Upload
fish-shuang
View
82
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Page 1Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
Chapter 8 Deformation and Strengthening Mechanisms
• Issues to address in this chapter:• Why are the number of dislocations present greatest in metals?• How are strength and dislocation motion related?• Why does heating alter strength and other properties?
Page 2
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Covalent Ceramics(Si, diamond): Motion difficult- directional (angular) bonding
• Ionic Ceramics (NaCl):Motion difficult- need to avoid nearest
neighbors of like sign (- and +)
+ + + +
+++
+ + + +
- - -
----
- - -
• Metals (Cu, Al): Dislocation motion easiest- non-directional bonding- close-packed directions
for slip electron cloud ion cores
++
++
++++++++ + + + + +
+++++++
Dislocations & Materials Classes
Page 3
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
Dislocation motion & plastic deformation• Metals - plastic deformation occurs by slip – an edge dislocation
(extra half-plane of atoms) slides over adjacent plane half-planes of atoms.
• If dislocations can't move, plastic deformation doesn't occur! Adapted from Fig. 8.1, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
Dislocation Motion
Page 4
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• A dislocation moves along a slip plane in a slip direction perpendicular to the dislocation line
• The slip direction is the same as the Burgers vector direction
Edge dislocation
Screw dislocation
Adapted from Fig. 8.2, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
Dislocation Motion
Page 5
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
Slip System• Slip plane - plane on which easiest slippage occurs
» Highest planar densities (and large interplanar spacings) • Slip directions - directions of movement
» Highest linear densitiesAdapted from Fig. 8.6, Callister & Rethwisch3e.
– FCC Slip occurs on {111} planes (close-packed) in <110> directions (close-packed)
=> total of 12 slip systems in FCC– For BCC & HCP there are other slip systems.
Deformation Mechanisms
Page 6
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Resolved shear stress, tR– results from applied tensile stresses
slip planenormal, ns
Resolved shear stress: τR = Fs /A s
slipdirectio
n
AS
tR
tR
FS
slipdirectio
n
Relation between σ and τR
τR= FS /AS
Fcos λ A /cos φ
λF
FS
φnS
AS
A
Applied tensile stress: = F/Aσ
slipdirectio
n
FA
F
φλσ=τ coscosR
Stress and Dislocation Motion
Page 7
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Condition for dislocation motion: CRSS τ>τR• Ease of dislocation motion depends
on crystallographic orientation
10-4 GPa to 10-2 GPa
Typically
φλσ=τ coscosR
τ maximum at λ = φ = 45º
tR = 0λ=90°
σ
tR = σ/2λ=45°φ=45°
σ
tR = 0φ=90°
σ
Critical Resolved Shear Stress
Page 8
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
Adapted from Fig. 8.8, Callister& Rethwisch 3e.
Adapted from Fig. 8.9, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
Single Crystal Slip
Page 9
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho ChoiSo the applied stress of 6500 psi will not cause the crystal to yield.
MPa 20.7 cos cos
=σφλσ=τ
λ = 35°φ = 60°
τcrss = 20.7 MPa
a) Will the single crystal yield? b) If not, what stress is needed?
σ = 6500 psi
Adapted from Fig. 8.7, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
τ = (45 MPa) = (45 MPa) ( 0.41)τ = 18.5 MPa < τ crss =
(cos 35 o ) (cos 60 o )
20 .7 MPa
Ex: Deformation of single crystal
Page 10
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
psi 732541.0
psi 3000coscos
crss ==φλ
τ=σ∴ y
What stress is necessary (i.e., what is the yield stress, σy)?
)41.0(cos cos psi 3000crss yy σ=φλσ==τ
psi 7325=σ≥σ y
So for deformation to occur the applied stress must be greater than or equal to the yield stress
Ex: Deformation of single crystal
Page 11
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Stronger - grain boundaries pin deformations
• Slip planes & directions (l, f) change from one crystal to another.
• tR will vary from one crystal to another.
• The crystal with the largest tR yields first.
• Other (less favorably oriented) crystals yield later.
Adapted from Fig. 8.10, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.(Fig. 8.10 is courtesy of C. Brady, National Bureau of Standards [now the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD].)
σ
300 μm
Slip Motion in Polycrystals
Page 12
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Can be induced by rolling a polycrystalline metal - before rolling
235 mm- isotropicsince grains are approx. spherical & randomly oriented.
- after rolling
- anisotropicsince rolling affects grainorientation and shape.
rolling direction
Adapted from Fig. 8.11, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.(Fig. 8.11 is from W.G. Moffatt, G.W. Pearsall, and J. Wulff, The Structure and Properties of Materials, Vol. I, Structure, p. 140, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1964.)
Anisotropy in σy
Page 13
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
side view
1. Cylinder oftantalummachinedfrom arolled plate:
rollin
g dire
ction
2. Fire cylinderat a target.
• The noncircular end view showsanisotropic deformation of rolled material.
endview
3. Deformedcylinder
platethicknessdirection
Photos courtesyof G.T. Gray III,Los AlamosNational Labs. Used withpermission.
Anisotropy in Deformation
Page 14
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Grain boundaries arebarriers to slip.
• Barrier "strength"increases withIncreasing angle of misorientation.
• Smaller grain size:more barriers to slip.
• Hall-Petch Equation:21 /
yoyield dk −+σ=σ
Adapted from Fig. 8.14, Callister & Rethwisch 3e. (Fig. 8.14 is from A Textbook of Materials Technology, by Van Vlack, Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.)
4 Strategies for Strengthening Metals: 1: Reduce Grain Size
Page 15
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Impurity atoms distort the lattice & generate stress.• Stress can produce a barrier to dislocation motion.• Smaller substitutional
impurity
Impurity generates local stress at A and Bthat opposes dislocation motion to the right.
A
B
• Larger substitutionalimpurity
Impurity generates local stress at C and Dthat opposes dislocation motion to the right.
C
D
4 Strategies for Strengthening Metals: 2: Solid Solutions
Page 16
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
Adapted from Fig. 8.4, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
Stress Concentration at Dislocations
Page 17
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• small impurities tend to concentrate at dislocations• reduce mobility of dislocation ∴ increase strength
Adapted from Fig. 8.17, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
Strengthening by Alloying
Page 18
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• large impurities concentrate at dislocations on low density side
Adapted from Fig. 8.18, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
Strengthening by Alloying
Page 19
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Tensile strength & yield strength increase with wt% Ni.
• Empirical relation:
• Alloying increases σy and TS.
21 /y C~σ
Adapted from Fig. 8.16 (a) and (b), Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
Tens
ile st
reng
th (M
Pa)
wt.% Ni, (Concentration C)
200
300
400
0 10 20 30 40 50 Yield
stre
ngth
(MPa
)wt.%Ni, (Concentration C)
60
120
180
0 10 20 30 40 50
Ex: Solid Solution Strengthening in Copper
Page 20
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Hard precipitates are difficult to shear.Ex: Ceramics in metals (SiC in Iron or Aluminum).
• Result:S
~y1 σ
Large shear stress needed to move dislocation toward precipitate and shear it.
Dislocation “advances” but precipitates act as “pinning” sites with
S .spacing
Side View
precipitate
Top View
Slipped part of slip plane
Unslipped part of slip plane
S spacing
4 Strategies for Strengthening Metals: 3: Precipitation Strengthening
Page 21
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Internal wing structure on Boeing 767
• Aluminum is strengthened with precipitates formed by alloying.
Adapted from chapter-opening photograph, Chapter 11, Callister & Rethwisch 3e. (courtesy of G.H. Narayanan and A.G. Miller, Boeing Commercial Airplane Company.)
1.5mm
Adapted from chapter-opening photograph, Chapter 11, Callister & Rethwisch 3e. (courtesy of G.H. Narayanan and A.G. Miller, Boeing Commercial Airplane Company.)
Application: Precipitation Strengthening
Page 22
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Room temperature deformation.• Common forming operations change the cross sectional area:
Adapted from Fig. 14.2, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
-Forging
A o A d
force
dieblank
force-Drawing
tensile force
A oA ddie
die
-Extrusion
ram billet
container
containerforce die holder
die
A o
A dextrusion
100 x %o
doA
AACW −=
-Rolling
rollA o
A droll
4 Strategies for Strengthening Metals: 4: Cold Work (%CW)
Page 23
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Ti alloy after cold working:• Dislocations entangle
with one anotherduring cold work.
• Dislocation motionbecomes more difficult.
Adapted from Fig. 5.11, Callister & Rethwisch 3e. (Fig. 5.11 is courtesy of M.R. Plichta, Michigan Technological University.)
0.9 mm
Dislocations During Cold Work
Page 24
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Dislocation density =
• Carefully grown single crystal ca. 103 mm-2
• Deforming sample increases density 109-1010 mm-2
• Heat treatment reduces density 105-106 mm-2
• Yield stress increasesas rd increases:
total dislocation lengthunit volume
large hardeningsmall hardening
σ
ε
σy0σy1
Result of Cold Work
Page 25
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
Adapted from Fig. 8.5, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
Effects of Stress at Dislocations
Page 26
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
Adapted from Fig. 8.20, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
• Yield strength (σy) increases.• Tensile strength (TS) increases and Ductility (%EL or %AR) decreases.
• As cold work is increased
Impact of Cold Work
Page 27
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• What is the tensile strength & ductility after cold working?
Adapted from Fig. 8.19, Callister & Rethwisch 3e. (Fig. 8.19 is adapted from Metals Handbook: Properties and Selection: Iron and Steels, Vol. 1, 9th ed., B. Bardes (Ed.), American Society for Metals, 1978, p. 226; and Metals Handbook: Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Pure Metals, Vol. 2, 9th ed., H. Baker (Managing Ed.), American Society for Metals, 1979, p. 276 and 327.)
%6.35100 x % 2
22=
π
π−π=
o
dor
rrCW
% Cold Work
100
300
500
700
Cu
200 40 60
yield strength (MPa)
σy = 300MPa
300MPa
% Cold Work
tensile strength (MPa)
200Cu
0
400
600
800
20 40 60
ductility (%EL)
% Cold Work
20
40
60
20 40 6000
Cu
D o =15.2mm
Cold Work
Dd =12.2mm
Copper
340MPa
TS = 340MPa
7%
%EL = 7%
Cold Work Analysis
Page 28
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Results forpolycrystalline iron:
• σy and TS decrease with increasing test temperature.
• %EL increases with increasing test temperature.
• Why? Vacancieshelp dislocationsmove past obstacles.
Adapted from Fig. 7.14, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
2. vacancies replace atoms on the disl. half plane
3 . disl. glides past obstacle
-200°C
-100°C
25°C
800
600
400
200
0
Strain
Stre
ss (M
Pa)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
1. disl. trapped by obstacle
obstacle
σ-ε Behavior vs. Temperature
Page 29
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• 1 hour treatment at Tanneal: decreases TS and increases %EL.• Effects of cold work are reversed!
• 3 Annealing stages to discuss...
Adapted from Fig. 8.22, Callister & Rethwisch 3e. (Fig. 8.22 is adapted from G. Sachs and K.R. van Horn, Practical Metallurgy, Applied Metallurgy, and the Industrial Processing of Ferrous and Nonferrous Metals and Alloys, American Society for Metals, 1940, p. 139.)
tensil
e stre
ngth
(MPa
)
ducti
lity (%
EL)
tensile strength
ductility
RecoveryRecrystallization
Grain Growth
600
300
400
500
60
50
40
30
20
annealing temperature (ºC)200100 300 400 500 600 700
Effect of Heating After %CW
Page 30
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
Annihilation reduces dislocation density.• Scenario 1
Results from diffusion
• Scenario 2
4. opposite dislocations meet and annihilate
Dislocations annihilate and form a perfect atomic plane.
extra half-plane of atoms
extra half-plane of atoms
atoms diffuse to regions of tension
2 . grey atoms leave by vacancy diffusion allowing disl. to “climb”
tR
1. dislocation blocked; can’t move to the right
Obstacle dislocation
3 . “Climbed” disl. can now move on new slip plane
Recovery
Page 31
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• New grains are formed that:-- have a small dislocation density-- are small-- consume cold-worked grains.
Adapted from Fig. 8.21 (a),(b), Callister& Rethwisch 3e. (Fig. 8.21 (a),(b) are courtesy of J.E. Burke, General Electric Company.)
33% coldworkedbrass
New crystalsnucleate after3 sec. at 580°C.
0.6 mm 0.6 mm
Recrystallization
Page 32
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• All cold-worked grains are consumed.
Adapted from Fig. 8.21 (c),(d), Callister& Rethwisch 3e. (Fig. 8.21 (c),(d) are courtesy of J.E. Burke, General Electric Company.)
After 4seconds
After 8seconds
0.6 mm0.6 mm
Further Recrystallization
Page 33
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• At longer times, larger grains consume smaller ones. • Why? Grain boundary area (and therefore energy) is reduced.
After 8 s,580ºC
After 15 min,580ºC
0.6 mm 0.6 mmAdapted from Fig. 8.21 (d),(e), Callister& Rethwisch 3e. (Fig. 8.21 (d),(e) are courtesy of J.E. Burke, General Electric Company.)
• Empirical Relation:
Ktdd no
n =−elapsed time
coefficient dependenton material and T.
grain diam.at time t.
exponent typ. ~ 2
Ostwald Ripening
Grain Growth
Page 34
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
TR
Adapted from Fig. 8.22, Callister& Rethwisch 3e.
º
º
TR = recrystallizationtemperature
Effect of Heating
Page 35
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
TR = recrystallization temperature = point of highest rate of property change1. Tm => TR ≈ 0.3-0.6 Tm (K)2. Due to diffusion annealing time TR = f(time) shorter annealing time
=> higher TR3. Higher %CW => lower TR – strain hardening4. Pure metals lower TR due to dislocation movements
» Easier to move in pure metals => lower TR
Recrystallization Temperature, TR
Page 36
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
A cylindrical rod of brass originally 0.40 in (10.2 mm) in diameter is to be cold worked by drawing. The circular cross section will be maintained during deformation. A cold-worked tensile strength in excess of 55,000 psi (380 MPa) and a ductility of at least 15 %EL are desired. Further more, the final diameter must be 0.30 in (7.6 mm). Explain how this may be accomplished.
Coldwork Calculations
Page 37
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
If we directly draw to the final diameter what happens?
%CW =Ao − Af
Ao
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟ x 100 = 1−
Af
Ao
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟ x 100
= 1−πDf
2 4πDo
2 4
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟ x 100 = 1−
0.300.40
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
2⎛
⎝ ⎜ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟ ⎟ x 100 = 43.8%
Do = 0.40 in
BrassCold Work
Df = 0.30 in
Coldwork Calculations Solution
Page 38
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• For %CW = 43.8%– σy = 420 MPa– TS = 540 MPa > 380 MPa
540420
6
– %EL = 6 < 15• This doesn’t satisfy criteria…… what can we do?
Adapted from Fig. 8.19, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
Coldwork Calc Solution: Cont.
Page 39
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
For %EL > 15For TS > 380 MPa > 12 %CW
< 27 %CW
∴ our working range is limited to %CW = 12-27
380
12
15
27
Adapted from Fig. 8.19, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
Coldwork Calc Solution: Cont.
Page 40
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
Cold draw-anneal-cold draw again• For objective we need a cold work of %CW ≅ 12-27
• We’ll use %CW = 20• Diameter after first cold draw (before 2nd cold draw)?
• must be calculated as follows:
100%1 100 1% 2
02
22
202
22 CW
DDx
DDCW ff =−⇒⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−=
50
02
2
100%1
.f CW
DD
⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ −=
502
02
100%1
.f
CWDD
⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ −
=⇒
m 3350100201300
50
021 ..DD.
f =⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ −==Intermediate diameter =
Coldwork Calc Soln: Recrystallization
Page 41
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
Summary:1. Cold work D01= 0.40 in Df1 = 0.335 m
2. Anneal above D02 = Df13. Cold work D02= 0.335 in Df2 =0.30 m
Therefore, meets all requirements
20100 3350
301%2
2 =⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛−= x
..CW
24%MPa 400MPa 340
==
=σ
ELTS
y
⇒
%CW1 = 1−0.335
0.4⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟ 2⎛
⎝
⎜ ⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟ ⎟ x 100 = 30
Fig 7.19
Coldwork Calculations Solution
Page 42
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Hot work above TR
• Cold work below TR
• Smaller grains • stronger at low temperature• weaker at high temperature
t/RTBCt
kTERtR
1:note
log
logloglog 0
=
+=
−=−=
RT1
log t
start
finish
50%
Rate of Recrystallization
Page 43
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Fracture strengths of polymers ~ 10% of those for metals• Deformation strains for polymers > 1000%
– for most metals, deformation strains < 10%
brittle polymer
plastic
elastomerelastic moduli
– less than for metals Adapted from Fig. 7.22, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.
Mechanical Properties of Polymers - Stress-Strain Behavior
Page 44
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
brittle failure
plastic failure
σ(MPa)
ε
x
x
aligned, crosslinkedpolymer Stress-strain curves adapted from Fig. 7.22, Callister &
Rethwisch 3e.
InitialNear
Failure Initial
network polymer
NearFailure
Mechanisms of Deformation- Brittle Crosslinked and Network Polymers
Page 45
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
brittle failure
plastic failure
σ(MPa)
x
x
crystallineblock segments
separate
fibrillarstructure
near failure
crystallineregions align
onset of necking
undeformedstructure amorphous
regionselongate
unload/reload
Stress-strain curves adapted from Fig. 7.22, Callister & Rethwisch 3e.Inset figures along plastic response curve adapted from Figs. 8.27 & 8.28, Callister & Rethwisch 3e. (Figs. 8.27 & 8.28 are from J.M. Schultz, Polymer Materials Science, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1974, pp. 500-501.)
ε
Mechanisms of Deformation - Semicrystalline (Plastic) Polymers
Page 46
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Drawing…(ex: monofilament fishline)-- stretches the polymer prior to use-- aligns chains in the stretching direction
• Results of drawing:-- increases the elastic modulus (E) in the
stretching direction-- increases the tensile strength (TS) in the
stretching direction-- decreases ductility (%EL)
• Annealing after drawing...-- decreases chain alignment-- reverses effects of drawing (reduces E and
TS, enhances %EL)• Contrast to effects of cold working in metals!
Adapted from Fig. 8.28, Callister & Rethwisch 3e. (Fig. 8.28 is from J.M. Schultz, Polymer Materials Science, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1974, pp. 500-501.)
Predeformation by Drawing
Page 47
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Compare elastic behavior of elastomers with the:-- brittle behavior (of aligned, crosslinked & network polymers), and-- plastic behavior (of semicrystalline polymers) (as shown on previous slides)
Stress-strain curves adapted from Fig. 7.22, Callister & Rethwisch 3e. Inset figures along elastomer curve (green) adapted from Fig. 8.30, Callister & Rethwisch 3e. (Fig. 8.30 is from Z.D. Jastrzebski, The Nature and Properties of Engineering Materials, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, 1987.)
σ(MPa)
ε
initial: amorphous chains are kinked, cross-linked.
x
final: chainsare straighter,
stillcross-linked
elastomer
deformation is reversible (elastic)!
brittle failure
plastic failurex
x
Mechanisms of Deformation—Elastomers
Page 48
Division of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringDivision of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering
Edited by Byoung-Ho Choi
• Dislocations are observed primarily in metals and alloys.• Strength is increased by making dislocation motion difficult.• Particular ways to increase strength are to:
-- decrease grain size-- solid solution strengthening-- precipitate strengthening-- cold work
• Heating (annealing) can reduce dislocation density and increase grain size. This decreases the strength.
Summary