18
Ecological Assessment and Management Plan for the Humacao Wildlife Refuge, Puerto Rico Matthew J. Gray and Francisco J. Vilella Mississippi Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Project FW-10 Geographic Location of Humacao Wildlife Refuge Puerto Rico San Juan Humacao Miami, FL San Juan, PR 1000 miles N Creation of Humacao Wildlife Refuge Caribbean Sea Route #925 Route #3 Caribbean Sea Caribbean Sea Port Pre-Hurricane Post-Hurricane August 1979 Sugar Cane Farming Coconut Palm Plantations

Matthew J. Gray and Francisco J. Vilella Project FW-10fwf.ag.utk.edu/mgray/fwf410/FWF410_Website_files/HWRPRES.pdfProject FW-10 Geographic Location of Humacao Wildlife Refuge Puerto

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Ecological Assessment and Management Planfor the Humacao Wildlife Refuge, Puerto Rico

    Matthew J. Gray and Francisco J. Vilella

    Mississippi Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research UnitProject FW-10

    Geographic Location ofHumacao Wildlife Refuge

    Puerto Rico

    San Juan

    HumacaoMiami, FL

    San Juan, PR

    1000 miles

    N

    Creation of Humacao Wildlife Refuge

    Caribbean Sea

    Route #925 Route #3

    Caribbean SeaCaribbean

    Sea

    Port

    Pre-Hurricane Post-Hurricane

    August 1979

    Sugar Cane Farming

    Coconut Palm Plantations

  • Effects of Hurricane David and Tropical Storm Frederick (Humacao Wildlife Refuge)

    Pre-Hurricane Post-Hurricane

    Acquisition and Boundaries of Humacao Wildlife Refuge

    Property Delineations

    Caribbean Sea Caribbean

    Sea

    Management JurisdictionDNER

    PR LandAuthority

    PR LandAdminstration DNER

    1100 ha

    Conservation Trust

    Habitat Types atHumacao Wildlife Refuge

    Estuarine LagoonsBeach Scrub Coastal Forest

    Herbaceous Wetlands

    Forested Wetlands

    Mangrove Pterocarpus

  • DNER Objectives and Research at Humacao Wildlife Refuge

    Designated as a Natural Reserve in 1984 (Waterfowl Management Emphasis)

    CurrentInitial

    Preservation

    Descriptive Research

    Applied Wetland Management

    Quantitative Research

    Mississippi Cooperative Fish andWildlife Research Unit Objectives

    1. Quantify current abiotic and biotic conditions atHumacao Wildlife Refuge

    2. Develop a management plan to maximizewetland productivity and waterbird use.

    3. Train local biologists in wetland management.

    Ecological Assessment

    Wetland Management Plan

    2 Training Workshops

    Ecological Assessment

  • Habitat Categories Investigated during Ecological Assessment

    Aquatic Herbaceous Forested Mandri 1 Mandri Beach Scrub Mandri 2 Santa Teresa Coastal Forest Mandri 3 MangroveSanta Teresa 1 PterocarpusSanta Teresa 2 Palmas

    Parameters Measured in Aquatic Habitats

    Water:

    Communities:

    Dissolved oxygen, salinity, transparency,temperature, and depth.

    Abundance and diversity of Fish and Birds.

    Water Sampling

    10 Random Locations/Lagoon/MonthChemistry: ! Pre-sunrise (0400-0700 hrs)

    ! Surface and Bottom Sampled/Location

    ! Mid-afternoon (1400-1700 hrs) on Cloudless Days! Water Depth Measured Concurrently

    Transparency:

    Secchi Disk

    YSIMeters

  • Fish Sampling1 Fixed Location/Lagoon/Month

    ! Sampling Time (0800 & 1000 hrs) ! Set Time = 1 Hour! Capture Fish Identified, Measured, Weighed! Dead Fish Donated to Local Fisherman

    80-m Graduated Gill Net

    DNER Personnel

    Bird Sampling

    Vegetation/WaterInterface

    Edge Zone

    (2 m Width)

    Open-WaterZone

    InteriorZone

    Direction ofKayak Travel

    150-m

    Variable-Distance Segmented Line Transects! Line = Vegetation/Water Edge ! Segment = 150-m Distance along Line! Replication = Segments Sampled Alternately/Month (n > 6/lagoon)! Species and Approximate Perpendicular Distance Recorded! Micro-habitat Categories (Edge, Open Water, Interior Wetland)

    Parameters Measured in Herbaceous Habitats

    Vegetation:

    Communities:

    Plant height and diversity, seed yield, litterdepth, and percent composition of grasses,forbs, vines, litter, and bareground.

    Abundance and diversity of Insects, Birds,and Rodents.

  • Sampling in Herbaceous Habitats

    Vegetation 1-m2 Randomly Located Plots

    Insects 9-in2 Flourescent Pans Systematically Placed

    VertebratesVictor® Rat & Mouse Traps Systematically Placed 35 Trap Nights

    Bird Sampling in Herbaceous and Forested Habitats

    10-25 m 25-50 m >50 m50m

    Parameters Measured in Forested Habitats

    Vegetation:

    Communities:

    Plant density, diversity, and height, DBH, percentcomposition of grasses, forbs, vines, woody stems,litter, and bareground, and visual obscurity, andpercent canopy cover.

    Abundance and diversity of Insects, Birds,and Terrestrial Vertebrates.

    1-m2 10-m2 100-m2

  • Sampling Stations in Terrestrial Habitats

    Caribbean Sea

    Caribbean Sea

    84o

    Purple = Beach Scrub Brown = Pterocarpus

    Gray = Coastal Forest Red = Mangrove

    Vegetation Measuring in Forested Sites

    ClinometerDensiometer

    DBH Tape

    Modified Nudds (1977) Board

    Ancillary Sampling

    ! Night (2000 - 0200 hrs) and Morning (0600 - 0800 hrs) ! Turtle Visits (i.e., tracks) Recorded! Encountered Turtles were Tagged, Morphological

    Measurements Taken, and Clutch Size Recorded

    Sea Turtle Patrols:

    ! Weekly Searches in Kayaks ! Confined to Nesting Platforms and

    Vegetation/Water Edge ! Clutch Size and Species Recorded

    Waterfowl Nest Searches:

    ! Precipitation Receptacle! Measured Daily at 0700 hours

    Rainfall:

  • Statistical Analysis

    Vegetation, Water, and Animal Community Data:

    Percent Coverage of Vegetative Life Forms:

    Capture Frequency of Vertebrates:

    A) ParametricRepeated measures, Multivariate, and Univariate ANOVA’s, 2-Sampleand Paired t-tests, and Least-squares means multiple comparison test

    B) Non-parametricKruskal-wallis, Cox-Cochron, and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests

    216 Analyses Conducted

    Logit Categorical Data Analysis

    Compositional Data Analysis Xi = ln%i

    (%1 * %2 * . . . * %D)1D

    lnJ0*ij

    J1*ij= " + $i B + $i T

    Generalized Results in Aquatic Habitats

    Water! Salinity and Depth were GREATEST in

    Mandri 1 and LEAST in Santa Teresa 2Distance from Sea

    ! Transparency typically GREATER in SantaTeresa than in Mandri lagoons.

    Turbidity and Phytoplankton

    ! Dissolved Oxygen was GREATEST in Mandrilagoons during April, but Oxygen in Mandriwas SIMILAR or LOWER than Santa Teresalagoons during June.

    Rainfall, Phytoplankton, and Temperature

    Generalized Results in Aquatic Habitats

    Birds and Fish! Bird Abundance and Diversity were GREATEST in Mandri 1

    Landscape Heterogeneity! Bird Abundance in Edge and Interior Zones was GREATEST

    in Mandri 1.

    Micro-habitat Characteristics and Diversity

    ! GREATEST Abundance of Brown Pelicans was in Mandri 3

    Fish Diversity and Water Depth

    ! Bird Abundance in the Open Water Zone was GREATEST inMandri 2.

    Fish Abundance and Poor Adjacent Habitat

  • Generalized Results in Herbaceous Habitats

    ! Insect Abundance was GREATEST in Mandri wetlandsMean plant diversity and height, percentlitter and depth were Greater in Mandri

    ! Seed yield was GREATER in Santa Teresa than inMandri wetlands

    Occurrence of Paspalum vaginatum wasgreater in Santa Teresa than in Mandri

    Typically, NO Differences (P > 0.05) Detected

    Duck-use-days Calculations

    Mandri 292 kcalday2500kcal kg

    150 kgha138 ha 178K

    Santa Teresa 73 ha 600

    kgha

    2500kcal kg 292kcalday 377K

    SeedYieldWetland Area MTE DER DUD

    ½ MillionDuck-use-Days

    6 Months

    Oct -March

    3083Ducks/Day

    Generalized Results in Forested Areas

    ! Bird Abundance and Diversity and Vertebrate Species Richnesswere GREATEST in Mangrove

    Landscape Heterogeneity, Ecotones,and Micro-habitat Complexity

    ! Insect Species Diversity was GREATEST in Pterocarpus

    Forest-Age Hypothesis, Resource Partitioning,Niche Diversification

    ! Vertebrate and Insect Abundance was GREATEST inCoastal Forest

    Forest-Age Hypothesis, Generalists, HighReproductive Rates Years10 20 40 60 80 100 120

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    Foilage Height Diversity0.1 0.3 0.5 0.75 0.9 1 1.1

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

  • Management Implications

    Preservation of Mangrove and Pterocarpus Forests

    Preservation of Regenerating Coastal Forest andBeach Scrub (Selectively Cut Coconut Palms)

    Management Techniques (e.g., water levelmanipulations, disking, burning) in HerbaceousWetlands

    A) Mandri 2 (Wintering Waterfowl)B) Santa Teresa 1 (Breeding Waterfowl)

    Research Needs

    Limonological and Fish Population Dynamics

    Pterocarpus Restoration and Community Dynamics

    Evaluatory Research in Concert with Management Practices

    Management Plan

  • Management Plan Goals

    Explain Breeding and Wintering Waterfowl Management

    Identify Limiting Factors toManagement and Propose Methods to Alleviate Shortcomings

    Identify Costs for Implementation

    Propose Time Schedule for Implementation

    Biological Knowledge

    Breeding Waterfowl Management (West Indian Whistling Duck, White-cheeked Pintail, Ruddy Duck, Caribbean Coot)

    Time: March through August

    Events: Nesting, Egg Laying, Brood Rearing, Pre-basic Molt

    Physiological Demand: Protein

    Management: Hemi-marsh

    Breeding Waterfowl Management

    Natural Marsh Cycle (Dry, Regenerating, Degenerating, Lake)

    8 Year Cycle (Random and Unpredictable)

    Emulate via Hydrologic and Vegetative Manipulations

    Hemi-Marsh

    MarshCycle

    50:50

  • Biological KnowledgeMigrating/Winter Waterfowl Management

    (Blue-winged Teal, American Wigeon, Lesser Scaup)

    Time: September through February

    Events: Migration, Pre-Alternate Molt, Courtship

    Physiological Needs: Carbohydrates

    Management: Moist-soil and Flooded Agricultural Fields

    Moist-soil Management

    Wetlands Dominated with Early Successional Plants

    Natural Hydrology is Often Altered

    Emulate via Annual Spring Drawdowns and Summer/Autumn Vegetation Manipulations

    Maximize Wetland Productivity and Use

    Assessing CurrentManagement Infrastructure

    Water Control Capabilities(Levees and Water Control Structures)

    Management Equipment(Tractors, Disks, Rotary Mowers, Pumps)

    Work Load and Skill Level of Staff

    Headquarters and Public Use

  • Identifying Inhibiting Factors to Management

    Biological/Physical Factors Hydrology Uncontrolled Grazing Uncontrolled Burning Dumping

    Socio-economic Factors Office and Storage Facilities Too Small Need Additional Management Equipment Biologist Has Too Many ObligationsBiologist Lacks Wetland Management Skills Research Commitments Public and DNER Interaction is Limited

    Suggested Alterations to Infrastructure

    Wildlife Management(Excavation, Equipment Purchasing, Personnel Training)

    Public Relations(Grazing Contract, Visitor Center, Informational Brochures, Educational Signs)

    Regulation of Potentially Hazardous Activities (Controlled Burning and Restricted Dumping)

    DNER Public

    Wetland Regulations and Permits

    Clean Water Act of 1977: Section 404

    Regulates Dredging and Filling of Wetlands

    Permits Issued by Army Corps of Engineers

    Environmental Impact Statement and/or Mitigation may be Required

  • Waterfowl Management Zones

    Moist-soil Mangement

    Hemi-marsh

    Hemi-marsh

    Upland Nesting

    Mandri (Winter)

    Santa Teresa (Breeding)

    Engineering and Design

    24 m

    10.5 m

    3 m

    3 m

    ! Topographic Survey! Levee Design and Survey! Water Control Structure Design! Pump Station Design

    Dennis L. McDonough, R.P.E.

    Infrastructure Modifications

    LegendContour

    Existing

    Excavated

    Electricity

    PumpWaterControlStructure

    Mandri 1

    SantaTeresa 1

    SantaTeresa

    2

  • Equipment to be Purchased

    ! Permanent and Portable Pump ! Inline Water Control Structures ! 120 hp Tractor ! Malsam Terrace Machine ! Backhoe Loader! 4 x 4 Truck! Agricultural Disk ! Rotary Mower! Seed Spreader! Drip Torches

    Personnel TrainingWorkshops:

    Literature:

    Consulting:

    ! Waterfowl Ecology and Wetland Systematics (April 1996)< University of Puerto Rico-Humacao< Drs. Guy A. Baldassarre and Richard M. Kaminski

    ! Wetland Management (December 1996)< Mississippi and Louisiana< MSU, Noxubee NWR, Delta NF, Rockefeller Refuge

    ! Limnological Processes (December 1997)

    ! Prescribed Burning (April 1998)

    ! Classic Waterfowl Ecology and Wetland Management Texts< Bellrose 1976, Weller 1988, Batt et al. 1992 < Mitch and Grosselink 1986, Smith et al. 1989, Baldassarre and

    Bolen 1994

    ! MS Coop Unit, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, DucksUnlimited, Inc.

    Implementation Schedule and Costs

    Fiscal Year 1997-98: $240,000! Topographic survey! Design and excavate contour levees! Design Electric Pump Station! Purchase 5 water control structures and a portable cristae-folie

    pump! Purchase 120-hp tractor, Malsam terrace machine, offset disk,

    and rotary mower! Purchase materials for controlled grazing project

    ! Purchase wetland publications ! Limnological workshop sponsored by Coop Unit in PR! Refuge manager attend burning short course

    ! Purchase and erect approximately 100 refuge boundary signs

    WildlifeManagement

    PersonnelTraining

    PublicRelations

  • Implementation Schedule and Costs

    Fiscal Year 1998-99: $140,000

    ! Purchase 1 water control structure for Mandri 3 arm! Design and build levee near Mandri 3! Install electricity ! Purchase and construct pump station! Design levee between levee between Mandri 1 and 2

    WildlifeManagement

    PublicRelations ! Purchase and erect educational signs for ongoingmanagement and excavation projects

    Implementation Schedule and Costs

    Fiscal Year 1999-2000: $200,000! Purchase 3 water control structures! Excavate levee between Mandri 1 and 2! Drain Mandri 2 after construction! Design and excavate additional contour levees in

    Mandri 2! Design levees for Santa Teresa 1 and 2! Purchase front-loader backhoe ! Purchase tractor-mounted seed spreader

    WildlifeManagement

    PublicRelations

    ! Design visitor center and additional storage facilities! Purchase and erect educational signs for ongoing

    management and excavation projects

    Implementation Schedule and Costs

    Fiscal Year 2000-01: $230,000! Purchase 2 water control structures! Excavate levees in Santa Teresa 1 and 2! Begin wetland management experiments in Mandri

    unit ! Purchase drip torches

    WildlifeManagement

    PublicRelations

    ! Construct visitor center and additional storagefacilities

    ! Purchase and erect educational signs for ongoingmanagement and research projects

    ! Begin a human dimensions study of refuge users

  • Effects of Moist-soil Management onWintering Waterfowl at Humacao Wildlife Refuge

    ExistingMandriMoist-soil

    292 kcalday2500kcal kg

    450 kgha138 ha 535K

    Mandri 2 100 ha 450 kgha2500kcal kg 292

    kcalday 385K

    SeedYieldWetland Area MTE DER DUD

    ½ MillionDuck-use-Days 6 Months

    Oct -March 3083Ducks/Day

    1 MillionDuck-use-Days

    5105Ducks/Day

    Effects of Hemi-marsh Management on Breeding Waterfowl

    = ?No Carrying Capacity Equations

    Research

    Current150 Females

    Speculated Future 2x to 3x Nesting Density

    Holistic Effects of Management at Humacao Wildlife Refuge

    Number of Waterbirds Success Rate

    Number of Visitors Attitudes Money toCommunity and DNER

    Number of Fish

  • Acknowledgments

    DNER USFWS UPR MSUM. Corbet

    J. DiazA. Mojica

    R. PimentelJ. ReyesI. Rosa

    R. MatosJ. ChabertJ. Berrios

    J. OlandF. Lopez

    S. SilanderB.Yoshioka

    C. Diaz

    C. BaergaE. Hernandez

    R. Perez

    R. KaminskiJ. Hargreaves

    J. BowmanJ. B. DavisR. Minnis

    J. D. TaylorR. Brown

    J. MacGownS. McDaniel

    G. Baldassarre

    SUNY

    DUR. Melinchuk

    VolunteersN. Ayala, D. Castillo, J. Cruz, Y. Cruz, E. Esquilin, U. Feliciano, M. Lopez, N.Lopez, R. Lopez, A. Martinez, J. Martinez, D. Miller, N. Perez, A. Puente, I.Ramon, F. Rios, M. Rivera, O. Rivera, H. Torres, W. Velez, and J. Wade

    Funding and Support

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

    Project FW-10

    Puerto Rico Department of Natural ResourcesDivision of Reserves and Refuges

    Mississippi State UniversityCooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit

    Department of Wildlife and Fisheries

    Preguntas?