business communities in cities and towns across India. The

problem is exacerbating in urban areas due to rapid strides in population growth,

coupled with an economic boom that encourages the consumption of goods and, hence,

wastes generation. MSW primarily comprises of 51% of organic fraction, 17% of

recyclables (paper, glass and plastic), 32% of inert material, and less than one percent

glass and metal.

According to Census 2011, India’s urban population is 377 million or 31% of the total

population. These numbers are expected to increase to 600 million by 2031. The Census

2011 also showed that in 4,041 statutory towns, close to eight million households do

not have access to toilets and defecate in the open (7.90 million). Weak sanitation has

significant health costs and untreated sewage from cities is the single biggest source of

water resource pollution in India. This indicates both the scale of the challenge ahead of

the Indian cities and the huge costs that will be incurred from not addressing them.

The Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), viz. municipalities and municipal corporations, are

responsible for providing SWM services in the urban areas. In most of the urban areas,

due to improper planning, insufficient funds, use of obsolete/ inefficient technologies,

lack of public awareness/training, and improper infrastructure have resulted in a state

of poor SWM. And also due to diverse living practices in same town, management

authorities cannot provide uniform solid waste management system, which has resulted

in thriving of many unscientific solid waste management systems in the country.

2.5 INITIATIVES TO IMPROVE SWM IN INDIA

In recent years, the Government of India has taken several initiatives to improve

existing SWM practices in the country. Some of the key initiatives and recommendations

are discussed below:



HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECOMMENDATIONS In recent years, the current SWM system in India has received considerable attention

from the Central and State Governments and local municipalities. The first initiative was

taken by the Honorable Supreme Court of India in 1998, which resulted in the formation

of a Committee to study the current status of SWM in Indian cities.

This Committee identified the deficiencies/gaps in the

existing SWM system in the country and prepared the

“Interim Report on SWM Practices in Class I Cities”.

Class I are cities with a population ranging between one

lakh to ten lakhs (1,00,000 – 10,00,000).

MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT RULES As a second initiative, the Ministry of Environment

and Forests (MoEF), Government of India, published

“Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling)

Rules 2000” (MSW Rules 2000). These rules were

developed in conformance with Sections 3, 6 and 25

of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and aim at

standardization and enforcement of SWM practices

in the urban sector.

They dictate that, “Every municipal authority shall, within the territorial area of the

municipality, be responsible for the implementation of the provisions of these rules and

infrastructure development for collection, storage segregation, transportation, processing

and disposal of municipal solid wastes”. In addition, “the CPCB shall coordinate with State

Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) and Pollution Control Committees (PCCs) in the matters

of MSW disposal and its management and handling”.

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU NATIONAL URBAN RENEWAL MISSION The Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) is the third notable

initiative undertaken by Government of India. JNNURM provides funding for urban

infrastructure development in 63 cities and towns of the country. This mission was

initiated in 2006 and is slated to continue until 2011.

SWACHH BHARAT MISSION Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) was launched on 2nd of October, 2014 with a vision to

achieve a clean India as attribute to the father of the nation, Mahatma Gandhi, on his 150th

birth anniversary, in 2019. SBM is being implemented by the Ministry of Urban

Development (MoUD) and by the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation (MDWS) for

urban and rural areas with a given set of guidelines for improved sanitary services and

capacity building initiatives.



Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) a major component of the SBM (urban)-

“refers to a systematic process that comprises of waste segregation and storage at source,

primary collection, secondary storage, transportation, secondary segregation, resource

recovery, processing, treatment, and final disposal of solid waste.”Under the provisions of

SWM, the local bodies are to prepare Detailed Project Reports in consultation with the

state government based on the identified needs of the City Sanitation Plans. Provision also

mentions clustering of smaller cities for attracting Private investment. The DPRs should

be prepared in lines with Govt. of India’s goals outlined in the National Urban Sanitation

Policy (NUSP) 2008, SWM rules, advisories, CPHEEO manuals (including cost recovery

mechanisms), O&M practices and Service-level Benchmark advisories released by MoUD

and Manual on Municipal Solid Waste Management, 2000.Central government

Grant/Viability Gap Funding may also be used to promote projects of waste to energy.

Central government incentive for the SWM projects will be in the form of a maximum

of 20% Grant / Viability Gap Funding (VGF) for each project.

As per the rules made in 2016-17, No. 20/1/2016 – SBM- I, Government of India, Ministry

of Urban Development, Central assistance for Municipal Solid Waste Management

component has raised from 20 % to 35 % ant this will be subjected to overall state-wise

funds envelop, for the entire mission period, SWM remains unchanged.

FOURTEENTH FINANCE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS Constituted by the President of India, under Article 280 of the constitution, the Finance

Commission is to recommend on distribution of central tax revenues between the Union

and the States. Supporting Local bodies through grant, subsequent to the passage of the

73rd and 74th constitutional amendments was first time announced in the 10th Finance

Commission for providing basic services at the grassroots level and strengthening

decentralization.

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL RECOMMENDATIONS Action Plan for Management of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)

CPCB has framed and notified the “Action Plan for Management of Municipal Solid Waste

(MSW)” in compliance with the National Green Tribunal order dated 5th Febrauary-2015

in the matter of OA No. 199 of 2014. The Action Plan emphasizes on strengthening the

planning exercise at national, state as well as city level by improvising through the waste

management value chain. In addition to that, The Plan suggested the concept of regional



cluster approach as well as technology options on the basis of quantum of MSW

generation which has been re-produced below in nutshell.

The Regional Cluster approach is based on the concept of discouraging setting up of

individual waste processing and disposal facilities leading to mushrooming of

innumerable facilities which are difficult to monitor and sustain. The approach requires a

detailed survey of the study area and identification of location for regional facility with

adequate size of land free from public objections. An indicative distance of say up to 50

km for each local body may be feasible based on local condition, fixing of criteria by the

local body to transport the waste for common disposal point without causing public

nuisance and traffic hurdles. However, alternate options can be worked out for smaller

local bodies. Common facility should be ‘integrated’ with facilities for sorting, compost,

RDF and energy plant and followed by inert recycling/re-use. Only a fraction of inert

waste should go for land-filling. The Action Plan has outlined indicative plan based on the

quantum of waste generated in the cluster. The indicative plans have been given for

towns in four ranges of waste generation.

2.6 PROJECT BACKGROUND

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN HIREKERUR TOWN- OVERVIEW

There is a need to enhance the existing MSWM system for Hirekerur Town. Genereted

waste is being disposed of unscientifically leading to environmental pollution and serious

health problems. The urban local body are facing challenges in effectively managing the

Municipal solid waste. The solid waste generated from domestic and commercial

activities have become a mojor concern, as they have got potential to cause severe

environmental problems and are thretening human health and life.

2.6.1 OBJECTIVES

Broad objectives of the proposed project are outlined below:

To review of the present status of MSWM practices and to investigate core

issues related to the solid waste management in the town.

To Identify the deficiencies/gaps in the exisiting system and propose a

comprehensive plan for MSWM including;

Segregation, collection, transportation and regional approach for processing

& scientific disposal in Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management

Facility in compliance with the MSW Rules 2000.



In addition, analyze options for waste processing for effective and scientific

management of MSW generated.

Implementation of 3R’s Concept i.e; Reduce, Reuse & Recycle

ULB (Hirekerur TP) should bare 50% of Operation and Maintenance Cost

from Revenue generated by User Charges, Sale of Compost, By-products &

Recyclables.

2.7 SCOPE OF STUDY

Realistic assessment of quantity, Characterization and classification of MSW;

Survey of the prevailing conditions.

Situation/Gap Analysis of the existing condition with respect to MSW Rules, 2000.

Detailed planning for resource requirement & implementation strategy.

Design of MSW management system viz. Collection System (Primary/ Secondary),

Transportation & waste processing system and sanitary landfill in accordance with

MSW Rules 2000.

Preparation of conceptual and detailed drawings.

Preparation of Bill of Quantities (BOQs).

Capital and Operation & Maintenance (O&M) cost estimates.

MSW management model including privatization aspects.SCOPE

2.8 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – Functional Elements

Functional Elements of Solid Waste Management System

The activities associated with the management of solid wastes from the point of

generation to final disposal are divided into following functional elements:

Waste Generation

segregation at Source & Waste storage

Primary Collection

Secondary storage /Transportation /Processing

Disposal

a. Waste Generation

Waste generation encompasses activities in which materials are identified as no

longer being of value and are either thrown away or gathered together for disposal. It

is important to note that in waste generation, there is identification step and that this

step varies with each individual waste. Waste generation is, at present an activity that

is not very controllable. Source reduction, though not controllable, is now included in

system evaluation as a method of limiting the quantity of waste generated.

b. Segregation at Source & Waste storage

Waste handling and separation involves the activities associated with the

management of wastes until they are placed in storage containers for collection.

Handling also encompasses a movement of loaded containers to the point of



collection. Separation of waste components is an important step in the handling and

storage of solid waste at source. From standpoint of material specifications and

revenue from sale of recovered materials, the best place to separate the recovered

materials for reuse and recycling, is the source of generation. On-site storage is of

primary importance because of public health concerns and aesthetic considerations.

Open ground storage and unsightly makeshift containers, both of which are

undesirable, are often seen at many residential and commercial sites.

c. Primary Collection

The functional element of collection includes not only the gathering of wastes but

also the transport of these materials, after collection, to an intermediate location,

where the collection vehicle is emptied. This intermediate location can be materials

processing facility (waste storage depot/WSD) or a transfer station. In small cities,

where final disposal sites are nearby, the hauling of wastes is not a serious problem.

But in large cities, where the haul distance to the point of final disposal is often

greater, the haul may have significant economic implications. Where long distances

are involved, transfer and transport facility is normally used.

d. Secondary Storage /Transportation/ Processing

The recovery of segregated materials, separation & processing of solid waste

components and transformation of solid wastes that occur primarily in locations

away from source of waste generation are encompassed by this functional element.

Processing often includes separation of bulky items, separation of ferrous metals,

manual separation of waste components and volume reduction by compaction.

Transformation processes are used to reduce volume and weight of waste requiring

disposal and to recover conversion products. The most commonly used chemical

transformation process is combustion, which is used in conjunction with recovery of

energy in the form of heat. The most commonly used biological transformation

process is composting. The selection of given set of processes depends on the waste

management objectives to be achieved.

e. Disposal

Disposal is the final functional element in the solid waste management system. Today,

disposal of waste by landfilling is the ultimate fate of all solid wastes. A modern

sanitary landfill is not a dump, rather it is an integrated, engineered facility used for

disposing solid waste on land without creating nuisance or hazards to public health

and safety. In most cities, planning for waste disposal involves dealing with

municipality, development authority and other agencies. Thus, landuse planning

becomes a primary determinant in the site selection, design and operation of

processing facilities and landfills. Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) is required

for any new landfill site to ensure compliance with public health, aesthetics and

future use of land.



Chart 1: Integrated Solid Waste Management Process Flow Chart

WASTE GENERATION AT SOURCE

WASTE SEGREGATION AT SOURCE

(DRY WASTE/ WET WASTE)

DOOR TO DOOR COLLECTION

(PUSHCARTS, WHEELED BINS, AUTO

TIPPERS)

STORAGE OF WASTE (TRANSFER STATION,

OPEN COLLECTION POINTS)

SECONDARY COLLECTION AND

TRANSPORTATION (TRACTORS,

COMPACTORS, TIPPERS)

WASTE RECEIPT AT SWM SITE, WEIGHING AND

RECORDING (WEIGH BRIDGE)

RECEPTION AREA - MATERIAL

RECOVERY

SUBJECTING TO AEROBIC COMPOSTING PAD

(WINDROW PLATFORM)

VERMI-COMPOSTING

(ORGANIC WASTE)

TROMMELS 16MM & 4MM

BAGGING & SALE

DRY WASTE COLLECTION

CENTRE

RECYCLING

SANITARY

LANDFILL

REJECTS

REJECTS

RDF, BAILING

INERTS,

REJECTS

INERTS, STREET

SWEEPING

WASTE



2.9 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

It is in this view that the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, has

enacted Municipal Solid Waste (Management & Handling) Rules in the year 2000, under

the Environment Protection Act, 1986. As per these Rules, all the municipal solid waste

has to be managed scientifically and disposed off in an environmentally secured manner.

The State of Karnataka is undertaking many efforts in improving the solid waste

management systems in its cities. As part of its efforts the preliminary requirement is

preparation of Detailed Project Report to provide an overall direction for the activity and

implementation of efficient solid waste management practices in each city. This

document gives the detailed project report for efficient Processing and disposal systems

for Municipal solid waste in Hirekerur Town. Therefore local urban body seeks a financial

assistance from the State Government and Government of India in the following schemes.

Swachh Bharat Mission

SFC

14th Finance

SBM Special Fund

2.10 CONSULTANT APPOINTMENT

As part of this activity Hirekerur Town Panchayat initiated to prepare a Detailed Project

Report (DPR) for Solid Waste Management for the Town. TP appointed “SMS Envocare

Limited” as consultant for proposed integrated Solid Waste Management processing

facility.

This report would be design document for setting up the Municipal solid waste

processing facility for Hirekerur Town.

2.11 PROJECT BACKGROUND

Hirekerur is a Town Panchayat in Haveri District in the State of Karnataka. The Name

Hirekerur Means "Hire"=Big, "Keri"= Pound/Lake, "Ur"=Village, Pronounced as Hee Ray

Kay Roor. The Town Panchayat Hirekerur was established on 12-01-1996. The total

extent area of this town Panchayat is 5.00 SqKms and the population as per 2011 census

is 19,191. Hirekerur Town Panchayat consists of 16 wards. The Durga Devi Temple is the

famous temple in Hirekerur Town. Hirekerur is located at 14.47°N to 75.38°E. It has an

average elevation of 619 metres (2030 ft).

It is located 44 KM towards South from District headquarters Haveri and 338 Km from

State capital Bangalore towards South-East.



Hirekerur Taluk is bounded by Shikaripur Taluk towards South, Byadgi Taluk towards

North, Ranebennur Taluk towards East, Sorab Taluk towards west. Shikaripur City,

Ranibennur City, Sagar City, Davanagere City are the nearby Cities to Hirekerur.

Fig 1 below shows the road map of Hirekerur city.

Fig 1 : City Road Map



The Tunga-Bhadra River flowing on the eastern boarder of the district is the only

perennial river in the district. The Varada and Kumudvati rivers are major tributaries of

Tungabhadra and river Dharma a major tributary of Varada drains the district. All the

rivers in the district together with their tributaries exhibit dendretic drainage pattern and

they form part of Krishna main basin.

2.12 SALIENT FEATURES OF THE CITY

Table 1: Salient Features of Hirekerur City

Sl. No. Item Details

1 Population 19,191 as per 2011 census

2 Total House holds 4,125 as per 2011 census

3 Present Population 20,170 (Approx.)

4 Present Households 4,343 (Approx.)

5 Area 5 Sq. Km.

6 Wards 16

7 Total Length of Road 54 Kms

A-Type – 6 Km

B-Type – 8 Km

C-Type – 40 Km

8 Waste generating 7 Tons Per day

9 Shops and Commercial Establishment 213

10 Markets 2

11 Hospitals and Nursing Homes 15

12 Educational Institutions 51

13 Kalyan Mantap 6

14 Hotels and restaurants 46

The Figure 2 describes the topographical Map of the City.



Fig 2 : Topographical Map of the Site

The GPS reading of the proposed site is tabulated below in the Table 2.

Table 2: GPS Reading of the Proposed Site

Points Latitude Longitude

A 14°28'01.66"N 75°25'10.25"E

B 14°28'02.09"N 75°25'15.67"E

C 14°27'59.33"N 75°25'16.28"E

D 14°27'58.50"N 75°25'13.10"E

E 14°27'54.97"N 75°25'12.16"E

F 14°27'55.05"N 75°25'09.81"E

The Aerial Map of the Proposed Site is located in the Figure 3.



Fig 3: Aerial view of the Proposed Site

2.13 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

The district lies on the deccan plateau and comprises mainly Dharwad system as it bed

rocks Dharwad and Haveri. The Dharwad belt passes through the western part Haveri

district in a south east direction, with an average width of 17 kms to 20 kms. The major

portion of this cellist belt has no mineral deposits of any commercial importance,

excepting the eastern part of Haveri district.

The rocks show a considerable variation in texture, are usually massive and are pink to

grey in colour. Bands of conglomerates occur in the northern region of the district and

these pebbles and holders comprise granite felsites appetite, quartzite and schist’s. Rocks

belonging to the Kaladgi series which consists mostly of quartzite’s conglomerates,

breccias and sandstones are found to occur in the north-eastern sector of the district.

Laterite too is found to occur in several parts, but chiefly in the west as capping over

granite, gneiss and quartzite. The mineral wealth of the district includes gold copper iron

and manganese besides granite which is most useful as a construction material and is

extensively quarried in all parts of the district.

The study area possesses soils derived from a variety of potential materials, such as

schists, traps, sandstones, limestones, shales, granite and laterites. The mixed brown and

lateritic soil occurs mostly in the western high rainfall tract of Hanagal, Byadagi and

Hirekerur talukas of the district. They are medium deep, granular to vesicular in structure

HIREKERUR SWM SITE BASARIHALLI VILLAGE



bright red to mottled yellow and red. There are extensive areas covered with black soil in

the northern part and some central part of the district. This black soil is driveled from

various parent materials such as traps, schists, granites and limestone, usually contain

lime nodules, have high base states and rather shallow in the ridges. In some cases black

soil and red soil occur intermixed. In the southern talukas of Haveri, Ranebennur,

Byadagi, Hirekerur and Hanagal the soils are either red sandy loams or black soils. The

red sandy loams are derived from granites or schists with predominant content of coarse

particles and gravel and babbles, rather shallow in depth and have poor water holding

capacity.

2.14 WEATHER & CLIMATE CONDITIONS

2.14.1 Temperature

The annual summer temperature is around 25-350C and annual winter

temperature is around 16-220C. Generally the mean minimum (January) is 14–

180C and the mean maximum (May) is 32-370C. The maximum temperature

recorded is around 370C and the minimum temperature is around 160C.

2.14.2 Humidity

The relative humidity is generally 86% during monsoon months and 63%

during dry months. During the mornings the humidity is more and mean relative

than 67 per cent with the highest in the months of July and August (around 87

per cent) and the lowest humidity in the month of March. And during evenings

the humidity is more than 31 percent with the highest in the months of August

and October (around 69 per cent) and the lowest in the month of March.

Generally nearly 25 percent difference is observed from mornings to evenings

with the highest differences seen in the months of January, February and March

(> 35 per cent).

2.14.3 Climate data

The climate in the region is hot, moist, semi-arid Ecological Sub Region with

length of growing period of 150-180 days. The town experiences pleasant

weather almost all throughout the year. March, April and May are the

predominant summer months while December and January constitute winter.

The nearest IMD station giving the rainfall, humidity, temperature and wind is at

Bangalore. Hence, the data was used to understand the climate in the area.

2.14.4 Rainfall

IMD station recorded an average rainfall of around 636 mm over the years

2014-2015. It is observed from the IMD data provided that there are two peaks

in the rainfall namely August, September and October months. But the highest

rainfall months are mainly August, September and October.



Table 3: Climate Data

Month Mean - Temperature Rainfall

Monthly in mm Daily Max.°C Daily Min.°C

January 29 16 1

February 32 17 2.2

March 34 21 17.1

April 36 22 48.8

May 37 23 61.7

June 31 22 83

July 31 22 79.9

August 30 21 89.4

September 31 22 96.6

October 31 21 111.2

November 30 20 38

December 31 18 6.9

2.15 POPULATION OF HIREKERUR (PAST, PRESENT & PROJECTED)

The population density of the city is increasing over the past 2 decades. The city is

growing very fast with a very rapid urbanization. The Table 4 and 5 gives the details of

the decadal population growth and density.

Table 4: Population growth of the Town

Year Population Decadal growth %

2001 15,874

2011 19,191 20.89

2012 19,383 1.00

2016* 20,170 4.06

2023* 21,625 7.21

2031* 23,417 8.28

Table 5: Growth in Population Density

Sl. No. Year Population Gross Density

(Persons/km2)

1 2001 15,874 3174.8

2 2011 19,191 3838.2

2.15.1 Ward wise Population and Quantity of Waste (2011)

The Town has been divided into 16 municipal administrative wards and the

approximate population, households and waste generation in each of the wards

from households is set out in Table No. 6.



Table 6: Ward wise Population and Waste Generation

Ward No. Number of

Households Population

Quantity of waste generated in Kg

1 280 1,518 319

2 252 1,059 222

3 217 951 200

4 262 1,271 267

5 191 915 192

6 277 1,404 295

7 206 945 198

8 317 1,336 281

9 206 923 194

10 198 911 191

11 217 998 210

12 234 1,228 258

13 319 1,340 281

14 442 1,782 374

15 227 1,117 235

16 280 1,493 314

Total 4,125 19,191 4,030 Source: Census 2011 Population and Households Data.

2.16 WORK DONE IN THE CITY

The following sets of activities have been done by SMS Envocare Limited.

a. Field Visits and Data Collection

A team of consultants from SMS Envocare Limited had visited the various parts of

the city to understand the existing infrastructure and SWM mechanism in the city.

The team interacted with various stake holders of SWM System.

b. Primary Data Collection undertaken

Primary data collected for preparation of this report includes the following key

features:

Average waste generated by waste generators.

Physical characterization of the waste.

Quantity of Waste collected and transported to the dumping site.

Waste movement mechanism in the city.

Approximate estimation of open points in the city.

The Primary data gathered by the team of SMSEL was compiled in DPR report.

c. Secondary data collection and Assessment

Secondary Data required for the report like existing ward wise population of the

city, weather information, standard average quantity of waste generated per waste



generator, area of the city, total population of city in the past, other reports on SWM

were gathered from various sources. A review of the available documents about

Hirekerur and the studies on Solid waste management systems was done. The

gathered data was compiled as per the requirement of DPR.

d. Design and report preparation

Using the data collected by the primary resources, secondary resources and

interaction with stake holders and TP staff DPR is prepared. The DPR has

considered the future population growth and prospective increased growth in the

city. A detailed cost estimation and financial sustainability analysis has been done

and presented in the report. All the designs and estimates are provided along with

the report as annexure 1.

e. Review Process

The draft report, cost estimates, designs and drawings were submitted to TP for

review. This final DPR document has been prepared by incorporating all the

suggestions, comments and inputs of Hirekerur TP. The Hirekerur TP shall further

review the report, seek the State Government clearance as required and the final

report would be drafted to meet the requirements of using the document for

implementation.

2.16.1 Source of Waste Generation

The source wise generation is shown in Table 7:

Table 7: Source Wise Generation of Waste

Sl. No.

Different waste Generators

No. of Units

Quantity per day in KG

Total Waste generated in kg per day

1 House holds 4,343 1 4,343

2 Commercial Shops 213 0.5 106

3 Educational Institutions 51 1.5 76

4 Hotels& Restaurants 46 20 920

5 Kalyan Mantap 6 2.5 15

6 Markets 2 350 700

7 Street Sweeping - - 800

Total - - 6,960

Total waste generated per day ~ 7 TPD MSW

2.16.2 Present Quantities and Projections

The approximate quantity of Municipal Solid Waste generated is 7 TPD. TP

currently collects about 4.9 TPD per day, with about 70% efficiency. The per

capita generation of waste is estimated at 210 grams/day. If their waste

collection achieves 100% efficiency from the households, market waste, street

sweeping, Institutions and commercial waste, the overall quantification of waste

will be around 7 tons per day. SMSEL Team was quantified the waste for ensure



of the waste generation in the city the details are tabulated below.

Table 8: Waste Quantification

Sl. No. Vehicle Reg. No. Vehicle Type Timing No. of Trips Weight KGs

1 KA 27 A2670 Tractor 6.00 am

2.00 pm 02 Trips

800

1,300

2 KA 27 A2672 Tractor 6.30 am

2.30 pm 02 Trips

1,000

900

3 KA 27 G4049 Tractor 7.00 am 01 Trip 900

4,900

Based on the waste quantification, population projection and source of waste generation,

we are projected the waste generation for the next 15 years. The proposed processing

facility is considered 2016 as base design year, 2023 as intermediate year and 2031 as

ultimate design year estimated waste quantity and the classification of wastes are

presented in Table 9.

Table 9: Waste Generation and Classification (in tons per day)

Sl. No. Population Year Waste generation (MT) Project Phase

1 19,191 2011 5.00

2 19,383 2012 5.25

3 19,577 2013 5.51

4 19,773 2014 5.79

5 19,970 2015 6.08

6 20,170 2016 6.38 Base Year

7 20,372 2017 6.70

8 20,575 2018 7.04

9 20,781 2019 7.39

10 20,989 2020 7.76

11 21,199 2021 8.14

12 21,411 2022 8.55

13 21,625 2023 8.98 Intermediate Year

14 21,814 2024 9.43

15 22,060 2025 9.90

16 22,280 2026 10.39

17 22,503 2027 10.91

18 22,728 2028 11.46

19 22,955 2029 12.03

20 23,185 2030 12.63

21 23,417 2031 13.27 Ultimate Year



2.16.3 Classification of the Waste

SMSEL Team has conducted waste classification study at present disposal

site. It is found the 49 to 54% of the waste contains Organic portion, 25 to

28% is paper and plastic and other details are tabulated in the Table 10.

Table 10: Waste Classification Study

Sl. No. Materials Sample-1 Sample-2 Sample-3

% % %

1 Food Waste, Garden waste, Vegetable Waste.

53.70 48.60 50.60

2 Paper Waste, Plastic Waste, Thermocol Waste, Rubber waste

24.60 28.25 26.25

3 Soil, Stone, pebbles 21.00 22.5 22.70

4 Metal, Glass 0.70 0.65 0.45

5 E-Waste 0 0 0

Note: 1. Organic Waste- Food Waste, Garden waste, Vegetable Waste. 2. RDF- Paper Waste, Plastic Waste, Thermo coal Waste, Rubber waste.

3. Inert- Soil, Stone, Pebbles 2.17 SITE DETAILS

Integrated Solid Waste Processing Facility is located at Basarihalli Village at Sy. No. 149

(249), having extent of area is about 6 Acres 16.8 Guntas. It is 5 Kms from the Hirekerur

town and 1 Km from the Basarihalli village. The site is oriented in the West - East

direction. The contour map of the site is enclosed as drawing, Hirekerur TP Waste

Processing Facility/Dwg /01. The Site Photographs are shown below:

Figure 4: Conducting Topographical Survey



Figure 5: Conducting Topographical Survey

2.18 EXISTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE (MSW) MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:

HIREKERUR

2.18.1 Segregation at Source

There is no organized and scientifically planned segregation of MSW either at

the source level or at community bin. There is no practice of segregation of

MSW at source. However, segregation and sorting takes places by sanitary

workers engaged in the primary collection of waste to certain extent.

2.18.2 Primary & Secondary Collection System

Pourakarmikas of TP are doing the collection from household waste from of all

16 wards. Timings of the primary collection is from 6:00 am to 10:00 am in the

morning and the second trip is in the afternoon from 2.00 pm to 5.00 pm. 3

Number of tractors are engaged to collect the waste from at the designated

points for dumping of the waste in the low lying area.

2.18.3 Street Sweeping

Street sweeping is done in two shifts on daily basis on all the major and minor

roads. Every day, sweeping of main roads starts at 6.00 am in the morning and

continues till 10:30 am. Sweepers are provided with brooms. And the waste

collected from the roads is made into small heaps on the designated place and

then later in the day it is picked-up by the waste collection tractors.

2.18.4 Process and Disposal

Hirekerur TP is allotted 6 acres and 16.8 Guntas land for Integrated MSW

Processing Facility located at Basarihalli Village at Sy. No. 149 (249). Wastes

are collected by 3 tractors which are dumped at solid waste management site.

Presently, the Processing facility consists of Aerobic pad and Vermi composting

pit.



2.18.5 Bio Medical Waste

Waste generated by Private and Government Hospitals is being collected by

KSPCB Authorized agency called M/s. Sushanth Environment Technology

located Harihara Taluk, Davangere District.

2.18.6 C & D Waste

Construction and Demolition Waste is collected by Corporation or Private

agency and is dumped to low lying areas.

2.18.7 Mutton and Chicken Waste

Mutton and Chicken Waste is collected by Corporation and is dumped to low

lying areas. There is no systematic plan for disposal.

2.18.8 Bulk Waste

Bulk Waste is collected with mixed waste. Presently waste is dumping to low

lying areas.

2.19 EXISTING ASSETS AND ITS CONDITION

The following table shows the existing number of assets and its condition:

Table 11: Existing Assets Details

Sl.

No. Vehicle Reg. No Vehicle Type Condition

1 KA 27 A 2670 Tractor Good Condition

2 KA 27 A 2672 Tractor Good Condition

3 KA 27 G 4049 Tractor Good Condition

4 KA 27 2672 Sucking Machine Good Condition

2.20 Present Organization structure for MSWM

Junior Engineer is responsible for management of MSW activities in a set of wards and is

assisted by Supervisor who in turn is responsible for supervision of Pourakarmikas (PKs)

and the private contractors. The staffing pattern of the department is set out in the table

below.

Table 12: Existing Staff Details

Sl. No. Staff category / designation Manpower

1 Permanent Manpower

a PK’s for Door to Door Collection 02

b PK’s for Street Sweeping 02

c Supervisors 01

d Others 04

Total (A) 09



Sl. No. Staff category / designation Manpower

2 Outsourcing Manpower

a Drivers 05

B PK’s for Door to Door Collection 08

c PK’s for Street Sweeping 14

d Supervisors 01

e Others (Loaders) 09

Total (B) 37

Total (A+B) 46

2.20.1 Observations: Collection and Transportation

Considering the present solid waste management situation in the Hirekerur

town, the following observations are being presented for the improvement of

system.

Deficiency of staff, crews, vehicles and machinery, in particular with primary

collection (door to door collection), which needs preliminary attention for the

immediate recovery.

Staff training programs must be initiated to motivate the health workers.

Concept of segregation of waste at household level is absent, which is very

crucial to sustain good solid waste management condition.

There is lack of awareness among the general public about the solid waste

management, resulting in littering of waste everywhere.

Dry waste collection centre is absent in the city which is also a drawback for the

segregating waste at source level and deposition of dry waste.

2.21 Total expenditure incurred towards ISWM and total revenue being collected etc.

Table 13: Existing Expenditure Details

Sl No. Description Per Year

(Rs in Lakh)

1 Salaries of Permanent PK’s 21.62

2 Salaries of Outsourced PK’s 66.31

3 Fuel Cost Expenses 6.00

4 Repair Cost 2.00

5 Consumables 1.00

6 Tools 1.00

7 Others 5.00

TOTAL 102.93



Table 14: Existing Revenue Details

Particulars Amount (Rs. in lakhs)

Property tax 15.00 SWM Cess 2.92

Sale of compost, recyclables, RDF etc 0 Components of Town planning Fee, advertisement tax, birth / death certificate fee etc

63.25

Fines and fees available 2

Others -

Total 83.17

2.22 PROPOSED COLLECTION AND TRANSPORTATION OF MSW

The proposed practices for collection and transportation of MSW from various generators

as set out below.

Primary & Secondary Collection System - Households

Hirekerur Town Panchayath has proposed to door-to-door collection of MSW from

domestic households by deploying 3 Partitioned Auto Tippers (To encourage

segregation) and 7 Pushcarts (with segregation bins) from all the wards and the

same is to be transferred to 2 Tractors (with segregation facility) and transported



to processing facility (wet waste). Dry waste collected from Auto Tippers and

tractors is to be transferred to Dry Waste Collection centre.

The collection bins for individual households is not proposed by the respective

ULB (Hirekerur TP).

Primary & Secondary Collection System- Bulk Generator and Commercial

In order to facilitate collection of MSW from the bulk generators and commercial

waste dedicated one partitioned auto tipper for primary collection same is to be

transferred to the compost facility using tractor (Wet waste). Dry waste collected

from the auto tipper is to be directly transported to dry waste collection.

Primary & Secondary Collection System- Market waste and Bus stand

In order to facilitate collection of MSW from Market waste, Bus stands Waste and

other waste, proposing 6 Pushcarts (with segregation bins) and transferred to one

tractor of 01 trip. The wet waste and dry waste collected from the tractor is to be

transported to processing facility and dry waste collection centre respectively.

Primary & Secondary Collection System- Drain Waste

Drains waste shall be temporarily stored is small heaps on the road sides until

dried (2 days) and collected and transported to Processing Facility using Tractor.

Primary & Secondary Collection System- Street Sweeping

Street sweeping activity in the city is carried out by the PKs and classified into

three categories depending upon the frequency of sweeping & collection namely; A

type roads (daily collection), B type roads (collection twice a week) and C type

roads (once a week). The waste is collected through 12 wheeled bins and the

same is transferred to 1 Tractor. The street sweepings and the silt collected from

the road.

The estimated road length in Hirekerur is 54 km, road classification and proposed

Staff deployment for collection and transportation mentioned in the below table.

Table 15: Road classification

Sl. No. Classification of Roads Road Length (Km)

1 Type A (Sweeping on a daily basis) 6

2 Type B (Sweeping twice a week) 8

3 Type C (Sweeping once a week) 40

Total Road Length 54

Secondary Transportation

The Secondary Collection and Transportation for drain waste and street sweeping

is deployed by 1 tractor. The Secondary Collection and Transportation from

households is deployed by 2 tractors



The MSW collected from open collection points is transported to the Existing

Integrated MSW Facility by using tractor.

Dry Waste Collection Center

To encourage the segregation, 01 dry waste collection centers is proposed, located

near to Channalli road (TPL No. 237/6) logically at South direction of the Town of

dimension 15m x 7m. The details of estimates are given in Reference IMSW08. The

detailed of drawing is given in SMS/HKR/011.

In dry waste collection centre dry waste will be further segregated into paper,

plastic, cardboard, glass, metal waste etc., TP will identify the vendors for the

sale of DWCC output in order to develop the idea of zero solid waste

management.

Initialization of zero waste management plan will start from ward where dry

waste collection centre is present, by practicing 100% collection efficiency and

segregation of the waste. Later, in future years TP will encourage in extension

of the same plan in all consecutive wards.

Bio Medical Waste

Waste generated by Private and Government Hospitals is being collected by KSPCB

Authorized agency called M/s. Sushanth Environment Technology located in

Harihara Taluk, Davangere District.

E - Waste

This category of waste is not being generated in Hirekerur TP. As a precautionary

measure a container will be kept for the storage of E-waste on the site. In case of E-

waste generation, TP will also encourage Private Operator to collect the

segregated E-waste and send it to KSPCB Authorized recycling dealers /

centralized e-waste processing facility.

C & D Waste

It is proposed to collect Construction and Demolition Waste by TP or Private

agency and dumped to designated area. An area extent of 6000 Sqm is been

dedicated for dumping of C & D waste in the proposed dry waste collection centre

area located near Channalli road (TPL No. 237/6). The NOC from Karnataka State

Pollution Control Board is required for the utilization of dedicated area in the

mentioned location.

This category of waste is being generated in small quantity; if quantity increases

gradually then TP will encourage Private Operator to collect the segregated waste

and to recycle the waste produced as, by- products such as Aggregates, Sand,

Hallow blocks and pavement blocker etc.

Mutton and Chicken Waste

TP is generating this category of the waste is small quantity; this is handling by



decomposition by aerobic composting. If quantity is gradually increase will sent to

nearby incinerators / Slaughter house.

The tractor which is provided for secondary collection can be made use for

handling and processing the waste in its free available time. Tractor can be used to

make the waste into a windrow on the composting pad as per the design and other

related works to be taken care by it.

The Normative Standards for Municipal Solid Waste Management are considered for Staff

deployment and Asset calculations.

Table 16: Staff Deployment for Collection and Transportation

Sl No

Particular Skilled Semiskilled/

Unskilled

Weekly Off for Driver/

Skilled

Weekly Off for Semiskilled/

Unskilled Total

A. Primary Collection (D2D)

1

Auto Tipper (3 autos for Approx. 3000 Household

Collection)

3 3 0 0 6

2

Push Carts (7 Push Cart for

1300 Household collection)

0 7 0 0 7

3

Market waste collection / Bus stand by using

Push Cart

0 3 0 0 3

4

1 Auto Tipper -Commercial

Waste Collection and working has

Back-up in Breakdown of

Other Auto Tipper

1 1 0 0 2

B. Street Sweeping

1 A Type Road (6

km) 0 6 0 0 6

2 B Type Road (8

km) 0 2 0 0 2

3 C Type Road (40

km) 0 4 0 0 4

4 Sucking Machine 0 0 0 0 0

5 JCB 0 0 0 0 0



Sl No

Particular Skilled Semiskilled/

Unskilled

Weekly Off for Driver/

Skilled

Weekly Off for Semiskilled/

Unskilled Total

C. Dry Waste Collection

Centre 0 1 0 0 1

D. Secondary Transportation

1 Tractor 3 6 0 0 9

Total 7 33 0 0 40

Absentees 1 0 0 0 1

Grand Total 8 33 0 0 41

SHGs (Self Help Groups)

Hirekerur TP is trying to encourage Self Help Groups (SHGs) to take up solid waste

management in specified zones in the town consisting of 5 to 6 wards where they can

collect, segregate and process the solid waste. Self Help Groups can comparatively reduce

the total O and M expenditure for door to door collection, processing & disposal of waste

than the unusual outsourcing contracts. Self help groups will contribute to the additional

requirements of Manpower and to the reduction of the overall MSWM Operational costs.

Local body can share the profit with SHGs in compost generated and material recovery

and there by minimize the gap of income to SHGs.

2.23 Proposed Assets for Collection and Transportation and Processing facility of

MSW

Table 17: Proposed Assets for Collection & Transportation and Processing Facility

Sl. No.

Infrastructure Quantity of waste Handled

Trips Households Proposed Existing Back Ups

Additional

Primary Collection

1 Auto Tippers for Primary Collection

44% of Waste = 3.1 TPD

02 Trips

3000 3 2 0 1

2 Pushcarts for

Primary Collection

19% of Waste = 1.3 TPD

01 Trip

1300 7 0 1 8

3 Wheeled Bins

for Street Sweeping 24% of

Waste = 1.7 TPD

12 0 0 12

4

Push Carts for Market, Bus

stand and Others

1+1+1=3 0 2 5

5 Auto Tipper

for 13% of Waste =

01 Trip

1 0 0 1



Sl. No.

Infrastructure Quantity of waste Handled

Trips Households Proposed Existing Back Ups

Additional

Commercial 0.9 TPD

Secondary Collection

1

Tractor with Trailer for Household Waste and

Commercial Waste, Market waste, Street

sweeping waste and

Drain Waste

100% of Waste = 7 TPD

02 Trips

3 3 0 0

Processing Facility

1 Back Hoe

Loader 1 0 0 1

Table 18: List of equipment, machineries and vehicles required

Sl. No. Type of Vehicles Proposed No’s

as per DPR Existing

Nos. No’s to be procured

1 Push carts 13 0 13

2 Wheeled Bins 12 0 12

2 Auto tippers / Mini tippers/Tata Ace

4 0 4

3 Tractor with Trailer 3 3 0

4 Weighbridge 1 0 1

5 Baling machines 1 0 1

6 Screening machines (Trommel / vibratory screens)- 16mm/4mm)

1 0 1

7 Back Hoe Loader 1 0 1

8 Sucking Machine 1 0 1

2.24 Micro level planning for Primary Collection

The auto tippers proposed for primary collection is 03 Numbers and pushcarts for

primary collection are 7 numbers. The number of auto tippers allotted for commercial

waste is 1 numbers. The detailed micro level planning for primary collection is shown in

below table 19 & 20. Routing Map for Micro level Planning is enclosed in Annexure 3.



Table 19: Micro Level Planning for Primary Collection from Households

Sl. No. Type of Primary

Collection vehicle

No. of

Trips Wards

Location

Major Roads & Area Name

No. of House

Holds

Total number

of House Holds

1

Pushcarts No. 1 & 2

1

Ward No. 1 Hosur Main Road, Manjunatha Nagar &

Raghavendra Colony 343

798 Pushcart No. 3 Ward No. 2 Gurubhavana, PWD, SBI, Sarvagna Circle 240

Pushcart No. 4 Ward No. 3 Banakar Chal, Mini Vidhana Soudha and

Ambedkar Nagar Main Road 215

2 Auto Tipper No. 1 2

Ward No. 4 Market Road and Durgadevi Temple road 288

1,027

Ward No. 5 Durga Nagar and Tippu Nagar 207

Ward No. 6 Namdevgalli, Vittal Nagar 5th main road and

1st cross road. 318

Ward No. 7 Masur Road, Chouwdeshwari Nagar and

Hampali House Opposite 214

3 Auto Tipper No. 2 2

Ward No. 8

Kalidasa Nagar (506 Cross Road), Balegara

Oni, Kalidasa Nagar (503 Main Road) and

Channali Main road

302

943

Ward No. 9

Vijayanagar 1st Main Road, Janantha Plot,

Thippashetty Plot and Vijayanagar 6th Cross

road

209

Ward No. 10 Azad Nagar (1st Main Road and 6th Cross

road) and Jatpatnagar 2nd Main road 206

Ward No. 11

Jatpatnagar 1st main road, Taj Nagar 3rd Cross

road, Mulla Plot 1st A Main Road,

Ibrahim Nagar 1sr Cross road and Ibrahim

Nagar 3rd Cross to Basveshwara Nagar

226

4 Auto Tipper No. 3 Ward No. 12 Basaveshwara Nagar (East main road, 1st 278 919



Sl. No. Type of Primary

Collection vehicle

No. of

Trips Wards

Location

Major Roads & Area Name

No. of House

Holds

Total number

of House Holds

main road, 1st C main road, 7th A Cross, 9th B

Cross)

2

Ward No. 13 Behind CES College (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Main

road), Thambakadli Nagar 1st main Road. 303

Ward No. 16 Azad Nagar (10th south road and 1st Main

road) and Mughalalli Plot (3rd Cross road) 338

5

Pushcarts No. 5 & 6 1 Ward No. 14

KHB Colony (1st Cross Road, 3rd Cross road,

6th Cross Road, 1st Main road and 14th Cross

road)

403

656

Pushcart No. 7 1 Ward No. 15

Pump House ( 2,3,4,5,6 Cross Road), Town

Panchayath, AshrayaYoja Badavane, 1st cross

road, 1st main road, 6th cross road and 4th main

road

253

*Projected households for 2016



Table 20: Micro Level Planning for Primary Collection from Commercial Waste,

Market Waste, Street Sweeping etc.,

Sl. No. Particulars Type of Vehicle

1 Household Waste 3 Auto Tipper 7 Pushcarts 1 Tractor

2 Commercial Waste 1 Auto Tipper 1 Tractor

3 Market Waste 1 Pushcart

1 Tractor 4 Bus stand and Other Waste 2 Pushcarts

5 Street Sweeping 12 Wheeled Bins

6 Drain Waste -

7 Back Up 3 Pushcarts



3. PART B: TECHNOLOGY

The ISWM concept is closely linked to the 3R approach, which is also aimed at optimizing

the management of municipal solid waste and processing of all kinds of waste to promote

zero-landfilling concept. The hierarchy of ISWM concept ranges from most preferred to

least preferred. At source reduction and reuse is preferred most followed by Recycling,

Composting, and Waste to Energy and landfilling. As per the ISWM hierarchy, landfilling is

the last option to be adopted in case any of the above technology is not applicable. The

process flow and design of selected technology has also been explained in detail.

3.1 TECHNOLOGY OPTION

The technology Options for Segregated waste is as follows

I. Organic waste

a) Aerobic composting

Aerobic composting involves the stabilization of the organics into compost

by microorganisms, which require the oxygen in air for their survival and

growth. During this process of conversion heat is released. There are ideal

limits for different parameters within which these microorganisms survive.

Adequate moisture is required for the microorganisms to survive and

composting to take place. If these conditions are ensured, the compost

quality and time of composting can be controlled. In batch conditions the

composting process continues at progressively reducing rate as the oxygen

becomes a limiting factor or organics get consumed. To ensure the survival

of these organisms the availability of oxygen in the waste being composted

has to be ensured through provision of air. For economic reasons the time

of composting is restricted till the major conversion is done and

subsequently compost maturing is taken up till the compost is safe for

application to plants. The organics typically have high moisture and in the

compost process this is removed. There are different possible



configurations of holding waste and providing air for aerobic composting.

The selection of this is based on economics and competence in handling

technology.

The various parameters, which affect the composting process and the

compost quality, are organism’s population, carbon Nitrogen ratio,

temperature, aeration and moisture. The above-mentioned controlling

parameters need to be monitored in the industrial scale plant. In large

composting operations it is necessary to monitor the wastewater, which

comes out of the organic waste, called leachate. The production of this

leachate has to be minimized and whatever leachate is generated has to be

collected and reused for maintaining the moisture content of the heap and

as inoculums. Organic waste processing technology is most successful in

Indian regional condition.

b) Vermi Composting

The vermi composting process starts with partially decomposed organic

waste (preferably market waste). The waste that has undergone

degradation for 15-20 days is used for vermi composting. The earthworms

eat the partially decomposed waste and produce casting. The casting of the

worms is the vermin compost. The degradation process in vermi

composting takes places inside the worm body by microorganisms. The

selection of worms to obtain the best yield per worm is available. The crux

in this process is to get the worms to survive. The conditions for survival of

the worms have to be maintained in terms of the food availability, food

quality, moisture content and safety from predators. Another important

aspect is that the vermi castings have to be routinely removed. The whole

vermi composting operation has to be done manually and require more

care and effort. In terms of the infrastructure requirement the vermi

composting takes off from the aerobic composting and simple covered

sheds are adequate. It is option to process the waste, depending upon the

vermi compost demand Hirekerur TP have plan to implement shortly in

existing pits.

c) Bio-Methanation

Biomethanation is a scientific process whereby anaerobic microorganisms

in an anoxic environment decompose biodegradable matter. Anaerobic

digestion (AD) of organic material, another way of terming the above

process, can be applied in mechanisms called biogas digesters to produce

commercially applicable, stable compounds. The two outputs from

anaerobic digestion are digestate, a nutrient-rich, sterile, organic sludge

that can often be applied as a fertilizer (NNFCC 2009). Biogas, a mixture

consisting of approximately 60 percent methane (CH4) and 40 percent

carbon dioxide (CO2), retains upwards of 90 percent of the energy from the



initial degraded organic matter (IEA 2005). For this reason, capturing the

byproduct of this natural process in biogas digesters represents an efficient

potential source of energy.

The overall process of anaerobic digestion can be separated into four

stages: pretreatment, digestion of waste, recovery of gas byproduct, and

treatment of the digested slurry.

The segregated organic waste will be brought to the plant site. It will

further be crushed along with water to form slurry.

This slurry will be fed into the inlet mixing chamber

The mixed slurry will then be feed to the main bio digester

The main digester will be convert organic waste into Biogas and liquid

Organic manure

Liquid organic manure will be collected in outer pit which can use for

gardening purpose.

The biogas generated from the main digester will be collected in biogas

holder, which will be cleaned and can be used for thermal application or

power generation.

It is one more option to process the waste, depending upon the Biogas/power

requirement in the site TP have planned to implement this technology.



II. Dry Waste

The segregated dry waste consisting of plastic, Glass, Paper, Metallic parts,

packing material etc. is having very low bulk density and occupies lot of

precious space for even small quantities. To solve this problem,

Baling/Compacting of this material is a very economical solution. The Hydraulic

Baler press Systems operates with a very simple mechanism that compresses

the dry matter at a very high pressure to convert it into Bales of suitable size.

To encourage the segregation, 01 dry waste collection centers is proposed,

located near to Channalli road (TPL No. 237/6) logically at South direction of

the Town of dimension 14m x 9m. The details of estimates are given in

Reference IMSW08. The detailed of drawing is given in SMS/HKR/011.

The Process:

The segregated dry waste of 100 kgs/m3 bulk density is fed into the feeding

hopper of the Baler. The material is compacter to 50 % volume in the Baler. The

bales can be stored and used as RDF. This can be sale to cement industry and

Boiler industries. TP have planned to propose the bailing unit in the processing

facility.

III. Chicken waste & slaughter waste

This is a term applied to dead animals that die naturally or accidentally killed.

This category does not include carcass and animal parts from slaughter houses

which are regarded as industrial wastes. Dead animals are divided into two

groups, large and small. Among the large animals are horses, cows, goats, sheep,

hogs and the like. Small animals include dogs, cats, rabbits and rats. The reason

for this differentiation is that large animals require special equipment for lifting

and handling during their removal. If not collected promptly, dead animals are a

threat to public health because they attract flies and other vermin as they

putrefy. Their presence in public places is particularly offensive and emits foul

smell from the aesthetic point of view.

TP is generating this category of the waste in small quantity; this waste is

handled by decomposition by aerobic composting. If quantity is gradually

increasing, it will be sent to nearby KSPCB Approved incinerators.

IV. Inert waste

Landfill

The MSW Management rules 2000 mandate that each municipal authority shall

set up an engineered landfill for the disposal of waste. It directs as follows.

Land filling shall be restricted to non-biodegradable, inert wastes and other

wastes which are not suitable for recycling and for biological processing.



Land filling shall also be carried out for residues of waste processing facilities as

well as pre-processing rejects from waste processing facilities.

V. Household hazardous waste

Hazardous wastes may be defined as wastes of industrial, institutional or

consumer origin which, because of their physical, chemical or biological

characteristics are potentially dangerous to human and the environment. In

some cases although the active agents may be liquid or gaseous, they are

classified as solid wastes because they are confined in solid containers. Typical

examples are solvents, paints and pesticides whose spent containers are

frequently mixed with municipal wastes and become part of the urban waste

stream. Certain hazardous wastes cause explosions in incinerators and fires at

landfill sites. Others, such as pathological wastes from hospitals and radioactive

wastes, require special handling at all time.

The Hazardous Waste can be stored in Containers on the Site. The Container

should be in closed, in good condition and chemically compatible. It should be

kept on impervious surface and undercover. Good management practice should

ensure that hazardous wastes are stored, collected, transported and disposed

off separately, preferably stored in plant as per the hazardous waste handling

rules and sent to centralized Processing facility authorized by the Karnataka

State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB).

VI. E- Waste

"E-wastes are considered dangerous, as certain components of some electronic

products contain materials that are hazardous, depending on their condition

and density. The hazardous content of these materials pose a threat to human

health and environment. Discarded computers, televisions, VCRs, stereos,

copiers, fax machines, electric lamps, cell phones, audio equipment and

batteries if improperly disposed can leach lead and other substances into soil

and groundwater. Many of these products can be reused, refurbished, or

recycled in an environmentally sound manner so that they are less harmful to

the ecosystem. TP is encouraging Private Operator to collect the segregated

waste and send to KSPCB Authorized recycling dealers / centralized e-waste

processing facility.

A container is kept for the storage of E waste on the site for preventing any

further ground water contamination. It should be kept on impervious surface

and undercover. The waste is collected for a particular time period and then

sold to recyclers.

VII. Construction and demolition waste (C&D Waste)

Construction and demolition wastes are the waste materials generated by the

construction, refurbishment, repair and demolition of houses, commercial



buildings and other structures. It mainly consists of earth, stones, concrete,

bricks, lumber, roofing materials, plumbing materials, heating systems and

electrical wires and parts of the general municipal waste stream, but when

generated in large amounts at building and demolition sites, it is generally

removed by contractors for filling low designated area and by urban local

bodies for disposal at landfills. If Considerable quantity generates TP is

encouraging Private Operator collects the segregated waste to recycle the waste

produced as by- products as Aggregates, Sand, Hallow blocks and pavement

blocker etc.

VIII. Bio- Medical waste

Biomedical waste generated from the hospitals, nursing home and clinics shall

be collected separate and sent to nearby Bio-medical incinerators /tie-up with

the KSPCB Authorized Bio-medical waste processing Operator namely M/s.

Sushanth Environment Technology located at Harihara Taluk, Davangere

District.

3.2 OVERALL PROPOSAL FOR THE PROJECT

The solid waste management at the waste management facility would consist of two-

stage process. The first stage would involve processing of the wastes and the second stage

would be the disposal to secured landfill. The processing of the waste will be undertaken

so that the organic components of the waste are stabilized by aerobic composting

method. The rejects in the process will be land filled. The recyclable materials will be

recovered from the waste and sold.

The incoming wastes at the waste management site will be weighed and a register of

waste receipt would be maintained. The mixed municipal solid wastes which can be

composted will be directed to the composting facility. The rejects from the composting

facility is sent to the landfill. Any hazardous materials will be refused for the intake. The

landfill is as per the sanitary landfill standards prescribed in the MSW (M & H) rules

2000. The capacity of each of the facility is assessed. The design life of the integrated

processing facility is 15 years. After this period the facility can be upgraded to meet the

increased demands of waste generation. The processing facility for the organic wastes is

designed for 8 tons per day. The design takes into consideration of the intake of waste for

the processing facility such that the waste will be gradually increased over the years. This

is adequate for the present collection of waste in un-segregated form. As the collection

improves the segregation is also expected and consequently the proposed system should

be adequate for the next 15 years.

The waste to be handled over the period has been estimated in Table 9. The waste after

inertising by compost, the reject materials are only 20%. The waste to be land filled over

the next 15 years has been given below. The design of the landfill has been undertaken to



meet the constraints of the site and the number of years have been assessed and

presented in the design.

3.3 Implementation of 3R’s Concept

The proposed Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management facility includes the

implementation of 3R’s concept that is; reduce, reuse and recycle. The responsibility of

3R concept will spread across the individuals, household members, production firms and

Municipal authorities.

According to the Material balance details the estimated quantity of waste (Plastic, Paper

& Cardboard) from dry waste collection centre is approximately 2 TPD. The approximate

quantity of recyclables is 0.8 TPD, RDF is 1.44 TPD and Compost is 1.12 TPD.

The segregated dry waste (inorganic waste) from dry waste collection centre consisting

of Packing material, Rubber, Clothes, Thermocol, Wood etc., will have very low bulk

density and occupies lot of precious space for even small quantities. The Hydraulic Baler

press Systems operates with a very simple mechanism that compresses the dry matter at

a very high pressure to convert it into Bales of suitable size. The material is compacted to

50 % of its volume in the Baler. The bales can be stored and used as RDF; it can be

auctioned to cement industry and Boiler industries which in-turn generates the revenue.

The dry waste like plastic and paper can be further segregated and auctioned to recyclers.

The segregated wet waste (organic waste) consisting of food waste, garden waste,

vegetable waste etc., is processed through aerobic composting and vermi-composting.

The product (compost/ fertilizer) from composting can be auctioned to agricultural units.

The brief implementation plan for 3R’s is shown in the below figure.



Figure: 3R’s Implementation Plan



4. PART C: COMMON FACILITY DEVELOPMENT

4.1 INTRODUCTION

The design for the inertising facility and the landfill has been done for a time period of 15

years. To undertake these activities there are minimum common development required.

This section details the list of these facilities and gives their specifications.

4.2 OBSERVATIONS

Existing SWM site is located at Basarihalli village of an extent 6 Acres 16.8 Guntas

which is insufficient for future expansion to perform the ultimate design capacity.

Landfill area is not present at the SWM Site.

Office Building and Toilet is not present for Staffs in the SWM site.

No Shelter for Reception cum Monsoon pad.

Storage and Recycling shed is not present.

Processing Equipments are not present at the processing facility.

Absence of adequate Aerobic composting pad.

Roads are not asphalted and Drains are not present.

There are no vehicles to perform windrow turning, transportation of waste and

finished products within the site.

4.3 OVERALL LAYOUT OF THE SITE

The general arrangement and the overall layout of the site are presented in drawing

number Hirekerur waste Processing facility/SMS/HKR/002. It is proposed that the area

to the south of the site be set aside for stocking of the soil excavated during development

so that it can used as cover materials. The main site is divided into two parts. The area to

the North West is used for the setting up of the processing plant, while the area to the

East is used as the sanitary landfill. The waste is collected in the Reception Area and then

sent to the Windrow formation in the Aerobic Shed. It is proposed to have a 5 m wide

road and green fence along the edge of the site. The compost plant area would have the

required facilities including the aerobic composting yard, processing shed, roads, and

other facilities. Since landfill falls under small landfill would proposed solar evaporation

pond as Leachate treatment plant. Generated Leachate will be utilized for moisture

retention in windrows. The detailed civil structures (Existing and Proposed) are shown in

the table below.

Table 21: Details of Civil structures (Existing and Proposed)

Sl. No. Name of the building / civil

structure Existing Proposed

1 Compound wall / fencing Yes No

2 Watchman shed Yes No

3 Weighbridge room No Yes



Sl. No. Name of the building / civil

structure Existing Proposed

4 Pre-sorting shed No No

5 Windrow platform No Yes

6 Shelter for Reception Area No Yes

7 Windrow platform shed (if proposed) No No

8 Processing shed (screening, packaging

etc) Yes No

9 Laboratory No No

10 Workers quarters / Rest rooms / toilets

etc No No

11 Vehicle shed / garage No No

12 Storage sheds No Yes

13 Vermi composting sheds No No

14 Dry waste / recycling waste shed No Yes

15 Leachate collection and treatment

system No Yes

16 Sanitary landfill facilities No Yes

17 Roads, Drains, Deck slab, Green belt No Yes

18 Monitoring Well No Yes

19 Wheel Washing Facility No No

4.4 COMMON FACILITY DESIGN

4.4.1 Road

The SWM site is 5 Km away from Hirekerur city near Basarihalli. Access road of

410 m is to be constructed, which will be considered in future phase. It is

proposed to have roads of width 5 meter and 341 meter length. The details of

the estimates are given in Reference IMSW02. The detailed is given in Drawing

SMS/HKR/003.

4.4.2 Weigh bridge

It is proposed to have a 30 MT weighbridge for the facility. The size of Weigh

Bridge is 7m length and 3m width pit type of reputed make. The details of the

estimates are given in Reference IMSW24.

4.4.3 Boundary Green fence & green layout within the facility

1.5 m wide green fence is proposed all around the site. The green fence would

consist of 3 rows of shrubs plants and trees, which would hide the area from

external viewing and also provide a better ambience and smell to the area. In

addition the vacant areas in the landfill and the compost plant areas kept aside

for future development can also be developed into green cover areas. Some of

the common shrub plants which can be used for fencing purpose and trees

grown in Haveri District are presented in the below table.



Table: Common Flora of the Haveri District

Sl.

No. Shrub Species Tree Species

1 Paper Flower (Bougainvillia

glabra) Gobbali, karijali (Acacia Arabica)

2 Big Sage (Lantana camara) Hunase (Tamarindus indica)

3 Oleander (Nerium indicum) Bevu, Neem (Azadirachta indica)

4 Gloria (Ipomoea carnea) Neelgiri (Eucalyptus citriadra)

5 Hibiscus (Hibiscus rosa) Subabul (Leucaena leucocephala)

4.4.4 Monitoring wells

It is proposed that one monitoring bore wells be used for monitoring

contamination. The details of estimates are given in reference IMSW07.

4.4.5 Storage cum Recycling Shed

To support the segregation of the recyclable materials at the processing facility,

it is proposed to have a recycling building of dimensions 10 m x 6 m. It would be

a masonry construction with sloping roof. The details of estimates are given in

Reference IMSW14 and IMSW15 and Drawing No. SMS/HKR/010.

4.4.6 Plant and Yard Lighting

It is not proposed that the waste processing facility would be used in the night.

Consequently it is proposed that the Aerobic Composting pad, plant area, the

access roads, the landfill area would have minimum lighting facility so that in

case of emergency requirements. 10 numbers of Street lights are proposed to be

installed at the site. The details of estimates are given in Reference IMSW19.

4.4.7 Power Connection

Power connections with 35 KVA is proposed from HESCOM. The details of


4.4.8 35KVA DG Back Up

35 KVA DG is proposed for back up for un-interrupted operations. The details of


4.4.9 Fire Safety, Tools & Tackles

It is proposed safety, tools & tackles for maintenance. The details of estimates

are given in Reference IMSW21, 22 & 23.

4.4.10 Deck Slab

Deck Slab of dimension 6m x 3.1m is proposed. The details of estimates are given

in Reference IMSW06. The detailed of drawing is given in SMS/HKR/09.



4.4.11 Dry Waste Collection Centre

A Dry Waste Collection Centre of size 15 m x 7 m is provided at the city centre

for segregation of plastic waste. The location for dry waste collection centre is

selected at Channalli Main road. The details of estimates are given in Reference

IMSW08 & drawing SMS/HKR/011.

4.4.12 Vermi Composting Facility

Vermi Composting Pit is already constructed, the Dimension is 20.5 x 8 m and

pit dimension 16m x 2m x 1m – 3 No’s. It is in good condition, hence we are not

considered in our DPR Estimation.

4.4.13 Shelter for Reception cum Monsoon Area

A shelter of size 22 x 15.36 m is provided for existing aerobic pad. For this pad,

proposed to use as a reception cum monsoon shed for safe storage of waste in

Breakdown period and Rainy season. The details of estimates are given in

Reference IMSW12 and Drawing SMS/HKR/004.

4.4.14 Processing pad

Existing processing pad is utilized for the waste processing. The pad have

dimension of 17 m x 7.71 m.

4.4.15 Ramp

A Ramp of size 10.8 m x 6.15 m is provided at the city centre for unloading the

waste from the auto tipper to the Tractor. The location for ramp is selected near

Channalli Main road. The details of estimates are given in reference IMSW09 &

drawing SMS/HKR/013.

4.4.16 Nala

A Nala of length 28 m is to be constructed at the processing facility. The details of

estimates are given in reference IMSW05.

4.4.17 Pipeline to Aerobic Pad

Pipeline is proposed from borewell to Aerobic Pad. The details of estimates are

given in Reference IMSW03.



5. PART D: COMPOSTING FACILITY

5.1 DESIGN CHOICES

There are many alternative approaches, which have been adopted for composting of

municipal solid wastes based on the broad principle of aerobic composting. The following

approach has been adopted for Hirekerur. The waste as received is in reception area and

sending to formed into aerobic compost yard for windrows formation. 15 day material

storing area Roof is proposed in the composting yard, this would take care in operation

for the monsoon months. The design based on a 35-day waste composting cycle with

additional provision in Reception cum Monsoon Shed for additional waste load and for

management during monsoon and electro-mechanical equipment breakdown period.

5.2 SPRAYING OF WASTE WITH EM SOLUTION

Enhanced Microbial solution (EM) is a liquid concentrate containing natural micro-

organisms which helps in the degradation of the organic compound. The use of EM

Solution in the compost eliminates rotting from the compost heap. The process

completely represses unpleasant smells and toxic metabolic by-products (odor

Suppression), but it produces vitamins and bioactive substances. Another advantage of

using EM Solution is that it is no longer necessary to frequently turn over the heap during

composting, as it now ferments an-aerobically. The nutrients, and especially the nitrogen,

are retained and are not lost as greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. The nitrogen is

mainly locked in with organic bonds, i.e. relatively little is mineralized and so more

nutrients are retained in the soil.

5.3 DESIGN BASIS

5.3.1 Sizing of plant

The composting plant has been classified into 2 parts. The inertising part, which

is the basic composting process consisting of the wastes windrowing process

including its turning so that a stabilized material is produced. The second part is

the compost segregation plant (refinement section) where the stabilized wastes

are segregated into compost and rejects. As discussed previously the

inertisation facility is designed for next five year to handle 8 tons per day.

The proposed facility will handle mixed waste as well as segregated waste.

5.4 THE PROCESS FLOW

The step-by-step process operations are given below. The various aspects, which come

into play at each of the steps, are also given.



STABILIZING PROCESS

STEP 1: The waste is received at the gate in trucks. A detailed record on incoming

wastes is maintained at the gate. A time record of the staff and visitors is also

there at the gate. The waste is weighed regularly by means of Weigh Bridge

and recorded.

STEP 2: The incoming vehicle directly goes and unloads the waste at the reception

area followed by presorting section. As soon as the waste is unloaded the large

substances like tyres, which cannot be screened, would be manually removed.

STEP 3: Then the back hoe loader is used to make the waste into a windrow on the

composting pad as per the design. The windrow is then sprayed with cow

dung or bio culture / EM Solution. The cow dung or bio culture slurry is made

in mixing tank which shall be provided. It is then pumped on to a slurry tank

mounted on a trailer along with the pump. A tractor transports the tank trailer

to the windrow site where slurry is sprayed on the fresh windrow.

STEP 4: On 7th day from start, the first windrow is dismantled and the waste is

transferred to the second windrow pad using the back hoe loader. The waste

volume would have reduced by about 20 % compared to start with moisture

reduction and degradation. The place where the waste is dismantled would

receive the fresh waste for forming the first windrow. While forming the

second windrow addition of inoculums, slurry and water to maintain the

moisture is sprayed/applied using the trailer mounted slurry tank. The

temperature profile in the second windrow is monitored. The leachate from

the windrow is collected in the drain.

STEP 5: At 14 days from start the second windrow is dismantled using back hoe

loader. The waste volume would have reduced by about 20 % compared to

start of windrow 2 with moisture reduction and degradation. The balance of

the waste is reformed into the third windrow. Addition of water is undertaken

if required. The temperature profile in the third windrow is monitored. No

leachate is expected from now on.

STEP 6: At 21 days from start the third windrow is dismantled using the back hoe


start of windrow 3. The wastes are reformed into the fourth windrow.

Addition of water is undertaken if required. The temperature profile in the

fourth windrow is monitored.

STEP 7: At 28 days from start the fourth windrow is dismantled using the back hoe


start of windrow 4. The wastes are reformed into the fifth windrow. Addition



of water is undertaken if required. The temperature profile in the fifth

windrow is monitored. This is the maturing stage of the compost.

STEP 8: At 35 days from start the fifth windrow is dismantled using a back hoe loader.

The waste is now transferred to the refinement section for processing. The

waste volume would have reduced by about 10 % compared to start of

windrow 5.

STEP 9: After curing the waste material is fed in to Dual Trommel of size 16 mm and 4

mm. The material are fed into the rotary sieve, and the product obtained from

less than 4 mm is fed into the de-stoner and is further processed with

admixtures or bagged directly for the sale. Similarly the same process is

followed for the product obtained from sieving the material sized between 16

mm and 4 mm.

The material size between 16 mm and 4 mm is sold as grade-B compost and

the waste less than 4 mm is ‘A’ grade-compost. Additional products with

different admixtures are made and sold as niche products. The present design

does not provide the mixing and grinding facility for compost up-gradation, as

this would depend on marketing plans. Space for provision of these facilities is

provided. Bagging is proposed manually.

STEP 10: Materials recovery from the rejects is undertaken and the recyclables are

stored in the recyclables shed.

STEP 11: The rejects are taken out for disposal in landfill daily. The recyclables are

sold when adequate quantity is available for transport. The compost is sold

as per demand.

5.5 PROCESS FLOW CHART

The process flow chart is given in chart 3. The process flow chart traces the movement of

the waste from the time it enters the composting plant till it is disposed off out of the

plant. It includes the composting, processing and the rejects handling.



Chart 2: Process Flow Chart with Material Balance



Chart 3: Process Flow Chart

5.6 FACILITY DESIGN

5.6.1 Project Layout

The layout of the various facilities is shown in the drawing number Hirekerur

waste Processing facility/SMS/HKR/002. The layout includes all the facilities

including the stabilizing yard (aerobic yard), the processing facility and the

landfill. Based on the final plan of operation the specific facilities be added or

excluded from the construction plan. The waste received is weighed and

recorded and then taken to the composting yard. At the composting yard the

waste is windrowed and processed. Then it is taken for processing, where it is

processed and stored for bagging and sale. All the required facilities and

infrastructure is built up. The detailed requirements and their specifications are

given in the subsequent sections.

Waste Receipt at gate,

weighing and recording

16 &4 mm dual Rotary sieve

Less than 4 mm – Grade A More than 4 mm -Grade B

After five turning (weekly once)

Reception Area &Presorting

Feeding Conveyor

Feeding to de-stoner

Adding Nutrients (NPK)

Feeding to de-stoner

Bagging and Sale

Bagging and Sale



5.6.2 Civil Works Design

5.6.2.1 Aerobic Compost Pad

The incoming waste is made into windrows, treated, turned and made

into compost at the composting yard. The leachate from the waste is

generated in the composting yard, which is a potential ground

contaminant. The MSW rules insist on a concrete platform for use as the

composting yard. The details of the platform are given in drawing

number Hirekerur waste Processing facility/SMS/HKR/05. The

incoming waste is made in to windrows and turned and the ideal layout

of the windrows is one, which occupies minimum area and is

convenient for shifting of waste. The Drawing SMS/HKR/05 gives the

assumptions and area and dimensions of the different stages of

windrows. Based on this data the ideal compost yard layout is made.

The size required of the compost yard is 31 m x 34 m, a total area of

1054 m2. The flooring of the aerobic pad is designed for 8T for five next

years in Phase I. Future expansion of the designed facility will be taken

up in subsequent phases. The details of estimates are given in

Reference IMSW12 and drawing SMS/HKR/05.

DESIGN OF AEROBIC COMPOSTING PAD

Plant Capacity: 8 TPD

Quantity of waste as street sweeping and recyclable waste is considered 20%

= 8*0.8

= 6.4 TPD.

Volume of waste considering 500 kgs/m3 of waste density = 6.45/0.5

= 12.89 m3.

Length Calculation

Considering windrow width =3 m

Considering windrow height =1.5 m

Cross sectional area = (3.14 * 3 * 1.5) / 4

=3.53 m2

Length of windrow = 12.89/3.53

= 3.65 ̴ 4 m

*Considering each windrow of Length 4 m.

Aggregate length of windrow = 7 * 4

= 28 m

Providing end spacing = 3 * 2

= 6 m



Total length of windrow = 28 + 6

= 34 m

*Total Length of windrow is 34 m.

Width Calculations

Total number of windrows = 5 No’s

Number of windrows with width 3m = 3

Number of windrows with width 2m = 2

Total width of windrow = (3 * 3) + (2 * 2)

= 13 m

Number of clearances between windrows = 4

Width of clearance area = (4 * 3)

= 12 m

End Spacing = (3 * 2)

= 6 m.

Total Width of the windrow = (13 + 12 + 6)

= 31 m

*Total Width of windrow is 31 m.

Windrow Size

Length = 4 m

Width = 3 m

Height = 1.5 m

*Required Platform Size = 31 m * 34 m

Total area required for Aerobic Composting Pad = 1,054 m2 (0.26 Acres)

5.6.2.2 Covered Processing Shed

Existing processing shed will be utilizing. The size of the existing shed is 17

m x 7.71 m

5.6.2.3 Reception cum Monsoon Shed

To support the segregation of the recyclable materials and taking care in

the Electro mechanical equipment breakdown and monsoon period, it is

proposed to have a reception cum Monsoon Shed of dimension 31 m x

18.38 m. It would be a masonry construction with roof. Pad of size 6.25 m x

18.38 m is to be constructed and truss is to be provided for whole size. The

details of estimates for the Reception cum Monsoon Shed Pad and Cover is

given in Reference IMSW 11 and IMSW 12 and drawing SMS/HKR/04.

5.6.2.4 Drains along the roads

A drain is provided on both side of the road. The total length required is 157 m.

Drain length of about for 157 m will be developed in next phase of



development. The details of estimates are given in Reference IMSW 04 and

drawing SMS/HKR/03.

5.6.2.5 Equipment

At Present, there are no equipments in the SWM Site. The processing

equipment required to process the composted waste is Dual trammel of

16/4mm with Feeding conveyor, Process conveyor and reject conveyor.

Proposed and given in Table 22 & the details of estimates in Reference

IMSW 10 and drawing SMS/HKR/08.

Table 22: Details of equipment in processing line

Sl. No. Items Dimension

1 M1 & M2 – Feeding and Process Conveyor

for 16 mm & 4 mm Dual- Trommel 8 m3/hr

2 S1 - Dual Trommel 16mm/4 mm 6 mtr x Dia 1.8 mtr and

1.4 mtr

3 R1 - Reject Conveyor (+ 16mm rejects) 1,500 mm

4 R2 - Reject Conveyor (+ 4mm rejects) 1,500 mm

5 Vertical Bailer 2 Tonnes /Hour



6. PART E: LANDFILL

6.1 Approach to Landfill design

A Sanitary landfill is proposed for the site. The site would be formed and excavated to

about 2 m to receive the liner. On top of the liner a landfill is built progressively up till the

final design height is reached. After reaching the design height the landfill is capped with

a top cover and the place is converted into a park.

6.2 Land profile

The area is longer in the North-South direction than in the east west direction. The Width

of the land in the Southern edge is higher than that in the Northern edge. The land is

sloping from West to East with the highest level being +100.40 in the East edge and the

lowest level is +99.00 on the East edge.

6.3 Volume of waste to be land filled

The volume of waste to be filled in the landfill has estimated 1,622 m3 and 10% of the soil

cover 162 m3 and considered 25% safety factor 1,800 m2 is required for proposed height

of 8 meter from the base-liner.

The projected volume of the waste handling in landfill facility is given in the Table 23:

Table 23: Projected Waste Handling over Design Life for Landfill

MSW TPD

Landfill Qty %

Qty Bulk

Density Volume/Day

Growth %

MSW / Annum Height

Reject Bulk

Density Tonnes Cu M

7 20.00 1.6 0.60 3 5% 2,920 4,867 8 0.85

Total MSW / Annum Total MSW / Annum Reject

Qty

Reject

Volume

Total

Area CUM

Year Tonnes Cu M Tonnes Cu M

1 2,555 4,258 2,555 4,258 511 601 75 75

2 2,683 4,471 5,238 8,730 537 631 79 154

3 2,817 4,695 8,055 13,424 563 663 83 237

4 2,958 4,930 11,012 18,354 592 696 87 324

5 3,106 5,176 14,118 23,530 621 731 91 415

6 3,261 5,435 17,379 28,965 652 767 96 511

7 3,424 5,707 20,803 34,671 685 806 101 612

8 3,595 5,992 24,398 40,663 719 846 106 718

9 3,775 6,291 28,173 46,955 755 888 111 829

10 3,964 6,606 32,137 53,561 793 933 117 945

11 4,162 6,936 36,298 60,497 832 979 122 1,068

12 4,370 7,283 40,668 67,780 874 1,028 129 1,196

13 4,588 7,647 45,257 75,428 918 1,080 135 1,331



Total MSW / Annum Total MSW / Annum Reject

Qty

Reject

Volume

Total

Area CUM

Year Tonnes Cu M Tonnes Cu M

14 4,818 8,030 50,075 83,458 964 1,134 142 1,473

15 5,059 8,431 55,133 91,889 1012 1,190 149 1,622 Soil Covering 10 % on total Volume

162

Total Area including 25% extra as safety factor Sq.m 1,800

6.4 Landfill Layout

The land have natural slope of 2m and would be excavated by about 1 m to level the

ground and place the landfill liner. 2 m high bund with top width of 1.5 m having 1 in 1.5

slopes is constructed. On the outer edge of this bund a drain is built to receive runoff from

the landfill surface. This drain can be built along with construction of the final cover of the

landfill. The landfill level on the Southern western side is higher. The landform would be

initiated from the eastern side, which is at about 100.20 RL. The landform would be built

up to a height of 106.00 RL on a 1 in 1.5 slope; the total height of the form would be 6 m

from ground level of 100.00. The final landfill layout is given in drawing number

SMS/HKR/06. The leachate Collection Tank is proposed at the RL 99.20 at the lowest part

of the landfill area.

6.4.1 Volume of the Landfill, landfill capacity and life

The volume of the landfill is estimated using the final landfill contour map is

estimated at 1,800 m2. The Landfill area estimation is considered for a period of

5 year in phase I, only for an area of 600 m2. There is no sufficient area available

at site for the proposal of landfill for 20 years. Hence, the life of the landfill is

estimated to be 15 years. The height of the landfill is considered 8 m from the

Base.

6.4.2 Liner

Base Liner

The base liner consists of 4 layers. The bottom layer is of 900 mm compacted

soils with 10% of Bentonite soli. This followed by a Geo Synthetic Liner (GCL)

and 1.5 mm HDPE liner. A protective layer of either 150 mm sand or a geo-

textile membrane overlies the HDPE liner. A drainage layer of stone metal of

300 mm depth follows this. 200 mm feeder and 250 mm main for leachate

collection HDPE perforated piping is placed in the drainage layer. The details of

liner are given in drawing number SMS/HKR/07.

Cover Liner System

The cover liner consists of 4 layers. The bottom layer is of 600 mm compacted

soils. This followed by a Geo Synthetic Liner (GCL) and 1.5 mm HDPE liner. A

protective layer of 150 mm sand or a geo-textile membrane overlies the HDPE

liner. The final layer is 450 mm top soil layer cover. A final vegetation cover is

provided at the top of the landfill.



6.4.3 Landfill Phasing

The landform would be undertaken progressively from the South-East initially

moving along the east west direction till the end of the landfill is reached. The

phasing of the landfill would be undertaken to minimize the upfront

development of the liner. It is proposed that the development of liner be

undertaken in 3 phases. The first development of 600 sq.m is taken upfront.

The second development would be undertaken after 5 years. The complete

details of estimation for 5 years are given in the reference IMSW16.

The landfill operation involves the following steps.

The waste from the processing yard is transported to the landfill area and

tipped. The tipped wastes are spread into 25 m strips. The strip is of 2 m

height. In the initial strip a ramp to reach the height is made using the waste.

The side of the strip is maintained at a slope of 1 in 1. These strips are built up

along the length. At the end of the day the strips are covered with soil of 150

mm depth on all exposed sides.

The waste is filled along the strip till the entire length is covered. Once the

entire length is covered the next strip is initiated. Once 3 strips are completed

the waste height is raised in the first strip by another 2 m. This process of

moving laterally and vertically is continued till the design height is reached.

Once the design height is reached the waste is closed on top with a top liner and

gas vents.

6.4.4 Leachate treatment (Solar Evaporation)

The term “leachate “refers to liquids that migrate from the waste carrying

dissolved or suspended contaminants. Leachate results from precipitation

entering the landfill and from moisture that exists in the waste when it is

disposed. Contaminants in the buried refuse may result from the disposal of

industrial waste, ash, waste treatment sludge, household hazardous wastes, or

from normal waste decomposition. If uncontrolled, landfill leachate can be

responsible for contaminating ground water and surface water.

The composition of leachate varies greatly from site to site, and can vary within

a particular site. Some of the factors affecting composition include:

Age of landfill

Types of waste

Degree of decomposition that has taken place; and

Physical modification of the waste (e.g. shredding).

Once ground water is contaminated, it is very costly to clean up. Today’s

landfills, therefore, undergo rigorous siting, design, and construction

procedures that provide many safeguards for the control of leachate migration.



This method reduces the leachate volume, producing water vapor and a

leachate concentrate that can be recycled to the landfill. Landfill gas, waste heat,

or natural gas can be used as fuel sources. Evaporation is energy intensive, but

can be cost-competitive if a site lacks economical access to more cost effective

alternatives. A common practice in the leachate pond is to use floating aerators.

This helps provide some treatment and reduce odours by keeping the ponds

from becoming anaerobic, and may increase evaporation for volume reduction.

The amount of yearly evaporation will depend on temperature, precipitation

and humidity. Sludge from the bottom of the pond may need to be removed

periodically and deposited within the landfill cell or other approved location.

In areas of the country where annual evaporation exceeds annual precipitation,

the evaporation of leachate in lined, open ponds can provide an inexpensive

method of leachate disposal. It also provides additional leachate storage

capabilities for other leachate disposal options. Leachate evaporation ponds

should be lined with a composite liner with an extra geomembrane to provide

UV and general physical protection to the primary liner system. Active aeration

can also be employed to increase the rate of leachate evaporation and introduce

oxygen into the leachate, helping to control odors.

Calculation for Leachate Treatment Plant

Area of Landfill: 1,000 Sq m

Table 24: Leachate Calculation

Month Average

Rainfall in mm

Infiltration in mm

Volume in Cum

Leachate Volume (Wet Weather)

in Cum

Total Leachate in Cum/ Month

Jan 1.00 0.6 1 5 5

Feb 2.20 1.32 1 10 12

Mar 17.10 10.26 10 2 12

April 48.80 29.28 29 5 34

May 61.70 37.02 37 6 43

Jun 83.00 49.8 50 9 58

Jul 79.90 79.9 80 8 88

Aug 89.40 53.64 54 9 63

Sep 96.60 57.96 58 10 68

Oct 111.20 66.72 67 11 78

Nov 38.00 22.8 23 4 27

Dec 6.90 4.14 4 1 5

635.80 494



Infiltration in mm = 60 % * Average Rainfall in mm

Volume in Cum = (Infiltration in mm * Area of Landfill) / 1000

Leachate volume for wet weather flow in Cum = (60 % * Average Rainfall in mm

* 7.945)

Total Leachate in Cum/Month = (Volume + Leachate volume for wet weather

flowing Cum)

Total Quantity of leachate generated per year = 494 Cum/ Month

Total Quantity of leachate generated per Month = 494 / 12

= 41 Cum/ Month

Total Quantity of leachate generated per Day = 41 / 30

= 1.4 Cum/ Month

Total Quantity of leachate generated for 15 days = 1.4 * 15

= 21 Cum/ 15 Days

Tank dimensions required for the leachate tank = 6 m * 4 m * 1 m

We have considered storage of leachate for 15 days only. The leachate collected can be

used for spraying on the waste for retaining moisture content of waste in windrows.

The leachate collected shall be used for spraying on the waste for retaining moisture

content of fresh waste (re-circulating).

The details of estimates are in Reference IMSW17 & Drawing No. SMS/HKR/012.

6.4.5 Storm Water Management

Storm Water Drain is provided on sides of the concrete yard. It is proposed to

have a road of 5 meter width and 341 meter length. The width of the Drain is

0.70 m and the depth considered for the construction of the Drain is 0.75 m. The

total required length for construction of the drain is 157 m. The details of

estimates are in Reference IMSW04. The rainwater runoff from the processing

facility is diverted in to the natural storm water drains for avoiding mixing with

the leachate. Rain water harvesting provision will be made in next phase.



7. PUBLIC AWARENESS THROUGH INFORMATION, EDUCATION

& COMMUNICATION AND CAPACITY BUILDING OF URBAN

LOCAL BODIES FOR SUSTAINABLE MSW MANAGEMENT 7.1 Introduction:

IEC & Public Awareness on waste management

is an extremely important component for any

successful Solid Waste Management

programme, in addition to ‘proper legislation,

technical support and funding. This has also

been a key strategy under the Swachh Bharath

Mission of Govt of India. This targets the

“Behavioural Change communication” to ensure

that waste management is mainstreamed with

the general public at large. It also covers issues

of proper management of municipal waste.

The focus of the program is on the households, commercial establishments, etc.

Sensitization of community towards efficient waste management and its related health

and environmental consequences is the key because a clean community is a direct

reflection of a clean city / town.

Goals of IEC Program

1. To raise the awareness among the people about importance of cleanliness, solid waste

management.

2. To motivate people positive behavioural changes.

3. To propose source segregation.

4. To promote principle of 3 R’s.

3 R’s:

One of the goals behind IEC is to make principle of 3 R’s as a part of life at every stage of

waste management. The 3-R’s (Reduce, Re-use and Recycle) have produced

demonstrative cost effective methods in handling of urban waste and also in conservation

of resources.

The solid waste management hierarchy has been globally recognized as per the following

illustrative diagram.

Enhancing Reuse & recycling and minimization of generation with source segregation are

essential to the success of any Solid waste management program. It hinges on voluntary

participation from the members of community (waste generators) and requires a robust

awareness program on a continual basis.



MSW has got a direct relationship with pollution of air, water, soil and sanitation, hence it

is extremely essential to impart a need based education and awareness to various levels

of society.

7.2 Identification and Orientation of Resident’s Welfare Committees:

Management of solid waste and its effectiveness is primarily dependent on the attitude,

co-operation and participation of the local community. People in all walks of their day-

today activities generate waste, which however, can be collected only once or maximum

twice in a day. The other critical aspect of waste management is the location of waste

management facilities such as dumper bins or the disposal site. There have been number

of cases where in the community has objected to the location of these facilities in their

neighbourhood. Popularly known as ‘Not in My Back Yard (NIMBY) Syndrome’, it is the

general perception of the public that location of any of these solid waste facilities will

create the problem of health and hygiene. In light of the above facts, it becomes

imperative that a successful implementation of any solid waste management system will

need effective cooperation and co-ordination of the local community in various aspects of

waste collection, transportation and disposal.

The steps involved in implementing and ensuring community participation will comprise

of the following activities;

Identification of Resident Welfare Associations (RWAs) whose members can

contribute expertise or resources and can share the responsibilities of planning

and implementing the program.

Identification and mobilisation of Non-Governmental Organisations or other social

welfare groups in the city

Identification of areas of SWM where community participation is elicited like

schools, institutions, offices, commercial areas, common community areas (parks),

etc.

Orient the citizens, key personalities, social activists, politicians and local

corporators towards environmental education and solid waste management

Conduct sanitation campaigns in various parts of the city emphasising on areas

where their co-operation / participation is sought

Carry out mass media campaigns on various aspects of solid waste management



It is also important to identify areas where the active involvement of community

participation is elicited and work out the modalities of the same. Some of the areas that

have emerged from experience elsewhere in the country, in which the community can

contribute to waste management, are,

Avoid indiscriminate throwing of waste by residents, shop keepers, etc on the

streets

Segregate and store the waste at source

Hand over the waste to the sanitary workers

Understanding the importance of dumper bins at various localities of the city and

their criticality in the efficient management of waste and therefore co-operating

while the shifting of dumper bins

Understanding the importance of Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Recovering of

various recyclables in the waste and their utility.

Once the above is explained to the representatives of RWA’s the same will be conveyed to

the community directly or through various means of technology, so that a sense of

community ‘ownership” is developed. People involved in planning and implementing a

project will feel that the program belongs to them. Community ownership helps to ensure

greater participation on collection day as well as community pride about the outcome of

the program.

7.3 Identification and Mobilization of NGOs Or Social Welfare Groups NGO

Involvement

The success of IEC is largely depending on the voluntary participation of the community

at large. The local government, the developer and Non-Government Organizations

(NGO’s) etc have a large role to play in this regard. In recent years it can be observed that

NGOs have taken up initiatives to work with local residents to improve sanitation. They

have been playing an active role in organizing surveys and studies in specified disciplines

of social and technological sciences. In the field of garbage management, such studies are

useful in identifying areas of commercial potentials to attract private entrepreneurs. They

can play an important role in segregation of waste, its collection and handling over to

local authorities.

Many NGOs are committed to improve SWM practices to protect the environment and

have been very active in this field, hence are successful in creating awareness among the

citizens about their rights and responsibilities towards solid waste and the cleanliness of

their city. These organizations promote environmental education and awareness in

schools and involve communities in the management of solid waste. They may be

persuaded to actively support the new strategies recommended in this report and

associate in public awareness campaigns. Any organization willing to perform

independently in conducting programs for sections of public on the new SWM strategies

should be encouraged to do so through direct support or through use of the corporation

resources / facilities.



7.4 Public participation and awareness through Information, Education and

Communication Plan

The basic approach of IEC plan is to create effectiveness of the Solid Waste Management

System. The success of any solid waste management scheme can be measured through

the extent of cooperation and participation of people, effectiveness of the proposed

system and operational efficiency.

7.5 Approach of IEC Plan

Attitudinal and behavioural changes of the residents are important for the success of the

segregated waste collection and its sustainability. For this purpose, communication with

the residents is required through various techniques and modes. There needs to be a two-

way approach for IEC Implementation:

a. Program Communication: (to bring about behavioural changes)

Behavioural changes are must to achieve the objective of receiving segregated waste

from each household. For this purpose, the strategy should be to build and improve

existing community awareness and education through adopting awareness initiatives

among the citizens.

b. Social Mobilization:(for alliance building )

It is universal that presence of local stakeholder or group in an issue can provide a

very effective mechanism for community outreach and associated information and

education activity. Hence support of NGOs, Local Leaders, RWAs, and Educational

Institutions etc are indispensable for social mobilization.



7.6 Strategy for Creating Awareness:

Selection of key target audience plays a key role in generating effective awareness and

cities like Agra need more careful planning for this purpose. Some of the target audience

can be from sectors of particular interest including the female head of the family, children

and youth, who require some form of role model to influence their behaviour. Broadly,

the target audience can be categorized as waste generators, waste collectors and waste

managers.

Once the target groups have been identified, the responsibility lies in developing the

approach for educating these groups. For successful implementation of any program

involving public at large, it is essential to spell out clearly and make them know the

manner in which the problem is proposed to be tackled to keep area clean and improve

the quality of life.

The communication material should be developed and must be utilized in public

awareness program through the tools of publicity. The use of various publicity tools will

be made as under:

1. Focus Group Discussions

2. Inter personal communications

3. Creating watchdog committees comprising of local influential people, RWA members

and important stakeholders, societies.

4. Printed materials and Audio-visual aids.

5. Other locally popular media.

Other tools like Newspapers, Media/Radio, Skit/ Street plays, Billboards/ Print Medium

may be used for creating awareness.



8. PART F. COST ESTIMATES

8.1 CIVIL COST ESTIMATES

The Civil work costs are given in the Table 25.

Table 25: Details of Civil Cost

SL. NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT IN LAKHS

1 Construction of Internal Roads 21.73

2 Providing Pipeline from Bore well to Aerobic Pad

0.21

3 Construction of Drain and Kerb 7.65

4 Construction of Nala 0.72

5 Construction of Deck slab 3.50

6 Construction of Monitoring Well 6.88

7 Dry Waste Collection Centre 6.15

8 Construction of Ramp 3.46

9 Lump sum provision for Landscape Green belt development

3.00

10 Pad for Reception Area 4.60

11 Truss for Reception Area 8.70

12 Aerobic composting Pad (without Cover) 35.70

13 Storage cum Recycling Shed 3.50

14 Truss for Storage cum Recycling Shed 2.74

15 Land fill Area 31.96

16 Leachate Tank (Aeration ) 7.10

Total 147.60

8.2 FINANCIAL MODEL

Table 26: Details of Financial Model

Sl. No.

GoI Share (in Lakhs) 35%

GoK Share (in Lakhs) 11.67%

Local ULB Share (in Lakhs) 53.33%

Total Project Cost (in Lakhs)

1 99.05 33.02 150.93 283.00

The financial model is given for ISWM project Hirekerur is given in Table No. 26. The

Govt. of India (GoI) will be funding an amount of Rs. 99.05 Lakhs (35% of the Total

Project Cost), Govt. of Karnataka (GoK) will be funding an amount of Rs. 33.02 Lakhs

(11.67% of the Total Project Cost) and the rest of the amount i.e., Rs. 150.93 Lakhs is to be

raised by Local ULB from own source, SFC and 14th Finance.



Hirekerur TP is not able to afford the above mentioned ULB’s share of Rs. 150.93 Lakhs,

requesting the state government (GoK) to approve 46.99% (Rs. 72.00 Lakhs) of ULB share

under Special grant, Swachh Bharat. The details of financial model under Special grant

from GoK under SBM are given in the Table 27.

Table 27: Details of Financial Model (Special SBM Grant)

Sl. No.

GoI Share (in Lakhs)

35%

GoK Share (in Lakhs)

11.67%

Local ULB Share

(in Lakhs)

28.27%

Special Grant from

GoK under SBM,

(in Lakhs) 25.06%

Total Project Cost (in Lakhs) 53.33%

1 99.05 33.02 80.00 70.93 283.00

8.3 MATERIAL BALANCE

Based the Waste Classification and Characterization study, the details of Material Balance

of municipal solid waste generated in Hirekerur, 8 TPD is given in Table No. 28.

Table 28: Material Balance Details for 8 TPD

Sl. No.

Material Out put

1 Compost 1.12

2 Sweeping Waste 0.80

3 RDF 1.44

4 Moisture loss 3.04

5 Recyclables 0.80

6 Inert to Landfill 0.80

Total 8.00

8.4 REVENUE

The Revenue we can expect from the compost for nurseries and farmers. Sale of Bale and

RDF (Refuse Derived Fuel) to the Recyclable vendors / Boiler industry /Cement

industries. The Revenue details are shown in Table 29.

Table 29: Details of Revenue Cost

Sl. No.

Description Qty per

day Monthly Annually

Cost per Ton in Rs.

Total Revenue/

Month

Total Revenue/Year

1 Sale of

Compost 1.12 28 336 2500 70,000 8,40,000

3 Sale of RDF 1.44 36 432 100 3,600 43,200

4 Recyclables 0.80 20 240 1500 30,000 3,60,000

1008 Total 1,03,600 12,43,200

Note: Considered 300 working days.



8.5 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST FOR COLLECTION AND

TRANSPORTATION

The minimum wages for labours as per the Notification No: KE/71/LWA/2015 dated:

04.08.2016 is considered for the calculation of Manpower Expenses. The proposed O & M

cost for Collection and transportation is shown in the below Table 30. The outsourcing

package details are enclosed as Annexure – 4.

Table 30: Total O & M cost for Collection and Transportation

Sl. No.

Description Cost / Month

(Rs)

Cost / Ton (Rs)

Cost / Year (Rs)

Primary Collection

cost per month

Street Sweeping cost per month

Secondary Collection

cost per month

1 Expenses-Manpower

6,66,325 2,776 79,95,900 3,23,219 1,98,900 1,44,206

2 Expenses-Fleet 62,153 259 7,45,832 23,231 11,631 27,291

3 Expenses-

Administrative 53,097 221 6,37,164 17,699 17,699 17,699

4 Expenses - Operations

18,007 75 2,16,080 6,002 6,002 6,002

Total 7,99,581 3,332 95,94,976 3,70,151 2,34,232 1,95,198

The proposed Manpower for Collection and transportation is shown in the below Table

31.

Table 31: Manpower proposed for Collection and Transportation

Sl. No. Description Manpower Proposed in No’s

1 Primary Collection 19 2 Street Sweeping 12

3 Dry Waste Collection Centre 01

4 Secondary Collection 09 Total 41

8.6 EQUIPMENTS COST FOR COLLECTION AND TRANSPORTATION

The proposed Equipments cost for Collection and transportation is shown in the below

Table 32.

Table 32: Equipment cost for Collection and Transportation

Sl. No. Particulars Qty Amount

1 Tata Ace CAB BSIV ESP with suitable hopper 2 10.71

2 Pushcarts 13 1.78

3 Wheeled bins 12 0.43

Total amount for Equipments 12.96



8.7 EQUIPMENTS COST FOR PROCESSING FACILITY

The proposed Equipments cost for Processing facility is shown in the below Table 33.

Table 33: Equipment cost for Processing Facility

Sl. No. Particulars Qty Amount

1 Back Hoe Loader 01 22.55

2

S1 - Trommel, MOC OF Screen 6 mm thick M.S.

Conforming to IS:2062, MOC Of shell 10 mm thick mild

steel conforming IS:2062, Supply of suitable electrical

motor, one coat primer and double coat of epoxy paint

01 20.60

3

M1 -Belt Conveyor 1500 mm Width, Nylon material,

Electrical Motor, 500 mm Impact Idler Spacing, 2000 mm

Return Idler Spacing

01 6.12

4

M2 -Belt Conveyor 1500 mm Width, Nylon material,



01 6.12

5

R1-Belt Conveyor 1500 mm Width, Nylon material,



01 5.06

6

R2-Belt Conveyor 1500 mm Width, Nylon material,



01 5.06

7 Chutes - IS 2062, 5 mm thick, suitable chutes 01 1.50

8

De- Stoner - stones /glass/ sand /pebbles to be

separated, Base Heavy structural steel, Blower-

centrifugal type, Dust collection system

01 6.86

9 Vertical Bailer 01 4.40

10 Transportation

7.00

11 Installation and commissioning

5.00

Total amount for Equipments 90.27

8.8 MANPOWER REQUIREMENT FOR COLLECTION & TRANSPORTATION AND

PROCESSING & DISPOSAL

The Manpower required for C&T and Processing & Disposal during execution of the

project is effectively tabulated in Table 34 below.

Table 34: Manpower Requirement

Sl. No. Manpower Required Quantity in No.

A. Collection and Transportation

1 Skilled (Drivers) 8

2 Semi Skilled/ Unskilled (Pourakarmikas) 33



Sl. No. Manpower Required Quantity in No.

Total (A) 41

B. Processing and Disposal

1 Landfill Supervisor 1

2 Vehicle Drivers 1

3 Helpers 4

4 Security Guards 1

Total (B) 7

Total (A+B) 48

8.9 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST FOR PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL

The overall cost Expenses incurring for processing of MSW as per the MSW 2000 Rules is

estimated Rs. 25,09,463/annum. The Operation and Maintenance cost details are shown

in Table 35.

Table 35: Operation and Maintenance Cost for Processing & Disposal

Sl. No.

Description Cost in Rs/

Month Cost Per

Ton in Rs. Cost in

Rs/Year

1 Manpower Expenses - General 17,201 72 2,06,415

2 Manpower Expenses - Support Staff 73,097 305 8,77,164

3 Manpower Expenses- Security 13,049 54 1,56,585

4 Packing Expenses 11,520 48 1,38,240

5 Raw material Consumable Expenses 8,408 35 1,00,896

6 General Expenses 4,507 19 54,083

7 Repairs to machinery 5,000 21 60,000

8 Repairs to vehicles 7,000 29 84,000

9 Repairs to Buildings 5,000 21 60,000

10 Fuel to vehicles 29,340 122 3,52,080

11 Oil & Lubricants 5,000 21 60,000

12 Electricity Charges 8,000 33 96,000

13 Office , Admin & Licensing charges 5,000 21 60,000

14 Landfill Expenses 15,000 63 1,80,000

15 Laboratory Analysis Charges 2,000 8 24,000

Total Cost 2,09,122 871 25,09,463

8.10 SUSTAINABLE OPERATION OF THE PLANT

Sustainable Operation of the plant, O & M cost is incurring Approx Rs. 2.09 Lakhs per

month and revenue generating from the by-products is Approx. Rs. 1.04 Lakhs per month.

The deficit of O & M cost is about Rs. 1.16 Lakhs per month.

Sustainable operation of the plant through selling of the compost and the recyclable

material, the revenue which is to be generated by the sale of RDF depends upon the



identification of the market (boilers & Cement Industries) at the time of sale. At present,

revenue generated from the sale of RDF is not taken into consideration. The total revenue

generated by the sale of Compost and Recyclable material is Rs. 1.04 Lakhs per month. In

a situation where there is no revenue generated from the sale of RDF, then the difference

in amount i.e. 2.09 Lakhs / Month is to be support by the TP as tipping fee.

8.11 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST FOR C&T AND PROCESSING & DISPOSAL

The overall cost Expenses incurring for C&T and processing of MSW as per the MSW 2000

Rules is estimated Rs. 1,21,47,687/annum. The Operation and Maintenance cost details

are shown in Table 36.

Table 36: Consolidated Operation and Maintenance Cost Details

Sl. No.

Description Cost /

Month (Rs) Cost / Ton

(Rs) Cost / Year

(Rs)

A Collection and Transportation 8,04,801 3353 96,57,616

B Processing and Disposal 2,09,122 871 25,09,463

Total (A+B) 10,13,923 4,224 1,21,67,079

The Proposed User Charges details for Hirekerur TP are tabulated in Table 37.

Table 37: Proposed User Charges Details

Sl. No

Solid waste management

tax/cess

User Fee Collection Efficiency

Considered

No. Of establishments

User Charge/ Establishments

(in Rs)

Total Amount (in

Lakhs)/Annum

1 Households

2 a) non slum 60% 4343 50.00 15.63

3 b) Slums 70%

4 small hotels 100% 36 100.00 0.43

5 Street vendors 100%

6 marriage halls 100% 6 200.00 0.14

7 lodge/ bigger hotel 100%

10 150.00 0.18

8 shops 100% 182 100.00 2.18

9 Bigger shops 100% 23 200.00 0.55

10 mutton shops 100% 5 200.00 0.12

11 fruit/veg shops 100% 3 200.00 0.07

12 cinema theatres 100% 1 250.00 0.03

13 hospitals 100% 15 250.00 0.45

14 Institutions 100% 51 250.00 1.53

Total 21.33



Table 38: Revenue proposed: FY 16-17 Sl. No

Description Amount in

Lakhs A O & M Expenses Proposed 121.67 i Revenue by sale of compost and by-products 12.43 ii Receipt of Salaries for outsourced staff from untied SFC grants

(75% of the Total Salary) 58.06

iii Receipt of salaries for Permanent staff 15.91 iiv Revenue by way of User Charges 21.33 B Total revenue proposed 107.73 Deficit (SWM) = Proposed total SWM O&M cost – Proposed total

revenue generated (SWM related cess) 13.94

Table 39: Revenue proposed (By sale of Compost, Recyclables & User Charges) Sl. No

Description Amount in

Lakhs A O & M Expenses Proposed 121.67 i Revenue by sale of compost and by-products 12.43 ii Revenue by way of User Charges 21.33 B Total revenue proposed 33.76 Deficit (SWM) = Proposed total SWM O&M cost – Proposed total

revenue generated (SWM related cess) 87.91

Table 40: Projection of O&M cost, Revenue by compost & by-products and Revenue by User Charges for 5 Years

Year O&M Cost Revenue by

Compost & By-products

Revenue by user charges

Total Revenue

Revenue Contribution to O&M cost

in (%)

2016-17 121.67 12.43 21.33 33.76 27.75

2017-18 127.75 14.30 24.53 38.82 30.39

2018-19 134.14 16.44 28.21 44.65 33.28

2019-20 140.85 18.91 32.44 51.35 36.45

2020-21 147.89 21.74 37.30 59.05 39.93

2021-22 155.29 25.01 42.90 67.91 43.73

9. BOQ

The BOQ is enclosed as Annexure - 1 in detail for your kind reference. All BOQs are

prepared as per the SR, 2015-16 Dharwad Circle with Area Weightage 8%.

10. DRAWINGS

The Drawings are enclosed as Annexure - 2 for your kind reference.

Consultant:-

Client

Notes:-

Tittle:-SURVEY MAP OF PROPOSED INTEGRATED

Levels, Gate, Water Tank

Boundary Line, Electric pole,TelephoneBench Mark, Bore well, Open Well

Area of Boundary =25980.68 SqmArea Details

Road, Drain, Compound wall

Tree , Coconut Tree, Test Pit

6.0 Acre 16.8 Guntas /279653.7 Sqft

HAVERI DISTRICT.BASHERAHALLI VILLAGE, HIREKERUR TALUK,

FACILITY AT BASHERAHALLI, HIREKERUR.

L

V

L

-

9

8

.1

6

SECURITY

CHAMBER

LEACHATE

P

IT

P

IT

E 4950

E 5000

E 5050

E 5100

N 3850

N 3900

N 3950

N 4000

N 4050

N 4100

N 4150

BORE WELL

< T

O

M

AIN

RO

AD

L

V

L

-

9

8

.9

5

P

IT

L

V

L

-

9

9

.1

0

E 4950

E 5000

E 5050

E 5100

E 5150

Gate

96.20m[315'-7"]

53.33m[175']

93.76m

[307'-8"]

62.58m

[205'-4"]

31.18m[102'-4"]16.47m [54'-1"]

71.66m[235'-1"]

94.3

1m[3

09'-5

"]

18.1

0m[5

9'-4"

]

200.

33m

[657

'-3"]

E

X

IS

T

IN

G

A

E

R

O

B

IC

P

A

D

MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANGEMENT

LEGEND

49.94m

[163'-10"]

SMS ENVOCARE LIMITED

HIREKERUR TP

TANK

1

0

0

.

0

0

Drawing No Revision

L

V

L

-

9

8

.1

6

SECURITY

CHAMBER

P

IT

P

IT

< T

O

M

AIN

RO

AD

L

V

L

-

9

8

.9

5

P

IT

L

V

L

-

9

9

.1

0

Gate

96.20m[315'-7"]

53.33m[175']

93.76m

[307'-8"]

62.58m

[205'-4"]

31.18m[102'-4"]16.47m [54'-1"]

71.66m [235'-1"]

94.3

1m[3

09'-5

"]

18.1

0m[5

9'-4"

]

200.

33m

[657

'-3"]

E

X

IS

T

IN

G

A

E

R

O

B

IC

P

A

D

1

8

.3

8

x

2

2

.0

m

Consultant:-

Client

Tittle:-CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT OF INTEGRATED

Area of Boundary =24960.82 SqmArea Details

6.0 Acre 16.8 Guntas /268676.00 Sqft

HAVERI DISTRICT.BASHERAHALLI VILLAGE, HIREKERUR TALUK,

FACILITY AT BASHERAHALLI, HIREKERUR. MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANGEMENT

L

A

N

D

F

I

L

L

1

8

0

0

S

q

m

t

PROPOSED EP

P

R

O

P

O

S

E

D

R

E

C

E

P

T

IO

N

A

R

E

A

C

U

M

M

O

N

S

O

O

N

S

H

E

D

1

8

.3

8

x

3

1

.0

m

RAMP

HIREKERUR TP

PROPOSED WEIGHT BRIDGE8 X 4M

STORAGE CUM

RECYCLING

SHED-6.0 x 10.0m

4

8

.3

0

x

6

.0

m

4

8

.8

0

x

6

.0

m

2

9

.6

0

x

9

.0

m

7.0 X 6.72M

(P

R

O

P

O

S

E

D

R

E

C

E

P

T

IO

N

A

R

E

A

C

U

M

M

O

N

S

O

O

N

S

H

E

D

)

DE

CK

SLA

B

Drawing NO Revision

CO

NN

EC

TIN

G P

AD

LEACHATE TANK6.0 X 4.0M

5.2903

M15 FOR PCC

M20 FOR RCC

M20 FOR RCC

PRECAST KERB OF SIZE 300x125(75)

M15 FOR PCC

M20 FOR RCC

PRECAST KERB OF

SIZE 300x125(75)

M20 FOR RCC

WMM Layer (125 mm)

GSB Layer (150mm)

25 SDBC mm +40 mm B M

Sub Grade (300 mm)

Prepared By Checked By

Drawing NO Revision

Consultant:-

Location HIREKERUR TP

HAVERI DISTRICT.

BASHERAHALLI VILLAGE,

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF THE PROPOSED 5.0M TO 5.75M WIDE ROAD

HIREKERUR TALUK,

Client HIREKERUR TPHAVERI DISTRICT.HIREKERUR TALUK,

CROSS SECTION OF RECEPTION CUM MONSOON SHED

18.38

RECEPTION CUMMONSOON SHED 21.84 X 37.67M

5.1

0

5.2

00

.1

55

.1

0

5.1

0

6.02 6.02 6.04

SECTION A A

ELEVATION

PLAN OF RECEPTION CUM MONSOON SHED

AA

0.15

5.1

0

31

.0

0

5.1

0

WBM GRADE-1 (150 mm)

WBM GRADE-3 (150mm)

M 15 CONCRETE FOR PCC(150MM )

M20 CONCRETE FOR RCC (200mm)

0.1

5

1.30

0.3

5

5.0

0.80

0.5

0

Asbestos

Cement Sheet

M20 CONCRETE

FOR RCC(Column)

COLUMNS

18 x 0.30□thick

TRUSS

Rafter ISMC

50x100x5mm

RIDGE SHEET

M20 CONCRETE

FOR RCC(Column)

Asbestos

Cement Sheet

TRUSS

4.3

5

5.0

0


Drawing NO Revision

Consultant:-


HAVERI DISTRICT.

BASHERAHALLI VILLAGE, HIREKERUR TALUK,


31.00

3 2 2

43

34.00

28.00

DAY-1DAY-7

3M W

IDTH

TYPIC

AL FO

R A

LL

31.00

0.65

ELEVATION

WBM GRADE-1

(150 mm)WBM GRADE-3

(150mm)

M 15 CONCRETE FOR

PCC(150MM)

SECTION-B

M20 CONCRETE FOR

RCC (200mm)

WBM GRADE-1 (150 mm)

WBM GRADE-3 (150mm)

M 15 CONCRETE FOR PCC(150MM)

M20 CONCRETE FOR RCC (200mm)

SECTION A A SECTION-B

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

WEEK-1

WEEK-2

WEEK-3

WEEK-4

WEEK-5

WINDROW PLANNING IN AEROBIC COMPOSTING PAD Prepared By Checked By

Drawing NO Revision

Consultant:-


HAVERI DISTRICT.



44

44

44

3

DAY-6DAY-5

DAY-4DAY-3

DAY-2

LONGITUDINAL LANDFILL BASE

PLAN OF LANDFILL

24.80

2

4

.

4

2

4

.

5

9

2

7

.

3

0

2

2

.

0

1.50

3.01.503.0

2.0

5

6

°

3

.

6

1

2

4

.

9

8

2

3

.

9

9


Drawing NO Revision

Consultant:-


HAVERI DISTRICT.



LEACHATE DRAIN PIPE 200 DIA

Compacted Waste

CROSS SECTION OF CLOSURE LAND FILL

CROSS SECTION OF LINER SYSTEM FOR PROPOSED SITE

2.50

2.0

2.0

2.50

2.0

2.0

Sub soil

900mm Compacted Soil with 10%Bentonite clay

1.5 mm thk. HDPE liner

Gravel 300mm

Non-woven geotextile5mm GSM


Drawing NO Revision

Consultant:-


HAVERI DISTRICT.



0.9

8

0.7

9

0.5

7

1.28

6.63

1.04

0.27

4.78

1.17 0.86

2.59

2.131.63

3.46

0.44

0.13

1.1

9

5.67

2.55 1.11

3.2

6

5.4

6

1.00

0.6

8

1.9

4


Drawing NO Revision

Consultant:-


HAVERI DISTRICT.



PLAN OF DECK SLAB CULVERT

VEN

T

AA

B B

Section at A-A

Section at B-B

6.0

0.90.6

0.6

0.9

1.3

2.1

0.4

0.6

0.9

3.1

PARAPET WALL

ABUTMENT

0.3

0.2

0.9

2.1

0.9

0.2

5.2

1.5


Drawing NO Revision

Consultant:-


HAVERI DISTRICT.



WBM GRADE-1

(150 mm)

WBM GRADE-3 (150mm)

M 15 CONCRETE

FOR PCC(150MM)

M20 CONCRETE

FOR RCC (200mm)

9" BBM WALL

Asbestos

Cement Sheet

TRUSS

4.0

6.0

10.0

R S

60.0sqm

CROSS SECTION OF PROPOSED STORAGE CUM RECYLING SHED AREA

1.0

GRILL

STORAGE CUMRECYLING SHED


Drawing NO Revision

Consultant:-


HAVERI DISTRICT.



M 15 CONCRETE

FOR PCC(150MM)

GILLS

G L SHEET ROOF

3.0

9" BBM WALL

TRUSS

18" SSM WALL

4" PCC

FOUNDATION

15.00

7.0

0

R S AA

2.75

1.15


Drawing NO Revision

Consultant:-


HAVERI DISTRICT.



6.0

4.0

0

1.0

M10 for PCC

M20 RCC

PLAN OF LEACHATE TANK

SECTION AT A-AELEVATION

CROSS SECTION OF LEACHATE TANK FOR AEROBIC PAD & LANDFILL

N

S

W E

0.5

0

0.2

3


Drawing NO Revision

Consultant:-


HAVERI DISTRICT.



10.80

3.6

2

2.0

0

2.3

0

3.60

4.99

2.5

9

0.6

0

M20 RCC

M20 CONCRETE

M15 PCC

FOUNDATION (1.60)

EARTH FILLING

PLAN OF RAMP

ELEVATION

SECTION A A

A A

CROSS SECTION OF UNLOADING RAMP


Drawing NO Revision

Consultant:-


HAVERI DISTRICT.



Documents

May 2017 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR INTEGRATED SOLID ... · detailed project report for integrated solid waste management for hirekerur town solid waste management total estimated